Ionising radiation during internal fixation of extracapsular neck of femur fractures

Factors associated with increased radiation exposure in the fixation of proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

When using radiation intraoperatively, a surgeon should aim to keep the radiation dose as low as is reasonably achievable to obtain the therapeutic goal. We aimed to investigate factors associated with increased radiation exposure in fixation of proximal femur fractures.

METHODS

We assessed 369 neck of femur fractures over a 1-year period in a district general hospital. All hip fracture subtypes that had undergone surgical fixation were included. We assessed the relationship between type of fracture, implants used and surgeon level of experience with the dose-area product (DAP; cGy/cm2) and screening time (dS). We also looked at the quality of reduction and fixation and its effect on the radiation exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included in our analysis; 185 patients who were treated with hip arthroplasty were excluded. There was a significant association between higher DAP and fracture subtype (p = 0.001), fracture complexity (p < 0.001), if an additional implant was used (p = 0.001), if fixation was satisfactory (p = 0.002) and operative time (p < 0.001). DAP was higher with a proximal femoral nail than with a dynamic hip screw, especially when a long nail was used. There was some evidence of an association between the surgeon's level of experience and DAP exposure, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased radiation in proximal femur fractures is seen in the fixation of complex fractures, some subtypes, with certain types of implants used and if an additional implant was required. Surgeon seniority did not result in less radiation exposure, which is in contrast to other published studies.

Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Introduction

Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not well defined. Despite protective measures, evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. The purpose of this study was to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents and to determine the variability of exposure among post graduate year (PGY) of residency.

Methods

Monthly radiation exposure was measured prospectively over a 12-month period in orthopaedic surgery residents from a single program. Participants wore dosimeters above ("exposed") and beneath ("shielded") protective lead. The primary outcome measure was the absolute value of radiation exposure in mSv. Repeated measures analysis was used to assess exposure with age, sex, year of training, operating room (OR) days, and height.

Results

Mean annual occupational radiation exposure was 3.30 ± 0.64 mSv over an average of 107 ± 38 OR days. Mean exposure per OR day was 0.033 ± 0.008 mSv. PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents had the highest cumulative exposure, and PGY-5 residents had the highest mean exposure per OR day (0.044 ± 0.009 mSv/d). Number of OR days per month and PGY level were significant predictors of radiation exposure (p < 0.05). Sex, age, and height were not significant in predicting radiation of the exposed dosimeter.

Conclusions

Orthopaedic residents' exposure to radiation is nearly twice the general population's exposure. Given that yearly radiation exposure was highest during early residency years, but exposure based on number of OR days was highest in the final year of training, it is essential for resident education regarding radiation safety and safe clinical practices throughout their training.

Femoral Neck Fractures Treated by Closed Reduction and Internal Fixation with the Double Fluoroscope Technique: A Preliminary Study

Background: Fractures of the femur require significant radiation exposure during operations using fluoroscopy (C-arm), posing a high risk of radiation exposure to the medical staff and patients. To address this concern, in this study, we investigated the efficacy of using two fluoroscopy machines simultaneously. Methods: We categorized 30 patients with femoral neck fracture (FNF) into single and double C-arm groups. The operation and radiation exposure times during a closed reduction and internal fixation operation were investigated to evaluate whether the operation and radiation exposure times were effectively audited when the operation was performed using a double C-arm. Results: The total operation times were 93.21 ± 20.70 min and 66.69 ± 13.97 min for the single and double C-arm groups, respectively. Additionally, the total radiation times were 100.43 ± 24.59 s and 83.06 ± 19.53 s for the single and double C-arm groups, respectively. Operation and radiation exposure times in the two groups showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of double C-arm in FNF can reduce operation and radiation exposure times. Hence, using the double C-arm in surgical treatment could reduce the risk of radiation exposure to medical staff and patients.

Does computer-assisted orthopaedics system (ADAPT system) improve outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures?

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a general treatment for intertrochanteric hip fractures. The computer-assisted orthopaedics system (CAOS), ADAPT system (Stryker, NJ), has been developed to facilitate lag screw insertion. When compared to the conventional freehand method, the efficacy of CAOS has not been clearly clarified. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to answer: does the CAOS performed better than freehand method in IMN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies published up to January 2023 were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases with predetermined key words. Comparative clinical studies between CAOS (ADAPT system) and freehand method were included. The primary outcomes of interest were the tip-apex-distance (TAD) and positions of lag screw. Fluoroscopy use, operation duration and intraoperative/postoperative complications were also extracted. A meta-analysis was performed for pooled analysis.

RESULTS

There were seven studies with 326 fractures in CAOS group and 325 fractures in Freehand group. All studies included presented high qualities. The CAOS group showed a statistically smaller TAD than Freehand group (weighted mean difference = -3.24 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.10 to -1.37 mm; p = 0.0007) and a better lag screw position (83/92 [90.2%] VS 64/92 [69.6%]; RR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.51; p = 0.0007). The operative time and radiation use revealed no difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence indicated that ADAPT system could help to perform a more accurate lag screw than freehand manipulation while the operative time and radiation time was not reduced as expectations on such new technique. Long-term follow-up studies are appealed.

Radiation in orthopaedics (RIO) study: a national survey of UK orthopaedic surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Orthopaedic surgeons have a responsibility to minimise risks of ionising radiation to patients, themselves and staff. This study aims to establish the understanding of radiation practice, legislation and risk by orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

A nationwide online survey of UK-based orthopaedic surgeons was conducted. Participants answered 18 multiple-choice questions assessing level of radiation safety training, basic principles/knowledge of ionising radiation, relevant legislation and operating practice.

RESULTS

A total of 406 surgeons completed the survey. 92% reported using intraoperative ionising radiation at least once per week. 38% received no formal training on radiation safety. Knowledge of basic principles of radiation and legislation was limited. There was variable knowledge when labelling an image intensifier machine and choosing its safest orientation. Poor uptake of radiation protection equipment was noted. Only 19% agreed they had adequate training in ionising radiation safety and 27% reported receiving adequate training in equipment emitting ionising radiation in the operating theatre.

CONCLUSION

Many orthopaedic surgeons in the UK do not believe they are adequately trained in radiation safety. There is a deficiency amongst practicing surgeons in basic knowledge, relevant legislation and practicalities of the use of ionising radiation in the operating room. This could potentially put patients and health-care professionals at additional risk. We recommend that a standardised national training programme on the basic principles and safety of ionising radiation is implemented for all practicing orthopaedic surgeons.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This paper is the first UK national survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons and is one of the largest reported internationally.

The use of ionising radiation in orthopaedic surgery: principles, regulations and managing risk to surgeons and patients

The use of ionising radiation for plain film radiography and computerised tomography is fundamental in both diagnostics and treatment for orthopaedics. However, radiation is not without risk as high exposure can increase the risk of cancer. Little time is spent educating doctors about the relative risks of radiation, both to patients and themselves. In addition, there are common misunderstandings about the best ways to mitigate such risk. We aim to provide an overview of the fundamental principles of the use of ionising radiation and its risks within the context of orthopaedic surgery. While providing a narrative review of the current literature, we discuss the basic physics, standards of good practice and relevant UK and European regulations. We discuss the risks to patients and surgeons and suggest ways that these can be mitigated in the operating theatre. A thorough understanding of the risks, and appropriate procedural rules, with respect to the use of ionising radiation is essential for those in orthopaedic practice.

Radiation Exposure of Anaesthetists Visualised by Real-time Dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry.

METHODS

Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time.

RESULTS

A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head.

CONCLUSION

By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.

Training and Transfer Effect of FluoroSim, an Augmented Reality Fluoroscopic Simulator for Dynamic Hip Screw Guidewire Insertion: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

FluoroSim, a novel fluoroscopic simulator, can be used to practice dynamic hip screw (DHS) guidewire insertion in a high-fidelity clinical scenario. Our aim was to demonstrate a training effect in undergraduate medical students who are not familiar with this operation and its simulation.

METHODS

Forty-five undergraduate medical students were recruited and randomized to either training (n = 23) or control (n = 22) cohorts. The training cohort had more exposure to FluoroSim (5 attempts each week) over a 2-week period (with a 1-week washout period in between) compared with the control cohort (a single attempt 1 week apart) over a 2-week period. Five real-time objective performance metrics were recorded: (1) tip-apex distance (TAD) (mm), (2) predicted cut-out rate (%), (3) total procedural time (sec), (4) total number of radiographs (n), and (5) total number of guidewire retries (n).

RESULTS

At baseline, there was no significant difference in the performance metrics, which confirmed the absence of a selection bias. The intragroup training effect demonstrated a significant improvement in all metrics for the training cohort only. A significant difference between groups was demonstrated as the training cohort significantly outperformed the control cohort in 3 metrics (procedural time [25%], number of radiographs [57%], and number of guidewire retries [100%]; p < 0.001). A learning curve showed an inversely proportional correlation between frequency of attempts and procedural time as well as the number of digital fluoroscopic radiographs that were made, indicating the development of psychomotor skills. There was also an improved baseline of the learning curve after the 1-week washout period, suggesting skill retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Skill acquisition with the FluoroSim system was demonstrated with repeat exposure in a safe, radiation-free high-fidelity clinical simulation with actual operating room equipment. The task of DHS guidewire insertion requires cognitive and psychomotor skills that take a variable number of attempts to acquire, as demonstrated on the learning curve. Additional work is required to demonstrate that the skill tested by the FluoroSim is the same skill that is required for intraoperative DHS guidewire insertion. However, use of the FluoroSim provides improvement in skills with extra-clinical training opportunities for orthopaedic trainees.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FluoroSim has demonstrated validity and training effect. It has the potential to be approved for possible use on patients in the operating room to help surgeons with the operation. Consequently, operating time, accuracy of TAD, and surgical outcomes may all be improved.

Improving patient and staff safety by minimising radiation exposure during trauma surgery: A simple and validated predictive model

INTRODUCTION

Minimising radiation exposure, from fluoroscopic equipment during trauma surgery is crucial to safe-guarding patients and staff. This aim of this study was to identify variables associated with increased radiation exposure for 3 of the most common trauma procedures. Secondly, we aimed to derive an internally and externally validated mathematical model for predicting radiation exposure for these procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively recorded radiation exposure from 270 sliding hip screw (SHS), ankle and wrist fixation procedures. Patient demographics, fracture severity, surgeon and radiographer grade were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. A mathematical model was then created and externally assessed for validity from another unit.

RESULTS

With regards to the analysis of radiation exposure when fixing wrist fractures, a significant regression equation was found (F (3, 86) = 62.2, p < 0.001), with an adjusted R² of 0.69. Patients' predicted radiation exposure (cGY/cm2) was therefore equal to the positive result of: 81.916(Fracture severity) + 43.426(Surgical grade) + 23.490 (radiographer grade)-203.89.With regards to the analysis of radiation exposure when fixing ankle fractures, a significant regression equation was found, (F (3, 83) = 15.49, p < 0.001), with an adjusted R² of 0.34. Patients' predicted radiation exposure (cGY/cm2) was therefore equal to the positive result of: 39.541(Fracture severity) + 51.937(Surgical grade) + 37.702 (radiographer grade)-124.558 SHS (F (3, 89) = 25.29, p < 0.001), R² of 0.44.61.338(Fracture severity) + 60.945(Surgical grade) + 35.491 (radiographer grade)-105.501. These predictive models were successfully externally validated.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated a workable and externally validated model for accurately predicting the likely radiation exposure using common and easily collectable variables. These models could be used to modify practuce and minimise the radiation exposure to patients and staff.

Does surgeon experience influence the amount of radiation exposure during orthopedic procedures? A systematic review

With an increasing use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in operating rooms worldwide, the topic of radiation exposure has become a major concern among hospital staff, doctors and patients alike. Since fluoroscopy has become an integral part in orthopedic intraoperative management, we sought to identify whether surgeon grade or experience plays a role in the amount of radiation used and consequently exposed. We performed a systematic review examining the association between surgeon experience and radiation exposure using primary outcome measures (radiation dose and total screening time/fluoroscopy time). To be included in the review, the study population had to compare varying surgeon experience levels and their effect on the primary outcomes. A total of eighteen studies were included in the review. The studies were a mix of prospective and retrospective studies with low to moderate quality as evaluated by the MINORs criteria. Studies were variable in defining surgeon experience levels and in the type of operations being performed. Majority of the studies showed that inexperienced surgeons/trainees had a higher total fluoroscopy time and a higher mean radiation exposure as compared to experienced surgeons. We conclude that higher surgeon experience significantly reduces usage of fluoroscopy and the consequent radiation exposure in orthopedic procedures. Introduction of strict radiation guidelines involving limited usage of fluoroscopy and supervision of trainees may be beneficial in controlling radiation exposure in the future.

Radiation risk amongst orthopaedic surgeons - Do we know the risk?

Radiation risk amongst orthopaedic surgeons and theatre personnel is increasing with increased use of fluoroscopy imaging. Increased radiation risk has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of malignancies, ocular and thyroid disorders. Very high exposures have been reported in spinal surgery and during intra-medullary nailing. With an increase in modern and percutaneous methods, the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy has increased as well. The aim of this article was to review the available evidence of radiation risk amongst healthcare personnel. A systematic search was carried out in PubMED, CINAHL and Cochrane on intra-operative radiation in trauma and orthopaedic operating room. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies and systematic reviews reporting on radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time and references to specific safety guidelines. This article highlights the safety aspects of radiation protection and harmful effects of radiation during orthopaedic procedures. The responsibility to minimise radiation exposure in operating theatre lies with the team within the operating room.

The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives

To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Design

Single-center, randomized, prospective study.

Setting

Academic Level I trauma hospital.

Patients and Intervention

34 patients treated with cephalomedullary nailing for a stable, intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture (OTA A1).

Main Outcome Measurement

The total working time of the fluoroscopy device, the dose-area product (DAP), operating time, reduction quality (cortical continuity, symmetrical collodiaphyseal angle, and shortness), and fixation quality (Bosworth quadrants, the tip-apex distance, TAD).

Results

There were no cases of poor reduction; also the placement of the blade was optimal for 14 patients and suboptimal in 3 patients in each group. Superior-posterior placement of the blade or TAD > 25 mm was not seen in any patient. Total operating time was significantly shorter when using device A compared to the use of device B (20.1 ± 3.4 mins versus 25.3 ± 5.4 mins, p < 0.001). Total radiation time was significantly shorter with device A compared to the use of device B (58.1 ± 19.4 secs versus 98.9  ±  55.4 secs, p = 0.008). The measured radiation dose was lower with the use of device A compared to device B (3.5  ±  1.2 Gy·cm² versus 7.3  ±  4.5 Gy·cm², p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Physical properties of fluoroscopy devices used during the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures could yield significant differences in operating times and the radiation dose while having comparable clinical results.

Pulsation and Collimation During Fluoroscopy to Decrease Radiation: A Cadaver Study

Background

Awareness of the harmful effects of long-term low-dose radiation is rising. Many studies have assessed both patient and physician exposure to radiation in association with the use of fluoroscopy in the operating room. However, to our knowledge, previous studies have not assessed, in a detailed fashion, the reduction in radiation exposure that pulsation and collimation provide.

Methods

Seven fresh cadavers were irradiated for 5 minutes with C-arm fluoroscopy with use of standard x-ray and pulsed and collimated x-ray beams. The x-ray sources were placed under the table, over the table, and lateral to the table. Radiation exposure doses were measured at different points, such as the center of the radiation field on the cadaver as well as at the locations of the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation (a physics equation to predict exposure) was performed to estimate the dose reduction and to confirm the experimental results.

Results

The radiation exposure doses associated with the use of pulsed fluoroscopy (8 times per second) were reduced by approximately 30% for the patient and by approximately 70% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of continuous fluoroscopy. The radiation exposure doses associated with the use of collimated beams were reduced to approximately 65% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of non-collimated fluoroscopy. These results were consistent with the simulation, and the phenomena could be appropriately explained by physics.

Conclusions

The present study revealed the effectiveness of pulsed and collimated x-ray beams in reducing radiation exposure doses resulting from C-arm fluoroscopy. Surgeons should consider using the techniques of pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation to protect patients and themselves from radiation.

Clinical Relevance

This study presents data regarding the reduction of radiation exposure provided by pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation.

The effect of surgical experience on the amount of radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during dynamic hip screw fixation

INTRODUCTION Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for proximal femur fractures is one of the most common procedures in trauma that requires the use of fluoroscopy. Emphasis is often placed on producing the 'perfect picture', which may lead to excessive use of fluoroscopy, without added patient benefit. This study, the largest of its kind, aimed to determine the effect of surgical experience on the amount of radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during DHS fixation. METHODS All hospital admissions for extracapsular proximal femur fractures to our institution between 2007 and 2012 were analysed. Patient demographics, fracture configuration, grade of surgeon and the total radiation dose after fixation were recorded. Analysis of variance was performed to assess differences in radiation levels between different grades of surgeon. RESULTS A total of 1,203 patients with a mean age of 81.3 years (range: 21-105 years) were included in the study. The majority of the fractures were three-part (33.3%), followed by two-part (32.2%), four-part (25.7%) and basicervical (8.9%). Registrars (ST3-ST8) used a significantly higher radiation dose than consultants for all fracture types (p=0.009). When analysed separately by trainee group, the most junior registrars (ST3-ST4) and the most senior registrars (ST7-ST8) were found to use significantly higher radiation levels than consultants (p=0.037 and p<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS The level of surgical experience does influence the amount of radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during DHS fixation. Surgical trainees should not ignore the potential harmful effects of radiation and should be equipped with the knowledge of how to keep the radiation exposure as low as possible.

Radiation exposure in spine surgery using an image-guided system based on intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography: analysis of 107 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

The O-arm system in spine surgery allows greater accuracy, lower rate of screw misplacement, and reduced surgical time. Some concerns have been postulated regarding the radiation doses to patients and surgeons. To the best of the authors' knowledge, most of the studies in the literature were performed with the use of phantoms. The authors present data regarding radiation exposure of the surgeon and operating room (OR) staff in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

Radiation exposure data were collected in a series of 107 patients who underwent spine surgery using the O-arm system. The doses received by the surgeon and the staff were collected using electronic dosimeters.

RESULTS

All patients underwent 1–3 scans. The mean radiation dose to the patients was 5.15 mSv (range 1.48–7.64 mSv). The mean dose registered for the scan operator was 0.005 μSv (range 0.00–0.03 μSv) while the other members of the surgical team positioned outside the OR received 0 μSv.

CONCLUSIONS

The O-arm system exposes patients to a higher radiation dose than standard fluoroscopy. However, considering the clear advantages of this system, this adjunctive dose can be considered acceptable. Moreover, the effective dose to the patient can be reduced using collimation or minimizing the parameters of the O-arm system used in this paper. The exposure to operators is essentially negligible when radioprotective garments and protocols are adopted as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure in Spinal Surgery: In Vivo Evaluation for Operating Room Personnel

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective in vivo investigation of fluoroscopic radiation exposure during spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the total amount of radiation dosage and identify techniques to maintain safe levels of fluoroscopic exposure in the operating room.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No previous study has performed an in vivo examination of fluoroscopic radiation exposure to the spinal surgeon and operating room personnel. Previous similar studies were in vitro, used older versions of fluoroscopy, and increased fluoro times associated with pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Thirty-five surgeries were evaluated in 18 males and 17 females (mean age 52.4 y; range, 26.0-79.4). Surgeries included 37 lumbar levels fused, 45 lumbar decompressions, 8 anterior cervical fusions, and 19 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spinal instrumentation was implemented in all fusion procedures (104 lumbar pedicle screws, 14 iliac, 22 anterior cervical). Radiation dosimetry was obtained through unprotected badges placed on surgeon's chest, first assistant chest, cranial and caudal end of operating table.

RESULTS

Total fluoroscopic time was 37.01 minutes. Mean fluoroscopic time with lumbar spine instrumentation was greater than decompression alone (1.74 vs. 0.22 min). Total fluoroscopic radiation exposure was obtained for surgeon (1225 mrem), first assistant (369 mrem), cranial table (92 mrem), and caudal table (150 mrem). Mean dose/min (mrem/min) was calculated for surgeon (33.1), first assistant (9.97), cranial table (2.48), and caudal table (4.05). To remain below the maximum yearly permissible level of radiation, the estimated total number of minutes for the surgeon would be 453.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this in vivo study indicate fluoroscopic dosage to the spine surgeon remains below the annual maximum limit of radiation exposure. Increasing distance from radiation source led to a significantly diminished in vivo dosimetry reading. Monitoring fluoroscopic time and maintaining a distance from the beam source, radiation exposure to the spine surgeon may be kept within current safety standards.

Prospective Assessment of the Oncogenic Risk to Patients From Fluoroscopy During Trauma Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Concern about radiation exposure during surgery has focused on surgeon exposure. However, the patient receives exposure that is more direct and, in surgery about the pelvis and hip, internal pelvic nonskeletal organs often cannot be shielded without obscuring the region of surgical interest. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate patients' radiation exposure during fracture surgery of the acetabulum, pelvic ring, and femur to calculate future cancer incidence (CI).

DESIGN

Prospective descriptive cohort.

SETTING

Level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eight patients with acetabulum, pelvic, or femur fractures requiring operative repair were prospectively enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Dosimeters were placed in locations determined for each surgery type by a medical physicist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographics, operative records, and average x-ray emission energy were recorded. Effective dose, specific organ doses, and lifetime CI for a 30-year-old patient were calculated.

RESULTS

Diagnoses included 27 acetabular fractures, 30 intertrochanteric femur fractures, 26 femoral shafts, and 25 pelvic ring injuries. Patients with pelvic ring injuries received the highest effective dose at 0.91 ± 0.74 mSv. The average lifetime increase in CI, for any cancer type, after pelvic ring fixation is 0.0097% for females and 0.0062% for males. The greatest mean single-organ dose to the ovaries (3.82 ± 3.34 mGy) occurred during pelvic ring surgery, correlating to an increased ovarian cancer risk of 0.0013%. The greatest mean single-organ dose to the prostate (6.81 ± 5.91 mSv) also occurred during pelvic surgery, correlating to increased prostate cancer risk of 0.0024%.

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture surgery to the pelvis and femur is exceptionally fluoroscopy-dependent; however, the radiation exposure incurred represents a relatively small increased risk of future cancer development in patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient radiation doses in various fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic procedures

All orthopaedic fluoroscopic procedures performed using C-arm guidance were monitored for 1 y. The type of procedure, fluoroscopy time (T), kerma-area product (KAP) values and number of radiographs (F) were recorded. The two most often performed techniques were as follows: intramedullary nailing (IMN) of intertrochanteric/peritrochanteric (IP) fractures (101 cases, 49.3 %) and antergrade IMN of femur or tibia shaft (TS) fractures (28 cases, 13.7 %). For the remaining procedures, none accounted for >5 %, categorised as 'various' (76 cases, 37 %). Large variations in T, KAP and F were observed. For IMN of IP fractures, antergrade IMN of femur and TS fractures and for various procedures, respectively, median values were T--2.1, 2.2 and 0.6 min, KAP--6.3, 6.3 and 0.6 Gy cm(-2) and F--21, 2.2 and 6.7. The patient doses during fluoroscopically guided procedures are relatively low compared with other interventional procedures.

Peri-operative radiation exposure: Are overweight patients at increased risks?

The aim of this study was to identify if there was a correlation between body mass index (BMI) and intra-operative radiation exposure. A retrospective review of 81 patients who had sliding hip screw fixation for femoral neck fractures in one year was completed, recording body mass index (BMI), screening time, dose area product (DAP), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, seniority of operating surgeon and complexity of the fracture configuration. There was a statistically significant correlation between dose area product and BMI. There was no statistically significant relationship between screening time and BMI. There was no statistical difference between ASA grade, seniority of surgeon, or complexity of fracture configuration and dose area product. Simulated stochastic risks were increased for overweight patients. Overweight patients are exposed to increased doses of radiation regardless of length of screening time. Surgeons and theatre staff should be aware of the increased radiation exposure during fixation of fractures in overweight patients and, along with radiographers, ensure steps are taken to minimise these risks. Whilst such radiation dosages may have little adverse effect for individual patients, these findings may be of more relevance and concern to staff that will be exposed to increased radiation.

Evaluation of occupational and patient radiation doses in orthopedic surgery

This study intends to measure the radiation dose to patients and staff during (i) Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and (ii) Dynamic Cannula Screw (DCS) and to evaluate entrance surface Air kerma (ESAK) dose and organ doses and effective doses. Calibrated Thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD-GR200A) were used. The mean patients' doses were 0.46mGy and 0.07mGy for DHS and DCS procedures, respectively. The mean staff doses at the thyroid and chest were 4.69mGy and 1.21mGy per procedure. The mean organ and effective dose for patients and staff were higher in DHS compared to DCS. Orthopedic surgeons were exposed to unnecessary radiation doses due to the lack of protection measures. The radiation dose per hip procedure is within the safety limit and less than the previous studies.

Real-time dosimetry reduces radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Cancer prevalence of orthopaedic surgeons is elevated and chronic exposure to occupational ionizing radiation is seen as one reason.

HYPOTHESIS

Use of a new dosimeter enabling radiation dose monitoring in real-time may reduce radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of four months, the surgeon and the C-arm operator were equipped with a novel dosimeter called DoseAware(®) (DA) while using the C-arm fluoroscope intraoperatively. Data of 68 patients DA were retrospectively compared using matched-pair analysis with 68 controls without DA. Both groups were assessed regarding fluoroscopic time (FT) and radiation dose (RD). Seven types of operative procedures were performed: internal fixation of subcapital humerus fractures, midshaft clavicular fractures, distal radius fractures, pertrochanteric femoral fractures, ankle fractures, traumatic vertebral fractures and osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

Concerning the FT, use of DoseAware(®) led to a significant reduction for all evaluated operation types except for internal fixation of distal radius fractures (P=0.0511). Regarding the RD, use of DoseAware(®) led to a significant reduction for all evaluated operation types except trochanteric femoral fractures with a PFNA(®) (P=0.0841).

CONCLUSION

DoseAware(®) allowing real-time radiation dose monitoring reduces radiation exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon and instantly demonstrates the effects of dose-reduction techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective case control study.

The primary determinants of radiation use during fixation of proximal femur fractures

OBJECTIVES

To establish the primary determinants of operative radiation use during fixation of proximal femur fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level I trauma centre.

COHORT

205 patients treated surgically for subtrochanteric and intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fluoroscopy time, dose-area-product (DAP).

RESULTS

Longer fluoroscopy time was correlated with higher body mass index (p=0.04), subtrochanteric fracture (p<0.001), attending surgeon (p=0.001), and implant type (p<0.001). Increased DAP was associated with higher body mass index (p<0.001), subtrochanteric fracture (p=0.002), attending surgeon (p=0.003), lateral body position (p<0.001), and implant type (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The strongest determinants of radiation use during surgical fixation of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures were location of fracture, patient body position, patient body mass index, and the use of cephalomedullary devices. Surgeon style, presumably as it relates to teaching efforts, seems to strongly influence radiation use.

Virtual-reality simulation to assess performance in hip fracture surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Internal fixation of hip fractures is a common and important procedure that orthopedic surgeons must master early in their career. Virtual-reality training could improve initial skills, and a simulation-based test would make it possible to ensure basic competency of junior surgeons before they proceed to supervised practice on patients. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid test with credible pass/fail standards.

METHODS

20 physicians (10 untrained novices and 10 experienced orthopedic surgeons) each performed 3 internal fixation procedures of an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: 2 hook-pins, 2 screws, and a sliding hip screw. All procedures were preformed on a trauma simulator. Performance scores for each procedure were obtained from the predefined metrics of the simulator. The inter-case reliability of the simulator metrics was explored by calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient. Validity was explored by comparison between novices' and experts' scores using independent-samples t-test. A pass/fail standard was set by the contrasting-groups method and the consequences were explored.

RESULTS

The percentage of maximum combined score (PM score) showed an inter-case reliability of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93) between the 3 procedures. The mean PM score was 30% (CI: 7-53) for the novices and 76% (CI: 68-83) for the experienced surgeons. The pass/fail standard was set at 58%, resulting in none of the novices passing the test and a single experienced surgeon failing the test.

INTERPRETATION

The simulation-based test was reliable and valid in our setting, and the pass/fail standard could discriminate between novices and experienced surgeons. Potentially, training and testing of future junior surgeons on a virtual-reality simulator could ensure basic competency before proceeding to supervised practice on patients.

Closed reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric femoral fractures is safer and more efficient using two fluoroscopes simultaneously

The purpose of the study was to assess whether using two fluoroscopes simultaneously in closed reduction and internal fixation of a stable intertrochanteric fracture reduces radiation and operation time. Patients who sustained a stable intertrochanteric femoral fracture were operated in our institution with closed reduction and internal fixation. They were randomly allocated to be operated with the assistance of one or two fluoroscopes. With one device, the radiology technician controlled and moved it to the desired anterior-posterior or axial view. With two fluoroscopes, one was positioned in the anterior-posterior view and the other in the axial view, both controlled by the surgeon. Total radiation and operation time were collected for all patients and compared between the two groups. A total of 27 patients participated in the study. One fluoroscope was used for 13 surgeries and two in 14. Total radiation time was shorter with two fluoroscopes compared to the use of one (36.6±8.6s versus 51.2±18.9s, respectively; p<0.02), as was total operation time (24.3±4.2min and 34.7±11.9min, respectively; p<0.01). Working simultaneously with two fluoroscopic devices is safer for the medical team in the operating theatre, because it decreases the patient's radiation exposure, wound exposure time, and anaesthesia time. It saves operating room time and fluoroscopy personnel during the operation. When operating on hip fractures that are planned to be reduced and fixated, we recommend working with two fluoroscopes simultaneously.

Safer mobile fluoroscopy in the trauma theatre: a survey of orthopaedic registrars and theatre staff

The Ionising Radiation (Protection of Persons Undergoing Medical Examination or Treatment) Regulations 1988 (POPUMET) made it compulsory from June 1990 for all staff directing medical exposures to ionising radiation to receive formal tuition at a core knowledge course. This course described the hazards of ionising radiation and the safe use of x-ray equipment. It instructed on the nature of ionising radiation and its interaction with tissues, principles and means of dose reduction to patient and operator, the importance of using the patient’s existing radiological information and statutory responsibilities. The POPUMET course was discontinued following the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (IR(ME)R). IR(ME)R training for healthcare professionals is available as a half-day theoretical course suitable for those designated as ‘referrer’ by their employers. Other locally run ionising radiation protection courses are tailored to the varied requirements of a spectrum of healthcare professionals.

Radiation exposure of eyes, thyroid gland and hands in orthopaedic staff: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Various procedures, especially minimal invasive techniques using fluoroscopy, pose a risk of radiation exposure to orthopaedic staff. Anatomical sites such as the eyes, thyroid glands and hands are more vulnerable to radiation considering the limited use of personal protective devices in the workplace. The objective of the study is to assess the annual mean cumulative and per procedure radiation dose received at anatomical locations like eyes, thyroid glands and hands in orthopaedic staff using systematic review.

METHODS

The review of literature was conducted using systematic search of the database sources like PUBMED and EMBASE using appropriate keywords. The eligibility criteria and the data extraction of literature were based on study design (cohort or cross-sectional study), study population (orthopaedic surgeons or their assistants), exposure (doses of workplace radiation exposure at hands/fingers, eye/forehead, neck/thyroid), language (German and English). The literature search was conducted using a PRISMA checklist and flow chart.

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were found eligible and included for the review. The results show that radiation doses for the anatomical locations of eye, thyroid gland and hands were lower than the dose levels recommended. But there is a considerable variation of radiation dose received at all three anatomical locations mainly due to different situations including procedures (open and minimally invasive), work experience (junior and senior surgeons),distance from the primary and secondary radiation, and use of personal protective equipments (PPEs). The surgeons receive higher radiation dose during minimally invasive procedures compared to open procedures. Junior surgeons are at higher risk of radiation exposure compared to seniors. PPEs play a significant role in reduction of radiation dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current radiation precautions appear to be adequate based on the low dose radiation, more in-depth studies are required on the variations of radiation dose in orthopaedic staff, at different anatomical locations and situations.

ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department

An increasing number of medical specialists are using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments, but there has been general neglect of radiological protection coverage of fluoroscopy machines used outside imaging departments. Lack of radiological protection training of those working with fluoroscopy outside imaging departments can increase the radiation risk to workers and patients. Procedures such as endovascular aneurysm repair, renal angioplasty, iliac angioplasty, ureteric stent placement, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography,and bile duct stenting and drainage have the potential to impart skin doses exceeding Gy. Although tissue reactions among patients and workers from fluoroscopy procedures have, to date, only been reported in interventional radiology and cardiology,the level of fluoroscopy use outside imaging departments creates potential for such injuries.A brief account of the health effects of ionising radiation and protection principles is presented in Section 2. Section 3 deals with general aspects of the protection of workers and patients that are common to all, whereas specific aspects are covered in Section 4 for vascular surgery, urology, orthopaedic surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology,gastroenterology and hepatobiliary system, and anaesthetics and pain management.Although sentinel lymph node biopsy involves the use of radio-isotopic methods rather than fluoroscopy, performance of this procedure in operating theatres is covered in this report as it is unlikely that this topic will be addressed in another ICRP publication in coming years. Information on radiation dose levels to patients and workers, and dose management is presented for each speciality.

Cervical spine imaging using mini--C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to direct and scatter radiation

STUDY DESIGN

Direct and scatter radiation was measured during cadaveric cervical spine imaging with a mini-C-arm fluoroscope.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon when using a mini-C-arm fluoroscope to image the cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prior studies have quantified radiation exposure using large C-arm fluoroscopy during procedures involving the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. To our knowledge, no studies have quantified radiation exposure during mini-C-arm fluoroscopy of the cervical spine.

METHODS

A calibrated OEC MINI 6800 C-arm was used to image a prepared cadaveric cervical spine specimen, which included the skull. The specimen was suspended on an adjustable polycarbonate platform. Thirteen film badge dosimeters were mounted at various positions and angles to detect direct and scatter radiation. Recorded exposure levels were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Surgeon exposures from the mini-C-arm were considerably lower than previously reported with the standard C-arm, but nonetheless concerning. Patient exposures were considerable and not always reduced compared with values from the standard C-arm. The kVp generated by the mini-C-arm was similar to the standard C-arm. Dosimeters mounted in the same plane recorded dissimilar amounts of radiation during the same test, which underscores the influence of shape on the amount of reflected scatter.

CONCLUSIONS

Although using a mini-C-arm unit may reduce exposure levels, substantial exposure to both patient and staff is still achievable. Use of a mini-C-arm for cervical spine imaging reduces exposure to the surgeon more effectively than to the patient. To lower the risk of radiation exposure in the cadaver laboratory, a mini-C-arm should be used in each instance that offers appropriate visualization. In the operating room, all appropriate radiation dose-reducing measures should be strictly enforced by supervising physicians to minimize risk to patients, medical staff, and themselves.

Patient and surgeon radiation exposure: comparison of standard and mini-C-arm fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Use of c-arm fluoroscopy is common in the operating room, outpatient clinic, and emergency department. Consequently, there is a concern regarding radiation exposure. Mini-c-arm fluoroscopes have gained popularity; however, few studies have quantified exposure during mini-c-arm imaging of a body part larger than a hand or wrist. The purpose of this study was to measure radiation exposure sustained by the patient and surgeon during the use of large and mini-c-arm fluoroscopy of an ankle specimen.

METHODS

Standard and mini-c-arm fluoroscopes were used to image a cadaver ankle specimen, which was suspended on an adjustable platform. Dosimeters were mounted at specific positions and angulations to detect direct and scatter radiation. Testing was conducted under various scenarios that altered the proximity of the specimen and the radiation source. We attempted to capture a range of exposure data under conditions ranging from a best to a worst-case scenario, as one may encounter in a procedural setting.

RESULTS

With all configurations tested, measurable exposure during use of the large-c-arm fluoroscope was considerably higher than that during use of the mini-c-arm fluoroscope. Patient and surgeon exposure was notably amplified when the specimen was positioned closer to the x-ray source. The exposure values that we measured during ankle fluoroscopy were consistently higher than the exposure values that have been recorded previously during hand or wrist imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure of the patient and surgeon to radiation depends on the tissue density and the shape of the imaged extremity. Elevated exposure levels can be expected when larger body parts are imaged or when the extremity is positioned closer to the x-ray source. When it is possible to satisfactorily image an extremity with use of the mini c-arm, it should be chosen over its larger counterpart.

Virtual reality assessment of technical skill using the Bonedoc DHS simulator

The Bonedoc DHS simulator is a virtual reality simulator of screw and plate fixation of hip fractures which runs on a standard PC. We hypothesised that the simulator would be able to discriminate between subjects with different levels of operative experience. Three groups (medical students (MSs), basic trainees (BTs), and advanced trainees (ATs)) performed six virtual operations. Measurements included: reduction position, incision length, misplaced drill-holes, final screw placement, X-rays taken, surgical time as well as computer and operative experience. The accuracy, number of X-rays and speed were significantly different between novices and trainee surgeons (p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.05). Intra-articular screw penetration by the medical students occurred 12 times, basic trainees 6 times and advanced trainees twice (p<0.01, MS vs. trainees). Amongst trainees, the advanced trainees placed the lag screw more accurately and took less X-rays (ns). The basic trainees performed the complete procedure fastest at 6 min compared to ATs at 9 min (p<0.05) but were not as accurate. The Bonedoc DHS simulator provides a means to discriminate between novices and trainee surgeons.

Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation

STUDY DESIGN

A cadaveric cervical spine specimen is imaged with a standard C-arm fluoroscope during a simulated procedure. Patient and surgeon exposure to radiation is estimated by placing dosimeters at various locations in 3-dimensional space.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to patient and surgeon when using C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated cadaveric surgical procedure involving the cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA

The use of mobile fluoroscopy has become commonplace in orthopaedics. With the current trend towards minimal access techniques, fluoroscopy has become requisite to achieving satisfactory outcomes. Studies have shown that spine surgeons may be at elevated risk for radiation exposure compared to other orthopaedists. Exposure while using C-arm fluoroscopy for procedures involving the pelvis, as well as thoracic and lumbar spine has been documented. However, there are no equivalent studies that evaluate exposure during cervical spine imaging.

METHODS

A standard OEC 9800 C-arm was used to image a prepared cadaveric cervical spine specimen, which was suspended on an adjustable platform. Film badge dosimeters were mounted at various positions and angles to detect direct and scatter radiation. Testing was conducted in various radiation dose mapping "scenarios." The configurations tested altered the proximity of the specimen and jig relative to the radiation source. We attempted to capture radiation exposure in various locations, from a best-case to a worst-case scenario, as may be realistically encountered in a procedural setting. RESULTS.: Potential exposure to the patient and surgeon were consistently measurable, and of concern. As the imaged specimen was positioned closer to the radiation source, exposure to the patient was markedly amplified. Exposure to the surgeon did not increase as dramatically. There was a great degree of variability in the exposure doses recorded by the peripheral dosimeters. Even dosimeters that were placed in the same plane diverged widely in their measured exposure. This highlights the influence of the shape of the imaged specimen on reflected scatter. Scatter radiation doses on both sides of the specimen were similar.

CONCLUSION

Care should be taken when working on both sides of the imaged subject. Considerable radiation exposure can be encountered when working with a C-arm fluoroscope if appropriate precautions are not observed. All appropriate radiation dose-reducing measures should be strictly enforced by the supervising physician to minimize risk to the patient and the medical team.

Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during fixation of hip fracture and fracture of ankle: Effect of surgical experience

BACKGROUND

Over the years, there has been a tremendous increase in the use of fluoroscopy in orthopaedics. The risk of contracting cancer is significantly higher for an orthopedic surgeon. Hip and spine surgeries account for 99% of the total radiation dose. The amount of radiation to patients and operating surgeon depends on the position of the patient and the type of protection used during the surgery. A retrospective study to assess the influence of the radiation exposure of the operating surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted fixation of fractures of neck of femur (dynamic hip screw) and ankle (Weber B) was performed at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with undisplaced intertrochanteric fracture were included in the hip group, and 60 patients with isolated fracture of lateral malleolus without communition were included in the ankle group. The hip and ankle groups were further divided into subgroups of 20 patients each depending on the operative experience of the operating surgeon. All patients had fluoroscopically assisted fixation of fracture by the same approach and technique. The radiation dose and screening time of each group were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The radiation dose and screening time during fluoroscopically assisted fixation of fracture neck of femur were significantly high with surgeons and trainees with less than 3 years of surgical experience in comparison with surgeons with more than 10 years of experience. The radiation dose and screening time during fluoroscopically assisted fixation of Weber B fracture of ankle were relatively independent of operating surgeon's surgical experience.

CONCLUSION

The experience of operating surgeon is one of the important factors affecting screening time and radiation dose during fluoroscopically assisted fixation of fracture neck of femur. The use of snapshot pulsed fluoroscopy and involvement of senior surgeons could significantly reduce the radiation dose and screening time.

Navigating the fluoroscope's C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow

OBJECTIVES

During complex image-guided orthopedic trauma procedures, repetitive fluoroscopic scout imaging is performed. A number of preparatory positioning images often must be taken to reproduce a comparable projection. These scout images have no intrinsic clinical relevance but nevertheless expose the patient and the surgical team to considerable radiation, which could be avoided. This study presents and validates a method to decrease intraoperative radiation.

METHODS

Precision, time requirements, and number of scout images for repositioning the fluoroscope, with and without navigation aid, were recorded on 20 test-rig and 3 phantom setups. A commercially available image-guided surgical navigation system (Vector Vision, BrainLAB), originally designed for instrument navigation, was employed to register and retrieve the C-arm positions. A newly developed software computed the necessary moves to reposition the C-arm on an intuitive visual display.

RESULTS

Retrieving a given C-arm position with the conventional non-navigated technique required an average of 7 scout images (range, 3 to 12 images). In contrast, navigation-assisted repositioning did not necessitate a single scout image. Deviations from the original projection were minimal for both navigated (0.9 degrees, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.1 degrees) and non-navigated repositioning (0.8 degrees, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9 degrees). Average positioning times were comparable when navigating the C-arm (46 seconds, 95% CI 41 to 51 seconds) and in scout image-based positioning (49 seconds, 95% CI 44 to 53 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Navigated C-arm positioning avoids multiple scout images and yields sufficient precision for clinical deployment. Radiation exposure can be reduced considerably by a combination of instrument navigation and navigated C-arm positioning.

Measurement of the dose of radiation to the surgeon during surgery to the foot and ankle

We carried out a prospective study over a period of 12 months to measure the exposure to radiation of the hands of a dedicated foot and ankle surgeon. A thermoluminescent dosimeter ring (TLD) was used to measure the cumulative dose of radiation. Fluoroscopy was used in operations on the foot and ankle. The total screening time was 3028 s, with a mean time per procedure of 37.4 s (0.6 to 197). This correlated positively with the number of procedures performed (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), and with the dose of radiation in both the left (r = 0.85, p = 0.0005) and right TLDs (r = 0.59, p = 0.419). There was no significant difference in the dose of radiation between the two hands (t-test, p = 0.62). The total dose to the right TLD over the 12 months was 2.4 millisieverts.

This is a simple and convenient method for evaluating the exposure of a single surgeon to radiation. The radiation detected was well below the annual dose limit set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Ionising radiation exposure to orthopaedic trainees: the effect of sub-specialty training

INTRODUCTION

We monitored image intensifier use by orthopaedic trainees to assess their exposure to ionising radiation and to investigate the influence of sub-specialty training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five different orthopaedic registrars recorded their monthly image intensifier screening times and exposure doses for all cases (trauma and elective), for a combined total of 12 non-consecutive months. Radiation exposure was monitored using shoulder and waist film badges worn both by surgeons and radiographers screening their cases.

RESULTS

Registrars in spinal sub-specialties were exposed to significantly higher doses per case and cumulative doses per month than non-spinal trainees (P < 0.05), but significantly lower screening times per case (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cumulative screening times per month (P > 0.05). Regression analysis for all surgeons showed a significant relationship between shoulder film badge reading and cumulative dose exposed per month (P < 0.05), but not for cumulative screening time. Shoulder film badge recordings were significantly higher for spinal compared with non-spinal registrars (P < 0.05), although all badges were below the level for radiation reporting. Only one radiographer badge recorded a dose above threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst the long-term effects of sub-reporting doses of radiation are not fully understood, we consider that this study demonstrates that trainees should not be complacent in accepting inadequate radiation protection. The higher doses encountered with spinal imaging means that sub-specialty trainees should be alerted to the risk of their increased exposure. The principle of minimising radiation exposure must be maintained by all trainees at all times.

Radiation exposure in hand surgery: mini versus standard C-arm

PURPOSE

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in hand surgery is common. Two types of fluoroscopic units are available: the mini C-arm and the standard C-arm. There is little literature on the radiation exposure from the mini C-arm, therefore, the primary goal of this study was to quantify and compare the amount of radiation exposure to members of the surgical team (surgeon, first assistant, nurse, anesthesiologist) using both standard and mini C-arms in a simulated wrist surgery setup. Mini C-arm positioning was also examined to determine the safest configuration to minimize radiation exposure to surgeons.

METHODS

Radiation dosimeters were used to test 2 commercially available fluoroscopy units in a simulated wrist surgery setup with a cadaveric upper extremity. Several different configurations of the C-arms were tested to determine radiation exposure rates to surgeons and the operating room staff.

RESULTS

The mean in-beam radiation exposures with the use of the mini and standard C-arms were 3,720 mR/h and 6,540 mR/h, respectively. The mini C-arm had universally less radiation exposure than the standard C-arm in the clinical configurations tested. The safest configuration of mini C-arm use to minimize radiation exposure was with the surgeon standing on the image intensifier side of the unit as compared with the source side. Mini C-arm radiation exposure to the hands, groin, chest, and thyroid of the operating surgeons were well below the National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurement's annual dose limits.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical configurations tested in this study the mini C-arm had lower radiation exposures than the standard C-arm. To reduce radiation exposure maximally surgeons should stand behind the lead-encased image intensifier and should use techniques to reduce exposure.

Computer-assisted guidewire insertion for hip fracture fixation

OBJECTIVE

: This study was designed to test in a laboratory setting a novel computer-assisted fluoroscopic technique and a conventional fluoroscopic technique for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of hip fractures. Our hypothesis is that a novel computer-assisted fluoroscopic technique will achieve acceptable guidewire placement in one pass, with decreased fluoroscopic time and with accuracy and precision better than conventional technique.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trials.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty, Sawbone, femur phantoms.

INTERVENTION

Dynamic hip screw guidewires were inserted into 15 femur phantoms under fluoroscopic guidance by using computer-assisted fluoroscopic ORIF technique, and 15 femurs were inserted by using a conventional fluoroscopic-assisted ORIF technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Ideal guidewire placement was defined as the center of the femoral head, 5 mm from the apical bone edge on anteroposterior and lateral views. Accuracy was measured as distance to ideal placement, and the number of passes and fluoroscopic time were noted for each trial.

RESULTS

The computer-assisted technique achieved an average guidewire placement that was as accurate as the conventional technique in fewer passes, 1.1 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- standard deviation) compared with 2.4 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.0001), respectively, and with fewer fluoroscopic images, 2 +/- 0 compared with 13.5 +/- 3 (P < 0.0002), respectively. Guidewire placement in both groups was within the tip-apex distance defined by Baumgaertner et al.

CONCLUSIONS

The computer-assisted technique was significantly more accurate and precise than conventional technique. It also required fewer drill tracks through the femur and exposed the patient and the surgical team to significantly less ionizing radiation.

Defining the Learning Curve for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

To define the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using three potential surrogate markers of surgical expertise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The learning curve of an endourologist with no previous experience at performing solo PCNL was studied. Three putative parameters of expertise were reviewed, namely, operating time, fluoroscopic screening time, and radiation dose. Operations were analyzed in cohorts of 15 to determine when a plateau was reached for all three variables. Comparison was then made with the results of a surgeon who had performed more than 1600 PCNLs. Stone type and stone clearance rate were also noted.

RESULTS

The mean operating time of the novice surgeon fell to a plateau of 92 minutes after 60 cases, but screening time and radiation dose did not plateau until case 115, when values of 231 seconds and 406 cGy/cm2 were recorded, respectively. The senior surgeon had a mean operating time of 98 minutes and screening parameters equivalent to those of the novice surgeon after 115 cases. The complexity of the stones tackled grew with increasing experience, although stone-free rates remained constant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of the learning curve of a single surgeon suggests that competence at performing PCNL is reached after 60 cases and excellence after 115. Radiation parameters are a valuable tool in the assessment of operative competence.

Image-guided reconstruction of femoral fractures: is the staff progeny safe?

The potential of adverse effects to progeny caused by preconceptual and fetal exposure to ionizing radiation is an issue of increasing concern to orthopaedic surgeons and assisting staff. Are these fears justified? How effectively is the embryo or fetus protected, and should pregnant staff alter their duties? In this study, an anthropomorphic phantom was exposed fluoroscopically at two geometries common in surgical reconstruction of proximal femur fractures. Scatter radiation was converted to gonadal dose and embryo or fetal dose with and without use of a protective apron. The genetic risk for the orthopaedic surgeon after 10 years of occupational exposure was estimated to be 16,000 times lower than the natural frequency of heritable disease. The excess risk of childhood cancer associated with the dose accumulated during gestation was at least 600 times lower than the corresponding natural frequency. A properly shielded pregnant orthopaedic surgeon is allowed to do 14 hours of hip fluoroscopy during gestation, whereas 2100 hours of fluoroscopy are required for the induction of gross malformation or mental retardation to the growing embryo or fetus. The supplementary dose constraints for pregnant staff provide adequate protection to the unborn child without affecting regular personnel duties.