Antiovary antibodies, repeated attempts, and outcome of in vitro fertilization

Innate and adaptive immune dysregulation in women with recurrent implantation failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a condition where a woman fails to obtain pregnancy after multiple embryo transfer cycles, even with superior-quality blastocysts. There are various factors that can contribute to RIF, including immunologic disturbances. The immune system is extremely important during pregnancy. Immune cells such as T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophages (MQ) are present in the female reproductive tract and are accountable for regulating the immune response to invading pathogens and maintaining tissue homeostasis. Dysregulation of these immune cells can lead to inflammation, which can impair fertility. One of the most common immunological disturbances observed in RIF is an altered Th1/Th2 ratio, along with changes in NK cell and macrophage numbers. In addition, the presence of some antibodies, such as anti-ovarian antibodies, can also contribute to RIF. Interleukins have been implicated in the development of an inflammatory response that can interfere with successful embryo implantation. As a result, a comprehensive understanding of immunological compartments in RIF women could assist us in determining the immunological origins of this disease. We will discuss immunological factors that might contribute to RIF etiology, including cellular and molecular components.

Poor ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology cycles is associated with anti-ovarian antibody and pro-inflammatory immune responses

Anti-ovarian antibody (AOA) could be considered an independent marker for autoimmune ovarian disease and predicting future premature ovarian failure (POF). This study aims to investigate if AOA is associated with poor ovarian response (POR) and pro-inflammatory immune responses in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. Two hundred forty-eight women undergoing ART cycles were divided into four groups based on AOA test results and the presence of POR: POR(-)/AOA(-) group (N = 148), POR(+)/AOA(-) group (N = 34), POR (-)/AOA(+) group (N = 44), POR(+)/AOA(+) group (N = 22). The POR patients have a significantly higher prevalence of AOA than non-POR patients (P < 0.05). Peripheral blood CD56 + natural killer (NK) cell level (%), NK cytotoxicity, CD19 +CD5 + B-1 cell level (%), and IFN-γ/IL-10 producing T helper (Th) 1/Th2 cell ratios were significantly higher in POR(+)/AOA(+) group than those of other groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.005, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). TNF-α/IL-10 producing Th1/Th2 cell ratio of POR(+)/AOA(+) group was significantly higher than those of POR(+)/AOA(-) and POR(-)/AOA(-) groups (P < 0.05, respectively). Homocysteine and vitamin D levels of the POR(+)/AOA(+) group were significantly lower than those of other groups (P < 0.005, respectively). Plasminogen activator inhibiter-1 (PAI-1) level of POR(+)/AOA(+) group was significantly higher than that of POR(-)/AOA(-) group (P < 0.05). In the POR(+)/AOA(+) group, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies was significantly higher than that of the POR(+)/AOA(-) group (P = 0.005). Women with autoimmune POR (POR(+)/AOA(+)) have dysregulated pro-inflammatory immune responses and metabolic factors. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for autoimmune POR should be differentiated from those for non-autoimmune POR.

The status of anti-ovarian antibody immunoassays: Valid or invalid, in or out?

There has been a paradign shift in the status of immunoassays. There used to be a time where immunoassays had a very narrow role in clinical medicine, but that is not the case in today's world. Immunoassays have taken a central role in helping us better understand and treat human diseases. The literature around anti-ovarian antibodies (AOA) immunoassay testings have been conflicting. Researchers challenged the specificity of the reported assays, but a systematic study was never elucidated on what/who the trouble maker was in rendering these tests so nonspecific. Attempts were made by our group in Mumbai, India, to throw light on the culprit behind the nonspecificity casative factor in the immunoassays and a method to overcome this was reported and published. This review highlights the stories back five and a half decades to date, to demonstrate where the status of AOA testing was, is and will be.

Successful live birth after in vitro maturation treatment in a patient with autoimmune premature ovarian failure: a case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

We report a successful live birth after oocytes in vitro maturation (IVM) and fresh embryo transfer in a patient with autoimmune premature ovarian failure (POF) and performed a review of the literature of livebirths obtained after oocytes IVM treatment in this indication.

METHODS

The patient was a 24-year-old woman with autoimmune POF diagnosed post-partum, who developed autoimmune polyglandular syndrome with serum anti-ovarian and anti-21-hydroxylase antibodies. The patient had typical symptoms of POF: secondary amenorrhea with hypoestrogenism, elevated gonadotropins and infertility; however, the serum anti-Müllerian hormone level and total antral follicle count remained normal. IVM of immature oocytes was performed after the administration of 150 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin for three consecutive days and an injection of 10,000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin to trigger ovulation.

RESULTS

The six oocyte-cumulus complexes collected matured in vitro. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), five embryos were obtained. Pregnancy was achieved after the fresh transfer of two embryos and appropriate endometrial preparation. A normal female child was delivered following a 37-weeks pregnancy characterized by the onset of adrenal insufficiency and unstable diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a successful livebirth after IVM treatment in a patient with autoimmune premature ovarian failure (POF). Management of reproductive age women with autoimmune pathology requires fertility counseling. Early diagnosis of autoimmune POF is important for early conception and oocyte preservation, because the only other option at present is ovum donation.

Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders

AIM

To compare the outcome of double ovarian stimulation (DOS) with follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) per started cycle in poor ovarian responders (PORs).

METHODS

A total of 204 PORs who underwent ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization, cryopreservation of all embryos available, and frozen embryo transfer cycle were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 146 received single FPS, and 58 received DOS. All viable embryos were cryopreserved and subsequently transferred within 1-6 months.

RESULTS

The number of oocytes collected and the number of mature oocytes per started cycle were higher in the DOS group compared to the FPS group (6.0 ± 1.9 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3 and 4.3 ± 1.3 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, respectively, p = 0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per started cycle were also significantly higher in the DOS group than the FPS group (41.4% vs. 16.4% and 36.2% vs. 15.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). The cancellation rate of embryo transfer due to no viable embryo was significantly lower in the DOS group (10.3%) than the FPS group (40.4%) (p = 0.001). In the DOS group, numbers of oocytes (3.2 ± 1.2 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1, p = 0.006), MII oocytes (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.001), and cryopreserved blastocysts (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.1 ± 0.7, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the luteal ovarian stimulation compared to follicular ovarian stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Live birth per started cycle with DOS is superior to FPS in PORs. Luteal phase stimulation contributes to improving pregnancy rates in these patients.

Female Unexplained Infertility: A Disease with Imbalanced Adaptive Immunity

Unexplained infertility (UI) among women consists of only 10-17% of infertile females. Unexplained or idiopathic infertility is a condition, in which couples are not able to conceive without any definite causes. The presence of the decidual immune system (innate or adaptive) is essential for a successful pregnancy and fertility that is mediated by T helper (Th) 1, Th2, Th17, T follicular helper, CD8+ CD28− T, and regulatory T cells, as well as autoantibodies such as antiphospholipid antibody, antithyroid antibody, antiovarian antibody, cytokines, and chemokines. Therefore, altered proportions or levels of the mentioned compartments of the adaptive immune system may cause pregnancy failure and infertility, especially in UI. Consequently, a deep understanding of immunological compartments in females with UI may help us to define the causes of this disease with regard to immunology. This review will discuss immunological factors, including cellular, molecular components, and transcription factors that are involved in the etiology of UI.

Premature ovarian insufficiency and autoimmune diseases

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a clinical syndrome defined by loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40 years and has a potentially devastating effect upon women's health, both physically and psychologically. An underlying autoimmune disease has been identified in approximately 20% of patients with POI, the most common of which are disorders of the thyroid and adrenal glands. Nevertheless, in the majority of cases, the etiology is unknown. The damage mechanism to the ovary is usually caused by antibodies, and autoimmune POI is usually characterized by cellular infiltration of the theca cells of growing follicles by various inflammatory cells. Yet, other various factors and proteins of unknown clinical significance are present. The major diagnostic tool for otherwise idiopathic POI is the presence of autoantibodies against various ovarian components that strongly support the option of autoimmune etiology of POI. Treatment of the underlying cause of POI is the main strategy, although immunosuppressive therapy should be considered in a selected population of well-defined autoimmune POI and, as in idiopathic POI, in whom the resumption of ovarian activity is possible.

Comparison of clinical outcomes among dual ovarian stimulation, mild stimulation and luteal phase stimulation protocols in women with poor ovarian response

This study aimed to determine whether consecutive ovarian stimulation in follicular and luteal phases within a single menstrual cycle (dual stimulation) is achievable and superior to conventional stimulation for poor ovarian responders (PORs). Data of 260 PORs were retrospectively collected and divided into three groups. Group A comprised of cycles with dual ovarian stimulation (n = 76), which were divided into two subgroups (follicular [group A-F] and luteal phase stimulation [group A-L]); group B comprised of cycles with ovarian stimulation that was performed only in the luteal phase (n = 52). Group C comprised of mild ovarian stimulation cycles (n = 132). Baseline parameters were not different among the three groups. The numbers of oocytes and embryo obtained were less in group A-F than group B and C, while group A overall had significantly more oocytes and viable embryo retrieved than did group B and C. Group A-L consumed significantly less gonadotropin than group B, without compromising the number of retrieved oocytes and embryo. The pregnancy outcomes of transfer of embryo from different stimulation phases were similar. We conclude that dual ovarian stimulation protocol is effective and potentially optimal for PORs.

Ovulation Induction is a More Effective Stimulant on Antiovarian Antibody Production than In Vitro Fertilization

INTRODUCTION

Our aim in this study is to evaluate the effects of in vitro fertilization (IVF), including controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and the number of oocyte pick-up (OPU) procedures on the development of anti-ovarian antibodies (AOA).

METHODS

To evaluate the effects of IVF procedures, namely, COH and OPU, serum samples for measuring AOA concentration levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were collected on the third day of the menstrual cycle, at the end of the COH, and after OPU.

RESULTS

The AOA levels in IVF patients were significantly higher than the fertile control groups'. In the IVF group, neither COH nor OPU caused any increase in AOA levels when compared to the basal results. AOA levels were higher in patients with a history of 5-8 cycles of ovulation induction, before IVF treatment. There was no relationship between the basal AOA concentrations and the type of infertility, the etiology of infertility or the pregnancy outcomes, whereas there was a relationship between the AOA and the duration of infertility.

CONCLUSION

AOA levels of IVF patients were found to be higher than the fertile control groups'. AOA was found to be related to infertility in patients who had a longer duration of infertility and repeated ovulation induction procedures without IVF. COH and OPU during an IVF cycle did not cause an increase in AOA levels.

Transvaginal ovarian trauma, poor responders and improvement of success rates in IVF: anecdotal data and a hypothesis

In this report, we propose an intervention capable of improving IVF outcomes in subfertile women with poor ovarian response. This intervention derives from anecdotal data and observations in our daily practice, but most importantly from trials on experimental models and subfertile women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). Our hypothesis suggests that transvaginal induction of trauma to the ovary in the cycle preceding IVF should benefit poor ovarian responders and their lowered pregnancy rates by increasing - at least - the number of retrieved oocytes during oocyte retrieval. Up-to-the minute data show that, via this means, there is a unique response of the ovarian surface epithelium and stroma to the induced trauma. The potential pathways of this beneficial response involve an improvement of the raised gonadotrophins to act either through the mechanical reduction of the size of the ovary or through alterations of the hormonal profile by lowering LH, inhibin and local androgen concentrations through hypothalamic-pituitary axis feedbacks, the induction of increased blood flow to the ovaries, a differentiated local immune reaction and a non-elucidated as yet role of reactive oxygen species. In this report, we also describe the technique and the associated possible negative points while we try to point out the needed research steps to ensure its efficiency before it enters daily clinical practice.

HSP90 antibodies: a detrimental factor responsible for ovarian dysfunction

PROBLEM

Earlier studies from our group have established that about 47% cases of autoimmune ovarian failure are due to presence of autoantibodies to Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP90). However, there are no reports correlating pathological effects of HSP90 autoantibodies leading to ovarian failure.

METHOD OF STUDY

Antibodies to HSP90 in female mouse model were generated by active immunization with an immunodominant peptide of HSP90, followed by detailed analysis of several reproductive parameters.

RESULT

Estrous cyclicity remains unchanged; however, there was a significant drop in the fertility index due to an increase in pre- and post-implantation loss, associated with an increased incidence of degenerated eggs and embryos. The ovaries showed an increase in the number of empty and degenerated follicles and extensive granulosa cell deaths, which was reflected by the decrease in the levels of Nobox and Gja1 gene expression.

CONCLUSION

This study underlines a critical role played by HSP90 in ovarian folliculogenesis and highlights the implications of the presence of anti-HSP90 antibodies in infertile women.

Does ovarian autoimmunity play a role in the pathophysiology of premature ovarian insufficiency?

Premature Ovarian Failure (POF) is an important cause of amenorrhoea and infertility. However some women may spontaneously ovulate and conceive. Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is thus the preferred term. POF / POI is multifactorial in etiology. Autoimmunity is an important mechanism for accelerated destruction of ovarian follicles. The present review focuses on the role of autoimmunity in the pathophysiology of POI. Antibodies to multiple ovarian antigens have been proposed as markers of ovarian autoimmunity. However, there has been lack of clinically proven sensitive and specific serum tests to confirm autoimmune involvement in POI. The review details recently developed specific test for antiovarian antibodies (AOA) that has enabeled identification of different molecular antigenic targets in the ovary. The application of this specific test for AOA has brought to light the need for screening for autoimmunity prior to patients undergoing IVF technique.

Anti-HSP90 autoantibodies in sera of infertile women identify a dominant, conserved epitope EP6 (380-389) of HSP90 beta protein

BACKGROUND

We earlier reported a simple specific test for detection of anti-ovarian antibodies in infertile women and identified number of specific molecular and cellular targets of which human heat shock protein 90-beta (HSP90 beta) was found to be the most immunodominant. The present study focuses on prediction and validation of the immunodominant epitope/s of this protein using sera from infertile women having anti-HSP90 autoantibodies.

METHODS

Delineation of the immunodominant epitopes of HSP90 beta was done by using epitope prediction algorithms and 10 peptides (EP1-EP10) were custom synthesized. Their immunoreactivity was measured by ELISA using sera from patients and controls. To determine the most immunodominant epitope, the results were subjected to statistical analysis. The immunoreactivity of the immunodominant peptides were confirmed by dot blots using sera from patients. A rabbit polyclonal antibody against the immunodominant epitope was generated and its immunoreactivity to the parent protein in ovarian extracts as well in oocytes and embryos was investigated.

RESULTS

Experimentally and statistically, peptide EP6 (380-389) seems to be the major antigenic epitope for the serum antibody binding followed by EP1 (1-12) and EP8 (488-498). Predicted 3D structures of these peptides demonstrated that they exist in the loop conformation which is the most mobile part of the protein. Also, analysis of the sequences of HSP90 beta across several species reveals that EP6 peptide forms a part of a well conserved motif. The polyclonal antibody generated to the immunodominant epitope- EP6 confirms similar biochemical and cellular immunoreactivity as seen with the patients' sera having anti-HSP90 autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The decapeptide EP6 is a major immunogenic epitope of HSP90 followed by EP1 and EP8. Knowledge of binding epitopes on the autoantigen is necessary to understand the subsequent pathologic events. The study might generate new tools for the detection of disease-inducing epitopes and a possible therapeutic intervention.

Autoantigens in ovarian autoimmunity associated with unexplained infertility and premature ovarian failure

OBJECTIVE

To identify ovarian autoantigens associated with ovarian autoantibodies.

DESIGN

Hypothesis-generating prospective study.

SETTING

Urban infertility referral centers and academic research institution.

PATIENT(S)

Seventy-four patients with infertility, 19 patients with premature ovarian failure (POF), and 16 healthy control women.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Identification of autoantigens.

RESULT(S)

To identify major antigens for ovarian autoimmunity, sera from 74 women with unexplained infertility were screened for ovarian autoantibodies (AOAs) by immunoassay and one-dimensional Western blot. The majority of sera had immunoreactions at 50-56 kDa. Six representative positive infertility sera were used to identify antigens between 40 and 60 kD by two-dimensional Western blot and mass spectrometry. Antigens included aldehyde (retinal) dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH7A1), protein disulfide isomerase A3, vimentin, α-enolase, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, and selenium-binding protein 1 (SBP1). Sixty percent (24 out of 40) of infertility and POF sera were positive for recombinant ALDH1A1, SBP1, or enolase; 80.7% (21 out of 26) of AOA-positive sera had antibodies to one or more of the three antigens, and only 7% (1 out of 14) of AOA-negative sera had antibodies to recombinant proteins.

CONCLUSION(S)

ALDH1A1 and SBP1 are unique to ovarian autoimmunity associated with infertility and POF, and may provide the basis for specific tests to identify patients with ovarian autoimmunity.

Specific and Sensitive Immunoassays Detect Multiple Anti-ovarian Antibodies in Women With Infertility

Serum anti-ovarian antibodies (AOAs) have been shown in autoimmune premature ovarian failure and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cases. The specificity of assays detecting these antibodies has been questioned. Researchers have used several techniques (e.g., ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence). Few have reported on the non-specificity and the type of molecular and cellular targets. We reported earlier on the presence of naturally occurring anti-albumin antibodies as the likely factor for non-specificity. Having developed a novel blocking recipe, we show substantial elimination of this non-specificity. With these standardized tests, we hereby report multiple targets at protein and histological levels. In our study group, 15 of 50 (30%) patients with premature ovarian failure and 13 of 50 (26%) IVF-ET patients showed the presence of AOAs. Western blotting showed a large number of patients making AOAs to a 90-kDa protein, followed by 97- and 120-kDa proteins. Histochemically, it was evident that the sera of these patients predominantly react with the oocyte; other somatic cellular targets are also involved. The specific non-invasive test developed by us was found to be useful because it could carry out a reliable diagnosis of an autoimmune etiology that would be very helpful to select patients in whom immune-modulating therapy could be recommended, which in turn may restore ovarian function and fertility.

Corticosteroids in patients with antiovarian antibodies undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Antiovarian autoantibodies (AOA) have been associated with reproductive failure, especially in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Thus, the success rate of IVF might be improved by the use of corticosteroids. However, therapeutic trials with these drugs have yielded conflicting results, particularly because of heterogeneous inclusion criteria. Among women with previous IVF failure, we selected those who presented with a positive serum AOA assay, and analysed the efficacy of corticosteroids in improving the IVF outcome in these patients.

METHODS

One hundred patients with serum AOA detected by ELISA and at least two previously failed IVF attempts were selected. These patients underwent a further IVF cycle with 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone, started on the first day of the treatment cycle. In patients who became pregnant, corticosteroids were administered until the end of the first trimester of pregnancy and then progressively discontinued. AOA were assessed before and after oocyte retrieval. Clinical data of the corticosteroid-treated cycle were compared with data from the preceding IVF cycle for each patient.

RESULTS

No adverse effects resulting from corticosteroids were observed. Post oocyte retrieval antiovarian IgG were significantly lower in corticosteroid-treated attempts when compared with the preceding cycles. Twenty-six pregnancies resulted in the birth of 30 healthy children. The pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate were 38.8%, 17.8%, and 26.5% respectively in prednisolone-treated cycles.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the usefulness of corticosteroids in improving the success rate in a subset of patients with previous IVF failure and significant serum AOA levels.

[Ovarian autoimmunity and ovarian pathologies: antigenic targets and diagnostic significance]

The involvement of serum anti-ovarian autoantibodies (AOA) in ovarian pathology still remains controversial. In some cases of clinically patent ovarian failure, there seems to be a causal relationship between AOA and the ovarian disease. In patients with various organ-specific or systemic autoimmune diseases, or with unexplained, repeated reproductive failure, but otherwise normal ovarian function, it is even more difficult to determine the significance of AOA for several reasons: i) AOA recognize many different antigenic targets in the ovary ii) the antiovarian response may be transient or variable with time iii) the presence of AOA does not imply their aetiopathogenic role in the disease. The present paper reviews the clinical significance of AOA based on their ovarian targets as far as they have been identified until now.

IgG, IgA and IgM Antibodies against FSH: Serological Markers of Pathogenic Autoimmunity or of Normal Immunoregulation?

PROBLEM

Autoimmune mechanisms are often involved in causing infertility. Among the possible targets of autoantibodies, the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) which regulates the follicular maturation in human ovary is a promising candidate. We aimed to study whether anti-FSH-antibodies might be involved in different clinical types of infertility.

METHOD OF STUDY

The study group consisted of 178 patients (75 with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), 103 with endometriosis) and 75 pregnant women. Female blood donors formed the control group (n = 85). Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests were performed using purified FSH as antigens and a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 78-93 region (V14D) of the human FSH beta-chain.

CONCLUSION

We showed that anti-FSH-antibodies were present in controls and their production decreased during pregnancy. Endometriosis and PCOS were associated with higher values of anti-FSH-immunoglobulin (Ig)A, anti-V14D-IgA, and endometriosis with anti-V14D-IgG. Our data suggest that anti-FSH-IgA could be a marker of ovarian disorders that cause infertility.

Antibodies against granulosa luteinized cells and their targets in women attending IVF program

PROBLEM

The study was conducted to investigate the presence and the possible role of anti-granulosa luteinized cells (GLCs) antibodies in infertile patients, attending in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, as well as to attempt the identification of putative target antigens.

METHOD OF STUDY

A total of 101 sera from infertile women (patient group) and 33 sera from fertile women (control group) were investigated. The patients were divided in subgroups according to: ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COHS)--poor responders and good responders; fertilization rate--low fertilization rate and high fertilization rate. The relation between embryo transfer (ET) outcome and prevalence of anti-GLC antibodies was investigated too. NONIDET P-40 (NP-40) and whole-GLC lysates, as antigenic materials, were used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting, respectively.

RESULTS

Based on the cut-off value of 2 S.D. above the control mean value, the prevalence of patients positive for anti-GLC antibodies was found to be 28.7% (29/101) compared with 9.1% (3/33) in control fertile women (P < 0.05). Anti-GLC antibodies were detected in 54.8% (17/31) of women with low fertilization rate compared with 15.7% (11/70) of women with high fertilization rate (P = 0.003) and it was established that women positive for anti-GLC antibodies had lower fertilization rate, than those negative for anti-GLC antibodies. Immunoblotting has demonstrated a number of GLC proteins with molecular masses (MM) of 110, 70-80, 47 and 37 kDa, frequently reacting with anti-GLC antibodies in patient's sera, as possible targets.

CONCLUSION

The presented results on the prevalence and role of anti-GLC antibodies, as well as the data on the target antigens confirmed our hypothesis about the potential involvement of GLC antigens in some cases of immunological infertility in IVF patients.

Gonadal antibodies interfering with female reproduction

While the involvement of anti-ovarian antibodies (AOAs) is highly likely, yet still controversial, in patients with patent premature ovarian failure (POF), it is even more difficult--for several reasons--to ascertain the clinical significance of these antibodies in patients without obvious ovarian failure. First, AOAs form a heterogeneous group of antibodies recognizing several different antigenic targets such as granulosa and thecal cells, zona pellucida, oocyte cytoplasm, corpus luteum, as well as gonadotrophins and their receptors. Second, the detection of AOAs in various clinical situations does not readily imply a causal relationship between these antibodies and impaired ovarian function. Third, diagnostic tools for detecting AOAs and their molecular targets have to be improved to yield more reliable data and allow a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of AOAs. Preliminary results with immunosuppressive therapy in selected AOA patients have been encouraging, but randomized trials have to be performed.

[What are the antigenic targets in the ovary?]

The ovary can be the target of an autoimmune disease involving many different autoantigens. The clinical feature of this disease often results in premature ovarian failure or infertility and may be either isolated or associated with other autoimmune pathologies, especially with adrenal autoimmunity. The diagnosis of an autoimmune mechanism relies on the presence of anti-ovarian antibodies, whose prevalence is quite variable according to the different methods used to detect them, and to the different stages of the disease. In addition, their clinical significance is not always clear, as to their pathologic or epiphenomenal nature. However, the study of these autoantibodies has led to the identification of some of their antigenic targets which have to be known for a better understanding of the pathologic mechanisms involved. This paper reviews anti-steroid producing cells, anti-gonadotrophin receptor, anti-gonadotrophin, anti-corpus luteum, anti-zona pellucida and anti-oocyte antibodies.

Anticorps anti-ovaires et fécondation in vitro : cause ou conséquence ?

OBJECTIVES

To assess anti-ovarian antibodies (AOA) in serum samples at various times of in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempts to determine whether ovarian stimulation could result in the production of such autoantibodies in women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study on 134 patients and 138 IVF cycles using a classical long protocol. For each attempt, four serum samples were obtained, respectively, at the onset of downrelation (S1), end of downregulation (S13), after 7 days of follicular stimulation (S21) and the day of follicular puncture (SP). Five hundred and fifty two samples were tested with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for three isotypes (IgG, IgA, IgM) of AOA.

RESULTS

In the whole group, mean concentrations of AOA for each isotype were compared group by group: S1-S13, S1-S21, S1-SP, S13-S21, S13-SP, S21-SP. Not any significant difference was observed whatever the isotype considered.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study shows the absence of influence of endogenous or exogenous ovarian stimulation by gonadotropins on anti-ovarian autoimmunity.

Premature ovarian failure associated with autoimmune polyglandular syndrome: pathophysiological mechanisms and future fertility

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune polyglandular syndromes (APS) are a series of disorders characterized by autoimmunity against two or more endocrine organs. Premature ovarian failure (POF) may also have an autoimmune origin and, when accompanied by other autoimmune endocrinopathies, may be part of the APSs. Onset of autoimmune ovarian failure usually occurs in childhood, adolescence, or adulthood, and as a result, fertility may be severely compromised.

CASE REPORT

A 26-year-old women with secondary amenorrhea, Addison's disease, and autoimmune hypothyroidism requested infertility evaluation. Examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, endocrine evaluation, and ovarian biopsy were performed. 21-Hydroxylase and antithyroid antibodies were demonstrated, but ovarian steroid cell antibodies (StCA) were absent at the time of her infertility evaluation. Transvaginal sonography demonstrated only a few ovarian follicles. An ovarian biopsy revealed lymphocytic infiltration of the ovary. This presentation is consistent with APS type II accompanied by autoimmune POF.

DISCUSSION

Unlike APS types I and III, autoimmune POF is more commonly encountered with APS types I and III than with APS type II. An autoimmune response to steroidogenic enzymes and ovarian steroid cells appears to mediate destruction of ovarian function. Although immunotherapy with corticosteroids (with or without in vitro fertilization [IVF]) may be successful in limited cases where several follicles are present, oocyte donation with IVF may be the best option for the patient seeking fertility, particularly in the absence of ovarian follicles.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in molecular genetics may be valuable in predicting and counseling women at risk for APS and POF, and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue may offer hope to affected unmarried young women. It is reasonable to suggest that children and reproductive aged women with one autoimmune disorder should be periodically screened for other autoimmune disorders.

Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein B-cell responses in multiple sclerosis

Humoral auto-immunity to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is likely involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). In 44 MS patients and 30 controls, Ig-producing B cells were identified by their isotype and as MOG-specific spot-forming cells (SFC). Peripheral anti-MOG antibodies were assayed in ELISA as well as anti-butyrophilin antibodies to investigate for molecular mimicry. MS patients had significantly higher levels of IgA- and MOG-SFC than controls, as well as significantly higher antibody responses to MOG and butyrophilin. These data provide added support for the implication of anti-MOG humoral immunity in the pathophysiology of MS, and suggest a balance of systemic (anti-self) and mucosal (environment-modulated) immune reactions in an attempt at regulating the pathogenic specific immune response.

Ovarian autoimmune disease and ovarian autoantibodies

Detection of specific autoantibodies remains the most practical clinical and research marker of autoimmune disease. The lack of consensus on ovary specific antibodies as a marker for ovarian autoimmunity has clinical and research consequences. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence for ovarian autoimmunity and the detection of ovary specific autoantibodies in humans. Evidence favors the presence of an autoimmune disease of the ovary. Ovarian autoantibodies are associated primarily with premature ovarian failure (POF) and unexplained infertility. Variations in detection of ovarian autoantibodies are likely to be due to study design elements such as antibody test format, antigen preparation, and criteria for study and comparison groups. In addition, multiple targets appear to be involved in ovarian autoimmunity including ovarian cellular elements and oocyte related antigens. Many studies only assess one target antigen, leaving individuals with ovarian autoimmunity unidentified. The next most significant advance in characterizing ovarian autoimmunity will be definitive identification of the specific antigens and development of standardized tests based on use of specific antigens.

Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles on ovarian response

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles on the ovarian response in patients treated with human menopausal gonadotropins and GnRH agonists.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENT(S)

Three thousand two hundred forty-nine patients who had completed at least two in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles (minimum two, maximum six cycles per patient).

INTERVENTION(S)

Nine thousand three hundred seventy-nine repeated IVF/ICSI cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Mean number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved per cycle, mean number of ampules used per attempt.

RESULT(S)

Repeated ART cycles did not exert a significant effect on the mean number of COC retrieved per attempt in contrast to maternal age, which was inversely related to the mean number of COC retrieved in all cycles performed. Across repeated ART attempts, an increase in the mean number of ampules used per cycle was observed. This was due to an effect of maternal age, which increased in line with the mean number of ampules used per cycle, as well as to an age-independent effect of repeated cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

An age-independent deterioration of the ovarian response appears to occur across repeated ART cycles.

An immunoreactive peptide of the FSH involved in autoimmune infertility

The purpose of this study was to identify autoantigens contained in human ovary extracts. Serum samples from 36 infertile women with anti-ovary antibodies as detected with an ELISA technique were tested in Western blot against human ovary extracts. A reactive protein with a molecular mass matching that of the FSH was detected in 34 cases. These serum samples also reacted strongly in Western blot and ELISA with purified FSH and, in immunofluorescence, with pituitary cells. Using the Pepscan approach, with overlapping peptides matching the amino acid sequence of the human FSH beta-chain, several immunoreactive regions were evidenced. The 78-93 amino acid sequence of the human FSH beta-chain appeared as one of the major epitopes. Synthetic peptides of this region were prepared and demonstrated to react with human serum samples from women with anti-ovary antibodies. These data demonstrate that FSH can be an autoantigen, recognized by autoantibodies associated with infertility.

[From pathological diagnosis to ovulation induction. The case of ovarian insufficiency]

The incidence of premature ovarian failure (POF) is around 1 to 3%. This pathology occurs in young women, who often wish to become pregnant. Theoretically, two mechanisms could be involved: initial follicle depletion and follicle dysfunction. However, in some cases, mixed mechanisms are involved. Initially, PFO was considered irreversible. In fact, signs of intermittent ovarian function in normal karyotypically women have been described, but predicting the probability of spontaneous remission in a specific woman is impossible. Therefore, various treatments for ovulation induction have been proposed to these patients. Most of the pregnancies occur after hormone replacement therapy. The action of this treatment is unclear and the cause-and-effect relation has not been proven by prospective, randomized studies. The benefit of suppressing endogen gonadotropins by GnRH agonists is not proven either. Estrogen supplementation and high-dose gonadotropin ovarian stimulation protocols have been proposed. Even so, this therapy cannot be recommended because of the lack of controlled studies. Finally, numerous case reports have described the return of ovarian function after using immunosuppressive therapies. The lack of particular criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune mechanisms have lead to treat heterogeneous groups of patients. No randomized controlled studies with immunologic monitorage have been performed that could establish the success of this therapy. Therefore, in order to find effective treatments, basic pathophysiologic mechanisms must be better understood. For those women who want to become pregnant, the lack of prospective, randomized studies cannot lead to formal conclusions. Depending on the patients' age and history, it appears reasonable to attempt a corrective therapy based on defined etiology, before entering in a donor oocyte program.

The possible role of antiovary antibodies in repeated in vitro fertilization failures

PROBLEM

The study was conducted to investigate the possible role of circulating ovarian autoantibodies (ov-ab) in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) failure and to evaluate the effectiveness of immunosuppression treatment in these patients.

METHOD OF STUDY

The study group comprised 80 IVF patients who had five or more failed treatment cycles (mean 10.2; range 7-22). The presence of ov-ab was compared between these women and 1) 50 IVF patients who conceived during the first three treatment cycles; 2) 50 healthy nulligravidae. All participants were seronegative to nonorgan-specific and antithyroid autoantibodies. Patients in the study group who were positive for ov-ab were treated with 10 mg/day prednisone starting 1 month before ovulation induction. Embryo grading was compared in the IVF cycles before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Ov-ab were found in ten patients (12.5%) in the study group, compared to none in the control groups (P = 0.01). Nine of the patients positive for ov-ab were treated with prednisone for their following cycle. A statistically significant improvement in embryo grading was noted. Three patients conceived after treatment (33%), with a take-home baby rate of 22%, compared to only six patients (8.6%) who conceived among the rest of the seronegative study group, with a take-home baby rate of 7.1% (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ov-ab are a possible marker of an autoimmune disorder that may be one of the causes of repeated IVF failures. Immunosuppression treatment may prove efficient in ov-ab seropositive patients with repeated IVF failures by improving embryo grading and pregnancy rate.

Ovarian autoimmunity: greater frequency of autoantibodies in premature menopause and unexplained infertility than in the general population

The objective of this study was to: (1) assess the relative prevalence of ovarian, thyroid, nuclear, and cardiolipin antibodies associated with premature menopause and unexplained infertility and (2) compare ovarian and thyroid antibodies in premature menopause, unexplained infertility, and the general population. Autoantibodies were evaluated in women with premature menopause (n = 30), unexplained infertility with (n = 38) or without (n = 15) prior gonadotropin-induced ovulation, and normal cycling controls (n = 12) and in a population of women obtained from a blood bank (n = 53). Antibodies to ovary (OVAB), thyroid (THYAB; thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin), cardiolipin, and eight nuclear antigens were assessed by enzyme immunoassay. Organ-specific antibodies (ovary and thyroid) were present with significantly greater frequency than non-organ-specific antibodies (nuclear and cardiolipin) in premature menopause and unexplained infertility (60% (50/83) vs 16% (13/83) respectively; P < 0.0001). OVAB (53%, 44/83) were significantly more frequent than THYAB (30%, 25/83) in premature menopause and unexplained infertility (P = 0.0030). THYAB did not differ among all groups (P = 0.78). In premature menopause and treated or untreated unexplained infertility OVAB frequencies were 53, 61, and 33%, respectively, and were significantly more frequent than in the population (17%) (P = 0.0001). In unexplained infertility, individuals with no prior gonadotropin-induced ovulation had a lower frequency of OVAB than treated individuals (P = 0.07). The frequency distribution of optical density values for OVAB was significantly higher for premature menopause and unexplained infertility than for population or normal cycling women (P < 0.0001). Thus, only ovarian antibodies were significantly more frequent than other antibody markers of autoimmunity in premature menopause and unexplained infertility.

Autoimmunity and reproduction

OBJECTIVE

To review the association between autoimmunity and reproductive failure.

DESIGN

A MEDLINE search done from 1965 to 1996. More than 300 original and review articles were evaluated, from which the most relevant were selected.

RESULT(S)

Autoimmune processes now are accepted widely as one of the possible mechanisms of many human diseases. The presence of autoimmune disorders has been associated repeatedly with reproductive failure. On the other hand, reproductive failure may be the first manifestation of autoimmune disorders.

CONCLUSION(S)

When abnormal autoantibody levels are present in women with reproductive failure, the reproductive failure alone should be considered as one of the possible clinical expressions of autoimmune disorders. Two relevant questions of whether these patients should be treated for autoimmunity remain unsolved. A prospective, placebo-controlled trial is necessary to evaluate the importance of any treatment.

Human autoantibodies recognizing human and mouse preimplantation stages

PROBLEM

To find out whether autoantibodies against human preimplantation stages are present in some human sera and, if so, whether the antibodies could be capable to affect the egg development and/or to trigger an activation of the complement system at the procedures of assisted conception.

METHODS

1. Immunohistochemistry on blots of human preimplantation stages. 2. Immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections of human and mouse preimplantation stages. 3. Culture of mouse morulae to analyze complement activation.

RESULTS

1. Some human sera contained autoantibodies against human preimplantation stages. 2. Human-mouse cross-reacting antibodies against preimplantation stages occurred. 3. Immune complexes, formed on mouse preimplantation stages, activated the complement systems in egg cultures, resulting in a damaging of the eggs.

CONCLUSION

The presence of natural autoantibodies to preimplantation stages may be associated with reproduction failure, caused by a direct effect by the autoantibodies and/or an activation of the uterine complement system by the immune complexes formed.

Circulating ovarian autoantibodies and FSH and LH levels in adolescent girls with primary menstrual cycle disorders

Seventy three adolescent patients with primary menstrual disturbances were studied by immunofluorescent methods for prevalence of ovarian autoantibodies (O-Ab), the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for examination of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) hormonal levels was used. Clinically healthy girls (40) served as controls. Patients were divided into a group of 13 girls with primary amenorrhea (PA) and a group of 60 girls with oligo and/or secondary amenorrhea (OSA). In the PA group 38.5% positivity linked to ooplasm (OO), zona pellucida (ZP), and membrana granulosa cells (MG), as well as 46.2% to theca folliculi interna (TI) and 53.8% to lutein cells (LC), was detected. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) of LH levels between OO immunopositive and negative girls (19.0 and 9.4 mU/ml) were found, while FSH values were not different. In the OSA group a 16.7% positivity linked to OO, 23.3% to ZP and MG, 38.3% to TI, and 58.3% to LC were detected. Significant linkage between MG immunopositive and negative girls and FSH:LH ratio values were estimated. FSH values were significantly different (p < .05) for PA and OSA groups (23.7 and 6.7 IU/l) which corresponded particularly with higher findings of Ab in germ line-cells (OO-, ZP-, and MG-Ab). A striking correlation between evidence of O-Ab and menstrual cycle irregularities was found. It could support a possible coincidence of autoimmune mechanism in these dysfunctions. Localization of O-Ab-binding was verified at the electron microscopic level.

Antiovarian antibodies and their effect on the outcome of assisted reproduction

PURPOSE

To compare the presence in levels of antiovarian antibodies (AOAb) in the pre- and postovulatory stage from serum of infertile patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) with outcome of the procedures.

RESULTS

Serum from 36 women undergoing IUI, 36 women undergoing IVF and 25 fertile, healthy controls were assayed for the presence of AOAb by a commercially available ELISA kit. AOAb was positive in 59.7% of infertile women, while none of the fertile controls were positive for AOAb. The levels of these antibodies increased as the patient age and the number of treatment attempts increased. Though the presence of AOAb did not affect oocyte recovery rate, it resulted in decreased fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and pregnancy rate in infertile women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies suggest that AOAb may be a cause of infertility and presence of these antibodies could have adverse effects on the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques.

Subfertility in the era of assisted reproduction: changes and consequences

OBJECTIVE

To review the major changes that have occurred during the last decade of assisted reproduction technology (ART) practice, looking at the various conditions that cause subfertility.

DESIGN

A short review describing the progress that has been made during the last decade of ART practice, analyzing the various conditions that cause subfertility, is presented. The efficacy of ART as a treatment of these conditions is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Assisted reproductive technology currently is used for a wide range of indications and has become an acceptable tool in the treatment of subfertile couples. Yet, there is an ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of ART versus conventional treatment for the various conditions that cause subfertility. The effectiveness of IVF in terms of pregnancy rate (PR) was demonstrated only for patients with severe bilateral tubal disease and male subfertility. For couples with other causes of infertility the differences in PRs do not reach statistical significance, and the efficacy of IVF has not been demonstrated clearly to date. Moreover, much of the discussion about management of subfertility has centered on costs of ART and the cost-benefit of ART versus conventional therapy for subfertility. It has been shown that, in women with unexplained infertility, menotropin treatment is as successful, less expensive, and carries a smaller risk than the surgical approach used in ART. However, the exact role of ART in the management of polycystic ovarian syndrome, immunological infertility, and endometriosis still is to be determined. Yet, as embryo implantation after ART still is considerably lower than that of fertile couples who conceive naturally, we expect that the next major thrust improving the effectiveness of ART will occur after future elucidation of factors influencing embryonic implantation.

Defining and interpreting pregnancy success rates for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVES

To review current practice in describing pregnancy success rates after IVF-ET, to identify issues associated with interpreting these rates, and to suggest useful methods of describing these rates in the future.

DESIGN

Review of literature concerning medical, epidemiologic, and statistical aspects of reporting IVF-ET pregnancy success rates.

SETTING

The United States.

PATIENTS

Infertile couples participating in IVF-ET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Usefulness and accuracy of IVF-ET pregnancy reporting.

RESULTS

Several groups have collected information on the pregnancy success rates of IVF-ET clinics and have discussed appropriate definitions of pregnancy success. The largest of these groups in the United States is The American Fertility Society and its affiliate, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The number of live deliveries per 100 ET procedures and the number of live deliveries per 100 egg retrieval procedures are among the most commonly used definitions.

CONCLUSION

The most commonly used definitions are particularly useful for describing the probability that a live infant will be delivered after IVF-ET is completed. To measure the effectiveness of the IVF-ET procedures and the costs of undergoing IVF-ET, other definitions are also important. Success rates need to be stratified by patient characteristics, such as age, that affect the probability of success.

What do we really know about autoantibody abnormalities and reproductive failure: a critical review

CONDENSATION

The diagnosis and treatment of autoantibody-associated forms of reproductive failure is critically reviewed.

OBJECTIVE

To critically evaluate the published literature in reference to autoantibody-associated forms of reproductive failure.

LOCATION

Medical School-affiliated private Infertility Center.

MATERIALS

A review of over 200 published papers reflecting on the topic.

RESULTS

Autoantibody associated reproductive failure, characterized by a decrease in fecundity and an increase in the risk of pregnancy loss, appears established. Autoantibody abnormalities, as routinely detected by standard laboratory assays, are, however, neither immunologically nor biologically specific since cross reactivities between autoantibodies are frequent and a specific autoantibody may cause a biological effect in one but not in another affected individual.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of autoantibody abnormalities in all cases of suspected autoimmune-associated reproductive failure is valuable and will improve clinical care of affected patients. Clinicians need, however, to recognize the limitations of autoantibody testing and have to adjust their clinical management to the degree and quality of autoantibody evaluation available to them in their community.

Immunological factors in infertility

Immune infertility can result from destruction of gametes by antisperm antibodies (ASA) or anti-ovary antibodies, by inhibition of sperm-zona pellucida binding by ASA, or by prevention of embryo cleavage and early development. Condoms, immunosuppressive therapy, sperm processing, and intrauterine insemination have been widely applied, but with controversial results.