Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing?

Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Rate pressure product (RPP) is an objective hemodynamic index that is closely related to the prognosis of cardia-cerebrovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between RPP and GIB in ICH patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from ICH patients admitted to the neurosurgery department of Nanchang University affiliated with Ganzhou Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. The patients were divided into a GIB group and a non-GIB group according to whether they had GIB. Propensity score matching was used to match between the two groups. Univariate analysis was used to select factors affecting GIB, and multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to analyze the independent factors associated with GIB.

RESULTS

There were 1232 patients included in the study, including 182 in the GIB group and 1050 in the non-GIB group, and 182 pairs of patients were successfully matched through propensity score matching. The univariate analysis showed that high RPP, low Glasgow coma score (GCS), fibrinogen, D-dimer and PPIs were factors associated with GIB. Multivariate conditional logistic regression showed that high RPP, low GCS and urokinase were independent risk factors for GIB, and PPIs was a protective factor for GIB.

CONCLUSIONS

High RPP, low GCS and urokinase were independent risk factors for GIB, and PPIs was a protective factor for GIB. Patients with a high risk of developing GIB should be monitored closely. Nevertheless, multicenter prospective studies with more patients are needed to further validate the results.

Proton pump inhibitors and gastroprotection in patients treated with antithrombotic drugs: A cardiologic point of view

Aspirin, other antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulant drugs are used across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. A concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed in these patients, as gastrointestinal complications are relatively frequent. On the other hand, a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested in patients treated with PPIs; in particular, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection of clopidogrel, due to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions through hepatic metabolism. Previously, the concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole or esomeprazole has been discouraged. In contrast, it remains less known whether PPI use may affect the clinical efficacy of ticagrelor and prasugrel, new P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Current guidelines recommend PPI use in combination with antiplatelet treatment in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, PPIs could be recommended, even if their usefulness deserves further data. H. pylori infection should always be investigated and treated in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication) treated with antithrombotic drugs. The present review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread combined use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs, discussing consequent clinical implications.

Unveiling the Mechanism of Principal Drugs of Lianpu Drink on Chronic Gastritis by Network Pharmacology

Lianpu drink (LPD) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula for the treatment of chronic gastritis (CG), and its clinical effects have been effectively verified. However, due to the complexity of the chemical composition of TCM formulas, its mechanism of action has not yet been clearly explained. Many studies have shown that the principal drugs in the TCM formula play a major therapeutic role. Therefore, in this study, the principal drugs Coptidis Rhizoma (CR) and Magnolia officinalis Rehd. et Wils. (MOR) in LPD were used as the main research objects to predict the mechanism of LPD on CG. We contrasted a “compounds-targets-diseases” network and screened the putative targets of CR and MOR in LPD related to CG, respectively. Furthermore, common targets of CR and MOR related to CG were selected as candidate targets. In this study, the specific target proteins of CR, MOR, and CG were combined by protein-protein interaction (PPI) to construct a pharmacological network of “components-targets-diseases.” In addition, we investigated the effects of CR and MOR on the TNF signaling pathway, which mediated the remission of CG. This study preliminarily revealed that CR and MOR play a key role in the treatment of CG. Animal experiments also showed that CR and MOR could significantly improve CG by inhibiting MKK6/p38 and RIP/p38 pathway.

Gastroprotection in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy: a position paper of National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO)

Aspirin and P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed. However, potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested for PPIs, and, in recent years, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Indeed, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction through hepatic CYP2C19 between PPIs and clopidogrel, which could translate into clinical inefficacy, leading to higher rates of cardiovascular events. The FDA and the EMA sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. In addition, whether the use of PPIs may affect the clinical efficacy of the new P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, remains less known. According to current guidelines, PPIs in combination with antiplatelet treatment are recommended in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Like vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), DOACs can determine gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggest that high-dose dabigatran (150 mg bid), rivaroxaban and high-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) are associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding as compared with apixaban and warfarin. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with GI risk factor, PPI could be recommended, even if usefulness of PPIs in these patients deserves further data. Helicobacter pylori should always be searched, and treated, in patients with history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication). Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition or anticoagulant effect potentially carries a considerable clinical impact. The present joint statement by ANMCO and AIGO summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses consequent clinical implications.

Comparative analysis of the effect of IV administered acid suppressants on gastric pH in dogs

Background

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration and bleeding in critically ill dogs can cause severe anemia and increase morbidity. Acid suppressants using proton pump inhibitors or histamine‐2 receptor blockers administered IV is commonly recommended.

Hypothesis/Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of IV administered esomeprazole, pantoprazole, and famotidine constant rate infusion (CRI) on increasing the intragastric pH of dogs. We hypothesized that esomeprazole and famotidine CRI would provide superior acid suppression compared to pantoprazole and reach pH goals for the treatment of GI bleeding.

Animals

Nine healthy research Beagles.

Methods

Randomized, 3‐way crossover. Dogs received pantoprazole or esomeprazole at 1 mg/kg IV q12h and famotidine with a loading dose of 1 mg/kg followed by 8 mg/kg IV CRI daily for 3 consecutive days. The intragastric pH was recorded at baseline and for 72 hours of treatment. The mean pH and the mean percentage time (MPT) the intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 were compared among and within treatment groups.

Results

Significant increases in mean pH (P < 0.0001), MPT ≥3 (P < 0.001), and MPT ≥4 (P = 0.0006) were noted over time with all 3 treatments. The time effect did not differ by treatment for mean pH, MPT ≥3, and MPT ≥4 (P = .29, .56, and .37, respectively); however, only esomeprazole and famotidine CRI achieved the goals established for the treatment of gastroduodenal ulceration in people.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Famotidine CRI and esomeprazole might be superior acid suppressants compared to standard doses of pantoprazole for the first 72 hours of treatment.

Evaluation of the effect of a famotidine continuous rate infusion on intragastric pH in healthy dogs

Background

Famotidine is sometimes administered as a continuous rate infusion (CRI) to treat gastrointestinal ulceration in critically ill dogs. However, clinical studies have not evaluated the efficacy of a famotidine CRI in dogs.

Hypothesis/Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of famotidine at raising intragastric pH when it is administered as a CRI in dogs. We hypothesized that CRI treatment with famotidine would meet clinical goals for raising intragastric pH ≥3 and 4.

Animals

Nine healthy Beagle dogs.

Methods

Randomized 2‐way crossover. All dogs received 1.0 mg/kg IV q12h famotidine or CRI famotidine at 1.0 mg/kg IV loading dose and 8.0 mg/kg/d for 3 consecutive days. Beginning on day 0 of treatment, intragastric pH monitoring was used to continuously record intragastric pH. Mean percentage times (MPTs) for which intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 were compared between groups using analysis of variance.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference (P < .05) in MPT ≥3 and ≥4 between the CRI and IV q12h groups on all treatment days. On days 1, 2, and 3, the MPTs ± SD for which pH was ≥3 were 92.1 ± 8.5, 96.3 ± 6.2, and 90.0 ± 15.7 for the CRI treatment group and 49.3 ± 27.3, 42.2 ± 19.6, and 45.8 ± 10.1, respectively, for the twice‐daily group.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

These results suggest that a famotidine CRI, but not standard doses of famotidine, achieves the clinical goals established in people to promote healing of gastric tissue injury and offers an alternative to intravenous treatment with proton pump inhibitors in dogs.

Influence of oral magnesium-containing supplement and antacid administration on hypomagnesemia induced by panitumumab

PURPOSE

Hypomagnesemia is a common side effect of panitumumab. The effect of magnesium-containing supplement as a laxative and concomitant antacid (proton pump inhibitor and histamine H₂ antagonist) administration on panitumumab-induced hypomagnesemia was retrospectively investigated.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who received panitumumab were included in this study. Serum magnesium levels were extracted from the electronic medical records of 1753 administrations in 221 patients who received panitumumab. Serum magnesium levels in patients with or without oral magnesium-containing supplement and antacid treatment were compared using analysis of covariance as the number of panitumumab administration up to 16 times for covariates.

RESULTS

The mean serum magnesium levels were significantly decreased with increasing number of panitumumab administrations (2.13 mg/dL at 1st vs. 1.55 mg/dL at 16th, p < 0.001). The use of oral magnesium-containing supplement significantly inhibited the decline in mean serum magnesium level (1.98 mg/dL vs. 1.78 mg/dL, p < 0.001). However, antacid use in patients receiving oral magnesium-containing supplement significantly decreased the effectiveness of the magnesium supplement on serum magnesium level (2.02 mg/dL vs. 1.93 mg/dL, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of oral magnesium-containing supplement might function as magnesium supplement based on the finding that use of oral magnesium-containing supplement during panitumumab administration decreased hypomagnesemia. However, combination of antacid decreased the supplemental effect of oral magnesium on hypomagnesemia. These results suggest the possibility that use of antacids during anti-EGFR antibody administration may promote hypomagnesemia.

Lack of incremental effect of histamine receptor antagonists over proton pump inhibitors on the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Long-term acid suppression reduces the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Given recent reports about the harmful effects of using chronic proton pump inhibitors (PPI) there is renewed interest in alternative methods of acid suppression. Hence, we studied the effect of H2 receptor antagonists (H₂ RA) on the risk of progression to neoplasia in our BE cohort.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients in our BE registry from 2002 to 2015. Patients' characteristics, endoscopic findings, such as the length of BE, hiatal hernia size and histological findings and patients' use of medications such as PPI, aspirin, H₂ RA, metformin and antihyperlipidemic agents were studied.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 1466 patients with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years. The patients had a predominance of male sex (76.7% [1118/1457]) and Caucasian race (96.6% [1209/1252]). After excluding prevalent high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC, 1025 patients had a median follow up of 43.6 months during which 57 patients progressed to HGD or EAC. PPI use (56% in progressors vs 69% in non-progressors; P = 0.007) but not H₂ RA use (12% progressors vs 19% in non-progressors P = 0.162) was associated with lower risk of neoplastic progression. On multivariate analysis, there was no synergistic effect of addition of H₂ RA to PPI on risk of neoplastic progression to HGD or EAC (relative risk 0.33; confidence intervals 0.05-2.29, P = 0.262).

CONCLUSION

H₂ RA do not seem to have a chemopreventive role in patients with BE.

Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity Associated With Long-Term Aspirin Therapy: Consequences and Prevention

Antiplatelet therapy represents a fundamental part of preventive management for patients who are at risk of a secondary cardiovascular disease (CVD) event. In most cases, the antiplatelet regimen is based on low-dose aspirin, a drug that is highly effective in reducing the incidence of CVD events, but is associated with a substantial risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The dyspeptic symptoms, which can result from aspirin administration, and which may occur with or without associated ulceration and bleeding, may lead patients to discontinue therapy, thus increasing their CVD risk. For patients in whom aspirin is indicated and who are deemed to be at increased risk of upper GI events, concomitant therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is currently recommended. These agents are highly effective in reducing the upper GI lesions associated with aspirin therapy and have been associated with increased aspirin adherence. However, widespread under-prescribing of PPIs and potential noncompliance with their use means that substantial numbers of patients are at unnecessary risk of upper GI toxicity and-if aspirin therapy is discontinued-CVD events. Provision of aspirin and an immediate-release PPI as a coordinated-delivery combination tablet has been shown to both reduce the risk of gastric ulcer formation and improve patient compliance. This strategy, which may ultimately reduce the incidence of CVD outcomes because of the associated reduction in GI symptoms and the potential for greater patient adherence to aspirin, warrants further investigation under both randomized controlled conditions (explanatory trials), and in real-life settings (pragmatic trials).

Repeated Famotidine Administration Results in a Diminished Effect on Intragastric pH in Dogs

Background

Famotidine is an acid suppressant commonly administered to dogs. Prolonged famotidine use in people results in decreased efficacy, but the effect in dogs is unknown.

Hypothesis/Objectives

To compare the effect of repeated oral administration of famotidine or placebo on intragastric pH and serum gastrin in dogs. We hypothesized that famotidine would have a diminished effect on intragastric pH on day 13 compared to day 1.

Animals

Six healthy adult colony Beagles.

Methods

Randomized, 2‐factor repeated‐measures crossover design. All dogs received oral placebo or 1.0 mg/kg famotidine q12h for 14 consecutive days. Intragastric pH monitoring was used to continuously record intragastric pH on treatment days 1–2 and 12–13. Mean pH as well as mean percentage time (MPT) that intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 were compared between and within groups by analysis of variance. Serum gastrin was measured on days 0, 3, and 12 for each treatment.

Results

Continued administration of famotidine resulted in a significant decrease in mean pH, MPT ≥3, and MPT ≥4 (P < .0001) on day 12 and 13. This resulted in a mean decrease in pH by 1.63 on days 12 and 13 compared to days 1 and 2. Furthermore, a mean decrease of MPT ≥3 and MPT ≥4 by 33 and 45% was observed for the same time period, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Continued administration of famotidine results in a diminished effect on intragastric pH in dogs. Caution is advised when recommending long‐term, daily oral administration of famotidine to dogs.

Current Status of Gastric Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

Proton pump inhibitors represent an important advance in the treatment of acid-peptic disease. Omeprazole, the prototype of the drug class, produces a profound and sustained degree of gastric acid suppression. Recent studies confirm earlier reports that omeprazole 20 mg/d is generally more effective than standard histamine2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) dosage regimens in treating duodenal ulcer (DU), gastric ulcer (GU), and erosive esophagitis. Omeprazole tends to accelerate DU and GU healing, especially during the first 2 weeks of treatment, and also accelerates mucosal healing in patients with all grades of esophagitis. Omeprazole is the drug of choice for treating patients with large or refractory ulcers, severe or refractory erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Maintenance therapy with omeprazole seems to reduce ulcer recurrence and esophagitis, but optimal treatment regimens must be established. Dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin shows encouraging results in eradicating Helicobacter pylori, reducing duodenal ulcer recurrence rates, and altering the natural history of peptic ulcer disease. Further studies are required to determine the efficacy of omeprazole in preventing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers and stress-related mucosal bleeding, and in treating upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Omeprazole is well-tolerated in the majority of patients receiving either short-term or long-term treatment. The type and frequency of adverse effects are similar to those reported with the H2RAs. There is no evidence to support genotoxicity or hypergastrinemia-induced enterochromaffin-like cell carcinoid of the stomach in patients receiving omeprazole treatment for more than 5 years. Omeprazole interacts selectively with hepatic P-450 and may potentially interact with phenytoin, warfarin, or diazepam. Pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that treatment with omeprazole provides a significant cost-savings over the H2RAs in patients with moderate to severe erosive esophagitis and possibly in patients with DU. Lansoprazole, a newly developed proton pump inhibitor, seems to offer no clear advantage over omeprazole.

Evidence-based treatment of frequent heartburn: the benefits and limitations of over-the-counter medications

PURPOSE

This review summarizes the pharmacological effects of over-the-counter (OTC) heartburn drugs, and the implications for treating frequent heartburn.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and SCOPUS were searched across all years to identify well-controlled, randomized clinical studies that assessed mechanism of action and efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Antacids can transiently neutralize acid in the esophagus, but do not significantly affect gastric pH or prevent subsequent heartburn episodes. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs) rapidly develop tolerance with repeat dosing, and exhibit an analgesic effect that may provide heartburn relief while leaving the esophagus exposed to acid. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide a sustained inhibition of gastric acid production, and are superior to antacids and H2 RAs for control of gastric acid and treatment of frequent heartburn.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

When recommending therapies for frequent heartburn, it is of particular importance to understand the strengths and weaknesses of available OTC medications. Antacids and H2 RAs are not recommended for treatment of frequent heartburn, while OTC PPIs are both indicated for, and effective for, treatment of frequent heartburn. A PPI dose of 20 mg is optimal for empiric treatment of frequent heartburn, and consistent with the 2013 treatment guidelines established by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) for treatment with a minimum effective dose.

Gastrointestinal bleeding after intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 808 cases

BACKGROUND

This study examined the incidence and risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

The available medical records of patients with ICH admitted from June 2008 to December 2009 for any episode of GI bleeding, possible precipitating factors and administration of ulcer prophylaxis were reviewed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of GI bleeding was 26.7%, including 3 cases of severe GI bleeding (0.35%). Patients with GI bleeding had significantly longer hospital stay and higher in-hospital mortality compared with patients without GI bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, sepsis and ICH volume were independent predictors of GI bleeding. About 63.4% of patients with ICH received stress ulcer prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

GI bleeding occurred frequently after ICH, but severe events were rare. Age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, sepsis and ICH volume were independent predictors of GI bleeding occurring after ICH.

Meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for reducing aspiration risk during anaesthesia depending on the administration route and schedule

H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used for aspiration prophylaxis in patients receiving general anaesthesia. Many randomized trials have compared these agents but it remains unclear which drug type is more effective in reducing the number of patients at risk of complications. The study aimed to compare their efficacy for decreasing the number of patients at risk of acid aspiration during general anaesthesia. Major databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing PPI and H2RA were selected. Sub-analyses were performed considering the dose, the dosing schedule, and the route of administration. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main analysis showed a non-significant trend for H2RA being more effective than PPI. Only when both drugs were administered per os, as a single dose and immediately before surgery, was H2RA significantly more effective than PPI. By contrast, the effect of PPI and H2RA was similar when they were administered in two doses (the night before and on the morning of surgery) or when the drugs were given intravenously. A single H2RA dose before surgery is highly effective in reducing the number of patients at risk of acid aspiration. PPI administered in two oral doses or in a single intravenous infusion seems to be as effective as H2RA.

Rebound acid hypersecretion after withdrawal of gastric acid suppressing drugs: new evidence of similitude

BACKGROUND

Homeopathy is based on the principle of similitude (similia similibus curentur) using medicines that cause effects similar to the symptoms of disease in order to stimulate the reaction of the organism. Such vital, homeostatic or paradoxical reaction of the organism is closely related to rebound effect of drugs.

METHOD

Review of the literature concerning the rebound effects of drugs used to suppress gastric acidity, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

RESULTS

The mechanism of action of these effects is discussed. Rebound in terms of clinical symptoms and physiological effects occur in about 40% of people taking PPIs, their timing depends on the half-life of the drug and the adaptation period of the physiological mechanisms involved. The wide use of PPIs may be linked to the rising incidence of carcinoid tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support Hahnemann's concept of secondary action of drugs. We are developing a homeopathic materia medica and repertory of modern drugs on the basis of reported rebound effects.

Pharmacologic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

There are many clinical outcome measures for evaluation of the effectiveness of a pharmacologic agent in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). As a preemptive treatment, it should reduce the need for emergency endoscopy and endoscopic intervention, facilitate the efficient identification of the bleeding source and, hence, shorten procedure time and reduce the risk of procedure-related complications. As an effective adjunctive therapy after endoscopic hemostasis, it should reduce the incidence of recurrent bleeding and the need to repeat endoscopic hemostasis. This article provides an overview of different pharmacologic agents that have been used in the management of UGIB.

Deep Vein Thrombosis and Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and stress gastric ulcers can be serious complications in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. This review discusses the risk factors associated with the development of DVT and stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD), evaluates the available literature on current options for DVT and stress ulcer prophylaxis, and examines the associated adverse effects and optimal duration of therapy.

The pharmacological therapy of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

The modern management of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding includes, in selected patients, the performance of timely multimodal endoscopic hemostasis followed by profound acid suppression. This article discusses the available data on the use of antisecretory regimens in the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, which are a major cause of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and briefly addresses other medications used in this acute setting. The most important clinically relevant data are presented, favoring fully published articles.

Reversal of the tolerance phenomenon by the intermittent administration of a histamine H2-receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The attenuated antisecretory activity of H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) during continuous administration is referred to as the tolerance phenomenon. A previous study indicated that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection prevents the occurrence of tolerance to H2RA. In the present study, we investigated whether intermittent (every other day) administration prevents the tolerance phenomenon in H. pylori-negative patients.

METHODS

Ten H. pylori-negative, healthy volunteers were included in the study. All of the patients underwent two courses of H2RA (lafutidine) administration: 21-day continuous administration (every day), followed by 21-day intermittent administration (every other day), with at least a 21-day lafutidine-free period between the first and second courses. All of the patients were examined by ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring five times: before medication, and on days 1 and 21 of the first (continuous) and second (intermittent) courses of lafutidine (10 mg b.d.) in a crossover fashion.

RESULTS

The continuous administration of lafutidine had a significantly attenuated, acid-suppressing effect in H. pylori-negative patients, and showed evidence of the tolerance phenomenon. However, the tolerance phenomenon was not observed through intermittent administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated that in H. pylori-negative patients, tolerance to H2RA, induced by continuous lafutidine administration, was reversed by subsequent intermittent administration.

WITHDRAWN: Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding yield conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of PPIs in acute bleeding from PU using evidence from RCTs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2004), EMBASE (1980 to November 2004), proceedings of major meetings to November 2004, and reference lists of articles. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of PPI treatment (oral or intravenous) compared with placebo or H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) in acute bleeding from PU.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently, assessed study validity, summarised studies and undertook meta-analysis. The influence of study characteristics on the outcomes was examined by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs comprising 4373 participants in total were included. Statistical heterogeneity was found among trials for rebleeding (P = 0.04), but not for all-cause mortality (P = 0.24) or surgery (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality rates between PPI and control treatment; pooled rates were 3.9% on PPI versus 3.8% on control (odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.40). PPIs significantly reduced rebleeding compared to control; pooled rates were 10.6% with PPI versus 17.3% with control treatment (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.65). PPI treatment significantly reduced surgery compared with control; pooled rates were 6.1% on PPI versus 9.3% on control (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78). There was no evidence to suggest that results on mortality and rebleeding were dependent on study quality, route of PPI administration, type of control treatment or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment. PPIs significantly reduced surgery compared with placebo but not when compared with H(2)RA. There was no evidence to suggest that study quality, route of PPI administration or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment influenced results on surgery. PPI treatment appeared more efficacious in studies conducted in Asia compared to studies conducted elsewhere. All-cause mortality was reduced only in Asian studies; reductions in rebleeding and surgery were quantitatively greater in Asian studies. Among patients with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessel, PPI treatment reduced mortality (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91), rebleeding and surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPI treatment in PU bleeding reduces rebleeding and surgery compared with placebo or H(2)RA, but there is no evidence of an overall effect on all-cause mortality.

Ranitidine is unable to maintain gastric pH levels above 4 in septic patients

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate whether ranitidine and pantoprazole are able to maintain gastric pH >or=4 in septic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty intensive care unit patients from a university teaching hospital with sepsis were included in this study. Ten patients received ranitidine (50 mg as an intermittent bolus 3 times a day) and 10 received pantoprazole (40 mg as an intermittent bolus twice a day). Gastric pH was measured continuously for 48 hours. Endoscopy of the upper digestive tract, gastric biopsy, and investigation for Helicobacter pylori were carried out before and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

pH values >or=4 were maintained for 46.27% +/- 38.21% and 81.57% +/- 19.65% of study time in the ranitidine and pantoprazole groups, respectively (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous ranitidine was unable to maintain gastric pH above 4 in septic patients. All cases in the ranitidine group in whom pH remained above 4 had gastric hypotrophy or atrophy. Pantoprazole successfully maintained pH levels above 4.

Gastric acid inhibition in the treatment of peptic ulcer hemorrhage

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic ulcer disease is a common clinical event, resulting in considerable patient morbidity and significant health care costs. Inhibiting gastric acid secretion is a key component in improving clinical outcomes, including reducing rebleeding, transfusion requirements, and surgery. Raising intragastric pH promotes clot stability and reduces the influences of gastric acid and pepsin. Patients with high-risk stigmata for ulcer bleeding (arterial bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessels, and adherent clots) benefit significantly from and should receive high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) after successful endoscopic hemostasis. For patients with low-risk stigmata (flat spots or clean ulcer base), oral PPI therapy alone is sufficient. For oozing bleeding (an intermediate risk finding), successful endoscopic hemostasis and oral PPI are recommended. Using intravenous PPIs before endoscopy appears to reduce the frequency of finding high-risk stigmata on later endoscopy, but has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes. High-dose oral PPIs may be as effective as intravenous infusion in achieving positive clinical outcomes, but this has not been documented by randomized studies and its cost-effectiveness is unclear.

How evidence-based are current guidelines for managing patients with peptic ulcer bleeding?

Current guidelines for managing ulcer bleeding state that patients with major stigmata should be managed by dual endoscopic therapy (injection with epinephrine plus a thermal or mechanical modality) followed by a high dose intravenous infusion of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This paper aims to review and critically evaluate evidence supporting the purported superiority of a continuous infusion over less intensive regimens of PPIs administration and the need for adding a second hemostatic endoscopic procedure to epinephrine injection. Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were performed. There is strong evidence for an incremental benefit of PPIs over H2-receptor antagonists or placebo for the outcome of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding following endoscopic hemostasis. However, the benefit of PPIs is unrelated to either the dosage (intensive vs standard regimen) or the route of administration (intravenous vs oral). There is significant heterogeneity among the 15 studies that compared epinephrine with epinephrine plus a second modality, which might preclude the validity of reported summary estimates. Studies without second look endoscopy plus re-treatment of re-bleeding lesions showed a significant benefit of adding a second endoscopic modality for hemostasis, while studies with second-look and re-treatment showed equal efficacy between endoscopic mono and dual therapy. Inconclusive experimental evidence supports the current recommendation of the use of dual endoscopic hemostatic means and infusion of high-dose PPIs as standard therapy for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. Presently, the combination of epinephrine monotherapy with standard doses of PPIs constitutes an appropriate treatment for the majority of patients.

A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers

Intravenous (IV) proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are potent gastric acid suppressing agents, and their use is popular in clinical practice. Both IV and oral PPIs have similarly short half-lives, and their effects on acid secretion are similar, thus their dosing and dosage intervals appear to be interchangeable. The possible exception is when sustained high pHs are required to promote clot stabilization in bleeding peptic ulcers. Continuous infusion appears to be the only form of administration that reliably achieves these high target pHs. IV PPI is indicated in the treatment of high-risk peptic ulcers, complicated gastroesophageal reflux, stress-induced ulcer prophylaxis, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and whenever it is impossible or impractical to give oral therapy. The widespread use of PPIs has been controversial. IV PPIs have been linked to the development of nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care setting and to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients. This review discusses the use of IV PPI in different clinical scenarios, its controversies, and issues of appropriate use.

Effects of esomeprazole premedication on gastric pH during laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

The use of CO2 for pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery provokes a decrement in the gastric pH. Since the incidence rate of PONV increases after laparoscopic surgery, the possibility of lung aspiration of gastric juice with a low pH during a postanesthetic emergence may increase and this could be fatal for the patient. We conducted this study to determine the effects of esomeprazole premedication on inhibiting the decrement of the gastric pH during laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

40 adult patients with no underlying diseases were chosen and 20 patients each were grouped as C (the control group) and E (the esomeprazole group). In both group, 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate was given intramuscularly 30 minutes prior to the surgery. In group E, esomeprazole was given orally 2 hours prior to the surgery. The pH, PaCO2, and PETCO2 were measured via pH probe, an ABGA and an capnogram at preinsufflation and 15, 30 and 60 minutes after the CO2 insufflation and right before CO2 exhaustion (predeflation).

RESULTS

Comparing the measurements of the gastric pH between group E and group C, all the results showed a significant increase in group E (P < 0.05). The difference of the PaCO2 and PETCO2 in the two groups was not significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the decrease in the gastric pH as the PaCO2 and PETCO2 increased in group C, the gastric pH in group E remained high until the end of the surgery despite the increase in the PaCO2 and PETCO2. Esomeprazole premedication seem to have an effect for inhibiting the gastric pH decrement regardless of the increase in the PaCO2 and PETCO2 during laparoscopic surgery.

Clinical trial: intravenous pantoprazole vs. ranitidine for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding: a multicentre, multinational, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Controlled pantoprazole data in peptic ulcer bleeding are few.

AIM

To compare intravenous (IV) pantoprazole with IV ranitidine for bleeding ulcers.

METHODS

After endoscopic haemostasis, 1256 patients were randomized to pantoprazole 80 mg+8 mg/h or ranitidine 50 mg+13 mg/h, both for 72 h. Patients underwent second-look endoscopy on day 3 or earlier, if clinically indicated. The primary endpoint was an overall outcome ordinal score: no rebleeding, rebleeding without/with subsequent haemostasis, surgery and mortality. The latter three events were also assessed separately and together.

RESULTS

There were no between-group differences in overall outcome scores (pantoprazole vs. ranitidine: S0: 91.2 vs. 89.3%, S1: 1.5 vs. 2.5%, S2: 5.4 vs. 5.7%, S3: 1.7 vs. 2.1%, S4: 0.19 vs. 0.38%, P = 0.083), 72-h clinically detected rebleeding (2.9% [95% CI 1.7, 4.6] vs. 3.2% [95% CI 2.0, 4.9]), surgery (1.9% [95% CI 1.0, 3.4] vs. 2.1% [95% CI 1.1, 3.5]) or day-3 mortality (0.2% [95% CI 0, 0.09] vs. 0.3% [95% CI 0, 1.1]). Pantoprazole significantly decreased cumulative frequencies of events comprising the ordinal score in spurting lesions (13.9% [95% CI 6.6, 24.7] vs. 33.9% [95% CI 22.1, 47.4]; P = 0.01) and gastric ulcers (6.7% [95% CI 4, 10.4] vs. 14.3% [95% CI 10.3, 19.2], P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes amongst pantoprazole and ranitidine-treated patients were similar; pantoprazole provided benefits in patients with arterial spurting and gastric ulcers.

Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to ulcer disease is common and results in substantial patient morbidity and medical expense. After initial resuscitation to stabilize the patient, carefully performed endoscopy provides an accurate diagnosis and identifies high-risk ulcer patients who are likely to rebleed with medical therapy alone and will benefit most from endoscopic hemostasis. For patients with major stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage--active arterial bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessel, and adherent clot--combination therapy with epinephrine injection and either thermal coagulation (multipolar or heater probe) or endoclips is recommended. High-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitors are recommended as concomitant therapy after successful endoscopic hemostasis. Patients with minor stigmata or clean-based ulcers will not benefit from endoscopic treatment and should receive high-dose oral proton pump inhibitor therapy. Effective medical and endoscopic management of ulcer hemorrhage can significantly improve outcomes and decrease the cost of medical care by reducing rebleeding, transfusion requirements, and the need for surgery.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

The use of intravenous pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, has been increasing in the paediatric intensive care unit. Despite this increased use, data on the disposition of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients are very scarce.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our population approach has determined the pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients and the relative importance of factors influencing its disposition. Pantoprazole clearance was significantly influenced by developmental changes and by the presence of systemic inflammatory syndrome, hepatic dysfunction and CYP2C19 inhibitors.

AIMS

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of intravenous pantoprazole in a paediatric intensive care population and to determine the influence of demographic factors, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), hepatic dysfunction and concomitantly used CYP2C19 inducers and inhibitors on the drug's pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

A total of 156 pantoprazole concentration measurements from 20 patients (10 days to 16.4 years of age) at risk for or with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, who received pantoprazole doses ranging from 19.9 to 140.6 mg/1.73 m(2)/day, were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic approach (nonmem program).

RESULTS

The best structural model for pantoprazole was a two-compartment model with zero order infusion and first-order elimination. Body weight, SIRS, age, hepatic dysfunction and presence of CYP2C19 inhibitors were significant covariates affecting clearance (CL), accounting for 75% of interindividual variability. Only body weight significantly influenced central volume of distribution (V(c)). In the final population model, the estimated CL and V(c) were 5.28 l h(-1) and 2.22 l, respectively, for a typical 5-year-old child weighing 20 kg. Pantoprazole CL increased with weight and age, whereas the presence of SIRS, CYP2C19 inhibitors and hepatic dysfunction, when present separately, significantly decreased pantoprazole CL by 62.3, 65.8 and 50.5%, respectively. For patients aged between 6 months and 5 years without SIRS, CYP2C19 inhibitor or hepatic dysfunction, the predicted pantoprazole CL is faster than that reported in adults.

CONCLUSION

These results provide important information for physicians regarding selection of a starting dose and dosing regimens of pantoprazole for paediatric intensive care patients based on factors frequently encountered in this population.

Stress-related mucosal bleeding in critically ill oncology patients

Objective. To determine the incidence of stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB) in a critically ill oncology population receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with either a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Design. Single-center, prospective, observational study.

Setting. Fifty-two bed medical-surgical intensive care unit of an academic oncology institution. Patients. A convenience sample of 100 medical and surgical critically ill oncology patients who received intensive care for more than 24 hours and at least one dose of a H2RA or PPI for prevention of SRMB.

Interventions. None.

Measurements and Main Results. Patients were followed throughout their intensive care unit stay for the development of an overt and/or clinically significant gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. More patients received a PPI (n = 81) in contrast to a H2RA (n = 19) for SUP. Overall, 94 patients (94%) had at least one risk factor for a SRMB with four patients (4%) experiencing an event (overt bleed, n=3; clinically significant bleed, n =1). All cases of GI bleeding occurred in patients receiving a PPI. No ICU deaths were considered directly related to a GI bleed.

Conclusions. The incidence of SRMB among high-risk critically ill oncology patients receiving SUP appears low; further, large-scale trials are needed to confirm this finding. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2009) 15: 9—16.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication and antisecretory maintenance therapy on peptic ulcer recurrence in cirrhotic patients: a prospective, cohort 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The role of Helicobacter pylori eradication to cure peptic ulcer disease in patients with cirrhosis is not clear.

AIM

To investigate the course of peptic ulcer disease in cirrhotics, first after healing with either H. pylori eradication or omeprazole therapy and second while on omeprazole maintenance therapy after recurrence.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study in a tertiary-care hospital in Greece. Out of 365 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent endoscopy, 67 had peptic ulcer and 30 were enrolled. H. pylori positive patients received eradication therapy and H. pylori negative patients received omeprazole treatment. Follow-up endoscopies were performed at 12 and 24 months or when symptoms recurred. Patients with ulcer recurrence were treated with omeprazole maintenance therapy. The main outcome measurement of the study was peptic ulcer relapse rate during follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with healed ulcers were followed for up to 2 years. During follow-up, ulcer relapsed in 17 patients (8/18 H. pylori positive and 9/10 H. pylori negative at study entry, P=0.041), including 2 patients who died from ulcer bleeding. No further ulcer relapse was observed in the remaining 15 patients who received omeprazole maintenance therapy for the rest of follow-up. H. pylori negative status (P=0.002) and severity of cirrhosis (P=0.015) at study entry were independently related to shorter peptic ulcer relapse-free time.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication does not protect all cirrhotics from ulcer recurrence and the majority of ulcers recur in H. pylori negative patients. Therefore, omeprazole maintenance treatment is mandatory, irrespectively of H. pylori status.

Drugs for pH control in upper gastrointestinal bleeding

A few years ago, patients with bleeding peptic ulcers were referred to the surgeon if the bleeding did not stop. Today we have two promising new approaches to prevent emergency surgery. One is endoscopic intervention, the other is the pharmacological approach of blocking the proton pump. The endoscopical techniques of adrenaline injection fibrin-'glue' injection, polidocanol injection and heat coagulation can stop active bleeding in over 90% of cases. Pharmacologically, proton pump inhibitors can quickly achieve the optimal pH condition for support of the physiological cascade of haemostasis. The aim is to keep the intragastric pH above 6.0 for a few days. For the first time this aim can be achieved quickly and reliably by infusion of proton pump inhibitors. The optimal form of application is continuous infusion. Repeated bolus injections do not give optimal results. The optimal dosing was found to be the continuous infusion of 8 mg/h omeprazole or pantoprazole after an initial loading dose of 40-80 mg.

Intravenous administration of lansoprazole: a preliminary study of dose ranging and efficacy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Using 24-h pH monitoring, we studied the optimal dose and mode of administration of lansoprazole (LAN) injection in healthy adult male volunteers in three tests of antisecretory effect. We followed this with a dose-finding study, using the drug's suppressive effect on increased gastric acid secretion due to surgical stress as the indicator. Finally, we conducted a pilot study to determine the optimal mode of administration and efficacy of the drug in patients with haemorrhage from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH monitoring established the order of potency of the different regimens: LAN 30 mg b.d. > LAN 15 mg b.d.; and LAN 30 mg b.d., intravenous drip infusion = LAN 30 mg b.d., bolus injection. Lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. appeared to be slightly more effective than LAN 15 mg b.d. in suppressing increased gastric acid secretion due to post-operative stress and in haemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. No severe adverse effects were observed in either study.

Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of peptic ulcer re-bleeding: rationale/design of Peptic Ulcer Bleed study

BACKGROUND

A limited number of trials have investigated the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for peptic ulcer bleeding, and some study design issues have been identified.

AIM

To present the design of a large trial evaluating the effects of intravenous esomeprazole on clinical outcomes in high-risk patients who have undergone endoscopic haemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding.

METHODS

The Peptic Ulcer Bleed study is an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing either esomeprazole 80 mg intravenous bolus infusion for 30 min followed by esomeprazole 8 mg/h intravenously for 71.5 h, or placebo infusion for 72 h, after successful endoscopic haemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and associated high-risk stigmata. All patients will receive once daily oral esomeprazole 40 mg for 27 days after intravenous therapy. The primary end point is the rate of clinically significant re-bleeding during the first 72 h after endoscopy. Secondary end points include: rate of re-bleeding during the first 7 and 30 days after treatment; length of hospitalization; mortality; blood transfusion; endoscopic re-treatment and surgery.

RESULTS

Expected 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

The carefully designed protocol and quality control measures represent a pragmatic approach to contemporary challenges in peptic ulcer bleeding management and, it is hoped, qualify the Peptic Ulcer Bleed study as a new standard for future interventional studies.

Famotidine Versus Pantoprazole for Preventing Bleeding in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract of Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

Background Mechanical ventilation increases risk for bleeding in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract. Proton pump inhibitors, although they are more potent and longer acting inhibitors of gastric acid production than are histamine2 antagonists, also are generally more expensive. Data comparing the 2 types of agents for preventing gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients are limited.

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of famotidine (a histamine2 antagonist) and pantoprazole (a proton pump inhibitor) in preventing stress ulcers in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Methods Data were collected from the Project Impact database. All patients who received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours from November 2002 to June 2006 and were treated with either drug were included. Patients receiving other drugs or with known bleeding in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract, thrombocytopenia, or coagulopathy were excluded.

Results A total of 522 patients who received famotidine and 95 who received pantoprazole were included. Bleeding in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract was more common in patients receiving pantoprazole than in patients receiving famotidine (0.38% vs 3.2%, P= .03). Although scores on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II were higher in patients who received pantoprazole (P= .01), other outcome measures did not differ significantly between groups. Bleeding in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract was more frequent among dialysis patients receiving pantoprazole than among those receiving famotidine.

Conclusions Famotidine and pantoprazole are similarly effective for preventing bleeding in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

From the H(2) receptor gene to reclassification of the H(2) receptor antagonists

From previous studies it is known that long-term stimulation of the histamine H(2) receptor results in receptor downregulation. Two different pathways are involved in the downregulation process of the H(2) receptor: a cAMP-dependent and cAMP-independent agonist-dependent pathway. Recently, it became evident that in the absence of an agonist the H(2) receptor expressed in CHO cells already stimulate cAMP production, also referred to as spontaneous activity. The spontaneous activity can be inhibited by several H(2) antagonists, previously thought to act as competitive antagonists, and these antagonists are referred to as inverse agonists. Some antagonists, e.g. burimamide, are not able to inhibit the spontaneous activity and are referred to as neutral antagonists. Inverse agonism appears to be the mechanistic basis of upregulation. Only inverse agonists and not neutral antagonists induce receptor upregulation after long-term treatment as these compounds inhibit the spontaneous receptor activity and thus the basal receptor downregulation. Moreover it might also explain previously reported observations after long-term treatment of gastric ulcers, such as intragastric hyperacidity.

Review article: acid-related disease--what are the unmet clinical needs?

Proton pump inhibitors have dramatically improved the management options available for patients with acid-related disorders. In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, currently available proton pump inhibitors provide an excellent outcome for the majority; however, they do not provide optimal pH control in many. Proton pump inhibitors co-therapy reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of gastrointestinal ulcers and complications in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, while in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, it may be difficult to reach and maintain the current therapeutic target of intragastric pH of 6-7. This article reviews the effectiveness of current antisecretory therapy in these three acid-related diseases and areas of unmet clinical need. The potential role of a proton pump inhibitor with an extended duration of action and enhanced acid control from a single daily dose, particularly improved control at night, is discussed. Finally, therapy that could be administered without regard to time of day and/or food intake would offer dosing flexibility and thus have a positive effect on patients' compliance.

Role of intravenous omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection: a prospective randomized comparative trial

BACKGROUND

Epinephrine injection is the most common endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Controversy exists concerning the optimal dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after successful endoscopic therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal dose of PPI after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.

METHODS

A total of 200 peptic ulcer patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels (NBVV) who had obtained initial hemostasis with endoscopic injection of epinephrine were randomized to receive omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h, omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 12 h or cimetidine (CIM) 400 mg infusion every 12 h. Outcomes were checked at 14 days after enrollment.

RESULTS

Rebleeding episodes were fewer in the group with omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h (6/67, 9%) as compared with that of the CIM infusion group (22/67, 32.8%, p < 0.01). The volume of blood transfusion was less in the group with omeprazole 40 mg every 6 h than in those groups with omepraole 40 mg infusion every 12 h (p= 0.001) and CIM 400 mg infusion every 12 h (p < 0.001). The hospital stay, number of patients requiring urgent operation, and death rate were not statistically different among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

A combination of endoscopic epinephrine injection and a large dose of omeprazole infusion is superior to combined endoscopic epinephrine injection with CIM infusion for preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcers with active bleeding or NBVV.

Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: An Approach to Management and Future Trends

Severe sepsis is sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction. Septic shock in turn, implies severe sepsis that has led to circulatory shock refractory to fluid resuscitation alone. The immediate approach to severe sepsis follows the ABCs of resuscitation: Airway, Breathing, and Circulation. Special emphasis on the circulation involves early goal-directed therapy, adequate fluid resuscitation, and vasopressor/inotropic support. Once the patient's cardiorespiratory status is stabilized, efforts must be directed at uncovering the source and empirically yet accurately treating the infective underpinnings of severe sepsis. Following that, each of the patient's other organ systems at risk needs to be addressed: Renal/metabolic, gastrointestinal, hematological, and endocrine. Novel treatments will target both the proinflammatory and procoagulation cascades of sepsis.

Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding yield conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of PPIs in acute bleeding from PU using evidence from RCTs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2004), EMBASE (1980 to November 2004), proceedings of major meetings to November 2004, and reference lists of articles. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of PPI treatment (oral or intravenous) compared with placebo or H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) in acute bleeding from PU.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently, assessed study validity, summarised studies and undertook meta-analysis. The influence of study characteristics on the outcomes was examined by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four RCTs comprising 4373 participants in total were included. Statistical heterogeneity was found among trials for rebleeding (P = 0.04), but not for all-cause mortality (P = 0.24) or surgery (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality rates between PPI and control treatment; pooled rates were 3.9% on PPI versus 3.8% on control (odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.40). PPIs significantly reduced rebleeding compared to control; pooled rates were 10.6% with PPI versus 17.3% with control treatment (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.65). PPI treatment significantly reduced surgery compared with control; pooled rates were 6.1% on PPI versus 9.3% on control (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78). There was no evidence to suggest that results on mortality and rebleeding were dependent on study quality, route of PPI administration, type of control treatment or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment. PPIs significantly reduced surgery compared with placebo but not when compared with H(2)RA. There was no evidence to suggest that study quality, route of PPI administration or application of initial endoscopic haemostatic treatment influenced results on surgery. PPI treatment appeared more efficacious in studies conducted in Asia compared to studies conducted elsewhere. All-cause mortality was reduced only in Asian studies; reductions in rebleeding and surgery were quantitatively greater in Asian studies. Among patients with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessel, PPI treatment reduced mortality (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91), rebleeding and surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPI treatment in PU bleeding reduces rebleeding and surgery compared with placebo or H(2)RA, but there is no evidence of an overall effect on all-cause mortality.

Review article: the role of antisecretory therapy in the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding accounts for 300,000 hospitalizations annually in the US and the risk of rebleeding and mortality remain high. The aim of this study was to review the incidence and causes of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, criteria for early discharge, risk stratification and intravenous vs. oral proton-pump inhibitor use. Peptic ulcer disease accounts for 45% of all admissions for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical and endoscopic predictors of adverse outcome have been identified. The Rockall scoring system identifies patients who can be considered for early discharge after endoscopy. Evidence supports the use of intravenous proton-pump inhibitor therapy for patients with bleeding ulcers associated with high-risk stigmata. Patients who are clinically stable and in whom upper endoscopy has shown an ulcer with a clean base or a flat pigmented spot have a low risk for rebleeding and may be discharged early on oral proton-pump inhibitor therapy. Proton-pump inhibitor treatment reduces ulcer rebleeding but does not affect overall mortality. In the US, most patients with ulcer bleeding have low-risk stigmata, and thus, can be treated with oral proton-pump inhibitors and discharged early.

The effect of regular and high doses of omeprazole on the intragastric acidity in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated endoscopically: a clinical trial with continuous intragastric pH monitoring

OBJECTIVE

In peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB), pH level >4 is considered necessary to prevent dissolving of a formed fibrin clot. The effect of regular or high doses of omeprazole on the intragastric pH in patients with acute PUB was studied.

METHODS

In our earlier study, after endoscopic therapy, PUB patients were randomized to receive a regular dose of intravenous omeprazole (20 mg; i.e. 60 mg/3 days) or a high dose of omeprazole (80 mg bolus + 8 mg/h; i.e. 652 mg/3 days). Of these 142 analysed and reported patients, 13 PUB patients also had intragastric pH monitoring for these 3 days; seven of these patients had a regular dose and six received a high dose of omeprazole.

RESULTS

The mean 24-h intragastric pH (regular versus high dose) on day 1 was 4.9 +/- 1.6 versus 6.3 +/- 0.5 (P = 0.035), on day 2 was 4.9 +/- 1.8 versus 6.7 +/- 0.3 (P = 0.001), and on day 3 was 5.7 +/- 1.1 versus 6.7 +/- 0.5 (P = NS). The medians of the intragastric pH were 6 versus 6.5 (P = 0.082) on day 1, 5.8 versus 6.8 (P = 0.001) on day 2, and 6.2 versus 6.8 (P = 0.17) on day 3. The proportion of time when pH <4 on day 1 was 29.2 +/- 34.1 versus 5.4 +/- 5.7% (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

A regular dose of omeprazole raises the mean and median 24-h intragastric pH >4 in patients with PUB. This reduction in the acidity together with endoscopic therapy is probably sufficient to maintain haemostasis. A high dose of omeprazole keeps the pH almost constantly >6.

Review of immediate-release omeprazole for the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders

Immediate-release omeprazole (Zegerid, Santarus) is the first immediate-release oral proton pump inhibitor to reach the market. As a powder formulation for oral suspension, it is indicated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, erosive oesophagitis, duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer, and is the only proton pump inhibitor approved for the reduction of risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Administration of immediate-release omeprazole at bedtime results in a rapid and sustained elevation of gastric pH, and seems to provide better night time control of gastric acidity than that observed with conventional morning dosing of delayed-release proton pump inhibitors. The immediate-release formulation may provide a good treatment option for patients who require flexible dosing, quick onset of action and nocturnal gastric acid control.

Pathophysiology and prophylaxis of stress ulcer in intensive care unit patients

Gastrointestinal complications frequently occur in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Of these, ulceration and bleeding related to stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) can lengthen hospitalization and increase mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss the many risk factors and underlying illnesses that have a role in the pathophysiology of SRMD and evaluate the evidence pertaining to SRMD prophylaxis in the intensive care unit population. Suppressing acid production is fundamental to preventing stress-related mucosal ulceration and clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. Traditional prophylactic options for SRMD in critically ill patients include antacids, sucralfate, histamine 2 -receptor antagonists (H 2 RAs), and proton pump inhibitors. Many clinicians prescribe intermittent infusions of H 2 RAs for stress ulcer prophylaxis, a practice that has not been approved for this indication and may not provide the necessary degree or duration of acid suppression required to prevent stress ulcer-related bleeding. New data suggest that proton pump inhibitors suppress acid production more completely in critically ill patients, but more studies are required to assess their clinical effectiveness and safety for this indication. The prophylactic regimen chosen to prevent stress ulcer bleeding should take into account the risk factors and underlying disease state of individual patients to provide the best therapy to those most likely to benefit.