Enteroscopy for unexplained iron-deficiency anemia: take enough biopsies

Small bowel endoscopy and coeliac disease

Coeliac disease (CD) is a gluten-responsive, chronic inflammatory enteropathy that shares many features with classical autoimmune diseases. Coeliac disease affects about 1-2% of Caucasians, North Africans and Asians who possess the necessary susceptibility genes encoding HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8. It is not only unique among the autoimmune diseases in that the precise trigger (gluten from wheat, rye and barley) has been identified, but also in that it has lent itself well to advancements in endoscopic imaging. Since its introduction, flexible endoscopy has allowed tissue to be collected from the small bowel with relative ease and safety, and recently has facilitated direct imaging and sampling of the entire small intestine. It is now fifty years since the Crosby capsule first allowed clinicians the ability to non-surgically biopsy the small bowel leading to an enhanced diagnosis of coeliac disease. The introduction of wireless video capsule endoscopy (VCE), small bowel enteroscopy and in particular double balloon enteroscopy (DBE), have expedited the accurate diagnosis of coeliac disease and its more serious complications such as small bowel adenocarcinoma, refractory coeliac disease type II (RCDII) and enteropathy associated T cell lymphoma (EATL).

Making the diagnosis of coeliac disease: is there a role for push enteroscopy?

BACKGROUND

Push enteroscopy is used in the assessment of refractory coeliac disease. However, its value in making the diagnosis of coeliac disease is still not defined.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients (22 females, nine males) were recruited prospectively between September 2001 and October 2002; the age range was 20-80 years (mean age, 52.7 years). All patients had symptoms suggestive of coeliac disease and positive serology but duodenal biopsy was not diagnostic. Twenty-three patients had positive IgA or/and IgG antigliadin antibodies, eight patients had positive endomysial antibodies (EMA). All patients underwent enteroscopy with repeat quadrantic duodenal and additional jejunal biopsies.

RESULTS

All samples were reviewed by a single, blinded, histopathologist. There were no cases of coeliac disease diagnosed on further biopsy in patients who had a positive gliadin antibody in isolation. In the eight EMA-positive cases repeat biopsy demonstrated coeliac disease in five patients. In 3/5 cases the changes were confined to the jejunal biopsies only.

CONCLUSION

EMA-positive patients with initially normal histology should have a further duodenal biopsy. In our series three of the five newly diagnosed coeliac disease patients only had villous atrophy demonstrable in the jejunum. There may be a role for push enteroscopy in making the diagnosis of coeliac disease. However, further prospective studies are needed.

Push enteroscopy in celiac sprue and refractory sprue

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine in patients with sprue whether jejunal endoscopy improves the diagnostic yield or provides information that may modify management, when compared with evaluation limited to the duodenum.

METHODS

From January 1994 to June 1998, a total of 31 patients (6 men, 25 women, mean age 41 years) were prospectively evaluated by push enteroscopy. They were divided into two groups: (1) celiac disease at different stages of activity (n = 23) and (2) refractory sprue (n = 8). The endoscopic and histologic findings in the duodenum and in the jejunum were compared.

RESULTS

Celiac disease: In 19 patients, endoscopic and histologic findings in the duodenum and jejunum were similar; in four patients villous atrophy was more severe in the duodenum than in the jejunum. Refractory sprue: In 5 of 8 patients, enteroscopy revealed ulcerative jejunitis, whereas ulcerations were found in the duodenum in only one case.

CONCLUSION

In refractory sprue, push enteroscopy with jejunal biopsies was of diagnostic value in 50% of cases demonstrating ulcerative jejunitis, whereas it did not modify the management of patients with responsive celiac disease.

Clinical enteroscopy

We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield of push enteroscopy using either the Olympus SIF 10-LY fiberscope or the SIF-100 video enteroscope in 120 patients suspected of having small-bowel pathology. Insertion beyond the ligament of Treitz, checked by fluoroscopy, ranged from 30 to 150 cm (median 100). The source of bleeding was identified in 25 (41%) of 61 patients referred for gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin; vascular malformations were the most common finding, followed by neoplasias. Of 16 patients with inherited polyposis syndromes, multiple distal duodenal or jejunal hamartomas were diagnosed in five of six with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and multiple duodenal or jejunal adenomas in six of 10 with familial adenomatous polyposis. Overall, isolated vascular malformations were successfully cauterized in three patients, and polypectomy was performed in 12 patients. Endoscopic and histological alterations, in both duodenum and jejunum, were found in 16 of 43 patients with diarrhea and/or malabsorption of unclear origin. The remaining 27 had normal duodenal and jejunal mucosal appearances; six had abnormal histological findings only in the jejunum and one both in the duodenum and in the jejunum. If we take jejunal histology as diagnostic, the sensitivity of duodenal histology was 74% and the specificity was 100%. We conclude that push enteroscopy provides useful diagnostic information and has therapeutic capabilities in patients with small-bowel pathology.