Endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy as curative endoscopic surgery; analysis of 24 cases of early gastric cancer

Cap-EMR Ⅱ

Video 1XXX.

Current indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in Japan

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer is widely accepted and technically considered to have matured in Japan. Its indications have been expanded on the basis of clinical trial results.

Preclinical evaluation of a novel thermally sensitive co-polymer (LiftUp) for endoscopic resection

Introduction: Endoscopic resection techniques can successfully resect large lesions either in "en bloc" fashion or in "piece-meal" technique by using a submucosal injection solution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of a novel injectable, containing thermally sensitive co-polymer from ethylenoxide and propylenoxide (LiftUp) used as submucosal injection solution.Material and methods: We conducted an in vivo animal trial in the porcine model to evaluate the LiftUp gel in a preclinical setting and to study the effectiveness of mucosal lifting and the safety of the new injectable. In seven animals a total of 63 injections and endoscopic resections were carried out in different anatomical locations (esophagus, stomach and rectum). The resection sites were controlled endoscopically one and four weeks after resection and a histopathological evaluation of the resection sites was performed after four weeks.Results: The application of LiftUp was safe and there were no negative effects on wound healing after injection and resection. A major procedural complication rate (defined as perforation and major haemorrhage) of 3.2% was registered, which undercuts the anticipated mean complication rate of 4-8%. Furthermore, there was no necessity of reinjection after the initial submucosal injection in 90.5% and no procedural complications in 98.8%. The histopathological examination of the tissue samples indicated normal wound healing with granulation tissue and epithelialisation.Conclusion: The use of LiftUp as submucosal injection solution was feasible for different endoscopic resection techniques, with high and long-lasting elevation and fewer procedural adverse events than expected at trial planning. The new injectable is a practical advancement over the current state-of-the-art of submucosal injection and could fasten up the resection procedure and make endoscopic 'en bloc' resection safer.

Thermo-sensitive isopentane aerification for mucosal lift during endoscopic resection in animal models (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mucosal lift is critical for successful endoscopic treatment. Normal saline (NS) solution is widely used as the submucosal filler, but its short persistency restricts clinical endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, thermo-sensitive isopentane was introduced for submucosal injection. With a boiling point at 27.8°C, liquid isopentane can be easily applied, and gasification inflation can provide great support for submucosal lifting at body temperature. The feasibility and efficiency of isopentane were evaluated in this study.

METHODS

Porcine stomachs were used for in vitro evaluation. A 37°C water bath was used to mimic body temperature. Compared with NS, isopentane was studied for its lifting performance, including injection dosage, persistence of lifting strength, and efficacy for assisting submucosal dissection. The changes in submucosal tissue were also compared. For in vivo evaluation, rats were used to further compare the differences between isopentane and NS, including lifting efficacy, pathologic effect, and safety.

RESULTS

Compared with NS, the maximum lifting height was achieved with less isopentane (2% NS volume). Longer persistency and faster operation for submucosal dissection were also recorded for isopentane during the in vitro study. Aerification resulted in vacuolization of submucosal connective tissue, which facilitates EMR and postoperative recovery. The same results were confirmed in the rat model. With the same dosage, isopentane produced better mucosal elevation and larger range than NS. According to the histologic examination, no tissue injury was observed with isopentane application.

CONCLUSIONS

As a submucosal injection agent, the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of isopentane has been demonstrated. Thermo-sensitive aerification may be a promising approach to facilitate ESD.

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MUCIN PHENOTYPE CAN PREDICT GASTRIC CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection is still considered an accepted treatment for early gastric cancer for selected cases. Histopathologic criteria for curative endoscopic resection are intramucosal well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, lateral and deep margins free of tumor, no histological ulceration, and no venous or lymphatic embolism. A 5% local recurrence rate has been described even when all the above-mentioned criteria are met. On the other hand, antigen expression by tumoral cells has been related to the biological behavior of several tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether early gastric cancer mucin immunoexpression, p53 and Ki-67, can predict recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection, even when standard histopathologic criteria for curative measures have been attempted.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with early gastric cancer were considered to have been completely resected by endoscopic mucosal resection. Local recurrence occurred in 5/22 (22.7%). Immunohistochemical study was possible in 18 (81.8%) resected specimens. Patients were divided in two groups: those with and those without local recurrence. They were compared across demographic, endoscopic, histologic data, and immunohistochemical factors for MUC2, MUC5a, CD10, p53, and Ki-67.

RESULTS

Mucin immunoexpression allowed a reclassification of gastric adenocarcinoma in intestinal (10), gastric (2), mixed (4), and null phenotypes (2). Mixed phenotype (positive for both MUC2 and MUC5a) was found in 80% of cases in the local recurrence group, while the intestinal type (positive MUC2 and negative MUC5a) was found in 76.9% of cases without local recurrence (P=0.004). Other observed features did not correlate with neoplastic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The mixed phenotype of early gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with a higher probability of local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection.

Endoluminal Instrumentation Is Changing Gastrointestinal Surgery

Advances in endoluminal instrumentation and technology are enabling endoscopists to perform increasingly sophisticated procedures. Indications for these procedures are likely to expand as outcomes studies show they are efficacious and cost-effective. This article highlights several recent advances in endoluminal suturing, dissecting, and ligating and discusses the impact of these advances on the practice of gastrointestinal surgery. Endoluminal suturing offers select patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Devices designed for endoluminal hemostasis and endoscopic mucosal resection can be used effectively for a broader range of applications and are already being used to perform transluminal surgery in animal models; human trials are forthcoming. Gastrointestinal surgeons should support efforts to critically evaluate endoluminal techniques because they have an opportunity to improve care. Surgical residents planning careers in gastrointestinal surgery need to understand endoscopic techniques and consider their training opportunities.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes after Rx or R1 endoscopic resection of superficial gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for gastric superficial lesions. A positive or a nonevaluable margin is considered a noncurative criterion. We aimed to systematically review recurrence, residual disease, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and cancer-related death following Rx/R1 resection of gastric lesions in the absence of other noncurative criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE systematic review and meta-analysis by July 2014.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 31 manuscripts. Definitions and results differed significantly. However, nonevaluable (HMx) and positive horizontal margins (HM1) were associated with 10% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5-15%] and 36% (95% CI 24-48%) rates of recurrence/residual disease, respectively, with an odds ratio of 2.85 (95% CI 1.6-5.8, P<0.01) for HM1 compared with HMx. Nonevaluable (VMx) or positive (VM1) vertical margin was associated with a 43% (95% CI 17-68%) rate of recurrence/residual. VMx/VM1 was associated with a higher risk of recurrence/residual compared with HMx/HM1 (odds ratio 3.76, 95% CI 1.71-6.82, P<0.01). The most common strategy after HMx/HM1 was endoscopic surveillance and retreatment, whereas surgery was recommended after VMx/VM1. No cases of LNM or cancer-related death were noticeable if neither submucosal invasion more than 500 µm nor lymphovascular infiltration was also reported.

CONCLUSION

Rx/R1 resection in the absence of other noncurative criteria does not appear to be a significant risk factor for LNM or cancer-related death. The risk of recurrence/residual disease is higher after HM1 than HMx and higher after VMx/VM1 than HMx/HM1. However, considerable heterogeneity was found in studies. Standard definitions should be created and applied in future studies.

Evaluation of 0.6% sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We have focused on sodium alginate (SA) solution as a potential submucosal injection material for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A previous SA solution had high viscosity and problems such as difficult handling. After its properties were adjusted, SA solution was examined in vitro and its clinical safety was evaluated.

METHODS

With 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (SH) solution as a control, catheter injectability and mucosa-elevating capacity of 0.3-0.8% SA solutions were evaluated. Next, 0.6% SA solution was used for ESD in 10 patients with early gastric cancer in a prospective clinical study.

RESULTS

Compared with 0.4% SH solution, 0.6% SA solution exhibited no significant difference in catheter injectability but significant superiority in mucosa-elevating capacity. In the clinical study, no adverse events were observed in any patient.

CONCLUSION

The safety of 0.6% SA solution as a submucosal injection material was confirmed and it is suggested that its efficacy should be investigated in a larger number of cases.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer.

METHODS

We studied 780 lesions for which endoscopic treatment was indicated according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) criteria or the extended National Cancer Center (NCC) criteria from April 1995 to December 2007. A total of 359 lesions were treated by endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) between April 1995 and March 2003 (EAM group), and 421 lesions were treated by ESD between April 2003 and December 2007 (ESD group). Long-term outcomes (local recurrence rate, overall survival) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 73 months in the EAM group and 65 months in the ESD group. Overall, the local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ESD group (0.2 %, 1/421) than in the EAM group (4.2 %, 15/359) (p < 0.05). For lesions meeting the JGCA criteria, the local recurrence rate was 2.9 % in the EAM group and 0 % in the ESD group (p < 0.05). For lesions meeting the NCC criteria, the local recurrence rate was 12.5 % in the EAM group and 0.6 % in the ESD group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

On long-term follow-up, ESD was associated with a lower rate of local recurrence than EAM for lesions that met the JGCA or the NCC criteria. From the point of view of radical curability, ESD can be recommended for the management of lesions that meet either set of criteria.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumor in a Japanese general hospital

Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is not widely used in large colorectal lesions because of technical difficulty and possible complications. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of ESD for large colorectal neoplasms. Patients and Methods. During the past 5 years, 608 cases of colorectal neoplasm (≧20 mm) were treated by ESD. They were divided into Group A (20–49 mm, 511 cases) and Group B (≧50 mm, 97 cases). Results. The average age, lesion size, and procedure time were 67.4 years, 30.0 mm, and 60.0 min in Group A, and they were 67.1 years, 64.2 mm, and 119.6 min in Group B. En bloc resection rates were 99.2% and 99.0% (P = 0.80), and complication rates were 4.1% and 9.9% (P = 0.03). Complications in Group A consisted of perforation (2.7%), bleeding (1.2%), and ischemic colitis (0.2%). Those in Group B were perforation (8.2%) and bleeding (1.0%). Two cases in Group A and none in Group B required emergency surgery for perforation. Conclusions. There was no difference in efficacy between Groups A and B. Complications were more frequent in Group B, but all perforations in Group B were successfully managed conservatively. ESD can be effective and safe for large colorectal tumors.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the needle knife: its superiority to ESD using the insulation-tipped diathermic knife in physicians intending to master ESD

In the absence of a supervisor, we conducted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures using the needle-knife and insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knives for 516 gastric neoplasms in 443 Japanese patients with the diseases. No significant difference was found between IT knife ESD and needle-knife ESD in en bloc resection rates with tumor-free margins (89.8% and 92.9% for IT knife ESD and needle-knife ESD, respectively) and perforation rates (2.2% and 4.6%, respectively). However, the mean procedure time was significantly (P<0.05) shorter in IT knife ESD than in needle-knife ESD (74 and 88 min, respectively) and reached a plateau after accumulating 120 cases of ESD in both procedures. We required a less number of ESD cases before being proficient at needle-knife ESD than in IT knife ESD (30 cases and 60 cases, respectively). Needle-knife ESD is recommended for physicians who intend to master ESD hereafter.

Novel narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy is widely used in Japan, but still there is no set of consistent guidelines for gastric lesions.

AIMS

To introduce a new narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification and report the accuracy of diagnosis in comparison to underlying histopathology of gastric lesions.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients with early gastric cancer lesions were enrolled into this study. Narrow-band imaging magnifying images were classified into four categories based on abnormal microvascular patterns and irregularities in the superficial glandular structure: fine-network pattern, corkscrew pattern, intra-lobular loop pattern-1 and intra-lobular loop pattern-2. The narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification was compared with the histopathological findings.

RESULTS

Amongst the differentiated-type adenocarcinoma lesions, fine-network pattern, intra-lobular loop pattern-1, intra-lobular loop pattern-2 and corkscrew pattern were observed in 15.7%, 59.6%, 24.2% and 0.5%, respectively. Differentiated-type adenocarcinomas mainly exhibited fine-network pattern or intra-lobular loop pattern. In undifferentiated-type adenocarcinoma lesions, intra-lobular loop pattern-2 and corkscrew pattern were observed in 41.2% and 58.8%, respectively. Therefore, undifferentiated-type adenocarcinomas were all classified as intra-lobular loop pattern-2 and corkscrew pattern. The histopathological types were not equivalent with the narrow-band imaging magnifying classification categories (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The new narrow-band imaging magnifying classification that incorporates the intra-lobular loop pattern may be able to predict the histological subtype of most gastric carcinomas.

Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model

CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established modality for excision of sessile lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Submucosal fluid injection creates a cushion and may prevent thermal injury and perforation. OBJECTIVES: This blind study investigated the performance of three different solutions to create submucosal fluid cushions in porcine stomach. METHODS: Three solutions were injected in the stomach of nine pigs BR1: normal saline solution, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25%. In each pig, submucosal injections with 6 mL per test-solution were performed. One drop of methylene blue was added to all injections for better visualization. The time for the bleb to disappear was recorded. RESULTS: The overall median time of visible submucosal cushion was 37 minutes (range 12-60 min) for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 31 minutes for carboxymethylcellulose (range 10-43 min) and 19 minutes for normal saline solution (range 8-37 min). There was no statistically significant difference neither between normal saline solution and carboxymethylcellulose (P = 0.146) nor carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (P = 0.119) but the median duration of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was significantly longer than normal saline solution (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The length of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose submucosal fluid cushion is longer in comparison with normal saline solution. The median time for carboxymethylcellulose was not longer than normal saline solution. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, in the concentration of 0.25%, may be a durable alternative for submucosal injection.

Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: Current and original devices

Compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is easier to perform and requires less time for treatment. However, EMR has been replaced by ESD, because achieving en bloc resection of specimens > 20 mm in diameter is difficult with EMR. The technique of ESD was introduced to resect large specimens of early gastric cancer in a single piece. ESD can provide precise histological diagnosis and can also reduce the rate of recurrence, but has a high level of technical difficulty, and is consequently associated with a high rate of complications, a need for advanced endoscopic techniques, and a lengthy procedure time. To overcome disadvantages in both EMR and ESD, various advances have been made in submucosal injections, knives, other accessories, and in electrocoagulation systems.

Benefits of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to size and location of gastric neoplasm, compared with conventional mucosal resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To clarify optimal therapeutic strategies for early gastric cancers without vestigial remnant or recurrence, we evaluated the benefits of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) according to tumor size and location.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2007, a total of 328 gastric lesions were treated using conventional EMR, while 572 lesions were treated by ESD. Patients who underwent surgery on the upper gastrointestinal tract before EMR or ESD were excluded from the study. We compared tumor size, location and rates of complete resection, curative resection, postoperative bleeding, perforation and local recurrence between EMR and ESD according to tumor situation.

RESULTS

Overall local complete resection rate (EMR, 64.2%; ESD, 95.1%) and overall curative resection rate (EMR, 59.5%; ESD, 82.7%) were significantly higher in ESD than in EMR. No significant differences were seen in complication rates between EMR and ESD. Local recurrence was detected in 13 lesions (4.0%) of the EMR group during follow up. In contrast, no local recurrence was detected in the ESD group. For lesions 5 mm or less in diameter, complete resection rate in the EMR group was not significantly inferior to that in the ESD group at any location. However, rates were overwhelmingly better in the ESD group than in the EMR group for lesions more than 5 mm in diameter, regardless of location.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that lesions exceeding 5 mm in diameter should be treated by ESD, although a high resection rate is obtained also with EMR for lesions of 5 mm or less in diameter.

Submucosal injection solution for gastrointestinal tract endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have provided new alternatives for minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal adenomas and early-stage cancers that involve a minimum risk of lymph-node metastasis. The use of submucosal injections is essential to the success of these endoscopic resection techniques. The “ideal” submucosal injection solution should provide a sufficiently high submucosal fluid cushion for safe and effective EMRs and ESDs while also preserving lesion tissue for accurate histopathological assessment. In the past, normal saline (NS) solution was commonly used for this purpose, but it is difficult to achieve the proper submucosal elevation and maintain the desired height with NS. Therefore, other safe and effective facilitative submucosal injection solutions have been developed that also take into account relevant cost-benefit considerations. This review examines recent advances in the development of effective submucosal injection solutions for use during endoscopic resections.

Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan

BACKGROUND

EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are now being increasingly used for the treatment of esophageal cancers. However, their efficacies in smaller lesions have not been compared.

OBJECTIVE

For effective use of these methods, we compared the results of ESD and 2 major EMR methods for treating esophageal cancers of <or=20 mm.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A cancer-referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 136 patients with 171 lesions <or=20 mm who presented between January 2002 and October 2007 were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

En bloc and curative resection.

RESULTS

Of the 171 lesions, 168 were squamous-cell carcinoma and 3 were adenocarcinoma. The en bloc resection rates decreased in the order of ESD (100%), EMR using a transparent cap (EMRC) (87%), and 2-channel EMR (71%). However, the differences showed only marginal significance. The curative resection rate of ESD (97%) was significantly higher than those of the other 2 methods. Furthermore, the curative resection rate of EMRC (71%) was significantly higher than that of 2-channel EMR (46%). In lesions <15 mm, the en bloc and curative resection rates were significantly higher for EMRC (100% and 86%, respectively) than 2-channel EMR (86% and 51%, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between the en bloc and curative resection rates of EMRC and ESD. There were no differences in the complication rates.

LIMITATIONS

A single-center, retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD was found to be the best endoscopic resection method, even for smaller esophageal cancers. EMRC would be a good alternative to ESD for lesions <15 mm.

Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid in the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye are usually performed for recognizing adequate tumor-negative lateral margins for successful endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasia. However, chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid has not been used for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid with that of conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye or acetic acid alone.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Social Insurance Funabashi Central Hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven consecutive patients (53 lesions) with early gastric cancer and gastric adenomas who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from April 2006 to July 2007 were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

All the lesions were examined by the endoscopic modalities before ESD, and the resected specimens were analyzed histopathologically.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Two endoscopists independently evaluated the diagnostic performance of each image in terms of recognition of tumor borders with reference to macroscopic and histopathologic findings of resected specimens. We also conducted a substudy to assess interobserver variability.

RESULTS

There was good interobserver agreement between the 2 endoscopists in this study (kappa index = 0.764). The diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid was significantly greater than that of any of the other modalities (vs each: P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid was better compared with conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy by using only indigo carmine dye or acetic acid. The applicability of this method for gastric neoplasia merits further investigation.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy for superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

EMR is now a widely accepted option for the treatment for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). However, studies of medium-term to long-term outcomes are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes in patients with SEC who are undergoing medium-term to long-term follow-up after endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy (EOAM).

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study.

SETTING

Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

From November 1999 to October 2005, 85 patients with SEC underwent EOAM. All tumors were macroscopically classified as the superficial type on the basis of preoperative endoscopic and EUS findings. Patients were followed-up, with an endoscopy every 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Therapeutic efficacy, complications, and follow-up results.

RESULTS

The rate of complete resection was 82.5% (70/85). In patients who underwent an incomplete resection, argon plasma coagulation and heat probe coagulation were, in addition, performed. The median longest diameter of the resected specimens was 25 mm. The median time required for a resection was 27 minutes. There was no perforation. Bleeding after an EOAM occurred in 1 patient (1.2%). Esophageal stenosis developed in 8 patients (9.4%). All strictures were managed by endoscopic balloon dilation, and symptoms improved. The median follow-up period after EMR was 36 months (range 6-72 months). Local recurrence occurred in 5 patients (5.9%); the nonrecurrence rate was 96.4% at 1 year, 95.0% at 2 years, and 93.4% at 3 years. As additional treatment, argon plasma coagulation was performed in 4 patients, and endoscopic mucosal dissection was conducted in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

EOAM is a safe, easy, and effective procedure for the treatment of SEC that can be completed within a short time. The rate of local recurrence is low on medium-term to long-term follow-up.

Treatment of gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy by endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife (IT-ESD) for the treatment of patients with gastric remnant cancer.

METHODS: Thirty-two patients with early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach, who underwent distal gastrectomy due to gastric carcinoma, were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or ESD at Sumitomo Besshi Hospital and Shikoku Cancer Center in the 10-year period from January 1998 to December 2007, including 17 patients treated with IT-ESD. Retrospectively, patient backgrounds, the one-piece resection rate, complete resection (CR) rate, operation time, bleeding rate, and perforation rate were compared between patients treated with conventional EMR and those treated with IT-ESD.

RESULTS: The CR rate (40% in the EMR group vs 82% in the IT-ESD group) was significantly higher in the IT-ESD group than in the EMR group; however, the operation time was significantly longer for the IT-ESD group (57.6 ± 31.9 min vs 21.1 ± 12.2 min). No significant differences were found in the rate of underlying cardiopulmonary disease (IT-ESD group, 12% vs EMR group, 13%), one-piece resection rate (100% vs 73%), bleeding rate (18% vs 6.7%), and perforation rate (0% vs 0%) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: IT-ESD appears to be an effective treatment for gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy because of its high CR rate. It is useful for histological confirmation of successful treatment. The long-term outcome needs to be evaluated in the future.

Submucosal glycerol injection-assisted laser surgical treatment of oral lesions

Recently, we modified laser surgery for superficial lesions in the oral cavity by using submucosal glycerol injection. This procedure was based on a technique for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the modified laser surgery assisted by a submucosal glycerol injection. Eleven superficial oral lesions in ten patients were treated with diode laser (continuous wave mode, 3 W) after a submucosal injection of glycerol solution. Injection of glycerol solution created mucosal expansion, which enabled the procedures to be done without bleeding, over cutting, over coagulation and unintended irradiation. The surface of the wounds showed little carbonization, resulting in good healing. Submucosal glycerol injection for laser treatment in the oral cavity is a promising technique for treating superficial oral lesions by virtue of less invasion and good results.

Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection over conventional endoscopic mucosal resection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established method for treating intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection has predominantly been performed using strip biopsy, but local recurrence sometimes occurs due to such piecemeal resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection has recently been performed in Japan using new devices such as an insulation-tip diathermic knife. The efficacy and problems associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection were evaluated by comparison with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for 48 lesions from January 1999 to October 2002, and endoscopic submucosal dissection for 59 lesions from November 2002 to June 2005. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed using an insulation-tip diathermic knife and flex and hook knives, as appropriate.

RESULTS

For lesions >or=11 mm in size, en bloc resection rates were significantly higher with endoscopic submucosal dissection than with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, but treatment time was significantly longer. En bloc resection rates were higher with endoscopic submucosal dissection than with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in all areas. Treatment of lesions in the upper one-third of the stomach took a long time using endoscopic submucosal dissection, and intraoperative bleeding was frequent. However, en bloc resection rates and intraoperative bleeding with endoscopic submucosal dissection were improved using various knives.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection can take a long time, but is superior to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for treating intramucosal gastric neoplasms.

Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In EMR of early gastric cancer (EGC), en bloc resection reduces the risk of residual cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) now allows en bloc resection of large EGCs.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively determine whether ESD is more advantageous than EMR for EGCs.

DESIGN

EMR (825 lesions, 711 patients) or ESD (195 lesions, 185 patients) was performed. The en bloc resection rate, histologically complete resection rate, operation time, complications, and local recurrence rate were studied in relation to ulceration.

SETTING

Hiroshima University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Subjects comprised 896 patients in whom 1020 EGCs were resected endoscopically from 1990 to 2004.

RESULTS

In cases without ulceration, en bloc and histologically complete resection rates were significantly higher with ESD than with EMR, regardless of tumor size. The frequency of ulceration did not differ significantly between groups. Average operation time was significantly longer for ESD than for EMR, regardless of tumor size. Also, regardless of ulceration, the incidence of intraoperative bleeding was significantly higher with ESD (22.6%) than with EMR (7.6%). Delayed bleeding did not differ. In cases with ulceration, the incidence of perforation was significantly higher with ESD (53.8%) than with EMR (2.9%). Local recurrences were treated by incomplete EMR (en bloc, 2.9%; piecemeal, 4.4%). No patient experienced recurrence after ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD increased en bloc and histologically complete resection rates and may reduce the local recurrence rate. Increased operation time and complication risks with ESD in comparison with EMR remain problematic. Special measures are necessary for ESD of ulcerated lesions to reduce the rates of perforation and incomplete resection.

Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer with a novel 2-channel prelooped hood

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC) such as a soft prelooped hood is a useful, effective, and safe technique. One problem with this method is that the lesion cannot always be maintained in the center of the cap because the procedure is performed blindly after aspiration.

OBJECTIVE

We developed a 2-channel prelooped hood that facilitates EMRC while simultaneously allowing both grip of the center in the lesion and irrigation of the aspiration site and evaluated the usefulness of this end hood for early gastric cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Between August 2003 and October 2004, patients underwent our novel EMR.

PATIENTS

Twelve cases of early gastric cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Two side holes were fabricated by drilling in the cap portion of a conventional soft prelooped hood, and then the irrigation tube and the accessory channel tube were glued to the exterior surface of the holes. We placed the fabricated transparent hood at the tip of the endoscope and performed grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Accurate aspiration and the rate of en bloc resection.

RESULTS

We obtained a satisfactory field of view and accurate aspiration in the center of the tumor in all lesions. The rate of en bloc resection was 91.7% (11/12).

LIMITATIONS

Gastric intramucosal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection with a novel 2-channel prelooped hood is safe and useful for mucosal resection of intramucosal cancers less than 20 mm and may help center the lesion in the cap before resection.

Endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap-fitted endoscope improves tissue resection and pathology interpretation: an animal study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap-fitted endoscope (EMRC) has been proposed to be significantly better and safer for tissue resection compared with standard snare EMR. However, there are no valid animal or clinical data to support this. We aimed to compare EMRC with standard snare EMR in a porcine model with respect to tissue resected, ease of procedure, and degree of diathermic injury to the resected specimen.

METHODS

Gastric EMRs were randomly performed in pigs using a variety of techniques, including EMRC (1mm and 17-mm cap) and the standard snare technique, using a single-channel method without a grasping forceps. Geometric and histological assessment of the resection specimen for size, histological depth, and diathermic injury were performed by a single pathologist, blinded to the endoscopic techniques used.

RESULTS

Thirty-six gastric mucosal resections were randomly performed in three pigs. Use of EMRC resulted in a statistically significant greater resection specimen by weight, size, and histological depth compared with standard EMR (P < 0.04). Large-cap EMRC resulted in a statistically significant greater resection weight and size compared to small-cap EMRC (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant greater degree of diathermic injury in the specimens resected using the standard snare EMR technique compared with EMRC (P < 0.006). There were no acute complications with either technique.

CONCLUSION

Gastric EMRC is more technically effective than and as safe and easy as standard snare EMR. Use of the cap, especially the larger cap, is associated with larger and deeper mucosal resection and less diathermic injury compared with the standard snare technique, making the pathologic assessment of depth and margin involvement more reliable. When possible, EMRC should be the EMR method of choice.

Safety of Argon Plasma Coagulation for Hemostasis During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Showing the safety of argon plasma coagulation (APC) over mucosal defects during/after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 2 studies using resected pig (ex vivo) and living minipig (in vivo) stomachs were performed. As an ex vivo study, APC was applied over mucosal defects in 2 groups; with prior submucosal saline injection and without injection. Only subtle tissue damage was observed in the injection group, whereas apparent damage was observed in the noninjection group. The damaged distances in depth significantly increased as the pulse duration increased and those at the pulse duration of 4 seconds, which might be maximal in clinical practice, were approximately 1 mm. As an in vivo study, APC was applied over mucosal defects immediately after EMR. Only subtle tissue damage was observed even at the pulse duration of 20 seconds as shown in the ex vivo study. APC can be performed safely over the mucosal defects during/after EMR.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Lateral Spreading Tumors of the Colon Using a Novel Solution

Lateral spreading tumors (LSTs) of the colon are lesions over 10 mm in diameter that are low in height and grow superficially. They are increasingly being diagnosed in Western cohorts. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of dextrose 50% solution in the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of LSTs. The study population consisted of 21 patients with LSTs of the colorectum. The mean size of the LSTs was 23.52+/-13.60 mm. Dextrose 50% solution was injected, via a variceal needle, into the submucosa to lift up the LST sufficiently from the proper muscle layer. Subsequently, a snare was positioned around the lesion and then closed while being pressed against the mucosa, with suction being applied to draw the lesion into the snare. Blended current was used for resection. If necessary, a piecemeal technique was used to achieve complete resection. Immediate and delayed complications were recorded. After the EMR, patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months or later, using total colonoscopy. Endoscopic resection was completed in all LSTs. Of the 21 LSTs, 15 (71.4%) were resected en bloc and 6 (28.6%) piecemeal. The mean amount of injected dextrose 50% solution was 14.86+/-9.13 mL. One patient (4.78%) had immediate bleeding after EMR, which was stopped endoscopically. Histologic examination of resected LSTs showed adenoma with high-grade dysplasia 9 (42.9%), adenoma with low-grade dysplasia 10 (47.6%), and invasive carcinoma 2 (9.5%). Twenty patients were followed up for 37.9+/-24.03 months. Local recurrent disease was detected in 4 patients (20%), all within 6 months of the index EMR. These recurrent lesions were completely resected endoscopically. The contribution of submucosal injection of dextrose 50% is significant for a safe and efficient EMR of LSTs of the colorectum.

Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection

AIM

To clarify the risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

METHODS

A total of 297 consecutive patients who underwent EMR were enrolled. Some of the patients had multiple lesions. Bleeding requiring endoscopic treatment was defined as bleeding after EMR. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), calculated by logistic regression with multivariate adjustments for covariates, were the measures of association.

RESULTS

Of the 297 patients, 57 (19.2%) patients with bleeding after EMR were confirmed. With multivariate adjustment, the cutting method of EMR, diameter, and endoscopic pattern of the tumor were associated with the risk of bleeding after EMR. The multivariate-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR using endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy was 3.07 (95%CI, 1.59-5.92) compared with strip biopsy. The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for the highest quartile (16-50 mm) of tumor diameter was 5.63 (95%CI, 1.84-17.23) compared with that for the lowest (4-7 mm). The multiple-adjusted OR for bleeding after EMR for depressed type of tumor was 4.21 (95%CI, 1.75-10.10) compared with elevated type.

CONCLUSION

It is important to take tumor characteristics (tumor size and endoscopic pattern) and cutting method of EMR into consideration in predicting bleeding after EMR.

Endoscopic mucosal resection

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a promising therapeutic option for removal of superficial carcinomas or premalignant lesions throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This review discusses indications and the several techniques of EMR in early tumors of esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colon. EMR is not yet widely utilized in the West. However, great benefits may be obtained from this non-invasive technique after an accurate evaluation of patients and a careful staging of lesions that may assess the depth of infiltration and exclude the presence of lymph node metastases. EMR permits a complete removal of the lesion with histologic assessment of the entire specimen and the change in the pathologic stage in a significant number of patients. To minimize the risk of serious complications (mostly bleeding and perforation), only experienced endoscopists should undertake EMR in an appropriate environment. Data from literature are encouraging on the use of EMR, but a long-term follow-up of a large number of patients is necessary to confirm the effectiveness of this therapy.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) using an endoscopy, namely, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been adopted for about 20 years, but the effectiveness and the safety of the modality are still controversial. The quality of these trials has not been assessed systematically.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness and the safety of EMR with gastrectomy for the treatment of EGC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2005) MEDLINE (1966 to March 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2005), CINAHL (1985-March 2005) and CBM (Chinese BioMedical Database 1982 -2002). Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of EGC patients involving a treatment arm of EMR and a comparison arm of gastrectomy were to be included, but no RCTs were found.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers (YP Wang, C Bennett and T Pan) independently assessed the eligibility of potential trials and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

There are no included randomised control trials for the systematic review. Available evidence derived from non-randomised controlled trials is discussed in the main text of this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of randomised controlled trials in which EMR is compared with gastrectomy for EGC. There is a need for well designed randomised controlled trials to determine the effects of EMR compared to gastrectomy.

Endoscopic therapy of lower gastrointestinal cancer

Since the 1960's, endoscopy has revolutionised the practice of gastroenterology. Although initially diagnostic, endoscopy is now playing an increasingly therapeutic role. There are many reasons to believe that therapeutic endoscopy will shape the practice of gastroenterology further in the future. Only a few years ago we relied on low-resolution fibreoptic endoscopes. Nowadays even standard equipment allows the mucosa to be scrutinised in great detail. Dedicated training in endoscopy together with attention to quality indicators such as polyp detection and caecal intubation rates will ensure that fewer early gastrointestinal cancers are missed in the future. Open access endoscopy and screening programs are being introduced in many Western countries which will also lead to more lesions being detected in their early stages. This chapter discusses the main issues surrounding the endoscopic therapy of lower gastrointestinal cancers.

Tissue damage of different submucosal injection solutions for EMR

BACKGROUND

When choosing submucosal injection solutions for EMR, tissue damage should be considered, as well as the lesion-lifting ability. The objective of the study was to find out the potential tissue damage of submucosal injection solutions.

METHODS

The submucosal injection solutions examined were the following: normal saline solution (NS), 3.75% NaCl, 20% and 50% dextrose water (DW), a glycerin solution (Glyceol; 10% glycerin with 0.9% NaCl plus 5% fructose), and two hyaluronic acid (HA) solutions (0.25% 1900 kDa/NS solution and 0.125% 1900 kDa/ Glyceol solution). Furthermore, DW with different concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 30%, 40%) also was examined to find out the tolerable concentration without tissue damage. A total of 2 mL of each solution per stomach were injected by endoscopy into the submucosal layer at the separate sites of 4 living minipigs. Two minipigs were euthanized after 30 minutes of endoscopic observations, and the others were euthanized after additional endoscopic observations a week after injection.

RESULTS

There was no apparent tissue damage in NS, 5% and 10% DW, Glyceol, or two solutions of HA, whereas, hypertonic solutions, except Glyceol and 10% DW, have more or less potency of tissue damage. In 3.75% NaCl and DW with concentrations of >or=20%, considerable tissue damage was observed, which might affect resected EMR specimens and ulcer healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of hypertonic solutions except Glyceol is not recommended with respect to tissue damage. A combination of HA and Glyceol is the most favorable submucosal injection solution, considering tissue damage and lesion-lifting ability.

Pneumoscrotum: A rare manifestation of perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy

Pneumoscrotum is uncommon and also rarely reported as a complication associated with colonic perforation. A case of colonic perforation in delayed fashion associated with EMR, revealed by pneumoscrotum, is reported and the associated literatures are reviewed. A 52-year-old male received piecemeal EMR for a laterally spreading tumor 35 mm in size in our hospital. He complained of enlargement of the scrotum and revisited our hospital the day after the procedure. A diagnosis of pneumoscrotum was made, and as most such cases have been reported to be associated with pneumoperitoneum, colonic perforation was suspected. Free air but no fluid collection was found by abdominal computed tomography, and delayed colonic perforation was diagnosed. However, as there were no clinical signs of peritoneal irritation, conservative treatment was administered and the patient recovered uneventfully. Pneumoscrotum could be a sign of colonic perforation after EMR, and treatment should be carefully chosen.

Endoscopic mucosal resection: treatment of neoplasia

Techniques of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can dramatically improve the ability to diagnose and treat superficial lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Early cancers, submucosal tumors, and sessile polyps can be safely and completely removed in a single procedure, with long-term outcome results comparable to surgery. This is accomplished with a minimum cost, morbidity, and mortality and with little or no impact on the quality of life of patients. This article provides an overview of the techniques, indications, and outcomes of EMR in the management of GI malignancy.

Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR

BACKGROUND

EMR traditionally is performed by using normal saline solution (NS) as the submucosal fluid cushion. It is thought, however, that NS does not maintain the proper mucosal elevation for EMR of large, flat lesions. We investigated the efficacy of glycerol as the submucosal injection solution.

METHODS

A total of 110 colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST) were treated by EMR with glycerol. For comparison, 113 LSTs treated by using NS were studied. The en bloc resection, complete resection, and associated complications rates were evaluated retrospectively.

OBSERVATIONS

The en bloc resection rate in the glycerol group was 63.6% (70/110) compared with 48.9% (55/113) in the NS group (p < 0.05). The complete resection rate in the glycerol group was 45.5% (50/110) compared with 24.6% (28/113) in the NS group (p < 0.01). The associated complications rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It technically was easier and as safe to perform EMR of colorectal LSTs when using glycerol as the submucosal injection solution.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Esophageal Applications

Endoscopic mucosal resection is an invaluable tool to diagnose and potentially treat superficial cancers in Barrett's esophagus as well as squamous cell cancers. The technique can be performed using equipment available in most endoscopic laboratories. The tissue retrieved from these procedures gives the endoscopist histologic information regarding tumor depth of penetration, which is critical to treatment of early cancers. In addition, standard pinch biopsies are often unable to diagnose malignancies that may underlie areas of dysplasia or even normal mucosa. Endoscopic mucosal resection can be used to diagnose these lesions with relative safety, particularly when applied to the esophagus.

EMR of upper GI lesions when using a novel soft, irrigation, prelooped hood

BACKGROUND

EMR with a cap-fitted endoscope, including a soft, prelooped hood, is a useful, effective, and safe technique. One problem with this method, however, is that the lesion cannot always be kept in the center of the cap because the procedure is performed blindly after aspiration. A soft, prelooped hood with attached irrigation tube was developed. The usefulness of this device for EMR of upper-GI intramucosal cancers was evaluated.

METHODS

The end-hood piece was fabricated by drilling a side hole in the cap portion of a conventional soft, prelooped hood and then attaching an irrigation tube with glue to the exterior surface of the hole. The fabricated transparent hood was placed at the tip of an endoscope, and aspiration mucosectomy under irrigation was performed in 15 patients with upper-GI intramucosal cancer. When the field of view at the aspiration site was obscured by oozing blood, the site was irrigated.

RESULTS

A satisfactory view was obtained of all lesions. The mean diameter of specimens was 24.5 mm (interquartile range: 15-35). The proportion of en bloc resected lesions was 86.7% (13/15). Bleeding was the only complication (4/15; 26.7%) and was controlled by using endoscopic hemostatic techniques under irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR when using the soft, prelooped hood with irrigation tube is effective and safe for intramucosal cancers 20 mm or less in diameter.

Usefulness of EMR with an oblique aspiration mucosectomy device compared with strip biopsy in patients with superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

EMR is now widely accepted as a treatment option for superficial esophageal cancer. Endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy with an oblique aspiration mucosectomy device was performed, and the results were compared retrospectively with those of conventional strip biopsy.

METHODS

Strip biopsy (April 1991 through October 1999) or endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy (November 1999 through December 2002) was performed in a consecutive series of patients with superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Variables assessed were size of resection specimens, rate of complete resection, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the consecutive series of 66 patients with superficial esophageal cancer, 27 underwent strip biopsy and 39 had endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and lesion macroscopic appearance. The endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy group had a significantly greater mean depth of tumor invasion and had significantly more large lesions vs. the strip biopsy group. The mean longest diameter of resection specimens was significantly greater with endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy (23.9 [5.2] mm) than with strip biopsy (15.2 [4.9] mm) (p<0.001). The en bloc resection rate was 33.3% (9/27) in the strip biopsy group and 46.2% (18/39) in the endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy group (p=0.322). Despite larger lesion size in the endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy group, the complete resection rate was similar between the strip biopsy (70.4%) and endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy (74.4%) groups (p=0.783). The complete resection rate for lesions 30 mm or greater in diameter was slightly but not significantly higher in the endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy group (84.4%) compared with the strip biopsy group (70.4%) (p>0.999). With respect to complications, the rates of bleeding and submucosal hematoma were similar. Esophageal stenosis occurred after the procedure in 3 patients in the endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy group. All were managed by endoscopic dilation, and symptoms improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic oblique aspiration mucosectomy is safe and effective for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

A variety of different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the upper GI tract have been described that are more effective than strip biopsy. However, there is no report of a prospective randomized comparison of different techniques.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized study, 100 consecutive endoscopic resections were performed in 72 patients with early stage esophageal cancer. Fifty endoscopic resections were performed with a "suck-and-ligate" device without prior submucosa injection and 50 with the cap technique with prior submucosa injection of a dilute saline solution of epinephrine. The main assessment criteria were maximum diameter of the resection specimen and of the resection area, and the complication rate.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to the maximum diameters and calculated area of the resected specimens (ligation group: 16.4 [4.0] x 11 [3.1] mm/185 [84] mm(2) vs. cap group: 15.5 [4.1] x 10.7 [2.7] mm/168 [83] mm(2)), or the maximum diameters and calculated area of the endoscopic resection ulcers after 24 hours (ligation group: 20.6 [4.8] x 14.3 [4.5] mm/314 [160] mm(2) vs. cap group: 18.9 [5.1] x 12.9 [3.8] mm/260 [145] mm(2)). There was only a slight advantage (greater diameter of resection specimens) for the ligation group in patients who had prior endoscopic treatment. There was one minor episode of bleeding in each group; there was no severe complication. In 41 of 72 patients (57%), further endoscopic therapy after endoscopic resection was necessary because of residual neoplasia at the first follow-up endoscopy after resection (61 of 100 resection specimens [61%] had lateral margins that could not be evaluated because of coagulation artifact or contained malignancy but with the base of the lesion free of tumor).

CONCLUSIONS

The cap technique with submucosa injection and the ligation technique without submucosa injection are similar with respect to efficacy and safety for endoscopic resection of early stage esophageal cancers.

Endoscopic closure of perforations caused by EMR in the stomach by application of metallic clips

BACKGROUND

The number of complications associated with use of EMR for early-stage gastric cancer, including perforation, has increased with the increasing use of this procedure. Endoscopic clip application was performed in patients who sustained a perforation as a result of EMR for gastric neoplasm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven patients who underwent endoscopic application of metallic clips to close perforations were studied. The omental patch method was applied in one case with a large perforation.

OBSERVATIONS

In all patients, endoscopic clip application successfully closed the perforation of the stomach, which occurred after EMR. No patient required laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of endoscopic clip application might be useful for treatment of patients who sustain a perforation caused by EMR.

Predictors of bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric tumors

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection has been increasingly used to treat gastric tumors. Bleeding is the major complication of endoscopic mucosal resection. This study evaluated risk factors for bleeding associated with endoscopic mucosal resection.

METHODS

Four hundred seventy-seven patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric tumors during the past 10 years were studied retrospectively. Bleeding encountered during endoscopic mucosal resection was termed immediate; bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection was termed delayed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for determination of the factors related to delayed bleeding. One case of perforation was excluded.

RESULTS

Delayed bleeding occurred in 25 (5.3%) of 476 patients. The only factor found to be significantly different between cases with and without delayed bleeding was the occurrence of immediate bleeding during endoscopic mucosal resection (p < 0.001). Sites where immediate bleeding occurred were not the same as those where delayed bleeding arose. There were no significant differences in other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

When immediate bleeding occurs during endoscopic mucosal resection, there is an increased risk of delayed bleeding.

Barrett's Esophagus: Ablative Endoscopic Techniques

Barrett's esophagus consists of a precancerous condition in which the progression from dysplasia to adenocarcinoma is now well documented. The management of patients affected by Barrett's esophagus is still debatable, in particular for the risk of surgical treatment in the presence of small precancerous lesions or early adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, quality of life after surgical resection is often poor. Endoscopy is the main diagnostic and follow-up procedure in Barrett's esophagus: it allows the detection and treatment of severe dysplasia and invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic treatment also produces reduction or disappearance of intestinal metaplasia. In these cases, the aim of the treatment is to prevent dysplastic changes. Moreover, the ideal endoscopic treatment should be safe, easy to perform and cost effective. Thermal (electrocoagulation, laser, argon-plasma coagulation), photochemical (photodynamic therapy) or ablative (endoscopic mucosal resection) procedures have been proposed alone or in combination, with the aim to completely eradicate dysplastic lesions or early adenocarcinoma as an alternative to surgical treatment. Endoscopic removal of the lesions is followed by restoration of normal epithelium. Some questions about patient selection, prevention of recurrence and best endoscopic treatment still remain unanswered.