Use of the 25 mm flanged esophageal Z stent for malignant dysphagia: a prospective multicenter trial

Complications Related to Esophageal Stent (Boston Scientific Wallflex vs. Merit Medical Endotek) Use in Benign and Malignant Conditions

Background In our institutions, there are two types of stents used: the Boston Scientific Wallflex (Marlborough, Massachusetts) and Merit Medical Endotek (South Jordan, Utah). So we performed this retrospective study to compare complication rates in various esophageal disorders to improve our quality of care. Methods Charts were reviewed to capture gender, indications of stent placement, stent length/diameter, age of the patient at the time of stent placement, length of hospital stay, physicians performing a procedure, and complications within 90 days of stent placement. Results A total of 67 patients (71.6% male) underwent stent placement (WallFlex 49.3% and Merit 50.8%) for malignant (68.7%) mainly esophageal obstruction by primary esophageal cancer (89.1%) and benign causes (31.3%) mainly esophageal leak (66.7%). Merit and WallFlex used in malignant conditions were 82.4% and 54.6%, respectively, and in benign conditions, they were 17.7% and 45.5%, respectively. The mean age at which endoscopy was performed was 64. Complications post Merit and WallFlex placement were 79.4% and 60.6%, respectively. Complications with malignant and benign conditions were 73.9% and 61.9%, respectively. Complications with 19, 18, and 23 mm diameters were 75.0%, 66.7%, and 69.4%, respectively. Complications with 120, 150, 100, 15, 12, 10 mm stent lengths were 84.6%, 58.3%, 58.8%, 80.0%, 75.0%, and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusion Our study showed that the Merit stent was mainly used, and the major indication of stent placement was a malignant condition. Major complications were seen when the reason for stent placement was a malignant condition, the diameter was 19 mm, the length was 120 mm, and the use of the Merit stent.

Techniques and principles of endoscopic treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The fundamental goal of treating any stenosis is luminal enlargement to ameliorate the underlying obstructive symptoms. Symptoms depend on the etiology and the site of the stricture and may include dysphagia, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, obstipation, or frank bowel obstruction. This article compares the various current technologies available for the treatment of gastrointestinal stenoses with regard to ease and site of application, patient tolerance, safety and efficacy data, and cost-benefit ratio.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies indicate that gastrointestinal dilation and stenting have evolved to a point at which in many if not most situations they can be the first line therapy and potentially the final therapy needed to treat the underlying condition.

SUMMARY

Following techniques and principles in the management of gastrointestinal strictures would allow for the well tolerated and effective treatment of most patients with the tools currently available today.

Endoscopic management and prevention of migrated esophageal stents

The use of self-expandable metallic stents has increased recently to palliate inoperable esophageal neoplasia and also in the management of benign strictures. Migration is one of the most common complications after stent placement and the endoscopist should be able to recognize and manage this situation. Several techniques for managing migrated stents have been described, as well as new techniques for preventing stent migration. Most stents have a "lasso" at the upper flange which facilitates stent repositioning or removal. An overtube, endoloop and large polypectomy snare may be useful for the retrieval of stents migrated into the stomach. External fixation of the stent with Shim's technique is efficient in preventing stent migration. Suturing the stent to the esophageal wall, new stent designs with larger flanges and double-layered stents are promising techniques to prevent stent migration but they warrant validation in a larger cohort of patients.

Evidence-based recommendations on upper gastrointestinal tract stenting: a report from the stent study group of the korean society of gastrointestinal endoscopy

Endoscopic stents have evolved dramatically over the past 20 years. With the introduction of uncovered self-expanding metal stents in the early 1990s, they are primarily used to palliate symptoms of malignant obstruction in patients with inoperable gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. At present, stents have emerged as an effective, safe, and less invasive alternative for the treatment of malignant GI obstruction. Clinical decisions about stent placement should be made based on the exact understanding of the patient's condition. These recommendations based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus are made for the purpose of providing endoscopists with information about stent placement. These can be helpful for management of patients with inoperable cancer or various nonmalignant conditions in the upper GI tract.

Enteral stents

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2010 for articles related to enteral, esophageal, duodenal, and colonic stents. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Self-expanding plastic stent to palliate symptomatic tissue in/overgrowth after self-expanding metal stent placement for esophageal cancer

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are used to treat obstructive malignancies of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction; however, a potential complication is recurrent dysphagia because of tissue in/overgrowth. The placement of a second SEMS is one strategy to re-establish patency of the esophageal lumen. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an alternative and likely less costly approach: placing a self-expanding plastic stent (SEPS) to manage relapsing dysphagia in patients previously treated with a partially covered SEMS. From December 2007 to January 2009, 13 patients previously treated with a SEMS for malignant dysphagia underwent treatment by inserting a SEPS to palliate relapsing dysphagia, as a result of tissue in/overgrowth. Stenosis was located in the upper esophagus in one patient, in the middle in four patients, and in the lower esophagus in eight patients. Clinical evaluation was performed at the time of stent placement, after 1 week, and then, monthly until death. The SEPS was successfully placed in a single treatment session for all patients. No preliminary dilation was required, and no further treatment was necessary for any patient. Before stenting, the median dysphagia score was 4 (range 3-4), and 1 week later the score was 0 for all patients. The resolution of dysphagia persisted until patient death (from tumor progression). The mean survival after the SEPS insertion was 4 months (range 3-8). This case series supports the use of a SEPS to palliate dysphagia from tissue in/overgrowth of a SEMS. Future clinical trials with larger patient samples are warranted.

Role of esophageal stents in benign and malignant diseases

These recommendations provide an evidence-based approach to the role of esophageal stents in the management of benign and malignant diseases. These guidelines have been developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee and approved by the Board of Trustees. The following guidelines are based on a critical review of the available scientific literature on the topic identified in Medline and PubMed (January 1992-December 2008) using search terms that included stents, self-expandable metal stents, self-expandable plastic stents, esophageal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal stricture, perforations, anastomotic leaks, tracheoesophageal fistula, and achalasia. These guidelines are intended for use by health-care providers and apply to adult, but not pediatric, patients. As with other practice guidelines, these guidelines are not intended to replace clinical judgment but rather to provide general guidelines applicable to the majority of patients. Clinicians need to integrate recommendations with their own clinical judgment, and with individual patient circumstances, values, and preferences. They are intended to be flexible, in contrast to standards of care, which are inflexible policies designed to be followed in every case. Specific recommendations are based on relevant published information. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations have been assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, which is a system that has been adopted by multiple national and international societies. The GRADE system is based on a sequential assessment of quality of evidence, followed by assessment of the balance between benefits vs. downsides (harms, burden, and costs) and subsequent judgment regarding the strength of recommendation.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of palliative therapies for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

A dramatic rise in incidence, an aging population, and expensive palliative treatments have led to an escalating burden on clinicians managing inoperable esophageal cancer with only limited evidence of effectiveness. This study compares the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) with other palliative therapies to aid clinicians in making an evidence-based treatment choice.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 215 patients followed until death or study closure. The primary outcome measures were dysphagia, quality of life (QL) 6 weeks following treatment, and total cost of treatment. Secondary outcome measures included treatment-associated morbidity, mortality, survival, and cost-effectiveness. An intention-to-treat analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in mean dysphagia grade between treatment arms 6 weeks following treatment (P=0.046), with worse swallowing reported by rigid stent-treated patients (mean dysphagia score difference=-0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 to -0.89, P=0.014). Global QL scores were lower at both 1 and 6 weeks following treatment for patients treated by SEMSs (mean difference QL index week 1=-0.66; 95% CI: -0.02 to -1.30, P=0.04; mean difference QL index week 6=-1.01; 95% CI -0.30 to -1.72, P=0.006). These findings were associated with higher post-procedure pain scores in the SEMS patient group (mean difference of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C-30 pain symptom score at week 1=11.13; 95% CI: 2.89-19.4; P=0.01). Although mean EQ-5D QL values differed between the treatments (P<0.001), this difference dissipated following generation of quality-adjusted life year values. Total costs varied between treatment arms but these findings canceled out when SEMSs were compared with non-SEMS therapies (95% CI -845.15-1,332.62). These results were robust to sensitivity analysis. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality or early complication rates, but late complications were more frequent after rigid stenting (risk ratio=2.47; 95% CI 1.88-3.04). There was a survival advantage for non-stent-treated patients (log-rank statistic=4.21, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment choice for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer should be between a SEMS or a non-stent treatment after consideration has been given to both patient and tumor characteristics and clinician and patient preferences.

Fixation of a covered self-expandable metal stent by means of a polypectomy snare: an easy method to prevent stent migration

Management of oesophageal leaks is controversial. Covered self-expandable-metallic stents have been used for several conditions, but migration of the stents is frequent. We report the case of a patient with post-surgery oesophageal fistula in which, to prevent dislocation, a covered self-expandable-metallic stent was fixed externally using a polypectomy snare.

Esophageal stents for malignant strictures close to the upper esophageal sphincter

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding stents are a well-accepted palliative treatment modality for strictures resulting from esophageal carcinoma. However, the use of stents close to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is considered to be limited by patient intolerance caused by pain and globus sensation and an increased risk of complications, particularly tracheoesophageal fistula formation and aspiration pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of stent placement in patients with a malignant obstruction close to the UES.

DESIGN

Evaluation of 104 patients with dysphagia from a malignant stricture close to the UES treated in the period 1996-2006.

SETTING

Single university center.

PATIENTS

Patients with primary esophageal carcinoma (n = 66) or recurrent cancer after gastric tube interposition (n = 38) within 8 cm distance distal of the UES. Twenty-four (23%) patients also had a tracheoesophageal fistula.

INTERVENTIONS

Stent placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional and technical outcome, survival, complications, and recurrent dysphagia. Analyses were performed by chi(2) test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank testing.

RESULTS

Mean distance from the UES to the upper tumor margin was 4.9 +/- 2.6 cm and to the upper stent margin 3.1 +/- 2.3 cm. The procedure was technically successful in 100 of 104 (96%) patients. Fistula sealing was achieved in 19 of 24 (79%) patients. After 4 weeks, dysphagia had improved from a median score of 3 (liquids only) to 1 (some difficulties with solids). Total complications were seen in 34 of 104 (33%) patients. Of these, major complications (aspiration pneumonia [9], hemorrhage [8], fistula [7], and perforation [2]) occurred in 22 (21%) patients, whereas pain after stent placement was observed in 16 (15%) patients. Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 29 (28%) patients and was mainly caused by tissue ingrowth or overgrowth (n = 10), food bolus obstruction (n = 7), stent migration (n = 3), or other reasons (n = 11), such as persistent fistula (n = 5), difficulty with swallowing (n = 4), and dislocation of the stent (n = 2). Eight (8%) patients complained of globus sensation; however, in none of the patients was stent removal indicated.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement is safe and effective for the palliation of dysphagia and sealing of fistulas in patients with a malignant stricture close to the UES. On the basis of these results, stent placement may be considered for palliation in this group of patients with an otherwise dismal prognosis.

A randomized prospective comparison of self-expandable plastic stents and partially covered self-expandable metal stents in the palliation of malignant esophageal dysphagia

OBJECTIVES

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide effective palliation in patients with malignant dysphagia, although severe complications and mortality may result. We performed a prospective controlled trial to compare a new self-expanding polyester mesh stent (Polyflex) with SEMS (Ultraflex).

METHODS

One hundred one patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma were randomized to placement of a Polyflex (N=47) or a partially covered Ultraflex (N=54) stent. Patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Placement was successful in 46 (98%) patients with the Polyflex and 54 (100%) patients with the Ultraflex stent. In one patient, the Polyflex stent could not be placed. After 1 wk, dysphagia was improved by at least 1 grade in 100% of the Polyflex group and in 94% of the Ultraflex group. Major complications were observed in 48% of the Polyflex group and 33% of the Ultraflex group. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 1 Polyflex and 1 Ultraflex patient. Two Polyflex patients had postprocedural hemorrhage. Twenty (44%) patients with a Polyflex stent and 18 (33%) with an Ultraflex stent had recurrent dysphagia because of tumor overgrowth, stent migration, hyperplastic granulomatous reaction, or food bolus impaction. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher complication rate with Polyflex than with Ultraflex stents (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4). However, median survival was 134 days with Polyflex and 122 days with Ultraflex stents (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was seen in palliation of dysphagia between the two stents. Significantly more complications, especially late stent migration, were observed in the Polyflex group.

Fate of migrated esophageal and gastroduodenal stents: experience in 70 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the frequency of esophageal and gastroduodenal stent migration and the fate of such stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors studied five types of covered metal stents. Type A stents were nonretrievable polyurethane-covered stents with shouldered ends (n = 169), type B stents were retrievable polyurethane-covered stents with shouldered ends (n = 62), type C stents were retrievable polyurethane-covered stents with flared ends (n = 72), type D stents were retrievable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents with shouldered ends (n = 369), and type E stents were separated stents (n = 216). Types A-D stents were esophageal stents, and the type E stent was a gastroduodenal stent. Stents were placed in 888 patients with either benign (n = 43) or malignant (n = 845) causes of stricture. The rate of stent migration was analyzed relative to completeness of migration, the cause of obstruction, stent type, and stent placement location. The fate of migrated stents and the treatment of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stent migration occurred in 70 of the 888 patients (7.9%). Migration occurred in 11 of the 43 patients (25%) with benign cause of strictures and 591 of the 845 patients (7.0%) with malignant cause. The migration rates for types A, B, C, D, and E stents were 10%, 4.8%, 24%, 7.3% and 2.8%, respectively. Of the 70 migrated stents, 45 had complete migration and 25 had partial migration. The anastomotic sites were the areas most commonly associated with migration (16%), but this was not statistically significant. Forty of the 70 migrated stents were removed with retrieval devices under fluoroscopic guidance because they were not passed with stool and possibility of complications related to migrated stents. The remaining 30 stents exited via the rectum (n = 15), remained in the body without complications (n = 12), or were surgically removed because they caused complicated intestinal obstructions (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

The overall migration rate for esophageal and gastroduodenal stents was 7.9%. Most migrated stents were removed nonsurgically, exited the body spontaneously, or remained in the body in an uncomplicated state. Surgical stent removal was necessary in three patients (4.3%) due to complicated intestinal obstructions.

Polyflex stents for malignant oesophageal and oesophagogastric stricture: a prospective, multicentric study

OBJECTIVE

Dysphagia is the most distressing symptom in patients with cancer-related oesophageal obstruction. Endoscopic palliation aims to restore swallowing, avoid reintervention and to reduce hospitalization. This study reports an experience with a new self-expandable plastic stent (Polyflex) in patients with unresectable oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer.

METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively collected. The cause of obstruction was oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (44) and adenocarcinoma (eight), lung cancer (seven) and thyroid tumour (one).

RESULTS

The stent was successfully placed in 59 patients. Early minor complications occurred in 19 patients (32%), and major complications in 13 (22%). Death occurred in three patients owing to pulmonary embolism (one) and massive haemorrhage (two). Recurrent dysphagia for early stent migration was observed in seven patients. Delayed stent migration occurred in five patients and tumour overgrowth in eight patients. The mean dysphagia score of 2.8 improved to a mean score of 1.0 after stenting (P<0.001). Overall median survival time was 4.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that Polyflex stents are competitive with metal stents, with similar efficacy but lower cost. Technical improvements, however, are required to make these stents more user friendly. Large randomized clinical studies are needed to guide in the choice among the different available stents.

A new esophageal stent design (Niti-S stent) for the prevention of migration: a prospective study in 42 patients

BACKGROUND

Covered, rather than uncovered, metal stents are used for the palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer, but a major drawback is the risk of stent migration, which occurs in up to 20% of patients. To overcome this problem, a double-layered stent, the Niti-S stent (Taewong Medical, Seoul, Korea), has been developed. The Niti-S stent consists of an inner polyurethane layer to prevent tumor ingrowth and an outer uncovered nitinol wire tube to allow the mesh of the stent to embed itself in the esophageal wall.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and May 2004, 42 patients with malignant dysphagia caused by inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia were treated with a Niti-S stent. Patients were prospectively followed and data collection focused on recurrent dysphagia, functional outcome, complications, and survival.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, the dysphagia score had significantly improved from a median of 3 (liquids only) to 0 (ability to eat a normal diet). Five of 42 (12%) patients with a Niti-S stent developed recurrent dysphagia, mainly due to tissue overgrowth (2 of 42; 5%) and stent migration (3 of 42; 7%). Major complications (perforation, 1; aspiration pneumonia, 2; hemorrhage, 2) occurred in 5 of 42 (12%) patients. Pain following stent placement was observed in 5 of 42 (12%) patients, and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 2 of 42 (5%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Niti-S stent provides symptomatic relief of malignant dysphagia and effectively reduces recurrent dysphagia. Its double-layered design is probably important in preventing migration. In addition, the complete covering of the Niti-S stent may be a factor in preventing tissue overgrowth at both ends of the stent.

Fluoroscopically guided insertion of self-expandable metal esophageal stents for palliative treatment of patients with malignant stenosis of esophagus and cardia: comparison of uncovered and covered stent types

The aim of this retrospective study was to present and compare the results of using two different types of esophageal self-expanding stents (uncovered and covered) for palliative treatment of patients with inoperable malignant stenosis of the esophagus and cardia. Over a period of 8 years, 152 patients underwent fluoroscopically guided insertion of metal esophageal stents. We inserted uncovered esophageal nitinol Strecker stents in 54 patients (group I) and covered esophageal Ultraflex stents in the remaining 98 patients (group II). The stent insertion procedure was successively performed in all patients. Closure of esophageal fistula by covered stents was achieved in 8/8 patients. Mean dysphagia score was significantly decreased in both patient groups at 4 weeks follow-up: from 2.73 before stent insertion to 0.15 in group I, and from 2.67 to 0.05 in group II (on 0-4 scale). Eighty-eight per cent of patients with covered stents and 54% with uncovered type were free of symptoms during follow-up. Complications occurring during follow-up and their comparative frequency in the two groups of patients were as follows (group I: group II%): stent migration (0:10%); tumor or granulation tissue ingrowth (100:53%); overgrowth at the ends of stents (17:30%); restenosis causing recurrent dysphagia (37:8%); and appearance of esophageal fistulas (8:6%). In conclusion, fluoroscopically guided insertion of self-expandable esophageal stents is a safe and comfortable method of palliation for patients suffering with malignant dysphagia. In selection of a stent, covered types should be given priority for prevention of restenosis.

Treatment of thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy with self-expanding plastic stents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a self-expanding plastic stent in the treatment of thoracic leaks after esophagectomy for cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Anastomotic leaks are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after esophageal resection. Treatment options range from aggressive surgery to conservative management, but there remains much controversy on the best treatment.

METHODS

Over a 6-year period (1998-2003), esophagogastric leaks were observed in 19 of 204 patients (9.3%) after esophagectomy. Between 1998 and 2000, anastomotic leaks were managed by reexploration (n = 7) or by conservative treatment (n = 3). Since 2001, insertion of self-expanding plastic stents was performed for all anastomotic leaks (n = 9). The short-term efficacy and long-term outcome of both treatments were analyzed.

RESULTS

Self-expanding plastic stents were successfully placed in all patients without procedure-related morbidity. Immediate leak occlusion was obtained in 8 of 9 patients. The mean healing time (time to stent removal) was 29 days. Compared with the conventional treatment group, patients who were treated with stents had earlier oral intake (11 days versus 23 days), a less extensive intensive care course (25 days versus 47 days), and shorter hospital stay (35 days versus 57 days). In-hospital mortality was 0% (0 of 9 patients) in the stent group and 20% (2 of 10 patients) in the other group. After a mean follow-up of 12 months, none of the patients developed a stricture after stenting, but a stricture occurred in 1 patient after conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding plastic stents can reduce leak-related morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy and may be considered a cost-effective treatment alternative.

Management of Tracheoesophageal Fistulas in Adults

The approach to treatment of adult patients with tracheoesophageal fistulas depends on whether the fistula is congenital or acquired in origin. Most adults have acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas, and treatment depends on whether the fistula is a result of a benign process or a malignancy, with the latter usually primary esophageal cancer. For patients with benign tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment is almost always initially supportive followed by definitive surgical correction. In general, depending on the size and location of the tracheal aspect of the fistula, surgical therapy involves primary repair of the fistula and, if necessary, resection and reconstruction of the trachea. For patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment depends on whether the patient is resectable and/or medically fit for surgical therapy. However, most patients with malignant trach-eoesophageal fistulas have advanced disease and can only be treated with palliative measures. The current standard of palliative therapy for patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas is the endoscopic or radiologic placement of covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS), which allow closure of the fistula. All three types of commercially available covered SEMS have been used in this capacity with success. Other, less common treatment options for selected patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas include chemotherapy and radiation, surgical bypass, esophageal exclusion, and fistula resection and repair.

Inoperable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a comparative clinical study of laser coagulation versus self-expanding metallic stents with special reference to cost analysis

AIMS

Neither clinical nor financial comparisons yet exist between self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) and laser therapy, concentrating on the treatment of obstructive adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction. The aim of our study was to compare the relative lifetime costs and clinical results of the Nd:YAG laser to those of SEMS as alternative forms of primary palliation of dysphagia for adenocarcinoma near the oesophagogastric junction.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with distal oesophageal or oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas underwent palliative treatment for dysphagia: 32 treated with laser therapy and 20 with SEMS in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome and real cumulative costs as physical units and in financial terms were analysed for these study groups.

RESULTS

Although patients palliated with SEMS underwent fewer procedures (1.9+/-1.6 vs 3.4+/-4.0, P=0.0048) and spent less time in endoscopic theatre (38+/-25min vs 118+/-152min, P=0.0048), they spent as many days in hospital (12.9 vs 15.1, P=0.370) and required as high overall costs for therapy (5360 EUR vs 5450 EUR, P=0.679) as those treated with laser therapy. In addition, they had higher morbidity rates (30 vs 6.3%, P=0.043), hospital mortality (20 vs 3.1%, P=0.066), and 30-day mortality (40 vs 3.1%, P=0.0011) than did patients with laser therapy, with no evidence of SEMS being the more effective treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adenocarcinoma at the distal oesophagus or at the oesophagogastric junction, laser therapy palliates dysphagia effectively with lower morbidity and mortality rates and without increased costs or hospital stays than does use of self-expanding metallic stents.

Self-expanding metal stents for complicated and recurrent esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Fewer complications are encountered with the use of self-expanding metal stents compared with semirigid prostheses in the palliation of patients with malignant esophagogastric obstructions. Metal stents can also be used to treat patients with complicated and/or recurrent esophagogastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Covered metal stents were placed in 57 patients for the following reasons: esophagorespiratory fistula (n = 16), recurrent carcinoma in a gastric tube interposition (n = 21), recurrent carcinoma after partial (n = 4) or total (n = 6) gastrectomy, or a carcinoma near the upper esophageal sphincter (n = 10).

RESULTS

The procedure was technically successful in 55 of 57 (96%) patients. Dysphagia score improved from a mean of 3.6 to 1.6 (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 13 (23%) patients. In all cases, esophagorespiratory fistulas were occluded. Tumor recurred in 5 of 16 patients with a fistula, 8 of 21 patients after gastric tube interposition, 3 of 10 patients after gastrectomy, and 2 of 10 patients with a tumor immediately distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Median survival was 61 days. Prior radiation, chemotherapy, or both increased the risk of specific stent-related complications in relation to the (neo)esophagus (6 of 16 [38%] versus 4 of 41 [10%]: odds ratio, 5.5: 95% CI [1.3, 24], p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stents are effective and relatively safe for palliation of patients with malignancy and dysphagia caused by fistula formation, postoperative recurrence, and tumors near the upper esophageal sphincter. Placement should be considered at an early stage in these conditions.

Successful endoscopical sealing of malignant esophageotracheal fistulae by using a covered self-expandable stenting system

OBJECTIVE

Any treatment of tracheo-esophageal fistulae in end-stage malignant stenosis of the esophagus must be weighed against associated morbidity and mortality. In a prospective study we investigated benefits and risks of the use of one type of coated, self-expandable stent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated four male and two female patients, (mean age 68.3 years, range: 38-90 years), with malignant esophago-tracheal fistula non-resectable due to advanced tumour stage and/or functional reasons. All were in a poor general condition suffering from aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. Four out of the six patients had had one or multiple extra- or endoluminal palliative treatments at a mean interval of 191 days (range: 7 days-15 ms) since the last intervention. The fistulae were sealed by using a covered, self-expandable stent (ULTRAFLEX esophageal stent system, Microinvasive, Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston, MA).

RESULTS

Stenting did not cause any technical problems and all fistulae were successfully sealed in a one-step procedure. The median hospital stay was 4.6 days (range: 3-9 days). Except for one late stent induced recurrent fistula treated by re-stenting and tracheostomy, we did not observe any stent associated complications. Five patients died of tumour generalization. The median survival of the patients who died was 78 days (range: 35-129 days). One patient is alive and well at 120 days after stenting.

CONCLUSION

In spite of the small number of patients the results suggest that this type of stent represents a safe and efficient approach for palliative endoscopic treatment of this high risk group. Local pretreatment does not preclude the successful use of the self-expandable coated stent.

A comparison of 3 types of covered metal stents for the palliation of patients with dysphagia caused by esophagogastric carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

There are currently 3 types of covered metal stents available in Europe for palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia. Their relative merits have not been compared in a prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with esophagogastric carcinoma were randomized to placement of an Ultraflex stent, a Flamingo Wallstent, or a Gianturco-Z stent. Malignant strictures of the esophagus were treated by insertion of a small-diameter stent (n = 71), whereas those involving the gastric cardia were treated with a large-diameter stent (n = 29).

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, dysphagia had improved in all patient groups (p < 0.001), but the degree of improvement did not differ among the 3 groups (p = 0.14). There were differences among the 3 stent types with respect to major complications (Ultraflex stent: 8/34 [24%], Flamingo Wallstent: 6/33 [18%], and Gianturco-Z stent: 12/33 [36%]), but these were not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Nine patients (26%) with an Ultraflex stent, 11 (33%) with a Flamingo Wallstent, and 8 (24%) with a Gianturco-Z stent had recurrent dysphagia (p = 0.73), mainly because of tumor overgrowth or stent migration; 12 of 13 episodes of migration involved small-diameter stents in the esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 covered metal stents evaluated offer the same degree of palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia. Placement of Gianturco-Z stents was associated with more complications as compared with Ultraflex stents and Flamingo Wallstents. Although stent migration is reduced by increasing stent diameter, tumor overgrowth remains an intractable problem that requires a new approach.

Are self-expanding metal mesh stents useful in the treatment of benign esophageal stenoses and fistulas? An experience of four cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the long-term results of treating benign esophageal fistula and stenosis using self-expanding metal stents.

METHODS

We treated four patients using covered mesh or coiled stents. We removed the stents electively in two patients (one endoscopically and one during planned partial esophagectomy) and unexpectedly in one patient who developed bleeding. One stent migrated and required laparotomy for removal.

RESULTS

Placement of self-expanding metal stents successfully sealed the benign fistula in two patients and reestablished swallowing in two other patients with complicated achalasia. Two patients were swallowing normally on long-term follow-up, one died of the underlying disease, and one required gastrostomy.

CONCLUSION

Temporary use of self-expanding metal stents as a feasible option for treating benign esophageal stenosis and fistula in patients who have failed other conventional treatments.

An update in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is generally associated with late presentation and poor prognosis. Therefore palliative surgery has been largely superseded by less invasive non-surgical techniques. Once palliation is indicated, the aims of the management should be: the maintenance of oral intake, minimizing hospital stay, relief of pain, elimination of reflux and regurgitation and the prevention of aspiration.

METHODS

This study was a review of all published English language data on the palliation of malignant dysphagia between 1994-1999. The Medline and Bids databases were searched and other references were derived from the material perused.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Palliative treatment for oesophageal cancer should be individualized and relate to tumour stage, size and location, the patient's medical condition and his/her personal wishes. The palliative treatment largely includes self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), laser (including photodynamic therapy (PDT)) or a combination of the two to relieve symptoms, this may be employed with or without other treatments such as radiotherapy/chemotherapy (RT/CT) with the aim of reducing tumour bulk and possibly prolonging survival. A multi-disciplinary approach is vital in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

A new design metal stent (Flamingo stent) for palliation of malignant dysphagia: a prospective study. The Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

Metal stents are not superior to conventional endoprostheses with respect to the incidence of recurrent dysphagia because of tumor ingrowth with uncovered stents and migration with their covered counterparts. To overcome these limitations, a partially covered (inside-out covering) metal stent with a conical shape and a varying braiding angle of the mesh along its length, the Flamingo stent, has been developed.

METHODS

From March 1997 to October 1997, 40 consecutive patients with dysphagia due to malignant tumors had either a small diameter (proximal/distal diameter 24/16 mm; n = 21) or a large diameter Flamingo stent (proximal/distal diameter 30/20 mm; n = 19) placed.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant improvement in dysphagia, but improvement was not greater with large diameter stents compared to small diameter stents (p = 0.21). Major complications (bleeding [4], perforation [1], fever [1] and fistula [1]) occurred in 7 (18%) patients. Large diameter stents tended to be associated with more major complications than small diameter stents (5 vs. 2; p = 0.07). Pain following stent placement was observed in 9 (22%) patients and occurred more frequently in those who had prior radiation and/or chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Recurrent dysphagia (mainly due to tumor overgrowth) occurred in 10 (25%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Flamingo stents are effective for palliation of malignant dysphagia, but the large diameter stent seems to be associated with more complications involving the esophagus than the small diameter stent. Because recurrent dysphagia is mainly due to tumor progression, further technical developments in stent design are needed.

Palliation of Dysphagia of Esophageal Cancer by Endoscopic Lumen Restoration Techniques

BACKGROUND: Cure of patients with esophageal cancer has remained rare over the past four decades. The overall five-year survival rate for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus currently is reported as 12% in whites and 8% in blacks. The five-year survival rate for localized disease at initial staging is only 26% for whites and 13% for blacks. With regional involvement, these rates are 11% and 7%, respectively. METHODS: The author reviews the literature on optimal endoscopic lumen restoration techniques, including dilation, thermal laser and chemical ablation, photodynamic therapy, and stents. Procedures for pain relief and nutritional support are also presented. RESULTS: Lumen restoration to relieve dysphagia and provide the opportunity for sustaining reasonable peroral nutrition is an essential element in the overall management. Nonsurgical lumen restoration procedures have much to offer for dysphagia palliation and are briefly reviewed in this presentation. The major options include ablation of intraluminal tumor mass by thermal laser, photodynamic laser, chemical ablation, peroral dilation, and placement of esophageal stents. Most patients require more than one palliative method to sustain lumen patency during the course of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with esophageal cancer will require palliation for the multiple problems that develop during their limited life span. The responsibility of the palliation therapist is to provide the patient with safe and cost-effective treatments that provide the best possible dysphagia relief.