The comparison of early follicular and midluteal administration of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

Application value of Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol in patients with resistant ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Resistant ovarian syndrome(ROS) is a rare disease. It is difficult to diagnose and treat. Most of the literature reports on assisted pregnancy treatment for ROS patients are individual case reports. In this paper, the ovulation stimulation protocol and assisted pregnancy process of ROS infertile patients in our reproductive center were summarized and analyzed to provide information and support for the clinical treatment of ROS patients.

METHODS

From January 2017 to March 2022, assisted reproductive technology treatments and clinical characteristics parameters of six patients with ROS were retrospectively reviewed. Based on controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, these stimulation cycles were separated into four groups: Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol (EFLL) group (n = 6), Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation(PPOS) protocol group (n = 5), mild-stimulation protocol group (n = 2), and Natural cycle protocol group (n = 3).

RESULTS

A total of 16 cycles of ovulation stimulation were carried out in 6 patients with ROS. A total of 19 oocytes were retrieved, as well as 13 MII oocytes, 11 two pronuclear(2PN) fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos. The oocytes acquisition rate was 50% and the fertilization rate of 2PN was 57.9%, and the excellent embryo rate was 72.7%. The EFLL protocol obtained 17 oocytes, 12 MII oocytes, 11 2PN fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos; the mild-stimulation protocol obtained 1 oocyte; the Natural cycle protocol obtained 1 oocyte, and oocytes were not matured after in vitro maturation (IVM); the PPOS protocol obtained no oocytes. Compared with three other protocols, The fertilization rate of 2PN (64.7%) and excellent embryo rate (72.7%) in the EFLL protocol were higher than those of other protocols(0%). Two fresh cycle embryo transfers resulted in live births, while two frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles resulted in one live birth and one clinical pregnancy using the EFLL protocol.

CONCLUSION

Although the current study is based on a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that the EFLL protocol can be employed for ovarian stimulation and may result in a live birth in ROS patients.

No significant long-term complications from inadvertent exposure to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during early pregnancy in mothers and offspring: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in the luteal phase is commonly used for pituitary suppression during in vitro fertilisation (IVF). There is an ineluctable risk of inadvertent exposure of spontaneous pregnancy to GnRH-a. However, little is known about the pregnancy complications and repregnancy outcomes of the affected women and the neurodevelopmental outcomes of the GnRH-a-exposed children.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was used to determine obstetric and repregnancy outcomes after natural conception in 114 women who naturally conceived while receiving GnRH-a during their early pregnancy over the past 17 years. The GnRH-a-exposed children were evaluated to determine their neonatal characteristics and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. The outcomes were compared to those of relevant age-matched control groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-five women had 66 live births. The neonatal health outcomes and the incidence of maternal complications were similar in the GnRH-a-exposed and control groups. Thirty-one GnRH-a-exposed children, aged 2-8 years, were available for investigation of neurodevelopment. Except for one case of autism spectrum disorder, the full-scale intelligence quotient score was within the normal range and similar to that of the control group. Most mothers with successful pregnancies and about one-third of the women who had spontaneous abortions were subsequently able to conceive naturally again. IVF is recommended for repregnancy in women who have experienced ectopic pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Accidental exposure to GnRH-a in early pregnancy might be safe. Reproductive treatment suggestions for repregnancy should be made with consideration of the outcomes of the previously GnRH-a-exposed spontaneous pregnancy.

Analysis of the Number of Euploid Embryos in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles With Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol

Studies have shown that early-follicular phase long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol (EFLL), a popular controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol widely used in China, leads to higher rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy, as well as lower rates of spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. However, the impact of EFLL on euploid embryos and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To address these gaps of knowledge, we conducted a retrospective comparative study of 310 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles with a total of 1,541 embryos using the EFLL protocol or midluteal short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol (MLSL). Patients were matched by PGT subtype [aneuploidies (PGT-A) vs. PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)], age (±2 years), and body mass index (±1 kg/m²). For PGT-A, there was no significant difference in the number of euploid embryos (1.80 ± 1.47 for EFLL vs. 1.84 ± 2.03 for MLSL, p > 0.05) or the rate of euploidy (44.6 vs. 36.9%, p > 0.05). For PGT-SR, the number of euploid embryos in the EFLL group was significantly higher than that in the MLSL group (1.76 ± 1.54 vs. 1.21 ± 1.24, p < 0.05). A higher euploidy rate was also observed with the EFLL protocol compared with that obtained in MLSL (31.9 vs. 25.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Compared with the MLSL protocol, more euploid embryos were achieved when using the EFLL protocol in PGT-SR, demonstrating the value in PGT-SR. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to compare embryonic outcomes between EFLL and MLSL, providing key insights into the clinical application of EFLL in PGT cycles. In the light of the limited sample size of our study, we recommend that these questions be explored using a larger prospective study.

GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the differences of the ovarian stimulation (OS) characteristics, laboratory, and clinical outcomes between follicular-phase single-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

METHODS

About 1883 consecutive IVF/ICSI fresh cycles of normal ovarian responders were retrospectively analyzed, with 1229 in the single-dose GnRH agonist protocol group and 654 in the GnRH antagonist protocol group at Reproductive Medical Center of Tongji Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017.

RESULTS

The follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist group showed significantly more oocytes obtained, higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate, as well as lower luteinizing hormone (LH) level and estradiol (E2)/oocyte ratio on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. However, differences were not significant in meiosis II (MII) oocyte rate, two pronuclear zygote (2PN) embryo rate, viable embryo rate or high-quality embryo rate, compared with the GnRH antagonist group. Further comparison of clinical outcomes in the first frozen-thawed cycles did not show significant difference in either implantation or clinical pregnancy rate between the two protocol groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol may achieve better clinical outcomes in normal ovarian responders, which could be explained more by positive effect on endometrial receptivity rather than embryo quality.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are commonly used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinising hormone surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) prior to planned oocyte retrieval, thus optimising the chances of live birth.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of the different GnRHa protocols as adjuncts to COH in women undergoing ART cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to April 2015: the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and registries of ongoing trials. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two protocols of GnRHa used in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in subfertile women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted the data. The primary outcome measure was number of live births or ongoing pregnancies per woman/couple randomised. Secondary outcome measures were number of clinical pregnancies, number of oocytes retrieved, dose of gonadotrophins used, adverse effects (pregnancy losses, ovarian hyperstimulation, cycle cancellation, and premature luteinising hormone (LH) surges), and cost and acceptability of the regimens. We combined data to calculate odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I² statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 37 RCTs (3872 women), one ongoing trial, and one trial awaiting classification. These trials made nine different comparisons between protocols. Twenty of the RCTs compared long protocols and short protocols. Only 19/37 RCTs reported live birth or ongoing pregnancy.There was no conclusive evidence of a difference between a long protocol and a short protocol in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.81; 12 RCTs, n = 976 women, I² = 15%, low quality evidence). Our findings suggest that in a population in which 14% of women achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a short protocol, between 13% and 23% will achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a long protocol. There was evidence of an increase in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92; 20 RCTs, n = 1643 women, I² = 27%, moderate quality evidence) associated with the use of a long protocol.There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in terms of live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates when the following GnRHa protocols were compared: long versus ultrashort protocol (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.36; one RCT, n = 150 women, low quality evidence), long luteal versus long follicular phase protocol (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.10; one RCT, n = 223 women, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was stopped versus when it was continued (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.33; three RCTs, n = 290 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when the dose of GnRHa was reduced versus when the same dose was continued (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.52; four RCTs, n = 407 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was discontinued versus continued after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in the long protocol (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.64; one RCT, n = 181 women, low quality evidence), and when administration of GnRHa lasted for two versus three weeks before stimulation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.68; one RCT, n = 85 women, low quality evidence). Our primary outcomes were not reported for any other comparisons.Regarding adverse events, there were insufficient data to enable us to reach any conclusions except about the cycle cancellation rate. There was no conclusive evidence of a difference in cycle cancellation rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.55; 11 RCTs, n = 1026 women, I² = 42%, low quality evidence) when a long protocol was compared with a short protocol. This suggests that in a population in which 9% of women would have their cycles cancelled using a short protocol, between 5.5% and 14% will have cancelled cycles when using a long protocol.The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to low. The main limitations in the evidence were failure to report live birth or ongoing pregnancy, poor reporting of methods in the primary studies, and imprecise findings due to lack of data. Only 10 of the 37 included studies were conducted within the last 10 years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When long GnRHa protocols and short GnRHa protocols were compared, we found no conclusive evidence of a difference in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates, but there was moderate quality evidence of higher clinical pregnancy rates in the long protocol group. None of the other analyses showed any evidence of a difference in birth or pregnancy outcomes between the protocols compared. There was insufficient evidence to make any conclusions regarding adverse effects.

The criteria for optimal down-regulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate whether the degree of down-regulation using GnRH-agonists is associated with pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective analysis was performed on 2708 cycles from 2514 patients undergoing down-regulation with the luteal phase long protocol. The serum oestradiol (E2D) and luteinising hormone (LHD) levels, the diameter of the largest follicle (DLFD) and the endometrial-thickness (ENTD) after down-regulation were used to evaluate the degree of down-regulation. One-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni adjustment, the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (CCPR) and the cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were higher in the cycles with E2D < 30 pg/ml (63.7%, OR = 1.405 (1.055-1.870) and 56.8%, OR = 1.372 (1.039-1.813)) and 30-55pg/ml (66.8%, OR = 1.439 (1.104-1.874) and 59.8%, OR = 1.397 (1.080-1.806)) than in those with E2D > 55 pg/ml (62.8% and 54.7%). There was a trend towards lower CCPRs and CLBRs in the cycles with DLFD > 10 mm or ENTD ≥ 6 mm; however, this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

The degree of down-regulation is associated with ovarian response, pregnancy, and live birth. We propose the following criteria for optimal down-regulation: E2D 30-55 pg/ml, ENTD < 6 mm, and no apparent ovarian activity.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinizing hormone surge. Various protocols have been described in the literature, such as long protocols (continuous and stop or reduce dose, long luteal, or long follicular protocol); short protocols and ultrashort protocols.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective GnRHa protocol as an adjuvant to gonadotrophins in ART cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAHL and PsycINFO. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. All the searches were updated to August 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials comparing any two protocols of GnRHa in in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was live births per women. Secondary outcome measures were pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, number of oocytes retrieved and amount of gonadotrophins used. Data were independently extracted in 2 x 2 tables by two authors. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated after verifying the presence of homogeneity of treatment effect across all trials. For continuous variables mean differences (MD) were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 29 included studies, 17 compared long with short protocols; two compared long with ultrashort protocols; four compared a follicular versus luteal start of GnRHa; three compared continuation versus stopping the GnRHa at the start of stimulation; three compared continuation of the same dose versus reduced dose of GnRHa and one compared a short versus short stop protocol.There was no evidence of a difference in the live birth rate but this outcome was only reported by three studies.There was evidence of a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.93) in a long protocol when compared to a short protocol. That is there is a 50% increase in chance of achieving pregnancy if a long protocol is used as compared to a short protocol, although this difference could range from 16% to 93% increased chance of pregnancy. This difference did not persist when the meta-analysis was done only on the studies with adequate randomisation (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.05).There was evidence of an increased number of oocytes (MD 1.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.04) obtained when a long protocol was used as compared to a short protocol. That is there is a 60% increase in the number of oocytes retrieved when a long protocol is used as compared to a short protocol, although this difference could range from 18% to 304% more oocytes.There was evidence of an increase (MD 12.90, 95% CI 3.29 to 22.51) in the requirement for gonadotrophins in long as compared to short protocols. That is approximately 12.9 more ampoules of gonadotrophins were consumed when a long protocol was used as compared to a short protocol. This difference could range from 3.29 to 22.51 more gonadotrophin ampoules.There was no evidence of a difference in any of the outcome measures for luteal versus follicular start of GnRHa and stopping versus continuation of GnRHa at the start of stimulation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The pregnancy rate was found to be higher when GnRHa was used in a long protocol as compared to a short or ultrashort protocol. There was no evidence of a difference in live birth rate, but this outcome was only reported by three studies. There was no evidence of a difference in the outcomes amongst various long protocols; nor that stopping or reducing GnRHa at the start of stimulation was associated with a reduced pregnancy rate. For all comparison, except a long versus short protocol, there was a lack of power.

[Premature ovarian failure: which protocols?]

This review shows the results of the various studies concerning the protocols applied to the women presenting a premature ovarian failure. Will be thus analyzed the natural cycles (or semi-natural), the increase in the dose of gonadotrophins, the clomiphene citrate and the anti-aromatases, the protocols with GnRH agonists long, short, stop or microdoses, the protocols with GnRH antagonists and the adjuvant treatments: aspirin, nitric oxyde, recombinant LH recombining, growth hormone and androgens. The interest of several protocols is to collect a sufficient number of oocytes (and thus of embryos to be transferred), making it possible to obtain reasonable rates of pregnancy. However, it arises that the rates of pregnancy observed among these women depend not only on their ovarian reserve and their age, but are also function of the type of infertility, of the cycle number and the uterus.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles

This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) as compared with daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. The mean dosage of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) required for COH (2,354.5+/-244.2 vs. 2,012.5+/-626.1 IU) and the rFSH dosage per retrieved oocyte (336.7+/-230.4 vs. 292.1+/-540.4 IU) were significantly higher in the long-acting GnRHa group (N= 22) than those in the short-acting GnRHa group (N=28) (p<0.05). However, the mean number of visit to the hospital that was required before ovum pick-up (3.3+/-0.5 vs. 22.2+/-2.0) and the frequency of injecting GnRHa and rFSH (12.8+/-1.2 vs. 33.5+/- 3.5) were significantly decreased in the long-acting GnRHa group (p<0.0001). The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and early pregnancy loss rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups. So, we suggest that a single administration of long-acting GnRHa is a useful alternative for improving patient's convenience with clinical outcomes comparable to daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in COH for IVF-ET cycles.

Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve

PURPOSE

To review the available treatments for women with significantly diminished ovarian reserve and assess the efficacy of different ovarian stimulation protocols.

METHODS

Literature research performed among studies that have been published in the Pubmed, in the Scopus Search Machine and in Cohrane database of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

A lack of clear, uniform definition of the poor responders and a lack of large-scale randomized studies make data interpretation very difficult for precise conclusions. Optimistic data have been presented by the use of high doses of gonadotropins, flare up Gn RH-a protocol (standard or microdose), stop protocols, luteal onset of Gn RH-a and the short protocol. Natural cycle or a modified natural cycle seems to be an appropriate strategy. Low dose hCG in the first days of ovarian stimulation has promising results. Molecular biology tools (mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been also considered to assist the management of this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal stimulation for these patients with diminished ovarian reserve remains a great challenge for the clinician, within the limits of our pharmaceutical quiver.

Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility

BACKGROUND

The quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in subfertility and their suitability for inclusion in meta-analyses have been assessed in the past and found to be insufficient. Our aim was to assess whether this quality has improved over time, particularly since the publication of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement, and to assess what proportion of trials could be included in the meta-analyses of pregnancy outcomes such as those included in Cochrane Reviews.

METHODS

A selection of subfertility trials published in 1990, 1996 and 2002 was collected from the Cochrane Menstrual Disorder and Subfertility Group (MDSG) database. Only trials published in English as full journal articles, claiming to be randomized and reporting on pregnancy outcomes, were included.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-four trials met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-four (15%) were found not to be randomized, despite claims, and only 10 trials (6%) provided adequate details on the methods of randomization and allocation concealment. Of these, only three had sufficient details extractable to allow for an intention-to-treat analysis of the outcome 'live birth'.

CONCLUSIONS

Although an improvement in some subfertility-specific issues was observed, the quality of reporting of RCTs still needs to improve to make them suitable for inclusion in meta-analyses such as those in the Cochrane Library.

Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of flare-up and GnRH-antagonist treatment in poor-responder patients.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S)

Fifty-five poor-responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Thirty patients received GnRH agonist on the 1st day of menstruation, followed by exogenous gonadotropins from the 2nd day. Twenty-five patients received exogenous gonadotropins starting on the second day of menstruation, followed by GnRH antagonist when the leading follicle reached 14 mm in diameter.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The total dose of FSH administered during the ovarian stimulation, as well as the number of mature oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy rates were evaluated.

RESULT(S)

The number of ampules and units of FSH administered were significantly less in the flare-up than in the antagonistic group. The numbers of mature oocytes retrieved and of top-quality embryos transferred were significantly greater in the flare-up than in the GnRH-antagonist group. The fertilization rate (84% vs. 63%) was significantly higher in the flare-up than in the GnRH-antagonist group. The implantation and pregnancy rate were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

The flare-up protocol appears to be more effective than the GnRH-antagonist protocol in terms of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and top-quality embryos transferred in poor-responder patients.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and reproductive medicine

The hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a key regulator of the reproductive system, mainly through its effects on pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are modifications of the natural decapeptide, being either agonists (GnRHa) or antagonists. GnRHa may imitate the native hormone and induce an endogenous LH surge; however, sustained treatment with GnRHa results in complete refractoriness of LH and FSH production. This aspect of GnRHa action is the main application of the GnRHa in reproduction today. The hypogonadotropic hypogonadal state that results from the sustained treatment is the basis for additional applications of the GnRHa. The agonists appear to be effective, to some extent, for the treatment of endometriosis and were proved to be beneficial prior to surgery for fibroma uteri. GnRHa is used in assisted reproduction for both induction of an endogenous LH surge and for induction of ovulation, and its capacity to cause refractoriness of the pituitary may be used to avoid a premature LH surge. It is suggested that the GnRHa have a direct effect on ovarian steroidogenesis, which is independent of its action on the pituitary. This unwanted effect and other possible drawbacks of the agonists are thought to be eliminated with the use of the antagonists. The mechanism of action of these antagonists is through competitive blocking of the GnRH receptor, which results in a rapid but reversible suppression of gonadotropin secretion. As for GnRHa, GnRH antagonists have been proven effective to prevent the LH surge and to reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles.

Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study

The efficacy and safety of short acting buserelin and nafarelin intranasal spray were compared to long acting leuprorelin depot intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in this prospective study of 157 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Patients were allocated to three groups to receive buserelin 150 microg nasal spray three times daily (Group B), nafarelin nasal spray 400 microg twice daily (Group N), or leuprorelin depot 3.75 mg once by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection (Group L) for pituitary desensitisation prior to commencing COH with human menopausal gonadotrophins (hMG) according to the Centre's protocol. The mean (+/-S.D.) age (years) (32.6+/-3.8: Group B, 32.1+/-3.3: Group N versus 32.1+/-3.3: Group L); mean (+/-S.D.) total dosage of hMG (ampoules) (37.5+/-16.1: Group B, 39.8+/-14.2: Group N versus 41.9+/-12.6: Group L) and mean daily dosage of hMG (ampoules) (3.1: Group B, 2.8: Group N versus 3.0: Group L) seen were not statistically significantly different. The duration between starting the different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) and the beginning of the next menstrual period was also not seen to be statistically significantly different between the three groups (Group B: 10+/-5.5, Group N: 9.1+/-4.1 versus Group L: 8.2+/-3, days). The number of abandoned cycles was higher in Group L (17% versus 11.8%: Group B and 11.3%: Group N) but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The clinical pregnancy rates per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer procedure were respectively, 31.1, 35% in Group B, 12.8, 14% in Group N versus 20.5, 23.7 in Group L and were not seen to be statistically significantly different even when ongoing pregnancy rates were compared. Apart from a statistically significantly greater incidence of allergic nasal reactions in the nafarelin group (P=0.001), all other side-effects were not shown to be statistically significantly different between the three groups. We conclude that a single dose of leuprorelin depot can be considered to be as an equally effective alternative to multiple doses of buserelin or nafarelin for pituitary desensitisation in women undergoing COH for IVF.

Comparison between a single dose of goserelin (depot) and multiple daily doses of leuprolide acetate for pituitary suppression in IVF treatment: a clinical endocrinological study of the ovarian response

PURPOSE

Compare the efficacy and safety of two different GnRHa, used for pituitary suppression in IVF cycles.

METHODS

A total of 292 patients using depot goserelin (Group 1) and 167 using daily leuprolide acetate (Group 2) were compared. Days required to achieve pituitary function suppression, duration of ovarian stimulation, total dose of HMG, number of aspirated follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, and presence of functional ovarian cyst were analyzed.

RESULTS

The time taken to achieve downregulation was similar. The mean number of ampoules used for superovulation was higher in Group 1; however, this difference was observed only for patients >40 years old that started GnRHa in the follicular phase. There was no difference between the two groups in the duration of superovulation, in the number of follicles aspirated, and the number of oocytes retrieved. In the group of patients with >40 years the incidence of ovarian cysts was higher in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Both routes of GnRHa have similar effects for pituitary suppression and ovulation induction in assisted reproductive technology. Therefore the long-acting GnRHa is an excellent option, as only a single subcutaneous dose is necessary, decreasing the risk of the patient to forget its use and, most important, it does not interfere in the patient's quality of life.

Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimens in the prior poor-responder patient preparing for assisted reproductive techniques.

DESIGN

English-language literature review.

PATIENT(S)

Candidates for assisted reproductive techniques who had been defined as having a prior suboptimal response to standard COH regimens.

INTERVENTION(S)

A variety of regimes are reviewed, including increased gonadotropin doses, change of gonadotropins, adjunctive growth hormone (GH), luteal phase (long) GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) initiation, early follicular phase (flare) GnRH-a initiation, low-dose luteal phase (ultrashort) GnRH-a initiation, progestin pretreatment, and microdose flare GnRH-a initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Maximal serum E(2) levels, follicular development, dose, and duration of gonadotropin therapy, cycle cancellation rates, oocytes retrieved, embryos transferred, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

A lack of uniformity in definition of the poor responder and of prospective randomized trials make data interpretation somewhat difficult. Of the varied strategies proposed, those that seem to be more uniformly beneficial are microdose GnRH-a flare and late luteal phase initiation of a short course of low-dose GnRH-a discontinued before COH.

CONCLUSION(S)

No single regimen will benefit all poor responders. General acceptance of uniform definitions and performance of large-scale prospective randomized trials are critical. Development of a reliable precycle screen will allow effective differentiation among normal responders, poor responders, and those who will not conceive with their own oocytes.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are used in assisted reproduction cycles to reversibly block pituitary function and prevent a luteinizing hormone surge. In the short and ultrashort protocols of GnRHa administration, injection of gonadotropins is commenced a few days after the start of GnRHa. In the long protocols (with GnRHa started either in the midluteal phase or in the early follicular phase) gonadotropin administration is delayed until pituitary desensitization has been achieved, usually 2-3 weeks.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic overview of available data comparing short or ultrashort and long GnRHa protocols for pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT) treatment cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search strategies included on-line searching of the MEDLINE and EMBASE data bases and the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Specialised Register from 1982 to 1998, and hand searching of bibliographies of relevant publications and reviews, and abstracts of scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of short or ultrashort versus long (follicular or luteal phase start) GnRHa protocols in IVF or GIFT treatment cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted into 2 x 2 tables. For the primary outcome, clinical pregnancy per cycle started, the overall common odds ratio (OR) and the risk difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated after verifying the presence of homogeneity of treatment effect across all trials. The following subgroup comparisons were performed: ultrashort versus long protocols, short versus long protocols and, within each of these comparisons, subgroups of studies which used the long protocol with follicular phase start or the long protocol with luteal phase start. Secondary outcomes considered were clinical pregnancy per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer, spontaneous abortion, ongoing/delivered pregnancy per cycle started, number of ampoules of gonadotropin used, number of oocytes retrieved, and fertilization rate.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six trials met the inclusion criteria. The common OR for clinical pregnancy per cycle started was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10 - 1.57) in favour of the long GnRHa protocol. The studies were subgrouped, depending on whether, in the long protocol, the GnRHa was commenced in the follicular phase (8 trials) or luteal phase (16 trials). The respective ORs were 1.54 (95% CI, 1.11 - 2. 13) and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.98 - 1.51). After excluding the four trials using the ultrashort protocol, the OR for long versus short protocols (22 trials) was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.04 - 1.56). A comparison of long versus ultrashort protocols (4 trials) produced an OR of 1. 47 (95% CI, 1.02 - 2.12).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of clinical pregnancy rate per cycle started, this meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of the long protocol over the short and ultrashort protocols for GnRHa use in IVF and GIFT cycles.

A comparison of three gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized study

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) has resulted in improved pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycles. Traditionally, short-acting analogues have been employed because of concerns over long-acting depot preparations causing profound suppression and luteal phase defects adversely affecting pregnancy and miscarriage rates. We randomized 60 IVF patients to receive a short-acting GnRHa, nafarelin or buserelin, or to receive a depot formulation, leuprorelin, all commenced in the early follicular phase and compared their effects on hormonal suppression and clinical outcome. We found that on day 15 of administration there was a significant difference in the suppression of oestradiol from initial concentrations, when patients on buserelin were compared with patients on nafarelin or leuprorelin (54 versus 72 and 65%; P < 0.05) and also in the number of patients satisfactorily suppressed, (80 versus 90 and 90%; P < 0.05), though there were no differences between the analogues by day 21. Similarly there was no difference in hormonal suppression during the stimulation phase or in implantation, pregnancy or miscarriage rates in comparing the three agonists. We conclude that with nafarelin and leuprorelin, stimulation with gonadotrophins may begin after 2 weeks of suppression and that long-acting GnRHa are as effective as short-acting analogues with no detrimental effects on the luteal phase.

Effects of pretreatment with an oral contraceptive on the time required to achieve pituitary suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues and on subsequent implantation and pregnancy rates

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of pretreatment with an oral contraceptive (OC) on ovarian cyst formation during pituitary suppression with buserelin acetate.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-three patients who were undergoing IVF-ET treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients in the study group were pretreated with an OC for 14 days starting on the first day of menstruation. The administration of SC buserelin acetate was initiated on the last day of OC administration. Patients in the control group began to receive buserelin acetate on day 2 of menstruation. Hormonal assays and ultrasound scans were performed on the first day of menstruation, and 7, 11, and 14 days after the commencement of buserelin acetate administration. Thereafter, these tests were performed weekly until pituitary suppression was achieved.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Incidence of cyst formation.

RESULT(S)

A cyst developed in 27 patients in the control group (52.9%) and no patients in the study group (odds ratio [OR]=115; 95% confidence interval [CI]=10-617). Patients in the study group achieved pituitary suppression faster (median difference [MD]=7 days; 95% CI=4-14) and required fewer ampules of gonadotropin (MD=10; 95% CI=6-14). They recruited more follicles (MD=3; 95% CI=0-5) and had higher pregnancy rates (37.2% versus 33.3%).

CONCLUSION(S)

Pretreatment with an OC abolishes ovarian cyst formation, shortens the time required to achieve pituitary suppression, and decreases gonadotropin requirements without having a negative effect on pregnancy rates.

Use of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists in polycystic ovary syndrome

Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have been used in conjunction with gonadotrophins, and occasionally with pulsatile LHRH, for ovulation induction in women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and also for superovulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete intrafallopian transfer in women with PCOS. In IVF, LHRH agonists given by the 'long protocol' before gonadotrophins are commenced have consistently shown higher pregnancy rates and higher live birth rates. Although the optimal time to commence LHRH agonist is not clearly determined, commencement in the early follicular phase possibly with pre-treatment with the combined oral contraceptive pill would avoid the risk of inadvertent administration during early pregnancy. The role of LHRH agonists in ovulation induction is less clear cut, although there may be some advantages in patients with refractory PCOS. The role of LHRH agonists in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and recurrent miscarriage is also discussed.

Pretreatment with an oral contraceptive is effective in reducing the incidence of functional ovarian cyst formation during pituitary suppression by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to assess the effect of pretreatment with oral contraceptives (OCs) on the formation of functional ovarian cysts during pituitary suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, subsequent follicular development, and pregnancy rates.

METHODS

A retrospective case-controlled study of 31 in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, all of whom in a previous cycle had commenced the long protocol of GnRH-agonist (Buserelin) in the early follicular phase and were pretreated in a subsequent cycle with 2 weeks of an OC containing 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol and 150 micrograms of desogestrel prior to GnRH-agonist administration, was undertaken. Follow-up visits were arranged after a minimum of 11 days of GnRH-agonist administration and weekly thereafter until pituitary suppression was achieved.

RESULTS

Cysts were detected in 16 (51.6%) of the 31 patients not pretreated with OCs, and in 0 (0%) of the 31 patients pretreated with OCs (odds ratio = 67.1; 95% confidence interval = 5.6-350.7). Patients pretreated with OCs achieved pituitary suppression more rapidly (median difference = 4 days; 95% confidence interval = 2-7) and had comparable gonadotropin requirements and pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with OCs prior to pituitary suppression in the early follicular phase decreases ovarian cyst formation, without an apparent effect on subsequent follicular recruitment or pregnancy rates.

Use of the flare-up protocol with high dose human follicle stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization in poor responders

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of high dose human FSH in combination with hMG with a flare-up leuprolide acetate (LA) protocol in patients undergoing IVF at risk for a poor response.

DESIGN

Prospective.

SETTING

Free-standing ambulatory IVF center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred eighty-four patients underwent a LA screening test for IVF. Patients with a lack of flare response were considered at risk for a poor response and underwent ovarian stimulation with the flare-up LA protocol in combination with high dose human FSH and hMG.

RESULTS

The poor responder group was compared with the good responders on the flare-up LA protocol and to patients undergoing ovulation induction with a luteal phase LA protocol. There were 53 poor responder flare-up LA cycles, 177 good responder flare-up LA cycles, and 54 luteal phase LA cycles. The cancellation rate was higher in poor flare-up LA responders (11.3 percent) compared with good flare-up LA responders (1.1 percent) and luteal phase LA cycles (1.8 percent). Peak E2 levels, number of oocytes, and number of embryos were significantly higher in the good flare-up LA responders. Fertilization rate was similar in all groups. Ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval was 28 percent in good responders, 29 percent in poor responders, and 33 percent in luteal phase LA patients. Only one patient (0.4 percent) was hospitalized for severe ovarian hyperstimulation.

CONCLUSION

The flare-up protocol with high-dose human FSH and hMG is a very good alternative for patients who are at high risk for a poor response. Although peak E2 and number of oocytes were significantly lower in this group, the patients who responded had the same fertilization and pregnancy rate as the good responders. Cancellation rate remains high in poor responders.

Pituitary down-regulation in IVF cycles: is it necessary to use strict criteria?

PURPOSE

In a retrospective study we have reviewed the data of 570 consecutive IVF cycles in which a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) was started in the early follicular phase (long protocol). Cycles were divided in groups according to estradiol levels before HMG administration: A, < 20 pg/ml; B, 20 to 50 pg/ml; C, 51 to 100 pg/ml. Our objective was to determine if the degree of pituitary suppression had any effect on the ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous gonadotropins, and/or on the IVF outcome.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in cycle cancellation rates, no. of days of stimulation and ampoules of HMG, serum estradiol after HMG, no. of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rates between groups. Pregnancy rates (19.4%, 21% and 31.8%/cycle, and 24.1%, 27.5% and 37.8% / embryo transfer, respectively) and live-birth rates (16.2%, 16.1% and 25.0%/cycle, 20.1%, 21.2% and 29.7%/embryo transfer, respectively) were also not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of pituitary suppression had no effects on either the ovarian response to gonadotropins (including HMG requirements) or the overall IVF results.

Ovarian activity during follicular-phase down regulation in in vitro fertilization is associated with advanced maternal age and a high recurrence rate in subsequent cycles

PURPOSE

Previous reports have suggested that the ovarian response to leuprolide acetate is predictive of in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. This study evaluated the outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles complicated by elevated estradiol levels during leuprolide acetate down regulation and the outcome of subsequent cycles in the same patients.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-two in vitro fertilization cycles were initiated utilizing leuprolide acetate down regulation beginning on cycle day 1.

RESULTS

Seventy-four of these cycles had an elevated estradiol level at the time of the baseline scan (28%). This group of patients had a higher maternal age, a higher cycle cancellation rate (27.5 vs 16.3%), and a high rate of recurrence on subsequent cycles (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

The pregnancy rate per retrieval was equivalent in the two groups. This suggests that patients with advanced maternal age or a history of failure to suppress in a previous cycle may benefit from alternate regimens of superovulation.

Infertility treatment: from cookery to science. The epidemiology of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To review the epidemiology of published randomised controlled trials in infertility treatment over the last 25 years, with special emphasis on the number and quality of trials.

DESIGN

Computer literature review by MEDLINE backed up by a manual search of 41 journals. Each trial was classified according to the methodology described and quality criteria. The results were recorded in a computer database. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated where the data were sufficient.

SUBJECTS

Couples suffering from primary or secondary infertility. The trials studied 33,761 patients overall.

SETTING

Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds.

RESULTS

Five hundred and one randomised trials in male and female infertility treatment were identified between 1966 and 1990. Pregnancy was an outcome in 291 (58%) and these were the subject of detailed analysis. Two hundred and twenty-four (77%) and 67 (23%) 'pregnancy trials' were concerned, respectively, with female and male infertility. Four per cent of the trials were preceded by a sample size calculation, and the average sample size was 96 patients (range 5-933); 700 patients per group would be required to demonstrate plausible success rates for most treatments. The method of randomisation was unstated or pseudo-randomised in 206 (71%) of trials where pregnancy was an outcome. Only 29 (5.8%) of studies were multicentre. The method of confirmation of pregnancy was omitted for 70% of papers. Cross-over design was used in 103 (21%) of cases. Meta-analysis is possible for selected topics such as the use of anti-oestrogens in idiopathic oligospermia and unexplained female infertility. Eight cases of double reporting were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials using randomised methodology were relatively few in comparison with other branches of medicine, although their use is important in the evaluation of treatment for infertility as treatment-independent pregnancy is common. It was encouraging to note that an exponential increase in the use of this methodology occurred during the last three years, especially in association with assisted conception techniques, and meta-analysis has become possible for selected topics. However, many trials suffer from an unrealistically small sample size, inappropriate use of cross-over design or pseudo-randomisation. The trend towards properly controlled studies should be encouraged but these studies should be of improved quality and organised on a multicentre or even international basis.

Estrogenic suppression by different administration schedules of goserelin depot for treatment of endometriosis

Eighteen patients affected by laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were randomly assigned to three different schedules of treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (goserelin depot formulation 3.6 mg) every 28 days for 6 months. Six women received the first implant in early follicular phase, 4 in late luteal phase and 8 in 3rd and 17th day from onset of menses. Pretreatment and posttreatment laparoscopic score, performed according to the American Fertility Society scoring system, were compared; a significant reduction in the extent of disease was observed in each group investigated (A and C: p < 0.01; B: p < 0.05). In each treatment group after the second GnRH-a implant the mean levels of estrone-3-glucuronide (E1-3G), daily measured in early morning urine specimens during the control cycle and the first three months of therapy, were suppressed to menopausal women range. In group B during the 2nd and 3rd month of therapy, the urinary mean levels of E1-3G were significantly lower than in group A and C. In conclusion the different goserelin depot administration schedules gave similar laparoscopic improvement, in spite of the first GnRH-a administration in luteal phase allowed a more marked estrogenic suppression.

Pilot trial of a gonadotropin hormone agonist with replacement hormones as a prototype contraceptive to prevent breast cancer

Combination oral contraceptive (COC) users have reduced risks of ovarian and endometrial cancer, but COCs have not reduced breast cancer risk. We have previously argued that a hormonal contraceptive with substantially lower doses of sex-steroids should reduce breast cancer risk by decreasing the breast epithelial cell proliferation below usual premenopausal levels. We report here the preliminary results of a pilot trial with such a prototype contraceptive consisting of an agonist of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRHA) administered with low doses of an oral estrogen (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen, CE, for 6 days every week) and intermittent oral progestogen (10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, MPA, for 13 days every 4 months). Eighteen subjects at five-fold or greater increased breast cancer risk were entered and randomized -12 to the contraceptive arm and 6 to a control arm. The principal endpoints included tolerance of the regimen, vaginal bleeding patterns, and the regimen's effect on the endometrium, bone metabolism, and lipids. A symptom questionnaire was used to assess tolerance; the contraceptive subjects had fewer symptoms following initiation of the regimen. This results from the elimination of symptoms associated with the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, commonly referred to collectively as premenstrual syndrome, PMS. The few occurrences of hot flushes or vaginal dryness that did occur were eliminated by small increases in estrogen dose (0.9 mg CE). Scheduled vaginal bleeding occurred associated with most periods of progestogen administration. Unscheduled bleeding or spotting was infrequent and decreased with time on the regimen. A beneficial rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was evident in the contraceptive subjects. Despite the use of an estrogen dose which is known to prevent loss of bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women, an annualized loss of 1.9% was seen in contraceptive subjects. It is hypothesized that this is secondary to inhibition of ovarian androgen production by the GnRHA, which may additionally account for changes in libido occasionally reported with GnRHA. The study continues with the addition of a small dose of androgen to replace that lost by the action of the GnRHA.

Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol in comparison with the long-acting GnRH-a protocol and menotropin alone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome of a 3-day gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administration: ultrashort protocol with the outcome of long-acting GnRH-a cycles or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) alone.

DESIGN

Ninety-two cycles of the ultrashort protocol were matched with 92 cycles with long GnRH-a and with 92 hMG cycles.

SETTING

The IVF-ET program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Amount and duration of hMG treatment, hormonal profile on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, and fertilization and pregnancy rates (PRs) were examined and compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The ultrashort group needed a higher number of hMG ampules than the hMG group but significantly less than in the long GnRH-a regimen. The number of oocytes in the ultrashort protocol was the same as in the long GnRH-a, but the number of embryos per retrieval was significantly lower than with the long GnRH-a protocol and similar to that found in the hMG group. The ultrashort protocol yielded 10% PR per cycle and 17% per replacement, significantly lower than with the long GnRH-a protocol, 26% and 36%, respectively, but also lower than in the hMG one, namely 13% and 28%.

CONCLUSION

The ultrashort protocol, although being convenient and having some advantages found in the long GnRH-a protocol, is inferior in its outcome compared with the two other protocols.

The use of long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; decapeptyl) and gonadotropins versus short-acting GnRH-a (buserelin) and gonadotropins before and during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)

The efficiency of two ovarian stimulation protocols using different gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) was examined and compared with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)-only stimulation. Fifty-four patients who had 57 aspiration cycles were treated with protocol 1, which consisted of long-acting GnRH-a D-Trp6 (Decapeptyl Depot) and hMG. Protocol 2 entailed intranasal administration of short-acting GnRH-a (Buserelin) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in 66 women who underwent 70 aspiration cycles. Fifty-five patients who had 59 ovum pickups (OPU) treated with hMG only served as a control. No differences were observed in cycle parameters and hormonal concentrations among the three groups. The total clinical pregnancy rates per OPU for patients receiving protocols 1 and 2 were 12.3 and 27.1%, respectively (P less than 0.05). The pregnancy loss was significantly lower in protocol 2 than in protocol 1 (26.3 versus 71.4%; P less than 0.05). Our data show superiority of short-acting GnRH-a over the long-acting agents in achievement of pregnancy and its outcome, though neither was significantly different from the hMG-only protocol.