Endoscopic practice at the start of the new millennium

Monitored anesthesia care with propofol versus surgeon-monitored sedation with benzodiazepines and narcotics for preoperative endoscopy in the morbidly obese

BACKGROUND

Although still controversial, upper endoscopy is frequently performed before bariatric surgery. This study investigated the hypothesis that morbidly obese patients would prefer anesthesiologist-monitored sedation (AMS) compared to surgeon-monitored sedation (SMS) during preoperative endoscopy.

METHODS

All patients who underwent endoscopy before their bariatric surgery were given a post-procedure survey regarding their experience with the preoperative endoscopy. The survey inquired about issues during and after the procedure. We compared patients who had AMS with IV propofol versus SMS IV narcotics and benzodiazepines.

RESULTS

There were 100 patients (SMS=49 and AMS=51). Few patients complained of pain in the abdomen or throat during the procedure (AMS vs. SMS=2 vs. 8% and 2 vs. 10%, respectively; p=NS). More patients complained about throat pain after the procedure (AMS vs. SMS=37 vs. 45%; p=NS). More patients in the SMS group remembered the scope being placed in the mouth versus AMS (33 vs. 10%; p<0.02). More patients remembered gagging during the procedure in the SMS group versus the AMS group, but this did not reach statistical significance (24 vs. 10%; p=0.06). There was a trend that more patients in the AMS group felt they recovered in less than 1 h (53%) compared to the SMS group (37%; p=0.1).

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo upper endoscopy with either AMS or SMS seem to tolerate the procedure well. The preliminary benefits seen with AMS need to be further explored. AMS should be considered for patients undergoing preoperative upper endoscopy before bariatric surgery.

Cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. An evidence-based analysis and guide for physicians and patients

The risk of cancer in IBD is real and is a cause of anxiety and concern among patients and practitioners. Current modalities for detecting dysplasia in IBD are crude and insensitive and subject to observer and sampling bias. This evidence-based review confirms a significant increased risk for colorectal cancer among patients with pancolonic UC and, to a lesser extent, in patients with left-sided disease. Risk increases with longer duration of disease; early age at diagnosis; coexisting PSC; and, perhaps, a family history of colorectal cancer. Physicians must pay greater attention to the manner in which they implement surveillance colonoscopies, including paying heed to the location and number of biopsy specimens required to maximize the benefit. With respect to CD, the evidence suggests that patients with extensive colonic involvement of long duration carry a similar risk of colorectal cancer to patients with UC and should be considered candidates for surveillance colonoscopy.

Gastroduodenoscopy in the dog and cat

Endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract in dogs and cats is a relatively recent development. It was just over 20 years ago, in 1978, that the first series report of GI endoscopy in dogs and cats was presented. In those initial days, endoscopy was truly a novelty, and the primary uses for endoscopes were to retrieve foreign objects or visualize the esophagus and stomach. It was not until the mid-1980s that technology and training made gastroduodenoscopy standard practice. The evolution in endoscopic technology has also mirrored the evolution in computers and imaging modalities. The original fiberoptic endoscopes, although still available, are giving way to video endoscopy and digital imaging capabilities that provide spectacular images and an ability to generate hard copy images for medical records, teaching purposes, and research data that was previously not possible.

Sedation for endoscopy

A review of the recent literature reveals an increasing published opinion in favour of unsedated endoscopy. However, recent studies show that the majority of US patients are unwilling or unable to tolerate this. In order for there to be a shift towards unsedated endoscopy, physicians will have to change patients' expectations. The indications for diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures continue to expand, involving increasingly complex techniques that require a high degree of patient cooperation. There is still a need to refine the sedative regimen for these cases.