Retinoblastoma protein reverses DNA bending by transcription factor E2F

Emerging biomarkers in head and neck cancer in the era of genomics

Head and neck cancer (HNC) broadly includes carcinomas arising from the mucosal epithelia of the head and neck region as well as various cell types of salivary glands and the thyroid. As reflected by the multiple sites and histologies of HNC, the molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of this disease vary widely. In this Review, we focus on established and emerging biomarkers that are most relevant to nasopharyngeal carcinoma and head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC), which includes primary sites in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx. Applications and limitations of currently established biomarkers are discussed along with examples of successful biomarker development. For emerging biomarkers, preclinical or retrospective data are also described in the context of recently completed comprehensive molecular analyses of HNSCC, which provide a broad genetic landscape and molecular classification beyond histology and clinical characteristics. We will highlight the ongoing effort that will see a shift from prognostic to predictive biomarker development in HNC with the goal of delivering individualized cancer therapy.

Reactivation of L1 retrotransposon by benzo(a)pyrene involves complex genetic and epigenetic regulation

Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), is an environmental pollutant present in tobacco smoke and a byproduct of fossil fuel combustion which likely contributes to the tumorigenic processes in human cancers including lung and esophageal. Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 (LINE-1) or L1 is a mobile element within the mammalian genome that propagates via a "copy-and-paste" mechanism using reverse transcriptase and RNA intermediates. L1 is strongly expressed during early embryogenesis and then silenced as cells initiate differentiation programming. Although the complex transcriptional control mechanisms of L1 are not well understood, L1 reactivation has been described in several human cancers and following exposure of mouse or human cells to BaP. In this study we investigated the molecular mechanisms and epigenetic events that regulate L1 reactivation following BaP exposure. We show that challenge of HeLa cells with BaP induces early enrichment of the transcriptionally-active chromatin markers histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 (H3K4Me3) and histone H3 acetylated at lysine 9 (H3K9Ac), and reduces association of DNA methyltransferase-1 (DNMT1) with the L1 promoter. These changes are followed by proteasome-dependent decreases in cellular DNMT1 expression and sustained reduction of cytosine methylation within the L1 promoter CpG island. Pharmacological inhibition of the proteasome signaling pathway with the inhibitor MG132 blocks degradation of DNMT1 and alters BaP-mediated histone epigenetic modifications. We conclude that genetic reactivation of L1 by BaP involves an ordered cascade of epigenetic events that begin with nucleosomal histone modifications and is completed with alterations in DNMT1 recruitment to the L1 promoter and reduced DNA methylation of CpG islands.

Proapoptotic role of novel gene-expression factors

The mechanisms that control cellular proliferation, as well as those related with programmed cell death or apoptosis, require precise regulation systems to prevent diseases such as cancer. Events related to cellular proliferation as well as those associated with apoptosis involve the regulation of gene expression carried out by three basic genetic expression regulation mechanisms: transcription, splicing of the primary transcript for mature mRNA formation, and RNA translation, a ribosomal machinery-dependent process for protein synthesis. While development of each one of these processes requires energy for recognition and assembly of a number of molecular complexes, it has been reported that an increased expression of several members of these protein complexes promotes apoptosis in distinct cell types. The question of how these factors interact with other proteins in order to incorporate themselves into the different transduction cascades and stimulate the development of programmed cell death, although nowadays actively studied, is still waiting for a clear-cut answer. This review focuses on the interactions established between different families of transcription, elongation, translation and splicing factors associated to the progression of apoptosis.

Inhibitory Effect of TIS7 on Sp1-C/EBPα Transcription Factor Module Activity

The transcription factors C/EBPalpha and Sp1 functionally interact to induce expression of specific genes during myeloid and epithelial cell differentiation. The C/EBPalpha-Sp1 transcription factor "module" binds to enhancer elements within the upstream regulatory sequences of target genes. In our previous study we identified mouse TPA inducible sequence 7 (TIS7) as a novel co-repressor in epithelial cells undergoing loss of polarity. Increased levels of TIS7 down-regulate the transcription of a specific set of genes. Using bioinformatic analysis we identified a common binding site for the C/EBPalpha-Spl transcription factor module within the upstream regulatory regions of TIS7-regulated genes. The inhibitory effect of TIS7 on C/EBPalpha-Sp1-mediated transcription was confirmed by reporter assays. Our data showed that the TIS7 effect was mediated through specific interference with Sp1 transcriptional activity. Furthermore, TIS7 prevented formation of a complex between Sp1 protein and its consensus DNA binding site. Data presented here further specify the mechanism of action of the transcriptional co-repressor TIS7 as well as document the strength of a bioinformatic approach for the prediction and analysis of transcription factor modules.

Differences in stability of repressor complexes at promoters underlie distinct roles for Rb family members

Oncogenic transformation of cells can induce the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p16, which leads to hypophosphorylation and activation of retinoblastoma (Rb). Rb is capable of causing permanent growth arrest, which may underlie its role as a tumor suppressor. We show that repression by Rb at E2F target gene promoters involves the establishment of a stable repressor complex that is not displaced by the overexpression of E2F-1. Rather than displacing Rb, excess E2F-1 instead recruits more Rb, leading to direct transcriptional repression. In contrast, the Rb family members, p130 and p107, which have not been demonstrated to be tumor suppressors, bind preferentially to target promoters in the absence of growth factors and in proliferating cells, respectively, and these repressor complexes are displaceable by E2F-1. Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), which interacts with Rb, is associated with these distinct repressor complexes and follows a similar pattern of stability/displaceability. Efficient growth arrest by p16/Rb is dependent on histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, which provides a binding site for HP1. We propose that these differences in the stability of repressor complexes at promoters may, in part, underlie the different roles of Rb vs p130 and p107 in cell cycle regulation and tumor suppression.

Transcription factor E2F-1 acts as a growth-promoting factor and is associated with adverse prognosis in non-small cell lung carcinomas

Numerous upstream stimulatory and inhibitory signals converge to the pRb/E2F pathway, which governs cell-cycle progression, but the information concerning alterations of E2F-1 in primary malignancies is very limited. Several in vitro studies report that E2F-1 can act either as an oncoprotein or as a tumour suppressor protein. In view of this dichotomy in its functions and its critical role in cell cycle control, this study examined the following four aspects of E2F-1 in a panel of 87 non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), previously analysed for defects in the pRb-p53-MDM2 network: firstly, the status of E2F-1 at the protein, mRNA and DNA levels; secondly, its relationship with the kinetic parameters and genomic instability of the tumours; thirdly, its association with the status of its transcriptional co-activator CBP, downstream target PCNA and main cell cycle regulatory and E2F-1-interacting molecules pRb, p53 and MDM2; and fourthly, its impact on clinical outcome. The protein levels of E2F-1 and its co-activator CBP were significantly higher in the tumour area than in the corresponding normal epithelium (p<0.001). E2F-1 overexpression was associated with increased E2F-1 mRNA levels in 82% of the cases examined. The latter finding, along with the low frequency of E2F-1 gene amplification observed (9%), suggests that the main mechanism of E2F-1 protein overexpression in NSCLCs is deregulation at the transcriptional level. Mutational analysis revealed only one sample with asomatic mutation at codon 371 (Glu-->Asp) and one carrying a polymorphism at codon 393 (Gly-->Ser). Carcinomas with increased E2F-1 positivity demonstrated a significant increase in their growth indexes (r=0.402, p=0.001) and were associated with adverse prognosis (p=0.033 by Cox regression analysis). The main determinant of the positive association with growth was the parallel increase between E2F-1 staining and proliferation (r=0.746, p<0.001), whereas apoptosis was not influenced by the status of E2F-1. Moreover, correlation with the status of the pRb-p53-MDM2 network showed that the cases with aberrant pRb expression displayed significantly higher E2F-1 indexes (p=0.033), while a similar association was noticed in the group of carcinomas with deregulation of the p53-MDM2 feedback loop. In conclusion, the results suggest that E2F-1 overexpression may contribute to the development of NSCLCs by promoting proliferation and provide evidence that this role is further enhanced in a genetic background with deregulated pRb-p53-MDM2 circuitry.

Functions of the retinoblastoma protein

The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) can both positively and negatively regulate transcription. The former correlates with its ability to promote differentiation and the latter with its ability to regulate entry into S-phase. pRB negatively regulates transcription by forming complexes with members of the E2F transcription factor family. These complexes, when bound to E2F sites within certain target genes, actively repress transcription through a variety of mechanisms including physical interaction with adjacent transcriptional activation domains and recruitment of proteins that directly, or indirectly, lead to histone deacetylation. pRB function is, in turn, modulated by phosphorylation mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases. Emerging data suggest that combinatorial control of pRB function may be achieved through the use of different phosphoacceptor sites, different cyclin/cdk docking sites, and different cyclin/cdk complexes. The untimely activation of E2F responsive genes can induce apoptosis. This comes about at least partly through the induction of ARF, which leads to the stabilization and activation of p53. BioEssays 1999;21:950-958.

Regulation of E2F: a family of transcription factors involved in proliferation control

Members of the E2F family of transcription factors are key participants in orchestration of the cell cycle, cell growth arrest and apoptosis. Therefore, an understanding of the regulation of E2F activity is essential for an understanding of the control of cellular proliferation. E2F activity is regulated by the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors and by multiple other mechanisms. This review will describe our current knowledge of these mechanisms which together constitute a highly complex network by which the cell cycle and cellular proliferation can be controlled.

Transcriptional repression of the E2F-1 gene by interferon-alpha is mediated through induction of E2F-4/pRB and E2F-4/p130 complexes

E2F is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of one of five E2F subunits (E2F-1 to E2F-5) and a DP subunit. E2F regulates the expression of several growth-promoting genes, and thus, can be a target of antiproliferative action of interferons (IFNs). In this study, we investigated the mechanisms whereby IFN-alpha suppresses transcription of the E2F-1 gene. Transfection studies revealed that E2F-1 promoter was functionally divided into two parts: upstream activation sequences (UAS) and a downstream negative-regulatory element (E2F-binding sites). When cells were proliferating, transcription of the E2F-1 gene was primarily driven by the UAS, while E2F sites were not involved in activation. IFN-alpha markedly reduced E2F-1 promoter activity, but introduction of non-binding mutation at the E2F sites completely abrogated the inhibition. Free E2F4 was found to be the predominant species bound to the E2F sites in proliferating cells. IFN-alpha induced upregulation of E2F-4 along with dephosphorylation of pRB and p130, which resulted in the formation of E2F-4/pRB and E2F-4/p130 complexes on the E2F-1 promoter. These complexes function as transcriptional repressors to inhibit E2F-1 mRNA expression. Our findings indicate that E2F-4 is a critical regulator of E2F-1, which offer an excellent paradigm for understanding functional diversity within the E2F family.

Negative control elements of the cell cycle in human tumors

The retinoblastoma protein and p53 are both cell-cycle regulators and are, directly or indirectly, inactivated in the majority of human tumors. Recent studies have provided new mechanistic insights into how these proteins regulate cell growth in response to various intracellular and extracellular signals.

Regulation of expression and activity of distinct pRB, E2F, D-type cyclin, and CKI family members during terminal differentiation of P19 cells

The cell cycle regulatory proteins, which include cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks), cdk inhibitors (CKIs), cyclins, and the pRB, and E2F families of proteins, constitute a network of interacting factors which govern exit from or passage through the mammalian cell cycle. While the proteins within these families have similar structural characteristics, each family member exhibits distinct expression patterns during embryogenesis and distinct biological activities. In order to begin to understand the tissue-specific roles of these interacting factors, we determined the expression pattern and activity of the pRB, E2F, cyclin, cdk, and CKI families of cell cycle regulatory proteins during retinoic acid-induced (neuronal pathway) and DMSO-induced (cardiac muscle pathway) differentiation of the pluripotent murine embryonal carcinoma cell line, P19. We demonstrate here that P19 terminal differentiation causes lineage-specific changes in the expression and activity of distinct members of the E2F, pRB, cyclin, and CKI families. Furthermore, dynamic changes in the activities of these cell cycle regulatory proteins occur through several overlapping mechanisms, culminating in repression of DNA-binding activity by all of the E2F family members as cells terminally differentiate.

The transcription factor E2F-1 in SV40 T antigen-induced cerebellar Purkinje cell degeneration

Transgenic targeting of SV40 large T antigen (Tag) expression to murine cerebellar Purkinje cells induces these normally postmitotic neurons to undergo DNA synthesis and apoptosis. It has been proposed that these effects of Tag are due to the binding of Tag to pRb, which leads to the release and activation of the transcription factor E2F. Here it is reported that E2F and CDC2, the protein product of a gene regulated by E2F, were detectable in the Purkinje cell nuclei of Tag expressing transgenic animals. To directly test whether E2F-1 is part of the mechanism of Tag-induced Purkinje cell degeneration, transgenic mice that overexpress E2F-1 specifically in cerebellar Purkinje cells were generated. Although E2F-1 itself did not affect Purkinje cells, it did accelerate Tag-induced ataxia and Purkinje cell loss, suggesting that E2F-1 can contribute to the mechanism of Tag-induced Purkinje cell degeneration.

DNA bending is induced by binding of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2 heterodimer to its response element in the murine lipoprotein lipase promoter

The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma 2 (PPAR gamma 2) is a critical transcriptional regulator of adipogenesis. Lipoprotein lipase is one of the earliest genes induced following exposure of pre-adipocytes to PPAR gamma 2 ligands such as the thiazolidinediones. A unique PPAR gamma 2 DNA recognition element was mapped to the region between -171 to -149 bp of the murine LPL promoter, based on transfection analysis of deletion constructs and gel retention assays using bacterially expressed, affinity purified recombinant proteins. Circular permutation analysis determined that binding of the PPAR gamma 2/retinoic acid X receptor (RXR) heterodimer to its LPL promoter recognition element induced DNA bending at an angle of approximately 46 degrees. Parallel studies using an optimal PPAR recognition element obtained a comparable bending angle of 56 degrees. This is the first demonstration that binding of a PPAR protein to its recognition element causes a distortion of the DNA configuration. It indicates that PPAR gamma 2 utilizes a common mechanism shared by other nuclear hormone receptor proteins reported to induce bending at their DNA binding sites.

High-affinity binding of the cell cycle-regulated transcription factors E2F1 and E2F4 to benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-DNA adducts

Previous studies indicated that DNA adducts formed by a carcinogenic diol epoxide, 7r,8t-dihydroxy-9t, 10t-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (BPDE), can increase the affinity of the transcription factor Sp1 for DNA sequences that are not normally specific binding sites. It was suggested that adduct-induced bends in the DNA were responsible for this behavior. The cell cycle-regulated transcription factor E2F is also known to bend DNA upon binding. When partially purified E2F was tested in a gel mobility-shift assay, binding to a target DNA containing two consensus E2F-binding sites was enhanced by prior modification of the DNA with BPDE. Recombinant human E2F1, E2F4, and DP1 fusion proteins were affinity purified from bacteria expressing these genes. A combination of either E2F1 or E2F4 with their dimerization partner, DP1, gave preparations that exhibited binding to the E2F site-containing DNA fragment. In both cases, the proteins exhibited much higher apparent affinity for BPDE-modified DNA than for unmodified DNA. In addition, BPDE-modified DNA was a better competitor for the binding than unmodified DNA. Heterologous DNA that contained no consensus E2F binding motifs also competed well for E2F binding when modified with BPDE. In contrast, transcription factor that does not bend DNA appreciably (GAL4) did not show enhanced affinity for BPDE-modified DNA. These findings suggest that numerous transcription factors that bend DNA may bind with anomalously high affinity to sequences that contain carcinogen-DNA adducts.

Structural and functional analyses of DNA bending induced by Sp1 family transcription factors

DNA bending induced by eukaryotic transcription factors may play a direct role in the activation of transcription by bringing together factors bound at non-adjacent sites or facilitate binding of factors involved in the formation of an initiation complex. The ubiquitously expressed zinc-finger transcription factor Sp1 is involved in the regulation of a variety of viral and cellular genes. During the past few years proteins homologous to Sp1 have been described constituting a family of Sp1 transcription factors. We have used gel electrophoretic methods to analyse the extent, location and direction of the DNA bend induced by four different Sp1 family proteins upon binding to a consensus GC box. We found that the Sp1 family proteins induce an asymmetric bend in DNA directed towards the major groove, with a bend centre displaced towards the 3' end of the GC box. The zinc-finger domain was alone responsible for introducing this distortion. The magnitude of the induced bend varied between the different proteins. Construction of a hybrid protein and mutation of the 3' end of the GC box indicated that zinc finger 1 is important both for the magnitude of the bend angle, location of the bend centre and the binding affinity. Transactivation studies of a Sp1-dependent promoter revealed that a 5 bp insertion between the TATA box and the GC box, or inversion of the GC box significantly reduced the promoter activity, indicating that protein-induced bending could be important for promoter activity. However, no stimulatory effect could be observed in cotransfections with the DNA binding domain of Sp1 in Drosophila SL-2 cells, suggesting that the bending activity alone is not sufficient for transactivation.

Formation and processing of UV photoproducts: effects of DNA sequence and chromatin environment

Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts are the two major classes of lesions produced in DNA by UVB and UVC irradiation. Their distribution along genes is nucleotide sequence-dependent. In vivo, the frequency of these lesions at specific sites is modulated by nucleosomes and other DNA binding proteins. Repair of UV photoproducts is dependent on the transcriptional status of the sequences to be repaired and on the chromatin environment. The formation of DNA photolesions by UV light is responsible for the induction of mutations and the development of skin cancer. To understand the mechanisms of UV mutagenesis, it is important to know how these lesions are formed, by which cellular pathways they are repaired and how they are dealt with by DNA polymerases.

DNA bending is induced by binding of the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain and progesterone receptors to their response element

Circular permutation analysis was used to determine the degree of DNA bending induced by binding of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) DNA binding domain (DBD), the human progesterone receptor (PR) DBD, PR-A:A and PR-B:B homodimers, and PR-A:B heterodimers to the glucocorticoid response element/progesterone response element (GRE/PRE). The bending angles induced by the GR DBD and the PR DBD were approximately 28 degrees and 25 degrees, respectively. The PR-B:B and PR-A:A homodimers and the PR-A:B heterodimers all induced similar DNA bending angles of 72-77 degrees. The substantially greater DNA bend induced by full-length PR compared to the PR DBD indicates that sequences outside the classic zinc finger DNA binding domain may play an important role in the interaction of PR with the GRE/PRE. Because PR-A:A and PR-B:B homodimers and the PR-A:B heterodimers induce similar DNA bends, the different abilities of the PR-A and PR-B isoforms to activate transcription are not due to differences in their abilities to distort DNA structure.

Inhibition of transcription factor binding by ultraviolet-induced pyrimidine dimers

The formation of DNA photoproducts by ultraviolet (UV) light is responsible for the induction of mutations and the development of skin cancer. Cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (pyrimidine dimers) are the most frequent lesions produced in DNA by UV irradiation. Besides being mutagenic, pyrimidine dimers may interfere with other important DNA-dependent processes. To analyze the effects of pyrimidine dimers on the ability of DNA sequences to be recognized by trans-acting factors, we have incorporated site-specific T-T dimers into oligonucleotides containing the recognition sequences of the sequence-specific transcription factors E2F, NF-Y, AP-1, NF kappa B, and p53. In each case, presence of the photodimer strongly inhibited binding of the respective transcription factor complex. Reduction of binding varied between 11- and 60-fold. The results indicate that the most common UV-induced DNA lesion can interfere severely with binding of several important cell cycle regulatory and DNA damage responsive transcription factors. We suggest that inhibition of transcription factor binding may be a major biological effect of UV radiation since promoter regions are known to be repaired inefficiently and since UV damage can deregulate the function of a large number of different factors.

RB [corrected] as a modulator of transcription

pRB interacts with a number of transcription factors and can both directly and indirectly modulate transcriptional activity. Growth suppression by pRB is tightly linked to its ability to form complexes with E2F which are capable of repressing transcription of certain genes required for S phase. The ability of pRB to enhance the activity of several non-E2F transcription factors might suggest a mechanism by which pRB could coordinately regulate sets of genes at or near the restriction point. Specifically, complexes consisting of underphosphorylated pRB and E2F, by virtue of transcriptional repression of promoters containing E2F sites, would act to block entry into S phase. At the same time, distinct complexes of underphosphorylated pRB and transcription factors such as the glucocorticoid receptor, ATF-2, or MyoD, might lead to an increase in the transcription of genes required for differentiation or for additional growth inhibitory functions (e.g. TGF-beta 1). Changes in the activities of various cyclin-dependent kinase complexes would lead to phosphorylation of pRB and thus coordinate a release of S phase genes from repression with a loss of activation of differentiation genes. While this model is speculative, the role of pRB as a transcriptional modulator, as well as its interactions with cell-cycle regulatory kinases, places it in a position to integrate extracellular and intracellular growth signals and to transduce those signals into changes in gene transcription which ultimately influence cell growth and differentiation.

Cis-elements involved in differential expression of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase alpha 2 subunit gene in muscle differentiation

The mRNA of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase alpha 2 subunit gene (Atpla2) increases during myogenesis in rat following birth. To investigate the mechanism of the transcriptional regulation underlying this process, we examined the promoter activity of Atpla2 by transient transfection assays in myocyte differentiation, using C2C12 murine skeletal myoblast cell line. The promoter activity was increased about 5-fold in the differentiated cells, comparing with that in the growing cells. By analyses of 5'-deletion mutations of the gene, the responsible elements were localized in the region between -108 and +60. We identified a binding factor that exists only in the nuclear extract from the growing cells but not in the extract from the differentiated cells with a probe DNA fragment from +20 to +50 by gel retardation assays. The element to which the factor binds can mediate the inhibition of alpha 2 gene expression in the growing C2C12 cells but not in the differentiated cells. Finally we revealed protein occupancy in this region in the growing cells by in vivo footprinting. We propose a model that the increased expression of Atpla2 during muscle differentiation is mediated by the disappearance of a negative factor.

Introduction to the E2F family: protein structure and gene regulation

E2F is a heterodimer composed of two partners, such as E2F1 and DP1. Although E2F1 can bind DNA as a homodimer and increase promoter activity, optimal DNA-binding and transcriptional activity occurs in the heterodimeric form. A model (Fig. 3) for the involvement of E2F activity in cell growth control that incorporates viral oncoproteins, positive regulators of cell growth (cyclins) and negative regulators of cell growth (tumor suppressor proteins) can now be advanced. Each aspect of this model is addressed in subsequent chapters of this book. It is likely that binding of growth-suppressing proteins, such as Rb, can inhibit the transactivation potential of E2F1, either by blocking the interaction of E2F1 with a separate component of the transcription complex or by bringing a repressor domain to the transcription complex (Flemington et al. 1993; Helin et al. 1993; Weintraub et al. 1992; Zamanian and La Thangue 1993; Zhu et al. 1993). Phosphorylation or sequestration of Rb by viral oncoproteins can free E2F. The influence of viral oncoproteins on E2F activity and the regulation of the different E2F complexes is the focus of the contributions by Cobrinik and by Cress and Nevens. The interaction of the free E2F induces a bend in the DNA that may also play a role in transactivation, perhaps by bringing proteins (such as an Sp1 or CCAAT family member) separated by distance on the promoter DNA into contact (Huber et al. 1994). Because E2F target genes encode proteins critical for cell growth, deregulation of E2F activity can have severe consequences, such as apoptosis or uncontrolled proliferation. The effect of altered expression of E2F activity on the cell cycle and on tumorigenicity is the focus of the contribution by Adams and Kaelin. Finally, a comparison of E2F to the genetically well-characterized factors that regulate G1/S phase transcription in yeast is the subject of the chapter by Breeden. This volume concludes with Farnham's summary of the rapid gains in knowledge concerning the E2F gene family that have been made in the past several years and provides a series of questions and lines of investigation that will be the focus of future studies.

An inverted repeat motif stabilizes binding of E2F and enhances transcription of the dihydrofolate reductase gene

An overlapping inverted repeat sequence that binds the eukaryotic transcription factor E2F is 100% conserved near the major transcription start sites in the promoters of three mammalian genes encoding dihydrofolate reductase, and is also found in the promoters of several other important cellular and viral genes. This element, 5'-TTTCGCGCCAAA-3', is comprised of two overlapping, oppositely oriented sites which match the consensus E2F site (5'-TTT(C/G)(C/G)CGC-3'). Recent work has shown that E2F binding activity is composed of at least six related cellular polypeptides which are capable of forming DNA-binding homo- and heterodimers. We have investigated the binding of cellular E2F activity and of homo- and heterodimers of cloned E2F proteins to the inverted repeat E2F element. We have demonstrated that mutations in this element that abolish its inverted repeat nature, while preserving a single consensus E2F site, significantly decrease the binding stability of all of the forms of E2F tested. The rate of association of E2F-1/DP-1 heterodimers with the inverted repeat wild type site was not significantly different from those with the two single site mutated probes. Furthermore, the mutations decrease in vitro transcription and transient reporter gene expression 2-5-fold, an effect equivalent to that of abolishing E2F binding altogether. These data suggest a functional role that may explain the conservation of inverted repeat E2F elements among the DHFR promoters and several other cellular and viral promoters.

Disruption of retinoblastoma protein function by coexpression of its C pocket fragment

The growth suppression function of the retinoblastoma protein (RB) is mediated by its interaction with a variety of cellular proteins. RB contains at least two protein-binding pockets: the large A/B pocket, which interacts with E2F and the D-type cyclins, and the C pocket, which interacts with the nuclear c-Abl tyrosine kinase. The large A/B pocket and the C pocket are shown here to be functionally distinct and can be occupied simultaneously. A complex containing E2F, RB, and c-Abl is detected in vivo and can be assembled in vitro. We propose that the biological activity of RB not only depends on the inhibition of its targets but also on its ability to properly assemble specific protein complexes. Consistent with this hypothesis, a fragment of RB, SE delta, containing only the C pocket is shown to act as a dominant-negative inhibitor of RB function. SE delta does not have growth inhibitory activity of its own. When coexpressed with full-length RB, SE delta does not disrupt the RB-E2F or RB-D2 complexes nor does it affect the expression, phosphorylation, or nuclear tethering of the full-length RB. SE delta does compete with RB for binding to c-Abl and is fully capable of inhibiting the c-Abl tyrosine kinase. Thus, SE delta can inactivate RB while maintaining the inhibition of E2F and c-Abl. These results suggest that the inhibition of RB-binding proteins is not sufficient to suppress cell growth and that the assembly of RB-mediated protein complexes is also important for the promotion of cell-cycle arrest.