Photoaffinity labeling of the Ah receptor with 3-[3H]methylcholanthrene and formation of a 165-kDa complex between the ligand-binding subunit and a novel cytosolic protein

Drug metabolic activity of cultured hepatocytes can synchronize with bile acid concentration in the medium

The regulation of drug metabolic activity of cultured hepatocytes can be applied to the evaluation of pharmacokinetics, analysis of drug delivery and the bioartificial liver system. It is very difficult to maintain the drug metabolic activity mediated by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A. Recently we found that the CYP3A aminopyrine N-demethylase (AMND) activity of hepatocytes cultured on collagen surface oscillated with culture time. This phenomenon was related to the concentration of bile acid in the culture medium. CYP3A, multidrug resistant gene 2 (MDR2) and heat shock protein 84 (HSP84) mRNA appeared in a manner corresponding to this oscillation. When a large quantity of bile acid was taken up into hepatocytes from the medium, low AMND activity was observed, and these proteins did not appear. When bile acid was secreted and the bile acid concentration inside the hepatocytes was low, high AMND activity was obtained, and these proteins appeared. In order to clarify the mechanism of oscillation between AMND activity and bile acid, 8 microM glycocholic acid was added to the culture medium 15 h before the measurement. No oscillation in AMND activity was observed in the presence of 8 microM glycocholic acid. Bile acid controls the AMND activity in the transcription of hepatocytes.

In vivo up-regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in a dioxin-resistant rat model

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and regulates expression of several genes such as CYP1A1. Little is known about what regulates expression of the AHR itself. We tested the ability of TCDD to alter in vivo expression of its own receptor in rat strains that are susceptible to TCDD lethality [Long-Evans (Turku AB) (L-E) and Sprague Dawley (SD)] and in a rat strain that is remarkably resistant to TCDD lethality [Han/Wistar (Kuopio) (H/W)]. Rats were administered a single, intragastric dose of 5 or 50 microg/kg of TCDD. Hepatic cytosol, nuclear extract, and RNA were prepared at 1, 4, and 10 days after TCDD exposure. AHR expression was assessed at three levels: ligand binding function, immunoreactive protein and mRNA. TCDD at 5 microg/kg produced a 2- to 3-fold increase in cytosolic AHR in all strains; 50 microg/kg produced depletion at day 1 followed by recovery in SD and H/W but not L-E rats. Both the increase in AHR above basal levels and the recovery from initial depletion were accompanied by elevations in steady-state AHR mRNA, suggesting a pre-translational mechanism for AHR regulation by its own ligand. This up-regulation in vivo is in contrast to the sustained depletion of AHR caused by TCDD in cell culture. There was no clear relationship between AHR regulation and strain sensitivity; thus, the large inherent strain differences in susceptibility to TCDD lethality probably are not explained by differential regulation of AHR by TCDD.

Physicochemical differences in the AH receptors of the most TCDD-susceptible and the most TCDD-resistant rat strains

Long-Evans rats (strain Turku AB; L-E) are at least 1000-fold more sensitive (LD50 about 10 microg/kg) to the acute lethal effects of 2, 3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) than are Han/Wistar (Kuopio; H/W) rats (LD50 > 9600 microg/kg). The AH receptor (AHR) is believed to mediate the toxic effects of TCDD and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. We compared the AHRs of L-E and H/W rats to determine if there were any structural or functional receptor differences that might be related to the dramatic difference in the sensitivity of these two strains to the lethal effects of TCDD. Cytosols from liver and lung of the sensitive L-E rats contained about twofold higher levels of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD than occurred in H/W rats; the Kd for binding of [3H]TCDD to AHR in hepatic cytosols was similar between the two strains. Addition of the oxyanions, molybdate or tungstate (20 mM), had little effect upon ligand binding to AHR in hepatic cytosols from L-E rats whereas in cytosols from H/W rats these agents substantially diminished or totally abolished TCDD binding. The AHR in H/W cytosols also lost ligand-binding function when NaCl (20 to 400 mM) was added to the buffer whereas, in cytosols from L-E rats, the addition of 400 mM NaCl caused the receptor complex to shift from 9S to 6S during velocity sedimentation but did not destroy ligand binding function. AHR from hepatic cytosol of both the L-E and H/W rats could be transformed to the DNA-binding state in the presence of TCDD or other dioxin congeners as assessed by gel mobility shift assays. The most dramatic difference in AHR properties between L-E and H/W rats is molecular mass. Immunoblotting of cytosolic proteins revealed that the AHR in L-E rats has an apparent mass of approximately 106 kDa, similar to the mass of the receptor previously reported in several other common laboratory rat strains. In contrast, the mass of the AHR in H/W rats is approximately 98 kDa, significantly smaller than the mass of receptor reported in any other rat strains. F1 offspring of a cross between L-E and H/W rats expressed both the 106- and the 98-kDa protein. There was no apparent difference in the mass of the AHR nuclear translocator protein (ARNT) between the two strains, but the hepatic concentration of ARNT was about three times as high in L-E as in H/W rats. It will be interesting to find out how the altered structure of the AHR in H/W rats is related to their remarkable resistance to the lethal effects of TCDD.

Developmental expression of two members of a new class of transcription factors: I. Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the C57BL/6N mouse embryo

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor with a basic region/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif. AhR has been sequenced and the functional domains defined and there is information on the formation of complexes with other peptides and interactions with DNA, although these areas continue to be investigated. AhR mediates many biological effects such as developmental toxicity, including induction of cleft palate and hydronephrosis. This regulatory protein is expressed in embryonic liver and has been immunohistochemically localized in cells of human and mouse secondary palate. The expression of AhR in embryonic tissues and its ability to disrupt development suggests a significant role for this protein in development. The present study examines the pattern of AhR expression in the C57BL/6N mouse embryo from gestation days (GD) 10-16, using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis. AhR mRNA was localized with 35S-RNA antisense riboprobe (cAh1 probe, 1.8 Kb amino terminal DNA). AhR protein was localized with purified monoclonal antibody (RPT-9) raised against the N-terminal peptide sequence. AhR mRNA and protein were expressed in GD 10-13 neuroepithelium, and as development progressed the levels in brain decreased. GD 10-12 embryos also showed AhR in branchial arches, heart, somites, and liver. AhR protein and mRNA in heart were highest at GD 10-11 and decreased with age. In liver, AhR mRNA and protein levels increased and nuclear localization became more pronounced with gestational age. In GD 14-16 embryos levels in liver and adrenal were highest, but AhR was present in ectoderm, bone, and muscle. AhR expression was specific for both cell type, organ/tissue, and developmental stage, suggesting that this novel ligand-activated transcriptional regulator may be important in normal embryonic development.

Identification of a benzo[a]pyrene-like binding protein involved in circulating immune complexes of patients with mammary tumors

Anti-benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)-like autoantibodies (autoAb) have been characterized in sera of patients with epithelial tumors. Circulating immune complexes (CIC) from these sera have been analysed after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) under non-denaturing conditions. Immunoblotting was performed using a monoclonal antiidiotypic antibody (Ab), internal image of conjugated B[a]P called AIB1 and anti-human immunoglobulins (Ig). An immunoreactivity was seen only with AIB1 Ab, suggesting the presence of a 'B[a]P-like' binding protein. Additional studies showed that this immunoreactivity is not associated with an 18- to 20-kDa protein previously identified in the same CIC.

Modulation of gene expression and endocrine response pathways by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related compounds

The aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor binds several different structural classes of chemicals, including halogenated aromatics, typified by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), polynuclear aromatic and heteropolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. TCDD induces expression of several genes including CYP1A1, and molecular biology studies show that the Ah receptor acts as a nuclear ligand-induced transcription factor that interacts with xenobiotic or dioxin responsive elements located in 5'-flanking regions of responsive genes. TCDD also elicits diverse toxic effects, modulates endocrine pathways and inhibits a broad spectrum of estrogen (17 beta-estradiol)-induced responses in rodents and human breast cancer cell lines. Molecular biology studies show that TCDD inhibited 17 beta-estradiol-induced cathepsin D gene expression by targeted interaction of the nuclear Ah receptor with imperfect dioxin responsive elements strategically located within the estrogen receptor-Sp1 enhancer sequence of this gene.

Molecular biology of the aromatic hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor

The aromatic hydrocarbon (AH) (dioxin) receptor was discovered almost 20 years ago and achieved notoriety as the front-line site of action of highly toxic environmental chemicals such as halogenated dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls. Increasing evidence suggests that the AH receptor plays a key role in proliferation and differentiation of cells exposed to dioxins and, perhaps, to endogenous ligands. Recent cloning of the AH receptor and its indispensable partner, the AH-receptor-nuclear-translocator protein, has opened new opportunities to determine how the AH receptor functions, how it evolved and what its multiple roles might be in normal physiology as well as in toxicology. This review by Allan Okey, David Riddick and Patricia Harper aims to provide a brief history of AH receptor research and gives a timely summary of what is known and what is not known about the structure and function of this fascinating protein.