[Laparoscopic fundoplication: current data]

Same day discharge for benign laparoscopic hiatal surgery: a feasibility analysis

BACKGROUND

Advances in minimally invasive surgery and the development of enhanced recovery pathways have favored the spread of day-surgery programs. Despite laparoscopic approaches being accepted as the standard of care for benign hiatal diseases, safety and feasibility of same day discharges for laparoscopic hiatal surgeries other than fundoplication has yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of same day discharge for primary and revisional laparoscopic hiatal surgeries including paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEHR), fundoplication for reflux, and Heller myotomy (±diverticulectomy).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hiatal procedures in the division of Thoracic surgery between 2011 and 2016 at McGill University Health Centre was performed. Planned day-surgery (DAYCASE) was compared to planned inpatient (INPATIENT) cohorts with respect to operative and postoperative outcomes, length of stay, readmission, and emergency room visits.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients were identified, 161 female (62%); median age 62 (20). The case distribution was: PEHR (123; 47.1%), Heller myotomy (94;36%, 7 diverticulectomy), and fundoplication (44; 16.9%). Twenty patients had revisional procedures (7.7%). Same day discharge was planned in 98 cases (38%) and was successful in 80 (81.6%). Proportion of DAYCASE increased form 12% prior to 2013 to 67% in 2016. INPATIENTs were older (median 66 vs. 60 years), and had a higher proportion of PEHR (55 vs. 34%), p < 0.05. Both cohorts were comparable in gender proportion, ASA classification, and length of surgery. Complications, readmission, and emergency visits did not differ between the two cohorts. On multivariate analysis, female gender (OR 37, 95% CI 1.46-936, p = 0.028), surgery beginning after noon (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.1-26.9, p = 0.038), intraoperative complications (OR 20.4 95% CI 1.5-286, p = 0.025), and postoperative complications (OR 52.1, 95% CI 4.5-602, p = 0.002) were independently associated with unplanned admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Day-case surgery for complex laparoscopic hiatal procedures is feasible and can be achieved in a significant number of patients without compromising safety.

Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been developed in order to increase patients' satisfaction and to save bed costs. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ambulatory surgery in patients undergoing elective fundoplication for GERD.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched and identified 15 prospective or retrospective nonrandomized studies dealing with ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD in the Medline, Cancerlit, and Embase databases between January 1990 and July 2010. Outcomes were postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates, mean operative time, hospital admission or readmission, unexpected consultation, and patient satisfaction. Because only one comparative study was identified, data compilation and relative risk evaluation through meta-analysis were not possible.

RESULTS

A total of 1459 adult patients underwent an ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD, 876 in a day-case setting and 583 in an outpatient setting. The procedure appears feasible for selected patients and expert surgeons, and it has a very low mortality rate and conversion, reoperation, and overall morbidity rates of 3.6, 0.6, and 11.1%, respectively. Hospital admission, nonprogrammed consultation, and hospital readmission rates were as high as 20, 11, and 12%, respectively. No study looked at comparative long-term functional results between ambulatory and inpatient procedures. Patient satisfaction rates based on self-evaluation were high.

CONCLUSION

The data available to date in the literature, mostly of level 4 evidence, suggest that laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD appears to be safe and feasible in a day-surgery setting, subject to careful patient selection and surgeon expertise. Randomized control trials are urgently needed to better evaluate this promising care management.

The safety of the same-day discharge for selected patients after laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the acceptability, feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in an university-based tertiary care center.

METHODS

The procedure was proposed as routine for patients with proven symptomatic uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease fulfilling predetermined inclusion criteria from September 2003 to December 2005. Standard anesthetic, surgical, analgesic, and antiemetic protocols were used. Acceptability, admission, complication, and reoperation rates and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Postoperative pain and nausea were assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) was administered before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Among 100 patients screened, 40 (40%) were included. Seven patients were admitted because of inadequate pain control (n = 3), nausea or vomiting (n = 3), or anxiety (n = 1); 33 were discharged as planned 6 to 8 hours after operation. Only 1 patient was readmitted and reoperated because of fundoplicature migration following uncontrolled vomiting. At follow-up, 92.5% of patients were satisfied with the day-case treatment. If offered a similar operation in the future, 82.5% of patients would have accepted day-case treatment. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index was 90.7 (+/-21.2) preoperatively compared with 105.8 (+/-21.8) postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Day-case laparoscopic fundoplication is feasible in selected patients. However, (1) strict control of postoperative nausea and pain is essential, and (2) preoperative standardized education program for ambulatory surgery might be useful in order to enhance patient acceptability and satisfaction rates.

Endobrachyœsophage : place de la chirurgie antireflux

The aim of this study was to review the literature about the effect of antireflux surgery on the metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Antireflux operations (by laparotomy or laparoscopy) can alter the natural history of Barrett's oesophagus, allowing disease stabilization in a substantial proportion of patients without high grade dysplasia at time of surgery. It also may induce complete or partial regression of Barrett's epithelium, especially for short segment of Barrett's oesophagus, but in unpredictable manner. While regression of low-grade dysplasia is commonly observed, histologic progression is rarely observed after effective antireflux surgery. However, ineffective antireflux surgery expose to histologic progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. These data support the need for a long-term clinical, endoscopic, and histologic follow-up program after antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.