Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour GI. Controversies in the surgical management of hydrosalpinx.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000;
12:297-301. [PMID:
10954150 DOI:
10.1097/00001703-200008000-00006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The surgical management of hydrosalpinges is a controversial subject. Chronic pathology of the fallopian tube with distal obstruction leads to the formation of a hydrosalpinx, and is associated with very poor pregnancy rates after surgery. In these cases, in-vitro fertilization has proved to be a much better alternative. However, several studies have shown that patients with hydrosalpinges have significantly lower pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization compared with patients with other forms of tubal damage. The exact mechanism by which the hydrosalpinx adversely affects in-vitro fertilization results is not yet fully understood. The value of performing a salpingectomy before in-vitro fertilization has been studied extensively. Currently, a clear benefit in salpingectomies has been proved for patients with ultrasonically visible hydrosalpinges.
Collapse