Unreamed femoral nail with spiral blade in subtrochanteric fractures: experience of 55 cases

Surgical Management of Metastatic Pathologic Subtrochanteric Fractures: Treatment Modalities and Associated Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Subtrochanteric pathological fractures (PFs) occur in approximately one-third of femur bone metastases. We seek to analyze surgical treatment strategies for subtrochanteric metastatic PFs and their revision rates.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed and Ovid databases. Reoperations as a result of complications were analyzed according to initial treatment modality, primary tumor site, and type of revision procedure.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 544 patients, 405 with PFs and 139 with impending fractures. The study population's mean age was 65.85 years with a male/female ratio of 0.9. Patients with subtrochanteric PFs who underwent an intramedullary nail (IMN) procedure (75%) presented a noninfectious revision rate of 7.2%. Patients treated with prosthesis reconstruction (21%) presented a noninfectious revision rate of 8.9% for standard endoprostheses and 2.5% for tumoral endoprostheses (p < 0.001). Revision rates because of infection were 2.2% for standard and 7.5% for tumoral endoprostheses. There were no infections within the IMN and plate/screws group (p = 0.407). Breast was the most common primary tumor site (41%) and had the highest revision rate (14.81%). Prosthetic reconstructions were the most common type of revision procedure.

CONCLUSION

No consensus exists regarding the optimal surgical approach in patients with subtrochanteric PFs. IMN is a simpler, less invasive procedure, ideal for patients with a shorter survival. Tumoral prostheses may be better suited for patients with longer life expectancies. Treatment should be tailored considering revision rates, patient's life expectancy, and surgeon's expertise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dynamic hip screw fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

Introduction

A subtrochanteric proximal femur fracture occurs in the 5 cm of bone immediately distal to the lesser trochanter. UK national guidelines advise that adults with subtrochanteric fractures should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN). This study aims to compare peri-operative outcome measures of patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with either an IMN or a dynamic hip screw (DHS) construct.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed subtrochanteric fractures presenting at our institution over 4.5 years (October 2014–May 2019), classifying them into two treatment groups; IMN and DHS. These groups were compared on outcome measures including surgical time, blood loss, radiation dose area product (DAP), length of stay, re-operation rate and mortality.

Results

During the time period studied, 86 patients presented with a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur; with 74 patients (86%) receiving an IMN and 12 (14%) receiving a DHS. The comparative outcome measures reaching statistical significance were blood loss and radiation DAP. The DHS group showed a significantly lower mean blood loss of 776 ml compared to 1029 ml in the IMN group. Also, the DHS group showed a significantly lower mean DAP of 150.30 mGy cm² compared to 288.86 mGy cm² in the IMN group.

Conclusion

Although UK national guidelines recommend treating all subtrochanteric fractures with an IMN; the outcome measures assessed in our study did not show use of an IMN to be superior to a DHS. The DHS group showed a lower estimated blood loss and a reduced DAP. This, along with the reduced financial cost associated with a DHS, may support the use of DHS over IMN for certain subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. There may not be a single favourable implant for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures as a whole; instead different subtypes of fracture may be amenable to a number of fixation devices. Choice of implant should be determined locally and based on existing and future clinical and health economic research.

Outcome after fixation of metastatic proximal femoral fractures: A systematic review of 40 studies

Endoprosthetic reconstruction, intramedullary nailing, and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) are the most commonly practiced surgical strategies for treatment of metastatic proximal femoral fractures. This review describes functional outcome, local, and systemic complications. All three surgical strategies result in reasonable function on average; however, wide ranges indicate that both poor and good functional levels are obtained. We found that the overall reoperation rate was comparable for endoprosthesis and intramedullary nailing, but was higher for ORIF. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:507-519. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using Selfdynamisable internal fixator

Background

Surgical treatment is the preferred method for treating subtrochanteric femoral fractures and the variety of extramedullary and intramedullary implants continues to evolve. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological results of subtrochanteric fractures that are treated with the Selfdynamisable internal fixator.

Methods

From January 2000 to January 2004, we treated 49 consecutive patients who had subtrochanteric fractures. According to the AO classification, 8 (16.3%) fractures were type 32-A, 16 (32.7%) were type 32-B and 25 (51%) fractures were type 32-C. The mean follow-up time was 22.3 months.

Results

The average operating time was 45 minutes (range, 32 to 90 minutes). The average blood loss was 250 mL (range, 125 to 350 mL). The average hospital stay was 10 days (range, 7 to 59 days). Implant failure was not observed and union was achieved in all the patients. Deep infection occurred in one (2%) patient in the early postoperative period. Fracture union was achieved at a mean of 14 weeks. Varus malalignment less then 10 degree was noted in three (6.1%) patients at the end of follow-up. Thirty-five patients were pain-free and 14 had mild pain.

Conclusions

The selfdynamisable internal fixator was successfully used for subtrochanteric fracture. It provides a short operative time, low blood loss, spontaneous biaxial dynamisation and healing in an optimal period of time without the need for secondary intervention.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femur fractures with a locking plate: a prospective series of 20 fractures

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing is a mainstay in the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. But nailing is often unsuitable for difficult fracture patterns with comminution or when the medullary canal is narrow. The purpose of this study was to clarify the efficacy of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with locking compression plate in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

Twenty patients with subtrochanteric fractures (mean age 49.6 years) were prospectively treated using the MIPO technique using a locking plate. Indications of procedure were fractures with the greater trochanter or medial comminution, and multiple injured patients with a narrow femoral canal. According to the AO/OTA classification, there were three of type A, eight of type B, and nine of type C.

RESULTS

All healed without bone graft, at an average of 20.1 weeks (range 16-32). With the exception of two patients with minor internal rotation deformity and one patient with 1 cm of shortening, most achieved acceptable alignment. All patients were able to walk with no or only a slight limp, and median Merle d'Aubigne score was 17.3 (15-18). Four patients complained of a slight pain in the trochanteric area due to plate prominence. The MIPO technique with a locking plate provides an alternative method for fixing subtrochanteric femur fractures, when IM nailing is inappropriate. This technique provides stable fixation, with a high union rate and a minimal complication rate.

Subtrochanteric fractures: current management options

PURPOSE

To review current management options for subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. These fractures behave differently from other proximal femoral fractures and have their own management pitfalls and problems.

METHOD

Articles were identified from Medline. Papers on the management of subtrochanteric fractures were assessed, and included if they contained relevant information. The articles were divided into groups depending on the type of management described. Conservative and operative management were considered separately. Operative management was classified according to the type of device used into extramedullary and intramedullary.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management gives satisfactory results in 56% of patients compared to 70 - 80% for operative methods. The studies on conservative methods are mostly dated, with less stringent outcome measures. Conservative management is safe, and has a low frequency of non-union. It is most applicable in regions where facilities are suboptimal, in patients unfit for surgery, and in children. When considering operative management, intramedullary devices appear to give better results than extramedullary devices, particularly when the medial buttress of the proximal femur is compromised. However, when operative treatment is undertaken, it should be by experienced surgeons using the technique with which they are most familiar.