Unsuspected celiac disease diagnosed by endoscopic visualization of duodenal bulb micronodules

Scalloping is a reliable endoscopic marker for celiac disease

BACKGROUND

Scalloping of duodenal folds noted on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been associated with various illnesses including celiac disease (CD). The aim of the present study was to examine the frequency of scalloping in pediatric patients undergoing EGD and to assess its significance in the diagnosis of CD. We also evaluated the association of scalloping with the histopathology and celiac serology in the subgroup of celiac patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All children (0-18 years) who underwent EGD at Shaare Zedek Medical Center for any reason during a 2.5-year period were retrospectively included, yielding a consecutive cohort without selection bias. Relevant data were obtained from the patient files.

RESULTS

During the study period, 623 children underwent EGD of whom 149 (24%) were eventually diagnosed with CD. In 74/623children (12%), scalloping was seen and had a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 0.40-0.57), specificity of 99% (0.98-0.99) and positive predictive value of 97% (0.9-0.99) to diagnose CD. The prevalence of scalloping increased with advancing stage of the Marsh classification from 33% (7/21) in Marsh 1 to 63% (34/54) in Marsh 3c (P < 0.001). Scalloping was associated with a significantly higher median tissue transglutaminase level (153 [IQR 98-168] versus 49 [IQR 11-143]; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the diagnosis of CD is almost certain if isolated scalloping is observed during EGD done to rule out CD. Thus, attention to this finding may serve as an additional tool in the diagnosis of CD.

Endoscopic tools for the diagnosis and evaluation of celiac disease

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disease of the small bowel induced by ingestion of wheat, rye and barley. Current guidelines indicate histological analysis on at least four duodenal biopsies as the only way to diagnose CD. These indications are based on the conception of the inability of standard endoscopy to make diagnosis of CD and/or to drive biopsy sampling. Over the last years, technology development of endoscopic devices has greatly ameliorated the accuracy of macroscopic evaluation of duodenal villous pattern, increasing the diagnostic power of endoscopy of CD. The aim of this paper is to review the new endoscopic tools and procedures proved to be useful in the diagnosis of CD, such as chromoendoscopy, Fujinon Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy, Narrow Band Imaging, Optical Coherence Tomography, Water-Immersion Technique, confocal laser endomicroscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, capsule endoscopy and I-Scan technology.

The importance of disease prevalence in assessing the diagnostic value of a test: endoscopic markers in celiac disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the diagnostic variability and reproducibility of endoscopic signs in two populations with a different pretest likelihood of celiac disease (CD).

METHODS

We recruited 289 CD patients (both adults and children) in a multicenter prospective study. Group 1 (high risk) included 111 patients referred for positive serology. Group 2 (low risk) included 178 unselected patients. Mosaic pattern, reduction/loss of Kerckring's folds, scalloping of the valvulae conniventes and a nodular pattern were the endoscopic findings looked for in the duodenum.

RESULTS

In group 1, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of endoscopic findings were 100, 84.6, 94.2 and 100% in adults, and 86.8, 9.1, 82.1 and 12.5% in children. In group 2, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of endoscopic findings were 33.3, 91.4, 7.7 and 98.5% in adults, and noncalculable, 78.3, 0.0 and 100% in children. Comparing group 1 and group 2, there was a statistically significant difference in sensitivity and PPV in adults, and in specificity, PPV and NPV in children. Concerning the reproducibility of endoscopic findings, a wide variability of κ values was found.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic signs have low reproducibility for CD, and their diagnostic value in selecting patients for multiple intestinal biopsies is unacceptable, especially in populations with low disease prevalence.

Duodenal bulb biopsies for diagnosing adult celiac disease: is there an optimal biopsy site?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies highlight the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a targeted duodenal bulb biopsy in addition to distal duodenal biopsies is the optimal strategy to identify villous atrophy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-seven patients undergoing clinically indicated EGD with duodenal biopsies were recruited. Of these, 28 had newly diagnosed celiac disease and 49 were controls.

INTERVENTIONS

At endoscopy, 8 duodenal biopsy specimens were taken: 4 from the second part of the duodenum and 4 quadrantically from the bulb (at the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-o'clock positions).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Increasing the diagnostic yield and detection of the most severe villous atrophy in celiac disease with the addition of a targeted duodenal bulb biopsy.

RESULTS

The most severe degree of villous atrophy was detected when distal duodenal biopsy specimens were taken in addition to a duodenal bulb biopsy specimen from either the 9- or 12-o'clock position (96.4% sensitivity; 95% CI, 79.7%-100%). The difference between the 12-o'clock position biopsy and the 3-o'clock position biopsy in detecting the most severe villous atrophy was 92% (24/26) versus 65% (17/26) (P = .02).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and study performed in a tertiary referral center.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the patchy appearance of villous atrophy that occurs within the duodenum. A targeted duodenal bulb biopsy from either the 9- or 12-o'clock position in addition to distal duodenal biopsies may improve diagnostic yields by detecting the most severe villous atrophy within the duodenum.

Bulb biopsies for the diagnosis of celiac disease in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CD) is a gluten-dependent enteropathy. The current standard for diagnosing CD involves obtaining 4 biopsy samples from the descending duodenum. It has been suggested that duodenal bulb biopsies may also be useful.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of bulbar biopsies for the diagnosis of CD in pediatric patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Single center.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven consecutively enrolled pediatric patients with celiac serologies and a clinical suspicion of CD.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent EGD, and 4 biopsy samples were obtained from the duodenal bulb and 4 from the descending duodenum of each child.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The pathologist blindly reported the Marsh histological grade for the diagnosis of CD of the bulb and descending duodenum.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of CD was histologically confirmed in 89.4% (42/47) of the cases of biopsy samples obtained from the descending duodenum and in all 47 obtained from the bulb. In 35 patients (74.5%), histology was the same in the bulb and duodenum; in 11 (23.4%) cases, the grade of atrophy was higher in the bulb than in the descending duodenum, and 5 (10.6%) had bulb histology positive for CD but negative duodenal findings. One child (2.1%) had a higher histological grade in the duodenum than in the bulb. The diagnostic gain with bulbar biopsies was 10.6%.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and absence of a comparison group (asymptomatic children with normal CD antibodies).

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest examining 4 biopsy samples from the duodenal bulb and 4 from the descending duodenum to improve diagnostic accuracy of CD.

Optical coherence tomography in pediatric patients: a feasible technique for diagnosing celiac disease in children with villous atrophy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Celiac disease is a common condition with many atypical manifestations, where histology serves as the "gold standard" for diagnosis. A useful new technique, optical coherence tomography, can depict villous morphology in detail, using light waves. This study examined the correlation between the sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography in pediatric patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy for the diagnosis of celiac disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 134 children were prospectively enrolled, 67 with a serological suspicion of celiac disease (group 1) and 67 with negative histology for celiac disease (group 2). During a diagnostic esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy we acquired multiple images and films in the four quadrants of the second part of the duodenum, and biopsies were taken in the area where optical coherence tomography had been done. Three patterns of villous morphology were considered: pattern 1=no atrophy (types 0, 1 or 2 of the Marsh classification); pattern 2=mild atrophy (type 3a or 3b); pattern 3=marked atrophy (type 3c).

RESULTS

The diagnosis of celiac disease was histologically confirmed in all 67 children with positive antiendomysium and/or antitransglutaminase antibodies. Optical coherence tomography correlated with pattern 1 histology in 11/11 cases, pattern 2 in 30/32 (93.8%) and pattern 3 in 22/24 (91.6%). Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 100%. In the control group there was 100% concordance between optical coherence tomography and histology. The overall concordance between optical coherence tomography and histology in determining patchy lesions was 75%.

CONCLUSION

Optical coherence tomography could be a helpful diagnostic tool in children with mild or marked villous atrophy for diagnosing celiac disease during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, avoiding biopsies. However, duodenal biopsies are mandatory if the optical coherence tomography shows normal villous morphology in patients with positive antibodies.

Capsule endoscopy findings in celiac disease

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a noninvasive imaging method used to evaluate intestinal mucosa. We aimed to examine intestinal mucosal changes in celiac disease (CD) with CE. Eight untreated patients who had anti-endomysial antibody-positive duodenal biopsy results consistent with CD were included in the study. Villous atrophy, scalloping, fissuring, and mosaic pattern (consistent with CD) were detected in seven patients; one patient was excluded for early meal consumption. No patchy involvement was found in the intestine or distal region of the intestine (ileum) in any of the patients. The common feature of all patients was that villous atrophy, scalloping, fissuring, and mosaic patterns detected in the proximal intestine gradually decreased towards the distal intestine. CE provided no diagnostic contribution to CD when compared with duodenal biopsy. It can be used to show villous atrophy in selected cases and to evaluate the extension of intestinal involvement in CD.

Emerging technologies in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and celiac disease

Despite advances in our knowledge of celiac disease, the most current and authoritative recommendations conclude that diagnosis requires at least four biopsy specimens to be taken from the duodenal area. These recommendations are based on the perception that classic endoscopic markers are not adequate to target biopsy sampling to sites of villous damage in the duodenum. In the past few years, newly developed procedures and technologies have improved endoscopic recognition of the duodenum. These advances make possible the real-time recognition of the duodenal villous pattern during an upper endoscopy procedure, and thereby have the potential to optimize diagnostic accuracy. It is, therefore, reasonable to hypothesize that upper endoscopy might have a more incisive role in the diagnosis of celiac disease than merely providing a means of obtaining biopsy specimens for histological analysis. This Review highlights the new technologies in the field of upper endoscopy that could be helpful for the diagnosis of celiac disease, including the water-immersion technique, chromoendoscopy, high-resolution magnification endoscopy, optimal band imaging, optical coherence tomography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Pilot study on the correlation of optical coherence tomography with histology in celiac disease and normal subjects

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Celiac disease (CD) is a common condition but often it goes unrecognized because characteristic histopathological abnormalities must be found to confirm the diagnosis. A way is needed to select patients who need biopsy of the duodenal mucosa to detect CD. No data are currently available on the use of in vivo optical coherence tomography (OCT), during real-time endoscopic imaging, in the small intestine and, particularly, in the diagnosis of CD. The aim of the present study was to test the utility of OCT in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for histological diagnosis.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with suspected CD (positive for antigliadin, antiendomysial and antitransglutaminase antibodies) and 22 dyspeptic subjects (negative for these antibodies) who were also examined by EGD, were prospectively enrolled. OCT scans of descending duodenum were taken during diagnostic EGD, with biopsies of the same duodenal area. OCT images and histological specimens were evaluated blindly, analysis being done independently by a gastroenterologist and a pathologist. Three patterns of intestinal villous morphology were considered (1, no atrophy; 2, mild atrophy; 3, marked atrophy).

RESULTS

Concordance was total between OCT and histology for villi morphology in both patients and normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT appears to be a promising method for correctly identifying villous atrophy; it may help in selecting patients for intestinal biopsies, considering the limited usefulness of endoscopic criteria, and may also help the endoscopist to perform target biopsies in mucosal areas where the villi are damaged or absent, considering that CD often causes patchy mucosal lesions.

Correlation of clinical and histopathological with endoscopic findings of celiac disease in the Turkish population

Endoscopic findings have been described for the diagnosis of celiac disease but the relationship among the clinical presentation, endoscopic markers, and the degree of histopathological findings is not clear. Thirty patients who were thought to have celiac disease were included in this study. Biopsies taken from the duodenum were examined histopathologically. The relationship among the endoscopic, clinical, and histopathological findings were investigated. Partial villous atrophy was seen in 14 patients (46.6%), and subtotal and total villous atrophy were seen in 6 (20%) patients each. Eighty six percent of patients with a mosaic appearance, 76% of patients with the finding of loss of folds, and 90% of patients with scalloping on endoscopy had either partial villous atrophy, subtotal villous atrophy, or total villous atrophy on biopsy. We conclude that endoscopic findings in celiac disease can reveal valuable information both for diagnosis and for demonstration of the severity of the disease state.

Endoscopy in celiac disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary objective of this review is to highlight the evidence for the role of endoscopy in celiac disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence is presented that the endoscopic markers of celiac disease are specific although not sensitive for the disease. Villous atrophy, the hallmark of celiac disease, is patchy in the duodenum, and various techniques may identify areas of villous atrophy. These methods include magnification endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. The most recent innovation, video capsule endoscopy, may be of value in the diagnosis of celiac disease and in the assessment of patients with complicated celiac disease.

SUMMARY

Endoscopy and duodenal biopsies are the mainstay for diagnosing celiac disease. Although characteristic endoscopic features may be useful, their absence does not exclude celiac disease. Random biopsy, even of normal-appearing mucosa is necessary for the diagnosis of celiac disease.

Defining a proper setting for endoscopy in coeliac disease

OBJECTIVE

As it has been demonstrated that a careful duodenal inspection during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy may be useful in predicting coeliac disease, we tried to define the usefulness of endoscopy in detecting unsuspected coeliac patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We considered all the first diagnoses of coeliac disease from 1992 to 2001, i.e. 110 patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of coeliac disease. From 1992 to 1997, neither of the endoscopists paid careful attention to the endoscopic features of coeliac disease in the course of the examinations performed for indications other than coeliac disease. From 1998 to 2001, the same endoscopists looked very carefully at these endoscopic features, regardless of the indication for the procedure.

RESULTS

Over the first period, 22/16,081 patients endoscoped for the first time had a histological diagnosis of coeliac disease, with a prevalence of 1/731. In all 22 patients the indication for the examination was the suspicion of coeliac disease. The endoscopic appearance of the duodenum was indicative in 16/22 (72.7%) patients. Over the second period, the diagnosis of coeliac disease was made in 88/10,410 patients endoscoped for the first time. The prevalence of the disease was 1/118 examinations performed. The endoscopic appearance of the duodenum was indicative in 70/88 (79.5%) patients. In 13/88 patients, the diagnosis of coeliac disease was presumed because of the macroscopic appearance of duodenum, lacking a past history suggestive of coeliac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a still open controversy on the accuracy of endoscopic markers in the diagnosis of coeliac disease, we have found that in subjects not suspected for coeliac disease and undergoing an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for other reasons, attention to the endoscopic pattern could facilitate the identification of a relevant number of cases.

Magnifying endoscopy of the duodenum with dye scattering method in a case with celiac disease

AIM: To know the more detailed findings of the small intestinal mucosa with the use of a magnifying endoscope and a vital dye, and the efficacy of the both tools. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 54-year old female patient with celiac disease. The duodenal mucosa downward as far as the descending portion was observed with a magnifying endoscope (Olympus GIF HM) before and after spraying the mucosa with 0.1% indigo carmine. RESULTS: The endoscopy clarified the atrophy and edema of each villus, and scattering of the dye revealed shorter villi with the relatively longer villi remaining in islands. CONCLUSION: The combination of magnifying endoscopy and the dye scattering method is useful for closer observation of the intestinal mucosa in celiac diseases.

The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease

OBJECTIVES

Celiac disease (CD) is characterized by small intestinal inflammation and mucosal atrophy. Endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are reported to be present in 88-100% of untreated celiac patients. In patients being evaluated for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), we examined whether endoscopic markers could predict histological results consistent with CD.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen patients without histories of CD had small bowel biopsies to evaluate IDA using videoendoscopy. Markers suggesting villous atrophy were noted at endoscopy. Biopsy specimens were reviewed for consistency with CD. Endoscopic and histological findings were compared.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were diagnosed with CD, both clinically and histologically. Loss of folds was the most sensitive marker of villous atrophy, present in 47% with CD, with 97% specificity. The mosaic pattern was much less sensitive (12%), with 100% specificity. Nodularity and scalloping had low sensitivities (6%), but specificities of 95% and 100%, respectively. A finding of any endoscopic marker yielded a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 92% for CD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although endoscopic markers have been guides for directing small bowel biopsies in patients suspected of having CD, we found sensitivities of these markers to be low and conclude that they should not be relied upon for detecting CD in patients presenting with IDA.

Endoscopic markers in adult coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Various endoscopic markers have been described in coeliac disease, particularly in the second part of the duodenum, with minor attention generally being paid to the duodenal bulb.

AIMS

To evaluate, prospectively, the presence of all endoscopic markers in the bulb and the second part of the duodenum on a large series of patients submitted to endoscopy for duodenal biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS. A total of 367 consecutive patients, submitted to endoscopy with duodenal biopsy for various indications, were considered. Biopsies were graded as normal, with partial villous atrophy (mild, moderate, severe) or with subtotal villous atrophy. Endoscopic markers and corresponding locations evaluated were: micronodular pattern [bulb and descending duodenum], mosaic appearance (bulb and descending duodenum), scalloped folds (descending duodenum), reduced or absent folds (descending duodenum).

RESULTS

In 78 patients, a diagnosis of untreated coeliac disease was made. Endoscopic markers were seen in 73/78 patients, with only a single sign present (bulb or descending duodenum) in 12 patients. In the remaining 289 patients, normal histology and normal endoscopic findings were observed, except in two patients with reduced folds. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy regarding all endoscopic markers were 93.6%, 99.3%, 97.3%, 98.3% and 98.1%, respectively

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the usefulness of endoscopic markers in detecting coeliac disease, underlining the importance of evaluating also abnormalities in the bulb and endoscopic single signs; although endoscopy may not detect all cases of coeliac disease, the recognition of endoscopic markers allows the selection for biopsy of unsuspected patients submitted to endoscopy for non-specific symptoms.

Endoscopic features of celiac disease in children

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic abnormalities have been described in adult patients with celiac disease that may suggest the diagnosis, especially when the presentation is atypical.

METHODS

The duodenum of 140 children undergoing EGD for various different indications was evaluated macroscopically and histologically.

RESULTS

Histology revealed total villous atrophy in 80 patients, 79 of whom had celiac disease. Among these, 100% had a mucosal mosaic pattern in the duodenum (sensitivity 98.7%, specificity 96.7%, positive predictive value 97.5%, negative predictive value 98.3%), 70% had scalloped duodenal folds (sensitivity 68.7%, specificity 98.3%, positive predictive value 98.2%, negative predictive value 70.2%), 15% had visible vasculature, and 6% had reduction of duodenal folds. Sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic findings were not modified by chromoendoscopy. Except for the mosaic pattern, the frequency of endoscopic abnormalities increased with age; reduction of duodenal folds was never seen in children with celiac disease who were less than 5 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency and diagnostic value of endoscopic abnormalities are different in children with celiac disease compared with adults with this disease. Because indications for endoscopy, such as abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and unexplained anemia, can be manifestations of celiac disease, and villous atrophy may have a patchy distribution, awareness of these endoscopic abnormalities is important in the diagnosis of celiac disease in children.

Significance of unsuspected celiac disease detected at endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy provides an opportunity to diagnose unsuspected celiac disease.

METHODS

We prospectively identified patients undergoing endoscopy for reasons other than the evaluation of diarrhea or suspected malabsorption, who had endoscopic signs in the duodenum suggestive of celiac disease and in whom villous atrophy was confirmed. Patients were assessed for nutritional deficiencies, reduced bone density, parameters of calcium metabolism, and malignancies.

RESULTS

Nine patients (3 women and 6 men) were identified among 1749 patients undergoing endoscopy between January 1990 and May 1998, representing a rate of unsuspected celiac disease of 1 per 194 endoscopies. The duodenal abnormalities were as follows: reduced or absent folds in 6, scalloped folds in 5, mosaic appearance in 3, and mucosal fissures in 2. Assessment revealed iron deficiency in 5, folate deficiency in 1, osteopenia in 4, osteoporosis in 1, and hypocalciuria in 4. Three had malignancies associated with celiac disease, 2 esophageal squamous carcinomas, and 1 jejunal adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsuspected celiac disease can be diagnosed at endoscopy by recognition of changes in the duodenum. When detected, patients have one or more manifestations of the disease. Celiac disease is more common in the United States than previously considered and endoscopy provides an opportunity to establish the diagnosis.

Usefulness of videoduodenoscopy and vital dye staining as indicators of mucosal atrophy of celiac disease: assessment of interobserver agreement

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to determine the diagnostic usefulness of videoduodenoscopic inspection alone and the addition of vital dye staining in the detection of celiac disease. We additionally sought to evaluate interobserver agreement for specific duodenoscopic markers of mucosal atrophy.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven consecutive subjects who underwent duodenoscopy for intestinal biopsy were included in a prospective controlled study. Endoscopic examination was performed by experienced endoscopists according to a set protocol using methylene blue (1%) dye. All procedures were recorded on videotape, but only 20 (10 with atrophy and 10 normal) were used in a blinded, independent, randomized analysis by five reviewers to evaluate interobserver agreement. Endoscopic signs indicative of mucosal atrophy were as follows: reduction in the number or loss of Kerkring's folds, "scalloped" folds, "mosaic pattern," and visualization of the underlying blood vessels.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients had celiac disease (57 newly diagnosed, 30 when treated). Seven treated patients had nonatrophic mucosa. In 80 patients the final diagnosis excluded celiac disease. Videoendoscopic inspection alone correctly identified 75 of 80 patients with complete mucosal atrophy and 86 of 87 with normal mucosa. False-negative diagnoses occurred in treated celiac patients with mild atrophy. Mosaic pattern (89%) and scalloped folds (86%) were the most useful endoscopic signs. Vital dye staining, as assessed by experienced endoscopists, provided identical results to those obtained by inspection alone. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the presence of one or more than one feature were 94%, 100%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. The agreement (kappa statistics) among observers was excellent for the mosaic pattern (kappa: 0.76 for both the videoendoscopic inspection alone and dye staining) and the scalloped folds (kappa: 0.83 and 0.76, respectively) and was fair (kappa: 0.41 and 0.59, respectively) for the reduction in the number or loss of duodenal folds.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that videoduodenoscopy is useful in the detection of intestinal atrophy. Dye staining produces a better delineation of scalloped folds and mosaic pattern in the atrophic mucosa, but did not provide additional information to the expert endoscopist. Finally, interobserver agreement was excellent for the most prevalent signs.