Formulas for calculating the depth of insertion for the upper and lower esophageal sphincters

Simple Formula for pH/Impedance Probe Positioning in Children-Time to Update Standard Practice?

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel formula for pH probe placement with adequate accuracy.

METHODS

Children (3-18 y) undergoing pH-metry were prospectively evaluated. Their height and corrected pH probe position under X-ray (2 vertebrae above the diaphragm) was recorded and the linear-regression analysis was performed to derive a novel formula. Its accuracy was checked on an additional group of prospectively included children. The success rate of a newly developed formula was estimated and compared to the performance of previously used formulae. The difference in the suggested placement of the probe (cm from nostrils) was calculated.

RESULTS

Based on 670 children with pH probe placed under X-ray, the following formula was developed using the linear-regression analysis: L = 0.184x + 4.4 (cm) (L = probe placement depth, x = body height). Its accuracy was confirmed on additional 111 children resulting in almost 85% success rate. The formula showed significant difference in the suggested placement from formulae used previously: +4.9 ± 0.8 cm, +2.4 ± 0.1 cm, +0.7 ± 0.6 cm, +1.1 ± 0.4 cm, +1.8 ± 0.3 cm, +2.2 ± 0.5 cm from the one by the Strobel, Moreau, Wilson, Nowak, Staiano-Clouse formulae, and the GOSH table with the calculated success rates of 1.8%, 43.2%, 65.8%, 77.5%, 65.8% and 54.1%, respectively. A table suggesting placement depth based on the body height was developed.

CONCLUSION

The present formula provides 85% success of pH probe placement in children ≥ 3 y suggesting its use in routine practice. More data are needed to confirm that probe adjustment under X-ray is unnecessary.

How Best to Estimate Insertion Length of Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance pH Probes in Children

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of the KidZ Health Castle formula (KHC-F) to determine the correct probe position of a multichannel intraluminal impedance pH.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 222 children between 1 month and 18 years of age undergoing multichannel intraluminal impedance pH. The primary outcome was the comparison of the pH sensor location determined by the KHC-F with the radiological target position. The margin of error was defined as 1 cm from the target position. Performance of the KHC-F and existing formulas was determined via the percentage with a correct position, mean error, 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plots), and Spearman correlation. A post hoc analysis was performed with an updated KHC-F v2, subtracting -0.5 cm from the KHC-F.

RESULTS

Positioning with KHC-F was correct in two-thirds of the participants, with a very strong correlation (ρ = 0.91) with the target position. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between KHC-F and target position (mean error of -0.44 cm, lower limit -3.2 cm, upper limit 2.3 cm). A post hoc analysis with the KHC-F v2 showed a correct positioning in 74% of patients. Comparison with other formulas showed a stronger performance of KHC-F and KHC-F v2 on correct positioning, mean error, and 95% limits of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The KHC-F leads to reliable results. KHC-F v2 outperforms all other existing formulas in children, thereby reducing the need for repositioning and the amount of x-ray exposure. The age distribution of the sample may be a limitation, as well as the retrospective nature of the study.