EUS and chronic pancreatitis

Combining endoscopic ultrasound and tumor markers improves the diagnostic yield on the etiology of common bile duct dilation secondary to periampullary pathologies

Background

Unexplained common bile duct (CBD) dilatation may be caused by many etiologies, such as periampullary tumors, a pancreatic neoplasm, choledocholithiasis or an inflammatory stenosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients with unexplained CBD dilatation, in combination with tumor markers, liver chemistry, symptoms, surgical history and whether there is dilatation of the pancreatic duct (PD).

Methods

From January 2016 to July 2017, 115 patients were referred for EUS in our center for CBD dilatation of an unknown etiology. A treatment plan is made based on the EUS result combined with the other clinical information. The final diagnosis is determined by surgical histology or follow-up of at least 3 months.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS for patients with choledocholithiasis were 100.0% (10/10), 100.0% (105/105) and 100.0% (115/115), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS for patients with periampullary tumor were 86.5% (32/37), 89.7% (70/78) and 88.7% (102/115), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS for patients with inflammatory stenosis were 88.2% (60/68), 89.4% (42/47) and 88.7% (102/115), respectively. The overall accuracy of EUS for diagnosing an undetermined etiology for CBD dilatation was 88.7% (102/115) and was higher than the accuracy of ultrasound (US) (64.1%), computed tomography (CT) (66.2%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (67.0%) or PET-CT (66.0%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EUS combined with tumor markers for patients with malignant dilatation of CBD were 91.9% (34/37), 97.4% (76/78), 94.4% (34/36), 96.2% (76/79) and 95.7% (110/115), respectively. PD dilation (P=0.026) and weight loss (P=0.035) had significant predictive values of malignancy.

Conclusions

EUS is an effective diagnostic tool for determining the etiology of a CBD dilatation, and offers meaningful information for guiding a treatment plan. EUS used in conjunction with tumor markers has high yield in differentiating benign and malignant CBD dilatation. More attention should be paid to patients with PD dilation or weight loss to prevent misdiagnosis of malignant CBD dilation.

Assessing the value of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting symptom severity and long-term clinical course in chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

To date, no studies have evaluated the correlation between number of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) criteria met for chronic pancreatitis (CP) and symptom severity over the course of the disease. This study assessed the relationship between number of EUS-based diagnostic criteria for CP and CP severity over time.

METHODS

A University of Louisville database was queried for patients undergoing EUS due to concern for chronic pancreatitis between 2005 and 2016. Patients were grouped based on EUS criteria met for CP and groups were compared along outcome and procedural variables.

RESULTS

Of a total of 243 patients, 24, 129, and 90 patients met 1-3, 4-5, and ≥6 EUS diagnostic criteria, respectively. Median follow-up time was 33 months. Along all follow-up parameters, number of diagnostic criteria was positively correlated with an increased percentage of patients requiring operative intervention for chronic pancreatitis on univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the role of EUS criteria in establishing the diagnostic severity of patients with symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, the number of EUS-based criteria may help predict patients who will eventually require operative intervention and thus prompt referral to a pancreatobiliary surgeon earlier in the course of a patient's disease.

Trends in the Use of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Management of Chronic Pancreatitis in the United States

GOALS

The aim of this study was to characterize current trends in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States for patients hospitalized with chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND

Historically, ERCP was the primary tool for diagnostic and therapeutic management of chronic pancreatitis. With increased availability of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound, indications for ERCP are being redefined.

STUDY

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2010. We identified patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis who underwent ERCP. We excluded patients diagnosed with biliary, gallbladder, or pancreatic neoplasm and patients who underwent gallbladder or pancreatic operation during the same admission. We analyzed patient and hospital characteristics, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality, and adjusted for weighted sample schema.

RESULTS

During the study period, 29,318 patients with chronic pancreatitis (mean age 52 y, 57.2% female) underwent ERCP during their hospitalization. The majority of patients were white (56.1%). The majority of procedures were performed at large (72.4%), urban (95.2%), and academic (69.0%) hospitals. Mean hospital charges were $32,929 (SE= $1605). Mean length of stay was 6 days (SE=0.3), with in-hospital mortality of 0.76%. Over the study period, the number of procedures has decreased significantly (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, ERCP has been an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool for chronic pancreatitis. Over the last decade, ERCP has become an uncommon inpatient procedure for chronic pancreatitis.

A new descriptor for computer-aided diagnosis of EUS imaging to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Computer-aided diagnosis of EUS images was quite useful in differentiating pancreatic cancer from normal tissue and chronic pancreatitis. This study investigated the feasibility of using computer-aided diagnostic techniques to extract EUS image parameters to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

A new descriptor, local ternary pattern variance, was introduced to improve the performance of the classification model. Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 81) or chronic pancreatitis (n = 100) were recruited for this study. Representative EUS images were selected, and 115 parameters from 10 categories were extracted from the region of interest. Distance-between-class and sequential forward selection algorithms were used for their ideal combination of features that allowed a support vector machine predictive model to be built, trained, and validated. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were used to evaluate the performance of experimental results.

RESULTS

Fourteen parameters from 3 categories were selected as an ideal combination of features. The sample set was randomly divided into a training set and a testing set by using two different algorithms-the leave-one-out algorithm and the half-and-half method. The half-and-half method yielded an average (± standard deviation) accuracy of 89.3 ± 2.7%, sensitivity of 84.1 ± 6.4%, specificity of 92.5 ± 3.3%, PPV of 91.6 ± 3.7%, and NPV of autoimmune pancreatitis of 88.0 ± 4.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, with the local ternary pattern variance textural feature, computer-aided diagnosis of EUS imaging may be valuable to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from chronic pancreatitis. Further refinement of such models could generate tools for the clinical diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound in patients with normal liver blood tests and unexplained dilatation of common bile duct and or pancreatic duct

OBJECTIVE

To determine the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the investigation of patients with normal liver function tests (LFTs) and unexplained dilatation of common bile duct (CBD) and/or pancreatic duct (PD), following CT and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing linear EUS between January 2007 and August 2011 for the indication of dilated CBD and/or PD, normal LFT, and nondiagnostic cross-sectional imaging formed the study group. The study was performed as a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

During the study period, 83 patients (CBD and PD dilatation n = 38, PD dilatation n = 5, CBD dilatation n = 40) met the inclusion criteria and underwent EUS. Five (13.1%) of the CBD and PD groups had a new finding, which in one (2.6%) case was causal. In this group, men were significantly more likely to have a new finding (p = 0.012). Eight (20%) of the CBD group had a new finding, which in seven (17.5%) cases was causal. In the CBD group, cholecystectomy was significantly (p = 0.005) more common in those without a finding. Three (60%) of the PD group had a finding on EUS, all of which were causal, including a case of pancreatic malignancy.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant yield from EUS in individuals with isolated PD dilatation and isolated CBD dilatation. Previous cholecystectomy is significantly associated with a negative EUS in the group with isolated CBD dilatation. The yield in those with CBD and PD dilatation was low and a finding was more likely in males.

Pancreatic abnormalities detected by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients without clinical signs of pancreatic disease: any difference between standard and Rosemont classification scoring?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of nine EUS features of chronic pancreatitis (CP) according to the standard Wiersema classification has been investigated in 489 patients undergoing EUS for an indication not related to pancreatico-biliary disease. We showed that 82 subjects (16.8%) had at least one ductular or parenchymal abnormality. Among them, 18 (3.7% of study population) had ≥3 Wiersema criteria suggestive of CP. Recently, a new classification (Rosemont) of EUS findings consistent, suggestive or indeterminate for CP has been proposed.

AIM

To stratify healthy subjects into different subgroups on the basis of EUS features of CP according to the Wiersema and Rosemont classifications and to evaluate the agreement in the diagnosis of CP with the two scoring systems. Weighted kappa statistics was computed to evaluate the strength of agreement between the two scoring systems. Univariate and multivariate analysis between any EUS abnormality and habits were performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-two EUS videos were reviewed. Using the Wiersema classification, 18 subjects showed ≥3 EUS features suggestive of CP. The EUS diagnosis of CP in these 18 subjects was considered as consistent in only one patient, according to Rosemont classification. Weighted Kappa statistics was 0.34 showing that the strength of agreement was 'fair'. Alcohol use and smoking were identified as risk factors for having pancreatic abnormalities on EUS.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of EUS features consistent or suggestive of CP in healthy subjects according to the Rosemont classification is lower than that assessed by Wiersema criteria. In that regard the Rosemont classification seems to be more accurate in excluding clinically relevant CP. Overall agreement between the two classifications is fair.

Ultrasonography in diagnosing chronic pancreatitis: New aspects

The course and outcome is poor for most patients with pancreatic diseases. Advances in pancreatic imaging are important in the detection of pancreatic diseases at early stages. Ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool has made, virtually speaking a technical revolution in medical imaging in the new millennium. It has not only become the preferred method for first line imaging, but also, increasingly to clarify the interpretation of other imaging modalities to obtain efficient clinical decision. We review ultrasonography modalities, focusing on advanced pancreatic imaging and its potential to substantially improve diagnosis of pancreatic diseases at earlier stages. In the first section, we describe scanning techniques and examination protocols. Their consequences for image quality and the ability to obtain complete and detailed visualization of the pancreas are discussed. In the second section we outline ultrasonographic characteristics of pancreatic diseases with emphasis on chronic pancreatitis. Finally, new developments in ultrasonography of the pancreas such as contrast enhanced ultrasound and elastography are enlightened.

Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm is challenging in patients with inconclusive findings on pancreatic multidetector row CT (MDCT).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy and to identify predictors of pancreatic neoplasm by EUS with FNA in this setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review during the study period of January 2002 to December 2010.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Of the 1046 patients who underwent pancreatic EUS, 116 patients were selected because their clinical presentation was suspicious for pancreatic malignancy, but their MDCT findings were inconclusive.

INTERVENTION

EUS with FNA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Diagnostic yield of malignancy and significance of clinical variables.

RESULTS

When surgical pathology or subsequent clinical course was used as the criterion standard, EUS with FNA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 87.3%, 98.3%, 98.5%, and 92.1%, respectively, in diagnosing a pancreatic neoplasm that was indeterminate on MDCT. Factors significantly associated with EUS detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were total bilirubin level greater than 2 mg/dL (P < .001), CT finding of pancreatic duct dilation (P < .001), bile duct stricture (P < .001), and tumor size 1.5 cm or larger detected by EUS (P = .004). Among them, pancreatic duct dilation on CT (odds ratio 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-11.05), and tumor size 1.5 cm or larger detected by EUS (odds ratio 8.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-35.45) were independent risk factors.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and patient referral bias.

CONCLUSIONS

When MDCT is indeterminate, EUS is a highly sensitive and accurate modality for the detection of pancreatic neoplasm, especially when the tumor is smaller than 2.0 cm.

Differentiation of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis using computer-aided diagnosis of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images: a diagnostic test

Background

Differentiating pancreatic cancer (PC) from normal tissue by computer-aided diagnosis of EUS images were quite useful. The current study was designed to investigate the feasibility of using computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) techniques to extract EUS image parameters for the differential diagnosis of PC and chronic pancreatitis (CP).

Methodology/Principal Findings

This study recruited 262 patients with PC and 126 patients with CP. Typical EUS images were selected from the sample sets. Texture features were extracted from the region of interest using computer-based techniques. Then the distance between class algorithm and sequential forward selection (SFS) algorithm were used for a better combination of features; and, later, a support vector machine (SVM) predictive model was built, trained, and validated. Overall, 105 features of 9 categories were extracted from the EUS images for pattern classification. Of these features, the 16 were selected as a better combination of features. Then, SVM predictive model was built and trained. The total cases were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set. The training set was used to train the SVM, and the testing set was used to evaluate the performance of the SVM. After 200 trials of randomised experiments, the average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the positive and negative predictive values of pancreatic cancer were 94.2±0.1749%,96.25±0.4460%, 93.38±0.2076%, 92.21±0.4249% and 96.68±0.1471%, respectively.

Conclusions/Significance

Digital image processing and computer-aided EUS image differentiation technologies are highly accurate and non-invasive. This technology provides a kind of new and valuable diagnostic tool for the clinical determination of PC.

The increasing role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the management of pancreatic and biliary disease

Pancreatic and biliary disease continues to have a significant impact on the workload of the National Health Service (NHS), for which there exists a multimodality approach to investigation and diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is fast becoming a fundamental tool in this cohort of patients, not only because of its ability to provide superior visualization of a difficult anatomical region, but also because of its valuable role as a problem-solving tool and ever-improving ability in an interventional capacity. We provide a comprehensive review of the benefits of EUS in everyday clinical practice.

A prediction rule for estimating pancreatic cancer risk in chronic pancreatitis patients with focal pancreatic mass lesions with prior negative EUS-FNA cytology

OBJECTIVE

Considerable false-negative endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) findings exist in chronic pancreatitis patients with focal pancreatic mass lesions. Our aim was to develop a prediction rule to stratify risk for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis patients with focal pancreatic mass lesions with prior negative EUS-FNA cytology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 138 eligible consecutive patients were identified from three hospitals between January 2000 and May 2008. A final diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions was confirmed histologically or verified by a follow-up of at least 12 months. A prediction rule was developed from a logistic regression model by using a regression coefficient-based scoring method, and then internally validated by using bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The rate of pancreatic cancer in the cohort was 18.1%. The prediction rule, which was scored from 0 to 10 points, comprised five variables: sex, mass location, mass number, direct bilirubin, and CA 19-9. Among the 87.7% of patients with low-risk scores (≤ 3), the risk of pancreatic cancer was 13.2%; by comparison, this risk was 52.9% (p < 0.001) among the 12.3% of patients with high-risk scores (> 3). If further invasive tests were used for patients with high risk, 36% of patients with pancreatic cancer would not be missed. The prediction rule had good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.72) and calibration (p = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction rule can provide available risk stratification for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis patients with focal mass lesions with prior negative EUS-FNA cytology. Application of risk stratification may improve clinical decision making.

EUS compared with endoscopy plus transabdominal US in the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with upper abdominal pain

BACKGROUND

Primary upper endoscopy (EGD) and transabdominal US (TUS) are often performed in patients with upper abdominal pain.

OBJECTIVE

Primary: Determine whether the combination of EGD and EUS was equivalent to EGD plus TUS in the diagnostic evaluation of upper abdominal pain. Secondary: Compare EUS versus TUS in detecting abdominal lesions, and compare EGD by using an oblique-viewing echoendoscope versus the standard, forward-viewing endoscope in detecting mucosal lesions.

DESIGN

Prospective, paired design.

SETTING

Six academic endoscopy centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved patients with upper abdominal pain referred for endoscopy.

INTERVENTION

All patients had EGD, EUS, and TUS. The EGD was done using both an oblique-viewing echoendoscope and the standard, forward-viewing endoscope (randomized order) by two separate endoscopists in a blinded fashion, followed by EUS. TUS was performed within 4 weeks of EGD/EUS, also in a blinded fashion.

FOLLOW-UP

telephone interviews and chart reviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Diagnose possible etiology of upper abdominal pain and detect clinically significant lesions.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of the etiology of upper abdominal pain was made in 66 of 172 patients (38%). The diagnostic rate was 42 of 66 patients (64%) for EGD plus EUS versus 41 of 66 patients (62%) for EGD plus TUS, which was statistically equivalent (McNemar test; P = .27). One hundred ninety-eight lesions were diagnosed with either EUS or TUS. EUS was superior to TUS for visualizing the pancreas (P < .0001) and for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (P = .03). Two biliary stones were detected only by EUS. Two hundred fifty-one mucosal lesions were similarly diagnosed with EGD with either the standard, forward-viewing endoscope or the oblique-viewing echoendoscope (kappa = 0.48 [95% CI, .43-.54]). EGD with the standard, forward-viewing endoscope was preferred for biopsies.

LIMITATIONS

No cost analysis.

CONCLUSION

The combination of EGD with EUS is equivalent to EGD plus TUS for diagnosing a potential etiology of upper abdominal pain. EUS is superior to TUS for detecting chronic pancreatitis. EGD combined with EUS should be considered in the first-line diagnostic evaluation of patients with upper abdominal pain.

Chronic pancreatitis-like changes detected by endoscopic ultrasound in subjects without signs of pancreatic disease: do these indicate age-related changes, effects of xenobiotics, or early chronic pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The threshold number of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) criteria for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (CP) is variable. The presence of more than three abnormal ductular or parenchymal features is typically used, but the diagnostic significance of fewer EUS criteria is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of EUS features of CP in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease and to analyze the association with specific factors of interest.

METHODS

Over a 24-month period, 2,614 patients underwent EUS for an indication unrelated to pancreaticobiliary disease. Main outcome measurements wereunivariate and multivariate analysis between any EUS abnormality and demographic data and habits.

RESULTS

82 patients (16.8%) showed at least one ductular or parenchymal abnormality. 38 patients presented with only one abnormal feature, 26 patients with two, 12 patients with three, 4 patients with four, and 2 patients with five. Low-level alcohol consumption significantly increased the risk of hyperechoic parenchymal foci, main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation and wall hyperechogenicity. Smoking was associated with an increased risk of hyperechoic parenchymal foci. Male gender and advanced age were significantly associated with an increased risk of MPD dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term smoking and alcohol consumption, although at a low dose, induces CP-like changes. These abnormalities might represent either a clinically silent CP or a toxic effect of smoking and alcohol. Conversely, MPD dilation might represent a normal age-related variant or, alternatively, an effect of chronic low-level alcohol consumption. and IAP.

Role of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography in 2010

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was introduced 25 years ago aiming at better visualization of the pancreas compared to transabdominal ultrasonography. This update discusses the current evidence in 2010 concerning the role of EUS in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic disease. Major indications of EUS are: (1) Detection of common bile duct stones (e.g. in acute pancreatitis); (2) Detection of small exo- and endocrine pancreatic tumours; and (3) Performance of fine needle aspiration in pancreatic masses depending on therapeutic consequences. EUS seems to be less useful in cases of chronic pancreatitis and cystic pancreatic lesions. Moreover the constant improvement of computed tomography has limited the role of EUS in pancreatic cancer staging. On the other hand, new therapeutic options are available due to EUS, such as pancreatic cyst drainage and celiac plexus neurolysis, offering a new field in which new techniques may arise. So the main goal of this review is to determine the exact role of EUS in a number of pancreatic and biliary diseases.

Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis: Where are we now?

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is well suited for assessment of the pancreas due to its high resolution and the proximity of the transducer to the pancreas, avoiding air in the gut. Evaluation of chronic pancreatitis (CP) was an early target for EUS, initially just for diagnosis but later for therapeutic purposes. The diagnosis of CP is still accomplished using the standard scoring based on nine criteria, all considered to be of equal value. For diagnosis of any CP, at least three or four criteria must be fulfilled, but for diagnosis of severe CP at least six criteria are necessary. The Rosemont classification, more restrictive, aims to standardize the criteria and assigns different values to different features, but requires further validation. EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is less advisable for diagnosis of diffuse CP due to its potential side effects. Elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS are orientation in differentiating a focal pancreatic mass in a parenchyma with features of CP, but they cannot replace EUS-FNA. The usefulness of EUS-guided celiac block for painful CP is still being debated with regard to the best technique and the indications. EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts is preferred in non-bulging pseudocysts or in the presence of portal hypertension. EUS-guided drainage of the main pancreatic duct should be reserved for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed owing to difficult cannulation of the papilla or difficult endotherapy. It should be performed only by highly skilled endoscopists, due to the high rate of complications.

Diagnosis of pancreatic tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography

Pancreatic tumors are highly diverse, as they can be solid or cystic, and benign or malignant. Since their imaging features overlap considerably, it is often difficult to characterize these tumors. In addition, small pancreatic tumors, especially those less than 2 cm in diameter, are difficult to detect and diagnose. For characterizing pancreatic tumors and detecting small pancreatic tumors, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most sensitive of the imaging procedures currently available. This technique also provides good results in terms of the preoperative staging of pancreatic tumors. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has also proved to be a safe and useful method for tissue sampling of pancreatic tumors. Despite these advantages, however, it is still difficult to differentiate between benign and malignant, solid or cystic pancreatic tumors, malignant neoplasms, and chronic pancreatitis using EUS, even when EUS-FNA is performed. Recently, contrast-enhanced EUS with Doppler mode (CE-EUS) employing ultrasound contrast agents, which indicate vascularization in pancreatic lesions, has been found to be useful in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors, especially small pancreatic tumors. However, Doppler ultrasonography with contrast-enhancement has several limitations, including blooming artifacts, poor spatial resolution, and low sensitivity to slow flow. Consequently, an echoendoscope was developed recently that has a broad-band transducer and an imaging mode that was designed specifically for contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) with a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent. The CEH-EUS technique is expected to improve the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease in the future. This review describes the EUS appearances of common solid and cystic pancreatic masses, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA, and the relative efficacies and advantages of CE-EUS and CEH-EUS along with their relative advantages and their complementary roles in clinical practice.

Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disorders

The close proximity of the endoscopic ultrasound probe to the pancreas coupled with the ability to perform fine needle aspiration has made endoscopic ultrasound an extremely important technique for the evaluation of both benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary disorders. In parallel to the widespread importance of diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound, the therapeutic and interventional applications of this procedure are expanding and may become a major breakthrough in the management of pancreaticobiliary diseases. This article focuses on the utility and recent advances of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation pancreaticobiliary disorders and analyses the data of well established interventional procedures such as celiac plexus neurolysis and pseudocyst drainage. Moreover, the more innovative procedures, such endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary and pancreatic ducts access and drainage and the experimental use of direct endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy of both solid and cystic pancreatic lesions will also be reviewed.

EUS/EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic cancer: influence of chronic pancreatitis and clinical presentation with or without obstructive jaundice on performance characteristics

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of EUS-FNA is debated in patients with obstructive jaundice (ObJ) because of a very high pretest probability of pancreatobiliary malignancy (PBM) and biliary stent-induced inflammation that can potentially confound EUS-FNA diagnosis. EUS-FNA also has lower accuracy in patients with underlying chronic pancreatitis (CP).

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the clinical value of EUS-FNA for PBM diagnosis based on clinical presentation and presence of CP.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospective database.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent EUS-FNA from 2002 to 2006 for suspected PBM based on (1) ObJ with biliary stricture or a mass lesion or (2) abnormal pancreatic imaging by CT/MRI: a focal pancreatic "mass" lesion; dilated pancreatic duct +/- common bile duct; or an enlarged head of pancreas.

INTERVENTIONS

EUS was performed with a radial echoendoscope followed by a linear echoendoscope if a focal pancreatic lesion was identified. Fine-needle aspirates were assessed immediately by an attending cytopathologist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

(1) Prevalence of cancer and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-FNA.

RESULTS

PBM was diagnosed in 73.9% of patients with ObJ and biliary stricture or pancreatic mass, in 49.6% of patients with pancreatic mass, and in 7.0% of patients with an enlarged head of pancreas or dilated pancreatic duct +/- common bile duct. The prevalence of PBM was lower in all 3 presentations with associated CP. Both CP and presentation with ObJ lowered performance characteristics of EUS-FNA, but CP did so only in the subset of patients with ObJ. All except 1 false-negative diagnoses were due to cytologic misinterpretation.

LIMITATION

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with suspected PBM, the accuracy of EUS-FNA is significantly lower only in a subset of patients with ObJ with underlying CP, largely as a result of difficulty in cytologic interpretation.

Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease--its influence on surgical decision-making. An update 2008

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was introduced about 25 years ago with the primary aim of better visualization of the pancreas as compared to transabdominal ultrasonography. This review discusses the current evidence in 2008 concerning the role of EUS in the clinical management of patients, with a special emphasis on its impact on surgical therapy. According to the literature, good indications are detection of common bile duct stones (e.g. in acute pancreatitis), the detection of small exo- and endocrine pancreatic tumors, the performance of fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses depending on therapeutic consequences. In other areas such as diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and cystic pancreatic lesions, the contribution of EUS seems limited. Pancreatic cancer staging is discussed controversially due to conflicting evidence and certainly has lost grounds due to improvements in CT technology. Therapeutic EUS is, however, more widely accepted and may replace other techniques, e.g. in pancreatic cyst drainage and celiac plexus neurolysis; further techniques of interest are being developed.

Endoscopic ultrasonography for evaluating patients with recurrent pancreatitis

Acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) is still a complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. In up to 30% of cases of ARP, it is not possible to establish the etiology of the disease. In the other 70%, many factors play an etiological role in ARP: microlithiasis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), pancreas divisum, hereditary pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, a choledochocele, annular pancreas, an anomalous pancreatobiliary junction, pancreatic tumors or chronic pancreatitis are diagnosed. EUS should be useful in ARP as it is sensitive for diagnosing bile duct stones, gallbladder sludge, pancreatic lesions, ductal abnormalities and chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) appears to be diagnostic in the majority of patients with previously unexplained pancreatitis, and offers an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the initial diagnostic test in patients with ARP.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in characterizing mass lesions in chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

The aim of this study is to determine the influence of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the detection of chronic pancreatitis and identification of pancreatic masses suspected by other radiographic imaging modalities in such a clinical background.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on 105 consecutive pancreatic EUS examinations in an 18-month period at a single tertiary care referral center. Analysis included 75 patients with a suspected pancreatic mass by computerized axial tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreotography. All patients underwent EUS examination and if a mass was visualized, fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed. Patients underwent either surgical exploration or clinical and radiographic follow-up for 6 months to confirm EUS findings.

RESULTS

Chronic pancreatitis was suspected in 53 individuals by clinical or radiographic methods. Using standard EUS parenchymal and ductal criteria, chronic pancreatitis was confirmed in 41 (77%) of patients. In 33 patients with chronic pancreatitis detected by EUS, initial referral was for pancreatic mass. Twenty-eight (85%) patients had an actual mass and the remainder were false-positive clinical findings. Thirty-two percent of pancreatic masses in chronic pancreatitis were found to be malignant adenocarcinoma and the rest were inflammatory in nature. Subset analysis showed EUS-fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions to have a sensitivity and specificity of 87.9% and 100%, respectively. Detection of cystic lesions had a sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS is superior to other radiographic modalities in the determination of chronic pancreatitis and detection of mass lesions.

Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study

BACKGROUND

Studies that correlated EUS features of chronic pancreatitis (CP) with histopathology are retrospective and only include patients with severe disease or calcific pancreatitis. Controversies regarding the significance of EUS features of noncalcific CP (NCCP) remain unresolved.

OBJECTIVE

To correlate EUS criteria for NCCP with histology from surgical specimens.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent EUS for pancreaticobiliary indications and subsequent pancreatic surgery. Patients with calcific pancreatitis were excluded.

METHODS

Individual CP features on EUS were carefully documented with relation to different parts of the pancreas. Standard EUS criteria for CP were adopted. All patients underwent surgery within 2 months of EUS. A single pathologist blinded to EUS findings reviewed the specimens and graded fibrosis (total score, 12; >or=6=unequivocal CP). A quantitative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Correlate EUS criteria for NCCP, with histology from surgical specimens.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients evaluated, NCCP was diagnosed histologically in 21 patients (50%). None of the patients had CP diagnosis by CT. ROC curve analysis revealed that 4 or more EUS criteria provided the best sensitivity (90.5%), specificity (85.7%), and accuracy (88.1%) for diagnosing NCCP. Parenchymal EUS features that were significantly associated with histopathologic NCCP were foci (P<.0001), stranding (P<.001), and lobulations (P=.04); ductal features that were significantly associated with histopathologic NCCP were dilated (P<.0001) or irregular main pancreatic duct (P<.0001), side branches (P<.001), and hyperechoic duct margins (P=.03). There was a significant correlation between the number of EUS criteria and severity of NCCP on histology (r=0.85; P<.0001).

LIMITATIONS

Small number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

An excellent correlation exists between EUS and histologic findings of NCCP.

Technology insight: applications of MRI for the evaluation of benign disease of the pancreas

This article reviews the role of MRI in the evaluation of benign pancreatic disease. Although MRI and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are most often used to evaluate the liver and bile duct, technical advances such as the use of secretin stimulation also allow for high-quality imaging of the pancreas and pancreatic ductal system. Secretin-stimulated MRCP (S-MRCP) can aid the diagnosis of acute and chronic pancreatitis, and delineate ductal pathology such as benign strictures and duct leaks. There seems to be a role for S-MRCP in the assessment of pancreatic function and (possibly) sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. When endoscopic or surgical therapy is planned, S-MRCP can help to establish a diagnosis as well as offer a 'road map' to guide therapy. S-MRCP is noninvasive and almost entirely without risk to the patient, which gives it a distinct advantage over traditional endoscopic methods of diagnosis for conditions such as pancreas divisum and other ductal pathology. The information provided by S-MRCP, obtained before endoscopic or surgical therapy is attempted, can assist the patient and physician in making a fully informed decision with regard to the risks and probable benefits of any planned intervention.

Role of endosonography in non-malignant pancreatic diseases

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the evaluation of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases. The ability to obtain high quality images and perform fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has led EUS to become the diagnostic test of choice when evaluating the pancreas. This article will review the role of EUS in benign pancreatic diseases.