Phosphorylation of parathyroid hormone by human and bovine parathyroid glands

Tutorial review for peptide assays: An ounce of pre-analytics is worth a pound of cure

The recent increase in peptidomimetic-based medications and the growing interest in peptide hormones has brought new attention to the quantification of peptides for diagnostic purposes. Indeed, the circulating concentrations of peptide hormones in the blood provide a snapshot of the state of the body and could eventually lead to detecting a particular health condition. Although extremely useful, the quantification of such molecules, preferably by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, might be quite tricky. First, peptides are subjected to hydrolysis, oxidation, and other post-translational modifications, and, most importantly, they are substrates of specific and nonspecific proteases in biological matrixes. All these events might continue after sampling, changing the peptide hormone concentrations. Second, because they include positively and negatively charged groups and hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues, they interact with their environment; these interactions might lead to a local change in the measured concentrations. A phenomenon such as nonspecific adsorption to lab glassware or materials has often a tremendous effect on the concentration and needs to be controlled with particular care. Finally, the circulating levels of peptides might be low (pico- or femtomolar range), increasing the impact of the aforementioned effects and inducing the need for highly sensitive instruments and well-optimized methods. Thus, despite the extreme diversity of these peptides and their matrixes, there is a common challenge for all the assays: the need to keep concentrations unchanged from sampling to analysis. While significant efforts are often placed on optimizing the analysis, few studies consider in depth the impact of pre-analytical steps on the results. By working through practical examples, this solution-oriented tutorial review addresses typical pre-analytical challenges encountered during the development of a peptide assay from the standpoint of a clinical laboratory. We provide tips and tricks to avoid pitfalls as well as strategies to guide all new developments. Our ultimate goal is to increase pre-analytical awareness to ensure that newly developed peptide assays produce robust and accurate results.

Inactivation of parathyroid hormone: perspectives of drug discovery to combating hyperparathyroidism

Hormonal coordination is tightly regulated within the human body and thus regulates human physiology. The parathyroid hormone (PTH), a member of the endocrine system, regulates the calcium and phosphate level within the human body. Under non-physiological conditions, PTH levels get upregulated (hyperparathyroidism) or downregulated (hypoparathyroidism) due to external or internal factors. In the case of hyperparathyroidism, elevated PTH stimulates cellular receptors present in the bones, kidneys, and intestines to increase the blood calcium level, leading to calcium deposition. This eventually causes various symptoms including kidney stones. Currently, there is no known medication that directly targets PTH in order to suppress its function. Therefore, it is of great interest to find novel small molecules or any other means that can modulate PTH function. The molecular signaling of PTH starts by binding of its N-terminus to the G-protein coupled PTH1/2 receptor. Therefore, any intervention that affects the N-terminus of PTH could be a lead candidate for treating hyperparathyroidism. As a proof-of-concept, there are various possibilities to inhibit molecular PTH function by (i) a small molecule, (ii) N-terminal PTH phosphorylation, (iii) fibril formation and (iv) residue-specific mutations. These modifications put PTH into an inactive state, which will be discussed in detail in this review article. We anticipate that exploring small molecules or other means that affect the N-terminus of PTH could be lead candidates in combating hyperparathyroidism.

Clinical Guidelines and PTH Measurement: Does Assay Generation Matter?

PTH is an important regulator of calcium and phosphate homeostasis and bone remodeling. It is metabolized into PTH fragments, which are measured to a different extent by PTH assays of different generations because of differences in fragments recognized and lack of assay standardization. PTH is measured in the workup of several conditions, and clinical guidelines provide recommendations concerning these measurements. This review provides an overview of the impact of differences between PTH assays, applying distinct clinical guidelines for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism and perioperative use of PTH measurements. Guidelines deal with PTH measurement in different ways, recommending either trend monitoring, the use of a fold increase of the upper reference limit, or an absolute PTH cutoff value. For classic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), the type of PTH assay used will not affect diagnosis or management because the precise concentration of PTH is less relevant. In chronic kidney disease, the guideline recommends treating secondary hyperparathyroidism above a twofold to ninefold PTH increase, which will result in different clinical decisions depending on the assay used. For patients after bariatric surgery, guidelines state absolute cutoff values for PTH, but the impact of different generation assays is unknown because direct comparison of PTH assays has never been performed. During parathyroid surgery, PTH measurements with a third-generation assay reflect treatment success more rapidly than second-generation assays. Increased awareness among clinicians regarding the complexity of PTH measurements is warranted because it can affect clinical decisions.

In-Cell NMR: Analysis of Protein-Small Molecule Interactions, Metabolic Processes, and Protein Phosphorylation

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy enables the non-invasive observation of biochemical processes, in living cells, at comparably high spectral and temporal resolution. Preferably, means of increasing the detection limit of this powerful analytical method need to be applied when observing cellular processes under physiological conditions, due to the low sensitivity inherent to the technique. In this review, a brief introduction to in-cell NMR, protein–small molecule interactions, posttranslational phosphorylation, and hyperpolarization NMR methods, used for the study of metabolites in cellulo, are presented. Recent examples of method development in all three fields are conceptually highlighted, and an outlook into future perspectives of this emerging area of NMR research is given.

Reversed whole PTH/intact PTH ratio as an indicator of marked parathyroid enlargement: five case studies and a literature review

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels detected by intact PTH assays are generally higher than those detected by the whole PTH assay because the latter does not detect non-(1–84) PTH fragments, mainly PTH (7–84). Rare exceptions to this rule have been reported in patients with severe primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism and parathyroid carcinoma. Overproduction of an N-form of PTH other than PTH (1–84) has been observed in the sera of these patients. We report five additional cases with the reversed whole PTH/intact PTH ratio associated with severe hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients. Three patients demonstrated enlargement of a single hypervascular gland, whereas the other two had undergone surgical parathyroidectomy and later showed recurrent hyperparathyroidism due to progressive autograft hyperplasia. In the case of a single enlarged gland, the pathological pattern and heterogeneous expression of parathyroid adenomatosis 1/cyclin D1 suggested it to be a single nodule of uraemic hyperparathyroidism rather than sporadic primary adenoma. These cases suggested that the reversed whole PTH/intact PTH ratio could be an indicator of marked parathyroid enlargement. Further studies are required to elucidate the clinical significance of the reversed whole PTH/intact PTH ratio in haemodialysis patients.

N-terminal phosphorylation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) abolishes its receptor activity

The parathyroid hormone (PTH) is an 84-residue peptide, which regulates the blood Ca(2+) level via GPCR binding and subsequent activation of intracellular signaling cascades. PTH is posttranslationally phosphorylated in the parathyroid glands; however, the functional significance of this processes is not well characterized. In the present study, mass spectrometric analysis revealed three sites of phosphorylation, and NMR spectroscopy assigned Ser1, Ser3, and Ser17 as modified sites. These sites are located at the N-terminus of the hormone, which is important for receptor recognition and activation. NMR shows further that the three phosphate groups remotely disturb the α-helical propensity up to Ala36. An intracellular cAMP accumulation assay elucidated the biological significance of this phosphorylation because it ablated the PTH-mediated signaling. Our studies thus shed light on functional implications of phosphorylation at native PTH as an additional level of regulation.

Acute and chronic regulation of circulating PTH: significance in health and in disease

Circulating human parathyroid hormone (PTH) is immunoheterogenous. It is composed of 80% carboxyl-terminal (C) fragments and of 20% PTH(1-84). This composition contrasts with the biological activity of the hormone, which is only related to PTH(1-84), creating a paradox between circulating PTH composition and PTH bioactivity. PTH molecular forms are either secreted by the parathyroid glands or generated by the peripheral metabolism of PTH(1-84) in the liver. The kidney has a major role in the disposal of C-PTH fragments. Secretion of PTH molecular forms by the parathyroid glands is highly regulated under a variety of clinical conditions, suggesting that C-PTH fragments could exert some biological effects of their own. Recent data suggest that C-PTH fragments can exert biological actions opposite to those of PTH(1-84) by acting on a C-PTH receptor not yet cloned. They can decrease calcium concentration, phosphate excretion, bone resorption and 1,25(OH)₂ synthesis. The clinical implications of this new concept are reviewed.

Nontruncated amino-terminal parathyroid hormone overproduction in two patients with parathyroid carcinoma: a possible link to HRPT2 gene inactivation

OBJECTIVE

Some patients with parathyroid carcinoma present with an over-production of nontruncated amino-terminal (NT-N) parathyroid hormone (PTH), a post-transcriptionally modified form of PTH(1-84). This is usually picked up on an elevated whole (W) PTH (third-generation)/total (T) (second-generation) PTH assay ratio (N > 0·8).

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Two parathyroid cancer patients with several episodes of hypercalcaemia and multiple surgeries are described. In both patients, W-PTH, T-PTH and circulating PTH molecular forms separated by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) were measured with the same assays. qPCR was used to study HRPT2 gene mutation.

RESULTS

The first patient had total calcium of 3·8 and 3·22 mmol/l before the fourth and fifth surgeries, and third/second-generation PTH ratios of 2·95 and 3·6, respectively. After the fourth surgery, the ratio remained normal for 1 year and increased progressively to 3·6 over 15 months. This preceded hypercalcaemia by 6 months. The ratio became normal after the fifth surgery. HPLC analysis disclosed an over-expression of NT-N PTH to 82·2% (N < 10%) relative to hPTH(1-84) before the fifth surgery. A deletion of all the tested exons of the HRPT2 gene was identified. In the second patient, W-PTH/T-PTH ratio was 0·89 when serum calcium was 3·3 mmol/l. NT-N PTH was also over-expressed at 51·9%. An inactivating mutation of the HRPT2 gene was also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This may suggest that a progressive rise in third/second-generation ratio may have possible clinical utility to monitor parathyroid cancer recurrence. A possible association between NT-N PTH overproduction and HRPT2 gene inactivation is also suggested.

High third generation/second generation PTH ratio in a patient with parathyroid carcinoma: clinical utility of third generation/second generation PTH ratio in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) is caused by parathyroid adenomas or hyperplasia, and occasionally by parathyroid carcinoma. Recently a high third generation/second generation PTH ratio has been observed in some patients with parathyroid carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report the case of a 60-year old woman who was presented a fourth episode of PTH-related hypercalcaemia due to a parathyroid carcinoma. Serum PTH levels were measured using a second generation assay and a third generation assay before, 4 and 7 months after the fourth surgery. Then, PTH levels were measured in 294 osteoporotic normocalcaemic patients as well as in 30 consecutive PHP patients.

RESULTS

Before surgery of the patient with parathyroid carcinoma, second generation PTH was 229 pg/ml, third generation PTH was 675 pg/ml and third generation/second generation PTH ratio was 2.95. Four and 7 months after surgery the third generation/second generation PTH ratio was 0.70 and 0.66, respectively. All osteoporotic patients had a normal third generation/second generation PTH ratio (0.585 +/- 0.118) whereas only one patient (3.3%) with PHP had a third generation/second generation PTH ratio > 1 (1.54).

CONCLUSION

A high third generation/second generation PTH ratio could be observed in patients with parathyroid carcinoma, is uncommon in benign PHP and is absent in osteoporotic patients without PHP. Therefore, PTH level can be measured using second and third generation assays in some PHP patients, and a specific surgical protocol for possible parathyroid carcinoma could be discussed in patients with a high third generation/second generation PTH ratio.

Circulating PTH molecular forms: What we know and what we don't

Circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) molecular forms have been identified by three generations of PTH assays after gel chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography fractionation of serum. Carboxyl-terminal (C) fragments missing the amino-terminal (N) structure of PTH(1-84) were identified first. They represent 80% of circulating PTH in normal individuals and up to 95% in renal failure patients. They are regulated by calcium (Ca) slightly differently than PTH(1-84), occurring in a relatively smaller proportion relative to the latter in hypocalcemia but in a much larger proportion in hypercalcemia. Synthetic C-PTH fragments do not bind to the PTH/PTHrP type I receptor and are not implicated in the classical biological effect of PTH(1-84). They bind to a different C-PTH receptor and exert biological actions on bone that are opposite to those of PTH(1-84). The integrity of the distal C-structure appears to be important for these biological effects, and it is uncertain if all C-PTH fragments are intact up to position 84. A second category of C-PTH fragment has a partially preserved N-structure. They are called non-(1-84) PTH or N-truncated fragments. They react in Intact (I)-PTH assays but not in PTH assays with a 1-4 epitope. They are acutely regulated by Ca(2+) concentration. They also exert similar hypocalcemic and antiresorptive effects but have 10-fold greater affinity for the C-PTH receptor compared to other C-PTH fragments. Even if they represent only 10% of all C-PTH fragments, they could be as relevant biologically. An N form of PTH other than PTH(1-84) has been identified in the circulation. It reacts very well in PTH assays with a 1-4 epitope but poorly in I-PTH assay with a 12-18 epitope. It is oversecreted in severe primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism and in parathyroid cancers. Its biological activity is still unknown. Overall, these studies suggest that PTH(1-84) and C-PTH fragments are regulated differently to exert opposite biological effects on bone via two different receptors. This may serve to control bone turnover and Ca concentration more efficiently.

Practical considerations in PTH testing

New knowledge concerning PTH biology have accumulated during the past few years. The finding that the so-called "intact" PTH assays measure a "non-1-84" PTH fragment in addition to full-length PTH has led to the development of new assays. These new assays, which were initially thought to measure 1-84 PTH only, have been shown to recognize also another PTH species called "amino-PTH". As the various names given to the different assay methods are highly confusing, there is a need for a simplified nomenclature. A simple way would be to identify the older "intact" PTH assays as second-generation assays and the new assays (Whole, CAP, BioIntact) as third-generation assays. Although of considerable potential interest for the comprehension of PTH physiology, the third-generation PTH assays have not yet proved to be superior to the second-generation assays in clinical practice. There is thus currently no recommendation to switch from the second-generation to the third-generation assays in clinical practice, or to use a ratio derived from the concommitent measurement of PTH with both assay-generation. Because second- and third-generation PTH assays are usually highly correlated, significant differences in the clinical information provided by these methods are unlikely. However, our opinion is that more definitive bone biopsy studies in dialyzed patients selected according to their bone- and calcium-related treatment are still needed to reach a consensus. Finally, we have proposed that PTH reference values should be established in healthy subjects with a normal vitamin D status. This supposes that 25OHD is measured in the reference population beforehand, and that the subjects with vitamin D insufficiency are eliminated from the reference group. Although more complicated than the usual way to establish normative data, we have shown that it decreases the upper limit of normal by 25-35%, enhancing thus the diagnostic sensitivity for hyperparathyroidism without a decrease in specificity.

Amino-terminal form of parathyroid hormone (PTH) with immunologic similarities to hPTH(1-84) is overproduced in primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

To separate non-(1-84)parathyroid hormone [non-(1-84)PTH] from PTH(1-84), we developed new HPLC gradients and observed that the peak coeluting with hPTH(1-84) could be separated into two entities recognized by a cyclase-activating PTH (CA-PTH) assay that reacts with the first four amino acids of the PTH structure.

METHODS

Sera from six healthy individuals and five patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, and eight pools of sera from patients in renal failure were fractionated by HPLC. A total (T)-PTH assay reacting with the (15-20) region, the CA-PTH assay, and a COOH-terminal (C)-PTH assay with a (65-84) structure requirement were used to measure basal and fractionated PTH values.

RESULTS

T-PTH was higher than CA-PTH in all healthy controls [mean (SD), 3.13 (0.37) vs 2.29 (0.33) pmol/L; P <0.01] and in renal failure patients [47 (35.1) vs 33.4 (26.1) pmol/L; P <0.01]. By contrast, CA-PTH concentrations were similar to or higher than T-PTH in three of five patients with primary hyperparathyroidism [25.7 (26.1) vs 23.1 (24.2) pmol/L; not significant]. The CA-PTH assay reacted with the hPTH(1-84) peak and with a minor peak different from the non-(1-84) peak recognized by the T-PTH assay. This minor peak was not recognized by the T-PTH assay. It represented 8 (2)% of CA-PTH in controls, 25 (23)% in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, and 22 (7)% in renal failure patients, assuming equimolar reactivity to hPTH(1-84) in the CA-PTH assay. It was not oxidized hPTH(1-84), which migrated differently on HPLC and reacted similarly in the CA and T-PTH assays.

CONCLUSIONS

This new molecular form of PTH has structural integrity of the (1-4) region but presumably is modified in the region (15-20), which is usually recognized by the T-PTH assay. Its clinical implications remain to be defined.