After superovulation-intrauterine insemination fails: the prognosis for treatment by gamete intrafallopian transfer/pronuclear stage transfer

Double versus single homologous intrauterine insemination for male factor infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Male factor infertility affects 30%-50% of infertile couples worldwide, and there is an increasing interest in the optimal management of these patients. In studies comparing double and single intrauterine insemination (IUI), a trend towards higher pregnancy rates in couples with male factor infertility was observed. Therefore, we set out to perform a meta-analysis to examine the superiority of double versus single IUI with the male partner's sperm in couples with male factor infertility. An odds ratio (OR) of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated for the pregnancy rate. Outcomes were analysed by using the Mantel-Haesel or DerSimonian-Laird model according to the heterogeneity of the results. Overall, five trials involving 1125 IUI cycles were included in the meta-analysis. There was a two-fold increase in pregnancies after a cycle with a double IUI compared with a cycle with a single IUI (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.07-3.75; P<0.03). Nevertheless, this result was mainly attributed to the presence of a large trial that weighted as almost 50% in the overall analysis. Sensitivity analysis, excluding this large trial, revealed only a trend towards higher pregnancy rates among double IUI cycles (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.59-4.21), but without statistical significance (P=0.20). Our systematic review highlights that the available evidence regarding the use of double IUI in couples with male factor infertility is fragmentary and weak. Although there may be a trend towards higher pregnancy rates when the number of IUIs per cycle is increased, further large and well-designed randomized trials are needed to provide solid evidence to guide current clinical practice.

Ovulation induction with gonadotropins as sole treatment in infertile couples with open tubes: a randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and timed vaginal intercourse

OBJECTIVE

To assess if ovulation induction with gonadotropins alone is an appropriate treatment in couples affected by unexplained and mild male factor-related infertility and if the concomitant IUI improves the pregnancy rate (PR).

DESIGN

Prospective and randomized trial.

SETTING

Infertility Centre of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

PATIENTS

Two hundred couples affected by unexplained or mild male factor-related infertility were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups: group A (n = 100), treated with three consecutive cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotropins associated with timed vaginal intercourse; group B (n = 100), treated with three consecutive cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotropins associated with IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The PRs obtained with ovulation induction with gonadotropins associated with IUI were similar to those obtained with ovulation induction with gonadotropins associated with timed vaginal intercourse.

CONCLUSION

Ovulation induction with gonadotropins alone may be as effective as ovulation induction with gonadotropins associated with IUI in couples with unexplained and mild male factor infertility and can represent the initial treatment option for its minimal invasivity and reduced cost and organizational problems.