Evidence based approach for the management of mixed hyperlipidaemia

Niacin and fibrate use among patients with high triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

BACKGROUND

National guidelines recommend treating low HDL and/or high triglycerides (TG) with adjunctive therapy that supplements statin monotherapy in patients with multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Niacin and fibrates have been shown in clinical trials to be effective as adjunctive therapy for these lipid abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of low HDL and high TG in real-world practice by assessing a large managed-care population with CVD risk factors enrolled in a commercial health plan.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Complete lipid panel results (LDL, HDL, TG) obtained between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2006 (index lab) were available for all participants. Subjects were observed 180 days pre-index to determine which CVD risk factors were present (male aged 45+, female 55+, coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Patients whose LDL was at goal but who had low HDL and high TG were assessed for lipid treatment status by evaluating outpatient pharmacy claims 6 months pre- and post-index.

RESULTS

Treatment with any lipid therapy increased for all risk groups, and by total risk factors, from pre-index to post-index. Use of fibrates and niacin, alone or in combination with a statin, also increased for all risk groups, and by total risk factors as well, but was below expectations based on guideline recommendations. For example, among patients with 4 risk factors, <20% of patients with low HDL/high TG received niacin and/or a fibrate post-index date.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that in actual clinical practice, niacin and fibrates are underutilized in the treatment of low HDL and high TG. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.

High prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and other dyslipidemic phenotypes in an Iranian population

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of different atherogenic dyslipidemic phenotypes, especially decreased serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in an Iranian population and its relationship to other coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor.

METHODS

The prevalence of lipid abnormalities was assessed in 2941 people, including 1396 males and 1545 females, aged more than 20 years. The population is representative of Iranian urban adults living in northwestern Iran. In addition to isolated forms of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypoalphalipoproteinemia, some dyslipidemic phenotypes including hypertriglyceridemia/low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) combination, mixed dyslipidemias, and severe dyslipidemias were assessed.

RESULTS

The most prevalent abnormality was low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C; 73% including 63% for men and 93.3% for women). Hypertriglyceridemia (>150 mg/dL) was the second most prevalent abnormality (40.6%). Increased total cholesterol (>200 mg/dL) was observed in 35.4% of the subjects. The combination of hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C was observed in 9.9% of the population. Fifty eight percent of the low HDL-C cases were not accompanied with hypertriglyceridemia, and 24.4% of hypertriglyceridemic subjects had low HDL-C. Among subjects younger than 30 years, 19% had hypercholesterolemia, 13% had isolated low HDL-C less than 35 mg/dL, and 63% had HDL-C less than 40 mg/dL. Unexpectedly, except for the hypertriglyceridemia/low HDL-C pattern, which was more common in males, the other abnormal lipid profiles were more common in females.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of dyslipidemia, especially low HDL cholesterol, in Iranian adults is very high. Urgent preventive programs and changes in lifestyle are needed in this area.

Ciprofibrate therapy in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol: greater reduction of non-HDL cholesterol in subjects with excess body weight (The CIPROAMLAT study)

Background

Hypertriglyceridemia in combination with low HDL cholesterol levels is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of ciprofibrate for the treatment of this form of dyslipidemia and to identify factors associated with better treatment response.

Methods

Multicenter, international, open-label study. Four hundred and thirty seven patients were included. The plasma lipid levels at inclusion were fasting triglyceride concentrations between 1.6–3.9 mM/l and HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.05 mM/l for women and ≤ 0.9 mM/l for men. The LDL cholesterol was below 4.2 mM/l. All patients received ciprofibrate 100 mg/d. Efficacy and safety parameters were assessed at baseline and at the end of the treatment. The primary efficacy parameter of the study was percentage change in triglycerides from baseline.

Results

After 4 months, plasma triglyceride concentrations were decreased by 44% (p < 0.001). HDL cholesterol concentrations were increased by 10% (p < 0.001). Non-HDL cholesterol was decreased by 19%. A greater HDL cholesterol response was observed in lean patients (body mass index < 25 kg/m²) compared to the rest of the population (8.2 vs 19.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, cases with excess body weight had a larger decrease in non-HDL cholesterol levels (-20.8 vs -10.8%, p < 0.001). There were no significant complications resulting from treatment with ciprofibrate.

Conclusions

Ciprofibrate is efficacious for the correction of hypertriglyceridemia / low HDL cholesterol. A greater decrease in non-HDL cholesterol was found among cases with excess body weight. The mechanism of action of ciprofibrate may be influenced by the pathophysiology of the disorder being treated.

Prospective, noninterventional, uncontrolled, open-chart, pharmacoepidemiologic study of prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs at a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India

BACKGROUND

The guidelines for management of dyslipidemia released by the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have been questioned for their relevance in the South Asian Indian populations because these populations are reported to have significantly different lipoprotein parameters and atherogenic risk factors than Western populations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine current prescribing patterns for lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) adopted by physicians in North India.

METHODS

This prospective, noninterventional, uncontrolled, open-chart, pharmacoepidemiologic study was conducted from June 2000 to August 2000 at a tertiary care hospital in North India and included 200 dyslipidemic patients. The pattern of prescribing LLDs was recorded, along with the serum levels of lipid parameters-total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a])-at the time of initiating LLD therapy and compared with the 1993 NCEP-II therapeutic guidelines for dyslipidemia management.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) levels of lipid parameters in the study population were as follows: TC, 223.2 (21.5) mg/dL; TG, 258.4 (61.3) mg/dL; LDL-C, 131.6 (26.5) mg/dL; HDL-C, 39.8 (8.9) mg/dL; and Lp(a), 44.8 (26.8) mg/dL. The LLDs prescribed were fibrates (53.5%) and statins (46.5%). Forty percent of patients prescribed LLDs did not meet the NCEP-II criteria for initiation of LLD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable differences in prescribing patterns of LLDs were observed compared with the then-prevalent NCEP-II guidelines. However, due to the abnormally high serum Lp(a) levels present in the average dyslipidemia profile in South Asian Indian populations, this pattern was in accordance with the specific recommendations made for these populations, as well as with the 2001 NCEP-III guidelines.

Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia

Atorvastatin is a synthetic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. In dosages of 10 to 80 mg/day, atorvastatin reduces levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol in patients with a wide variety of dyslipidaemias. In large long-term trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. atorvastatin produced greater reductions in total cholesterol. LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), atorvastatin was more efficacious than lovastatin, pravastatin. fluvastatin and simvastatin in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels and, in high doses, produced very low LDL-cholesterol levels. Aggressive reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol to 1.9 mmol/L with atorvastatin 80 mg/day for 16 weeks in patients with acute coronary syndromes significantly reduced the incidence of the combined primary end-point events and the secondary end-point of recurrent ischaemic events requiring rehospitalisation in the large. well-designed MIRACL trial. In the AVERT trial, aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/ day for 18 months was at least as effective as coronary angioplasty and usual care in reducing the incidence of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable CHD. Long-term studies are currently investigating the effects of atorvastatin on serious cardiac events and mortality in patients with CHD. Pharmacoeconomic studies have shown lipid-lowering with atorvastatin to be cost effective in patients with CHD, men with at least one risk factor for CHD and women with multiple risk factors for CHD. In available studies atorvastatin was more cost effective than most other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels. Atorvastatin is well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The tolerability profile of atorvastatin is similar to that of other available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and to placebo. Elevations of liver transaminases and creatine phosphokinase are infrequent. There have been rare case reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring with concomitant use of atorvastatin and other drugs.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin is an appropriate first-line lipid-lowering therapy in numerous groups of patients at low to high risk of CHD. Additionally it has a definite role in treating patients requiring greater decreases in LDL-cholesterol levels. Long-term studies are under way to determine whether achieving very low LDL-cholesterol levels with atorvastatin is likely to show additional benefits on morbidity and mortality in patients with CHD.

Both cerivastatin and fenofibrate improve arterial vasoreactivity in patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cerivastatin and fenofibrate on endothelium dependent and independent arterial dilation.

DESIGN

In a prospective, double blind study, 38 overweight, nonsmoking, males aged between 40 and 60 years with combined hyperlipidaemia were randomized and, after 6 weeks run-in phase with American Heart Association step I diet treatment, submitted to 12 weeks' treatment either with fenofibrate (250 mg daily) or cerivastatin. Cerivastatin was given in a daily dose of 0.2 mg for 6 weeks and was increased to 0.4 mg daily, if the LDL-C did not decrease below 3.0 mmol x L(-1). Flow-mediated (endothelium-dependent) dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-induced (endothelium-independent) [gliceryltrinitrate (GTN)] dilation of brachial artery were measured using high resolution ultrasound.

RESULTS

The FMD increased from 3.4 +/- 3.3 to 9.3 +/- 2.4% (P < 0.001) in the cerivastatin group, and from 3.3 +/- 2.8 to 6.5 +/- 3.1% (P < 0.001) in the fenofibrate group, the improvement being significantly better after cerivastatin (P=0.006). GTN increased from 11.5 +/- 4.1 to 16.2 +/- 3.5% (P < 0.01) and from 11.1 +/- 2.5 to 16.0 +/- 2.9% (P < 0.01), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Cerivastatin reduced total cholesterol by 24%, LDL-cholesterol by 31%, triglycerides by 24%, ox-LDL by 29% and increased HDL-cholesterol by 5%, whilst, after fenofibrate, these changes were -15, -13, -41, -17 and 18%, respectively. Only the decrease of LDL-C turned out to be an independent predictor the FMD improvement. The improvement in GTN-induced dilation did not correlate with the changes in blood lipids.

CONCLUSIONS

Both cerivastatin and fenofibrate lead to an improvement of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent dilation of brachial artery in overweight patients with combined hyperlipidaemia and no other atherosclerotic risk factors. The effects on FMD were greater in subjects receiving cerivastatin than in subjects receiving fenofibrate, but the effects on GTN were equal in both groups.