Endoscopic minor papilla interventions in patients without pancreas divisum

Endoscopic assessment of minor papilla morphology: Predictors of successful cannulation and procedural pancreatitis risk in minor papilla endotherapy

BACKGROUND

We evaluated for predictors of successful cannulation and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in minor papilla endotherapy (MPE), emphasizing endoscopic minor papilla morphology.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 232 MPEs in 65 patients, assessing minor papilla morphology based on three features: bulge as "prominent" or "subtle," mucosal appearance as "papilla-like" resembling the main papilla or "SMT-like" akin to a gastrointestinal submucosal tumor, and orifice visibility as "clear" or "unclear." Cannulation success was evaluated in 65 enrolled patients, with PEP risk assessed in all 232 MPEs.

RESULTS

Minor papilla morphology was categorized as prominent/subtle bulge in 42/23 patients, papilla-like/SMT-like mucosal appearance in 42/23, and clear/unclear orifice visibility in 24/41. Cannulation succeeded in 54/65 patients (83%). A papilla-like appearance and clear orifice visibility was significantly associated with cannulation success. PEP incidence was 5.2% and predominantly mild. A papilla-like appearance significantly decreased PEP incidence, while precutting technique and orifice dilation significantly increased PEP risk.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating minor papilla morphology may help predict cannulation success and PEP risk in MPE. A papilla-like mucosal appearance prognosticates cannulation success and reduced PEP risk, with clear orifice visibility serving as a success predictor. These findings provide practical guidance for preprocedural planning by emphasizing the importance of minor papilla morphology evaluation.

Diagnostic ability of pancreatic juice cytology via the minor papilla in patients with pancreas divisum

Background and study aim

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is generally performed via the major papilla when evaluating patients with pancreatic disease. However, in patients with pancreas divisum (PD) or distortion of the main pancreatic duct, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) should be performed via the minor papilla (MP). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pancreatic juice cytology (PJC), performed via the MP, in patients with PD.

Patients and methods

Patients with PD who underwent diagnostic ERP via the MP, between January 2010 and February 2021, were identified retrospectively from our hospital's ERCP database. Twenty‐two patients contributing to 24 ERCPs were included in the analysis.

Results

MP cannulation was successful in 23 of 24 ERCPs (96%). In one patient, successful cannulation was achieved on the second attempt and the procedure was performed twice in another. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) was performed in 17 patients, with a single aspiration of pancreatic juice performed in the other five. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of ERCP diagnosis, overall, were 56%, 100%, and 80%, respectively. When diagnosis only based on SPACE was considered, the accuracy rate was even higher at 87%. Three patients (13%) developed mild pancreatitis as an adverse event.

Conclusions

The diagnostic ability of endoscopic PJC, via the MP in patients with PD was technically feasible and relatively effective under experienced pancreatobiliary endoscopists, however, requiring careful attention to post‐ERCP pancreatitis when performed.

Balloon Dilatation of the Minor Duodenal Papilla Up to 4 mm is Safe in a Porcine Model

OBJECTIVES

Balloon dilatation of the minor duodenal papilla is a treatment option for symptomatic pancreas divisum. The histologic effects of balloon dilatation have not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study is to investigate the tolerated extent of dilatation of the minor papilla.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dilatation of the minor papilla was performed in freshly explanted pancreas of pigs using biliary balloon dilatators. Three organs were not dilated (control group), in each 8 organs a dilatation of 4, 6, and 8 mm, respectively, was performed. Tissue damage was assessed by microscopic evaluation. Ductal wall disruption and perforation as well as a semiquantitative inflammation score was described and compared.

RESULTS

Ductal wall disruption was increased by dilatation of 6 (5/8; P=0.019) and 8 mm (6/8; P=0.006) compared with 4 mm (1/8). Median inflammation score was 0 (0 to 0), 1 (0 to 2), and 1 (0 to 2) for dilatation of 4, 6, and 8 mm, respectively (4 vs. 6 mm, P=0.007; 4 vs. 8 mm, P=0.026). No perforation occurred in the 4 (0/8) and 6 mm (0/8) group, 1 perforation occurred in the 8 mm group (1/8).

CONCLUSIONS

A dilatation of up to 4 mm seems to be safe. However, dilatation of the minor papilla from 4 mm onwards is increasingly associated with tissue damage. These findings should be considered in endoscopic procedures dilating the minor duodenal papilla.

Clinical response to dorsal duct drainage via the minor papilla in refractory obstructing chronic calcific pancreatitis

Background and study aims Complete stone removal from the main pancreatic duct might not be achieved in all patients with obstructive chronic calcific pancreatitis. We report our results for endoscopic dorsal pancreatic duct (DPD) bypass of obstructing stones in the ventral pancreatic duct (VPD). Patients and methods 16 patients with obstructive chronic calcific pancreatitis were treated with a DPD bypass. Clinical success was defined as significant pain relief and no hospital admissions for pain management during the ongoing treatment period. Results Among 16 patients meeting entry criteria, 10 (62.5 %) had a history of unsuccessful endoscopic therapy, and 8 had failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Clinical success was achieved in 12 patients (75 %). Among these responders, 10 patients (83.3 %) had markedly improved or complete pain relief after the first stent placement, which persisted throughout the follow-up period; 11 patients (91.7 %) were able to discontinue their daily analgesics. Conclusions In selected patients with obstructive chronic calcific pancreatitis, the DPD bypass may be considered as a rescue endoscopic therapy, potentially obviating the need for surgery when standard endoscopic methods and ESWL fail.

Minor papilla endotherapy in patients with ventral duct obstruction: identification and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation via the major papilla may be compromised by downstream obstruction of the ventral PD from a stone or stricture. In patients with a patent accessory PD, cannulation of the minor papilla permits stenting or stone removal upstream of the ventral PD obstruction. Data on this technique are limited.

METHODS

University of Colorado Hospital and Maine Medical Center endoscopy databases were queried for ERCPs with minor papilla cannulation. Technical success was defined as deep cannulation of the minor papilla. Minor papilla endotherapy included sphincterotomy, stricture dilation, stenting, or stone treatment. Clinical improvement was designated as >50% reduction in pain or narcotic analgesia. Follow-up was obtained by chart review and telephone contact.

RESULTS

Over a 22-year period, 464 patients had minor papilla cannulation. Congenital and incomplete pancreas divisum were excluded, and 64 patients met study criteria. Technical success was achieved in 58 of 64 patients (91%). In patients with stones, 25 of 34 (74%) had clearance using endoscopic techniques. Median follow-up was 15.5 months. Twelve of 28 patients (43%) on chronic narcotic regimens reported a reduction in narcotic use by >50%, and 32 of 44 patients (73%) reached for discussion noted improved abdominal pain by >50%. Thirteen patients required surgery for symptom control.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter experience, 15% of patients undergoing minor papilla cannulation had acquired a ventral PD obstruction. Access via the minor papilla to the upstream main PD for endotherapy and clinical improvement was achieved in most patients. Increased and early recognition of these intensive therapeutic options may enhance treatment options for this complex group of patients.

Endoscopic treatment for pancreatic diseases: Needle-knife-guided cannulation via the minor papilla

AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of meticulous cannulation by needle-knife.

METHODS: Three needle-knife procedures were used to facilitate cannulation in cases when standard cannulation techniques failed. A total of 104 cannulations via the minor papilla attempted in 74 patients at our center between January 2008 and June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: Standard methods were successful in 79 cannulations. Of the 25 cannulations that could not be performed by standard methods, 19 were performed by needle-knife, while 17 (89.5%) were successful. Needle-knife use improved the success rate of cannulation [76.0%, 79/104 vs 92.3%, (79 + 17)/104; P = 0.001]. When the 6 cases not appropriate for needle-knife cannulation were excluded, the success rate was improved further (80.6%, 79/98 vs 98.0%, 96/98; P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in the rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography adverse events between the group using standard methods alone and the group using needle-knife after failure of standard methods (4.7% vs 10.5%, P = 0.301).

CONCLUSION: The needle-knife procedure may be an alternative method for improving the success rate of cannulation via the minor papilla, particularly when standard cannulation has failed.

Endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases

AIM: To clarify the efficacy and safety of an endoscopic approach through the minor papilla for the management of pancreatic diseases.

METHODS: This study included 44 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures performed in 34 patients using a minor papilla approach between April 2007 and March 2012. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical profiles of the patients, the endoscopic interventions, short-term outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS: Of 44 ERCPs, 26 were diagnostic ERCP, and 18 were therapeutic ERCP. The most common cause of difficult access to the main pancreatic duct through the major papilla was pancreas divisum followed by distortion of Wirsung’s duct. The overall success rate of minor papilla cannulation was 80% (35/44), which was significantly improved by wire-guided cannulation (P = 0.04). Endoscopic minor papillotomy (EMP) was performed in 17 of 34 patients (50%) using a needle-knife (13/17) or a pull-type papillotome (4/17). EMP with pancreatic stent placement, which was the main therapeutic option for patients with chronic pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and pancreatic pseudocyst, resulted in short-term clinical improvement in 83% of patients. Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred as an early complication in 2 cases (4.5%).

CONCLUSION: The endoscopic minor papilla approach is technically feasible, safe, and effective when the procedure is performed in a high-volume referral center by experienced endoscopists.

Endoscopic Approach via the Minor Papilla for the Treatment of Pancreatic Stones

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We aimed to evaluate whether the advanced techniques have influenced the minor papilla approach.

METHODS

We studied the success rate of guide wire insertion by using ordinary techniques and advanced techniques (rendezvous method and precut method) in 30 patients via the minor papilla. We compared the selection of the access routes between before (52 patients) and after (28 patients) the introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever.

RESULTS

In 19 out of 30 patients (63%), guide wire insertion via the minor papilla could be achieved by using ordinary techniques. In total, the guide wire could be inserted in 27 patients (90%) by using the advanced techniques. Before introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever, the major papilla approach was chosen in 38 cases (73%), and the minor papilla approach in 14 cases (27%). After introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever, the major papilla approach was used in 26 cases (93%) and the minor papilla in 2 cases (7%). The frequency of selecting the minor papilla approach has significantly decreased (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The advanced techniques have contributed to the improvement of endoscopic approaches via the minor papilla, and decreased the frequency of selecting the minor papilla approach.

The role of endoscopy in the therapy of chronic pancreatitis

Almost all the therapeutic efforts in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis are directed towards pain control. Endoscopic techniques available for this purpose are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (combined or not with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) and endoscopic ultrasound. Pancreatic stones and strictures, pancreatic pseudocysts, and common bile duct strictures complicating chronic pancreatitis can be treated by endoscopy. The development of endoscopic ultrasound extended the possibilities in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts and main pancreatic duct drainage. Endoscopy is considered the first-line treatment in chronic pancreatitis and can be useful also as a 'bridge to surgery'. In fact the endoscopic approach to chronic pancreatitis can predict the response to surgical therapy as a definitive treatment. Medical, endoscopic and surgical methods for the management of chronic pancreatitis should all be considered in decision-making, and the best treatment should be chosen case by case and according to the local expertise.

[Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy: when and how]

Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has fallen into disuse for some time because of the risk of severe complications. More recently, EPS has been advocated as an effective treatment modality for several pancreatic disorders, including severe chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst, ampulloma, pancreas divisum, and pancreatic sphincter dysfunction. Favorable outcomes in patients undergoing EPS to facilitate further interventions, in whom long-term follow-up was available, was 70%; complications occurred in 14% and reintervention was required in 23%. The results were as good as those of surgery after long-term follow-up. Patients who underwent some form of pancreatic drainage after sphincterotomy had fewer complications (p = 0.03). Approximately 75% of patients with pancreas divisum who presented with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis improved after endoscopic therapy, but only 25% of patients experienced pain reduction of at least 50%. The National Institutes of Health Consensus recommends EPS in patients with type I sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). In patients with type II SOD, prior manometry should be performed. In our series of 17 patients, we obtained results similar to those of other studies, although the number of patients was small. EPS appears to be a safe and effective technique, but further, well-designed, multicenter, prospective and long-term studies are required to evaluate these results and settle current controversies.