Delayed hemorrhage following "hot biopsy" of a diminutive colonic polyp

Cold or Hot Snare with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 6-9 mm Colorectal Polyps: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR) for colorectal polyps with diameters of 6-9 mm. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 485 patients with colorectal polyps (6-9 mm in size) who were treated with CS-EMR or HS-EMR in the endoscopy center of Hangzhou Third People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. Colorectal polyps were lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline. The CS-EMR group used a cold snare to remove the lifting polyps, while the HS-EMR group used a hot snare. Propensity score matching analysis with 1:1 matching and the nearest neighbor matching method were performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of the CS-EMR and HS-EMR groups. Matching factors included age, gender, body mass index, blood routine, coagulation indicators, polyp site, size, number, and morphology. This resulted in a balanced cohort of 128 patients per group. Polyp recovery, complications, clipping for disclosure, and length of hospital stay were compared after matching. t-Tests, χ² tests, McNemar's tests, and Fisher's exact test were used for comparison between the two groups before and after matching. Results: There were no differences between the two groups of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding (P > .05), but the CS-EMR clipping rate was lower than the HS-EMR group (P < .01). There was a higher incidence of post-polypectomy syndrome (PPS) (P = .03) and longer hospital stays (P < .01) in the HS-EMR group than the CS-EMR group. Conclusions: Compared with HS-EMR, CS-EMR is more convenient to operate, with a low incidence of PPS, clipping rates, and short hospital stays. It is a safe and effective removal method for 6-9 mm colorectal polyps.

The diminutive colon polyp: biopsy, snare, leave alone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diminutive polyps, measuring between 1 and 5 mm, represent the vast majority of colorectal polyps encountered during screening colonoscopy. Although the chance of harboring advanced adenoma or neoplastic cells is low, ensuring a complete polyp resection with clear margins is crucial to reduce the risk of interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the different methods applied for polypectomy of diminutive polyps and clarify whether a diminutive polyp should be retrieved or left in place.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cold biopsy polypectomy is indicated for resection of polyps measuring 1-3 mm and removal of 4-5 mm polyps should be ensured by cold snare polypectomy. Over the last decade, hot biopsy polypectomy has been gradually abandoned because of an increased risk of diathermic injury. The resect and discard strategy and the diagnose and disregard strategy should be performed only by expert endoscopists, who should use validated scales and document the polyp features by storing several endoscopic images.

SUMMARY

Nowadays, complete resection of diminutive polyps, following the most appropriate technique, is recommended in clinical practice. The resect and discard strategy and the diagnose and disregard strategy should be reserved to expert endoscopists.

A blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization and conventional snare polypectomy for diminutive colonic polypectomy in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Although linked with perforation, serositis, delayed bleeding, and incomplete resection, hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization (HBF) is still widely used for diminutive colonic polypectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of HBF in comparison with conventional snare polypectomy (CSP).

DESIGN

Randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic endoscopy unit.

SUBJECTS

Ten swine.

INTERVENTION

Eighty-two paired polypectomies (41 HBF, 41 CSP) of small, minimally elevated, artificial lesions. Standardized technique using coagulating current at 25 W. HBF: the tissue was avulsed after 1 to 2 seconds of current caused blanching of the artificial pedicle. CSP: the polyp was removed by snare diathermy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Histopathology of resected specimens and polypectomy sites in colectomy specimens at necropsy (lateral mucosal and depth of ulceration, necrosis and inflammation).

RESULTS

Some (21%) of the HBF specimens were ablated and uninterpretable. All CSP specimens yielded interpretable specimens. Mucosal necrosis adjacent to HBF resection sites varied widely, between 1.5 and 9 mm (mean 5.7 mm, standard deviation ± 2). There was visible mucosa under the HBF ulcer in 14% of cases. The depth of necrosis in the colon wall was significantly different between the two techniques, with partial muscularis propria (MP) necrosis in 14 of 41 lesions (34%) with HBF, compared with 1 of 41 (2%) of CSP (P < .001), and full-thickness MP necrosis in 9 of 41 lesions (22%) with HBF, compared with 1 of 41 (2%) of CSP (P = .014). There was full-thickness MP inflammation in 13 of 41 lesions (32%) with HBF compared with 5 of 41 (12%) of CSP (P = .06). Transmural subserosal inflammation was seen in 13 of 41 lesions (32%) with HBF compared with 4 of 41 (10%) of CSP (P = .027). There was no relationship between visible lateral mucosal injury and depth of injury (rs = -0.07).

LIMITATIONS

Animal study.

CONCLUSION

Despite use of the standardized HBF technique, there is a wide range of lateral mucosal and deep thermal injury as well as residual target mucosa. HBF also results in a significantly greater depth of tissue injury, with a high proportion of transmural necrosis. Ensuring minimal blanching of the mucosa during the procedure does not protect from deep injury. In comparison to conventional snare polypectomy, HBF is imprecise, potentially ineffective, and hazardous.

Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques

Colonoscopy is considered the 'gold standard' for detection and removal of premalignant lesions in the colon. However, studies suggest that colonoscopy is less protective for right-sided than for left-sided colorectal cancer. Optimizing the effectiveness of colonoscopy is a continuous process, and during the past decade several important quality indicators have been defined that can be used to measure the performance of colonoscopy and to identify areas for quality improvement. The quality of bowel preparation can be enhanced by split-dose regimens, which are superior to single-dose regimens. Cecal intubation rates should approximate 95% and can be optimized by good technique. In selected patients, specific devices can be used to facilitate cecal intubation. Adenoma detection rates should be monitored and exceed a minimum of 25% in men and 15% in women. To this aim, optimal withdrawal technique and adequate time for inspection are of utmost importance. Of all advanced imaging techniques, chromoendoscopy is the only technique with proven benefit for adenoma detection. Finally, the technique of polypectomy affects the number of complications as well as the success of completely removing a lesion. In this Review, we provide an overview of both standard and novel colonoscopy techniques and their impact on quality indicators.

Management of gastrointestinal bleeding induced by gastrointestinal endoscopy

Therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy has a much greater risk of inducing gastrointestinal hemorrhage than diagnostic endoscopy. For example, colonoscopic polypectomy has a risk of approximately 1.6% of inducing bleeding, compared with a risk of approximately 0.02% for diagnostic colonoscopy. Higher-risk procedures include colonoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, endoscopic dilatation, endoscopic variceal therapy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and endoscopic sharp foreign body retrieval. The risk of inducing hemorrhage is decreased by meticulous endoscopic technique. Hemorrhage from endoscopy may be immediate or delayed. Immediate hemorrhage should be immediately treated by endoscopic hemostatic therapy, including injection therapy, thermocoagulation, or electrocoagulation. Delayed hemorrhage generally requires repeat endoscopy for diagnosis and for therapy, using the same hemostatic techniques.

Eletrocirurgia: sistemas mono e bipolar em cirurgia videolaparoscópica

O conhecimento das leis físicas e dos mecanismos de funcionamento da eletrocirurgia são de grande importância para o cirurgião. Lesões por eletrocirurgia em laparoscopia têm sido observadas, e estão associadas ao uso do eletrodo monopolar, com freqüência de 1 a 2 lesões a cada 1000 procedimentos.Com relação ao desenvolvimento de lesão, existem vários fatores que influenciam: densidade da corrente; o tipo de onda e de coagulação usadas, com suas respectivas voltagens; as condições de isolamento dos dispositivos; a ocorrência do fenômeno de capacitância; e os riscos oferecidos pelo uso em pacientes com marcapasso. No sistema bipolar, a densidade de corrente encontrada ao redor de seus eletrodos é bem menor, levando a menos lesões e, ainda, elimina vários dos outros mecanismos lesivos, como a placa de retorno e os citados acima. Vários estudos demonstram, em colecistectomias, apendicectomias, polipectomias e outros, que o índice de complicações com o eletrodo bipolar é significativamente menor.

Therapeutic intervention for nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage

The choice of therapeutic endoscopic technique depends on the training and equipment available to the endoscopist. If the technique is properly performed, the results are similar using injection, thermal coagulation, or laser therapy. We recommended that pediatric endoscopists concentrate on one thermal and one injection technique, since individual bleeding lesions may be more amenable to one method than another based on their anatomic location or briskness of bleeding.

Randomized controlled study of injury in the canine right colon from simultaneous biopsy and coagulation with different hot biopsy forceps

BACKGROUND

Monopolar hot biopsy forceps (HBF), bipolar HBF, and cold biopsy forceps (CBF) followed by bipolar electrocoagulation are used clinically to simultaneously perform a biopsy and coagulate diminutive colon polyps and angiomata. Our purpose was to conduct a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the safety of these different techniques in the canine right colon.

METHODS

After right colotomy in 8 mongrel dogs, colonic mucosa was grasped en face, tented, and biopsy performed in randomized order. The dogs were sacrificed after nine days and the biopsy sites were identified and histologically examined.

RESULTS

Monopolar HBF caused an overall mean rate of acute serosal whitening of 29% compared with 0% for bipolar HBF and CBF and 6% for CBF/bipolar probe. Histologically confirmed transmural injury 9 days after biopsy occurred in 44% of monopolar HBF compared with 5% of bipolar HBF, 0% of CBF, and 50% of CBF/bipolar probe.

CONCLUSIONS

Monopolar HBF had significantly higher rates of acute serosal whitening and histologic transmural damage than bipolar HBF or cold biopsy alone. On the basis of these results, monopolar HBF should be avoided for coagulation of small or flat right colon lesions such as diminutive polyps or angiomata.