Subzonal insemination: a prospective randomized study in patients with abnormal sperm morphology

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of male subfertility

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in couples with male factor subfertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of results obtained after ICSI in the unit of in vitro fertilisation in a private centre for infertility.

RESULTS

Application of ICSI in treatment cycles for male subfertility resulted in a fertilisation rate of 62%. An embryo transfer was done in 98% of the cycles, resulting in a 24% pregnancy rate/ET or 22% per cycle.

CONCLUSION

ICSI is the first microfertilisation technique with reproducible high fertilisation rates in different centres and the method of choice in the treatment of severely impaired sperm quality. Although, up to now, no higher incidence of congenital malformations has been reported, except for sex chromosomal anomalies, careful genetic counselling is mandatory because of the risk of transmitting genetically defined male subfertility to the next generation.

Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of a modified form of Kruger's strict criteria for sperm morphology for pregnancy outcomes after intrauterine insemination (IUI) and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in the presence of normal sperm concentration and motility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 42 couples undergoing COH/IUI was stratified by favorable or unfavorable sperm morphology. End points were pregnancy or failure of treatment as defined by four or more cycles of COH/ IUI without pregnancy.

RESULTS

An unfavorable morphology (< 4%) was highly predictive of failure during COH-IUI (94.45%; 17/18). A normal PIF was a sensitive indicator of those patients who became pregnant (93.8%; 15/16) and had a fair specificity for failure to achieve pregnancy after four cycles of treatment (65.4%; 17/26). Couples with a favorable sperm morphology were 28.3 times as likely to achieve a pregnancy within four cycles of treatment as those with unfavorable sperm morphology [95% confidence limits, 3.2 to 250.5; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal strict morphologic assessment is both sensitive and specific for pregnancy outcomes in couples undergoing COH/IUI. Couples with persistently unfavorable sperm morphology should be counseled appropriately and would be better served by more aggressive treatment with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

The effective cumulative pregnancy rate of different modes of treatment of male infertility

The clinical efficacy of conventional and advanced methods of treatment was assessed in 814 couples with infertility due to a male factor. The monthly and effective cumulative rate of ongoing or term pregnancies was calculated during 4712 couple-months. Treatment of varicocele by transcatheter embolization, resulting in 3.9% pregnancies per cycle and an effective cumulative pregnancy rate of 41% after 1 year, is more effective than counselling and timed intercourse (9% pregnancies after 12 months). Intrauterine insemination (IUI) of washed spermatozoa produced 17% pregnancies in the initial 4 months, but the success rate of the subsequent cycles (1.7% per cycle) was not different from that of the controls. In vitro fertilization (IVF) resulted in 16% pregnancies per attempt, but the effective cumulative pregnancy rate was only 31% in 12 months due to the long interval between treatment attempts and the high drop-out rate. With subzonal microinjection of sperm, the fertilization rate was higher (71%) than with regular IVF (29%) but both the pregnancy rate per attempt (9%) and the effective cumulative pregnancy rate (17% after 12 months) were low. The 10th percentile of sperm characteristics (cut-off values) of successful cases showed intrauterine insemination to be advantageous in cases with a lower percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility (9%) than in the controls (15%). The cut-off value of sperm morphology in IVF (4%) is lower than that of IUI (8%) and of the controls (9%), but higher than that of subzonal insemination (1%). Treatment strategy must be defined selecting or combining conventional and assisted reproductive technology for each individual couple with male factor infertility.

Human sperm chromosome analysis after microinjection into hamster oocytes

PURPOSE

Subzonal sperm insemination (SUZI) into hamster oocytes was performed to establish the karyotypes of the fertilizing spermatozoa.

METHODS

Spermatozoa from two males with normal semen parameters were microinjected. Of 72 (52 + 20) analyzed sperm chromosome metaphases, only 1 (1.4%) was considered abnormal, showing a structural abnormality.

RESULTS

No hyperhaploidy was observed. Rates of sperm chromosomal abnormalities after microinjection were not higher than those reported previously using zona-free egg insemination, suggesting that the SUZI procedure per se does not increase sperm chromosomal abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of subzonal insemination into hamster oocytes for the study of human sperm chromosomes in males with low sperm counts is discussed.

Correlation between sperm morphology using strict criteria in original semen and swim-up inseminate and human in vitro fertilization

To study the value of sperm morphology using strict criteria in raw semen and in swim-up inseminate of human in vitro fertilization (IVF), 135 cycles of IVF with normal sperm concentration and motility were recruited. At least two mature oocytes were recovered in each cycle. The correlation between the percentages of normal forms and fertilization rates of mature oocytes was analyzed. The results demonstrate that the percentage of normal forms in both the raw semen and swim-up sample of patients with poor fertilization was significantly lower than in those with acceptable fertilization. The percentages of normal forms both in raw semen and in swim-up sample were significantly correlated with fertilization rates in vitro, however, the former seemed to have a better correlation (r = .51 and .19, respectively). Regarding the percentages of normal forms in raw semen, the fertilization rate in patients with normal forms < 4% was 6 +/- 11%, for 4-14% it was 58 +/- 36%, and for > 14% it was 88 +/- 20%. The fertilization rates were significantly different among these three groups of patients. The evaluation of sperm morphology using strict criteria in raw semen before IVF is predictive of fertilization outcome and may also help doctors to choose an optimal method of treatment for patients.

Gamete microsurgery for assisted fertilization

Several methods of gamete microsurgery have been proposed to facilitate the union of the spermatozoon and oocyte in infertile couples. Partial zona dissection, subzonal sperm insertion, and intracytoplasmic sperm insertion are the three techniques currently being used for assisted fertilization in human in vitro fertilization laboratories. Fertilization and pregnancy rates after partial zona dissection and subzonal insertion have been variable and rather low. Recent reports of relatively high fertilization and pregnancy rates achieved after intracytoplasmic sperm insertion have rejuvenated interest in gamete microsurgery. Methods for each procedure are described. Studies which have attempted patient selection for gamete microsurgery are discussed.

Subzonal insemination (SUZI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) in microdroplets for the treatment of male-factor infertility

PURPOSE

The results of subzonal insemination (SUZI) and in vitro fertilization with microdroplet insemination used in couples with male-factor infertility are presented.

RESULTS

The total fertilization rate was 17.4% for SUZI (n = 89) and 49.3% for microdroplet IVF (n = 100). The fertilization rate for standard IVF (n = 510), not including any male-factor infertility and performed during the same period, was 73.2%. The "take-home baby rate" per started cycle and per embryo transfer (ET), respectively, was 10 and 17.6% for SUZI and 20 and 24.7% for microdrop IVF. For standard IVF these figures were 27 and 31.7%.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that microdroplet IVF can be used with good results in cases of moderate male-factor infertility. The normal (2PN) fertilization rate with the SUZI technique was only 15.1%. However, despite the low fertilization rate, SUZI should be considered when dealing with severe male-factor infertility.