Timing of testicular sperm retrieval procedures and in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome

Effect of in vitro testicular spermatozoa culture on pregnancy outcomes: an experience at a single university hospital

Background

There are no guidelines for the optimal incubation time or temperature to improve pregnancy outcomes in testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (TESE-ICSI) cycles. We aimed to evaluate whether a 24-hour in vitro culture of testicular spermatozoa affects pregnancy outcomes in TESE-ICSI cycles.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 83 TESE-ICSI cycles using testicular spermatozoa in 46 couples with male partners suffering from nonobstructive or obstructive azoospermia. Sperm retrieval was performed either on the oocyte retrieval (OR) day (65 cycles in 33 couples; group A) or on the day before OR (18 cycles in 13 couples; group B) followed by in vitro culture for 24 hours. The clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes, including the number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rates, embryo transfer rates, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no differences in terms of clinical characteristics except for the levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) in males. Group B had higher LH levels than group A (4.56±1.24 IU/L vs. 3.67±1.07 IU/L, p=0.017). Group B showed higher fertilization rate (72.4%±32.1% vs. 59.2%±21.7%, p=0.045), implantation rate (35.0%±34.1% vs. 14.0%±21.5%, p=0.010), pregnancy rate per cycle (80% vs. 39%, p=0.033), and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (80% vs. 37.5%, p=0.024) than those of group A.

Conclusion

Testicular sperm retrieval performed on the day before OR followed by in vitro culture can potentially improve pregnancy outcomes.

Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with sperm retrieved by microscopic testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients

OBJECTIVE

The absence of any sperm in the ejaculate is called azoospermia and it is detected in 1% of males and 10-15% of those with infertility complaints. Azoospermia may be due to obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive (NOA) causes. Today, healthy pregnancies can be achieved in azoospermic patients by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) performed using sperm retrieved from microscopic testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE). In this study, we examined the sperm retrieval rates with m-TESE in azoospermic patients, the results of ICSI in OA and NOA patients with sperm and the underlying testicular pathologies in patients without sperm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent m-TESE at IVF unit of our hospital between January 2005 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 342 azoospermic patients (117 OA and 225 NOA cases) with regular follow-up were included in the study. In these cases, sperm retrieval and clinical pregnancy rates after ICSI were compared.

RESULTS

In the m-TESE procedure, motile sperm was found in all of the OA patients and in 52.4% (118/225) of the NOA patients. Clinical pregnancy rate in the OA group was 29.9% (35/117) and live birth rate was 25.6% (30/117). In the NOA group, the clinical pregnancy rate was 27.1% (32/118) and the live birth rate was 23.7% (27/118). Histopathologic evaluation was made in 107 cases in the NOA group with no testicular sperm, revealing that 59 cases with germ-cell aplasia (sertoli-cell only syndrome), 42 cases with maturation arrest, and 6 cases with hypospermatogenesis. Postoperative hematoma developed in 3 of m-TESE cases and subsided with conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

If motile sperm is retrieved with m-TESE application in azoospermic patients, pregnancy resulting in one live birth in about 4 couples who undergo ICSI application can be achieved. In the presence of motile sperm, live birth rates are similar between OA and NOA case with very low complication rates.

Validation-verification of a highly effective, practical human testicular tissue in vitro culture-cryopreservation procedure aimed to optimize pre-freeze and post-thaw motility

PURPOSE

The aim of our paper was to validate a testicular biopsy procedure that simplifies handling, processing, and cryopreservation, while at the same time optimizes sperm motility before freezing and after thawing.

METHODS

Two prospective studies were conducted to verify, optimize, and understand the virtues of pre-freeze testicular tissue IVC at different temperatures (21, 30, or 37 °C). Testicular tissue was obtained from clinical specimens designated for whole tissue cryopreservation (i.e., intact mass of tubules) and/or for fresh use in IVF-ICSI cycles. Whole testicular biopsy pieces (1-3 mm(3)) were diluted in glycerol containing freeze solutions, slow cooled to 4 °C and then rapidly frozen in LN2 vapor. Fresh and post-thaw testicular biopsy tissue were evaluated for changes in the quantity (%) and pattern of motility (I-IV: twitching to rapid progression, respectively) over a 1 week duration. The clinical effectiveness of IVC-cryopreserved whole testicular biopsy tissue was also validated analyzing fresh embryo transfers.

RESULTS

More reliable recovery of motile testicular sperm was achieved using whole tissue freeze preservation combined with IVC (24-96 h) post-acquisition at an incubation temperature of 30 °C compared to ambient temperature (21 °C) or 37 °C. Up to 85 % of the pre-freeze motility was conserved post-thaw (+3 h) for easy ICSI selection. Sperm longevity was optimized to fresh tissue levels by implementing testicular biopsy sucrose dilution post-thaw. Favorable clinical outcomes were proven using frozen-thawed testicular biopsy sperm for ICSI.

CONCLUSIONS

By employing minimal tissue manipulation, integrating pre-freeze IVC processing at 30 °C and the freezing of whole testicular biopsy tissue, we have reduced the labor and improved the efficacy of processing testicular tissue for freeze-preservation and subsequent ICSI use.

Impact on ICSI outcomes of adding 24 h of in vitro culture before testicular sperm freezing: a retrospective study

Purpose

To compare sperm parameters and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes for testicular spermatozoa frozen on the day of the biopsy (DO) with those frozen after 24 h of in vitro culture (D1).

Methods

In this retrospective study, from 1999 to 2012, forty-nine azoospermic patients were included to compare sperm (motility and viability) and outcomes (fertilization (FR), implantation (IR), pregnancy (PR) and delivery rates (DR)).

Results

The in vitro culture increased total motility (+2.8 %, p = 0.0161) but decreased viability (−8.3 %, p = 0.007). After 24 h of culture, the post-thaw changes in motility and viability were not significant. Twenty-six couples underwent ICSI: thirty–four ICSI were performed with spermatozoa cryopreserved at D0 and eighteen with spermatozoa frozen at D1. Cumulated IR and DR were lower for ICSI with D1 spermatozoa than with D0 spermatozoa (IR: 21.6 % with D0 vs. 9.8 % with D1, p = 0.102; DR: 27.5 % with D0 vs. 8.3 % with D1, p = 0.049).

Conclusion

Despite improving motility, freezing spermatozoa 24 h after testicular biopsy had a potential negative effect on ICSI outcomes, notably on delivery rates. These results may be related to the detrimental impact of the additional culture on the nuclear integrity of sperm.

Pregnancies and live births following ICSI with testicular spermatozoa after repeated implantation failure using ejaculated spermatozoa

The use of testicular spermatozoa for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is currently indicated exclusively for patients with azoospermia, since a favourable outcome is expected even when very few spermatozoa are present in the ejaculate. Here, a series of four couples with long-standing male factor infertility and multiple failed IVF/ICSI cycles are described. In all couples, the use of ejaculated spermatozoa for ICSI resulted in poor embryo quality and repeated implantation failure. Testicular sperm aspiration was performed in subsequent cycles, and testicular spermatozoa were used for ICSI. Embryo implantation and ongoing pregnancies/deliveries were achieved in all four couples. It is postulated that spermatozoa are subjected to post-testicular damage during sperm transport between the seminiferous tubules and epididymis, with the injection of damaged spermatozoa being the cause for repetitive IVF/ICSI failures. In selected patients, the use of testicular spermatozoa for IVF/ICSI should be considered, even when motile spermatozoa can be identified in the ejaculate.

[Male infertility: management strategies]

Although the objective of the urologist is to correct the factors of male infertility and to favour natural procreation, the strategy must consider also the couple and the female aspects of infertility. Some types of male infertility require specific treatment. In severe cases, recent advances in medical assistance to procreation have changed the prognosis of male infertility. Pregnancy can be obtained by the means of gamet manipulation and spermatozoid selection. Nevertheless, such techniques expose to genetic disorders transmission. Subsequently, genetic assessment is required during male infertility management, especially for difficult cases.

Causes of azoospermia and their management

Azoospermia may occur because of reproductive tract obstruction (obstructive azoospermia) or inadequate production of spermatozoa, such that spermatozoa do not appear in the ejaculate (non-obstructive azoospermia). Azoospermia is diagnosed based on the absence of spermatozoa after centrifugation of complete semen specimens using microscopic analysis. History and physical examination and hormonal analysis (FSH, testosterone) are undertaken to define the cause of azoospermia. Together, these factors provide a >90% prediction of the type of azoospermia (obstructive v. non-obstructive). Full definition of the type of azoospermia is provided based on diagnostic testicular biopsy. Obstructive azoospermia may be congenital (congenital absence of the vas deferens, idiopathic epididymal obstruction) or acquired (from infections, vasectomy, or other iatrogenic injuries to the male reproductive tract). Couples in whom the man has congenital reproductive tract obstruction should have cystic fibrosis (CF) gene mutation analysis for the female partner because of the high risk of the male being a CF carrier. Patients with acquired obstruction of the male reproductive tract may be treated using microsurgical reconstruction or transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts, depending on the level of obstruction. Alternatively, sperm retrieval with assisted reproduction may be used to effect pregnancies, with success rates of 25–65% reported by different centres. Non-obstructive azoospermia may be treated by defining the cause of low sperm production and initiating treatment. Genetic evaluation with Y-chromosome microdeletion analysis and karyotype testing provides prognostic information in these men. For men who have had any factors potentially affecting sperm production treated and remain azoospermic, sperm retrieval from the testis may be effective in 30–70% of cases. Once sperm are found, pregnancy rates of 20–50% may be obtained at different centres with in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

The diagnosis and treatment of the azoospermic patient in the age of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Microsurgical reconstruction remains the treatment of choice for men with reconstructable obstructive azoospermia. Sperm retrieval techniques performed with ICSI are highly effective for men in whom reconstruction is not feasible. In men with nonobstructive azoospermia, the optimization of spermatogenesis with hormonal therapy and, when appropriate, microsurgical varicocelectomy can result in the appearance of adequate sperm in the ejaculate for ICSI. In men with persistent nonobstructive azoospermia, TESE with ICSI has provided encouraging results. Caution must be used when this ART is applied in couples in whom genetic aberrations are detected given certain inheritance of these anomalies, as the genetic consequences of this procedure have not been thoroughly elucidated. Just as the possibility of ICSI was thought to be inconceivable several decades ago, the advent of future sentinel discoveries will present the possibility for realization of achievements that now seem incredulous.