Silicone-covered Wallstent prototypes for palliation of malignant esophageal obstruction and digestive-respiratory fistulas

Management of a malignant esophagopleural fistula after stent failure with a suturing pexy: time to seal the leak

Video 1Suturing pexy to seal a leak around an esophageal stent in the setting of a malignant esophago-pleural fistula.

Comparison of fully-covered vs partially covered self-expanding metallic stents for palliative treatment of inoperable esophageal malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following placement of fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (FCSEMS) vs partially covered self-expanding metallic stents (PCSEMS) for palliative treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases from inception up to 10th July 2019. Studies comparing clinical outcomes with FCSEMS vs PCSEMS in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer requiring palliative treatment for dysphagia were included.

Results

Five studies were included in the review. Two hundred twenty-nine patients received FCSEMS while 313 patients received PCSEMS in the five studies. There was no difference in the rates of stent migration between FCSEMS and PCSEMS (Odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95%CI 0.37–1.08, P = 0.09; I² = 0%). Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in technical success between the two groups (OR 1.32, 95%CI 0.30–5.03, P = 0.78; I² = 12%). Improvement in dysphagia was reported with both FCSEMS and PCSEMS in the included studies. There was no difference between the two stents for obstruction due to tissue growth (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.47–1.39, P = 0.44; I² = 2%) or by food (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.10–1.62, P = 0.20; I² = 29%). Incidence of bleeding (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.21–1.58, P = 0.28; I² = 0%) and chest pain (OR 1.06, 95%CI 0.44–2.57, P = 0.89; I² = 0%) was similar in the two groups. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs produced similar results. The overall quality of studies was not high.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that there is no difference in stent migration, and stent obstruction, with FCSEMS or PCSEMS when used for palliative treatment of esophageal malignancy.

Long Term Outcome in Patients with Esophageal Stenting for Cancer Esophagus - Our Experience at a Rural Hospital of Punjab, India

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of the esophagus is among the leading cause of cancer deaths in Punjab, India. Patients generally present with dysphagia as their first symptom and more often they have advanced disease at the time of presentation to a tertiary care centre. Palliative procedures have important roles in this setting. Stenting is the best option to palliate the symptoms of dysphagia, from which patient is suffering the most.

AIM

To know the success rate, early and long term complications and mortality in esophageal stenting, when it was done in malignant esophageal stricture patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients, who had undergone esophageal stenting from January 2012 to January 2015, were included in the study. We retrospectively analysed the data for patient characteristics, causes of non-operability, early and long term complications, re-interventions, efficacy and mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 100 patients, indications for stenting were locally advanced disease not amenable to surgery (52%), metastatic disease (35%), CVA (1%), cardiac and respiratory problem (8%), un-willing for surgery in 5% of patients. Majority of patients (94%) had squamous cell carcinoma, while only 6% had adenocarcinoma. 84% of patients presented with dysphagia with or without chest pain and recurrent cough while 16% had recurrent vomiting. 58% had dysphagia to liquids and solids and 17% had complete dysphagia. After stenting 93% had significant improvement in dysphagia score from median of 3 to 1. Post procedure stay was 3.61±1.0 days. One patient had procedure related major complication in the form of post procedural bleed (after 16 days of stenting) leading to death of that patient. Minor complications were present in 52 patients treated conservatively not affecting the efficacy of procedure. These include pain after stenting (38%), stent obstruction (23%) and stent migration (6%). All the minor complications were treated conservatively except in six patients in whom re-stenting was done.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal stenting is relatively safe procedure with short stay of the patient in the hospital. Although, it helps in alleviating patients' morbidity very effectively and reliably, there are many technical glitches, which needs to be kept into account and patient should be properly counseled before the procedure to prevent and manage post procedure complications and medico legal aspects.

Self-expanding metal stents in palliation of malignant dysphagia: outcome of 124 Egyptian patients

Most cases of esophageal carcinoma are inoperable at presentation. Currently, the best method for palliation of malignant dysphagia, with or without esophago-respiratory fistula, is an insertion of esophageal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) across the malignant esophageal stricture. Herein we present our experience in the use of SEMS in palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia and/or ERF. The study included 124 patients (79 males and 45 females) with advanced esophageal malignancy. The mean age was 54 (43-87) years. Nine patients had malignant ERF. All patients were subjected to SEMS insertion under both endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. SEMS insertion was successful in all patients. Nine patients had two stents. Median dysphagia score improved from 3.5 to 1.2. ERF was sealed in eight out of the nine patients. Complications related to stent implementation were reported in 41 patients. In conclusion, insertion of the SEMS is a reliable, effective, simple and safe method for palliation of malignant dysphagia with or without ERF.

The use of self-expandable plastic stents for non-malignant esophago-pleural fistulas

Anastomotic leaks and fistulas are unfortunate complications of esophageal-gastric surgery and esophageal dilations. Traditional management options have included surgery or a more conservative approach. There have been few reports describing the use of self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and tracheoesophageal fistulas from benign diseases. We are reporting the use of self-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of non-malignant esophago-pleural fistulas occurring after esophagectomy in one case and esophageal perforation post dilation in the other.

Palliation of malignant aerodigestive fistulae with self-expanding metallic stents

Malignant aerodigestive fistulae are rare but devastating sequelae of thoracic cancers, most commonly associated with esophageal cancer. Survival following development of a malignant aerodigestive fistula is measured in weeks. Palliation is the primary goal of therapy and to this end, we report the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as treatment. Between May 1999 and January 2004, 12 patients were treated for malignant aerodigestive fistulae. The underlying diagnosis was esophageal cancer for 10 patients, and non-small cell lung cancer for two others. All patients were symptomatic and fistulae were diagnosed by esophagoscopy in seven, bronchoscopy in two, and esophagram in three. Seven covered Wallstents (seven esophageal) and eight covered Ultraflex (five tracheal and three esophageal) were used. A single stent was placed in eight patients (seven esophageal and one tracheal). Three patients required esophageal and tracheal stents and one patient needed two tracheal stents. General anesthesia was required in 50% of the patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Symptoms were palliated in 100% of patients and oral intake was reinstituted in 42% (5/12). All the patients were discharged from hospital after SEMS placement and one patient returned for an uneventful tracheal stent replacement secondary to mucus impaction 2 months later. SEMS placement is an effective strategy to palliate malignant aerodigestive fistulae. Complications are rare and symptoms are alleviated in most patients.

Prior chemoradiotherapy is associated with a higher life-threatening complication rate after palliative insertion of metal stents in patients with oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding metal stents are used routinely to palliate dysphagia due to oesophageal cancer.

STUDY AIM

To compare the frequency of life-threatening complications after self-expanding metal stent insertion, depending on whether patients received prior chemoradiotherapy or no treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 7 years, 116 consecutive patients were treated at a single centre in a palliative intent by insertion of self-expanding metal stent for dysphagia due to an oesophageal cancer. Patients were retrospectively separated into two groups: patients with chemoradiotherapy before self-expanding metal stent insertion (group 1, n = 56) and patients with no treatment before or after self-expanding metal stent insertion (group 2, n = 60). Life-threatening complications were compared and predictive risk factors of postprocedure complications were identified.

RESULTS

Median dysphagia was significantly improved during the first month (grade 3 to grade 1 in the two groups). Early and late major complications occurred more frequently in group 1 (23.2% vs. 3.3%; P < 0.002 and 21.6% vs. 5.1%; P < 0.02 respectively). Prior chemoradiotherapy was the only independent predictive factor of postprocedure major complications, with an odds ratio of 5.59 (CI 95% 1.7-18.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Life-threatening complications after palliative self-expanding metal stent placement seem to occur more frequently in patients with prior chemoradiotherapy. Prevention of these severe complications should be considered before stenting.

A new esophageal stent design (Niti-S stent) for the prevention of migration: a prospective study in 42 patients

BACKGROUND

Covered, rather than uncovered, metal stents are used for the palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer, but a major drawback is the risk of stent migration, which occurs in up to 20% of patients. To overcome this problem, a double-layered stent, the Niti-S stent (Taewong Medical, Seoul, Korea), has been developed. The Niti-S stent consists of an inner polyurethane layer to prevent tumor ingrowth and an outer uncovered nitinol wire tube to allow the mesh of the stent to embed itself in the esophageal wall.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and May 2004, 42 patients with malignant dysphagia caused by inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia were treated with a Niti-S stent. Patients were prospectively followed and data collection focused on recurrent dysphagia, functional outcome, complications, and survival.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, the dysphagia score had significantly improved from a median of 3 (liquids only) to 0 (ability to eat a normal diet). Five of 42 (12%) patients with a Niti-S stent developed recurrent dysphagia, mainly due to tissue overgrowth (2 of 42; 5%) and stent migration (3 of 42; 7%). Major complications (perforation, 1; aspiration pneumonia, 2; hemorrhage, 2) occurred in 5 of 42 (12%) patients. Pain following stent placement was observed in 5 of 42 (12%) patients, and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 2 of 42 (5%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Niti-S stent provides symptomatic relief of malignant dysphagia and effectively reduces recurrent dysphagia. Its double-layered design is probably important in preventing migration. In addition, the complete covering of the Niti-S stent may be a factor in preventing tissue overgrowth at both ends of the stent.

New developments in palliative therapy

Over the past 5 years, new developments in the palliative treatment of incurable cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction have been introduced with the aim of palliating dysphagia and improving the survival of patients. Stent placement is currently the most widely used treatment for palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer. A stent offers rapid relief of dysphagia; however, current recurrent dysphagia rates vary between 30 and 40%. Recently introduced new stent designs are likely to reduce recurrent dysphagia by decreasing stent migration and non-tumoral tissue overgrowth. Intraluminal radiotherapy (brachytherapy) has been demonstrated to compare favourably with stent placement in long-term effectiveness and safety. A disadvantage of brachytherapy, however, is that one-fifth of patients need an additional treatment because of persistent tumour growth in the oesophagus. A solution may be to administer brachytherapy not in a single fraction but in multiple fractions. Finally, efforts have been undertaken to improve survival of patients by using chemotherapy. In the future, a multimodal approach--for example by combining stent placement with chemotherapy or radiotherapy--may improve the prognosis of patients without jeopardizing their quality of life.

A fast placement technique for covered tracheobronchial stents in patients with complicated esophagorespiratory fistulas

PURPOSE

To test an endotracheal placement procedure for malignant esophagorespiratory fistula when endoesophageal placement is inapplicable.

METHODS

We report on patients with malignant esophagorespiratory fistula to which endoesophageal approaches were complicated with a complete obstruction of the hypopharynx, a collapsible tracheobronchus, or a previously placed endoesophageal stents. Gore-Tex membrane-covered Z-stents were deployed in the trachea using a coaxial introducer system in three patients. A Dumon tube was deployed in the bronchus over the bronchofiberscope in one patient.

RESULTS

All fistula were completely sealed by the endotracheal or endobronchial stenting. Symptomatic and clinical improvements were immediate obtained.

CONCLUSION

Endotracheal or endobronchial covered stent placement is thought to be an effective alternative method for sealing esophagorespiratory fistula.

Clinical evaluation of radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer after metallic stent placement

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer after expandable metallic stent placement.

METHODS: Ten cases of advanced esophageal cancer were evaluated, 7 having complete obstruction and 3 with digestive-respiratory fistula. Ten nitinol stents were placed at the site of stenosis. Patients were treated with a total dose of 1200 cGy divided into 3 fractions of 400 cGy 4-7 d after stents placement.

RESULTS: All the 10 stents were placed successfully at one time. After radiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, the survival period of the cases ranged from 14 to 22 mo, with a mean survival of 17 mo. No re-stenosis occurred among all the 10 cases.

CONCLUSION: Stent placement combined with radiotherapy for esophageal cancer is helpful to prolong patients’ survival and reduce occurrence of re-stenosis.

Endoscopic intubation with conventional plastic stents: a safe and cost-effective palliation for inoperable esophageal cancer

Access to expensive equipment and costly self-expanding metal endoprostheses is limited in some regions where unresectable esophageal cancer is not infrequent. The aim of this study was to review the long-term results of palliation of malignant esophageal obstruction using low-priced conventional plastic stents. One hundred sixty-nine patients with dysphagia due to inoperable esophageal cancer underwent esophageal intubation under endoscopic control alone, without general anesthesia, by the pulsion method. Stents mounted on their delivery device were inserted over an endoscopically placed guide wire. Improvement in swallowing was seen in all patients. Dysphagia scores have improved from 3.64 +/- 0.21 to 1.08 +/- 0.17. Major early procedure-related morbidity was high at 0.6% with one intramural perforation (no transmural perforation at all). Minimal mucosal bleeding was seen with 72 cases (42.6%). Procedure-related mortality was 0%. Late procedure-related complications requiring further endoscopic procedures occurred in 8.2% (tube occlusion: 5.3%, tube dislocation: 2.9%). Our 7-day mortality was 0% and 5 patients died within 30 days, usually from the disease itself. Those surviving the procedure (more than 7 days) had a mean survival of 209 days. Esophageal plastic stents can be accurately and safely placed under direct endoscopic control with lower costs. Therefore, endoscopic intubation remains a useful palliative treatment for patients with unresectable carcinoma of the esophagus.

Prior radiation and/or chemotherapy has no effect on the outcome of metal stent placement for oesophagogastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

It is still unclear whether prior radiation and/or chemotherapy (RTCT) increases the risk of complications after the placement of self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable oesophagogastric carcinoma. We evaluated the influence of prior RTCT on the outcome of stent placement in a large group of patients.

METHODS

From October 1994 to December 2000, 200 patients underwent placement of self-expanding metal stents for malignant dysphagia, and were followed prospectively. Forty-nine of these patients had received prior RTCT (chemotherapy n = 35, radiation therapy n = 8, or both n = 6).

RESULTS

At 4 weeks after stenting, the dysphagia score had improved similarly in patients with or without prior RTCT, from a median of 3 to 0 (P < 0.001). The occurrence of major complications (bleeding, perforation, fistula formation, fever and severe pain) was not different between patients with or without prior RTCT (29% vs 21%; relative risk (RR) = 1.15 (95% CI 0.54-2.46; P = 0.72)), as was the occurrence of recurrent dysphagia due to tumour overgrowth, stent migration, or impaction of a food bolus (35% vs 27%; RR = 1.49 (95% CI 0.71-3.13; P = 0.29)). Median survival of both patient groups after stent placement was similar (110 vs 93 days; RR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.60-1.34; P = 0.60) for prior RTCT versus no prior treatment). Only minor complications (mainly mild retrosternal pain) occurred more frequently in patients with prior RTCT (41% vs 15%; RR = 2.12 (95% CI 1.06-4.25; P = 0.035)).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the incidence of life-threatening complications and survival after placement of self-expanding metal stents for oesophagogastric carcinoma are not affected by prior RTCT, but retrosternal pain occurs more frequently in patients who had previously undergone RTCT.

Management of Tracheoesophageal Fistulas in Adults

The approach to treatment of adult patients with tracheoesophageal fistulas depends on whether the fistula is congenital or acquired in origin. Most adults have acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas, and treatment depends on whether the fistula is a result of a benign process or a malignancy, with the latter usually primary esophageal cancer. For patients with benign tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment is almost always initially supportive followed by definitive surgical correction. In general, depending on the size and location of the tracheal aspect of the fistula, surgical therapy involves primary repair of the fistula and, if necessary, resection and reconstruction of the trachea. For patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas, treatment depends on whether the patient is resectable and/or medically fit for surgical therapy. However, most patients with malignant trach-eoesophageal fistulas have advanced disease and can only be treated with palliative measures. The current standard of palliative therapy for patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas is the endoscopic or radiologic placement of covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS), which allow closure of the fistula. All three types of commercially available covered SEMS have been used in this capacity with success. Other, less common treatment options for selected patients with malignant tracheoesophageal fistulas include chemotherapy and radiation, surgical bypass, esophageal exclusion, and fistula resection and repair.

N/A

N/A

Self-expanding metal stents for complicated and recurrent esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Fewer complications are encountered with the use of self-expanding metal stents compared with semirigid prostheses in the palliation of patients with malignant esophagogastric obstructions. Metal stents can also be used to treat patients with complicated and/or recurrent esophagogastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Covered metal stents were placed in 57 patients for the following reasons: esophagorespiratory fistula (n = 16), recurrent carcinoma in a gastric tube interposition (n = 21), recurrent carcinoma after partial (n = 4) or total (n = 6) gastrectomy, or a carcinoma near the upper esophageal sphincter (n = 10).

RESULTS

The procedure was technically successful in 55 of 57 (96%) patients. Dysphagia score improved from a mean of 3.6 to 1.6 (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 13 (23%) patients. In all cases, esophagorespiratory fistulas were occluded. Tumor recurred in 5 of 16 patients with a fistula, 8 of 21 patients after gastric tube interposition, 3 of 10 patients after gastrectomy, and 2 of 10 patients with a tumor immediately distal to the upper esophageal sphincter. Median survival was 61 days. Prior radiation, chemotherapy, or both increased the risk of specific stent-related complications in relation to the (neo)esophagus (6 of 16 [38%] versus 4 of 41 [10%]: odds ratio, 5.5: 95% CI [1.3, 24], p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stents are effective and relatively safe for palliation of patients with malignancy and dysphagia caused by fistula formation, postoperative recurrence, and tumors near the upper esophageal sphincter. Placement should be considered at an early stage in these conditions.

A comparison of 3 types of covered metal stents for the palliation of patients with dysphagia caused by esophagogastric carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

There are currently 3 types of covered metal stents available in Europe for palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia. Their relative merits have not been compared in a prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with esophagogastric carcinoma were randomized to placement of an Ultraflex stent, a Flamingo Wallstent, or a Gianturco-Z stent. Malignant strictures of the esophagus were treated by insertion of a small-diameter stent (n = 71), whereas those involving the gastric cardia were treated with a large-diameter stent (n = 29).

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, dysphagia had improved in all patient groups (p < 0.001), but the degree of improvement did not differ among the 3 groups (p = 0.14). There were differences among the 3 stent types with respect to major complications (Ultraflex stent: 8/34 [24%], Flamingo Wallstent: 6/33 [18%], and Gianturco-Z stent: 12/33 [36%]), but these were not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Nine patients (26%) with an Ultraflex stent, 11 (33%) with a Flamingo Wallstent, and 8 (24%) with a Gianturco-Z stent had recurrent dysphagia (p = 0.73), mainly because of tumor overgrowth or stent migration; 12 of 13 episodes of migration involved small-diameter stents in the esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 covered metal stents evaluated offer the same degree of palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia. Placement of Gianturco-Z stents was associated with more complications as compared with Ultraflex stents and Flamingo Wallstents. Although stent migration is reduced by increasing stent diameter, tumor overgrowth remains an intractable problem that requires a new approach.

Placement of PEG tubes through previously placed self-expanding esophageal metal stents

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding metal stents are frequently used to palliate patients with malignant dysphagia and close tracheoesophageal fistulae. Despite proper stent positioning and deployment, in a subset of patients there is no improvement in dysphagia, closure of tracheoesophageal fistulae, or resolution of anorexia. Such patients may require a PEG tube. It has been suggested that PEG placement through a preexisting esophageal stent is problematic because of the risks of gastrostomy tube impaction within the stent and resultant stent migration.

METHODS

Case records were retrospectively reviewed of 9 consecutive patients with indwelling esophageal self-expanding metal stents undergoing attempted PEG.

OBSERVATIONS

PEG tube placement was successful in all patients. In 1 patient, the stent migrated distally into the stomach during PEG placement. This was managed endoscopically without further complication.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG placement in patients with previously placed esophageal self-expanding metal stents is a relatively safe and feasible procedure, although stent migration may occur.

Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy

Endoscopy is extremely valuable in the evaluation of disorders of the luminal gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and biliary system. Endoscopy as a medical discipline continues to evolve and is becoming increasingly therapeutic in nature. Minimally invasive endoscopic intervention now is effective in a wide variety of disorders, including gastrointestinal hemorrhage, obstructive diseases of the intestinal or biliary tree, and early detection or prevention of neoplastic disease of the colon and esophagus. The development of EUS technology has expanded greatly the potential utility of endoscopy as a diagnostic and a therapeutic modality, and further technologic advances are anticipated.

Are self-expanding metal mesh stents useful in the treatment of benign esophageal stenoses and fistulas? An experience of four cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the long-term results of treating benign esophageal fistula and stenosis using self-expanding metal stents.

METHODS

We treated four patients using covered mesh or coiled stents. We removed the stents electively in two patients (one endoscopically and one during planned partial esophagectomy) and unexpectedly in one patient who developed bleeding. One stent migrated and required laparotomy for removal.

RESULTS

Placement of self-expanding metal stents successfully sealed the benign fistula in two patients and reestablished swallowing in two other patients with complicated achalasia. Two patients were swallowing normally on long-term follow-up, one died of the underlying disease, and one required gastrostomy.

CONCLUSION

Temporary use of self-expanding metal stents as a feasible option for treating benign esophageal stenosis and fistula in patients who have failed other conventional treatments.

A new design metal stent (Flamingo stent) for palliation of malignant dysphagia: a prospective study. The Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

Metal stents are not superior to conventional endoprostheses with respect to the incidence of recurrent dysphagia because of tumor ingrowth with uncovered stents and migration with their covered counterparts. To overcome these limitations, a partially covered (inside-out covering) metal stent with a conical shape and a varying braiding angle of the mesh along its length, the Flamingo stent, has been developed.

METHODS

From March 1997 to October 1997, 40 consecutive patients with dysphagia due to malignant tumors had either a small diameter (proximal/distal diameter 24/16 mm; n = 21) or a large diameter Flamingo stent (proximal/distal diameter 30/20 mm; n = 19) placed.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant improvement in dysphagia, but improvement was not greater with large diameter stents compared to small diameter stents (p = 0.21). Major complications (bleeding [4], perforation [1], fever [1] and fistula [1]) occurred in 7 (18%) patients. Large diameter stents tended to be associated with more major complications than small diameter stents (5 vs. 2; p = 0.07). Pain following stent placement was observed in 9 (22%) patients and occurred more frequently in those who had prior radiation and/or chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Recurrent dysphagia (mainly due to tumor overgrowth) occurred in 10 (25%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Flamingo stents are effective for palliation of malignant dysphagia, but the large diameter stent seems to be associated with more complications involving the esophagus than the small diameter stent. Because recurrent dysphagia is mainly due to tumor progression, further technical developments in stent design are needed.

Endoscopic therapeutic esophageal interventions

Cyanoacrylat and fibrin glue seem to be no better alternatives to ligation in the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. Studies with photodynamic therapy (PDT) of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal cancer show encouraging results. The use of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) as a photosensitizer minimizes the rate of severe side effects, but only in HGD and tumors with a depth of 2 mm or less can a complete remission be achieved. The use of Lugol's iodine solution is sensible for the detection of HGD and early squamous cell cancers. Thermal ablation with Neodym:YAG laser and self-expanding metal stents are the most important modalities for palliative treatment of esophageal cancer.

Extraction of migrated self-expanding esophageal metal stents

BACKGROUND

When self-expanding metal stents are used in the palliative treatment of malignant stenoses complications can occur and require the endoscopic extraction of the stent.

METHODS

Three Gianturco-Z stents and two EsophaCoil stents had to be extracted because of migration (4 patients) and strangulation of healthy esophageal tissue between the coil loops during EsophaCoil stent release (1 patient). Because of the strong expansion force of the Gianturco-Z stent, the plastic sheath of a polypectomy snare was replaced by the steel sheath of a basket used for mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones. The sufficient resistance of the steel sheath allowed the stents to be compressed. The EsophaCoil stents were gradually retracted with a polypectomy snare over a plastic tube.

RESULTS

All stents could be extracted successfully. There were no severe complications related to extraction.

CONCLUSION

By means of the endoscopic extraction techniques described above, it is possible to safely remove self-expanding esophageal stents.

Upper gastrointestinal tract malignant obstruction: initial results of palliation with a flexible covered stent

The authors treated 21 patients with inoperable upper gastrointestinal tract malignant obstruction from the esophagus to the duodenum by means of intubation with a flexible covered stent with fluoroscopic guidance. Stent placement was successful and relief of dysphagia was immediate in 18 (86%) patients, without serious complication. The average dysphagia score decreased from 2.6 (dysphagia to liquids) to 1.0 (dysphagia to normal solid food). Placement of a flexible covered stent provides easy, safe, and effective palliation of upper gastrointestinal malignant obstruction.

Esophageal fistula sealing: choice of stent, practical management, and cost

BACKGROUND

Three models of covered metal stents are available to seal esophageal fistulas.

METHODS

Stainless steel covered stents were inserted in 5 patients (group I); nitinol covered stents were inserted in 12 patients (group II) with malignant (n = 14) or benign (n = 3) esophageal fistulas.

RESULTS

Stent positioning was satisfactory in all cases. Fistula sealing was complete in 1 of 5 (20%) and 12 of 12 (100%) patients of groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.005). Continued esophageal leakage was initially related to the passage of fluids alongside the stent covering (n = 3) and to early stent migration (n = 1). Complications related to stent placement were observed in 2 of 17 (12%) patients and were fatal. During follow-up (mean 153 +/- 143 days), esophageal fistulas relapsed after initial sealing in 5 of 13 (38%) patients. Further treatment (glue or fibrin sealant injection, additional stent insertion) was attempted in 7 cases of persistent or relapsing esophageal fistula, with sealing obtained in 5 of them. The costs per patient and per day free from symptoms due to the esophageal fistula were $106 and $57 in groups I and II, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nitinol covered stents more frequently provided complete esophageal fistula sealing, as compared with stainless steel covered stents. Further treatments tailored to the mechanisms of fistula persistence or relapse often provided sealing.

Palliative treatment of malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas with Gianturco-Z stents. A prospective clinical trial and review of the literature on covered metal stents

OBJECTIVE

Esophagorespiratory fistulas, especially in the upper third of the esophagus, are a complication of malignant esophageal tumors, which are difficult to manage. The efficacy of polyurethane-covered, self-expanding metal stents for palliation of malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas was investigated prospectively.

METHODS

Eleven patients with malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas resp. perforations were treated with Gianturco-Z stents. In five patients the lesion was located in the proximal part of the esophagus. Because of the fistula all patients suffered from dysphagia even for liquids.

RESULTS

No technical problems during the implantation procedure of the stents occurred. In the control radiography with water-soluble contrast media, the fistulas were completely sealed in 10 of 11 patients. Therefore the dysphagia score improved from 3.0 to 0.6. Nearly all Gianturco-Z stents (10/11) showed a sufficient expansion within 24 h after placement. Severe early or late complications were not encountered, with the exception of tumor overgrowth in one patient about 9 months after stent placement. In five patients, short term (3-6 days) retrosternal pain was observed, and one patient complained of slight foreign body sensation. By August 1997 all 11 patients had died of advanced disease, with a median survival time of 121 days (range, 22-300 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Gianturco-Z stents are highly effective for palliative treatment of esophagorespiratory fistula resp. perforations and have a low complication rate. Due to the fact that this stent shows no retraction during the release, a precise positioning is possible, especially in the case of tumors and fistulas in the upper third of the esophagus. It seems that use of the Gianturco-Z stent can be considered a good therapeutic method for palliative endoscopic treatment of this high risk patient group.