Ground state electron transfer between TCNE and one or more 16-electron species containing vanadium, osmium, ruthenium or cobalt

Tetranuclear Complexes of [Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]+ with TCNX Ligands (TCNX = TCNE, TCNQ, TCNB): Intramolecular Electron Transfer Alternatives in Compounds (μ4-TCNX)[MLn]4

The complexes {(mu4-TCNX)[Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]4}(BF4)4 were prepared as light-sensitive materials from [Fe(CO)2(C5H5) (THF)](BF4) and the corresponding TCNX ligands (TCNE = tetracyanoethene, TCNQ=7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethane, TCNB=1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene). Whereas the TCNE and TCNQ complexes are extremely easily reduced species with reduction potentials>+0.3 V vs ferrocenium/ferrocene, the tetranuclear complex of TCNB exhibits a significantly more negative reduction potential at about -1.0 V. Even for the complexes with strongly pi-accepting TCNE and TCNQ, the very positive reduction potentials, the unusually high nitrile stretching frequencies>2235 cm(-1), and the high-energy charge-transfer transitions indicate negligible metal-to-ligand electron transfer in the ground state, corresponding to a largely unperturbed (TCNX degrees)(FeII)4 formulation of oxidation states as caused by orthogonality between the metal-centered HOMO and the pi* LUMO of TCNX. Mössbauer spectroscopy confirms the low-spin iron(II) state, and DFT calculations suggest coplanar TCNE and TCNQ bridging ligands in the complex tetracations. One-electron reduction to the 3+ forms of the TCNE and TCNQ complexes produces EPR spectra which confirm the predominant ligand character of the then singly occupied MO through isotropic g values slightly below 2, in addition to a negligible g anisotropy of frozen solutions at frequencies up to 285 GHz and also through an unusually well-resolved solution X band EPR spectrum of {(mu4-TCNE)[Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]4}3+ which shows the presence of four equivalent [Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]+ moieties through 57Fe and 13C(CO) hyperfine coupling in nonenriched material. DFT calculations reproduce the experimental EPR data. A survey of discrete TCNE and TCNQ complexes [(mu4-TCNX)(MLn)4] exhibits a dichotomy between the systems {(mu4-TCNX)[Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]4}4+ and {(mu4-TCNQ)[Re(CO)3(bpy)]4}4+ with their negligible metal-to-ligand electron transfer and several other compounds of TCNE or TCNQ with Mn, Ru, Os, or Cu complex fragments which display evidence for a strong such interaction, i.e., an appreciable value delta in the formulation {(mu4-TCNXdelta-)[Mx+delta/4Ln]4}. Irreversibility of the first reduction of {(mu4-TCNB)[Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]4}(BF4)4 precluded spectroelectrochemical studies; however, the high-energy CN stretching frequencies and charge transfer absorptions of that TCNB analogue also confirm the exceptional position of the complexes {(mu4-TCNX)[Fe(CO)2(C5H5)]4}(BF4)4.

Tetracyanoethylene (TCNE): The Characteristic Geometries and Vibrational Absorptions of Its Numerous Structures

Tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) undergoes numerous reactions and is reported to exist in many structural motifs. Identification of these forms and motifs can be challenging. Nonetheless, the number of nu(CN) absorptions and their frequencies provide insight with respect to the specific forms and charge on the TCNE fragment. Particularly informative is the average of the fundamental nu(CN) bands, as well as the length of the central C-C bond. This Review discusses the assignment of structure and formal charge for TCNE-containing compounds. Scrutiny of previous assignments reveals some discrepancies which are discussed, and provides a basis for further study of TCNE structure-function relationships. Several multimetal complexes with bridging [TCNE](z) units exhibit mixed valency and extensive delocalization. The scarcity of suitable model compounds, especially those with M(d(pi-pi*)) backbonding to the CN groups, have thwarted the detailed description of these valence ambiguous compounds; thus, new well-characterized polynuclear compounds are needed.

Construction of Copper(I) Coordination Polymers of 1,2,4,5-Tetracyanobenzene with Zigzag Sheet and Porous Frameworks

This paper describes two copper(I) supramolecules with the same anion and cation but quite different topologies and properties. The reaction of [Cu(CH(3)CN)(4)]PF(6) and 1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene (TCNB) leads to two novel polymeric coordination compounds, [Cu(2)(TCNB)(3)](PF(6))(2)(Me(2)CO)(4)( )()(1) and [Cu(2)(TCNB)(3)](PF(6))(2) (2), depending on the solvents used. The crystal structures have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Crystal data are as follows. 1: C(21)H(15)N(6)O(2)CuPF(6), monoclinic, P2(1)/a, a = 11.553(4) Å, b = 16.135(7) Å, c = 15.046(3) Å, beta = 108.08(2) degrees, Z = 4. 2: C(15)H(3)N(6)CuPF(6), orthorhombic, Cmcm, a = 28.282(3) Å, b = 10.337(3) Å, c = 16.285(4) Å, Z = 16. In both polymers, copper(I) ions have similar pseudotetrahedral environments and the four coordination sites are fully occupied by the four bridging ligands, two &mgr;(2)-TCNB and two &mgr;(4)-TCNB groups. Polymer 1, obtained in acetone, revealed a two-dimensional zigzag sheet network between copper(I) ions, whereas 2, synthesized in methylethyl ketone, displayed a three-dimensional porous framework with different functional groups (or atom) in different cavities. The redox, magnetic, and conductive behaviors of both complexes are discussed. It is demonstrated that the two complexes give different physicochemical properties.

Paramagnetism of Tetranuclear Complexes between TCNX Ligands (TCNE, TCNQ, TCNB) and Four Pentaammineruthenium or Dicarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)manganese Fragments

The tetranuclear complexes {(&mgr;(4)-TCNX)[Ru(NH(3))(5)](4)}(A)(8) and (&mgr;(4)-TCNX)[Mn(CO)(2)(C(5)Me(5))](4) [A = PF(6) or CF(3)SO(3); TCNX = TCNE (tetracyanoethene), TCNQ (7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethane), or TCNB (1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene)] were studied by variable-temperature (2-300 K) SQUID susceptometry. Mono- and dinuclear species [(PhCN)Ru(NH(3))(5)](PF(6))(2) (PhCN = benzonitrile) and {(&mgr;-L)[Ru(NH(3))(5)](2)}(PF(6))(4) (L = 1,4-dicyanobenzene (terephthalodinitrile) or pyrazine) were also investigated for comparison and were found to be essentially diamagnetic. Despite the even electron count, both the ruthenium and manganese tetranuclear complexes are paramagnetic, albeit with different spin-spin exchange coupling patterns. The manganese systems are characterized by exchange-coupled S = 1 states at the individual metal centers, whereas the magnetic behavior of the tetranuclear ruthenium compounds results from an exchange-coupling interaction between two S = (1)/(2) sites, identified as Ru(III)/Ru(II) mixed-valence pairs.