Comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor sperm: a meta-analysis

Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment

BACKGROUND

The first-line treatment in donor sperm treatment consists of inseminations that can be done by intrauterine insemination (IUI) or by intracervical insemination (ICI).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and intracervical insemination (ICI) in women who start donor sperm treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL in October 2016, checked references of relevant studies, and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, the Grey literature, and five trials registers on 15 December 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on IUI versus ICI in natural cycles or with ovarian stimulation, and RCTs comparing different cointerventions in IUI and ICI. We included cross-over studies if pre-cross-over data were available.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. We collected data on primary outcomes of live birth and multiple pregnancy rates, and on secondary outcomes of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and cancellation rates.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six RCTs (708 women analysed) on ICI and IUI in donor sperm treatment. Two studies compared IUI and ICI in natural cycles, two studies compared IUI and ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles, and two studies compared timing of IUI and ICI. There was very low-quality evidence; the main limitations were risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.IUI versus ICI in natural cyclesThere was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in live birth rate between IUI and ICI in natural cycles (odds ratio (OR) 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 87.13; 1 RCT, 26 women; very low-quality evidence). There was only one live birth in this study (in the IUI group). IUI resulted in higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR 6.18, 95% CI 1.91 to 20.03; 2 RCTs, 76 women; I² = 48%; very low-quality evidence).No multiple pregnancies or miscarriages occurred in this study.IUI versus ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cyclesThere was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in live birth rate between IUI and ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles (OR 2.55, 95% CI 0.72 to 8.96; 1 RCT, 43 women; very low-quality evidence). This suggested that if the chance of a live birth following ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles was assumed to be 30%, the chance following IUI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles would be between 24% and 80%. IUI may result in higher clinical pregnancy rates than ICI (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.78; 2 RCTs, 131 women; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). IUI may be associated with higher multiple pregnancy rates than ICI (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.00 to 7.69; 2 RCTs, 131 women; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). This suggested that if the risk of multiple pregnancy following ICI in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles was assumed to be 10%, the risk following IUI would be between 10% and 46%.We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference between the groups in miscarriage rates in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.04; 2 RCTs, overall 67 pregnancies; I² = 50%; very low-quality evidence).Timing of IUI and ICIWe found no studies that reported on live birth rates.We found a higher clinical pregnancy rate when IUI was timed one day after a rise in blood levels of luteinising hormone (LH) compared to IUI two days after a rise in blood levels of LH (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.53; 1 RCT, 351 women; low-quality evidence). We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any clear difference in clinical pregnancy rates between ICI timed after a rise in urinary levels of LH versus a rise in basal temperature plus cervical mucus scores (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.11; 1 RCT, 56 women; very low-quality evidence).Neither of these studies reported multiple pregnancy or miscarriage rates as outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a clear difference in live birth rates between IUI and ICI in natural or gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles in women who started with donor sperm treatment. There was insufficient evidence available for the effect of timing of IUI or ICI on live birth rates. Very low-quality data suggested that in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles, ICI may be associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate than IUI, but also with a higher risk of multiple pregnancy rate. We concluded that the current evidence was too limited to choose between IUI or ICI, in natural cycles or with ovarian stimulation, in donor sperm treatment.

Frozen-thawed rhesus sperm retain normal morphology and highly progressive motility but exhibit sharply reduced efficiency in penetrating cervical mucus and hyaluronic acid gel

The preservation of the genetic diversity of captive populations of rhesus monkeys is critical to the future of biomedical research. Cryopreservation of rhesus macaque sperm is relatively simple to perform, yields high post-thaw motility, and theoretically, provides via artificial insemination (AI) a way to easily transfer genetics among colonies of animals. In the interest of optimizing semen cryopreservation methods for use with vaginal AI, we evaluated the ability of frozen-thawed rhesus sperm to penetrate periovulatory cervical mucus (CM). Motile sperm concentration of pre-freeze ("fresh") and post-thawed ("thawed") samples from five different males were normalized for both computer assisted sperm motion analysis and CM penetration experiments. Sperm samples were deposited into slide chambers containing CM or gel composed of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a surrogate for CM and numbers of sperm were recorded as they entered a video field a preset distance from the sperm suspension-CM (or HA) interface. Fresh and thawed sperm were dried on glass slides, "Pap"-stained, and assessed for changes in head dimensions and head and flagellar shape. While retaining better than 80% of fresh sperm progressive motility, thawed sperm from the same ejaculate retained on average only 18.6% of the CM penetration ability. Experiments using HA gel yielded similar results only with reduced experimental error and thus improved detection of treatment differences. Neither the percentage of abnormal forms nor head dimensions differed between fresh and thawed sperm. While findings suggests that sperm-CM interaction is a prominent factor in previous failures of vaginal AI with cryopreserved macaque sperm, neither sperm motility nor morphology appears to account for changes in the ability of cryopreserved sperm to penetrate CM. Our data points to a previously unidentified manifestation of cryodamage which may have implications for assessment of sperm function beyond the cervix and across mammalian species.

Coste de las técnicas de reproducción asistida en un hospital público

OBJECTIVES

Most studies on the costs of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) identify the total cost of the procedure with the direct cost, without considering important items such as overhead or intermediate costs. The objective of this study was to determine the cost per ART procedure in a public hospital in 2003 and to compare the results with those in the same hospital in 1998.

METHODS

Data from the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital in Granada (Spain) from 1998 and 2003 were analyzed. Since the total costs of the unit were known, the cost of the distinct ART procedures performed in the hospital was calculated by means of a methodology for cost distribution.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2003, the activity and costs of the Human Reproduction Unit analyzed evolved differently. Analysis of activity showed that some techniques, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection, were consolidated while others, such as stimulation without assisted reproduction or intracervical insemination were abandoned. In all procedures, unit costs per cycle and per delivery decreased in the period analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Important changes took place in the structure of costs of ART in the Human Reproduction Unit of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital between 1998 and 2003. Some techniques were discontinued, while others gained importance. Technological advances and structural innovations, together with a "learning effect," modified the structure of ART-related costs.

The use of urine LH detection kits to time intrauterine insemination with donor sperm

BACKGROUND

The study was carried out to determine the most likely time of day for the onset of the LH surge as detected using urine LH dipsticks, and to calculate the optimum time interval from the onset of the LH surge to intrauterine insemination (IUI).

METHODS

A prospective study of 1540 cycles of IUI with donor sperm at Cleveland Fertility Centre, Middlesbrough, between June 1990 and February 2004. Only 951 cycles (where a positive urine LH dipstick result was immediately preceded by a negative result) were included in our study. To determine the best time interval between the onset of the LH surge and IUI, women were divided into five subgroups according to the positive urine test-IUI time interval and the pregnancy rate and live birth rate per cycle were calculated for each group.

RESULTS

The first positive test was most frequently (44.5%) found at lunch-time (11:00-15:00). The live birth per cycle achieved was 5.6% when the insemination was performed 18-23 h from the first detection of the LH surge, and 11.7% when it was performed between 24 and 42 h. The live birth rate declined to 6.5% when IUI was performed later than that. Overall, no significant differences were discovered in live birth or pregnancy rate when insemination was performed at any of the time points between 18 and 53 h.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that lunch-time is the best time to check for the LH surge using urine dipsticks and insemination at any time between 18 and 53 h after the onset of the surge will produce optimal results.

Recovery of natural fertility after grafting of cryopreserved germinative tissue in ewes subjected to radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To recover natural fertility of ewes that were subjected to ovarian failure induced by radiotherapy with an autologous orthotopic graft of cryopreserved germinative tissue.

DESIGN

Experimental surgery study.

SETTING

University hospital unit.

ANIMAL(S)

Adult ewes.

INTERVENTION(S)

Four ewes were submitted to right oophorectomy and posterior dissecting and freezing of the germinative tissue. Afterward, they were administered radiotherapy to induce infertility on the remaining left ovary. Later, two of the ewes had the thawed fragments of the right ovary injected inside the cortex of the irradiated left ovary in a "sowing" procedure that eliminated the need for sutures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Recovery of fertility in ewes after transplantation of germinative tissue into the ovary destroyed by radiotherapy.

RESULT(S)

The ewes were housed with fertile rams. Six months following the grafting, the rams impregnated the transplanted ewes. More than 2 years after radiotherapy, the nongrafted (control) ewes have not become pregnant.

CONCLUSION(S)

Intracortical grafting of the germinative tissue circumvents the obstacle of vascular anastomosis with autologous ovarian implants. Patients could benefit from the subcortical grafting of germinative tissue in one of the ovaries, recovering fertility after radiotherapy treatment for malignancy.

Establishing an intrauterine insemination programme from a nursing perspective

The Centre for Reproductive Medicine in Bristol has been performing simple donor insemination for more than 10 years. Evidence indicates that intrauterine insemination using donated sperm results in higher success rates than intracervical insemination (Ford et al., 1997). As donor insemination at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine gives an overall success rate of 10% (January 1998 -- July 1999), which compares very favourably with other centres licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, the decision was taken to continue to offer this as the primary service and in addition to offer intrauterine insemination to certain categories of women. Extending the well-established donor insemination service to include intrauterine insemination was a natural progression for nurses already skilled in this area. The aim of this article is to share with other healthcare professionals the key involvement of specialist fertility nurses in the development of an intrauterine insemination programme.

A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and intracervical insemination (ICI) when used by fertile single women in a donor insemination program.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized crossover study.

SETTING

Donor insemination program (not an infertility clinic).

PATIENT(S)

Single fertile women choosing to inseminate with frozen donor semen.

INTERVENTION(S)

Clients received procreative counseling and screening and were then randomly assigned to begin office insemination with ICI or IUI. If additional insemination cycles were required, the clients used the method opposite their previous method of insemination until pregnancy was achieved.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Monthly fecundity rate was compared between the two methods of insemination.

RESULT(S)

Sixty-two women contributed a total of 189 cycles, 94 by IUI and 95 by ICI. The monthly fecundity rate for IUI was 15%, as compared with 9% for ICI, (P=0.14). When the analysis was confined to cycles in which only one insemination was performed (64 IUI and 65 ICI cycles), the monthly fecundity rates were 14% for IUI and 5% for ICI (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION(S)

Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm is more effective than intracervical insemination for single women without known fertility problems.

[Can donor insemination be optimised?]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the different donor insemination technics.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Analysis of the published studies about donor insemination which value the effectiveness of Intra Cervical Insemination (ICID) and Intra Uterine Insemination (IUID), the interest of ovulation induction, the possible complications, and the cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of the Cochrane data base (10 comparative studies IUID versus ICID, 2568 donor insemination cycles) lead to a pregnancy rate per cycle (PRC) 17.77% with IUID versus 7.68% with ICID. The odds ratio is 2.63 (CI from 1.85 to 3.73). With these PRC, the direct cost per evolutive pregnancy is 54,780 F with ICID and 25,675 F with IUID.

CONCLUSION

If it is possible to propose ICID to patient with an excellent regularity of ovulation. IUID with ovulation induction by gonadotropins is today the gold standard, and more especially as the law restrict the number of donor inseminations. Indeed, the IUID is two or three times more effective than ICID, consume the half of sperm straws, use a semen of moderate quality, there is no complication provided that the cycle is cancelled if there is more than two mature follicles and the cost-effectiveness ratio is greatly in favour with IUID.