Endoscopic stent therapy for dominant extrahepatic bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Background and study aims  Dominant strictures (DS) occur in up to 60 % of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Data regarding the long-term effects of stenting vs. dilation remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare the two treatment modalities in terms of transplantation-free survival. Patients and methods  This single-center, retrospective study examined patients with PSC and DS treated endoscopically with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Patients were divided into two cohorts: 1) those who received dilation alone; and 2) those who received both dilation and stenting. The primary outcome was transplantation-free survival, defined as time after index ERCP to liver transplantation. Results  In all, 169 patients (54 in dilation cohort, 115 in stenting cohort) were included. The stenting cohort had a significantly higher Mayo PSC Risk Score (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2) and presented with cholangitis more frequently (22.6 % vs. 1.9 %). During a follow-up period of 1198 person-years, 69 (40.8 %) patients received transplantation at a mean of 3.4 (± 2.9) years. There was no difference in transplantation rate in the stenting cohort [68 (95 % CI 5.2-8.8) per 100 person-years] compared to the dilation cohort [3.7 (95 % CI 2.1-6.0) per 100 person-years] and no difference in risk for transplantation (dilation cohort adjusted hazards ratio 0.67, 95 % CI 0.33-1.32). Conclusions  Despite a higher Mayo Risk Score in the stenting group, there was no difference in transplantation-free survival between patients managed with stenting vs. dilation alone. Stenting, therefore, may offer benefit in patients with advanced PSC and DS.

Role of ERCP in Benign Biliary Strictures

Benign biliary strictures (BBS) can be associated with several causes, with postoperative and inflammatory strictures representing the most common ones. Endoscopy represents nowadays the first-line treatment in the management of BBS. Endoscopic balloon dilatation, plastic stents placement, fully covered metal stent placement, and magnetic compression anastomosis are the endoscopic techniques available for the treatment of BBS. The aim of this study is to perform a review of the literature to assess the role of endoscopy in the management of BBS and to evaluate the application of the different procedures in the different clinical settings.

Predictors of Jaundice Resolution and Survival After Endoscopic Treatment of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

The benefit of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains controversial. To identify predictors of jaundice resolution after ERCP and whether resolution is associated with improved patient outcomes, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 124 patients with jaundice and PSC. These patients underwent endoscopic biliary balloon dilation and/or stent placement at an American tertiary center, with validation in a separate cohort of 102 patients from European centers. Jaundice resolved after ERCP in 52% of patients. Median follow‐up was 4.8 years. Independent predictors of jaundice resolution included older age (P = 0.048; odds ratio [OR], 1.03 for every 1‐year increase), shorter duration of jaundice (P = 0.059; OR, 0.59 for every 1‐year increase), lower Mayo Risk Score (MRS) (P = 0.025; OR, 0.58 for every 1‐point increase), and extrahepatic location of the most advanced biliary stricture (P = 0.011; OR, 3.13). A logistic regression model predicted jaundice resolution with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.5‐0.79) in the validation set. Independent predictors of death or transplant during follow‐up included higher MRS at the time of ERCP (P < 0.0001; hazard ratio [HR], 2.33 for every 1‐point increase), lower total serum bilirubin before ERCP (P = 0.031; HR, 0.91 for every 1 mg/dL increase), and persistence of jaundice after endoscopic therapy (P = 0.003; HR, 2.30). Conclusion: Resolution of jaundice after endoscopic treatment of biliary strictures is associated with longer transplant‐free survival of patients with PSC. The likelihood of resolution is affected by demographic, hepatic, and biliary variables and can be predicted using noninvasive data. These findings may refine the use of ERCP in patients with jaundice with PSC.

Effect of scheduled endoscopic dilatation of dominant strictures on outcome in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVE

Scheduled endoscopic dilatation of dominant strictures (DS) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) might improve outcome relative to endoscopic treatment on demand, but evidence is limited. Since randomisation is difficult in clinical practice, we present a large retrospective study comparing scheduled versus on-demand endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) based on patient preferences.

DESIGN

Between 1987 and 2017, all new patients with PSC had been offered scheduled ERCP with dilatation of a DS if diagnosed; the latter was repeated at defined intervals until morphological resolution, independent of clinical symptoms (treatment group). Patients who refused participation were clinically evaluated annually and received endoscopic treatment only on demand (control group). The primary clinical endpoint was transplantation-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, bacterial cholangitis episodes, hepatic decompensation of liver cirrhosis and endoscopy-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The final study included 286 patients, 133 (46.5%) receiving scheduled ERCP and 153 (53.5%) receiving on-demand ERCP. After a mean follow-up of 9.9 years, the rate of transplantation-free survival was higher in patients receiving scheduled ERCP (51% vs 29.3%; p<0.001), as was transplantation-free survival time (median: 17.9 vs 15.2 years; log-rank: p=0.008). However, the benefit of scheduled ERCP was significant only in patients with the initial (17.1%) or later (45.5%) diagnosis of a DS (17.8 vs 11.1 years; log-rank: p<0.001). IBD (p=0.03), DS (p=0.006), higher Mayo Risk Score (p=0.02) and non-adherence to scheduled endoscopy (p=0.005) were independently associated with transplantation-free survival.

CONCLUSION

In our large retrospective study, regular ERCP with endoscopic balloon dilatation significantly benefits patients with PSC with DS, diagnosed both at initial presentation and during surveillance, even if asymptomatic. Further studies have to find out how to best identify stricture patients non-invasively.

Biliary endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis and its complications

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, idiopathic, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. It can affect individuals of all age groups and gender, has no established pharmacotherapy, and is associated with a variety of neoplastic (e.g. cholangiocarcinoma) and non-neoplastic (e.g. dominant strictures) hepatobiliary complications. Given these considerations, endoscopy plays a major role in the care of patients with PSC. In this review, we discuss and provide updates regarding endoscopic considerations in the management of hepatobiliary manifestations and complications of PSC. Where evidence is limited, we suggest pragmatic approaches based on currently available data and expert opinion.

Stenting for Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures

Benign and malignant biliary strictures are common indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Diagnosis involves high-quality cross-sectional imaging and cholangiography with various endoscopic sampling techniques. Treatment options include placement of plastic biliary stents and self-expanding metal stents, which differ in patency duration and cost effectiveness. Whether the etiology is benign or malignant, a multidisciplinary strategy should be implemented. This article will discuss general principles of biliary stenting in both benign and malignant conditions.

Endoscopic management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare but clinically important cholestatic liver disease. Histopathologically and cholangiographically, PSC is characterized by intra- and/or extra-hepatic bile duct inflammation and fibro-obliteration, which ultimately leads to biliary cirrhosis and related sequelae, including development of hepatobiliary and colorectal carcinomata. PSC can be diagnosed at essentially any age and carries a median survival of 15-20 years, regardless of age at diagnosis, and is a foremost risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma. Given the chronic and progressive nature of PSC, its inherent association with both neoplastic and non-neoplastic biliary tract complications, and the lack of effective pharmacotherapies, alimentary and biliary tract endoscopy plays a major role in the care of patients with PSC. Areas covered: Here, we provide a narrative review on endoscopic management of PSC, including established and evolving applications to the diagnosis and treatment of both its benign and malignant complications. Expert commentary: Due to the rarity of PSC and the considerable patient-years required to rigorously study major endpoints, there remains a paucity of high-quality evidence regarding its management. As the advanced endoscopic repertoire expands, so has the interest in developing best practices in PSC, which we discuss herein.

Update in the Care and Management of Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive cholestatic liver disease for which specific medical therapy is not available. The goals of treatment are primarily early detection and management of complications. In this review, we discuss novel therapies under evaluation and provide the foundation for surveillance strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drugs under investigation include norursodeoxycholic acid, nuclear receptor agonists, anti-fibrotics, antibiotics, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Endoscopic therapy is indicated for symptomatic dominant strictures and in the work-up of malignancies. Recently, the use of stents was associated with an increased rate of complications compared to balloon dilatation; and long-term stenting should be avoided. Malignancies currently account for most of the PSC-related mortality. Many drugs are emerging for the treatment of PSC but liver transplantation is the only treatment modality shown to prolong survival. PSC recurrence occurs in up to 35% of transplanted allografts within a median of 5 years. Surveillance for hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies is indicated.

Dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis: A multicenter survey of clinical definitions and practices

Dominant strictures (DSs) of the biliary tree occur in approximately 50% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and may cause significant morbidity. Nevertheless, the definition and management of DSs lacks consensus. We aimed to better understand current perceptions and practices regarding PSC‐associated DSs. We conducted an anonymous, 23‐question, survey‐based study wherein electronic surveys were distributed to 131 faculty in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the three Mayo Clinic campuses (Rochester, Scottsdale, and Jacksonville) as well as the affiliated practice network. Responses were aggregated and compared, where applicable, to practice guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver. A total of 54 faculty (41.2%) completed the survey, of whom 24 (44.4%) were hepatologists, 21 (38.9%) gastroenterologists, and 9 (16.7%) advanced endoscopists. One of the major study findings was that there was heterogeneity among participants' definition, evaluation, management, and follow‐up of DSs in PSC. The majority of participant responses were in accordance with societal practice guidelines, although considerable variation was noted. Conclusion: Despite the prevalence and morbidity of DSs in PSC, clinical perceptions and practices vary widely among hepatologists, gastroenterologists, and advanced endoscopists who manage these patients, even within a single health care system. Further studies are needed to address these variations, develop general and evidence‐based consensus, and increase adherence to societal guidelines. (Hepatology Communications 2018;2:836‐844)

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: A review and update

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, chronic, cholestatic liver disease of uncertain etiology characterized biochemically by cholestasis and histologically and cholangiographically by fibro-obliterative inflammation of the bile ducts. In a clinically significant proportion of patients, PSC progresses to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and/or hepatobiliary cancer, though the disease course can be highly variable. Despite clinical trials of numerous pharmacotherapies over several decades, safe and effective medical therapy remains to be established. Liver transplantation is an option for select patients with severe complications of PSC, and its outcomes are generally favorable. Periodic surveillance testing for pre- as well as post-transplant patients is a cornerstone of preventive care and health maintenance. Here we provide an overview of PSC including its epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, associated disorders, surveillance, and emerging potential therapies.

Endoscopic Management of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains a rare but potentially devastating chronic, cholestatic liver disease. PSC causes obstruction of intra- and/or extra-hepatic bile ducts by inflammation and fibrosis, leading to biliary obstruction, cirrhosis and portal hypertension with all associated sequelae. The most dreaded consequence of PSC is cholangiocarcinoma, occurring in 10-20% of patients with PSC, and with population-based estimates of a 398-fold increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC compared to the general population. We use the 4-D approach to endoscopic evaluation and management of PSC based on currently available evidence. After laboratory testing with liver chemistries and high-quality cross-sectional imaging with MRCP, the first D is Dominant stricture diagnosis and evaluation. Second, Dilation of strictures found during ERCP is performed using balloon dilation to as many segments as possible. Third, Dysplasia and cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis is performed by separated brushings for conventional cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and consideration for direct cholangioscopy with SpyGlass™. Fourt and finally, Dosing of antibiotics is critical to prevent peri-procedural cholangitis. The aim of this review article is to explore endoscopic tools and techniques for the diagnosis and management of PSC and provide a practical approach for clinicians.

Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Guideline

This guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) on the role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations.

Benign Biliary Strictures

Differentiating benign and malignant biliary strictures is a challenging and important clinical scenario. The typical presentation is indolent and involves elevation of liver enzymes, constitutional symptoms, and obstructive jaundice with or without superimposed or recurrent cholangitis. While overall the most common causes of biliary strictures are malignant, including cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, benign strictures encompass a wide spectrum of etiologies including iatrogenic, autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and congenital. Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating strictures, characterizing their extent, and providing clues to the ultimate source of biliary obstruction. While ultrasound is a good screening tool for biliary ductal dilatation, it is limited by a poor negative predictive value. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is more than 95% sensitive and specific for detecting biliary strictures with the benefit of precise anatomic localization. Other commonly employed imaging modalities include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, and cholangiography. First-line treatment of benign biliary strictures is endoscopic dilation and stenting. In patients with anatomy that precludes endoscopic cannulation, percutaneous biliary drain insertion and balloon dilation is preferred.

Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of benign biliary strictures: What’s new?

Benign biliary strictures comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases. The most common strictures amenable to endoscopic treatment are post-cholecystectomy, post-liver transplantation, related to primary sclerosing cholangitis and to chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures is widely used as first line therapy, since it is effective, safe, noninvasive and repeatable. Endoscopic techniques currently used are dilation, multiple plastic stents insertion and fully covered self-expandable metal stents. The main indication for dilation alone is primary sclerosing cholangitis related strictures. In the vast majority of the remaining cases, temporary placement of multiple plastic stents with/without dilation is considered the treatment of choice. Although this approach is effective, it requires multiple endoscopic sessions due to the short duration of stent patency. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents appear as a good alternative to plastic stents, since they have an increased radial diameter, longer stent patency, easier insertion technique and similar efficacy. Recent advances in endoscopic technique and various devices have allowed successful treatment in most cases. The development of novel endoscopic techniques and devices is still ongoing.

Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis-perspectives from a therapeutic endoscopist

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, cholestatic liver condition characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, and destruction of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. The therapeutic endoscopist plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of PSC. In patients presenting with a cholestatic profile, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is warranted for a definite diagnosis of PSC. Dominant strictures of the bile duct occur in 36%-57% of PSC patients. Endoscopic balloon dilatation with or without stenting have been employed in the management of dominant strictures. In addition, PSC patients are at increased risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma with a 20% lifetime risk. Brush cytology obtained during ERCP and use of fluorescence in situ hybridization forms the initial diagnostic step in the investigation of patients with dominant biliary strictures. Our review aims to summarize the current evidence supporting the role of a therapeutic endoscopist in the management of PSC patients.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that involves progressive destruction of the bile ducts. Its prevalence is 4 to 16 cases per 100,000 persons. Its incidence has risen over the last 20 years, with a more than 35% increase in the last 10 years alone. PSC tends to arise in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. It is associated with an increased risk of various types of cancer (13%-14%), most prominently cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC).

METHOD

This review is based on a selective search in PubMed for original articles, meta-analyses, and review articles about PSC that appeared from January 1980 to May 2013.

RESULTS

The diagnosis is generally established with a bile duct imaging study--typically, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP): this test is more than 80% sensitive and more than 90% specific for the diagnosis of PSC. The time from diagnosis to death or liver transplantation is 12 to 18 years, and the risk that a patient with PSC will die of cancer is 40% to 58%. Options for drug treatment are limited. Randomized, controlled trials have not shown any improvement of outcomes from the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Interventional endoscopy is used to treat dominant stenoses and cholangitis, even though this method of treatment is supported only by low-level evidence. Liver transplantation results in a 10-year survival rate above 80%.

CONCLUSION

There is no causally directed treatment for PSC. Early diagnosis, complication management, and the evaluation of an optimally timed liver transplantation are the main determinants of outcome.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for primary sclerosing cholangitis

Although there are no randomized, controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients, substantial indirect evidence supports the effectiveness of ERC in symptomatic PSC patients with a dominant stricture. Currently, cumulative evidence supports the role of ERC with endoscopic dilation with or without additional short-term stent placement for symptomatic PSC patients with a dominant stricture. Differentiating benign dominant strictures from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains difficult; however, newer endoscopic techniques and advanced cytologic techniques are likely to improve sensitivity for the diagnosis of CCA over that achieved by traditional cytology brushing alone.

Biliary endoprosthesis: a prospective analysis of bacterial colonization and risk factors for sludge formation

Bacterial colonization of biliary stents is one of the driving forces behind sludge formation which may result in stent occlusion. Major focus of the study was to analyze the spectrum and number of microorganisms in relation to the indwelling time of stents and the risk factors for sludge formation. 343 stents were sonicated to optimize the bacterial release from the biofilm and identified by matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF). 2283 bacteria were analyzed in total. The most prevalent microorganisms were Enterococcus species (spp.) (504;22%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (218;10%) and Candida spp. (188;8%). Colonization of the stents mainly began with aerobic gram-positive bacteria (43/49;88%) and Candida spp. (25/49;51%), whereas stents with an indwelling time>60 days(d) showed an almost equal colonization rate by aerobic gram-negative (176/184;96%) and aerobic gram-positive bacteria (183/184;99%) and a high proportion of anaerobes (127/184;69%). Compared to stents without sludge, more Clostridium spp. [(P = 0.02; Odds Ratio (OR): 2.4; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): (1.1-4.9)]) and Staphylococcus spp. [(P = 0.03; OR (95%CI): 4.3 (1.1-16.5)] were cultured from stents with sludge. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant relationship between the number of microorganisms [P<0.01; OR (95%CI): 1.3(1.1-1.5)], the indwelling time [P<0.01; 1-15 d vs. 20-59 d: OR (95%CI): 5.6(1.4-22), 1-15 d vs. 60-3087 d: OR (95% CI): 9.5(2.5-35.7)], the presence of sideholes [P<0.01; OR (95%CI): 3.5(1.6-7.9)] and the occurrence of sludge. Stent occlusion was found in 70/343(20%) stents. In 35% of cases, stent occlusion resulted in a cholangitis or cholestasis. In conclusion, microbial colonization of the stents changed with the indwelling time. Sludge was associated with an altered spectrum and an increasing number of microorganisms, a long indwelling time and the presence of sideholes. Interestingly, stent occlusion did not necessarily lead to a symptomatic biliary obstruction.

Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive inflammation affecting the entire biliary tree and leading to biliary symptoms and complications. It is of unclear etiology and is usually associated with inflammatory bowel diseases. Despite advances in modern medicine, treatment options remain very limited, and without liver transplantation, survival rates are reduced. We aim in this review to highlight available endoscopic methods to evaluate, diagnose, and manage symptoms and complications associated with this disease, including diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma and endoscopic palliative treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma not amenable to surgical resection.

Advanced therapeutic endoscopist and inflammatory bowel disease: Dawn of a new role

Endoscopy plays a key role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Colonoscopy has been traditionally used in the diagnosis of IBD and helps in determination of an important end point in patient management, “mucosal healing”. However, the involvement of an advanced endoscopist has expanded with innovations in therapeutic and newer imaging techniques. Endoscopists are increasingly being involved in the management of anastomotic and small bowel strictures in these patients. The advent of balloon enteroscopy has helped us access areas not deemed possible in the past for dilations. An advanced endoscopist also plays an integral part in managing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications including management of pouch strictures and sinuses. The use of rectal endoscopic ultrasound has been expanded for imaging of perianal fistulae in patients with Crohn’s disease and appears much more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging and exam under anesthesia. Advanced endoscopists also play an integral part in detection of dysplasia by employing advanced imaging techniques. In fact the paradigm for neoplasia surveillance in IBD is rapidly evolving with advancements in endoscopic imaging technology with pancolonic chromoendoscopy becoming the main imaging modality for neoplasia surveillance in IBD patients in most institutions. Advanced endoscopists are also called upon to diagnose primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and also offer options for endoscopic management of strictures through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In addition, PSC patients are at increased risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma with a 20% lifetime risk. Brush cytology obtained during ERCP and use of fluorescence in situ hybridization which assesses the presence of chromosomal aneuploidy (abnormality in chromosome number) are established initial diagnostic techniques in the investigation of patients with biliary strictures. Thus advanced endoscopists play an integral part in the management of IBD patients and our article aims to summarize the current evidence which supports this role and calls for developing and training a new breed of interventionalists who specialize in the management of IBD patients and complications specific to those patients.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the pediatric population is safe and efficacious

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is increasingly being used in the evaluation and management of biliary and pancreatic disorders in children. The aim of this study was to review the pediatric ERCP experience of a large academic referral center affiliated with a tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of medical records, endoscopic and operative reports, and radiography of those patients ages 0 to 21 years who underwent ERCP for any indication between 1993 and 2011 at a tertiary referral center affiliated with a large urban pediatric hospital. ERCP technical success was defined as cannulation of the desired duct. Serious adverse events included bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, or death.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-nine ERCPs were performed on 296 patients. The mean age was 14.9 ± 4.8 years (3 months-21 years); 51.1% were boys. Patients with a history of previous liver transplant comprised 13.1% (56) of all ERCPs. Abnormal liver chemistries or suspected choledocholithiasis accounted for half of the indications. A therapeutic intervention was performed in 64.1%. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of ERCPs. Serious adverse events occurred in 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric ERCP is highly efficacious in the pediatric population, with the rates of technical success and use of therapeutic interventions mirroring those in adults. There is a low overall rate of serious adverse events. The overall efficacy and safety support the performance of pediatric ERCP by experienced endoscopists at high-volume centers.

Biliary stent therapy for dominant strictures in patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis

The diagnosis and the treatment of dominant strictures (DS) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is challenging and the scientific literature on the subject is quite limited. Only level II and level III evidence is available to guide physicians managing patients with DS and PSC. For the diagnosis, intraductal endoscopic ultrasound is the most sensitive (64%) and specific (95%) test. However, the majority of cases require a combination of several different diagnostic tests, as there is no single investigation that can rule out malignancy in this group of patients. For the treatment, serial endoscopic or percutaneous dilatations provide 1- and 3-year biliary duct patency in 80 and 60% of patients, respectively. Dilatation and stenting are the most common interventions, although the optimal duration of treatment has still not been clearly defined. Bile duct resection and/or bilioenteric bypass are currently indicated only for patients with preserved liver function. For all other patients, benign DS can be treated with endoscopic dilatation with short-term stenting. This approach is effective and safe and does not increase the risk of malignant transformation or complications for liver transplant candidates. During the last decade, the use of self-expandable metallic stents for benign diseases has become an innovative option. The aim of this article is to review the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients affected by PSC and DS with specific emphasis on the outcomes of patients treated with temporary stents.

Endoscopic management of benign bile duct strictures

The use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treating benign biliary strictures has become the standard of practice, with surgery and percutaneous therapy reserved for selected patients. The gold-standard endoscopic therapy is dilation of the stricture followed by placing and exchanging progressively larger and more numerable plastic stents over a 1-year period. Newer modalities, including the use of fully covered metal stents, are currently under investigation in an effort to improve the treatment of benign biliary strictures.

Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first-line management in most situations when a benign biliary stricture is suspected. Although management principles are similar in all subgroups, the anticipated response rates, need for ancillary medical and endoscopic approaches, and use of less proven strategies vary between differing causes. Exclusion of malignancy should always be a focus of management. Newer endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound, cholangioscopy, confocal endomicroscopy, and metal biliary stenting are increasingly complementing traditional ERCP techniques in achieving long-term sustained stricture resolution. Surgery remains a definitive management alternative when a prolonged trial of endoscopic therapy does not achieve treatment goals.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: is any treatment worthwhile?

While many therapeutic agents have been evaluated in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC), none have been shown in controlled trials to modify the course of disease. The bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been widely used in the treatment of PSC but its use remains controversial. It may have a role in providing chemoprotection against the development of colonic dysplasia/cancer in patients with associated inflammatory bowel disease. The exclusion of IgG4-associated cholangitis, which generally responds to immunosuppressant agents, is essential prior to deciding on an appropriate therapeutic strategy in PSC. In the absence of proven therapeutic agents, treatment strategies are usually aimed at minimizing the complications of the biliary disease. Endoscopic management of dominant strictures may improve long-term outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation has a good outcome in patients with end stage PSC.

Comorbidities, sphincterotomy, and balloon dilation predict post-ERCP adverse events in PSC patients: operator experience is protective

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease. Interventional ERCP improves survival in PSC patients.

AIMS

To describe the frequency and risk factors for post-ERCP adverse events in patients with PSC via multivariate analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study included patients with a diagnosis of PSC who underwent ERCP at academic institutions between February 2000 and October 2009. Demographis, co-morbid conditions, antibiotic use, cannulation method, ERCP maneuvers and 30-day post-ERCP adverse events were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 185 procedures were performed on 75 PSC patients (58 M,17 F). Seven endoscopists performed ERCPs. Comorbidies included ulcerative colitis (44%, n = 33), Crohn's disease (12%, n = 9 patients), Cirrhosis (8%, n = 6 patients) and autoimmune hepatitis (2.7%, n = 2). Cannulation was achieved using dye-free guidewire cannulation techniques in 139/185 procedures (76%) and with contrast-based techniques in 46/185 procedures (24%). Thirty-day post-ERCP adverse events included post-ERCP pancreatitis (5%, n = 9, cholangitis (1%, n = 2), acute cholecystitis (0.5%, n = 1), stent occlusion (0.5%, n = 1), stent migration (0.5%, n = 1), and bile leak (0.5%, n = 1). In the multivariate analysis, associations with specific endoscopists who performed the procedure (P = 0.01), biliary dilation (P = 0.02), sphincterotomy (P = 0.03), presence of cirrhosis (P = 0.05), Crohn's disease (P < 0.001), and autoimmune hepatitis (P < 0.001) significantly predicted a complication following ERCP. Gender, stenting during procedure, presence of a dominant stricture, and cholangitis were not predictive for post-ERCP adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors predicting 30-day post-ERCP adverse events included certain co-morbid conditions, the endoscopist ERCP volume, maneuvers during ERCP including dilation and sphincterotomy. Stenting was not associated with adverse events.

Hepatobiliary complications of inflammatory bowel disease

Several hepatobiliary abnormalities have been described in association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), small duct PSC, chronic hepatitis, cryptogenic cirrhosis, cholangiocarcinoma, and cholelithiasis. PSC is the most common biliary condition in patients with IBD, with an incidence ranging from 2.5% to 7.5%. PSC usually progresses insidiously and eventually leads to cirrhosis independent of inflammatory bowel disease activity. There is a very high incidence of cholangiocarcinoma and an elevated risk for developing colon cancer in patients with PSC. Medical therapy has not proven successful in slowing disease progression or prolonging survival. Treatment of symptoms due to cholestasis, such as pruritis and steatorrhea, is an important aspect of the medical care of patients with PSC. Our preferred treatment of pruritis due to cholestasis is with bile acid binding exchange resins, such as cholestyramine or colestipol. Endoscopic manipulation is recommended for treating complications of recurrent cholangitis or worsening jaundice in the setting of a dominant stricture, but endoscopic approaches have not been conclusively demonstrated to improve survival or decrease the need for liver transplantation. Liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment of advanced PSC, and should be considered in patients with complications of cirrhosis or intractable pruritis or fatigue.

Benign biliary strictures: current endoscopic management

Endoscopic treatment is the mainstay of therapy for benign billiary strictures, and surgery is reserved for selected patients in whom endoscopic treatment fails or is not feasible. The endoscopic approach depends mainly on stricture etiology and location, and generally involves the placement of one or multiple plastic stents, dilation of the stricture(s), or a combination of these approaches. Knowledge of biliary anatomy, endoscopy experience and a well-equipped endoscopy unit are necessary for the success of endoscopic treatment. This Review discusses the etiologies of benign biliary strictures and different endoscopic therapies and their respective outcomes. Data on newer therapies, such as the placement of self-expandable metal stents, and the treatment of biliary-enteric anastomotic strictures is also reviewed.

Plastic biliary stents for benign biliary diseases

Biliary plastic stenting plays a key role in the endoscopic management of benign biliary diseases. Complications following surgery of the biliary tract and liver transplantation are amenable to endoscopic treatment by plastic stenting. Insertion of an increasing number of plastic stents is currently the method of choice to treat postoperative biliary strictures. Benign biliary strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis may benefit from plastic stenting in select cases. There is a role for plastic stent placement in nonoperative candidates with acute cholecystitis and in patients with irretrievable bile duct stones.

Systematic review: management options for primary sclerosing cholangitis and its variant forms - IgG4-associated cholangitis and overlap with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains a challenging disease to manage. The main goals are prevention of disease progression and reduction of the increased cancer risk.

AIMS

To review the management strategies for PSC and its variant forms based on published studies.

METHODS

Publications were identified using Pubmed, Medline and Ovid search engines.

RESULTS

Distinguishing PSC from variants, such as IgG4-associated cholangitis, and overlap with autoimmune hepatitis is essential to guide treatment decisions. There is no proven efficacious medical treatment for PSC. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been disappointing in low and moderate doses, and potentially dangerous in higher doses, although its role and optimal dose in chemoprevention requires investigation. The novel bile acid, 24-norursodeoxycholic acid, has shown promise in mouse models; human trials are in progress. Dominant strictures are optimally managed by dilatation and stenting to relieve obstructive complications, although exclusion of biliary malignancy is essential. Liver transplantation is the only proven therapy for those with advanced disease. Cholangiocarcinoma remains the most unpredictable and feared complication. In highly selected groups, neo-adjuvant chemoradiation with liver transplantation seems promising, but requires further validation. Screening for inflammatory bowel disease and surveillance for colorectal carcinoma should not be overlooked.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective management of PSC and its variants is hindered by uncertainties regarding pathogenesis of disease and factors responsible for its progression. Genome studies may help to identify further targets for drug therapy and factors leading to malignant transformation.

Analytical review of diagnosis and treatment strategies for dominant bile duct strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of indeterminate dominant strictures (DS) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is challenging and the literature on the subject is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to appraise and synthesize the evidence published in the English-language medical literature on this topic.

METHODS

Scientific papers published from 1950 until week 4 of July 2010 were extracted from MEDLINE, Ovid Medline In-Process, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMBASE, PubMed and the National Library of Medicine Gateway.

RESULTS

Strategies for the optimal management of DS in PSC patients are supported only by level II and III evidence. Intraductal endoscopic ultrasound appears to be the most sensitive (64%) and specific (95%) diagnostic test for the evaluation of DS in PSC. Endoscopic and percutaneous dilatations achieve 1- and 3-year palliation in 80% and 60% of patients, respectively. Although dilatation and stenting are the most common palliative interventions in DS, no randomized trials on the optimal duration of treatment have been conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

In benign DS, endoscopic dilatation with short-term stenting seems to be effective and safe and does not increase the risks for malignant transformation or complications after liver transplantation. Surgical bile duct resection and/or bilioenteric bypass are indicated only in patients with preserved liver function.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis and treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterized by progressive fibrosing obliteration of the biliary tract. In some cases the disease is restricted to the small bile ducts, but most patients develop fibrotic stenoses of the larger bile ducts. Despite advances in magnetic resonance cholangiography, in unclear cases endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is necessary to make the correct diagnosis. In patients with total or subtotal strictures of the large bile ducts, these so-called dominant stenoses may be treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation and/or stent placement, though in the large majority of cases a stent placement is not necessary. Several studies showed an improvement of biochemical parameters after endoscopic treatment, and actuarial survival in these patients was improved compared with predicted survival. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography allows tissue sampling, brush cytology, and bile analysis for early detection of cholangiocarcinoma, a major complication of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Despite successful endoscopic opening of bile duct stenoses, patients often progress to liver failure, leading to liver transplantation as the treatment of choice.

Endoscopic dilation of dominant stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis: outcome after long-term treatment

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and obliteration of intra- and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. Total or subtotal stenoses of major bile ducts are associated with reduced survival.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome after long-term endoscopic treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center study.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 171 patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid were followed for as long as 20 years. At entry, 20 patients had dominant stenoses, and during a median follow-up period of 7.1 years, dominant stenosis developed in another 77.

INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-six patients with dominant stenoses were treated by repeated balloon dilation; 5 patients with complete obstruction with bacterial cholangitis were stented.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Survival free of liver transplantation, number of procedures, complications.

RESULTS

In total, 500 balloon dilations were performed and 5 stents were placed. Complications were pancreatitis (2.2%), bacterial cholangitis (1.4%), and bile duct perforation (0.2%); there were no deaths. Repeated endoscopic interventions allowed the preservation of a functioning common bile duct and of at least 1 hepatic duct up to 2 cm above the bifurcation in all patients. Progression of intrahepatic bile duct and liver disease led to the need for liver transplantation in 22 of 96 patients. Five years after the first dilation of a dominant stenosis, the survival free of liver transplantation rate was 81%, and after 10 years, it was 52%.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study, no control group, primary end-stage liver disease excluded.

CONCLUSION

Repeated endoscopic balloon dilations of dominant stenoses allow the preservation of a functioning common bile duct for many years.

Plastic or metal stents for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures: a systematic review

Background

Benign biliary strictures may be a consequence of surgical procedures, chronic pancreatitis or iatrogenic injuries to the ampulla. Stents are increasingly being used for this indication, however it is not completely clear which stent type should be preferred.

Methods

A systematic review on stent placement for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures was performed after searching PubMed and EMBASE databases. Data were pooled and evaluated for technical success, clinical success and complications.

Results

In total, 47 studies (1116 patients) on outcome of stent placement were identified. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one non-randomized comparative studies and 46 case series were found. Technical success was 98,9% for uncovered self-expandable metal stents (uSEMS), 94,8% for single plastic stents and 94,0% for multiple plastic stents. Overall clinical success rate was highest for placement of multiple plastic stents (94,3%) followed by uSEMS (79,5%) and single plastic stents (59.6%). Complications occurred more frequently with uSEMS (39.5%) compared with single plastic stents (36.0%) and multiple plastic stents (20,3%).

Conclusion

Based on clinical success and risk of complications, placement of multiple plastic stents is currently the best choice. The evolving role of cSEMS placement as a more patient friendly and cost effective treatment for benign biliary strictures needs further elucidation. There is a need for RCTs comparing different stent types for this indication.

Influence of dominant bile duct stenoses and biliary infections on outcome in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) dominant stenoses are frequently associated with bacterial, and in part, also fungal infections of the bile ducts. In the present study, the influence of dominant stenoses and of biliary infections on the long-term outcome was studied.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 171 patients were followed up for 20 years. All patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. Dominant stenoses were treated endoscopically and during endoscopic procedures, bile was obtained for microbiologic analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 171 patients, 97 had or developed major bile duct stenoses and 96/97 were treated endoscopically. In the 55/97 patients with dominant stenosis, bile samples were obtained and of these, 41/55 had bacteria, five had also Candida and 2/55 had only Candida in their bile. Survival free of liver transplantation in patients without dominant stenosis at 18 years was 73.1% and of patients with dominant stenosis was 25.0% (p=0.011). Bacteria in bile had no effect on survival whereas Candida in bile was associated with reduced survival (p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with dominant stenosis, survival free of liver transplantation is reduced. Bacteria in bile do not worsen the outcome if dominant stenoses are opened endoscopically and infection is adequately treated with antibiotics. Candida in bile is associated with a poor prognosis and these patients need liver transplantation relatively soon.

Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The risk of complications associated with this procedure is not well established in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of ERCP complications in PSC vs. non-PSC patients.

METHODS

We identified all Mayo Clinic patients who underwent ERCP in 2005. Procedural and clinical data were collected. Complications were defined as hospitalizations for pancreatitis, cholangitis, perforation, and bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients with PSC and 981 patients without PSC had at least one ERCP examination in the calendar year 2005. PSC patients were younger (48 years+/-15 vs. 60 years+/-19, P<0.000) and had a higher prevalence of portal hypertension (31.5% vs. 4%, P<0.0001). PSC patients had more biopsies (39% vs. 15%, P<0.0001), brushings (37% vs. 8%, P<0.001), balloon dilatations (48% vs. 15%, P<0.0001), duct cytology (20% vs. 3%, P<0.0001) and intraductal ultrasounds (11% vs. 5%, P=0.007) than non-PSC patients. The duration of the procedure was longer in the PSC group (51 min+/-29 vs. 40 min+/-28, P<0.0001). The overall rate of complications in patients with PSC when compared to non-PSC patients was not significantly different (18/168 (11%) vs. 76/981(8%), P=0.2). The incidence of cholangitis was higher in the PSC group (4% vs. 0.2%, P<0.0002) despite routine use of antibiotics before the procedure in PSC patients. The duration of the procedure was longer in PSC patients who developed cholangitis (86 min+/-28 vs. 51 min+/-29, P=0.02). The risks of complications such as pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups despite their demographic and procedural variations. The duration of hospitalization due to complications was also not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications requiring hospitalizations occur in over 10% of PSC patients undergoing ERCP. Cholangitis occurs more often in PSC patients and correlates with the length of the procedure. Further studies to confirm the role of aggressive prophylactic antibiotics in patients with PSC who undergo prolonged procedures are warranted.

Endoscopic evaluation and therapies of biliary disorders

Biliary disorders were once only accessible by orthodox surgery but are now diagnosed and treated by multiple methods and specialists. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has flourished and continues to grow after its introduction with the first biliary spincterotomies in 1974 in Germany and Japan. The therapeutic biliary endoscopist contributes to the management of all biliary disorders and in many cases endoscopy is the preferable approach. However, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography remains a risky procedure and risk is best reduced by strictly limiting its use.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: the role of extrahepatic biliary resection

PSC is an idiopathic chronic cholestatic disease of the liver that has a variable clinical course. Patients should be managed based on the degree of liver dysfunction, as well as the degree of biliary obstruction and symptoms. Endoscopic biliary dilations provides symptomatic and biochemical relief with minimal morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic procedures, however, result in shorter overall and transplant-free survival than resection and may not decrease the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma. Dominant strictures that fail endoscopic management may harbor an underlying cholangiocarcinoma and surgical therapy should not be delayed. While transplantation is the option of choice in PSC patients with cirrhosis, extrahepatic biliary resection including the bifureation is a good therapeutic option in noncirrhotic patients. Resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree with the hepatic duct bifurcation should be considered in patients with a dominant extrahepatic stricture and preserved liver function. In the appropriately selected patient, extrahepatic biliary resection affords patients with survival rates equivalent to that of transplantation. In fact, extrahepatic biliary resection can potentially significantly delay or avoid transplantation. Extrahepatic biliary resection is a good durable option for noncirrhotic patients with PSC and a dominant extrahepatic stricture.

A twenty-year experience with endoscopic therapy for symptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis

GOALS

The current study presents 1 tertiary endoscopy center's 20-year experience using endoscopic therapy to treat patients with symptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy for patients with PSC and dominant strictures has been used for more than 20 years, but there is concern that instrumenting a sclerotic biliary tree induces risks that outweigh anticipated benefits.

STUDY

In this retrospective chart review, 117 patients with PSC were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients had a mean age of 47 years (range: 15 to 86 y). Mean duration of follow-up was 8 years (range: 2 to 20 y). Of the 117 identified patients, 106 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on one or more occasions (for a total of 317 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies), and a subset of 84 patients received endoscopic therapy for treatment of dominant strictures and/or deteriorating clinical status. Actual survival for endoscopically treated patients was compared with predicted survival using the Mayo Clinic natural history model for PSC.

RESULTS

Our chart review revealed 23 recognized complications among the 317 procedures performed (7.3%), and no procedure-related deaths. Observed patient survival at years 3 and 4 was significantly higher than that predicted by the Mayo Clinic natural history model for PSC (P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PSC who have a deteriorating clinical course benefited from endoscopic therapy to provide drainage of bile ducts, removal of stones, and/or temporary relief from obstructions, with acceptable procedure-related complications and higher than expected 3-year and 4-year survival.

The challenges in primary sclerosing cholangitis--aetiopathogenesis, autoimmunity, management and malignancy

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease, characterized by progressive inflammation and fibrosis of the bile ducts, resulting in biliary cirrhosis and is associated with a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma. The majority of patients are young, male and have coexisting inflammatory bowel disease. PSC is found with a prevalence of 10/100,000 in Northern European populations. The pathophysiology of PSC is a complex multistep process including immunological mechanisms, immunogenetic susceptibility and disorders of the biliary epithelia. The diagnosis is primarily based on endoscopic cholangiography although magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly used; biochemistry and immunoserology as well as histology play only a minor role. Due to the high risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma and also other tumours of the GI tract, surveillance strategies are essential, however they have yet to be established and evaluated. Biochemical parameters, clinical risk factors, endoscopic procedures and imaging techniques contribute to the early identification of patients at risk. Since medical therapy of PSC with ursodeoxycholic acid does not improve survival, to date, liver transplantation is the only option with a cure potential; if transplantation is accurately timed, transplanted PSC patients have an excellent rate of survival. However if cholangiocarcinoma is detected, a curative treatment is not possible in the majority of cases. The present review critically summarizes the current knowledge on the aetiopathogenesis of PSC and gives an overview of the diagnostic approaches, surveillance strategies and therapeutic options. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a disease of unknown aetiology and without any further curative treatment options apart from liver transplantation. Therefore it may be regarded as the greatest challenge in hepatology today.

Current diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an important liver disease with major morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of PSC is confirmed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography is performed in patients needing therapeutic endoscopy. As a result of the unknown cause of the disease, current medical therapies are unsatisfactory. Nevertheless, high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid should be recommended for treatment of PSC patients because there is a trend toward increased survival. Dominant bile duct stenoses should be treated endoscopically. However, liver transplantation continues to be the only therapeutic option for patients with advanced disease. Estimation of prognosis and timing of liver transplantation should be determined individually for each PSC patient on the basis of all results. The diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) still remain a challenge in PSC patients. Early diagnosis of CC certainly is a prerequisite for successful treatment with surgical resection or innovative strategies such as neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with subsequent orthotopic liver transplantation. Therefore, endoscopic techniques such as cholangioscopy and/or intraductal ultrasound may be useful diagnostic tools in patients with stenoses suspicious for malignancy.

Endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, cholestatic liver condition characterized by progressive fibrosis and destruction of the intra- and extrahepatic biliary tree. PSC has a clear association with inflammatory bowel disease and is often progressive, leading to cirrhosis and end-stage liver failure. For many patients, liver transplantation offers the only hope of long-term survival. No effective medical treatment exists, and therapy is often aimed at treating complications of the disorder, including dominant biliary strictures, which may cause symptomatic jaundice, cholangitis, and pruritus. Studies on endoscopic therapy (eg, biliary dilation and/or stent insertion) have shown favorable results, although most studies have been small, retrospective, and uncontrolled. Up to 20% of patients with PSC develop cholangiocarcinoma; however, distinguishing between cholangiocarcinoma and benign strictures can be difficult. Ideally, randomized trials are required to determine the safest and most effective endoscopic management for symptomatic dominant strictures.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of benign biliary strictures

Several conditions may cause benign biliary stricture formation. Intraoperative bile duct injury, most often sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is the leading cause. Although surgical bypass procedure was the traditional treatment of choice for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has recently come into favor; however, success rates have been variable and largely dependent on the underlying etiology. Because endoscopic therapy may be unsuccessful, a multidisciplinary approach to management, with surgical or radiological intervention if necessary, should be considered.

Complications after ERCP in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the role of ERCP in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and the risk of procedure-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the complication rate after ERCP in a consecutive series of patients with PSC compared with control patients with biliary strictures who did not have PSC.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A tertiary referral academic hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of complications after ERCP.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

A total of 85 ERCPs among 30 patients with PSC and 70 ERCPs among 45 control patients were reviewed. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rates between patients with and without PSC (11/85 [12.9%] vs 6/70 [8.6%], P = .45). Complications in PSC were more likely to occur after ERCP done to evaluate an acute sign or symptom than in elective cases (7/24 [29.2%] vs 4/61 [6.6%], P = .01). Patients with PSC who had complications had more total and acute ERCPs than did those without complications. There was no significant difference in the rate of complications in diagnostic versus therapeutic ERCPs nor between stent placement and dilation-only therapeutic ERCPs in the PSC population.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study design and limited power related to the small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective ERCP is safe and carries a modest risk in patients with PSC; however, ERCP for acute indications greatly increases the probability of postprocedure complications. The overall complication rate after therapeutic ERCP in patients with PSC is similar to that in patients without PSC.