Fine wire frame arthrodesis for the salvage of severe ankle pathology

Complex Ankle Fusion With Circular Frames: Factors Influencing Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Circular frames for ankle fusion are reserved for complex clinical scenarios. The literature is heterogenous and conflicting. We aim to present the indications and outcomes of this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiologic and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiologic and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

47 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20-40). The median age at time of surgery was 63.5 years (IQR 58-71). Patients had a median of 2 previous surgeries (IQR 1-3). The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days (IQR 166-280). Simultaneous limb lengthening (median 3.3 cm, IQR 1.9-3.5) was performed in 11 patients, increasing the EFT by a mean of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7%, respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. In addition, 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and reoperations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT.

CONCLUSION

Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes, however time in frame may be prolonged with a high rate of adverse events. Identified risk factors for poorer outcomes should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic.

Versatility of Ilizarov technique in difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthrodesis is a well-established procedure that has been successfully used for treatment of end stage arthritis of the ankle for well over a century. Internal fixation for ankle arthrodesis is adequate in most of the cases. However, surgeons and patients are occasionally confronted with cases in need for ankle arthrodesis but do not lend itself well to the ideal position and/or internal fixation. These cases may even contraindicate internal fixation. The aim of this study is to assess the results of ankle arthrodesis using different modalities of Ilizarov techniques and demonstrating its high versatility in treating such difficult cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study. Thirty cases of ankle fusion for end stage arthritis or instability were performed in the period between January 2002 and December 2007 at the Health Insurance Reference Hospitals, Alexandria, Egypt. Tibiotalar fusion was done in 22 cases and tibiocalcaneal fusion in 8 cases using different modalities of Ilizarov technique. The mean follow up period was 5.5 years (range 4-8, SD 1.9).

RESULTS

Sound and painless fusion was achieved in all the cases except one (97%). The difference between the mean preoperative and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) was found to be statistically highly significant (t=10.1, p=0.001). Many minor complications were encountered during the course of treatment in the form of: pin tract infections, wound dehiscence, cellulitis that was managed effectively with local wound care, oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

The versatility of the combinations of assemblies afforded by Ilizarov fixator was found to be endless. This makes the Ilizarov fixator to be an effective and versatile mean of treating difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis.

Outcome of arthrodesis of the hindfoot as a salvage procedure for complex ankle pathology using the Ilizarov technique

Achieving arthrodesis of the ankle can be difficult in the presence of infection, deformity, poor soft tissues and bone loss. We present a series of 48 patients with complex ankle pathology, treated with the Ilizarov technique. Infection was present in 30 patients and 30 had significant deformity before surgery. Outcome was assessed clinically and with patient-reported outcome measures (Modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (MAOFAS) scale and the Short-Form (SF-36)).

Arthrodesis was achieved in 40 patients with the Ilizarov technique alone and in six further patients with additional surgery. Infection was eradicated in all patients at a mean follow-up of 46.6 months (13 to 162). Successful arthrodesis was less likely in those with comorbidities and in tibiocalcaneal fusion compared with tibiotalar fusion.

These patients had poor general health scores compared with the normal population before surgery. The mean MAOFAS score improved significantly from 24.3 (0 to 90) pre-operatively to 56.2 (30 to 90) post-operatively, but there was only a modest improvement in general health; the mean SF-36 improved from 44.8 (19 to 66) to 50.1 (21 to 76). There was a major benefit in terms of pain relief.

Arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is an effective treatment for complex ankle pathology, with good clinical outcomes and eradication of infection. However, even after successful arthrodesis general health scores remain limited.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:371–7.

Complications encountered with circular ring fixation in persons with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify and report the complications associated with the use of circular ring fixation in diabetic patients, and to compare the frequency of complications in patients without diabetes. We hypothesized that complications with circular ring fixation occurred more frequently in patients with diabetes than patients without diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained and patient charts were retrospectively reviewed from June 2004 and February 2007. Fifty six consecutive patients undergoing midfoot, hindfoot and/or ankle surgery were treated with circular ring fixation which included 33 diabetic patients in the study group and 23 non-diabetic patients in the control group. Patient demographics, the duration of treatment with the external fixator, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Males had a greater number of complications compared to females (p = 0.0014). The total number of complications was statistically greater in diabetic patients (study group) versus non-diabetic patients (control group) (p = 0.003). In multivariate logistic regression, diabetes and male sex were the only significant variables associated with wire complications (OR 7.35, 95% CI 1.93-28.04 and OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-8584111, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Women are protected from wire complications with a risk reduction of 78% compared to males. Diabetics have a 7-fold risk for any wire complication compared to patients without diabetes. We found no adverse effects of BMI, obesity, age, smoking, neuropathy, or Charcot neuroarthropathy on a satisfactory recovery.

Distal tibial reconstruction with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail. Surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Distal tibial reconstruction with use of an external fixator when there is bone loss, limb-length discrepancy, and/or ankle instability is associated with many problems. The technique of limb-lengthening, ankle arthrodesis, and segmental transfer over an intramedullary nail has been introduced to overcome these problems. The present study investigates this combined technique.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2005, six patients, who ranged from seventeen to seventy years old, underwent distal tibial reconstruction and ankle arthrodesis with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail to treat a distal tibial defect following resection for chronic osteomyelitis or tumor or to treat a limb-length discrepancy combined with ankle instability. Functional and radiographic results were evaluated, with use of the criteria described by Paley et al., at an average follow-up of thirty-four months.

RESULTS

The mean size of the bone defect in three patients was 5.3 cm (2, 7, and 7 cm), and the mean amount of the limb-shortening in four patients was 5.25 cm (range, 4 to 6 cm). The mean external fixation time was 3.5 months, and the mean external fixator index was 0.57 mo/cm. There was no recurrence of infection in the two patients with osteomyelitis. All six patients had excellent bone results, and the functional results were excellent for two patients and good for four patients. There were four complications, three of which were categorized, according to Paley, as a problem (a difficulty that occurs during lengthening and is resolved without operative intervention) and one that was categorized as an obstacle (a difficulty that occurs during lengthening and needs operative treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined technique is an improvement over the classic external fixation techniques of distal tibial reconstruction with ankle arthrodesis. It reduces the duration of external fixation, thus increasing patient acceptance, and it is associated with a low complication rate facilitating more rapid rehabilitation.

A biomechanical comparison of micromotion after ankle fusion using 2 fixation techniques: intramedullary arthrodesis nail or Ilizarov external fixator

BACKGROUND

In difficult ankle arthrodesis situations, intramedullary (IM) arthrodesis nails and external fixation are often considered in lieu of standard fusion techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of micromotion measured across an ankle fusion site stabilized with either an IM nail or with the Ilizarov external fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The relative bone mineral density of 8 pairs of human cadaveric lower legs was measured by DEXA scanning. One specimen from each pair was randomly assigned to be stabilized with a new generation IM nail and the other with an Ilizarov external fixator. Specimens were tested in compression, rotation, and dorsiflexion. Optical motion capture was used to measure the direct motion occurring at the fusion site.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the axial displacements (p = 0.94), torsional displacement (p = 0.07), or the dorsiflexion angular displacement (p = 0.28) for the IM rod group and the external fixation group. A weak correlation was found between BMD and displacement.

CONCLUSION

Both the new generation IM nail and the Ilizarov external fixator imparted excellent stability to the fusion site despite a wide range of bone mineral densities. Medialization of the talus, the ability to compress the nail, and the addition of a posterior-to-anterior locking screw were thought to improve the performance of the nail.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both IM nail and Ilizarov external fixation provided excellent fusion site stability. The decision of which implant to use for complex arthrodesis should be dictated by the clinical needs.

Minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde locking nail after failed fusion

A retrograde nail with posterior-to-anterior (PA) locking into os calcis, talus and tibia was used to correct deformity and achieve fusion after failed fusion. A variety of methods have been published to achieve union of the ankle and subtalar joint in a failed fusion situation. We have studied a retrograde locking nail technique through a 2.5-cm incision in the non-weightbearing part of the sole of the foot. Remaining cartilage in the ankle joint, where necessary, was percutaneously removed through an anterior approach and the locking nail was inserted after reaming of os calcis, talus and tibia. Locking screw insertion was in the sagittal plane (p.a. direction), in talus os calcis and tibial diaphysis using a nail mounted jig. Ten patients were entered in the study (age 27-60 years). The initial aetiology for attempted fusion was post-traumatic in nine cases and rheumatic in one case. There were 25 previous operations in the cohort not leading to fusion. An additional temporary external fixator was used in four cases to reach and maintain the optimum position for the procedure. The intervention time was 30-75 min. Dynamisation of the nail was performed after four months under local anaesthesia. The mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (3-5.5 years). Radiologically and clinically, fusion was achieved in 16 weeks (range, 12-20 weeks). There was no loosening of the implant or implant failure. A leg length discrepancy was avoided using this technique. There was one complication with varus malunion in a heavy smoker which united after corrective osteotomy, revision nailing and bone grafting. Patient satisfaction was measured on a scale (not visual analogue) of 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied); overall satisfaction averaged 9.5 points (range, 6-10 points). The postoperative ankle-hindfoot score of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society averaged 73.5 points (range, 61-81 points). Retrograde locked nailing with locking in the sagittal plane is a reliable minimally invasive procedure to achieve fusion of the ankle and the subtalar joint after failed fusion.

The use of circular wire external fixation in the treatment of salvage ankle arthrodesis

The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with circular wire external fixation in the treatment of salvage ankle arthrodesis during the past 9 years. The results of 43 cases in a difficult patient population are presented with an average follow-up of 27.0 months. Thirty-three patients (80.5%) went on to achieve a solid fusion or stable pseudarthrosis. A minimum of a 4-ring frame construct was applied for an average of 96.1 days. The major complication rate was 51.2%, including 3 below-knee amputations (7.3%), 7 unstable nonunions (17.1%), 7 cases of osteomyelitis and/or deep-space infection (16.3%), 3 malunions (7.3%), and 2 tibial stress fractures (4.7%). The incidence of complications occurred similarly in patients with Charcot arthropathy, failed total ankle arthroplasty, septic fusion, posttraumatic deformity, or avascular necrosis of the talus, whereas it was relatively higher in patients who were diabetics, smokers, or had an increased body mass index. In addition, the incidence of a nonunion tended to increase with longer follow-up, suggesting that early presumption of a solid union may be erroneous. Based on our defined criteria of a stable, well-aligned fusion without severe pain or activity restrictions, 28 patients (68.3%) had a good result. Circular wire external fixation can be a viable treatment for complex ankle salvage pathology; however, it is difficult to predict the prospects of success or failure.

External fixation use in arthrodesis of the foot and ankle

The use of external fixation in foot and ankle arthrodesis can be beneficial. Its advantages, disadvantages, and indications were reviewed in this article. External fixation offers the surgeon an opportunity to treat complex foot and ankle deformities, trauma, chronic infections, pseudoarthroses, soft tissue contractures, and limb length discrepancies in ways that were unavailable before its advent. The Ilizarov technique requires considerable experience and patient compliance for the best postoperative outcome. An understanding of musculoskeletal physiology and the biomechanics of bone and soft tissue are essential for the competent application of external fixators in general and Ilizarov frames in particular. The surgeon should be aware of all the surgical options before the application of an external complex apparatus.

Fusion of the Septic Ankle: Experience with 15 Cases Using Hybrid External Fixation

BACKGROUND

In cases of septic joint destruction, an unfavorable situation of soft tissues and chronic osteomyelitis are responsible for high failure rates of ankle fusions. We wanted to evaluate the control of infection and the fusion rate using hybrid external fixators for the fusion of the septic ankle in a prospective study.

METHODS

From 1996 to 1998, 15 arthrodeses were performed using hybrid external fixators. All patients had a combination of bone and soft tissue infections. Fourteen patients suffered from sequelae of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and one patient suffered from rheumatoid arthritis. In 14 patients, pathogens could be identified; in 87%, Staphylococcus aureus was found. Eight patients had relevant concomitant diseases.

RESULTS

The preservation of limbs by solid tibiotalar fusion was achieved in 14 patients (93%). One patient maintained an infected pseudarthrosis. During the 12-month follow-up, three patients had a fistula that persisted, with two patients having a solid arthrodesis. Full weight-bearing was possible for all the patients with a successful fusion. Seventy-five percent of the patients that had not retired at the time of the study regained their fitness for work.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid external fixator presents a successful alternative for those arthrodeses of ankle joints where complications such as bone/joint infections or poor soft tissue conditions occur.