Two forms of RPO41-dependent RNA polymerase. Regulation of the RNA polymerase by glucose repression may control yeast mitochondrial gene expression

Yeast Mitochondrial Transcription Factor Mtf1 Determines the Precision of Promoter-Directed Initiation of RNA Polymerase Rpo41

Despite their clear T7-bacteriophage origin, mitochondrial RNA polymerases have evolved to require transcription factors. All mitochondrial polymerases contain an extra N-terminal domain that has no counterpart in the self-proficient phage enzyme, which is therefore hypothesized to interact with transcription factors. We studied a series of N-terminal deletion mutants of yeast mitochondrial RNA polymerase, Rpo41, and have found that the N-terminal region does not abolish the effects of Mtf1; rather it contributes directly to enzyme catalysis. Mtf1 can rescue the defective Rpo41 enzymes resulted from N-terminal domain deletions. Although Rpo41 appears to have retained all promoter recognition elements found in T7 RNAP, the elements are not independently functional, and Mtf1 is necessary and sufficient for holoenzyme promoter-directed transcription activity.

Assembly of mitochondrial cytochrome c-oxidase, a complicated and highly regulated cellular process

Cytochrome c-oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a key role in the regulation of aerobic production of energy. Biogenesis of eukaryotic COX involves the coordinated action of two genomes. Three mitochondrial DNA-encoded subunits form the catalytic core of the enzyme, which contains metal prosthetic groups. Another 10 subunits encoded in the nuclear DNA act as a protective shield surrounding the core. COX biogenesis requires the assistance of >20 additional nuclear-encoded factors acting at all levels of the process. Expression of the mitochondrial-encoded subunits, expression and import of the nuclear-encoded subunits, insertion of the structural subunits into the mitochondrial inner membrane, addition of prosthetic groups, assembly of the holoenzyme, further maturation to form a dimer, and additional assembly into supercomplexes are all tightly regulated processes in a nuclear-mitochondrial-coordinated fashion. Such regulation ensures the building of a highly efficient machine able to catalyze the safe transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen and ultimately facilitate the aerobic production of ATP. In this review, we will focus on describing and analyzing the present knowledge about the different regulatory checkpoints in COX assembly and the dynamic relationships between the different factors involved in the process. We have used information mostly obtained from the suitable yeast model, but also from bacterial and animal systems, by means of large-scale genetic, molecular biology, and physiological approaches and by integrating information concerning individual elements into a cellular system network.

Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Although sugars are clearly the preferred carbon sources of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nonfermentable substrates such as ethanol, glycerol, lactate, acetate or oleate can also be used for the generation of energy and cellular biomass. Several regulatory networks of glucose repression (carbon catabolite repression) are involved in the coordinate biosynthesis of enzymes required for the utilization of nonfermentable substrates. Positively and negatively acting complexes of pleiotropic regulatory proteins have been characterized. The Snf1 (Cat1) protein kinase complex, together with its regulatory subunit Snf4 (Cat3) and alternative beta-subunits Sip1, Sip2 or Gal83, plays an outstanding role for the derepression of structural genes which are repressed in the presence of a high glucose concentration. One molecular function of the Snf1 complex is deactivation by phosphorylation of the general glucose repressor Mig1. In addition to regulation of alternative sugar fermentation, Mig1 also influences activators of respiration and gluconeogenesis, although to a lesser extent. Snf1 is also required for conversion of specific regulatory factors into transcriptional activators. This review summarizes regulatory cis-acting elements of structural genes of the nonfermentative metabolism, together with the corresponding DNA-binding proteins (Hap2-5, Rtg1-3, Cat8, Sip4, Adr1, Oaf1, Pip2), and describes the molecular interactions among general regulators and pathway-specific factors. In addition to the influence of the carbon source at the transcriptional level, mechanisms of post-transcriptional control such as glucose-regulated stability of mRNA are also discussed briefly.

Ctr9, Rtf1, and Leo1 are components of the Paf1/RNA polymerase II complex

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Paf1-RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex is biochemically and functionally distinct from the Srb-mediator form of Pol II holoenzyme and is required for full expression of a subset of genes. In this work we have used tandem affinity purification tags to isolate the Paf1 complex and mass spectrometry to identify additional components. We have established that Ctr9, Rtf1, and Leo1 are factors that associate with Paf1, Cdc73, and Pol II, but not with the Srb-mediator. Deletion of either PAF1 or CTR9 leads to similar severe pleiotropic phenotypes, which are unaltered when the two mutations are combined. In contrast, we found that deletion of LEO1 or RTF1 leads to few obvious phenotypes, although mutation of RTF1 suppresses mutations in TATA-binding protein, alters transcriptional start sites, and affects elongation. Remarkably, deletion of LEO1 or RTF1 suppresses many paf1Delta phenotypes. In particular, an rtf1Delta paf1Delta double mutant grew faster, was less temperature sensitive, and was more resistant to caffeine and hydroxyurea than a paf1Delta single mutant. In addition, expression of the G(1) cyclin CLN1, reduced nearly threefold in paf1Delta, is restored to wild-type levels in the rtf1Delta paf1Delta double mutant. We suggest that lack of Paf1 results in a defective complex and a block in transcription, which is relieved by removal of Leo1 or Rtf1.

Apparent functional independence of the mitochondrial and nuclear transcription systems in cultured human cells

We have constructed a series of reporter constructs which test the effects of sequence elements from the control region of human mitochondrial DNA on expression in the nucleus, as assayed by transient expression in cultured human cells. The mitochondrial heavy-strand promoter (HSP) was unable to function as a promoter in nuclear DNA. Neither the HSP, nor the binding region for the mitochondrial transcription factor mtTF1 from the light-strand promoter, had any significant or systematic modulatory effects upon transcription from strong or weak RNA polymerase II (pol II) promoters, in three different human cell lines. The same finding held true regardless of orientation with respect to the start site of transcription. Similar results were obtained with a rho 0 derivative of one of these lines, indicating that mitochondrial promoter sequences in the nucleus cannot modulate transcription in response to altered mtDNA copy number. These results support the view that the nuclear and mitochondrial transcription systems in human cells are functionally independent, and do not communicate through factors recognizing shared sequence elements, as suggested by studies in yeast.

Genetic approaches to the study of mitochondrial biogenesis in yeast

In contrast to most other organisms, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can survive without functional mitochondria. This ability has been exploited in genetic approaches to the study of mitochondrial biogenesis. In the last two decades, mitochondrial genetics have made major contributions to the identification of genes on the mitochondrial genome, the mapping of these genes and the establishment of structure-function relationships in the products they encode. In parallel, more than 200 complementation groups, corresponding to as many nuclear genes necessary for mitochondrial function or biogenesis have been described. Many of the latter are required for post-transcriptional events in mitochondrial gene expression, including the processing of mitochondrial pre-RNAs, the translation of mitochondrial mRNAs, or the assembly of mitochondrial translation products into the membrane. The aim of this review is to describe the genetic approaches used to unravel the intricacies of mitochondrial biogenesis and to summarize recent insights gained from their application.

Molecular analysis of the mitochondrial transcription factor mtf2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The nuclear gene for a new mitochondrial transcription factor (mtf2) was isolated by transformation of mutant pet-ts3504. It was localized on a 6.4 kb fragment of yeast genomic DNA by subcloning and complementation tests. Sequencing of a 1.7 kb DNA fragment revealed an open reading frame of 1320 bp. A transcript of 1400 nucleotides can be assigned to this region. Gene disruption of this reading frame in a wild-type yeast strain created a stable pet phenotype. Further analysis of this insertion mutation showed that it is allelic to the mutated gene of pet-ts3504. Comparison of the 5' upstream regions of MTF2 and a previously characterized mitochondrial transcription factor (MTF1) revealed common sequence motifs which may be important for coordinated regulation of gene expression.

Mitochondrial rRNA-containing petite strains of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) show a normal nuclear-mitochondrial stringent response

The nuclear-mitochondrial stringent response was examined in isonuclear rho+, 21S rRNA-containing rho-, and rho o strains of S. cerevisiae. By 30 min after nutritional downshift, nuclear rDNA transcription falls to 15% of control levels congruently in all strains, as assayed via whole-cell RNA or by hybrid selection of specific double-labeled transcripts. Both in vivo and in vitro, the mitochondrial stringent response is identical between the rho- strain and its parental rho+ strain, and in both, the kinetics and magnitude of the organellar response mirror those of the nuclear response. The data show that mitochondrial transcription and protein synthesis are not required for stringent regulation of either nuclear or mitochondrial rDNA transcription.

Mutations in the genes for mitochondrial RNA polymerase and a second mitochondrial transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In our previous work (Lisowsky et al. 1987; Lisowsky and Michaelis 1988) we have identified two nuclear pet genes of yeast that are required for mitochondrial transcription. In this report we show that one of these pet mutations, pet-ts798, maps in the RP041 gene encoding mitochondrial RNA polymerase. The temperature-sensitive lesion of mutant pet-ts798 can be suppressed by a second nuclear gene RF1023 (mtf1) when inserted into a high copy number plasmid. Our assumption that mtf1 codes for a 40 kDa mitochondrial transciription factor is supported by the fact that the cloned gene acts as an intergenic suppressor of a temperature-sensitive RNA polymerase mutant. A third nuclear gene (mtf2) for mitochondrial transcription was identified by analysing mutant pet-ts3504. The in vitro transcriptional activity of isolated mutant mitochondria is temperature sensitive suggesting the presence of an altered component of transcription inside mitochondria. The defect was confirmed by studies with a transcriptionally active DNA-protein complex and by testing the DNA-binding ability of mitochondrial proteins.