Medroxyprogesterone acetate does not antagonize estrogen-induced increases in endothelium-dependent vasodilation: potential clinical implications

Medroxyprogesterone opposes estradiol-induced renal damage in midlife ovariectomized Long Evans rats

OBJECTIVE

Our laboratory previously published that long-term administration of estradiol (E2) was detrimental to the kidneys of midlife ovariectomized Long Evans rats, contrasting clinical studies in showing that menopausal hormone therapy is associated with decreased albuminuria. However, it is unknown whether this renal benefit was due to estrogen and/or the combination with progestogen. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine the impact of medroxyprogesterone (MPA) on E2-mediated renal damage using a rodent model.

METHODS

Female Long Evans retired breeders underwent ovariectomy at 11 months of age and were treated for 40 days with subcutaneous E2, E2+MPA or vehicle at doses mimicking that of menopausal hormone therapy (N = 5-7 per group). Systolic blood pressure was measured along with indices of renal damage and function to investigate the impact of MPA on E2-mediated renal outcomes. Renal estrogen receptor alpha and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor transcript copy numbers were measured in all treatment groups through droplet digital PCR.

RESULTS

Middle-aged female Long Evans rats displayed spontaneous hypertension with similar systolic blood pressures and heart weights between groups. Even though blood pressure was comparable, E2 reduced glomerular filtration rate and increased proteinuria indicating pressure-independent renal damage. Coadministration with MPA prevented E2-induced glomerular filtration rate impairment and proteinuria by promoting renal hypertrophy and preventing renal interstitial fibrosis. Both E2 and E2+MPA reduced renal estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and increased renal G protein-coupled estrogen receptor mRNA, but neither ERα nor ERß protein was different between groups.

CONCLUSION

MPA was protective against E2-induced renal damage and dysfunction in middle-aged female Long Evans rats. Assessing the impact of hormone therapy on renal outcomes may be an important clinical factor when considering treatment options for postmenopausal women.

Comparative effects of dydrogesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in critical areas: the brain and the vessels

Several epidemiological and observational studies have investigated the role of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. Within a few years, clinicians shifted from considering HRT as the panacea for everything to considering it a venomous poison with which women, in search of the fountain of eternal youth, could instead harm themselves. This debate is not yet settled and the unexplained discrepancy between basic science and some of the clinical trials has fueled the discussion. One of the hottest areas of discussion remains the role of progestins. For many years, progestins were considered only as necessary additions to estrogen to protect the endometrium. However, we now know that every progestin has its own specific activities on different tissues, which can vary significantly between progestins of different classes and even within the same class. Indeed, different progestins may support or oppose the effects of estrogen depending on the tissue, thereby supporting the concept that the clinical selection of progestins for HRT is critical in determining potential positive or detrimental effects. Newer progestins, such as dydrogesterone, show effects that are remarkably different from those of other agents; these actions might be particularly relevant in the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system. The aim of the present paper is to review the comparative effects of dydrogesterone and other progestins at these sites, supporting the idea that the progestin has to be clinically selected.

Differential signal transduction of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in human endothelial cells

The conjugated equine estrogens-only arm of the Women's Health Initiative trial, showing a trend toward protection from heart disease as opposed to women receiving also medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), strengthens the debate on the cardiovascular effects of progestins. We compared the effects of progesterone (P) or MPA on the synthesis of nitric oxide and on the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules, characterizing the signaling events recruited by these compounds. Although P significantly increases nitric oxide synthesis via transcriptional and nontranscriptional mechanisms, MPA is devoid of such effects. Moreover, when used together with physiological estradiol (E2) concentrations, P potentiates E2 effects, whereas MPA impairs E2 signaling. These findings are observed both in isolated human endothelial cells as well as in vivo, in ovariectomized rat aortas. A marked difference in the recruitment of MAPK and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase explains the divergent effects of the two gestagens. In addition, both P and MPA decrease the adhesiveness of endothelial cells for leukocytes when given alone or with estrogen. MPA is more potent than P in inhibiting the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1. However, when administered together with physiological amounts of glucocorticoids, MPA (which also binds glucocorticoid receptor) markedly interferes with the hydrocortisone-dependent stabilization of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappaB and with the expression of adhesion molecules, acting as a partial glucocorticoid receptor antagonist. Our findings show significant differences in the signal transduction pathways recruited by P and MPA in endothelial cells, which may have relevant clinical implications.