Antagonists in poor-responder patients

Causal inference indicates that poor responders have similar outcomes with the antagonist protocol compared with flare

OBJECTIVE

To use causal inference to investigate whether the flare or antagonist protocol is better for poor responders going through controlled ovarian stimulation.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Retrieval cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

PATIENTS

Patients in the United States underwent autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from 2014 to 2019 using either the flare or antagonist protocol.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary outcomes included oocytes retrieved, fertilized oocytes (2PNs), blastocysts, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), and cycle cancelation rate.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, patients with a predicted poor response (antimüllerian hormone, <0.5) on their first in vitro fertilization cycle had similar outcomes on the antagonist protocol (CLBR of 14.2%, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 13.6%, 14.8%) compared with flare (CLBR of 13.6%, 95% CIs: 12.4%, 14.8%). We evaluated patients undergoing a second cycle after having a poor response (<4 oocytes retrieved) on their first cycle. Patients in the antagonist-to-antagonist group had a similar change in outcomes between the first and second cycles (average CLBR improvement of 13.9%, 95% CIs: 12.1%, 15.6%) compared with the antagonist-to-flare group (average CLBR improvement of 14.4%, 95% CIs: 10.9%, 18.3%). In addition, patients in the flare-to-antagonist group had a similar change in outcomes between the first and second cycles (average CLBR improvement of 10.4%, 95% CIs: 6.6%, 14.5%) compared with the flare-to-flare group (average CLBR improvement of 9.0%, 95% CIs: 5.1%, 13.4%).

CONCLUSION

Poor responders have similar outcomes on an antagonist protocol compared with a flare protocol for both the first and second cycles.

Efficacy of luteal estrogen administration and an early follicular Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization

Objectives

We investigated whether luteal estrogen administration and an early follicular Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (E/G-ant) priming protocol improves clinical outcomes in poor responders to controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer, and identified underlying mechanisms.

Methods

This restrospective study consisted of 65 poor responders who underwent the E/G-ant priming protocol. Sixty-four other poor responders undergoing conventional protocols without pretreatment were included as the control group. Clinical outcomes were compared between 2 groups.

Results

The E/G-ant priming protocol group exhibited improvements over the control group in terms of the number of retrieved oocytes (3.58±2.24 vs. 1.70±1.45; P=0.000), mature oocytes (2.68±2.11 vs. 1.65±1.23; P=0.000), fertilized oocytes (2.25±1.74 vs. 1.32±1.26; P=0.001), good embryos (1.62±0.91 vs. 1.14±0.90, P=0.021). Day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; 8.40±4.84 vs. 16.39±13.56; P=0.000) and pre-ovulation progesterone levels (0.67 vs. 1.28 ng/mL; P=0.016) were significantly higher in the control group than in the E/G-ant priming group. The overall rate of positive human chorionic gonadotropin tests was higher in the E/G-ant priming group than in the control group (32.3% vs.16.1%; P=0.039). Also, clinical pregnancy rate (26.2% vs. 12.5%; P=0.048) and the rate of live births (23.1% vs. 7.1%; P=0.023) were significantly higher in the E/G-ant priming group than in the control group.

Conclusion

The E/G-ant priming protocol would lead to promising results in poor responders to IVF by suppressing endogenous FSH and by preventing premature luteinization.

Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, which became commercially available from 1999, have been used for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. This review focuses on the recent literature on the use of GnRH antagonists and provides guidelines for optimal use in light of increasing evidence showing that GnRH antagonists are safe and effective, allowing flexibility of treatment in a wide range of patient populations. This includes patients undergoing first-line controlled ovarian stimulation, poor responders, and women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome. The GnRH antagonist offers a viable alternative to the long agonists, providing a shorter duration of treatment with fewer injections and with no adverse effects on assisted reproductive technology outcome. This results in a significantly lower amount of gonadotropins required, which is likely to lead to improved patient compliance.

GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol with oral contraceptive pill pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol (MDP) with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) pretreatment in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI, compared with GnRH antagonist MDP without OCP pretreatment and GnRH agonist low-dose long protocol (LP).

Methods

A total of 120 poor responders were randomized into three groups according to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) options; GnRH antagonist MDP after OCP pretreatment (group 1), GnRH antagonist MDP without OCP pretreatment (group 2) or GnRH agonist luteal low-dose LP without OCP pretreatment (group 3). Patients allocated in group 1 were pretreated with OCP for 21days in the cycle preceding COS, and ovarian stimulation using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) was started 5 days after discontinuation of OCP.

Results

There were no differences in patients' characteristics among three groups. Total dose and days of rhFSH used for COS were significantly higher in group 3 than in group 1 or 2. The numbers of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and grade I, II embryos were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 or 3. There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate among three groups.

Conclusion

GnRH antagonist MDP with OCP pretreatment is at least as effective as GnRH agonist low-dose LP in poor responders and can benefit the poor responders by reducing the amount and duration of FSH required for follicular maturation.

Comparison of microdose flare-up and antagonist multiple-dose protocols for poor-responder patients: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the microdose flare-up and multiple-dose antagonist protocols for poor-responder patients in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-ET cycles.

DESIGN

A randomized, prospective study.

SETTING

Center for assisted reproductive technology in Turkey.

PATIENT(S)

Ninety patients with poor ovarian response in a minimum of two previous IVF cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

All women were prospectively randomized into two groups by computer-assisted randomization. The patients in group 1 were stimulated according to the microdose flare-up protocol (n = 45), while the patients in group 2 were stimulated according to antagonist multiple-dose protocol (n = 45).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved was the primary outcome measure, and fertilization rate, implantation rate per embryo, and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcome measures.

RESULT(S)

The mean age of the women, the mean duration of infertility, basal FSH level, and the number of previous IVF cycles were similar in both groups. The total gonadotropin dose used was significantly higher in group 2, while the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly greater in group 1. Although the fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates were nonsignificantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the multiple-dose antagonist group (22% vs. 11%).

CONCLUSION(S)

The microdose flare-up protocol seems to have a better outcome in poor-responder patients, with a significantly higher mean number of mature oocytes retrieved and higher implantation rate.

[Premature ovarian failure: which protocols?]

This review shows the results of the various studies concerning the protocols applied to the women presenting a premature ovarian failure. Will be thus analyzed the natural cycles (or semi-natural), the increase in the dose of gonadotrophins, the clomiphene citrate and the anti-aromatases, the protocols with GnRH agonists long, short, stop or microdoses, the protocols with GnRH antagonists and the adjuvant treatments: aspirin, nitric oxyde, recombinant LH recombining, growth hormone and androgens. The interest of several protocols is to collect a sufficient number of oocytes (and thus of embryos to be transferred), making it possible to obtain reasonable rates of pregnancy. However, it arises that the rates of pregnancy observed among these women depend not only on their ovarian reserve and their age, but are also function of the type of infertility, of the cycle number and the uterus.

A luteal estradiol protocol for expected poor-responders improves embryo number and quality

OBJECTIVE

To compare embryo and oocyte data between a standard protocol and a luteal phase estradiol protocol.

DESIGN

Retrospective paired cohort analysis.

SETTING

Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center.

PATIENT(S)

60 poor-responder patients undergoing 120 IVF cycles.

INTERVENTION(S)

Addition of luteal estradiol to the standard IVF protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of embryos with > or = 7 cells on day 3 of development.

RESULT(S)

The luteal phase estradiol protocol showed a statistically significantly greater number of embryos with > or = 7 cells, oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and embryos than did the standard protocol. There was no difference between the two protocols with respect to basal antral follicle count, days of stimulation, number of follicles > or = 14 mm on day of surge, or endometrial thickness on day of surge. A trend toward improved pregnancy outcomes was found with the luteal estradiol protocol.

CONCLUSION(S)

Giving estradiol in the luteal phase preceding IVF hyperstimulation increases the number and the quality of embryos achieved in patients deemed to have a poor response to IVF. Ultimately, this may translate into improved pregnancy outcomes in these patients.

Patient-friendly IVF: how should it be defined?

"Patient-friendly" IVF must be associated with a healthy newborn achieved in a safe, cost-effective, and timely manner. Patients are best served when physicians provide honest appraisal of treatment techniques and outcomes using the evidence available from scientific study.

Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a microdose GnRH agonist flare (ML) with a GnRH antagonist/letrozole (AL) protocol before IVF-ET in poor responders.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled trial.

SETTING

Private assisted reproductive technology center.

PATIENT(S)

Five hundred thirty-four infertile women classified as past or potential poor responders based on clinic-specific criteria.

INTERVENTION(S)

Poor responders were prospectively assigned to an ML or AL protocol in a 2:1 ratio, respectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Results of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

Patient characteristics were similar between the two protocol groups. There were no significant differences in mean age, number of oocytes, fertilization rates, number of embryos transferred, or embryo score. Peak E(2) levels were significantly lower in the AL group. Ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the ML group (52% vs. 37%). Trends toward increased implantation and lower cancellation rates were also noted, but these did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION(S)

Quantitative results of stimulation between the ML and AL protocols were equivalent with the exception of peak E(2) levels. However, the higher ongoing pregnancy rates and trend toward superior implantation rates would suggest that ML represents a preferred approach for the poor responder. An increased sample size would be necessary to verify these findings.

Novel follicular-phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization in the poor responder

Poor responders continue to be vexing in infertility therapy. By using GnRH antagonists before ovarian stimulation, we demonstrate an improvement in oocyte, embryo, and zygote yield in patients with a prior poor response.

Comparisons of follicular levels of sex steroids, gonadotropins and insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in poor responder and normoresponder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist

OBJECTIVE

To determine the serum and intrafollicular concentrations of sex steroids, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in women demonstrating poor response to ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and GnRH antagonists, and to compare the results with age-matched women displaying normal ovarian response.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cross-sectional study conducted in a private IVF center. Forty-eight age-matched women producing 5 or fewer oocytes (poor responders) or 10 or more oocytes (normoresponders) at the end of controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception participated in the experiment. Gonadotropins and GnRH antagonists were used for ovarian stimulation, while ICSI was employed for assisted fertilization. Serum and follicular concentrations of FSH, LH and sex steroids (estradiol, progesterone and testosterone), and follicular concentrations of EGF and IGF-1 were assayed in both groups.

RESULTS

Serum and follicular levels of E(2) and progesterone were significantly lower in the poor responder group compared to the normoresponder group. Follicular level of testosterone was also lower in poor responders, but not to a level of statistical significance. The serum FSH level was higher in the poor responder group, but follicular levels of gonadotropins did not differ between the two groups. The follicular level of IGF-1 was significantly lower in poor responders. In contrast, the EGF concentration did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased levels of sex steroids in poor responder patients undergoing COH with GnRH antagonist, suggests that reduced IGF-1 expression acts as a modulator of impaired ovarian steroidogenesis.

Use of oral contraceptives in infertile patients: A descriptive review

In the past and currently, there are several applications of oral contraceptives (OCs) in the field of infertility. The aim of the present descriptive review is to analyze the old and new uses of OCs in infertile patients undergoing simple or multiple ovulation-induction programs. Available data seem to indicate that OCs given before treatment could be effective in patients who are resistant to clomiphene citrate and in poor responders. In addition, the use of OCs is useful for scheduling in vitro fertilization programs downregulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonists.

Cetrorelix in women with poor ovarian response in previous assisted reproduction cycles

Our aim was to compare a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with an analogue protocol using high dose gonadotrophins (rFSH) in women with poor ovarian response in order to optimise the management while undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. We recruited 31 consecutive patients over 5 months. The eligibility criteria for the study were: one or more previous cancelled cycle due to <or=3 follicles on day of hCG, or a total of >or=4,500 IU of rFSH. For the antagonist cycle regimen, we used daily 300 IU of rFSH from day 2 on the menses, and then from day 5 daily 0.25 mg of Cetrorelix until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration. We demonstrated that the use of an antagonist cycle was associated with a reduction in cancellation rates from 48% (agonist) to 10% (antagonist) (p < 0.039) allowing women to undergoing oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer with a non-significant improvement in the pregnancy rates.

In a flexible antagonist protocol, earlier, criteria-based initiation of GnRH antagonist is associated with increased pregnancy rates in IVF

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to assess ongoing pregnancy rates across groups of patients treated by IVF, which were defined according to criteria aimed at the prevention of premature LH surge and used for initiating GnRH antagonist.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational cohort study. During the last 3 years, in IVF-ICSI patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with the antagonist protocol, the antagonist administration was initiated according to at least one of the following patient-specific criteria: (i) at least one follicle measuring >14 mm; (ii) estradiol levels >600 pg/ml; and (iii) LH levels >10 IU/l. Based upon these criteria, 208 cases of normal responders were analysed and categorized into three groups according to the starting day of the regimen: group D4 (n = 40) for day 4, group D5 (n = 98) for day 5 and group D6 (n = 70) for day 6. The main outcome measure was the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle.

RESULTS

The total number of patients in the D4 and D5 groups (138 out of 208), who received the antagonist earlier, was considerably larger compared with that of D6 (70 out of 208). Ongoing pregnancy rates were 37.5, 34.7 and 18.6% for groups D4, D5 and D6, respectively. Patients who initiated the GnRH antagonist on days 4 and 5 had statistically significant higher pregnancy rates compared with day 6. Rapid response, causing earlier antagonist administration initiation, according to the proposed criteria for the prevention of premature LH surges, and the absence of premature luteinization, as evidenced by normal progesterone levels on HCG day, were found to be independent positive predictive factors for favourable IVF outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The employment of an algorithm of criteria, aimed at the prevention of premature LH surges in a flexible antagonist protocol, resulted in antagonist initiation earlier than on stimulation day 6 in a significant proportion of patients. In those patients, a higher pregnancy rate was observed.

Management of poor responders in IVF

Correct controlled ovarian stimulation is of paramount importance in assisted reproductive technologies. Therefore, analysis of the ovarian reserve of the patient is mandatory to tailor the best ovarian stimulation regimen. When the ovarian reserve is reduced, the induction of a multifollicular growth remains a challenge. Several factors could be associated with reduced ovarian response. However, reduced ovarian reserve either in older patients or in young patients represents the most frequent aetiological factor. Whatever is the aetiology, one of the main problems is how to predict a reduced ovarian response, and although several tests have been suggested, no very accurate predictive test is available. A variety of different stimulation protocols have been suggested but the lack of any large-scale, prospective, randomized, controlled trials of the different management strategies and the lack of a uniform definition of the population may result in comparisons of heterogeneous groups of patients, making it difficult to draw any definitive conclusions. Natural cycle IVF may represent an easy and cheap approach in the management of this group of patients. Although no controlled large prospective randomized studies are available to compare the natural IVF procedure with ovarian stimulation IVF in poor responder patients, the efficacy of natural cycle IVF is hampered by high cancellation rates mainly due to untimely LH surge. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists in the late follicular phase, which reduces the premature LH rise rate, and the improvements in laboratory conditions and fertilization techniques, increase the embryo transfer rates, making this procedure more cost-effective.

Clinical efficacy of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, ganirelix, in Korean women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone

AIM

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, ganirelix (Orgalutran), treatment in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in Korean women.

METHODS

This was a non-comparative, open-label, single-center trial carried out on 31 infertile Korean women. A daily dose of 0.25 mg of the GnRH antagonist, ganirelix, was given, beginning on the sixth day of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment. If the ovarian response was low, ganirelix treatment was delayed until the leading follicle reached a mean diameter of 14 mm. The ganirelix treatment was continued until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. Descriptive statistics were recorded for all parameters.

RESULTS

The median duration of ganirelix treatment was 4 days (range: 2-6 days) and the median total recombinant FSH dose was 1350 IU (900-2350 IU). During ganirelix treatment, the incidence of luteinizing hormone (LH) rises (LH = 10 IU/L) was 3.2% (one of 31 cases). On the day ovulation was triggered by hCG, the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm in diameter was 12.4 +/- 4.5, and the median of serum estradiol concentration was 4289.9 (1893.7-8268.5) pmol/L. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 10.9 +/- 6.1. The fertilization rate was 61.5%, and the mean number of replaced embryos was 2.8 +/- 0.6. The mean implantation rate was 10.0%, and the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 23.3% (seven of 30 cases) and the ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was 20.0% (six of 30 cases).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study support ganirelix as a safe, short, convenient and effective treatment for patients undergoing COH for IVF in Korean women.

An initial low response predicts poor outcome in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection despite improved ovarian response in consecutive cycles

OBJECTIVE

To study the predictive value of initial low response (LR) in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Two Finnish fertility centers.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 3,846 IVF/ICSI cycles performed from 1994 to 2002.

INTERVENTION(S)

Consecutive cycles in the same subject were identified. The study groups consisted of subjects who had three treatment cycles and at least one LR cycle (n = 80).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate (PR), total gonadotropin dose, and embryo quality.

RESULT(S)

Only 2.5% (2/80) of subjects had a LR in all three consecutive cycles. In 43 women an initial LR was followed by >/=1 normal response (NR) cycle, and in 35 women an initial NR was followed by >/=1 LR cycle. The PR/cycle was similarly low in women with an initial LR and an initial NR (10.1% vs. 16.2%). An increase in gonadotropin dose resulted in a higher number of oocytes in women with an initial LR (from 2.1 +/- 0.9 to 6.7 +/- 2.7) but the PR/cycle remained low, compared to the overall mean PR (27.2%). In cycles in which top quality embryos were transferred, subjects with an initial LR had a lower PR than women with an initial NR (17.8% vs. 41.2%).

CONCLUSION(S)

An initial LR is a predictor of poor outcome in subsequent cycles, even if ovarian response is improved by increasing the gonadotropin dose or a top quality embryo is replaced.

Ganirelix acetate use in normal- and poor-prognosis patients and the impact of estradiol patterns

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cycle outcomes in patients with either poor or normal prognosis undergoing IVF treatment with a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix acetate) for LH suppression.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized, noncontrolled, retrospective review.

PATIENT(S)

204 patients, aged 23-41 years, undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients completed 225 consecutive cycles of IVF with a GnRH antagonist (Antagon; Organon, Roseland, NJ) for LH surge prevention. Sixty cycles were conducted in patients with a known poor prognosis, whereas 165 were conducted in patients with a normal IVF prognosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate (PR), for the series as a whole and according to prognosis, and serum E2 patterns.

RESULT(S)

The PR per initiated cycle for the series as a whole was 33.3%. The pregnancy rate was 42.1% per ET for the entire series, with a cycle cancellation rate of 21%. When evaluated by prognosis, the poor-prognosis patients had PRs of 8.3% per attempt and 15% per transfer, whereas the normal-prognosis patients had PRs of 40% per attempt and 45% per transfer. Pregnancy rate did not vary by E2 pattern (drop, plateau, or rise). Oral contraceptive pretreatment was noted to be associated with high cancellation rates in the group of known poor responders, whereas for the group as a whole, cycle outcome was unaffected by the use of oral contraceptives.

CONCLUSION(S)

Use of GnRH antagonists in patients with an a priori poor IVF prognosis results in predictably poor outcomes. Patients without factors predicting poor outcome have acceptable PRs. The pattern of E2 rise immediately after initiation of GnRH antagonists does not predict cycle outcome. Oral contraceptives can be successfully used to schedule antagonist-based IVF cycles but might increase the risk of cycle cancellation in some patient populations.

GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This is the first published report of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a fixed, multi-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF.

METHODS

Sixty-six poor responders were randomized into two groups: the study group received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix daily starting on day 6 of stimulation; the control group received 600 microg of buserelin acetate daily starting in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. Both groups were given a fixed dose of recombinant FSH (300 IU daily) for stimulation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the cycle cancellation rates, duration of stimulation, consumption of gonadotrophins, and mean numbers of mature follicles, oocytes and embryos obtained. The implantation rates were similar, but the number of embryos transferred was significantly higher for the antagonist group (2.32 +/- 0.58 versus 1.50 +/- 0.83; P = 0.01). The pregnancy rates were also higher in the antagonist group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

A fixed multi-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is feasible for patients who are poor responders on a long agonist protocol; however, our study failed to demonstrate an overall improvement in ovarian responsiveness. Clinical outcomes may be improved by developing more flexible antagonist regimens, an approach that requires further evaluation.

A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) pill pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist versus recombinant FSH/GnRH-agonist stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, and to evaluate optimization of retrieval day.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

SETTING

Private practice and university centers.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty patients undergoing IVF who met the appropriate inclusion criteria.

INTERVENTION(S)

Four study centers recruited 80 patients. The OC regimen began on cycle days 2 to 4 and was discontinued on a Sunday after 14 to 28 days. The recombinant FSH regimen was begun on the following Friday. The GnRH-agonist group was treated with a long protocol; the GnRH-antagonist was initiated when the lead follicle reached 12 to 14 mm. When two follicles had reached 16 to 18 mm, hCG was administered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measures were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, day of the week for oocyte retrieval, and total dose and days of stimulation of recombinant FSH. Secondary efficacy variables included pregnancy and implantation rate; serum E(2) levels on stimulation day 1; serum E(2), P, and LH levels on the day of hCG administration; follicle size on day 6 and day of hCG administration; the total days of GnRH-analogue treatment; total days on OC; total days from end of OC to oocyte retrieval; and the cycle cancellation rate.

RESULT(S)

Patient outcomes were similar for the days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin used, two-pronuclei embryos, pregnancy (44.4% GnRH-antagonist vs. 45.0% GnRH-agonist, P=.86) and implantation rates (22.2% GnRH-antagonist vs. 26.4% GnRH-agonist, P=.71). Oral contraceptive cycle scheduling resulted in 78% and 90% of retrievals performed Monday through Friday for GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist. A one day delay in OC discontinuation and recombinant FSH start would result in over 90% of oocyte retrievals occurring Monday through Friday in both groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

The OC pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist protocols provides a patient-friendly regimen and can be optimized for weekday retrievals. No difference was seen in number of 2PN embryos, cryopreserved embryos, embryos transferred, implantation and pregnancy rates between the two stimulation protocols.

GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH) in comparison with the standard long protocol in poor-responder patients. Sixty patients with poor ovarian response in previous treatment cycles were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 30) was stimulated with a standard long protocol, and group B (n = 30) received GnRH antagonist. Vaginal ultrasound was performed to evaluate ovarian response. There was a significantly reduced duration of ovarian stimulation (9.8 +/- 0.8 versus 14.6 +/- 1.2, P = 0.001) in group B in comparison with group A, and a reduced number of ampoules was used in group B (49.3 +/- 4.3 versus 72.6 +/- 6.8, P = 0.0001). In group B, the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher than in group A (5.6 +/- 1.6 versus 4.3 +/- 2.2, P = 0.02) and there was an increased number of follicles with a diameter >15 mm at human chorionic gonadotrophin administration in group B (P = 0.0001). Fewer cycles were cancelled with the use of an antagonist protocol. Five pregnancies (17% for embryo transfer) were obtained with GnRH antagonist protocol and two (7% for embryo transfer) with GnRH agonist protocol.