The hepatic glucagon receptor. Solubilization, characterization, and development of an affinity adsorption assay for the soluble receptor

G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization and brain integration: focus on adenosinergic transmission

The control of glutamatergic corticostriatal transmission is essential for the induction and expression of plasticity mechanisms in the striatum, a phenomenon thickly regulated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Interestingly, in addition to dopamine receptors, adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors also play a key role in striatal functioning. The existence of a supramolecular organization (i.e. oligomer) containing dopamine, adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors in the striatal neurons is now being widely accepted by the scientific community. Indeed, these oligomers may enhance the diversity and performance by which extracellular striatal signals are transferred to the G-proteins in the process of receptor transduction, and also may allow unpredictable receptor-receptor allosteric regulations. Overall, here we want to review how formations of adenosine, dopamine and metabotropic glutamate receptors-containing oligomers impinge into striatal functioning in both normal and pathological conditions. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Brain Integration.

Adenosine receptor containing oligomers: their role in the control of dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the brain

While the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization has been questioned during the last fifteen years, the existence of a multi-receptor complex involving direct receptor-receptor interactions, called receptor oligomers, begins to be widely accepted. Eventually, it has been postulated that oligomers constitute a distinct functional form of the GPCRs with essential receptorial features. Also, it has been proven, under certain circumstances, that the GPCR oligomerization phenomenon is crucial for the receptor biosynthesis, maturation, trafficking, plasma membrane diffusion, and pharmacology and signalling. Adenosine receptors are GPCRs that mediate the physiological functions of adenosine and indeed these receptors do also oligomerize. Accordingly, adenosine receptor oligomers may improve the molecular mechanism by which extracellular adenosine signals are transferred to the G proteins in the process of receptor transduction. Importantly, these adenosine receptor-containing oligomers may allow not only the control of the adenosinergic function but also the fine-tuning modulation of other neurotransmitter systems (i.e. dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission). Overall, we underscore here recent significant developments based on adenosine receptor oligomerization that are essential for acquiring a better understanding of neurotransmission in the central nervous system under normal and pathological conditions.

G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization for what?

Although the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization has been questioned during the last decade, under some premises the existence of a supramolecular organization of these receptors begins now to be widely accepted by the scientific community. Indeed, GPCR oligomers may enhance the diversity and performance by which extracellular signals are transferred to the G proteins in the process of receptor transduction, although the mechanism that underlie this phenomenon remains still unexplained. Recently, a trans-conformational switching model has been proposed as a mechanism allowing direct inhibition of receptor activation. Thus, heterotropic receptor-receptor allosteric regulations are behind the GPCR oligomeric function. Accordingly, we revise here how GPCR oligomerization impinge in several important receptor functions like biosynthesis, plasma membrane diffusion or velocity, pharmacology and signaling. Overall, the rationale of receptor oligomerization might lie in the cellular need of sensing complex extracellular signals and to translate into a simple computational mode.

Functional consequences of 7TM receptor dimerization

7TM receptors work as signaling platforms that activate multiple signalling systems at the intracellular face of the plasma membrane. It is an emerging concept that 7TM receptors form homo- and hetero-dimers or -oligomers in vitro and in vivo. Numerous studies suggest dimerization is important for receptor function including agonist/antagonist affinity, efficacy, trafficking, and specificity of signal transduction, yet it remains unknown whether dimerization is a prerequisite for 7TM receptor signaling. The current review provides an overview of the biochemical support for 7TM homodimerization, followed by a discussion of the characteristics of homodimerization, with focus on dimer organization, and the functional consequences of dimerization. Heterodimerization will not generally be discussed in this review although we have included a few examples to illustrate specific points, and a table that summarises the current literature on this subject.

Ligand-independent CXCR2 dimerization

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization have been reported for several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The CXCR2 is a GPCR that is activated, among the others, by the chemokines CXCL8 (interleukin-8) and CXCL2 (growth-related gene product beta) to induce cell chemotaxis. We have investigated the oligomerization of CXCR2 receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells and generated a series of truncated mutants to determine whether they could negatively regulate the wild-type (wt) receptor functions. CXCR2 receptor oligomerization was also studied by coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein- and V5-tagged CXCR2. Truncated CXCR2 receptors retained their ability to form oligomers only if the region between the amino acids Ala-106 and Lys-163 was present. In contrast, all of the deletion mutants analyzed were able to form heterodimers with the wt CXCR2 receptor, albeit with different efficiency, competing for wt/wt dimer formation. The truncated CXCR2 mutants were not functional and, when coexpressed with wt CXCR2, interfered with receptor functions, impairing cell signaling and chemotaxis. When CXCR2 was expressed with the AMPA-type glutamate receptor GluR1, CXCR2 dimerization was again impaired in a dose-dependent way, and receptor functions were prejudiced. In contrast, CXCR1, a chemokine receptor that shares many similarities with CXCR2, did not dimerize alone or with CXCR2 and when coexpressed with CXCR2 did not impair receptor signaling and chemotaxis. The formation of CXCR2 dimers was also confirmed in cerebellar neuron cells. Taken together, we conclude from these studies that CXCR2 functions as a dimer and that truncated receptors negatively modulate receptor activities competing for the formation of wt/wt dimers.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled transmitter receptors

Examples of G-protein-coupled receptors that can be biochemically detected in homo- or heteromeric complexes are emerging at an accelerated rate. Biophysical approaches have confirmed the existence of several such complexes in living cells and there is strong evidence to support the idea that dimerization is important in different aspects of receptor biogenesis and function. While the existence of G-protein-coupled-receptor homodimers raises fundamental questions about the molecular mechanisms involved in transmitter recognition and signal transduction, the formation of heterodimers raises fascinating combinatorial possibilities that could underlie an unexpected level of pharmacological diversity, and contribute to cross-talk regulation between transmission systems. Because G-protein-coupled receptors are major pharmacological targets, the existence of dimers could have important implications for the development and screening of new drugs. Here, we review the evidence supporting the existence of G-protein-coupled-receptor dimerization and discuss its functional importance.

Homo-oligomeric complexes of the yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor are functional units of endocytosis

alpha-Factor receptors from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are G-protein-coupled receptors containing seven transmembrane segments. Receptors solubilized with the detergent n-dodecyl beta-D-maltoside were found to sediment as a single 8S species in glycerol density gradients. When the membranes from cells coexpressing two differentially tagged receptors were solubilized with detergent and subjected to immunoprecipitation, we found that the antibodies specific for either epitope tag resulted in precipitation of both tagged species. Coprecipitation was not a consequence of incomplete detergent extraction because the abundant plasma membrane protein Pma1 did not coprecipitate with the receptors. Moreover, the receptor complexes were present prior to detergent extraction because coimmunoprecipitation was not observed when cells expressing the single tagged species were mixed prior to membrane preparation. Treatment of cultures with alpha-factor had little effect on the extent of oligomerization as judged by the sedimentation behavior of the receptor complexes and by the efficiency of coimmunoprecipitation. The ability of receptor complexes to undergo ligand-mediated endocytosis was evaluated by using membrane fractionation and fluorescence microscopy. Mutant receptors that fail to bind alpha-factor (Ste2-S184R) or lack the endocytosis signal (Ste2-T326) became competent for ligand-mediated endocytosis when they were expressed in cells containing wild-type receptors. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain and intermolecular disulfide bonds were unnecessary for oligomer formation. We conclude that alpha-factor receptors form homo-oligomers and that these complexes are subject to ligand-mediated endocytosis. Furthermore, we show for the first time that unoccupied receptors participate in these endocytosis-competent complexes.

Functional significance of oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors

In contrast to other families of cell surface receptors for which dimerization is an integral part of the activation process, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were thought, until recently, to function as monomeric units. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that GPCRs could exist and be active as oligomeric complexes. Because they are major pharmacological targets, their existence as homo- or heterodimers could have important implications for the development and screening of new drugs.

A novel biological role for prostaglandin D2 is suggested by distribution studies of the rat DP prostanoid receptor

We report the cloning, functional expression and cell-specific localization of the rat homologue of the prostaglandin D2 receptor (DP). In situ hybridization, utilizing multiple digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes and their complementary sense controls, was performed to determine the detailed distribution of DP receptor mRNA in the central nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract. Within the brain, the leptomeninges and choroid plexus expressed DP receptor mRNA. Transcripts detected in the spinal cord were localized to the sensory and motor neurons of the dorsal and ventral horns, respectively, suggesting a role for the DP receptor in the modulation of central nervous system processes, including pain transmission. Within the gastrointestinal tract (stomach, duodenum, ileum and colon) signals were highly localized to the mucous-secreting goblet cells and the columnar epithelium. These findings suggest a novel biological role for prostaglandin D2-mediated activity at the DP receptor, namely mucous secretion. In addition, radioligand binding assays (saturation analyses and equilibrium competition assays) and functional assays (measuring cAMP accumulation) were performed to characterize the recombinant rat DP receptor expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293(EBNA) cells. A single site of binding (K(D) = 14 nM, Bmax = 115 fmol/mg protein) was measured for prostaglandin D2-specific binding to the rat DP receptor. Prostaglandin D2 proved to be a potent agonist at the rat DP receptor (EC50 = 5 nM). The rank order of efficacy for DP receptor specific agonists [prostaglandin D2 = prostaglandin J2 = BW 245C (5-(6-carboxyhexyl)-1-(3-cyclohexyl-3-hydroxypropylhydantoin)) > L-644,698 ((4-(3-(3-(3-hydroxyoctyl)-4-oxo-2-thiazolidinyl) propyl) benzoic acid) (racemate)] reflected the affinity with which the ligands bound to the receptor.

Intermolecular interactions between dimeric calcium-sensing receptor monomers are important for its normal function

We recently demonstrated that the G protein-coupled, extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) forms disulfide-linked dimers. The functional significance of dimerization of this receptor was suggested by our earlier observations that CaRs carrying certain point mutations exert dominant negative effects on the function of the coexpressed wild-type receptor both in vivo and when cotransfected in human embryonic kidney cells. In this study, we explored the functional consequences of CaR dimerization. Coexpression in human embryonic kidney cells of specific pairs of mutant CaRs, each with reduced or absent activity because of distinct loss-of-function mutations, results in the formation of heterodimers and partially reconstitutes extracellular calcium-dependent signaling. Moreover, our results suggest that the CaR has at least two functionally separable domains. However, the presence of an abnormal domain in each mutant monomer substantially impairs the function of the CaR heterodimer, resulting in the reconstituted CaRs having characteristics distinct from those of the wild-type CaR. Our study suggests that intermolecular interactions within the dimeric CaR are important for the receptor's function.

Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and glucagon: the evolution of their receptors

Insulin and glucagon, two of the most studied pancreatic hormones bind to specific membrane receptors to exert their biological actions. Insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGF-II are structurally related to insulin, although they are expressed ubiquitously. The biological functions of the IGFs are mediated by different transmembrane receptors, which includes the insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II receptors. The interaction of insulin, insulin related peptides and glucagon with the corresponding receptors has been studied extensively in mammals and continues to be so. At the same time, research on ectothermic animals has made enormous progress in the recent years. This paper summarizes current knowledge on insulin, IGF-I and glucagon receptors, from a comparative point of view with special attention to non-mammalian vertebrates. The review covers adult and mostly typical target tissues, and with very few exceptions, developmental aspects are not considered. Binding characteristics, tissue distribution and structure of insulin and IGF-I receptors will be considered first, because both ligands and receptors are structurally related and have overlapping functions. These sections will be followed by similar distribution of information on glucagon receptors. Readers interested in either structure or functions of insulin, IGFs and glucagon in nonmammalian vertebrates are referred to other reviews (Mommsen TP, Plisetskaya EM. Insulin in fishes and agnathans: history, structure and metabolic regulation. Rev Aquat Sci 1991;4:225-259; Mommsen TP, Plisetskaya EM. Metabolic and endocrine functions of glucagon-like peptides: evolutionary and biochemical perspectives. Fish Physiol Biochem 1993;11:429-438; Duguay SJ, Mommsen TP. Molecular aspects of pancreatic peptides. In: Sherwood NM, Hew CL, editors, Fish Physiology. vol 13. 1994:225-271; Plisetskaya EM, Mommsen TP. Glucagon and glucagon-like peptides in fishes. Int Rev Citol 1996;168:187-257.).

Dimerization of the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) on the cell surface of CaR-transfected HEK293 cells

The extracellular calcium (Ca2+o)-sensing receptor (CaR) is a G protein-coupled receptor that plays important roles in calcium homeostasis. In this study, we employed epitope tagging, cell-surface biotinylation, and immunoprecipitation techniques to demonstrate that the CaR is expressed mostly in the form of a dimer on the surface of transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. Western analysis of cell-surface proteins under nonreducing conditions showed that the CaR exists in several forms with molecular masses greater than 200 kDa. Most of these high molecular mass forms of the receptor could be converted to a single monomeric species at 160 kDa under reducing conditions. This result suggests that the CaR forms dimers or even higher oligomers on the cell surface through intermolecular disulfide bonds that are sensitive to reducing agents. Consistent with this hypothesis, use of a cell-surface cross-linking agent substantially increases the proportion of the putative dimeric CaR at 280 kDa relative to the monomeric form of the receptor at 160 kDa under reducing conditions. Dimerization of the CaR in intact cells was further demonstrated when we co-transfected and co-immunoprecipitated the wild type, full-length receptor and a truncated form of the CaR lacking its cytoplasmic tail. Taken together, we conclude from these results that the functional CaR resides on the cell surface of transfected HEK293 cells in the form of a dimer.

Structural and functional aspects of G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the single largest family of cell surface receptors involved in signal transduction. It is estimated that several hundred distinct members of this receptor family in humans direct responses to a wide variety of chemical transmitters, including biogenic amines, amino acids, peptides, lipids, nucleosides, and large polypeptides. These transmembrane receptors are key controllers of such diverse physiological processes as neurotransmission, cellular metabolism, secretion, cellular differentiation, and growth as well as inflammatory and immune responses. GPCRs therefore represent major targets for the development of new drug candidates with potential application in all clinical fields. Many currently used therapeutics act by either activating (agonists) or blocking (antagonists) GPCRs. Studies over the past two decades have provided a wealth of information on the biochemical events underlying cellular signalling by GPCRs. However, our understanding of the molecular interactions between ligands and the receptor protein and, particularly, of the structural correlates of receptor activation or inhibition by agonists and inverse agonists, respectively, is still rudimentary. Most of the work in this area has focused on mapping regions of the receptor responsible for drug binding affinity. Although binding of ligand molecules to specific receptors represents the first event in the action of drugs, the efficacy with which this binding is translated into a physiological response remains the only determinant of therapeutic utility. In the last few years, increasing evidence suggested that receptor oligomerization and in particular dimerization may play an important role in the molecular events leading to GPCR activation. In this paper, we review the biochemical and functional evidence supporting this notion.Key words: G proteins, receptors, dimerization, signal transduction, adrenergic.

Identification of endothelin receptor subtypes in sheep choroid plexus

Endothelin (ET) and its G-protein-coupled receptors are distributed in a wide variety of tissues, including the brain. In this study, we have identified and characterized the endothelin receptor subtypes in sheep choroid plexus. Competitive binding experiments using [125I]ET-1 and the receptor subtype-selective ligands, ET-1, ET-3, BQ-123, Sarafotoxin 6c, and [Ala1,3,11,15] ET-1 demonstrated the presence of both ETA and ETB receptor subtypes in the ratio of 30:70. In addition, a small fraction of the total binding sites exhibited affinities for ET-1 in the subpicomolar range. Chemical crosslinking of [125I]ET-1 with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)-suberate (BS3) to choroid plexus membranes revealed the presence of two bands, with apparent molecular masses of 89 and 45 kDa, corresponding to the ETA receptor, and three bands, with apparent molecular masses of 75, 58, and 33 kDa, corresponding to the ETB receptor. Of considerable interest was the finding that dimers of the [125I]ET-1-occupied ETA receptor could be identified by crosslinking, as could apparent dimers and tetramers of [125I]ET-1, but only when bound to receptor. In addition to mapping the distribution of ET receptors in sheep choroid plexus, our results strongly suggest that ET-1 binding to the ETA receptor leads to dimer formation.

Synthetic rat V1a vasopressin receptor fragments interfere with vasopressin binding via specific interaction with the receptor

To study the vasopressin receptor domains involved in the hormonal binding, we synthesized natural and modified fragments of V1a vasopressin receptor and tested their abilities to affect hormone-receptor interactions. Natural fragments mimicking the external loops one, two, and three were able to inhibit specific vasopressin binding to V1a receptor. In contrast, the natural N-terminal part of the V1a vasopressin receptor was found inactive. One fragment, derived from the external second loop and containing an additional C-terminal cysteine amide, was able to fully inhibit the specific binding of both labeled vasopressin agonist and antagonist to rat liver V1a vasopressin receptor and the vasopressin-sensitive phospholipase C of WRK1 cells. The peptide-mediated inhibition involved specific interactions between the V1a receptor and synthetic V1a vasopressin receptor fragment since 1) it was dependent upon the vasopressin receptor subtype tested (Ki(app) for the peptide: 3.7, 14.6, and 64.5 microM for displacing [3H]vasopressin from rat V1a, V1b, and V2 receptors, respectively; 2) it was specific and did not affect sarcosin 1-angiotensin II binding to rat liver membranes; 3) it was not mimicked by vasopressin receptor unrelated peptides exhibiting putative detergent properties; and 4) no direct interaction between [3H]vasopressin and synthetic peptide linked to an affinity chromatography column could be observed. Such an inhibition affected both the maximal binding capacity of the V1a vasopressin receptor and its affinity for the labeled hormone, depending upon the dose of synthetic peptide used and was partially irreversible. Structure-activity studies using a serie of synthetic fragments revealed the importance of their size and cysteinyl composition. These data indicate that some peptides mimicking extracellular loops of the V1a vasopressin receptor may interact with the vasopressin receptor itself and modify its coupling with phospholipase C.

A peptide derived from a beta2-adrenergic receptor transmembrane domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation

One of the assumptions of the mobile receptor hypothesis as it relates to G protein-coupled receptors is that the stoichiometry of receptor, G protein, and effector is 1:1:1 (Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., and McCormick, F.(1990) Nature 348, 125-132). Many studies on the cooperativity of agonist binding are incompatible with this notion and have suggested that both G proteins and their associated receptors can be oligomeric. However, a clear physical demonstration that G protein-coupled receptors can indeed interact as dimers and that such interactions may have functional consequences was lacking. Here, using differential epitope tagging we demonstrate that beta2-adrenergic receptors do form SDS-resistant homodimers and that transmembrane domain VI of the receptor may represent part of an interface for receptor dimerization. The functional importance of dimerization is supported by the observation that a peptide derived from this domain that inhibits dimerization also inhibits beta-adrenergic agonist-promoted stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity. Moreover, agonist stimulation was found to stabilize the dimeric state of the receptor, while inverse agonists favored the monomeric species, which suggests that interconversion between monomeric and dimeric forms may be important for biological activity.

Cooperativity manifest in the binding properties of purified cardiac muscarinic receptors

Muscarinic receptors were solubilized from porcine atria in digitonin-cholate and were purified by chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose and 3-(2'-aminobenzhydryloxy)tropane-Sepharose. The product identified on Western blots migrated with an apparent molecular mass of 60-75 kDa, with additional bands indicative of homotrimers (190 kDa) and homotetramers (240 kDa). Receptor eluted from the affinity column was accompanied by a mixture of guanyl nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) identified on Western blots as Gi1/2, G(o), Gq/11, and Gs (preparation M2G); the G-proteins were largely removed by further processing on hydroxyapatite (preparation M2). Solubilized purified receptors bound muscarinic ligands in an apparently cooperative manner. In studies at equilibrium, the antagonists [3H]AF-DX 384, N-[3H]methylscopolamine (NMS), and [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate (QNB) revealed Hill coefficients between about 0.8 and 1.2. Also, the apparent capacity for [3H]QNB exceeded that for [3H]AF-DX 384 and [3H]NMS by about 1.5-fold in M2 and by 2-fold in M2G. Binding to M2G at high concentrations of [3H]QNB was fully inhibited by unlabeled NMS, which therefore affected sites not labeled at similar concentrations of [3H]NMS. Oxotremorine-M displayed a biphasic inhibitory effect on the binding of [3H]AF-DX 384 in M2 and M2G, suggesting that multiple states of affinity are intrinsic to the receptor; 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate was without appreciable effect in M2 but resulted in a bell-shaped binding profile for the agonist in M2G. All of the data can be described in terms of cooperative interactions within a receptor that is at least tetravalent and presumably an oligomer. In the context of the model, copurifying G-proteins and guanyl nucleotides serve to regulate the degree of cooperativity between successive equivalents of muscarinic ligands.

Radioautographic demonstration and localization of glucagon receptors in duck brain

The discovery of glucagon biosynthesis and receptors within mammalian brain has led one to suspect a neurotransmitter role for glucagon. In order to address this hypothesis in birds, we investigated the existence of glucagon receptors in duck brain by radioligand binding on fresh tissue sections and radioautography. Specific high-affinity [125I]glucagon binding sites similar to those in the liver were demonstrated in the avian brain. Mapping of these putative glucagon receptors revealed a discrete distributional pattern. Most of the [125I]glucagon binding capacity in duck brain is concentrated within the telencephalon, mainly in components of motor and limbic systems. Specific labeling densities were associated with avian equivalents of the mammalian pyramidal system (hyperstriatum accessorium; archistriatum intermedium and tractus occipitomesencephalicus) and extrapyramidal system (paleostriatum augmentatum, paleostriatum primitivum and lobus parolfactorius), as well as several limbic structures (hippocampal formation, nucleus taeniae and the caudal part of the archistriatum). Few glucagon-reactive foci were detected in the diencephalon (the nucleus dorsomedialis of hypothalamus, the two circumventricular organs, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis and median eminence and the nucleus habenularis medialis). These findings suggest that glucagon might be involved in the central control of somatic motricity and basic behaviors and point therefore to glucagon as a new neuroactive messenger in avian brain. The extensive difference between the distribution of glucagon binding sites observed in duck brain and that previously reported in rat brain suggests that glucagon does not subserve the same physiological role(s) in avian and mammalian brains.

Glucagon responses in rabbits with obstructive jaundice and a low energy status in the liver

Glucagon has a choleretic effect and also stimulates energy-consuming reactions, such as gluconeogenesis and ureogenesis in the liver. The effect of glucagon on energy metabolism in the liver was analyzed in rabbits with obstructive jaundice that had severe liver damage, indicated by significantly lower hepatic energy charge levels. The gluconeogenetic responses to glucagon administration, as shown by increases in the plasma glucose levels, were usually observed in normal rabbits, but these responses were completely depressed after glucagon administration in rabbits with obstructive jaundice. The energy charge levels in the latter animals decreased even further after glucagon administration. Even though the energy consumption for gluconeogenesis after glucagon administration was limited in the jaundiced rabbits, it was sufficient to cause a deterioration in the hepatic energy balance. The above findings show that the administration of glucagon increases the amount of energy expended in the liver following a reduction in the hepatic energy charge in rabbits with obstructive jaundice. Therefore, even though glucagon has a choleretic effect, it should be administered carefully to patients with obstructive jaundice, especially in those with severe liver damage, such as in patients with cholangitis.

Regulation of hepatocyte adenylate cyclase by amylin and CGRP: a single receptor displaying apparent negative cooperatively towards CGRP and simple saturation kinetics for amylin, a requirement for phosphodiesterase inhibition to observe elevated hepatocyte cyclic AMP levels and the phosphorylation of Gi-2

Challenge of intact hepatocytes with amylin only succeeded in elevating intracellular cyclic AMP levels and activating phosphorylase in the presence of the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX. Both amylin and CGRP similarly activated adenylate cyclase, around 5-fold, although approximately 400-fold higher levels of amylin were required to elicit half maximal activation. Amylin activated adenylate cyclase though apparently simple Michaelien kinetics whereas CGRP elicited activation by kinetics indicative of apparent negative co-operativity. Use of the antagonist CGPP(8-37) showed that both CGRP and amylin activated hepatocyte adenylate cyclase through a common receptor by a mnemonical mechanism where it was proposed that the receptor co-existed in interconvertible high and low affinity states for CGRP. It is suggested that this model may serve as a paradigm for G-protein linked receptors in general. Amylin failed to both stimulate inositol phospholipid metabolism in hepatocytes and to elicit the desensitization of glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase. Amylin did, however, elicit the phosphorylation of the inhibitory guanine nucleotide regulatory protein Gi-2 in hepatocytes and prevented the action of insulin in reducing the level of phosphorylation of this G-protein.

Receptors for gut regulatory peptides

Receptors for regulatory peptides (hormones or neurotransmitters) play a pivotal role in the ability of cells to taste the rich neuroendocrine environment of the gut. Recognition of low concentration of peptides with a high specificity and translation of the peptide-receptor interaction into a biological response through different signalling pathways (adenylyl cyclase-cAMP or phospholipase C-phosphatidylinositol) are crucial properties of receptors. While many new receptors have been identified and thereafter characterized functionally during the 1980s, molecular biology now emerges as the privileged way for the structural characterization and discovery of receptors. Different strategies of receptor cloning have been developed which may or may not require prior receptor purification. Among cloning strategies that do not require receptor purification, homology screening of cDNA libraries, expression of receptor cDNA or mRNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes or in COS cells, and the polymerase chain reaction method achieved great success, e.g. cloning of receptors for cholecystokinin, gastrin, glucagon-like peptide 1, gastrin-releasing peptide/bombesin, neuromedin K, neuropeptide Y, neurotensin, opioids, secretin, somatostatin, substance K, substance P and vasoactive intestinal peptide. All these receptors belong to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors which consist of a single polypeptide chain (350-450 amino acids) with seven transmembrane segments, an N-terminal extracellular domain and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. In this chapter, we have detailed the properties of three receptors which play an important role in digestive tract physiology and illustrate various signal transduction pathways: pancreatic beta-cell galanin receptors which mediate inhibition of insulin release and intestinal epithelial receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide YY, which mediate the stimulation and inhibition of water and electrolyte secretion, respectively.

Synthetic linear and cyclic glucagon antagonists

The synthesis and biological activities of seven new glucagon analogues are reported. The design of compounds 2-5 is based on potent antagonists recently reported from this laboratory, where we have focused on modifications in the N-terminal region. In this report we have concentrated specifically on modifications to histidine-1. In addition we have prepared two cyclic compounds 7 and 8, related to a linear in vivo antagonist [Glu9]glucagon, reported by Merrifield (Unson et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 4083-4087). The N-terminal modifications involved substitution of His1 by the unnatural conformationally constrained residue (S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5-oxoimidazo(1,5-c)pyrimidine-7-carboxylic acid (Toc), desaminohistidine (dHis) and 3-(4-nitrobenzyl)histidine. The structures of the new compounds are as follows. [Toc1,D-Phe4,Tyr5,Arg12,Lys17,18,Glu21]glucagon (2); [Toc1,D-Phe4,Tyr5,Arg12,Lys17,18,Glu21]glucagon amide (3); [3-(4-nitrobenzyl)His1,D-Phe4,Tyr5,Arg12,Lys17,18,G lu21]glucagon (4); [dHis1,D-Phe4,Tyr5,Arg12,Lys17,18,Glu21]glucagon (5); [dHis1,Glu9]glucagon (6); (desHis1)[Glu9,Lys12]glucagon amide (7); (desHis1)-[Glu9,Lys12,Asp15]glucagon amide (8). The binding potencies of the linear analogues, as expressed a percentage of glucagon binding, are 2.6 (2), 0.13 (3), 0.8 (4), 0.8 (5), 2.2 (6). Both cyclic analogues 7 and 8 show biphasic binding curves. The IC50 values for 7 at the high and low affinity sites are 1.5 and 167 nM, respectively (IC50 of glucagon = 1.3 nM). The IC50 values for 8 at the high and low affinity sites are 4.7 and 3451 nM, respectively. The cyclic analogues are characterized by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry of endoproteinase ASP-N digests. The specificity of the enzyme used in these studies enables differentiation of isomers of the cyclic glucagon analogues which differ only in the position of cyclic amide bond. Analogues 2, 3 and 5-8 are glucagon receptor antagonists with respect to the glucagon receptor coupled to the adenylate cyclase (AC) system. Analogue 4 is a partial agonist (5.7% compared to glucagon) of AC. Introduction of unusual amino acids which do not contain a primary alpha-amino group such as Toc at the N-terminus is expected to increase in vivo metabolic stability by protecting against degradation by aminopeptidases.

Effects of adenyl nucleotides and carbachol on cooperative interactions among G proteins

Muscarinic agonists and adenyl nucleotides are noncompetitive modulators of sites labeled by [35S]GTP gamma S in washed cardiac membranes from Syrian golden hamsters. Specific binding of the radioligand and its inhibition by either GTP gamma S or GDP reveals three states of affinity for guanyl nucleotides. In the absence of adenyl nucleotide, carbachol promotes an apparent interconversion of sites from higher to lower affinity for GDP; the effect recalls that of guanyl nucleotides on the binding of agonists to muscarinic receptors. In the presence of 0.1 mM ATP gamma S, the binding of [35S]GTP gamma S is increased at concentrations up to about 50 nM and decreased at higher concentrations. At a radioligand concentration of 160 pM, binding exhibits a bell-shaped dependence on the concentration of both ATP gamma S and AMP-PNP; with ADP and ATP, there is a second increase in bound [35S]GTP gamma S at the highest concentrations of adenyl nucleotide. ATP gamma S and AMP-PNP also modulate the effect of GDP, which itself emerges as a cooperative process: that is, binding of the radioligand in the presence of AMP-PNP exhibits a bell-shaped dependence on the concentration of GDP; moreover, the GDP-dependent increase in bound [35S]GTP gamma S is enhanced by carbachol. The interactions among GDP, GTP gamma S, and carbachol can be rationalized quantitatively in terms of a cooperative model involving two sites tentatively identified as G proteins. Both GTP gamma S and GDP exhibit negative homotropic cooperativity; carbachol enhances the homotropic cooperativity of GDP and induces or enhances positive heterotropic cooperativity between GDP and [35S]GTP gamma S. An analogous mechanism may underlie the guanyl nucleotide-dependent binding of agonists to muscarinic receptors. The data suggest that the binding properties of G proteins and their associated receptors reflect cooperative effects within heterooligomeric arrays; agonist-induced changes in cooperativity may facilitate the exchange of GTP for bound GDP and thereby constitute the mechanism of G protein activation in vivo.

Solubilization and hydrodynamic characteristics of the erythropoietin receptor. Evidence for a multimeric complex

In order to study the erythropoietin receptor in its native state, we solubilized erythropoietin-receptor complexes from spleen cell membranes of mice infected with the anemia strain of Friend virus using mild detergents. Among 11 tested detergents, Triton X-100 and Lubrol PX were the most effective. Triton X-100 was therefore selected for this study. The solubilized complexes appeared to be well representative of the total membrane receptor population as indicated by cross-linking experiments and affinity measurements. The hydrodynamic characteristics of the complexes were determined by gel filtration chromatography and ultracentrifugation through sucrose gradients prepared with H2O or D2O. Although erythropoietin-receptor-detergent complexes exhibited some heterogeneity, we determined the following minimal hydrodynamic values: sedimentation coefficient (s20,w): 11.7 +/- 0.8 S, Stokes radius: 7.7 +/- 0.2 nm, partial specific volume: 0.774 +/- 0.017 ml/g, giving a molecular mass of 458 +/- 66 kDa. The contribution of the detergent was estimated to be 28% from the measured partial specific volume, giving an estimated molecular mass of 330 +/- 48 kDa for the erythropoietin-receptor complex. The minimal molecular mass value was significantly greater than those obtained by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions, strongly suggesting that the erythropoietin receptors were present as multimeric complexes. The nature of these complexes is discussed. Beside this major component our results revealed the presence of higher-molecular-mass erythropoietin binding components. We also demonstrated that erythropoietin-receptor complexes could be precipitated with anti-erythropoietin antibodies. This property should greatly improve the purification of erythropoietin receptors.

Effect of tunicamycin on functions of PGE1 receptors from mouse mastocytoma P-815 cells

Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) receptors from mouse mastocytoma P-815 cells were found to bind to a wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-Agarose column, suggesting that the receptors are glycoproteins. To further elucidate the role of carbohydrate moieties in the PGE1 receptors for their binding activity to ligand, the P-815 cells were treated with tunicamycin, swainsonine or monensin. Tunicamycin, an inhibitor of N-glycosylation, dose- and time-dependently inhibited the binding of PGE1 to mastocytoma P-815 cells. Neither swainsonine, an inhibitor of Golgi mannosidase II, nor monensin, an inhibitor of processing beyond the high mannose stage, altered PGE1 binding properties of the cells. The inhibition of PGE1 binding by tunicamycin was observed when incorporation of [3H]glucosamine into macromolecules was inhibited. The inhibitory effect was not on their affinity but on their number of binding sites. Subcellular distributions of [3H]PGE1-binding activity showed that decreases in the binding activity by tunicamycin were highest in plasma membrane fractions. Treatment of membranes with various endo- and exoglycosidases did not affect PGE1 binding. PGE1-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in the cells was also inhibited by tunicamycin. These results suggest that PGE1 receptors of mastocytoma P-815 cells are glycoproteins and that inhibition of N-glycosylation of PGE1 receptors by tunicamycin results in the arrest of the translocation of newly synthesized receptors to the surface of mastocytoma P-815 cells.

Stabilization of soluble active rat liver glucagon receptor

Active glucagon receptor was solubilized with 3-(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio-1-propanesulfonate (Chaps) from rat liver plasma membranes but rapidly (less than 8 h) lost activity. Either inclusion of 1X Hanks' balanced salt solution in the 3 mM Chaps solubilization buffer or its addition after solubilization increased the percentage of total binding attributable to specific glucagon binding from approximately 10 to greater than 80%; of great importance, it increased the stability from near zero binding at 8 h to 50% binding at 48 h (4 degrees C). Of the Hanks' solution components, either NaCl (137 mM) or CaCl2 (1.26 mM) was effective in increasing specific binding to approximately 70 and 60% respectively: Mg salts were ineffective. Soluble receptor binding activity was assayed by dextran-coated charcoal adsorption of free hormone. The assay is rapid, simple, and reproducible. It is suitable for monitoring receptor activity during purification and molecular characterization. Competition binding studies gave an IC50 value of 10-20 nM (slope factor approximately 1), with or without GTP. Dissociation assays revealed GTP sensitivity when receptors were solubilized either as glucagon-receptor complexes or free receptor. Active glucagon-receptor complexes could be eluted from wheat germ lectin-agarose: neither concanavalin A-agarose nor soybean agglutinin-agarose bind receptor. A glucagon degrading activity which co-solubilized with the receptor but did not require detergent for extraction was distinguishable from the soluble receptor not only by solubility but also by its heat stability (30 degrees C), its inhibition by bacitracin, its affinity for glucagon, its retention of activity for at least 1 week at 4 degrees C, and its size.

The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) receptor: recent data and hypothesis

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neuropeptide with a broad range of biological activities in various tissues. After interaction with its membrane receptor, VIP generally induces a very large increase in the intracellular cyclic AMP level. Receptors for VIP have been described in numerous tissues and cell lines. The first results on VIP receptor structure have been obtained by covalent cross-linking using bifunctional reagents. The molecular mass of the different components characterized in this way differs greatly according to the species and the tissue used. This heterogeneity may reflect either a difference in the length of the cross-linked polypeptide backbone or differently glycosylated forms of the same polypeptide. The VIP binding site of intact human adenocarcinoma cells (HT29 cells) is an Mr 64,000 glycoprotein with 20kDa of N-linked oligosaccharide side chains containing sialic acid. The structure of the VIP binding site from HT29 cell is compared, first to the structure of the VIP receptor from other tissues, particularly that from rat liver, and second to the structure of the hepatic glucagon binding site. Recently, solubilization of the VIP receptor in an active form has provided a new way of studying this receptor. The HT29 cell line is an appropriate model to study the dynamics of the VIP receptor. After binding to its receptor, VIP is rapidly internalized, probably by receptor-mediated endocytosis. This internalization leads to a decrease in the cell surface receptor number and simultaneously to a homologous desensitization of adenylate cyclase. VIP is then degraded in the lysosomes, while most of the receptors are recycled back to the cell surface. The presence of an intracellular pool of unoccupied VIP receptors has been demonstrated after inactivation of the cell surface receptors by chymotrypsin. The kinetics of the receptor reappearance at the cell surface, after inactivation by chymotrypsin or after receptor-mediated endocytosis, indicate 2 possible intracellular pathways for occupied and unoccupied VIP receptors.

Membrane receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

This review focusses on the roles that membrane receptors and their transducers play in the physiology and pathology of the gastrointestinal tract. The multifactorial regulation of [correction] mucosal growth and function is discussed in relation to the heterogeneity of exocrine and endocrine populations that originate from progenitor cells in stomach and intestine.

Semisynthetic D-His1,N epsilon-acetimidoglucagon: structure-function relationships

The histidine residue at the amino terminus of lysine-12 protected glucagon was replaced by its D-isomer by an established semisynthetic strategy to extend a stepwise series of replacements at this position. The product was examined for its secondary structure and its function. Circular dichroism spectra obtained at concentrations from 0.25 to 1.09 mg/ml at pH 10.2 in 0.2 M phosphate buffer were similar to those obtained with native hormone. Competitive binding assays and adenylate cyclase activation assays with partially purified rat liver plasma membranes show this D-His1 analog of glucagon to be a full agonist, causing the same maximum activation of adenylate cyclase as native hormone; but both binding and activation assays show the binding affinity to be diminished about 10-fold. The data suggest that the adjustment of the bonding of the imidazole group to the receptor to bring about transduction results in constraints on the conformation along the peptide sequence which interfere with the peptide adopting the same binding conformation achieved by the native hormone.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor in hamster pancreatic beta cells. Direct cross-linking, solubilization and characterization as a glycoprotein

125I-labelled gastric inhibitory polypeptide (125I-GIP) is directly cross-linked to its specific receptor in hamster pancreatic beta cell membranes by using an ultraviolet irradiation procedure. This approach results in the identification of a GIP-protein complex of apparent Mr 64,000. The labelling of this protein species is specific since it is inhibited when incubating the membranes with increasing doses of native GIP (0.1 nM-1 microM) together with 125I-GIP, half-maximal inhibition being elicited by 5 nM peptide. Reduction of the GIP-protein complex by 100 mM dithiothreitol induces a decrease of the electrophoretic mobility of the complex. Alternatively pretreatment of membranes with dithiothreitol (up to 1 M) does not prevent the binding of 125I-GIP to its receptor. When prelabelled membranes are extracted by 0.5% Triton X-100 (v/v) and the extract is layered on a Sephadex G-50 column, a high peak of radioactivity is eluted with the void volume of the column. Treatment of this peak by 10 min ultraviolet irradiation followed by SDS-PAGE leads to identification of a major band of Mr 64,000. When the peak is further layered on Sephacryl S-200 it yields a single peak of radioactivity corresponding to a protein species with a Stokes radius of 3.2 nm and an apparent Mr of 65,000. The solubilized GIP-receptor complex is specifically adsorbed by Sepharose coupled to wheat germ agglutinin and concanavalin A and eluted from these lectins by their respective sugars. In conclusion the GIP receptor in pancreatic beta cells is a protein monomer of apparent Mr 59 000; its structure is maintained by intrachain disulfide bridges, these bonds being, however, not involved in the interaction of GIP with its receptor; the GIP receptor is a glycoprotein containing N-acetylglucosamine, mannose and probably sialic acid in its carbohydrate moiety.

The receptors of the VIP family peptides (VIP, secretin, GRF, PHI, PHM, GIP, glucagon and oxyntomodulin). Specificities and identity

A model is proposed for the receptors of the VIP family peptides including a ligand and a cellular domain. Specificities of the receptors are due to different ligand binding sites. Three subgroups of the family can be distinguished accordingly: glucagon and oxyntomodulin; GIP; VIP, secretin r and hGRF, PHI and PHM. In the same species, the expression of these different sites is cell-specific resulting in a stoichiometry of the ligand-receptor interaction which is compatible with physiological regulation of cell function. Specificities of the interaction as studied by native and synthetic analogs is supported both by restricted sequences of amino acids (such as that including the N-terminal histidine residue), and membrane-induced configuration of the ligand. Identity of the receptors is related to their interactions with subunits of the adenylate cyclase system. Arguments are put forward indicating that the alpha subunit of the guanyl regulatory protein is a reasonable candidate for directly transducing to the adenylyl cyclase the information contained in the activated ligand-binding site subunits. Evidence of functional and molecular heterogeneity of the recognizing site and of the alpha subunits leads to the supposition that some types of specific complementarity is retained at this level of interaction, further enhancing the possibility of species and cell differences. On the other hand, the identities found in other sequences of the alpha and ras oncogene products extend to the receptor of the VIP family peptides a pattern of organization which is similar to that recently described for the insulin family of receptors. The role of ligand specific receptor mediated regulation in homologous or heterologous desensitization is reviewed in brief for the peptides of the VIP family as well as the appearance of the specific receptor during the ontogenesis or the cell differentiation. The co-distribution of plasma membrane receptors from other families further adds to the cell specificity resulting for each differentiated cell in unique patterns of recognizing site. Some examples of receptor-receptor interaction are given, indicating that the integration of the different signals by cells might occur at an early step through the transmembranair domain of the receptor.