The effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on the ovarian response and in vitro fertilization results in polycystic ovarian syndrome: a prospective study

Strategies for improving outcome of assisted reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify, appraise and summarize the current evidence regarding the efficacy of strategies aimed at improving assisted reproductive techniques in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the standard medical databases was performed. The last electronic search was run in July 2015. The primary outcome measures were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage.

RESULTS

We screened 1021 records and completely assessed 173, finally including 66 studies in the quantitative analysis. Many different interventions were assessed, however the overall quality of the studies was low. We observed moderate-quality evidence that there is no clinically relevant difference in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (relative risk (RR), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.84-1.08)), or clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.91-1.15)) when comparing antagonist and agonist protocols for ovarian stimulation. Additionally, we found low-quality evidence that metformin improves live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.01-1.63)) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR, 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04-1.53)) when compared with placebo or no intervention. We further found low-quality evidence that there is no clinically relevant difference in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (RR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.80-1.34)) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.81-1.22)) when comparing human menopausal gonadotropin for inducing ovulation and artificial preparation with estradiol valerate for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer (FET). Low-quality evidence suggests that mannitol compared with no intervention (RR, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.39-0.77)) and antagonist protocols compared with agonist protocols (RR, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.80)) reduce rates of OHSS.

CONCLUSION

There is low- to moderate-quality evidence suggesting that antagonist protocols are preferable to agonist ones, because they reduce the incidence of OHSS without interfering with clinical pregnancy and live birth for women with PCOS. Additionally there is low-quality evidence pointing to a benefit of metformin supplementation on clinical pregnancy and live birth; and that ovulation induction and administration of estradiol seem to be equally effective for endometrial preparation before FET for women with PCOS. For all other interventions, the evidence is of very low quality, not allowing any meaningful conclusions to be drawn. Estrategias para mejorar el resultado de la reproducción asistida en mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis RESUMEN OBJETIVOS: Identificar, evaluar y resumir la evidencia actual sobre la eficacia de las estrategias para mejorar las técnicas de reproducción asistida en mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico (SOP). MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva de literatura en las bases de datos médicas estándar. La última búsqueda electrónica se realizó en julio de 2015. Las medidas de resultado primarias fueron los nacimientos vivos/embarazos en curso y el síndrome de hiperestimulación ovárica (SHO). Las medidas de resultado secundarias fueron el embarazo confirmado ecográficamente y el aborto.

RESULTADOS

Se cribaron 1021 registros, de los que se evaluaron por completo 173, para finalmente incluir 66 estudios en el análisis cuantitativo. Aunque se evaluaron muchas intervenciones diferentes, en general la calidad de los estudios fue baja. Se observó evidencia de calidad moderada de que no hay diferencias relevantes clínicamente en las tasas de nacimientos vivos/embarazos en curso (riesgo relativo (RR): 0,95 (IC 95%, 0,84-1,08)), o de embarazos confirmados ecográficamente (RR: 1,02 (IC 95%, 0,91-1,15)), cuando se comparan los protocolos de antagonistas y agonistas para la estimulación ovárica. Además, se encontró evidencia de baja calidad en que la metformina mejora las tasas de nacimientos vivos/embarazos en curso (RR: 1,28 (IC 95%, 1,01-1,63)) y de embarazos confirmados ecográficamente (RR: 1,26 (IC 95%, 1,04-1,53)) en comparación con un placebo o la no intervención. Se encontró también evidencia de baja calidad en que no hay diferencias relevantes clínicamente en las tasas de nacimientos vivos/embarazos en curso (RR: 1,03 (IC 95%, 0,80-1,34)) y las tasas de embarazos confirmados ecográficamente (RR: 0,99 (IC 95%, 0.81-1,22)) al comparar la gonadotropina menopáusica humana para la inducción de la ovulación y la preparación artificial con el valerato de estradiol para preparar el endometrio para la transferencia de embriones congelados (TEC). La baja calidad de la evidencia sugiere que el manitol, en comparación con la no intervención (RR: 0,54 (IC 95%, 0,39-0,77)), y los protocolos de antagonistas, en comparación con los protocolos de agonistas (RR: 0,63 (IC 95%, 0,49-0,80)), reducen las tasas de SHO. CONCLUSIÓN: Hay evidencia de calidad baja a moderada que sugiere que los protocolos de antagonistas son preferibles a los de agonistas, ya que reducen la tasa de SHO sin interferir con el embarazo confirmado ecográficamente y los nacimientos vivos en las mujeres con SOP. Además, existe evidencia de baja calidad que indica un beneficio del uso de metformina como aporte suplementario en embarazos confirmados ecográficamente y en nacimientos vivos; y que la inducción de la ovulación y la administración de estradiol parecen ser igualmente eficaces para la preparación del endometrio antes de la TEC en mujeres con SOP. Para el resto de procedimientos, la evidencia es de muy baja calidad, y por ello no permite extraer conclusiones importantes.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are commonly used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinising hormone surge during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) prior to planned oocyte retrieval, thus optimising the chances of live birth.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of the different GnRHa protocols as adjuncts to COH in women undergoing ART cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to April 2015: the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and registries of ongoing trials. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two protocols of GnRHa used in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in subfertile women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted the data. The primary outcome measure was number of live births or ongoing pregnancies per woman/couple randomised. Secondary outcome measures were number of clinical pregnancies, number of oocytes retrieved, dose of gonadotrophins used, adverse effects (pregnancy losses, ovarian hyperstimulation, cycle cancellation, and premature luteinising hormone (LH) surges), and cost and acceptability of the regimens. We combined data to calculate odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I² statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 37 RCTs (3872 women), one ongoing trial, and one trial awaiting classification. These trials made nine different comparisons between protocols. Twenty of the RCTs compared long protocols and short protocols. Only 19/37 RCTs reported live birth or ongoing pregnancy.There was no conclusive evidence of a difference between a long protocol and a short protocol in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.81; 12 RCTs, n = 976 women, I² = 15%, low quality evidence). Our findings suggest that in a population in which 14% of women achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a short protocol, between 13% and 23% will achieve live birth or ongoing pregnancy using a long protocol. There was evidence of an increase in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.92; 20 RCTs, n = 1643 women, I² = 27%, moderate quality evidence) associated with the use of a long protocol.There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in terms of live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates when the following GnRHa protocols were compared: long versus ultrashort protocol (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.36; one RCT, n = 150 women, low quality evidence), long luteal versus long follicular phase protocol (OR 1.89, 95% CI 0.87 to 4.10; one RCT, n = 223 women, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was stopped versus when it was continued (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.33; three RCTs, n = 290 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when the dose of GnRHa was reduced versus when the same dose was continued (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.52; four RCTs, n = 407 women, I² = 0%, low quality evidence), when GnRHa was discontinued versus continued after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in the long protocol (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.64; one RCT, n = 181 women, low quality evidence), and when administration of GnRHa lasted for two versus three weeks before stimulation (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.68; one RCT, n = 85 women, low quality evidence). Our primary outcomes were not reported for any other comparisons.Regarding adverse events, there were insufficient data to enable us to reach any conclusions except about the cycle cancellation rate. There was no conclusive evidence of a difference in cycle cancellation rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.55; 11 RCTs, n = 1026 women, I² = 42%, low quality evidence) when a long protocol was compared with a short protocol. This suggests that in a population in which 9% of women would have their cycles cancelled using a short protocol, between 5.5% and 14% will have cancelled cycles when using a long protocol.The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to low. The main limitations in the evidence were failure to report live birth or ongoing pregnancy, poor reporting of methods in the primary studies, and imprecise findings due to lack of data. Only 10 of the 37 included studies were conducted within the last 10 years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When long GnRHa protocols and short GnRHa protocols were compared, we found no conclusive evidence of a difference in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates, but there was moderate quality evidence of higher clinical pregnancy rates in the long protocol group. None of the other analyses showed any evidence of a difference in birth or pregnancy outcomes between the protocols compared. There was insufficient evidence to make any conclusions regarding adverse effects.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are used in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles to prevent a luteinizing hormone surge. Various protocols have been described in the literature, such as long protocols (continuous and stop or reduce dose, long luteal, or long follicular protocol); short protocols and ultrashort protocols.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective GnRHa protocol as an adjuvant to gonadotrophins in ART cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAHL and PsycINFO. Reference lists of relevant articles were also searched. All the searches were updated to August 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials comparing any two protocols of GnRHa in in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was live births per women. Secondary outcome measures were pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, number of oocytes retrieved and amount of gonadotrophins used. Data were independently extracted in 2 x 2 tables by two authors. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated after verifying the presence of homogeneity of treatment effect across all trials. For continuous variables mean differences (MD) were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 29 included studies, 17 compared long with short protocols; two compared long with ultrashort protocols; four compared a follicular versus luteal start of GnRHa; three compared continuation versus stopping the GnRHa at the start of stimulation; three compared continuation of the same dose versus reduced dose of GnRHa and one compared a short versus short stop protocol.There was no evidence of a difference in the live birth rate but this outcome was only reported by three studies.There was evidence of a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.93) in a long protocol when compared to a short protocol. That is there is a 50% increase in chance of achieving pregnancy if a long protocol is used as compared to a short protocol, although this difference could range from 16% to 93% increased chance of pregnancy. This difference did not persist when the meta-analysis was done only on the studies with adequate randomisation (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.05).There was evidence of an increased number of oocytes (MD 1.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.04) obtained when a long protocol was used as compared to a short protocol. That is there is a 60% increase in the number of oocytes retrieved when a long protocol is used as compared to a short protocol, although this difference could range from 18% to 304% more oocytes.There was evidence of an increase (MD 12.90, 95% CI 3.29 to 22.51) in the requirement for gonadotrophins in long as compared to short protocols. That is approximately 12.9 more ampoules of gonadotrophins were consumed when a long protocol was used as compared to a short protocol. This difference could range from 3.29 to 22.51 more gonadotrophin ampoules.There was no evidence of a difference in any of the outcome measures for luteal versus follicular start of GnRHa and stopping versus continuation of GnRHa at the start of stimulation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The pregnancy rate was found to be higher when GnRHa was used in a long protocol as compared to a short or ultrashort protocol. There was no evidence of a difference in live birth rate, but this outcome was only reported by three studies. There was no evidence of a difference in the outcomes amongst various long protocols; nor that stopping or reducing GnRHa at the start of stimulation was associated with a reduced pregnancy rate. For all comparison, except a long versus short protocol, there was a lack of power.

IVF outcome in anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2)--including polycystic ovary syndrome--following previous unsuccessful ovulation induction

This follow-up study represents IVF treatment characteristics and outcomes in women with World Health Organization (WHO) group 2 anovulatory infertility after previous unsuccessful ovulation induction compared with controls. Furthermore, the possibility of initial screening parameters of these anovulatory women to predict IVF outcome was examined. Twenty-six patients with WHO 2 anovulatory infertility who failed to achieve a live birth following previous induction of ovulation (using clomiphene citrate as first line and exogenous FSH as second line) were compared with 26 IVF patients with tubal infertility matched for age, treatment period and treatment regimen. The WHO 2 patients underwent 49 IVF cycles, whereas the normo-ovulatory controls underwent 46 cycles. In WHO 2 patients 15 cycles were cancelled compared with six cycles in controls (P = 0.04). Cycles were predominantly cancelled due to insufficient response (P = 0.04). In cases in whom the cycle was cancelled, body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in WHO 2 women compared with controls. Overall live birth rates were comparable (P = 0.9). Obese women suffering from WHO 2 anovulatory infertility are at an increased risk of having their IVF cycle cancelled due to insufficient response. Once oocyte retrieval is achieved, live birth rates are comparable with controls.

Comparison between a single dose of goserelin (depot) and multiple daily doses of leuprolide acetate for pituitary suppression in IVF treatment: a clinical endocrinological study of the ovarian response

PURPOSE

Compare the efficacy and safety of two different GnRHa, used for pituitary suppression in IVF cycles.

METHODS

A total of 292 patients using depot goserelin (Group 1) and 167 using daily leuprolide acetate (Group 2) were compared. Days required to achieve pituitary function suppression, duration of ovarian stimulation, total dose of HMG, number of aspirated follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, and presence of functional ovarian cyst were analyzed.

RESULTS

The time taken to achieve downregulation was similar. The mean number of ampoules used for superovulation was higher in Group 1; however, this difference was observed only for patients >40 years old that started GnRHa in the follicular phase. There was no difference between the two groups in the duration of superovulation, in the number of follicles aspirated, and the number of oocytes retrieved. In the group of patients with >40 years the incidence of ovarian cysts was higher in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Both routes of GnRHa have similar effects for pituitary suppression and ovulation induction in assisted reproductive technology. Therefore the long-acting GnRHa is an excellent option, as only a single subcutaneous dose is necessary, decreasing the risk of the patient to forget its use and, most important, it does not interfere in the patient's quality of life.

Effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists on human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo and in vitro-results of a prospective, randomized in-vitro fertilization study

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the effects of two gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, buserelin and triptorelin, on human ovarian follicular steroidogenesis, oocyte fertilization and IVF treatment outcome. Ovulatory, healthy women undergoing IVF were treated either with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) alone or with HMG and one of the two GnRH agonists. Serum and follicular fluid hormonal concentrations and cultures of luteinizing granulosa cells obtained during follicular aspiration were analysed. GnRH agonist treatment significantly affected steroidogenesis both in serum and follicular fluid. In follicular fluid, progesterone and oestradiol concentrations were significantly elevated while testosterone concentrations were significantly lower in the triptorelin group. The ratios of testosterone/progesterone, oestradiol/progesterone but not oestradiol/testosterone concentrations were significantly affected by GnRH agonist administration. Similarly, the steroidogenic activity of luteinizing granulosa cells in vitro was significantly decreased in women treated with GnRH agonists. Women treated with GnRH agonists had significantly more fertilized oocytes and cleaving embryos. The results indicate a marked effect of GnRH agonists on the pattern of ovarian follicular steroidogenesis that cannot be explained solely by changes in gonadotrophin concentrations.

The significance of high follicular-phase luteinizing hormone levels in the treatment of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome by in vitro fertilization

It seems, therefore, that in PCOS patients stimulated for IVF with HMG, follicular-phase LH levels have an adverse effect on follicle and oocyte numbers as well as on oocyte quality. Moreover, an inappropriately raised LH appears to have a deleterious effect on the pregnancy outcome by being associated with a greater possibility for miscarriage. On the other hand, the administration of GnRH-a in the long desensitization protocol seems to reverse the detrimental effect of increased LH concentrations on follicular and oocyte development, whereas the beneficial effect on oocyte maturity, although significant, appears to be less profound. Furthermore, GnRH-a administration is associated with a decreased risk for early abortion.

The significance of an early (premature) rise of plasma progesterone in in vitro fertilization cycles induced by a "long protocol" of gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue and human menopausal gonadotropins

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess and clarify the mechanism of whether an early progesterone rise in cycles with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is associated with an impairment of IVF outcome.

METHODS

Seven hundred eighty-six cycles were induced with GnRH-a and human menopausal gonodotropin (hMG) ("long protocol"). Plasma progesterone (PP) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration were divided into three groups: < 0.9 ng/ml (Group A), 1-2 ng/ml (Group B), and > 2 ng/ml (Group C). We also analyzed the pregnancies achieved in our egg donation protocol in relation to the PP levels of each donor on the day of hCG administration.

RESULTS

Group A involved 525 cycles, Group B had 223, and Group C had 38. The overall pregnancy rate per egg transfer was 19.2%, with the highest for Group A (22.3%), declining for Groups B (14.3%) and C (7.9%) (A = B = C; P < 0.005). The embryo implantation rate was found to be negatively correlated with the PP levels on the day of hCG administration. In contrast, there was an opposite trend between PP levels and the chance of conception in 30 pregnancies achieved by egg donation.

CONCLUSION

Since premature luteinization is very unlikely to occur under the conditions of this study, our findings suggest that an early PP rise has a negative impact on endometrial receptivity but not on egg and embryo quality.

Polycystic ovary syndrome: pathophysiology and outcome with in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of IVP-ET in infertile women with the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to provide a comprehensive review of contemporary therapeutic options and their complications as reflected in the current literature.

DESIGN

Pertinent studies in medical literature identified through computerized bibliographic search and via manual review of relevant scientific publications.

RESULTS

In vitro fertilization and ET is an effective therapy for PCOS patients who are refractory to ovulation induction in vivo or who have coexisting infertility factors. The use of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) is associated with significant reductions in the incidence of pregnancy loss and may improve fertilization and cleavage rates. In the PCOS patient, the use of purified FSH preparations does not appear to improve pregnancy rates nor other clinical parameters when compared with hMG. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an important consideration when PCOS patients undergo superovulation protocols. Strategies for OHSS prevention include the use of intravenous albumin immediately after oocyte retrieval, triggering of ovulation with a GnRH-a, or withholding menotropin therapy for several days before hCG administration. Cryopreservation of all embryos for future transfer in an artificial cycle has also proven to be an effective alternative in PCOS patients at high risk for severe OHSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy rates for PCOS patients undergoing IVF-ET are comparable with those for women with tubal factor infertility. Therefore, IVF-ET should be offered to patients with PCOS who are refractory to conventional infertility modalities.

Subfertility in the era of assisted reproduction: changes and consequences

OBJECTIVE

To review the major changes that have occurred during the last decade of assisted reproduction technology (ART) practice, looking at the various conditions that cause subfertility.

DESIGN

A short review describing the progress that has been made during the last decade of ART practice, analyzing the various conditions that cause subfertility, is presented. The efficacy of ART as a treatment of these conditions is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Assisted reproductive technology currently is used for a wide range of indications and has become an acceptable tool in the treatment of subfertile couples. Yet, there is an ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of ART versus conventional treatment for the various conditions that cause subfertility. The effectiveness of IVF in terms of pregnancy rate (PR) was demonstrated only for patients with severe bilateral tubal disease and male subfertility. For couples with other causes of infertility the differences in PRs do not reach statistical significance, and the efficacy of IVF has not been demonstrated clearly to date. Moreover, much of the discussion about management of subfertility has centered on costs of ART and the cost-benefit of ART versus conventional therapy for subfertility. It has been shown that, in women with unexplained infertility, menotropin treatment is as successful, less expensive, and carries a smaller risk than the surgical approach used in ART. However, the exact role of ART in the management of polycystic ovarian syndrome, immunological infertility, and endometriosis still is to be determined. Yet, as embryo implantation after ART still is considerably lower than that of fertile couples who conceive naturally, we expect that the next major thrust improving the effectiveness of ART will occur after future elucidation of factors influencing embryonic implantation.

Reproductive health and polycystic ovary syndrome

Women with hyperandrogenic disorders represent a unique group among those with infertility due to anovulation. Although antiestrogens are effective in restoring ovulation in most women, it remains unclear whether these treatments restore fecundability per ovulatory cycle and the ability to maintain pregnancy in these individuals. Moreover, antiestrogens are ineffective in restoring ovulation in some hyperandrogenic anovulatory women, whose condition poses unique and vexing challenges for the infertility therapist. Gonadotropin treatment in antiestrogen-resistant women often leads to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which has been addressed by modification of dosing schedules (e.g., low-dose administration), pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs, and elimination of luteinizing hormone from the administered gonadotropins. Surgical reduction in ovarian volume has met with some success, although there may be a risk of inducing surgical adhesions of the adnexa. The second major reproductive adversity facing these patients is their elevated risk of endometrial cancer. Unopposed estrogen exposure probably contributes to this risk, but hyperandrogenicity and hyperinsulinism may act independently or in concert with estrogen to amplify the risk in these women. While the risks and strategies for preventive care in these women need to be better defined, reproductive health specialists are urged to continue using presently accepted measures, including education, to maintain these women's reproductive health.