Ultrasound detection of blunt splenic injury

A Case of Splenic Laceration Presenting as a Delayed Complication of Colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is a frequently performed medical procedure; complications associated with this procedure often present to the emergency department (ED). Splenic laceration is a rare but life-threatening complication of colonoscopy. We report the unique case of a patient with a splenic laceration who presented after a recent colonoscopy and had no history of trauma.

CASE REPORT

A 52-year-old man presented to our ED with abdominal pain and lightheadedness the day after a routine colonoscopy. Ultrasound demonstrated hemoperitoneum, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a large hemoperitoneum with active contrast extravasation from the laceration of the superior pole of the spleen. After resuscitation, the patient was managed with an emergency splenectomy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Colonoscopy complications are frequently identified and managed in the ED. Splenic laceration should be on the differential for patients that present with abdominal pain or hypotension after colonoscopy. Splenic injury carries a high mortality risk, and prompt, accurate diagnosis can be lifesaving.

Delayed Rupture of Occult Splenic Injury: a Case Report

We report on a case of splenic rupture that presented eleven days after a trivial injury. Possible explanations of the delay in presentation and ways for early detection are discussed. Emergency physicians should always bear this entity in mind before discharging patients with left thoracoabdominal injury.

Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.

Screening Ultrasound in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Ultrasound is used worldwide to evaluate patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Sometimes referred to as an extension of the physical exam, ultrasound can rapidly help distinguish patients with injury requiring computerized tomography (CT) or surgery (typically 5%-10%) from those with no abdominal injury (> 90%). Ultrasound has several advantages in the setting of trauma. It is portable, integrates easily into the resuscitation of trauma victims without causing delay in therapy, is noninvasive, and has no associated morbidity. Limitations of ultrasound include its dependence on operator skill and technique, poor image quality in patients with morbid obesity or extensive subcutaneous gas, limited visualization of the retroperitoneum, and less reliable localization of visceral injury compared to CT. Successful use of abdominal ultrasound in the setting of trauma can be maximized with adequate sonographer training, appreciation of technical limitations, and adherence to an appropriate trauma ultrasound protocol.

New and old tools for abdominal imaging in critically ill patients

Diagnostic imaging technology has advanced considerably during the past two decades. Different imaging techniques have been proposed for abdominal imaging in critically ill patients like plain radiography, sonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. Sonography has been proven to be effective to detect free intra-peritoneal fluid and it is considered one of the primary diagnostic modalities for abdominal evaluation for trauma assessment. In our opinion sonography should replace other invasive techniques to rapidly triage blunt trauma patients with unstable vital signs and examine the peritoneal cavity as a site of major haemorrhage to expedite exploratory laparotomy. On the other hand, CT has become the imaging modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients with multisystem blunt and penetrating trauma. New developments in the quantitative analysis of the CT images will improve our knowledge of pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic management of abdominal pathologies in critically ill patients.

Elongated left lobe of the liver mimicking a subcapsular hematoma of the spleen on the focused assessment with sonography for trauma exam

The focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination has assumed the role of initial screening examination for the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in the patient with blunt abdominal trauma. Sonographic pitfalls associated with the examination have primarily been related to mistaking contained fluid collections with hemoperitoneum. We present a case in which an elongated left lobe of the liver was misdiagnosed as a splenic subcapsular hematoma. It is imperative that emergency physicians and trauma surgeons be familiar with this normal variant of the liver and its associated sonographic appearance on the perisplenic window in order to prevent nontherapeutic laparotomies or embolizations.

Splenectomy in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: A comparison of sonographic correlation with intra-operative findings in trauma

BACKGROUND

Missed or inappropriately-treated splenic injury is a significant cause of preventable trauma-related death. Physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography are essential tools for early diagnosis of splenic injury. However, some injuries may not be accurately diagnosed by ultrasonography at initial evaluation.

AIM

The aim of this study was to audit indications for splenectomy at the University College Hospital, Ibadan and to compare the intra-operative findings in trauma-related cases with the sonographic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all adult (12 years and older) patients' records who had splenectomy between July 2003 and June 2010. The data extracted included patient demographics and indications for splenectomy. In trauma cases, the mode of injury and vital signs at presentation, sonographic findings, and operation findings were recorded. The intervals between injury and sonography and duration to surgery were also noted respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were reviewed in the 7-year review period. The male to female ratio was approximately 2:1. The ages ranged from 14 to 76 years with a peak incidence in the third decade. Elective indications for splenectomy were 14 (16.6%), while 70 (83.3%) were emergency cases. Forty-four of the trauma-related patients had pre-operative abdominal ultrasound, of which 31 (70%) was reported as sonographically normal prior to surgery, while the rest of the trauma-related cases were considered too ill for ultrasonography.

CONCLUSION

Potentially significant injuries may be missed with screening sonography. For this reason, a physician must maintain a high index of suspicion and consider the patient's clinical status or an alternative imaging modality in excluding a diagnosis of splenic injury.

Bedside ultrasound education in pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs in the United States

OBJECTIVES

As the use of bedside ultrasound becomes more prevalent in pediatric emergency departments, the need for a national curriculum for fellows' training in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) has increased. The objectives of this study were to describe the current state of bedside ultrasound education among existing PEM fellowship programs and to explore the interest in a national curriculum.

METHODS

A 20-question survey was sent to all 57 PEM fellowship directors in the United States in February 2011. Weekly reminders were sent for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The response rate was 58% (33/57). Although 91% of respondents reported having an ultrasound machine available, only 16% reported an ultrasound curriculum designed specifically for PEM. Another 25% reported no curriculum, and 28% use a curriculum designed for general emergency medicine physicians. Most (>83%) directors thought an ultrasound curriculum for PEM fellows should include the focused assessment with sonography for trauma, bladder size assessment, soft tissue foreign body localization, skin and soft tissue infection evaluation, guidance for central and peripheral line insertion, and arthrocentesis. Some directors (40%-68%) thought that cardiac ultrasound, thoracic ultrasound, abdominal ultrasound, lumbar puncture guidance, fracture reduction, nerve blocks, and testicular ultrasounds should also be included. Forty-two percent plan to create a bedside ultrasound curriculum in the next 5 years, and 40% reported the lack of a national curriculum as a barrier to creating a curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside ultrasound use in pediatric emergency departments is very common, and PEM fellowship directors would welcome the development of a standard curriculum.

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs).

METHODS

We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-84%); specificity, 96% (95% CI 95%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95% CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95% CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66% (95% CI 56%-75%); specificity, 95% (95% CI 93%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.

Clinician-performed focused sonography for the resuscitation of trauma

Traumatic death remains pandemic. The majority of preventable deaths occur early and are due to injuries or physiologic derangements in the airway, thoracoabdominal cavities, or brain. Ultrasound is a noninvasive and portable imaging modality that spans a spectrum between the physical examination and diagnostic imaging. It allows trained examiners to immediately confirm important syndromes and answer clinical questions. Newer technologies greatly increase the fidelity, accessibility, ease of use, and informatic manipulation of the results. The early bedside use of focused ultrasound as the initial imaging modality used to detect hemoperitoneum and hemopericardium in the resuscitation of the injured patient has become an accepted standard of care. Widespread dissemination of basic ultrasound skills and technology to facilitate this brings ultrasound to many resuscitative and critical care areas. Although not as widely appreciated, the focused use of ultrasound may also have a role in detecting hemothoraces and pneumothoraces, guiding airway management, and detecting increased intracranial pressure. Intensivists generally utilize a treating philosophy that requires the real-time integration of many divergent sources of information regarding their patients' anatomy and physiology. They are therefore positioned to take advantage of focused resuscitative ultrasound, which offers immediate diagnostic information in the early care of the critically injured.

Novel applications of ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine

A new field, termed emergency ultrasound (EUS), has recently been established. The past decade saw rapid development in the field of EUS in adult patients, especially as performed by emergency medicine physicians. Ultrasound imaging offers several advantages over traditional radiographic techniques, many of which are especially relevant to patients in the pediatric emergency department. Recent literature has documented increased use of EUS for pediatric patients. This review will examine basic principles of ultrasound relevant to pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the instrument and its limitations. In addition, we will review recent developments in this field. It is our goal that the reader will gain an understanding of the strengths and limitations of this instrument and will therefore be in a position to plan their own program in EUS in pediatrics. Furthermore, it is hoped that this review will serve as an impetus for innovative research, to refine and extend the indications of this modality to benefit patients in the pediatric emergency department.

Appearance of Solid Organ Injury with Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of injury and characterize imaging findings of contrast-enhanced sonography and non-contrast-enhanced sonography in the setting of confirmed solid organ injury.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This prospective study involved identifying hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries on contrast-enhanced CT. After injury identification, both non-contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography were performed to identify the possible injury and to analyze the appearance of the injury. The sonographic appearance of hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries was then analyzed, and the conspicuity of the injuries was graded on a scale from 0 (nonvisualization) to 3 (high visualization).

RESULTS

Non-contrast-enhanced sonography revealed 11 (50%) of 22 injuries, whereas contrast-enhanced sonography depicted 20 (91%) of 22 injuries. The average grade for conspicuity of injuries was increased from 0.67 to 2.33 for spleen injuries and from 1.0 to 2.2 for liver injuries comparing non-contrast-enhanced with contrast-enhanced sonography, respectively, on a scale from 0, being nonvisualization, to 3, being high visualization. The splenic injuries appeared hypoechoic with occasional areas of normal enhancing splenic tissue within the laceration with contrast-enhanced sonography. Different patterns were observed in liver injuries including a central hypoechoic region. In some liver injuries there was a surrounding hyperechoic region.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced sonography greatly enhances visualization of liver and spleen injuries compared with non-contrast-enhanced sonography. Solid organ injuries usually appeared hypoechoic on contrast-enhanced sonography, but often a hyperechoic region surrounding the injury also was identified with liver injuries.

Feasibility of FAST examination performance with ultrasound contrast

The Focused Abdominal Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination has several limitations, among which is the inability to reliably detect solid organ injury. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound contrast use during a FAST examination and its effect on the ability to delineate vasculature in the spleen and liver from hilum to capsule on simulated patients. This prospective observational case control study was conducted at an urban community hospital Emergency Department (ED) that is a level I trauma facility. During a FAST examination, the liver and spleen were scanned in entirety to evaluate contrast opacification of blood vessels and a latent phase highlighting the parenchyma of the liver and spleen. Each physician, hospital credentialed for the use of emergency ultrasound, scanned the liver and spleen both before and after contrast administration. Five milliliters of contrast were mixed with 16 mL of normal saline and then injected 4 mL at a time through an 18-gauge anticubital catheter. All examinations were successfully completed before contrast agent dissipation. The mean time to complete the FAST examination with interrogation of the liver and spleen was 1 min 42 s (range 1 min 22 s to 2 min 5 s). The mean time to initial visualization of contrast was 15 s (range 12 to 18 s). The latent phase of the ultrasound contrast when the liver or spleen began to shimmer, an effect that would outline hematomas not actively bleeding, occurred at a mean time of 54 s (range 45 s to 1 min 9 s). The ultrasound contrast disappeared at a mean of 2 min 52 s (range of 2 min 16 s to 3 min 33 s). In conclusion, ultrasound contrast use is feasible during the FAST examination and allows enhanced evaluation of solid organ parenchyma during evaluation for solid organ injury.

Blunt trauma to the spleen: ultrasonographic findings

The spleen is the most frequently injured organ in adults who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Splenic trauma accounts for approximately 25% to 30% of all intra-abdominal injuries. The management of splenic injury has undergone rapid change over the last decade, with increasing emphasis on splenic salvage and non-operative management. Identifying the presence and degree of splenic injury is critical in triaging the management of patients. Imaging is integral in the identification of splenic injuries, both at the time of injury and during follow-up. Although CT remains the gold standard in blunt abdominal trauma, US continues to play an important role in assessing the traumatized spleen. This pictorial review illustrates the various ultrasonographic appearances of the traumatized spleen. Correlation with other imaging is presented and complications that occur during follow-up are described.

Bedside emergency ultrasonographic diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture in blunt abdominal trauma

Abdominal injury from significant blunt trauma can include injury to bowel, kidneys, liver, and spleen. In approximately 5% of all injuries one of the diaphragms is ruptured. Diaphragmatic rupture may not be easily detected and this can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. Rupture may be suggested on chest X-ray film especially with abnormal nasogastric tube location but the accuracy of this method is modest only. Abdominal computed tomography is not accurate and magnetic resonance imaging, although very sensitive and specific, is not feasible in most trauma situations. Surgeons have often resorted to exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy to make the diagnosis. Although not typically part of the basic Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination, ultrasonographic diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture is possible with little added time to the examination. We present 3 cases of diaphragmatic rupture discovered shortly after the patients' arrival, on initial trauma evaluation with the FAST. A discussion of previous literature and ultrasound technique for diagnosis follows the cases.

“Bomb Explosion On The Nis Express” – Lessons From A Major Incident, Kosovo 16 Feb 2001

On Friday 16 February 2001, terrorists detonated a bomb under a civilian coach travelling from Nis in Serbia to Gracanica in Kosovo. 10 people were killed at the scene. 13 casualties were treated in the British KFOR hospital (Reynolds Hospital) in Pristina. Another 8 casualties were evacuated to the American KFOR hospital at Camp Bondsteel. The incident provided a unique opportunity for co-operation between British, American, Russian, German and French KFOR hospitals, as well as with Serbian clinicians and forensic pathologists. This article analyses the medical management of this major incident, identifies the lessons to be learned from it, and also provides enough detail for teaching scenarios.

Ultrasound in abdominal trauma

This article reviews current issues regarding the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination. Technical performance issues, decision-making and practice algorithms, fluid volume and scoring systems, proficiency and training, and the role of the FAST in pediatric trauma are covered. This article examines the FAST examination from a practical, evidenced-based stand-point.

Emergency ultrasound in trauma patients

US will be used more frequently in the future for the evaluation of traumatized patients. Previously,the main focus of the sonographic examination was for the detection of free fluid. Unstable patients with free fluid often can be triaged to the operation room without further imaging tests. In patients who are more stable or in whom US results are negative, CT is required. Based on recent studies, sonography has a sensitivity rate of approximately 40% in direct detection of solid organ injuries. In the future, however, with the use of contrast-enhanced agents, sonography may more reliably detect solid organ injuries. Within the chest, US has been shown to be helpful in detecting pleural effusions and may be useful in detecting pericardial effusions. US has been shown to be sensitive in detecting pneumothoraces in traumatized patients.

Sonographic patterns of intraperitoneal hemorrhage associated with blunt splenic injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between sonographic detection of free fluid in the left upper quadrant and blunt splenic injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive emergency blunt trauma sonograms obtained at a level I trauma center from January 1995 to January 2001. Data were collected on demographics, free fluid location, and patient outcome. Injuries were determined from computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, laparotomy, or a combination thereof.

RESULTS

A total of 4320 blunt trauma sonograms were obtained, and 596 patients (14%) had intra-abdominal injuries. The mean age was 33.7 +/- 19.1 years (range, 1-95 years), with 294 (49%) male and 302 (51%) female. There was no statistical difference between age, sex, or mechanism for all subgroups. There were 409 true-positive, 187 false-negative, 88 false-positive, and 3636 true-negative findings. Sensitivity of sonography for detecting all intra-abdominal injuries was 68%, and specificity was 97.6%; sensitivity for detecting isolated splenic injuries was 73.8%. Locations of free fluid in patients with nonsplenic injuries were compared with those in patients with splenic injuries. Isolated left upper quadrant free fluid was significantly associated with splenic injury (odds ratio = 3.0; P = .002), followed by diffuse free fluid (odds ratio = 2.1; P = .005). A subanalysis of isolated splenic injuries also revealed a significant association with left upper quadrant free fluid (odds ratio = 3.1; P = .007) and diffuse free fluid (odds ratio = 2.7; P = .0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Free fluid in the left upper quadrant is significantly associated with splenic injury. This finding should triage patients more rapidly to computed tomography, angiography, embolization, and laparotomy.

Splenic trauma: evaluation with contrast-specific sonography and a second-generation contrast medium: preliminary experience

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience in the assessment of splenic trauma with contrast-coded sonography and a second-generation contrast medium.

METHODS

From January to May 2002, 120 patients were studied with sonography for suspected splenic trauma. Twenty-five were selected for further imaging because of sonographic findings positive for splenic injury, findings positive for peritoneal fluid only, indeterminate findings, and negative findings with high clinical or laboratory suspicion. These patients underwent contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.

RESULTS

Among the 25 patients studied, 6 had no spleen trauma at initial and follow-up evaluation. One patient had a hypoperfused spleen without parenchymal damage, and 18 had splenic injuries; these 19 patients were considered positive. Hemoperitoneum was identified by sonography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in 74% of the 19 positive cases. Perisplenic clots were recognized in 58% of the cases by computed tomography and in 42% by baseline and enhanced sonography. Splenic infarctions were found in 11% of cases by contrast-enhanced sonography and computed tomography; none was found by unenhanced sonography. Parenchymal traumatic lesions were identified in 12 of 18 patients with splenic injuries by unenhanced sonography, in 17 cases by contrast-enhanced sonography, and in all 18 cases by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A minimal splenic lesion was found in the single patient with a false-negative contrast-enhanced sonographic finding. Contrast-enhanced sonography correlated appreciably better than unenhanced sonography in detecting injuries and in estimating their extent. Findings undetectable on unenhanced sonography were also noted: splenic hypoperfusion in 11% of positive cases on both contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography, contrast medium pooling in 21% of cases on both contrast-enhanced sonography and computed tomography, and contrast extravasation in 11% of cases on computed tomography and 5% on contrast-enhanced sonography.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced sonography is a promising tool in the assessment of splenic trauma. In institutions where sonography is used as the initial procedure, this technique may increase its effectiveness.

The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan: pearls and pitfalls

OBJECTIVE

To review the state-of-the-art use of sonography in evaluating the patient with trauma.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience in performing more than 5000 sonographic examinations in the patient with trauma. The recent experience of other publications advocating newer applications of sonography in the patient with trauma are discussed and presented in a pictorial fashion.

RESULTS

The main focus of sonography in the patient with trauma has been in performance of the focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan. The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan is usually performed in the patient with blunt abdominal trauma and is used to check for free fluid in the abdomen or pelvis. There are certain pitfalls that need to be avoided and certain limitations of the focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan that need to be recognized. These pitfalls and limitations are reviewed. More recently, sonography has been used to detect certain solid-organ injuries that have a variety of appearances. Thus, sonography may be used to localize the specific site of injury in these patients. More recently, sonography has been used to evaluate thoracic abnormalities in patients with trauma, including pleural effusions, pneumothoraces, and pericardial effusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of sonography in evaluating the patient with trauma has rapidly expanded in the past decade. Those using sonography in this group of patients should be aware of its many uses but also its potential pitfalls and limitations.

The hand-held FAST: experience with hand-held trauma sonography in a level-I urban trauma center

AIMS

To describe the effectiveness of a portable hand-held ultrasound machine when used by clinicians in the early evaluation and resuscitation of trauma victims.

METHODS

The study was a prospective evaluation in a level-I urban trauma center. The focussed assessment with sonography for trauma is a specifically defined examination for free fluid known as the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) exam. Seventy-one patients had a hand-held FAST (HHFAST) examination performed with a Sonosite 180, 2.4 kg ultrasound machine. Sixty-seven examinations were immediately repeated with a Toshiba SSH 140A portable floor-based machine. This repeat scan (formal FAST or FFAST) was used as a comparison standard between the devices for study purposes. Four patients had a HHFAST only, all with positive result, two being taken for immediate laparotomy, and two having a follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scan. Patient follow-up from other imaging studies, operative intervention, and clinical outcomes were also compared to the performance of each device.

RESULTS

There were 58 victims of blunt, and 13 of penetrating abdominal trauma. One examination was indeterminate using both machines. The apparent HHFAST performance yielded; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictable value, and accuracy (S, S, PPV, NPV, A) of 83, 100, 100, 98, 98%. Upon review, a CT scan finding and benign clinical course found the HHFAST diagnosis to be correct rather than the FFAST in one case. Considering the ultimate clinical course of the patients, yielded a (S, S, PPV, NPV, A) of 78, 100, 100, 97, and 97% for the HHFAST and 75, 98, 86, 97, and 96% for the FFAST. Statistically, there was no significant difference in the actual performance of the HHFAST compared to the FFAST in this clinical setting.

DISCUSSION

Hand-held portable sonography can simplify early and accurate performance of FAST exams in victims of abdominal trauma.

Clinical application of serial operations with preserving spleen

AIM: To evaluate the clinical application of serial operations with preservation of spleen.

METHODS: Serial operations with preserving spleen were performed on 211 cases in our hospital from 1980 to 2000. The patient’s age ranged from 13 to 56 years, averaging 38 years. Diseases included splenic injury in 171 cases, portal hypertension in 9 cases, splenic cyst in 10 cases, and the lesion of pancreatic body and tail in 21 cases.

RESULTS: All the cases were cured, and 129 patients were followe dup from 3 mo to 3 years with the leukocyte phagocytosis test, detection of immunoglubin, CT, ^99mTc scanning and ultrasonography. The results were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION: The operations with preserving spleen were safe, feasible, and worth of clinical application.

From the RSNA refresher courses: focused abdominal US for trauma

Focused abdominal ultrasonography (US) has been introduced in Europe as a method to evaluate blunt abdominal trauma. The main focus of the examination is detection of free fluid in the abdomen secondary to injury of the abdominal organs. The examination takes only a few minutes to perform. In the authors' experience, trauma patients in unstable condition and in whom significant free fluid is detected are immediately taken to the operating room for surgical exploration without undergoing computed tomographic (CT) correlation. The authors have also used US to identify the specific site of organ injury. Injuries to solid organs such as the liver, spleen, and kidney that are identified with US usually appear heterogeneous or hyperechoic. A hematoma surrounding the injured organ may appear echogenic or hypoechoic. However, pitfalls of focused abdominal US for trauma include failure to show contained solid-organ injuries; injuries to the diaphragm, pancreas, and adrenal gland; and some bowel injuries. Thus, negative findings at US do not exclude an intraperitoneal injury, and close clinical observation or CT is warranted.