Intravenous albumin does not prevent the development of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Volume expanders for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially fatal complication of ovarian stimulation which affects 1% to 14% of all in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A number of clinical studies with conflicting results have reported on the use of plasma expanders such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch (HES), mannitol, polygeline and dextran as a possible intervention for the prevention of OHSS. Women with very high estradiol levels, high numbers of follicles or oocytes retrieved, and women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), are at particularly high risk of developing OHSS. Plasma expanders are not commonly used nowadays in ovarian hyperstimulation. This is mainly because clinical evidence on their effectiveness remains sparse, because of the low incidence of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the simultaneous introduction of mild stimulation approaches, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols and the freeze-all strategy for the prevention of OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness and safety of administration of volume expanders for the prevention of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched databases including the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and trial registers to September 2015; no date restrictions were used as new comparators were included in this search. The references of relevant publications were also searched. We attempted to contact authors to provide or clarify data that were unclear from trial or abstract reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing volume expanders versus placebo or no treatment for the prevention of OHSS in high-risk women undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation as part of any assisted reproductive technique.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted relevant data. The primary review outcome was moderate or severe OHSS. Other outcomes were live birth, pregnancy and adverse events. We combined data to calculate pooled Peto odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each intervention. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for each comparison, using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs (1867 women) comparing human albumin (seven RCTs) or HES (two RCTs) or mannitol (one RCT) versus placebo or no treatment for prevention of OHSS. The evidence was very low to moderate quality for all comparisons. The main limitations were imprecision, poor reporting of study methods, and failure to blind outcome assessment.There was evidence of a beneficial effect of intravenous albumin on OHSS, though heterogeneity was substantial (Peto OR 0.67 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95, seven studies, 1452 high risk women; I² = 69%, very low quality evidence) . This suggests that if the rate of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 12%, it will be about 9% (6% to12%) with the use of intravenous albumin. However, there was evidence of a detrimental effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 0.72 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94, I² = 42%, seven studies 1069 high risk women, moderate quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of pregnancy is 40% without treatment, it will be about 32% (27% to 38%) with the use of albumin.There was evidence of a beneficial effect of HES on OHSS (Peto OR 0.27 95% CI 0.12 to 0.59, I² = 0%, two studies, 272 women, very low quality evidence). This suggests that if the rate of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 16%, it will be about 5% (2% to 10%) with the use of HES. There was no evidence of an effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 1.20 95% CI 0.49 to 2.93, one study, 168 women, very low quality evidence).There was evidence of a beneficial effect of mannitol on OHSS (Peto OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64, one study, 226 women with PCOS, low quality evidence). This means that if the risk of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 52%, it will be about 29% (19% to 41%) with mannitol. There was no evidence of an effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 0.85 95% CI 0.47 to 1.55; one study, 226 women, low quality evidence).Live birth rates were not reported in any of the studies. Adverse events appeared to be uncommon, but were too poorly reported to reach any firm conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that the plasma expanders assessed in this review (human albumin, HES and mannitol) reduce rates of moderate and severe OHSS in women at high risk. Adverse events appear to be uncommon, but were too poorly reported to reach any firm conclusions, and there were no data on live birth. However, there was evidence that human albumin reduces pregnancy rates. While there was no evidence that HES, or mannitol had any influence on pregnancy rates, the evidence of effectiveness was based on very few trials which need to be confirmed in additional, larger randomised controlled trials (RCTs) before they should be considered for routine use in clinical practice.

Update on management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a relatively common complication of ovarian stimulation and can be life threatening. The pathophysiology of OHSS is characterized by increased capillary permeability, leading to leakage of fluid from the vascular compartment, with third-space fluid accumulation and intravascular dehydration. The increased intra-abdominal pressure indicated that OHSS may be considered a compartment syndrome. Vascular endothelial growth factor, also known as vascular permeability factor, has emerged as one of the mediators intrinsic to the development of OHSS. Conventional management is focused on supportive care until the spontaneous resolution of the condition. The standard of care for treatment-monitoring of appropriate clinical parameters, fluid balance management, thrombosis prophylaxis, and ascites treatment-should prevent severe morbidity in most cases. This review will cover inpatient and outpatient management. The potential therapeutic approach targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system will be discussed.

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and treatment]

The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a major complication of ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization, with severe morbidity and possible mortality. Whereas its pathophysiology remains ill-established, the VEGF may play a key role as well as coagulation disturbances. Risk factors for severe OHSS may be related to patients characteristics or to the management of the ovarian stimulation. Two types of OHSS are usually distinguished: the early OHSS, immediately following the ovulation triggering and a later and more severe one, occurring in case of pregnancy. As no etiologic treatment is available, the therapeutic management of OHSS should focus on its related-complications. Thrombotic complications that can occur in venous or arterial vessels represent the major risk of OHSS, possibly conducting to myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents. Once the OHSS is diagnosed, prevention of thrombotic accidents remains the major issue.

Intra-venous fluids for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially fatal complication of ovarian stimulation, which affects 1% to 14% of all in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A number of clinical studies with conflicting results have reported on the use of intravenous fluids such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch, Haemaccel® and dextran as a possible way for preventing the severe form of OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness and safety of administration of intravenous fluids such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch, Haemaccel® and dextran in the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, to third quarter 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2010), EMBASE (1980 to November 2010) and The National Research Register (to November 2010). The citation lists of relevant publications, review articles, abstracts of scientific meetings and included studies were also searched. The authors were contacted to provide or clarify data that were unclear from the trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effects of intravenous fluids with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of severe OHSS in high risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently scanned the abstracts, identified relevant papers, assessed inclusion of trials and trial quality and extracted relevant data. Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, allocation concealment and outcomes. Where possible, data were pooled for analysis. A separate analysis of studies was performed for human albumin and hydroxyethyl starch versus placebo or no treatment. Other potential intravenous fluids have been identified, such as Haemaccel and dextran, however no randomised controlled studies on their applicability could be found.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs involving 1660 (human albumin vs placebo) and 487 (HES vs placebo) randomised women, have been included in this review. There was a borderline statistically significant decrease in the incidence of severe OHSS with administration of human albumin (8 RCTs, OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99).There was a statistically significant decrease in severe OHSS incidence with administration of hydroxyethyl starch (3 RCTs, OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.40). There was no evidence of statistical difference in the pregnancy rate between both groups of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence of benefit from intra-venous albumin administration at the time of oocyte retrieval in the prevention or reduction of the incidence of severe OHSS in high risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles. Hydroxyethyl starch markedly decreases the incidence of severe OHSS.

Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic potentially life threatening condition resulting from an excessive ovarian stimulation. Its reported incidence varies from one percent to ten percent of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The factors leading to this syndrome have not been completely explained. It seems likely that the release of vasoactive substances, secreted by the ovaries under human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation plays a key role in triggering this syndrome. The hallmark of this condition, is a massive shift of fluid from the intra-vascular compartment to the third space resulting in profound intra-vascular depletion and haemoconcentration.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate (i) the effectiveness of cryopreservation (embryo freezing) for the prevention of OHSS when compared with human intra-venous albumin infusion (ii) the effectiveness of the elective cryopreservation (embryo freezing ) of all embryos for the prevention of OHSS when compared with fresh embryo transfer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials up to April 2007. In addition, MEDLINE (PUBMED 1985 to March 2007), EMBASE (1985 to April 2007), CINAHL (1985 to March 2007) and the National Research Register (April 2007) were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which either human intra-venous albumin or cryopreservation of all embryos were used as a therapeutic approach to OHSS were included. The women were women of reproductive age who were down regulated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-analogue (GnRH-a), undergoing superovulation in in vitro fertilization and or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF and or ICSI) cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors, Mr N.N. Amso (NNA) and Dr A. D'Angelo (ADA) scanned the titles and the abstracts of the reports identified by electronic searching in order to find relevant papers. One reviewer (ADA) obtained copies of the full text articles and made copies for the other reviewer (NNA) in which details of authors, institution, results and discussion were removed in order to assess their eligibility for inclusion . Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Additional information on the trial methodology or data were requested by writing to the corresponding authors directly. The interventions compared were cryopreservation (embryo freezing) versus intra-venous human albumin administration and elective cryopreservation of all embryos versus fresh embryo transfer. The primary outcomes were: incidence of moderate and severe OHSS versus nil and or mild OHSS, clinical pregnancies and or woman. The secondary outcomes were: number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, number of embryos transferred, number of embryos frozen, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate, number of women admitted to the hospital as inpatient or outpatient and time to the next menstrual period (resolution time). Statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

No new studies were identified for inclusion in the update therefore the of seventeen studies originally identified in the review published issue 2, 2002. It therefore remains that two studies of which met our inclusion criteria one study was included where cryopreservation (embryo freezing) was compared with intra-venous human albumin administration (Shaker 1996) and one study was included where elective cryopreservation of all embryos was compared with fresh embryo transfer (Ferraretti 1999). When cryopreservation was compared with intra-venous human albumin administration no difference was found in all the outcomes examined between the two groups. When elective cryopreservation of all embryos was compared with fresh embryo transfer no difference was found in all the outcomes examined between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated of the review (D'Angelo 2002) has showed that there is insufficient evidence to support routine cryopreservation and insufficient evidence for the relative merits of intra-venous albumin versus cryopreservation.

In vitro maturation of oocytes collected from unstimulated ovaries for oocyte donation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of immature oocyte collection from unstimulated ovaries as a potential source of oocyte donation.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary, university-based, in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENT(S)

Twelve oocyte donors with ultrasound-only polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovary syndrome matched with 12 oocyte recipients.

INTERVENTION(S)

Immature oocyte collection without any ovarian stimulation. In vitro maturation of the oocytes. Embryo transfer of the embryos.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Immature oocyte collection, maturation, fertilization, and cleavage rates. Implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates.

RESULT(S)

A mean of 12.8 +/- 5.1 Germinal-vesicle oocytes were aspirated per collection. The in vitro maturation rate was 68.3% +/- 18.4% with a mean of 8.7 +/- 3.6 mature oocytes per collection. The mean fertilization rate was 73.3% +/- 19.4%. Two to five embryos (median four) were transferred. Six recipients conceived, giving a 50% clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. The mean implantation rate per embryo was 18.2%. The live birth rate per cycle started was 30%.

CONCLUSION(S)

Collecting immature oocytes from unstimulated ovaries for the purpose of oocyte donation is a simple procedure that totally avoids ovarian stimulation. With appropriate selection of women with ultrasound-only polycystic ovaries or women with the polycystic ovary syndrome, the pregnancy rates of the recipients are comparable with those achieved through conventional IVF oocyte donor cycles.

[Coasting and ovarian stimulation protocols in high-responder patients undergoing assisted conception]

Over-responsive patients are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, which may lead to severe complications. The choice of ovarian stimulation protocol or the use of a coasting (gonadotrophins suspension) with its associated risk of too strong ovarian response will be discussed herein. As for in vitro fertilization stimulation protocols, the best are probably those which use steadily increasing low doses of gonadotrophins, associated to GnRH agonists (low-dose protocols) or those which complete a double hypophyseal inhibition (estro-progestative association and GnRH agonists). GnRH antagonists may also reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation, by estradiol drop. Outside the context of in vitro fertilization GnRH continuous administration or low -dose gonadotrophin stimulation are the best options. A coasting will be performed when an excess follicle response is documented. Under strict hormonal follow-up and within four days it allows achieving a high rate of pregnancy with a lower risk of hyperstimulation. Compared to other therapies of hyperstimulation syndrome, the coasting allows to avoid cycle cancellation or freezing of all embryos.

Comparison of coasting and intravenous albumin in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of coasting to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with i.v. albumin and to determine if different timing of gonadotropin coasting would affect the IVF outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital-based IVF program.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred sixty-two women undergoing IVF treatment cycles who were considered to be at high risk for developing OHSS.

INTERVENTION(S)

Gonadotropin administration was withheld in 60 patients: either coasting occurred before follicular maturation (early coasting subset, n = 28) or follicular maturity was attained before coasting (late coasting subset, n = 32). Outcomes were compared in 102 patients at risk for OHSS who received i.v. albumin on the day of oocyte retrieval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Incidence of OHSS and outcome parameters.

RESULT(S)

Although the fertilization rates and the incidence of OHSS did not differ significantly between the coasting and i.v. albumin groups, the mean number of oocytes retrieved, the pregnancy rates, and implantation rates were significantly lower in the coasting group. There is no statistical difference in the entire outcome examined and the incidence of OHSS between the early and late coasting subsets.

CONCLUSION(S)

Coasting is as effective as i.v. albumin in preventing OHSS in high-risk patients but yields inferior pregnancy rates. Early coasting is as successful as late coasting in preventing OHSS with similar IVF outcome.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: strategies for prevention

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious, iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation. The following report is a review of traditional and new strategies to prevent the development of OHSS. Techniques such as reducing the ovarian stimulus, coasting and cryopreservation are discussed. Other more investigative strategies are also summarized, including follicular aspiration, in-vitro maturation of immature oocytes, the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to trigger ovulation and the use of volume expanders such as hydroxyethyl starch. In addition, a review of the internal experience with OHSS at the authors' institution is described. All these preventative approaches are based on current understanding of the physiologic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of OHSS.

Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a Cochrane review

This paper is based on a Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library, issue 3, 2002 (see www.CochraneLibrary.net for information) with permission from The Cochrane Collaboration and Update Software. Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic condition resulting from an excessive ovarian response to superovulation medication. The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of cryopreservation (embryo freezing) when compared with human i.v. albumin infusion and with fresh embryo transfer for the prevention of OHSS.

METHODS

This was based on a Cochrane Review. Randomized controlled trials in which either human i.v. albumin or cryopreservation of all embryos was used as a therapeutic approach to OHSS were included. The participants were women down-regulated by GnRH agonist, undergoing superovulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. The interventions compared were cryopreservation versus i.v. human albumin administration and elective cryopreservation of all embryos versus fresh embryo transfer. The primary outcomes were: incidence of moderate and severe OHSS versus nil/mild OHSS, and clinical pregnancies/woman. Statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group guidelines.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified, two of which met our inclusion criteria. One study was included where cryopreservation was compared with i.v. human albumin administration and another where elective cryopreservation of all embryos was compared with fresh embryo transfer. In both interventions no difference was found in all the outcomes examined between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This review has shown that there is insufficient evidence to support routine cryopreservation and insufficient evidence for the relative merits of i.v. albumin versus cryopreservation.

Aggressive outpatient treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with ascites using transvaginal culdocentesis and intravenous albumin minimizes hospitalization

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of outpatient treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome associated with ascites.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients diagnosed with ovarian hyperstimulation and ascites from 2,246 consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles were retrospectively studied. Patients were treated with outpatient transvaginal culdocentesis and rehydration with intravenous crystalloids and albumin every 1-3 days until resolution of symptoms or hospitalization was required. Outcomes measured included incidences of hospitalization, pregnancy outcomes, cycle characteristics, and oocyte donors versus nondonors comparisons.

RESULTS

No complications occurred from outpatient treatments, and 91.6% of patients avoided hospitalization. The pregnancy rate in patients undergoing transfer was 84.7%, and the spontaneous loss rate was 16%. Overall, the estradiol on day of hCG was 4331 pg/mL (range 2,211-8,167), ascites removed was 1910 cm3 (122-4,000), and number of outpatient treatments was 3.4 (1-14). Nondonors averaged more outpatient treatments than donors (3.97 vs. 1.85), but similar rates of hospitalization (3/35 vs. 1/13).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment consisting of culdocentesis, intravenous rehydration, and albumin minimized the need for hospitalization in hyperstimulated patients.

Embryo freezing for preventing Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic potentially life threatening condition resulting from an excessive ovarian stimulation. Its reported incidence varies from 1% to 10% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The factors leading to this syndrome have not been completely explained. It seems likely that the release of vasoactive substances, secreted by the ovaries under human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation plays a key role in triggering this syndrome. The hallmark of this condition, is a massive shift of fluid from the intra-vascular compartment to the third space resulting in profound intra-vascular depletion and hemoconcentration.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate (i) the effectiveness of cryopreservation (embryo freezing) for the prevention of OHSS when compared with human intra-venous albumin infusion and (ii) the effectiveness of the elective cryopreservation (embryo freezing ) of all embryos for the prevention of OHSS when compared with fresh embryo transfer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Publications in the literature that describe or may describe randomised controlled trials of both human intra-venous albumin and freezing of all embryos in the management of OHSS as consequence of the superovulation in assisted reproduction techniques (ART) cycles were searched. The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials was searched. In addition, MEDLINE (PUBMED 1985 to 2001), EMBASE (1985 to 2001), CINHAL (1985 to 2001) and the National Research Register were searched

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which either human intra-venous albumin or cryopreservation of all embryos were used as a therapeutic approach to OHSS were included. The participants were women of reproductive age who were down regulated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-analogue (GnRH-a), undergoing superovulation in in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers, Mr N.N. Amso (NNA) and Dr A. D'Angelo (ADA) scanned the titles and the abstracts of the reports identified by electronic searching in order to find relevant papers. One reviewer (ADA) obtained copies of the full text articles and made copies for the other reviewer (NNA) in which details of authors, institution, results and discussion were removed in order to assess their eligibility for inclusion. Then, both reviewers extracted data independently using forms designed according to Cochrane guidelines. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Additional information on the trial methodology or data were requested by writing to the corresponding authors directly. The interventions compared were cryopreservation (embryo freezing) versus intra-venous human albumin administration and elective cryopreservation of all embryos versus fresh embryo transfer. The primary outcomes were: incidence of moderate and severe OHSS versus nil/mild OHSS, clinical pregnancies/woman. The secondary outcomes were: number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, number of embryos transferred, number of embryos frozen, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate, number of women admitted to the hospital as inpatient or outpatient and time to the next menstrual period (resolution time). Statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified, two of which met our inclusion criteria. One study was included where cryopreservation (embryo freezing) was compared with intra-venous human albumin administration (Shaker 1996) and one study was included where elective cryopreservation of all embryos was compared with fresh embryo transfer (Ferraretti 1999). When cryopreservation was compared with intra-venous human albumin administration no difference was found in all the outcomes examined between the two groups. When elective cryopreservation of all embryos was compared with fresh embryo transfer no difference was found in all the outcomes examined between the two groups.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review has showed that there is insufficient evidence to support routine cryopreservation and insufficient evidence for the relative merits of intra-venous albumin versus cryopreservation.

Intra-venous albumin for preventing severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic condition that occurs after the administration of human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) with or without gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. OHSS is a threat to every woman undergoing ovulation induction and is potentially lethal in its severest form. Severe OHSS is characterised by growth of multiple large follicles with massive extravascular protein rich fluid shift. This may lead to hypovolaemia, haemoconcentration, oliguria, and electrolyte disturbance. Human albumin solutions are now used in the management of shock and other conditions in which restoration of blood volume is urgent, the acute management of burns, and clinical situations associated with hypoproteinaemia. Recently, a number of clinical trials with conflicting results have been reported in which albumin has been tested as a possible way for preventing the severe form of OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness of human albumin administration in prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group literature search strategy was used to identify randomised trials that had compared the use of human albumin with placebo or no treatment in the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. A diverse search strategy was employed, including handsearching of core journals from 1966 to November 2001, searching bibliographies of relevant trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychLIT and CINAHL databases, the MDSG specialised register, abstracts from North American and European meetings and contact with authors of relevant papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they compared the effect of human albumin with placebo or no treatment on relevant outcomes. Only randomised controlled studies were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Seven randomised controlled trials were identified, five of which met our inclusion criteria and enrolled 378 women (193 in the albumin treated group and 185 in the control group). Trials under consideration were evaluated for methodological quality and appropriateness for inclusion without consideration of their results.The five included trials were single-centre parallel randomised controlled studies. Relevant data were extracted independently by two reviewers using the standardized data extraction sheet. Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, completeness of follow-up, presence or absence of crossover and co-intervention.

DATA SYNTHESIS

2x2 tables were generated for all relevant outcomes. Odds ratios were calculated using the Peto modified Mantel-Haenszel technique.

MAIN RESULTS

Meta-analysis of the five included trials demonstrated significant reduction in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome on administration of human albumin (odds ratio was 0.28 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.73). Relative risk was 0.35 (0.14 - 0.87) and absolute risk reduction was 5.5. For every 18 women at risk of severe OHSS, albumin infusion will save one more case. There was no evidence of an increase in the pregnancy rate (odds ratio was 1.09, (95% CI 0.65 to 1.83) REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This review shows a clear benefit from administration of intra-venous albumin at the time of oocyte retrieval in prevention of severe OHSS in high-risk cases. Whether the NNT would justify the routine use of albumin infusion in cases at risk of severe OHSS needs to be judged by clinical decision makers.

The questionable use of albumin for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in an IVF programme: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of intravenous (IV) albumin administration in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and in the improvement of IVF conception outcomes was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double blind study.

METHODS

Ninety-eight women were enrolled in the study and were consecutively assigned to either a treatment group or a control group. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up after assignment. Of the remaining 87 women, 46 received albumin on the day of oocyte retrieval, and 41 received 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a placebo control. Outcome measures included OHSS incidence rates and pregnancy rates in the two trial groups.

RESULTS

Four of the 46 patients in the study group developed severe OHSS and six developed moderate OHSS. In the control group, one of the 41 developed severe OHSS and five developed moderate OHSS. The difference in OHSS incidence rates between the two groups was not statistically significant [relative risk (RR) = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.59-3.73]. Fourteen patients (30%) in the intervention group conceived, compared with 16 patients (39%) in the control group. The difference in conception rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.44-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Albumin appears to have no positive effect on OHSS or conception rates, while its use carries the risk of undesirable side effects, including exacerbation of ascites in OHSS, nausea, vomiting, febrile reaction, allergic reaction, anaphylactic shock and risk of virus and prion transmission. We suggest that this form of treatment should not be included in the prevention of OHSS.

Intravenous albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized placebo controlled study

A prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial was carried out on 250 patients (cycles) considered at risk of developing OHSS in an IVF programme. Criteria for inclusion were: estradiol value of more than 3000 pg/ml or the presence of more than 20 follicles on the day of hCG administration. Patients were randomized by using a random table to receive either 20% human albumin 50 ml (n: 82); 6% hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) 500 ml (n: 85) or a placebo of 500 ml 0.9% NaCl solution (n: 83) over 30 min during oocyte collection. Groups were similar with respect to patients' age, estradiol levels on hCG day, body mass index, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred and pregnancies (P>0.05). There was no severe OHSS in patients who received albumin and HES while four patients who received placebo developed severe OHSS. On the other hand moderate OHSS was encountered in four patients in the albumin group; five patients receiving HES; and 12 patients receiving placebo. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate, severe and overall OHSS among groups (P values of <0.05, <0.05, and <0.01, respectively). Both HES and albumin significantly reduced the incidence of moderate, severe and overall incidence of OHSS. It is concluded that hydroxyethyl starch is a cheaper and safer alternative to Human Albumin in OHSS prevention.

Relationships of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor with liver dysfunction in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The aims of this study were to determine if differences in serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and clinical pregnancy rate, could be observed in women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in those who did and did not have liver dysfunction. Twenty-nine in-vitro fertilization patients with severe OHSS were included. The patients were divided into the normal liver function tests (LFT) group (n = 14) and the abnormal LFT group (n = 15) according to the LFT on day of admission. Periodic measurements of serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), VEGF, oestradiol, progesterone concentrations, and LFT were performed during hospitalization. Concentrations of IL-6 in the active phase of OHSS were significantly higher in the abnormal LFT group than in the normal LFT group (19.7 +/- 15.7 versus 8.1 +/- 7.0 pg/ml, respectively). The severity of liver dysfunction was not correlated with concentrations of oestradiol, progesterone, haematocrit, white blood cell counts, or any studied cytokine. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the abnormal LFT group (46.7%) than in the normal LFT group (85.7%). These results suggest that IL-6 cytokine system may play a role in the pathogenesis of liver dysfunction in severe OHSS. Abnormal LFT were associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates.

Prognostic importance of serial cytokine changes in ascites and pleural effusion in women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic value of various cytokine levels in ascites and pleural effusion during the evolution of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

DESIGN

A longitudinal study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty patients with severe OHSS who required either paracentesis or thoracentesis or both from whom ascites (n = 56) or pleural effusion (n = 12) samples were obtained. Control peritoneal fluid was obtained from 20 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Abdominal paracentesis for tense ascites and thoracentesis for massive pleural effusion. Control peritoneal fluid was obtained before oocyte retrieval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Levels of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), E2, and progesterone concentrations in ascites and pleural effusion.

RESULT(S)

Levels of VEGF and IL-6 in ascites dropped significantly during the course of OHSS and were not correlated with E2 concentrations. Levels of VEGF were significantly correlated with levels of IL-1 beta, IL-8, and TNF-alpha, as well as progesterone concentrations, hematocrit, and white blood cell counts. None of the cytokine levels measured in pleural effusion were correlated with the course of OHSS.

CONCLUSION(S)

These results suggest that local cytokines might be involved in the evolution of severe OHSS and possibly serve as prognostic markers for this syndrome.