An ounce of prevention: outpatient management of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Outpatient paracentesis for the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: study protocol for the STOP-OHSS randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most significant short-term complication of pharmacological ovarian stimulation. Symptoms range from mild abdominal discomfort to rare complications such as renal failure, thromboembolism and respiratory distress syndrome.Currently, clinical practice typically involves monitoring the patient until the condition becomes severe, at which point they are admitted to hospital, where drainage of ascitic fluid (paracentesis) may take place. Preliminary studies have indicated that earlier outpatient paracentesis may reduce the progression of OHSS and prevent hospitalisation in women.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This UK, multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, adaptive (group sequential with one interim analysis), open-label, superiority, confirmatory, group sequential, individually randomised controlled trial, with internal pilot will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of outpatient paracentesis versus conservative management (usual care) for moderate or severe OHSS. 224 women from 20 National Health Service and private fertility units will be randomised (1:1) and followed up for up to 13.5 months. The primary outcome is the rate of OHSS related hospital admission of at least 24 hours within 28 days postrandomisation. The primary analysis will be an intention to treat with difference in hospitalisation rates as measure of treatment effect. Secondary outcomes include time to resolution of symptoms, patient satisfaction, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. A qualitative substudy will facilitate the feasibility of recruitment. Participant recruitment commenced in June 2022.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

London-Southeast Research Ethics Committee approved the protocol (reference: 22/LO/0015). Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and abstracts to relevant national and international conferences, as well as being disseminated to trial participants and patient groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN71978064.

Outpatient management of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic review and a review of existing guidelines

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of assisted reproductive treatment. Management of women with severe OHSS has traditionally included hospitalisation for close monitoring and supportive treatment. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence for safety and efficacy of outpatient management of severe OHSS. A systematic review of studies describing outpatient management options was performed. Current guidance from advisory bodies was also reviewed. Outpatient management has been found in observational studies to be safe and cost-effective compared to inpatient management. Paracentesis of ascitic fluid seems to be effective treatment for severe OHSS along with supportive management including maintenance of fluid balance and preventative measures against thrombo-embolism. GnRH antagonist was shown in few studies to be effective in treatment of early severe OHSS although further research is required to assess its role in this context. Appropriate outpatient set up and protocols are essential to provide safe outpatient management for women with severe OHSS.

Volume expanders for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially fatal complication of ovarian stimulation which affects 1% to 14% of all in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A number of clinical studies with conflicting results have reported on the use of plasma expanders such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch (HES), mannitol, polygeline and dextran as a possible intervention for the prevention of OHSS. Women with very high estradiol levels, high numbers of follicles or oocytes retrieved, and women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), are at particularly high risk of developing OHSS. Plasma expanders are not commonly used nowadays in ovarian hyperstimulation. This is mainly because clinical evidence on their effectiveness remains sparse, because of the low incidence of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and the simultaneous introduction of mild stimulation approaches, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols and the freeze-all strategy for the prevention of OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness and safety of administration of volume expanders for the prevention of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched databases including the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and trial registers to September 2015; no date restrictions were used as new comparators were included in this search. The references of relevant publications were also searched. We attempted to contact authors to provide or clarify data that were unclear from trial or abstract reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing volume expanders versus placebo or no treatment for the prevention of OHSS in high-risk women undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation as part of any assisted reproductive technique.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted relevant data. The primary review outcome was moderate or severe OHSS. Other outcomes were live birth, pregnancy and adverse events. We combined data to calculate pooled Peto odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each intervention. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for each comparison, using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs (1867 women) comparing human albumin (seven RCTs) or HES (two RCTs) or mannitol (one RCT) versus placebo or no treatment for prevention of OHSS. The evidence was very low to moderate quality for all comparisons. The main limitations were imprecision, poor reporting of study methods, and failure to blind outcome assessment.There was evidence of a beneficial effect of intravenous albumin on OHSS, though heterogeneity was substantial (Peto OR 0.67 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95, seven studies, 1452 high risk women; I² = 69%, very low quality evidence) . This suggests that if the rate of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 12%, it will be about 9% (6% to12%) with the use of intravenous albumin. However, there was evidence of a detrimental effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 0.72 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94, I² = 42%, seven studies 1069 high risk women, moderate quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of pregnancy is 40% without treatment, it will be about 32% (27% to 38%) with the use of albumin.There was evidence of a beneficial effect of HES on OHSS (Peto OR 0.27 95% CI 0.12 to 0.59, I² = 0%, two studies, 272 women, very low quality evidence). This suggests that if the rate of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 16%, it will be about 5% (2% to 10%) with the use of HES. There was no evidence of an effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 1.20 95% CI 0.49 to 2.93, one study, 168 women, very low quality evidence).There was evidence of a beneficial effect of mannitol on OHSS (Peto OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64, one study, 226 women with PCOS, low quality evidence). This means that if the risk of moderate or severe OHSS with no treatment is 52%, it will be about 29% (19% to 41%) with mannitol. There was no evidence of an effect on pregnancy rates (Peto OR 0.85 95% CI 0.47 to 1.55; one study, 226 women, low quality evidence).Live birth rates were not reported in any of the studies. Adverse events appeared to be uncommon, but were too poorly reported to reach any firm conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that the plasma expanders assessed in this review (human albumin, HES and mannitol) reduce rates of moderate and severe OHSS in women at high risk. Adverse events appear to be uncommon, but were too poorly reported to reach any firm conclusions, and there were no data on live birth. However, there was evidence that human albumin reduces pregnancy rates. While there was no evidence that HES, or mannitol had any influence on pregnancy rates, the evidence of effectiveness was based on very few trials which need to be confirmed in additional, larger randomised controlled trials (RCTs) before they should be considered for routine use in clinical practice.

The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical aspects of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and provide recommendations on its prevention.

OPTIONS

Preventative measures, early recognition, and prompt systematic supportive care will help avoid poor outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Establish guidelines to assist in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, early recognition of the condition when it occurs, and provision of appropriate supportive measures in the correct setting.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 2011 to 2013 using appropriate controlled vocabulary ([OHSS] ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and: agonist IVF, antagonist IVF, metformin, HCG, gonadotropin, coasting, freeze all, agonist trigger, progesterone) and key words (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, ovarian stimulation, gonadotropin, human chorionic gonadotropin, prevention). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English. There were no date restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to February 2013. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). Summary Statements 1. The particular follicle-stimulating hormone formulation used for ovarian stimulation does not affect the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I) 2. Coasting may reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III) 3. Coasting for longer than 3 days reduces in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. (II-2) 4. The use of either luteinizing hormone or human chorionic gonadotropin for final oocyte maturation does not influence the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I) 5. There is no clear published evidence that lowering the human chorionic gonadotropin dose will result in a decrease in the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III) 6. Cabergoline starting from the day of human chorionic gonadotropin reduces the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients at higher risk and does not appear to lower in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. (II-2) 7. Avoiding pregnancy by freezing all embryos will prevent severe prolonged ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients at high risk. (II-2) 8. Pregnancy rates are not affected when using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in GnRH antagonist protocols for final egg maturation when embryos are frozen by vitrification for later transfer. (II-2) Recommendations 1. The addition of metformin should be considered in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome who are undergoing in vitro fertilization because it may reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I-A) 2. Gonadotropin dosing should be carefully individualized, taking into account the patient's age, body mass, antral follicle count, and previous response to gonadotropins. (II-3B) 3. Cycle cancellation before administration of human chorionic gonadatropin is an effective strategy for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, but the emotional and financial burden it imposes on patients should be considered before the cycle is cancelled. (III-C) 4. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist stimulation protocols are recommended in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The risk of severe OHSS in patients on GnRH antagonist protocols who have a very robust ovarian stimulation response can be reduced by using a GnRH agonist as a substitute for human chorionic gonadotropin to trigger final oocyte maturation. (I-B) 5. A gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with a GnRH agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation is recommended for donor oocyte and fertility preservation cycles. (III-C) 6. Albumin or other plasma expanders at the time of egg retrieval are not recommended for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (I-E) 7. Elective single embryo transfer is recommended in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III-C) 8. Progesterone, rather than human chorionic gonadotropin, should be used for luteal phase support. (I-A) 9. Outpatient culdocentesis should be considered for the prevention of disease progression in severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (II-2B).

Mild/minimal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation of patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Recently, an increased scientific interest was focused on mild approaches for ovarian stimulation in clinical practice. Milder stimulation aims to develop safer and more patient-friendly protocols which are more physiological, less drug use, less expensive and the risks of treatment are highly minimized.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a mild ovarian stimulation protocol in patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), compared to conventional long down-regulation protocol.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This a prospective, open, randomized study, included 349 infertile patients considered at high risk of developing OHSS, undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment in two private assisted reproduction centers. The patients were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 148) had a mild/minimal stimulation protocol of recombinant FSH (rFSH) combined with GnRH antagonist. Group B (n = 201) (control group) had a standard long protocol of rFSH combined with GnRH agonist.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference observed between the two groups regarding the mean number of oocytes retrieved per patient, mature metaphase II oocytes, fertilization rate, and embryo cleavage rate. Significantly higher implantation rate (21.5 vs 14.5 %) (p < 0.05), pregnancy rate (37.7 vs 23.4 %) (p < 0.05), and delivery rate (32.8 vs 20.1 %) (p < 0.05) were observed in favor of groups A compared to group B. Lower proportion of patients (4.7 %), though not statistically significant, has developed OHSS in group A compared to group B (8.4 %).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that mild stimulation regimen is highly effective for ovarian stimulation of patients who have experienced OHSS complication without increasing the risk of OHSS.

Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) as part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). While the safety and efficacy of ART is well established, physicians should always be aware of the risk of OHSS in patients undergoing COS, as it can be fatal. This article will briefly present the pathophysiology of OHSS, including the key role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), to provide the foundation for an overview of current techniques for the prevention of OHSS. Risk factors and predictive factors for OHSS will be presented, as recognizing these risk factors and individualizing the COS protocol appropriately is the key to the primary prevention of OHSS, as the benefits and risks of each COS strategy vary among individuals. Individualized COS (iCOS) could effectively eradicate OHSS, and the identification of hormonal, functional and genetic markers of ovarian response will facilitate iCOS. However, if iCOS is not properly applied, various preventive measures can be instituted once COS has begun, including cancelling the cycle, coasting, individualizing the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger dose or using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (for those using a GnRH antagonist protocol), the use of intravenous fluids at the time of oocyte retrieval, and cryopreserving/vitrifying all embryos for subsequent transfer in an unstimulated cycle. Some of these techniques have been widely adopted, despite the scarcity of data from randomized clinical trials to support their use.

The diagnosis and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical aspects of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and provide recommendations on its diagnosis and clinical management.

OUTCOMES

These guidelines will assist in the early recognition and management of ovarian hyperstimulation. Early recognition and prompt systematic supportive care will help avert poor outcomes.

EVIDENCE

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for relevant articles, using the key words "ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome" and "gonadotropins," and guidelines created by other professional societies were reviewed.

VALUES

The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1).

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Once the diagnosis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is made, disease severity should be classified as mild, moderate, severe, or critical. (III-B) 2. The physician prescribing gonadotropins should inform each woman of her personal risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (III-A) 3. In areas where patients do not have ready access to physicians familiar with the diagnosis and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the physician prescribing gonadotropins should ensure that women are made aware that they should contact a physician or a member of the team within the hospital unit who has relevant experience, should the need arise. (III-B) 4. Outpatient management is recommended for women with mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. If outpatient management for more severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is to be undertaken, the physician should ensure that the woman is capable of adhering to clinical instructions and that there is a system in place to assess her status every 1 to 2 days. (III-A) 5. Paracentesis should be performed in admitted patients with tense ascites to alleviate their discomfort. (II-2B) 6. Outpatient culdocentesis should be considered for the prevention of disease progression in moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (II-2B) 7. Women with severe and critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be admitted to hospital for intravenous hydration and observation. (III-A) 8. Intravenous hydration should be initiated with a crystalloid solution to prevent hemoconcentration and provide adequate end-organ perfusion. If end-organ perfusion is not maintained with a crystalloid solution, an alternate colloid solution should be administered. (II-2B) 9. Pain relief in admitted patients should be managed with acetaminophen and/or opioid analgesics. (III-B) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with antiplatelet properties should not be used. (III-B) 10. Women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be considered for treatment with prophylactic doses of anticoagulants. (II-2B) 11. Critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, according to the end organ affected. (III-C).

Update on management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a relatively common complication of ovarian stimulation and can be life threatening. The pathophysiology of OHSS is characterized by increased capillary permeability, leading to leakage of fluid from the vascular compartment, with third-space fluid accumulation and intravascular dehydration. The increased intra-abdominal pressure indicated that OHSS may be considered a compartment syndrome. Vascular endothelial growth factor, also known as vascular permeability factor, has emerged as one of the mediators intrinsic to the development of OHSS. Conventional management is focused on supportive care until the spontaneous resolution of the condition. The standard of care for treatment-monitoring of appropriate clinical parameters, fluid balance management, thrombosis prophylaxis, and ascites treatment-should prevent severe morbidity in most cases. This review will cover inpatient and outpatient management. The potential therapeutic approach targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system will be discussed.

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and treatment]

The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a major complication of ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization, with severe morbidity and possible mortality. Whereas its pathophysiology remains ill-established, the VEGF may play a key role as well as coagulation disturbances. Risk factors for severe OHSS may be related to patients characteristics or to the management of the ovarian stimulation. Two types of OHSS are usually distinguished: the early OHSS, immediately following the ovulation triggering and a later and more severe one, occurring in case of pregnancy. As no etiologic treatment is available, the therapeutic management of OHSS should focus on its related-complications. Thrombotic complications that can occur in venous or arterial vessels represent the major risk of OHSS, possibly conducting to myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accidents. Once the OHSS is diagnosed, prevention of thrombotic accidents remains the major issue.

Intra-venous fluids for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially fatal complication of ovarian stimulation, which affects 1% to 14% of all in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A number of clinical studies with conflicting results have reported on the use of intravenous fluids such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch, Haemaccel® and dextran as a possible way for preventing the severe form of OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness and safety of administration of intravenous fluids such as albumin, hydroxyethyl starch, Haemaccel® and dextran in the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, to third quarter 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2010), EMBASE (1980 to November 2010) and The National Research Register (to November 2010). The citation lists of relevant publications, review articles, abstracts of scientific meetings and included studies were also searched. The authors were contacted to provide or clarify data that were unclear from the trial reports.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effects of intravenous fluids with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of severe OHSS in high risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently scanned the abstracts, identified relevant papers, assessed inclusion of trials and trial quality and extracted relevant data. Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, allocation concealment and outcomes. Where possible, data were pooled for analysis. A separate analysis of studies was performed for human albumin and hydroxyethyl starch versus placebo or no treatment. Other potential intravenous fluids have been identified, such as Haemaccel and dextran, however no randomised controlled studies on their applicability could be found.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs involving 1660 (human albumin vs placebo) and 487 (HES vs placebo) randomised women, have been included in this review. There was a borderline statistically significant decrease in the incidence of severe OHSS with administration of human albumin (8 RCTs, OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99).There was a statistically significant decrease in severe OHSS incidence with administration of hydroxyethyl starch (3 RCTs, OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.40). There was no evidence of statistical difference in the pregnancy rate between both groups of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence of benefit from intra-venous albumin administration at the time of oocyte retrieval in the prevention or reduction of the incidence of severe OHSS in high risk women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles. Hydroxyethyl starch markedly decreases the incidence of severe OHSS.

C-reactive protein as the indicator of severity in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

To establish correlations between laboratory findings and clinical symptoms of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Department of obstetrics and gynecology, public clinical hospital.

PATIENTS

Nineteen women admitted to the public hospital with a diagnosis of OHSS. The procedure of controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) was performed in the private assisted reproductive technology centre.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected, ultrasound examination of ovaries, abdominal circumference measurement were performed, intravenous crystalloids, plasma expanders such colloids and albumin were given. Correlations between mean laboratory results (haematocrit, c-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count, serum protein, serum albumin), ovarian size in ultrasound examination, abdominal circumference, and amount of albumin and hydroxyethyl starch transfused to the patient were assessed.

RESULTS

Significant correlation was observed between CRP concentration and abdominal circumference measured when the patient was admitted to the department, between CRP concentration and ovarian size measured during ultrasound examination at admission and between CRP concentration and body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP can be a potential candidate to an indicator of OHSS severity.

Cost analysis model of outpatient management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with paracentesis: "tap early and often" versus hospitalization

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost of two treatment regimens for moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): conservative inpatient versus outpatient management with paracentesis.

DESIGN

A decision-tree mathematical model comparing conservative inpatient versus outpatient management of moderate to severe OHSS was created. The common final pathway of either management was resolution of OHSS. Sensitivity analyses were performed over the range of variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Total management cost of OHSS.

RESULT(S)

The cost of conservative therapy including first-tier complications was $10,099 (range $9,655-$15,044). The cost of outpatient management with paracentesis was $1954 (range $788-$12,041). This resulted in an estimated cost savings of $8145 with outpatient management with paracentesis. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Varying the probability of admission after outpatient treatment still indicated that outpatient treatment was the most cost-effective (probability = 1.0, cost = $6110). Varying the duration of hospitalization with primary inpatient treatment was equal to outpatient treatment costs only at a stay of 0.71 days or shorter.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our model suggests early outpatient paracentesis for moderate to severe OHSS is the most cost-effective management plan when compared with traditional conservative inpatient therapy. The cost savings for outpatient management persisted throughout a variety of outcome probabilities.

Patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome can be managed safely with aggressive outpatient transvaginal paracentesis

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with aggressive outpatient transvaginal paracentesis to manage ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Private, academically affiliated IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

Women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and having a diagnosis of OHSS.

INTERVENTION(S)

Management of OHSS with hospitalization or outpatient transvaginal paracentesis between 1999 and 2007.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Grade and stage of OHSS, need for hospitalization, and adverse events.

RESULT(S)

From 1999 to 2007, we identified 183 patients with OHSS. We began performing outpatient transvaginal paracentesis to treat OHSS in 2002. We have performed 146 outpatient transvaginal paracenteses in 96 patients with no procedure-related complications. With the implementation of early, aggressive, outpatient paracentesis, the number of patients requiring hospitalization for OHSS decreased. From 2006 to 2007, 29 patients were diagnosed with severe OHSS and 25 (86%) were managed as outpatients with transvaginal paracentesis with no complications.

CONCLUSION(S)

This report represents one of the largest series of patients with OHSS managed with outpatient transvaginal paracentesis. Although there continues to be a small percentage of patients with OHSS who require hospitalization, the vast majority of patients with severe OHSS at our center in the past 2 years had their condition successfully managed as outpatients with use of aggressive transvaginal paracentesis.

Bladder hematoma after vaginal paracentesis

Puncture of the bladder wall with a 17-gauge needle is usually safe; however, in the patient on anticoagulation, inadvertent puncture of the bladder could result in bladder hematoma formation.

Odds of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) - time for reassessment

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the odds of OHSS hospital admission in relation to oestradiol levels on day of hCG administration and number of oocytes collected.

METHODS

We performed a 24 months retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients receiving ART treatment in a University teaching hospital including all patients requiring admission due to OHSS. Main outcome measures were oestradiol levels, number of oocytes collected and incidence of admission with OHSS.

RESULTS

OHSS requiring admission to hospital occurred in 1.8% of cases. While no patients with an oestradiol level at hCG </=15,000 pmol/L developed OHSS, those with oestradiol levels >/=15,000 pmol/L had different risks of admission according to the number of oocytes collected: those with >30 oocytes were 6.7 times more likely to be admitted that those with <20 oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies an oestradiol level (>/=15,000 pmol/L) and number of oocytes (>/=20) above which the odds of being admitted with OHSS increases significantly. Although OHSS cannot always be prevented, these measurable parameters should be used to allow appropriate counselling and subsequent safe management of ART patients.

Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques

Infertility may affect one in six couples; however, the development of the assisted reproduction technique (ART) created the opportunity for a large proportion of the infertile population to bear children. Pharmacological agents are routinely used in ART, and new ones are introduced regularly, with the aim of retrieving multiple oocytes to increase the prospect of pregnancy. The combinations of drugs that are used have specific adverse effects, but it is mostly the combined action of more than one agent that causes the greatest concern. The matter is complicated by the suspicion that some techniques in ART, for example intracytoplasmic sperm injection for severe male infertility problems (including azoospermia), may also contribute to the increase in adverse effects, especially congenital malformation. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. It may give rise to a short period of estradiol withdrawal symptoms and it may also lead to luteal phase deficiency. Similarly GnRHa antagonists, which have been recently introduced to control ovarian hyperstimulation, can lead to luteal phase deficiency and may cause some local injection site reactions. The more pure form of gonadotropin leads to less local injection site reactions and their main adverse effects are associated with the consequences of multiple ovulations. It has been proposed that gonadotropins may be a factor in the increasing risk of ovarian cancer and possibly breast cancer, but this has not been substantiated. Prion infection is another potential hazard, although no cases have been reported. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a well recognised complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ART. It is usually a result of recruitment of a large number of ovarian follicles. Efforts to minimise the incidence of this syndrome and its severity are now well developed. Congenital malformations are another possible adverse effect of fertility drugs, but it is more probable that the increase in congenital abnormality that is reported in ART is because of the population studied, i.e. patients already at high risk of congenital malformation, rather than the fertility drugs used or the technique employed. High order multiple pregnancy and its sequela is a well established complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. This could be a result of multiple ovulations or more than one embryo replacement. Reducing the number of embryos transferred can reduce this more serious adverse effect for expectant mothers and for children conceived from ART.

Hyperstimulation ovarienne : place de la chirurgie

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a iatrogenic complication that could happen during ovulation induction. Metabolic modifications can lead to a third sector and organic failure. Medical treatment, undertaken in first line, may be insufficient. In these cases, invasive treatment, using surgical techniques, in association with reanimation principles becomes necessary. From the simple drainage to final measures for the patient's rescue, this review describes the different solutions and their respective place. Several means exist, but serious evaluation is lacking. Their use should be indicated specifically. Medico-surgical associations seemed to offer interesting results.

Low-molecular-weight dextran infusion is more effective for the treatment of hemoconcentration due to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome than human albumin infusion

The most severe complication of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is thromboembolism, which is related to hemoconcentration. Dextran 40 infusion has greater effectiveness for the treatment of hemoconcentration due to OHSS than does human albumin infusion.

Prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially fatal condition with a pathophysiology that is not clearly understood. A shift in fluid from the extravascular space occurs, thought to be induced by cytokines and/or vascular endothelial growth factor. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), exogenous or endogenous, seems to be the triggering mechanism, resulting in early and late development of the syndrome, respectively. The management of the syndrome is mainly symptomatic. Preventive strategies are being developed and constantly refined. Women at increased risk of OHSS need to be on the lowest possible dose of gonadotrophin with the aim of reducing the granulosa/luteal cell mass. Ultrasound and serum oestradiol (E2) measurements are, at present, the main methods used to identify and monitor those at risk during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Withholding gonadotrophin stimulation (coasting), but continuing down-regulation, when a large number of follicles (greater than 20) and a rising serum oestradiol level are seen, is the most widely favoured and used preventive measure and the most cost effective. Management is symptomatic and aimed at achieving fluid balance, restoring plasma volume and improving renal function. This may be combined with an early resort to ascitic fluid aspiration, which will improve the feeling of wellbeing and may remove those agents responsible for the syndrome. Heparin, to prevent the risk of thromboembolism as a result of haemoconcentration, is important.

Effect of paracentesis of ascitic fluids on urinary output and blood indices in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the isolated effect of abdominal paracentesis of ascitic fluid in women with severe OHSS on urine production and blood indices.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional study.

SETTING

Gynecology department at the Lis Maternity Hospital, affiliated to Tel Aviv University.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty women with severe OHSS.

INTERVENTION(S)

Abdominal paracentesis according to clinical indications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Urinary output, blood urea nitrogen, as well as a complete blood count were measured before and following the procedure.

RESULT(S)

Urinary output increased from 1890 +/- 128 mL per 24 hours on the day before paracentesis to 2,660 +/- 226 mL per 24 hours after the procedure. Blood urea nitrogen values were 8.9 +/- 0.56 mg/dL and 7.8 +/- 0.53 mg/dL on the days before and after paracentesis, respectively. White blood cell count decreased from 15.4 +/- 1.1 (x 10(3) cells/mm(3)) on the days before the paracentesis to 13.3 +/- 0.9 (x 10(3) cells/mm(3)) after the procedure. Hematocrit was reduced significantly from 35.2 +/- 1.0% before the paracentesis to 33.4 +/- 0.8% after paracentesis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Paracentesis of ascitic fluids in women with severe OHSS has an isolated effect in improving renal function, as is evident by the increased urinary output and reduced blood urea nitrogen.

Perforated duodenal ulcer associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Case Report

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains the most serious medical complication of controlled ovarian stimulation. An unusual case of perforated duodenal ulcer following critical OHSS is presented. A 29 year old nulligravid woman with polycystic ovarian syndrome underwent her first attempt at in-vitro fertilization. She was admitted to the hospital with critical OHSS and subsequently found to have a perforated posterior duodenal ulcer. She underwent exploratory laparotomy, antrectomy and gastrojejunostomy. Pathological analysis of her gastric antrum confirmed chronic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori. She required prolonged assisted ventilation, vasopressor support, multiple i.v. antibiotics, blood product replacement and nutritional support. The patient was hospitalized for a total of 47 days and then transferred to a rehabilitation facility for an additional 30 days before being discharged to home. In this critically ill patient with OHSS, severe stress associated with invasive monitoring and multiple medical therapies in the intensive care unit as well as H. pylori infection appear to be the most probable causative factors of her perforated viscus. Prompt recognition of potential complications and proper medical intervention are essential in the management of patients with OHSS. Avoidance strategies are still needed.