Failure to fertilize in vitro in couples with male factor infertility: what next?

ICSI diagnostic: a way to prevent total fertilization failure after 4 unsuccessful IUI

Background

The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the relevance of dividing oocytes and using some for traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and others for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as of the first IVF cycle in patients with unexplained infertility who have undergone 4 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles which produced no pregnancies.

Methods

This retrospective study includes patients with unexplained infertility who have failed to become pregnant, after 4 IUI, despite normal semen parameters after sperm capacitation. These women were treated in our assisted fertilization program from 2008 until 2015. We analysed the first cycles of women in whom more than 4 oocyte cumulus complexes (OCC) were retrieved and single embryo transfer was performed.

Results

Dividing oocytes between two fertilization techniques reduce the rate of total fertilization failure during the first IVF cycle. No statistical difference were observed for 2 pronuclei (PN) rate between the two techniques. On the other hand, we observed a significantly lower rate of 3 PN, 1 PN, 0 PN with ICSI in comparison with conventional fertilization.

Conclusions

Splitting the oocytes between classical IVF and ICSI increases the chance of embryo transfer on a first IVF cycle after 4 unsuccessful IUI cycles. This half-and-half policy reduces the risk, for the infertile couple, of facing total failure of fertilization and also can provide useful information for the next attempts.

What to do when ICSI fails

The refinement of gamete micromanipulation techniques has made conception possible for couples with male factor infertility who otherwise would remain childless. Moreover, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has ensured that such refractory cases can now generate offspring as successfully as in couples that merely require in vitro insemination. However, despite the now sterling record of ICSI it does not assure a successful outcome for every patient. This can be due, for instance, to the inability of the spermatozoon to activate the oocyte, and applies obviously in cases where spermatozoa are absent from the ejaculate or testicular biopsy. In the present paper we describe in detail the reasons for such failure and review the options that may help overcome it. In particular, we outline the treatment protocol for the situation in which spermatozoa are unable to induce oocyte activation. Further, we report on the clinical outcome achieved with spermatozoa retrieved from the testis, and in cases of extreme oligozoospermia we also explore the option of replicating a single spermatozoon while gaining information on its genomic content. For the most extreme situation in which men have no identifiable germ cells, we will discuss the current status of efforts to accomplish neo-gametogenesis through embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the quality of embryos derived from sibling oocytes by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a less than 40% fertilization rate in a previous standard IVF cycle or with relative male factor infertility were recruited for the study. The oocytes retrieved from each patient were divided into two groups for either conventional insemination (group A) or ICSI (group B). Power analysis showed that to detect a 25% difference in the rate of high-quality embryos between the groups with a power of 0.8, at least 1,200 oocytes were needed in each group.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the study. Group A was comprised of 1,526 oocytes and group B of 1,480 sibling oocytes. As expected, the fertilization rate was significantly higher in group B than group A (67.1 vs. 43.6%, p < 0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in cleavage rate (92.7 and 89.7%, respectively) and the rate of either grade A embryos (22.6 and 23.9%, respectively) or grade A(1) embryos (37.3 and 33.5%, respectively). However, in the subgroup of patients with relative male-factor infertility (n = 36), the rate of grade A(1) embryos was significantly higher in the IVF than the ICSI group (46.4 vs. 29.0%, respectively, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Embryo quality does not seem to be influenced by the mode of fertilization (IVF or ICSI). We assume that embryo quality depends on intrinsic factors of the gametes involved rather than on the fertilization process per se.

Controlled comparison of conventional in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with asthenozoospermia

A controlled comparison between conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been carried out for patients with </=5% rapid progressive (type A) spermatozoa in their fresh semen. Twenty couples were allocated to the study. All semen samples fulfilled the minimum criteria to be allocated to the conventional IVF programme. The two pronuclear (2PN) fertilization rate per retrieved cumulus-oocyte complex was significantly higher after ICSI (63.4%) than after conventional IVF (22.9%), with complete fertilization failure after IVF in 10 out of the 20 cycles. Embryo quality was similar for both treatments. Sixteen patients received only ICSI embryos, two patients only IVF embryos and two patients received IVF and ICSI embryos. The ongoing clinical pregnancy rate was 45%, the implantation rate was 37%. Comparison of the characteristics of patients/cycles with and without 2PN fertilization revealed a higher proportion of progressively motile spermatozoa in the prepared sperm fraction for the group of patients with fertilization after conventional IVF. It can be concluded from this study that absence of or an extremely low proportion of rapid progressive motility in fresh semen indicates a high risk of complete fertilization failure with conventional IVF.

Treatment policy after poor fertilization in the first IVF cycle

PURPOSE

The chance of recurrence of poor fertilization in a second in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle was assessed.

METHODS

Total fertilization failure was defined, and the relationship between the fertilization rate and the number of motile sperm cells per milliliter of semen was assessed. Patients with a total fertilization failure or poor fertilization (20% or less of the oocytes fertilized) were divided into three subgroups with different chances of fertilization and were followed in a subsequent IVF cycle.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate of total fertilization failure was high in all three groups (45-70%), and poor fertilization frequently occurred in the second cycle (50-75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor fertilization frequently recurs in the second IVF cycle. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be considered after fertilization of 20% or less of oocytes in the first cycle, irrespective of the number of motile sperm cells per milliliter of semen.

Establishing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme for the treatment of male factor infertility in Ireland

This paper chronicles the introduction and initial experiences of Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) as a treatment for severe male factor infertility in Ireland. Following initial development of the technique using a bovine model, therapy was offered clinically from September 1995. Up to March 1996 a total of 60 couples underwent the procedure. Fertilisation and embryo transfers were achieved in 50 of these (83.3 percent). Fourteen (23 percent) became clinically pregnant per cycle commenced, 28 percent per embryo transfer. Despite a drop in the total number of oocytes available, fertilisation rates rose over the 6 months of the study from 22 percent to 54 percent. There were 2 miscarriages (14.2 percent) and the multiple pregnancy rate was 28.5 percent. Eight singletons, 2 twins and 2 triplet sets have been successfully delivered. Provided there is proper patient selection, ICSI should prove a valuable addition to treatment options available to infertile couples in Ireland.

An evaluation of the effect of pentoxifylline on sperm function and treatment outcome of male-factor infertility: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to study the effect of pentoxifylline (PF) on fertilization rates in couples with previous failure of fertilization and male-factor infertility and to determine the predictive value of conventional semen analysis parameters in selecting the couples who would benefit from the elective use of PF in IVF.

DESIGN

This prospective controlled study was conducted in an assisted conception

METHODS

Sixty-nine couples with previous failed IVF cycle, who had a low fertilization rate and/or male-factor infertility, were recruited to the study. Multiple follicular development was induced using the same protocol of human menopausal gonadotropin and gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue in both cycles. The oocytes were inseminated with spermatozoa treated with PF. The fertilization rates in the PF cycle were compared to the reference cycle based on semen analysis parameters and previous fertilization rates.

RESULTS

In couples with male infertility, the fertilization rate improved significantly, from 17 to 50% in PF cycles (P < 0.001). A significant improvement in fertilization rate was also demonstrated in couples with previous poor fertilization, < 30% (P < 0.01), particularly in those with a very low fertilization rate, < 20% (P < 0.001). Although there was an overall improvement in fertilization rates in couples with male-factor infertility, there was no cutoff value in sperm motility that would make a significant difference in the impact of PF on fertilization rates.

CONCLUSION

Couples with poor fertilization rates in vitro benefit with a significant improvement in fertilization by the elective use of PF. The improvement is most significant in couples with previous complete failure of fertilization and poor fertilization rates, < 30%.

In vitro fertilization outcome in the presence of severe male factor infertility

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of standard IVF treatment (nonmicromanipulated) with respect to total motile sperm number recovered by swim-up, particularly for couples with severe male factor infertility defined as total motile sperm number < 0.5 x 10(6).

DESIGN

Retrospective study of patients who underwent successful oocyte retrieval in an IVF program from August 10, 1992 to December 31, 1993.

SETTING

A university-based tertiary referral center (The Toronto Hospital).

PATIENTS

All cycles (n = 672) were divided into four groups according to total motile sperm number recovered using standard swim-up: group 1, total motile sperm number < or = 0.50 x 10(6); group 2, total motile sperm number between 0.51 and 1.00 x 10(6); group 3, total motile sperm number between 1.01 and 1.50 x 10(6); and group 4, total motile sperm number > or = 1.51 x 10(6). All patients received the same controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol, which consisted of a GnRH analog flare-up followed by parenteral menotropins. Clinical and cycle characteristics in the four groups were analyzed and outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in clinical and cycle characteristics between the groups. The uniformity of the groups justified analysis of their outcome. A fertilization rate of 21.5% was achieved in couples with severe male factor (group 1). Fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred increased directly with the total motile sperm number. There was no significant difference in implantation rate per embryo between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results in couples with severe male factor infertility compare favorably with monospermic fertilization rates reported in the literature using partial zona dissection and subzonal insertion but is lower than with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Therefore, we believe that couples with severe male factor infertility should be considered for standard IVF, as long as adequate total motile sperm can be recovered (100 x 10(3) per dish). If intracytoplasmic sperm injection is available, it should be offered to these couples.

Complete failure of fertilization in couples with mechanical infertility: implications for subsequent in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether complete failure of fertilization of oocytes in couples with mechanical infertility during the first IVF cycle indicates a poor prognosis for subsequent IVF cycles.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of 172 cycles of IVF in 50 couples with mechanical infertility and complete failure of fertilization during their first IVF trial.

SETTING

In vitro fertilization unit of the Sheba Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Fifty couples undergoing one to eight cycles of IVF for mechanical infertility.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fertilization rate of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

Of the initial 50 couples, 44 underwent additional IVF cycles, and 43 (97.7%) achieved fertilization during the second or third cycle. Twenty-four patients conceived during the study period as a result of IVF.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete failure of fertilization in couples with mechanical infertility does not necessarily persist during subsequent IVF cycles. Therefore, at least two more IVF cycles should be attempted before reverting to other therapeutic options. Complete failure of fertilization during the first cycle of IVF in couples with mechanical infertility is accompanied by a good prognosis for subsequent cycles.

Complete failure of fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: implications for subsequent in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether complete failure of fertilization of oocytes in couples with unexplained infertility persists during subsequent in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of 120 cycles of IVF in 44 couples with unexplained infertility and complete failure of fertilization during their first IVF trial.

SETTING

In vitro fertilization unit of the Sheba Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Forty-four couples undergoing IVF for unexplained infertility.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fertilization rate of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

Of the initial 44 couples, 37 underwent additional IVF cycles and 30 (81.1%) achieved fertilization. Seven patients conceived during the study period as a result of IVF and two conceived spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete failure of fertilization does not necessarily persist during subsequent IVF cycles. Therefore, at least two more IVF cycles should be attempted before reverting to other therapeutic options. However, although fertilization can be achieved in most couples, the mean oocyte fertilization rate during subsequent cycles in this group is low. This suggests an underlying undiagnosed pathology of oocyte/sperm interaction in some of these patients.