Esophageal infections in immunosuppressed patients after marrow transplantation

Esophagitis in a Post-Liver Transplant Patient: A Case of Cytomegalovirus and Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Coinfection

In post-liver transplant patients, esophagitis presents a diagnostic and management challenge due to the potential for opportunistic infections. This case describes a 59-year-old female with primary sclerosing cholangitis who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation six years prior. She presented with dysphagia, and her medical history included immunosuppression with prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate and a history of achalasia treated with esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed severe esophagitis with extensive ulcerations, raising suspicion for infectious etiologies such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1). The biopsy confirmed a rare coinfection of CMV and HSV-1, which was characterized histologically by viral cytopathic effects and immunohistochemical staining. Treatment with valganciclovir and temporary cessation of mycophenolate led to symptom resolution and viral clearance. Follow-up EGD demonstrated healing of esophageal ulcers, with subsequent findings of Candida esophagitis but no evidence of CMV or HSV recurrence. This case highlights the importance of early endoscopic evaluation and biopsy in immunocompromised patients with esophagitis. CMV and HSV-1 coinfection, while rare, should be considered in this population due to its association with severe complications such as perforation and bleeding. Timely antiviral therapy and immunosuppression adjustment are critical for favorable outcomes.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the noncytomegalovirus herpesviruses

Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and other cellular therapies have significantly improved outcomes in the management of multiple hematological and nonhematological malignancies, the resulting impairment in humoral and cellular response increases the risk for opportunistic infection as an undesirable side effect. With their ability to establish latent infection and reactivate when the host immune system is at its weakest point, the Herpesviridae family constitutes a significant proportion of these opportunistic pathogens. Despite recent advancements in preventing and managing herpesvirus infections, they continue to be a common cause of significant morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients. Herein, we aim to provide and update on herpesvirus other than cytomegalovirus (CMV) affecting recipients of HSCT and other cellular therapies.

Herpetic Esophagitis: A Cause of Dysphagia in a Malnourished Patient

Herpetic esophagitis (HE) is an esophageal infection caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV). Although less common, it can occasionally affect immunocompetent hosts. It can manifest as odynophagia and/or dysphagia and should lead to an investigation by upper digestive endoscopy with a biopsy. The authors report a case of a 65-year-old man with a past medical history relevant for schizophrenia, oligophrenia, and malnutrition, and no other history or evidence of immunosuppression, who presented with severe dysphagia over weeks and recent episodes of food aspiration with consequent pneumonia. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, revealing severe stenosis at the level of the gastroesophageal junction with scar tissue, not transposable with the endoscope. The biopsy led to the diagnosis of hepatic esophagitis. Despite the immunocompetent status (excepting only the risk factor malnutrition) and treatment with acyclovir, with initial clinical improvement, the patient died a few weeks after diagnosis after multiple respiratory complications such as nosocomial infection. This case highlights that herpetic esophagitis is sometimes observed in immunocompetent hosts. HE has a self-limited course, with severe complications more frequent in immunosuppressed patients. However, it is also important to suspect this condition in immunocompetent patients and look for risk factors, given the potential morbidity this disease entails. In this group of patients, the presence of predisposing factors and associated comorbidities, such as malnutrition, alcohol consumption, or use of corticosteroids, have been associated with the development of viral esophagitis (including HE). HE remains a clinical challenge, especially in patients with risk factors for immunosuppression, such as malnutrition, as in the reported case.

A Case of Left Ventricular Thrombus and Herpetic Esophagitis in an Immunocompetent Patient With COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been associated with thrombosis, both venous and arterial, but the mechanism behind this coagulation is not fully understood. Several cases involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT), particularly in those with low ejection fraction, have been reported. This report describes a case of a 57-year-old male patient who presented to the hospital with altered mental status and a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. CT of the chest revealed the presence of an LVT, and transthoracic echocardiography showed a reduced ejection fraction and confirmed the presence of the thrombus. The patient also reported epigastric chest pain and several bloody bowel movements. A colonoscopy revealed internal hemorrhoids. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed the presence of multiple esophageal ulcers, and biopsy results confirmed herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. The patient had no history of organ or bone marrow transplant, long-term immunosuppressive therapy, or HIV infection. He was eventually discharged on apixaban for his LVT and acyclovir for his HSV esophagitis.

Persistent Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection of Enteric Neurons Triggers CD8+ T Cell Response and Gastrointestinal Neuromuscular Dysfunction

Behind the central nervous system, neurotropic viruses can reach and persist even in the enteric nervous system (ENS), the neuronal network embedded in the gut wall. We recently reported that immediately following orogastric (OG) administration, Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 infects murine enteric neurons and recruits mononuclear cells in the myenteric plexus. In the current work, we took those findings a step forward by investigating the persistence of HSV-1 in the ENS and the local adaptive immune responses against HSV-1 that might contribute to neuronal damage in an animal model. Our study demonstrated specific viral RNA transcripts and proteins in the longitudinal muscle layer containing the myenteric plexus (LMMP) up to 10 weeks post HSV-1 infection. CD3+CD8+INFγ+ lymphocytes skewed towards HSV-1 antigens infiltrated the myenteric ganglia starting from the 6th week of infection and persist up to 10 weeks post-OG HSV-1 inoculation. CD3+CD8+ cells isolated from the LMMP of the infected mice recognized HSV-1 antigens expressed by infected enteric neurons. In vivo, infiltrating activated lymphocytes were involved in controlling viral replication and intestinal neuromuscular dysfunction. Indeed, by depleting the CD8+ cells by administering specific monoclonal antibody we observed a partial amelioration of intestinal dysmotility in HSV-1 infected mice but increased expression of viral genes. Our findings demonstrate that HSV-1 persistently infects enteric neurons that in turn express viral antigens, leading them to recruit activated CD3+CD8+ lymphocytes. The T-cell responses toward HSV-1 antigens persistently expressed in enteric neurons can alter the integrity of the ENS predisposing to neuromuscular dysfunction.

Herpes simplex virus esophagitis-clinical challenges in the elderly

A 77-year-old woman presented with a 2-week history of malaise, prostration, anorexia, abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea. She had been taking systemic corticosteroids for the past year. During hospitalisation, renal insufficiency, ionic changes and liver function abnormalities were detected and corrected. However, the patient developed total dysphagia. UGE revealed multiple shallow ulcers below the cricopharyngeal level and in the distal oesophagus, with normal-appearing intervening mucosa. Histological examination allowed the diagnosis of herpes simplex virus esophagitis. Treatment with intravenous acyclovir was instituted for 14 days. In the elderly, herpetic esophagitis may present with non-specific complains, such as prostration or anorexia. In the reported case, dysphagia was only detected as a late symptom, addressing the importance of maintaining a high degree of suspicion for the diagnosis of herpes simplex virus esophagitis.

Esophageal Cytomegalovirus and Herpes Simplex virus co-infection in an immunocompromised patient: Case report and review of literature

Herpes simplex virus and Cytomegalovirus co-infection has been reported to occur in a variety of sites in immunocompromised patients. To our knowledge, few cases of such co-infection have been reported to occur in the esophagus. We report a case of a 60-year-old woman who was maintained on immunosuppressive therapy for a presumed diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris, who presented with odynophagia. Investigations revealed ulcerative esophagitis caused by both HSV and CMV. The patient was treated with valganciclovir with full recovery. We also present the results of various studies on patients with similar presentation particularly those caused by HSV and CMV co-infection.

Gastroenterological complications in kidney transplant patients

Kidney transplantation is the surgical operation by which one of the two original kidneys is replaced with another healthy one donated by a compatible individual. In most cases, donors are recently deceased. There is the possibility of withdrawing a kidney from a consenting living subject. Usually, living donors are direct family members, but they could be volunteers completely unrelated to the recipient. A much-feared complication in case of kidney transplantation is the appearance of infections. These tend to arise due to immune-suppressor drugs administered as anti-rejection therapy. In this review, we describe the gastrointestinal complications that can occur in subjects undergoing renal transplantation associated with secondary pathogenic microorganisms or due to mechanical injury during surgery or to metabolic or organic toxicity correlated to anti-rejection therapy. Some of these complications may compromise the quality of life or pose a significant risk of mortality; fortunately, many of them can be prevented and treated without the stopping the immunosuppression, thus avoiding the patient being exposed to the risk of rejection episodes.

Herpes Virus Infections Other than Cytomegalovirus in the Recipients of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

This review discusses the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of herpes viruses other than cytomegalovirus in patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Variations in the Clinical Course of Patients with Herpes Simplex Virus Esophagitis Based on Immunocompetence and Presence of Underlying Esophageal Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Herpes simplex esophagitis (HSE) is the second most common cause of infectious esophagitis and occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to reappraise the clinical course of HSE in different patient populations based on degree of immunocompetence and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease.

METHODS

Patients with histopathologically confirmed HSE identified from the Mayo Clinic pathology database from 2006 to 2016 were included in this study. Relevant demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were retrospectively reviewed and compared between two cohorts: (a) immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients and (b) patients with and without underlying esophageal disorders.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included in the study. The most common presenting symptoms were odynophagia (34.8%) and dysphagia (30.4%). Thirty-three (71.7%) patients were immunocompromised, and these patients who experienced longer duration of symptoms (25.5 ± 23.4 days vs. 7.0 ± 5.5 days, p = 0.04) were more likely to require an extension of treatment course (38.1% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.05) compared to their immunocompetent counterparts. Seventeen (37%) patients had underlying esophageal disease, and these patients were more likely to have concomitant esophageal candidiasis (41.2% vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Herpes simplex virus causes esophagitis in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While the disease course appears to be self-limited for all patient populations, clinical and endoscopic differences in the disease presentation and clinical course based on immune status and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease exist.

Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

Differential diagnosis between herpes simplex virus (HSV) esophagitis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis is challenging because there are many similarities and overlaps between their endoscopic features. The aims of this study were to investigate the implications of the endoscopic findings for the diagnosis of HSV and CMV esophagitis, and to develop a predictive model for differentiating CMV esophagitis from HSV esophagitis.Patients who underwent endoscopic examination and had pathologically-confirmed HSV or CMV esophagitis were eligible. Clinical characteristics and endoscopic features were retrospectively reviewed and categorized. A predictive model was developed based on parameters identified by logistic regression analysis.During the 8-year study period, HSV and CMV esophagitis were diagnosed in 85 and 63 patients, respectively. The endoscopic features of esophagitis were categorized and scored as follows: category 1 (-3 points): discrete ulcers or ulcers with vesicles, bullae, or pseudomembranes, category 2 (-2 points): coalescent or geographic ulcers, category 3 (1 points): ulcers with an uneven base, friability, or with a circumferential distribution, category 4 (2 points): punched-out, serpiginous, or healing ulcers with yellowish exudates. And previous history of transplantation (2 point) was included in the model as a discriminating clinical feature. The optimal cutoff point of the prediction model was 0 (area under receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.967), with positive scores favoring CMV esophagitis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.8%, 89.4%, 92.6%, 87.3%, and 97.5%, respectively.The predictive model based on endoscopic and clinical findings appears to be accurate and useful in differentiating CMV esophagitis from HSV esophagitis.

Infections of the esophagus: an update on risk factors, diagnosis, and management

Infectious esophagitis is a leading cause of esophagitis worldwide. While esophageal infections have traditionally been associated with immunocompromised patients, these disorders are becoming increasingly recognized in immunocompetent individuals. The three most common etiologies of infectious esophagitis are Candida, herpes simplex virus, and cytomegalovirus. Human papilloma virus infection can also involve the esophagus in the form of ulcerative lesions and papillomas. Less common etiologies include various other fungal, bacterial, and viral organisms. This review provides a comprehensive update on risk factors, diagnosis, and management of both common and less common infections of the esophagus.

Unique causes of esophageal inflammation: a histopathologic perspective

Gastroenterologists frequently perform endoscopic esophageal mucosal biopsies for pathologic diagnosis in patients experiencing symptoms of esophagitis. The more common causes of esophagitis diagnosed on esophageal mucosal biopsy include reflux esophagitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and infectious esophagitis caused by Candida albicans, herpes simplex virus, and/or cytomegalovirus. However, there are several causes of esophagitis seen less frequently by pathologists that are very important to recognize. We discuss unique types of esophageal inflammation, including acute bacterial esophagitis, esophageal manifestations of dermatologic diseases, medication-induced esophageal injury, and sloughing esophagitis; and we review their clinical and histopathologic features.

Bacterial Ulcerative Esophagitis in an Immunocompetent Patient

Bacterial esophagitis is a very rare condition usually occurring in patients with immunosuppression. To our best knowledge, bacterial esophagitis without underlying immunosuppressive disease has not been reported. We report an immunocompetent patient with bacterial esophagitis caused by B-hemolytic Streptococcus which resulted in an esophageal stricture. A 68-year-old female was admitted for odynophagia which had developed several days before. Upper endoscopy revealed extensive ulceration covered by whitish exudates with submucosal edema at the proximal esophagus. She was treated with steroids and empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. Within 14 days the symptoms improved. Since growth of B-hemolytic Streptococcus was detected in nasal smear culture, bacterial esophagitis was suspected. Gram staining was carried out on the already obtained tissue that had been fixed with formalin. There was heavy infiltration with gram-positive cocci morphologically consistent with Streptococcus. Since the bacterial colony was demonstrated histologically, the diagnosis of bacterial esophagitis caused by B-hemolytic Streptococcus was confirmed. In addition, complete resolution of the inflammation following antibiotics therapy was further evidence of the bacterial cause of the esophagitis.

Clinical Characteristics and Manifestation of Herpes Esophagitis: One Single-center Experience in Taiwan

We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with herpes esophagitis (HE) based on endoscopic typing.Herpes simplex virus infection in the gastrointestinal tract primarily affects the esophagus. However, little is known about the presentation, endoscopic findings, and outcomes of HE.From 2003 to 2013, 47 patients with HE were identified histologically from among 1843 patients with esophageal ulcers. Personal data, underlying disease, esophagogastroduodenoscopy indication, endoscopic characteristics, pathological findings, laboratory data, and outcomes were collected. Endoscopic findings were classified into 3 types based on gross appearance and were correlated with clinical presentation.The mean age of patients was 62.04 ± 14.76 years, and most patients were men (39/47, 83%). The most common symptoms were odynophagia/dysphagia (20/47, 42.6%). Whereas 25 patients (53.2%) were diagnosed with malignancy, it was related to human immunodeficiency virus in only 1 patient (2.1%). HE was classified into 3 types based on endoscopic images: type I (n = 19), type II (n = 10), and type III (n = 18). The majority of patients with HE type III had sepsis (72%) and obvious leukocytosis than the other 2 types (P = 0.03). The overall mortality rate was 6.4% (3/47), and most of the patients who died (66.7% [2/3]) belonged to the endoscopic classification type III group. Clinical parameters were analyzed for the risk of poor outcome. Postchemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were associated with 30-day mortality after appearance of HE (P < 0.05).Herpes esophagitis primarily affects men and patients with malignancy or sepsis. However, the disease is usually self-limiting, and HE-related mortality is low. Relationship between severity of endoscopic findings and patients' outcome remains questionable. Further prospective study is needed.

Intractable hiccups due to herpetic esophagitis in an immunocompromised patient

Introduction

Herpes virus family's association with visceral lesions is well established. Herpes simplex virus presentations vary based on immune status. Intractable hiccups due to herpes simplex esophagitis, to the best of our knowledge have been described twice in the literature. We present a 68 year-old immunocompromised male with intractable hiccups for 10 months.

Case

68 year-old male with end-stage renal disease and multiple myeloma presented with coffee ground emesis and hiccups of ten months duration. A year earlier, he received cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone, remaining on lenalidomide. During chemotherapy, he developed pneumococcal meningitis and subsequently intractable hiccups. Preceding admission, endoscopy showed duodenitis and esophagitis. Proton-pump inhibitor therapy was initiated; however, biopsy was not performed.

During admission, hiccups often occurred every few seconds while off anti-emetics, persisting despite therapy. Exam showed cachexia/temporal wasting, aphthous stomatitis and abdominal tenderness. MRI of brain/spine, CT of neck, chest, abdomen and neurological evaluation were unremarkable. Endoscopy revealed gastritis and esophagitis with mucosal tears. Biopsy revealed intra-nuclear inclusions with multi-nucleated cells, consistent with herpes virus, later confirmed as herpes simplex by immunostaining. Hiccups and emesis resolved after of 2 days of intravenous acyclovir. 21 days of treatment were completed with oral valacyclovir. He remained free of hiccups during the remaining hospital stay and follow up.

This case illustrates an exceptionally rare presentation of herpetic esophagitis in an immunocompromised host. As novel immunotherapeutic/suppressive agents continue to emerge, the evolving role of herpes virus prophylaxis and diagnosis of atypical presentations in new host populations is a topic of growing importance.

Etiology, diagnosis and treatment of infectious esophagitis

Infectious esophagitis may be caused by fungal, viral, bacterial or even parasitic agents. Risk factors include antibiotics and steroids use, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, malignancies and immunodeficiency syndromes including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Acute onset of symptoms such as dysphagia and odynophagia is typical. It can coexist with heartburn, retrosternal discomfort, nausea and vomiting. Abdominal pain, anorexia, weight loss and even cough are present sometimes. Infectious esophagitis is predominantly caused by Candida species. Other important causes include cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus infection.

The gastrointestinal complications of oncologic therapy

A spectrum of oncologic treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and molecular targeted therapies is available to combat cancer. These treatments are associated with adverse effects in several organ systems including the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The immunocompromised state induced by oncologic therapy is also an important contributing factor underlying GI complications. This review discusses common GI complications that can result from cancer therapy. The pathologic mechanisms underlying each complication and the pharmacology of the agents used to treat these complications are discussed.

Herpes simplex esophagitis in immunocompetent host: a case report

Introduction. Herpes simplex esophagitis is well recognized in immunosuppressed subjects, but it is infrequent in immunocompetent patients. We present a case of HSE in a 53-year-old healthy man. Materials and Methods. The patient was admitted with dysphagia, odynophagia, and retrosternal chest pain. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed minute erosive area in distal esophagus and biopsies confirmed esophagitis and findings characteristic of Herpes Simplex Virus infection. Results. The patients was treated with high dose of protonpump inhibitor, sucralfate, and acyclovir, orally, with rapid resolution of symptoms. Discussion. HSV type I is the second most common cause of infectious esophagitis. The majority of symptomatic immunocompetent patients with HSE will present with an acute onset of esophagitis. Endoscopic biopsies from the ulcer edges should be obtained for both histopathology and viral culture. In immunocompetent host, HSE is generally a self-limited condition. Conclusions. HSE should be suspected in case of esophagitis without evident cause, even if the patient is immunocompetent. When the diagnosis of HSE is confirmed, careful history and assessment for an immune disorder such as HIV infection is crucial, to look for underlying immune deficiency.

Esophageal candidiasis in an immunocompetent girl

BACKGROUND

Infections of the esophagus are rare and most commonly seen in children with immune suppression resulting from malignancy, chronic metabolic or infectious disease, or immunosuppressive drug therapy.

METHODS

An 18-month-old girl on inhaled corticosteroid for bronchial asthma presented with coffee-ground emesis and melena. Upper endoscopy revealed yellow-white plaques scattered over the mucosa of the distal esophagus. Biopsy results showed chronic esophagitis with features of reflux disease. Gram staining of esophageal brushing showed pseudohyphae, and the culture was positive for candida species.

RESULTS

The patient was treated with omeprazole 2 mg/kg per day and fluconazole 6 mg/kg per day for three weeks. Immunological workup was normal and she was negative for human immunodeficiency virus. Post treatment endoscopy showed normal appearance of esophageal mucosa and normal histology. At 12 months after treatment, the child remained asymptomatic and continued to thrive.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that this child developed esophageal candidiasis secondary to long-term use of inhaled corticosteroid associated with immune suppression on a background of reflux esophagitis. Anti-acid and antifungal therapies are effective in the treatment.

Gastrointestinal complications of oncologic therapy

Gastrointestinal complications are common in patients undergoing various forms of cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and molecular-targeted therapies. Many of these complications are life-threatening and require prompt diagnosis and treatment. Complications of oncologic therapy can occur in the esophagus (esophagitis, strictures, bacterial, viral and fungal infections), upper gastrointestinal tract (mucositis, bleeding, nausea and vomiting), colon (diarrhea, graft-versus-host disease, colitis and constipation), liver (drug hepatotoxicity and graft-versus-host disease), and pancreas (pancreatitis). Treatment of the different gastrointestinal complications should be tailored to the individual patient and based on the underlying pathophysiology of the complication.

Seronegative Herpes simplex Associated Esophagogastric Ulcer after Liver Transplantation

Herpes simplex infection is characterized by acute or subacute infection, often followed by a chronic carrier state. Consecutive recurrences may flare up if immunocompromise occurs. Herpes simplex associated esophagitis or duodenal ulcer have been reported in immunocompromised patients due to neoplasm, HIV/AIDS or therapeutically induced immune deficiency. Here we report the case of an HSV-DNA seronegative patient who developed grade III dysphagia 13 days after allogeneic liver transplantation. Endoscopy revealed an esophageal-gastric ulcer, and biopsy histopathology showed a distinct fibroplastic and capillary ulcer pattern highly suspicious for viral infection. Immunohistochemistry staining revealed a distinct nuclear positive anti-HSV reaction. Antiviral therapy with acyclovir and high-dose PPI led to a complete revision of clinical symptoms within 48 h. Repeat control endoscopy after 7 days showed complete healing of the former ulcer site at the gastroesophageal junction. Although the incidence of post-transplantation Herpes simplex induced gastroesophageal disease is low, the viral HSV ulcer may be included into a differential diagnosis if dysphagia occurs after transplantation even if HSV-DNA PCR is negative.

Surgical Complications of Childhood Tumors

Most childhood tumors will first present to a physician; some tumors will present in an atypical manner and may mimic a surgical condition. The diagnosis may be missed if the surgeon is not aware of the possibility of cancer. A very great number of rare presentations of childhood cancer have been described in the literature. It is important that the surgeon who is not experienced in the management of childhood cancer is aware that an apparently benign condition could be a manifestation of an underlying malignancy [71, 83] (Table 22.1).

A rare cause of dysphagia: Herpes simplex esophagitis

Herpes simplex esophagitis (HSE) is well documented in immunosuppressed patients. However, it is rare in the immunocompetent host. We present a case of HSE in a 21 year-old healthy lady who was admitted to our unit with dysphagia, odynophagia and chest pain. Clinical examination revealed mild epigastric tenderness and admission bloods including full blood picture, electrolytes and inflammatory markers were normal. She underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) which revealed severe exudative, well-circumscribed ulcerations in her distal esophagus. Biopsies confirmed severe esophagitis with acute ulceration and subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1. Subsequent assessment failed to identify an immune disorder. HSE should be suspected when faced with characteristic endoscopic findings, even if the patient is immunocompetent. When the diagnosis of HSE is confirmed, an immune deficiency should be sought.

Combined herpes viral and candidal esophagitis in a CAPD patient: case report and review of literature

Concomitant herpetic and candidal esophagitis is a very rare disease that had not been reported in uremic patients. A 57-year-old woman receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) therapy for 3 years was admitted due to CAPD-related peritonitis. Endoscopic examination was performed due to severe epigastralgia and upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and combined herpetic and candidal esophagitis was diagnosed. Intravenous acyclovir and fluconazole were prescribed and symptoms improved. The patient subsequently died due to progressive sepsis and respiratory failure. This is the first report of a dual infectious esophagitis in a uremic patient. Since infectious esophagitis may cause severe complications, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are important.

Herpes simplex esophagitis in the immunocompetent host

We report here a case of herpes esophagitis with Mallory-Weiss syndrome in an immunocompetent host. A 26-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of common cold symptoms and eruptions on the body. On day 2 after hospitalization, the patient showed high-grade fever, odynophagia and hematemesis. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination showed multiple ulcerations throughout the mid- and distal esophagus. Bleeding from a Mallory-Weiss tear was also seen. Follow-up endoscopic examinations showed whitish exudates on day 5. Histological examination of biopsy specimens showed Cowdry type A intranuclear inclusion bodies in epithelial cells. Positive staining of a specific antibody against herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) was seen in the nuclei of esophageal epithelial cells. Primary HSV-1 infection was suspected because ELISA titers of serum IgM antibody against HSV-1 were high and titers of serum IgG antibody against HSV-1 increased from an almost cut-off ratio. A diagnosis of herpes esophagitis in an immunocompetent host was made. Our case is the first report of herpes esophagitis with Mallory-Weiss syndrome in the immunocompetent host. It is important to remind herpes esophagitis in cases of severe odynophagia even in immunocompetent hosts.

Diagnosis and management of infectious esophagitis associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Esophageal disease is a common complication and cause of morbidity in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Opportunistic infections are the leading cause of esophageal complaints and may be a predictor of poor long-term prognosis, presumably as a reflection of severe underlying HIV immunodeficiency. The esophagus may be the site of the first acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining opportunistic illness in a large number of patients. Barium esophagography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are diagnostic modalities, commonly used to evaluate esophageal complaints in patients with AIDS. Treatment for most etiologies of esophagitis generally has a high degree of success, with a resultant improvement in quality of life. In addition to optimizing antiretroviral therapy, a thorough diagnostic assessment of every HIV-infected patient with esophageal complaints is warranted, followed by timely and appropriate treatment.

Oral candidiasis in hematopoietic cell transplantation patients: an outcome-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

Despite aggressive antifungal prophylaxis, the increased risk for systemic fungal infection in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) continues to be a significant concern because Candida infection can cause morbidity and mortality in these patients. The objectives of this study were to examine the relationship of oral colonization by Candida species to systemic infection, mortality, and the impact of antifungal treatment on a population of recipients of HCT.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation were evaluated. Oral examinations and cultures for Candida were completed before transplantation and on a weekly basis until discharge. The oral complications were assessed, and the level of mucositis was scored by using the National Cancer Institute grade. Systemic antifungal prophylaxis was provided to all patients. Chlorhexidine oral rinses were also routinely provided.

RESULTS

Colonization by Candida species was identified in 31% of patients. Fifty-six percent of patients with colonization had clinical evidence of oral candidiasis. Significantly decreased Candida colonization was seen in patients using chlorhexidine alone compared with those using chlorhexidine and nystatin together (P <.046). Twenty-five patients died in the immediate posttransplantation period, 17 of whom were Candida-positive. The length of hospital stay ranged from 15 to 153 days; increased stay was also associated with Candida colonization (P =.04). Seventy-four percent of all patients developed ulcerative mucositis. More severe mucositis was seen in patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy. There was no significant difference between Candida colonization and the presence or severity of mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite systemic and topical antifungal prophylaxis, oropharyngeal colonization by Candida species was common in patients who had received HCT. Candidiasis was commonly present in those who did not survive the early transplant period. Of the 25 patients who died early after the transplantation, 92% had ulcerative mucositis in comparison with 70% of those who survived, reflecting the association of oral mucositis with the toxicity of HCT. There was a significant relationship among allogeneic and autologous HCT, length of stay, and colonization of Candida. In patients undergoing systemic antifungal prophylaxis, chlorhexidine rinse was statistically more effective in reducing colonization by Candida than chlorhexidine and nystatin combined (P =.046).

Infectious Esophagitis

Infectious esophagitis can have significant implications in an impaired host. Described most commonly in immunocompromised patients, infectious esophagitis can also occasionally be discovered in immunocompetent individuals in several unique clinical settings. Evaluation of the typical presenting complaints, such as dysphagia or odynophagia, are especially important in immunocompetent patients, and therapy should be directed at the appropriate predisposing condition and resultant infectious agent. In immunocompromised patients, however, clinical experience supports the use of empiric therapy in patients without concomitant systemic complaints. Especially in AIDS patients or those with lymphoma or leukemia, the initial approach to infectious esophagitis complaints (ie, dysphagia or odynophagia) is to begin an empiric trial of oral systemic fluconazole for presumed candidal esophagitis. If the individual remains symptomatic after 3 to 7 days or has any associated systemic complaints or concerning clinical findings (eg, hematemesis), then upper endoscopy with biopsies is indicated. If an etiologic agent other than Candida is defined by histologic, immunohistochemical, or culture methods, then appropriate therapy can be initiated. There are many important and pathologic agents implicated in infectious esophagitis. Thus, directed therapy needs to be administered appropriately and in a timely fashion to avoid poor short-term problems or long-term sequelae.

Infectious necrotizing esophagitis: outcome after medical and surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

Immunodeficiency predisposes to invasive esophageal infections. The treatment of perforation, respiratory fistula, and necrosis due to transmural esophageal infection is guided by anecdote. We wish to determine treatment and outcome of local complications of necrotizing esophagitis.

METHODS

We report our experience over a 7-year period and review published reports since 1976. We treated 4 patients and found 21 reported patients with perforation (11/25), fistula (8/25), and necrosis (6/25) at a mean age of 35 years. Twenty-one patients were immunodeficient (84%) due to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in 8, acute leukemia in 6, renal transplant in 3, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and corticosteroids in 1 each. Pathogenic organisms were fungal in 15 cases, viral in 7, and bacterial in 7.

RESULTS

Treatment consisted of antibiotic therapy in 13 patients and surgical intervention combined with antibiotic therapy in 12: esophagectomy in 6, esophageal stenting and drainage in 2, drainage alone in 2, and salivary diversion in 2. Overall mortality was 48% (12/25). Mortality without surgical intervention was 90% (9/10) and with surgical intervention 27% (3/11). One of 6 patients undergoing esophagectomy (17%) died. The difference in mortality was due to sepsis, which was the cause of death in 8 patients treated with medical intervention and only 1 treated with surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Local complications of necrotizing esophagitis have a high mortality due to sepsis. Surgical intervention, in particular esophagectomy, controls sepsis in published case reports and should be considered in selected patients. Further study is required to determine the true prevalence of these complications and the outcome of intervention.

Pseudomembranous esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Little is known of pseudomembranous esophagitis, a condition of striking endoscopic appearance. Presented here is a description of its nature and outcome.

METHOD

Information on all patients with upper GI disease seen in our unit are held in a computerized database that includes presentation, diagnosis (including pseudomembranous esophagitis), treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (mean age 70 years) with pseudomembranous esophagitis were seen over 15 years; 42 were in-patients with various illnesses. At endoscopy, a thin, concentric membrane and/or thick slough covered the distal half and occasionally the entire esophagus. This layer, yellow or blackened, could be peeled away to reveal underlying friable esophageal submucosa. The membrane was composed of fibrinous exudate and inflammatory cells; there was no basement membrane, hence the term pseudomembrane. Patients were treated with histamine H2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for about 3 months and followed by endoscopy or clinical observation. All became asymptomatic; the pseudomembrane had disappeared in 32 who underwent follow-up endoscopy. It recurred in 3 of 38 being followed (mean 3.2 years), again associated with another illness requiring hospitalization. The long-term outcome was poor, determined by age and general condition and independent of pseudomembranous esophagitis. Seven patients died within 3 months and 17 during follow-up (mean 42 months, range 5-140 months).

CONCLUSION

Pseudomembranous esophagitis is an unusual condition of unknown cause, probably under-reported and associated with systemic illness. It heals rapidly and recurrence is uncommon.

Exfoliative esophagitis early after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Two patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) suffered from hematemesis due to exfoliative esophagitis early after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). The chemotherapy regimens used for these 2 patients were the same and consisted of high-dose ranimustine, carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (MCVC regimen), which have been widely used in autologous PBSCT for NHL in Japan. Esophageal bleeding in both patients was stopped by conservative treatment without any special endoscopic manipulations. Gastrointestinal bleeding after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is usually caused by viral infections, graft-versus-host disease, or conditioning chemo-radiotherapy. Although severe esophagitis is common in patients receiving stem cell transplantation, the exfoliative form detected by endoscopic examination has not been reported. We conclude that high-dose chemotherapy and frequent vomiting during treatment are risk factors for lower-esophageal bleeding in these cases.

Does gastroenterology consultation change management of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Gastrointestinal complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) are common, but it is unknown how often gastroenterology consultation (GEC) early post BMT leads to specific changes in patient management. We aimed to determine the reason(s) for GEC, the diagnoses found through GEC, whether the advice or intervention led to change(s) in management and if intervention led to any adverse outcome within the first 100 days post HSCT. We undertook a retrospective review of all patients at least 18 years old (n = 197) who underwent HSCT between November 1990 and April 1998. Of these, 79 patients had 92 consultations for a total of 163 separate GE problems within the first 100 days post HSCT. Data were obtained through chart review. It was determined whether the intervention or advice given by the consultant led to actual changes in patient management or outcome. We found that the characteristics more likely to be associated with GEC included female patient vs male (P = 0.03), allogeneic vs autologous transplants (P < 0.001), hematologic vs solid malignancies (P = 0.006), and leukemias vs lymphomas (P = 0.013). Overall, a definitive diagnosis for an identified complaint was made in 71% (range 25-87%). A change in management was effected in 54% of cases (range 0-59%). Endoscopy led to perforation and subsequent death in two patients (1.8%). Gastrointestinal disease was a direct cause of death in 2.5% of all patients. In conclusion, a definite diagnosis was reached in 71% of gastrointestinal problems and management was effected in 54% of cases. Since endoscopy was associated with a mortality of 1.8%, minimizing its use for the cases in which no impact is made, should be considered.

Gastrointestinal infections in the immunocompromised host

Gastrointestinal disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the immunocompromised patient. This article focuses on the infectious gastrointestinal complications associated with the treatment of malignant disease and with solid organ transplantation but not HIV. Gastrointestinal defenses and the various mechanisms by which they are impaired are reviewed. The major pathogens and malignancies of this patient population and an approach to their diagnosis, treatment, and prevention are discussed.

Esophageal disorders in the elderly

As the number of elderly in the population increases, decompensation of swallowing and airway protective mechanisms can create an increased health care burden. This article outlines the effect of aging on deglutitive function and esophageal and aerodigestive reflexes. Specific disorders in the elderly are discussed.

Herpes esophagitis: clinical syndrome, endoscopic appearance, and diagnosis in 23 patients

The unexpected diagnosis of herpetic esophagitis in a patient with nausea led us to review our experience with this disease. Review of our records from 1979 to 1989 produced 23 cases proven by endoscopic culture or microscopic examination (Cowdry-type A inclusions), the largest such series reported to date. Twenty-two of the 23 patients were immunocompromised. Odynophagia and chest pain were each present in half of the cases, but 26% of patients had neither. Gastrointestinal bleeding was attributable to herpetic esophagitis in 30%. Thirty percent of patients had disseminated herpes simplex infection and 70% had simultaneous infections with other organisms. Endoscopic findings included nonspecific inflammation, discrete ulcers, coalescent ulcers, and pseudomembranous esophagitis. Herpes virus was not suspected endoscopically as the cause of esophagitis in 30% of cases. Culture was slightly more sensitive than microscopic examination for diagnosis (89% vs. 76%), but both methods should be employed in any immunocompromised patient with esophagitis.

Severe gastrointestinal bleeding after hematopoietic cell transplantation, 1987-1997: incidence, causes, and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Severe GI bleeding after hematopoietic cell transplantation is commonly due to lesions that are unusual in nontransplant patients. The frequency of GI bleeding appears to have decreased over the last decade, but the reasons have not been readily apparent. We sought to determine the incidence of severe bleeding during two time periods, to describe the causes and outcomes of bleeding, and to analyze the reasons behind an apparent decline in severe bleeding over the decade covered.

METHODS

During 1986-1987 and 1996-1997, we followed all patients with and without severe bleeding at our institution, a marrow transplant center.

RESULTS

Over this decade, the incidence of severe bleeding declined from 50/467 (10.7%) to 15/635 (2.4%) (p < 0.0001). Overall mortality from intestinal bleeding declined from 3.6% to 0.9% (p = 0.002), but mortality in those with bleeding remained high (34% vs 40%). The onset (day 42 vs 47) and platelet counts (35,994 vs 37,600/microl) were similar, but the sites and causes of bleeding were different. During 1986-1987, 27/50 patients bled from multiple GI sites, viral and fungal ulcers, or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Over the decade, bleeding from GVHD had decreased 80% (p < 0.0001), and bleeding from viral (p < 0.0001) and fungal (p = 0.023) ulcers almost disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of severe GI bleeding has declined significantly over the last decade because of prevention of viral and fungal infections and severe acute GVHD. However, severe bleeding after transplant remains a highly morbid event, particularly among patients with GVHD.