Transcription, nucleosome stability, and DNA repair in a yeast minichromosome

A half century of exploring DNA excision repair in chromatin

DNA in eukaryotic cells is packaged into the compact and dynamic structure of chromatin. This packaging is a double-edged sword for DNA repair and genomic stability. Chromatin restricts the access of repair proteins to DNA lesions embedded in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures. However, chromatin also serves as a signaling platform in which post-translational modifications of histones and other chromatin-bound proteins promote lesion recognition and repair. Similarly, chromatin modulates the formation of DNA damage, promoting or suppressing lesion formation depending on the chromatin context. Therefore, the modulation of DNA damage and its repair in chromatin is crucial to our understanding of the fate of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic lesions in DNA. Here, we survey many of the landmark findings on DNA damage and repair in chromatin over the last 50 years (i.e., since the beginning of this field), focusing on excision repair, the first repair mechanism studied in the chromatin landscape. For example, we highlight how the impact of chromatin on these processes explains the distinct patterns of somatic mutations observed in cancer genomes.

RNA Polymerase-I-Dependent Transcription-coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair of UV-Induced DNA Lesions at Transcription Termination Sites, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

If not repaired, ultraviolet light-induced DNA damage can lead to genome instability. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV photoproducts is generally fast in the coding region of genes, where RNA polymerase-II (RNAP2) arrest at damage sites and trigger transcription-coupled NER (TC-NER). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, there is RNA polymerase-I (RNAP1)-dependent TC-NER, but this process remains elusive. Therefore, we wished to characterize TC-NER efficiency in different regions of the rDNA locus: where RNAP1 are present at high density and start transcription elongation, where the elongation rate is slow, and in the transcription terminator where RNAP1 pause, accumulate and then are released. The Rpa12 subunit of RNAP1 and the Nsi1 protein participate in transcription termination, and NER efficiency was compared between wild type and cells lacking Rpa12 or Nsi1. The presence of RNAP1 was determined by chromatin endogenous cleavage and chromatin immunoprecipitation, and repair was followed at nucleotide precision with an assay that is based on the blockage of Taq polymerase by UV photoproducts. We describe that TC-NER, which is modulated by the RNAP1 level and elongation rate, ends at the 35S rRNA gene transcription termination site.

Nucleosome positioning, nucleotide excision repair and photoreactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The position of nucleosomes on DNA participates in gene regulation and DNA replication. Nucleosomes can be repressors by limiting access of factors to regulatory sequences, or activators by facilitating binding of factors to exposed DNA sequences on the surface of the core histones. The formation of UV induced DNA lesions, like cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), is modulated by DNA bending around the core histones. Since CPDs are removed by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photolyase repair, it is of paramount importance to understand how DNA damage and repair are tempered by the position of nucleosomes. In vitro, nucleosomes inhibit NER and photolyase repair. In vivo, nucleosomes slow down NER and considerably obstruct photoreactivation of CPDs. However, over-expression of photolyase allows repair of nucleosomal DNA in a second time scale. It is proposed that the intrinsic abilities of nucleosomes to move and transiently unwrap could facilitate damage recognition and repair in nucleosomal DNA.

Functionally distinct nucleosome-free regions in yeast require Rad7 and Rad16 for nucleotide excision repair

In yeast, Rad7 and Rad16 are two proteins required for nucleotide excision repair (NER) of non-transcribed chromatin. They have roles in damage recognition, in the postincision steps of NER, and in ultraviolet-light-dependent histone H3 acetylation. Moreover, Rad16 is an ATP-ase of the SNF2 superfamily and therefore might facilitate chromatin repair by nucleosome remodelling. Here, we used yeast rad7 Delta rad16 Delta mutants and show that Rad7-Rad16 is also required for NER of UV-lesions in three functionally distinct nucleosome-free regions (NFRs), the promoter and 3'-end of the URA3 gene and the ARS1 origin of replication. Moreover, rapid repair of UV-lesions by photolyase confirmed that nucleosomes were absent and that neither UV-damage formation nor rad7 Delta rad16 Delta mutations altered chromatin accessibility in NFRs. The data are consistent with a role of Rad7-Rad16 in damage recognition and processing in absence of nucleosomes. An additional role in nucleosome remodelling is discussed.

Repair of UV lesions in nucleosomes--intrinsic properties and remodeling

Nucleotide excision repair and reversal of pyrimidine dimers by photolyase (photoreactivation) are two major pathways to remove UV-lesions from DNA. Here, it is discussed how lesions are recognized and removed when the DNA is condensed into nucleosomes. During the recent years it was shown that nucleosomes inhibit photolyase and excision repair in vitro and slow down repair in vivo. The correlation of DNA-repair rates with nucleosome positions in yeast suggests that intrinsic properties of nucleosomes such as mobility and transient unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA facilitate damage recognition. Moreover, it was shown that nucleosome remodeling activities can act on UV-damaged DNA in vitro and facilitate repair suggesting that random remodeling of chromatin might contribute to damage recognition in vivo. Recent work on nucleosome structure and mobility is included to evaluate how nucleosomes accommodate DNA lesions and how nucleosome mobility and remodeling can take place on damaged DNA.

Nucleotide excision repair in chromatin and the right of entry

DNA is packaged with histones and other accessory proteins into chromatin in eukaryotic cells. It is well established that the assembly of DNA into chromatin affects induction of DNA damage as well as repair of the damage. How the DNA repair machinery detects a lesion and 'fixes it' in chromatin has been an intriguing question since the dawn of understanding DNA packaging in chromatin. Direct recognition/binding by damaged DNA binding proteins is one obvious tactic to detect a lesion. Rearrangement of chromatin structure during DNA repair was reported more than two decades ago. This early observation suggests that unfolding of chromatin structure may be required to facilitate DNA repair after lesions are detected. Cells can also exploit DNA processing events to assist DNA repair. Transcription coupled repair (TCR) is such an example. During TCR, an RNA polymerase blocked by a lesion, may act as a signal to recruit DNA repair machinery. Possible roles of histone modification enzymes, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes and chromatin assembly factors in DNA repair are discussed.

Rapid accessibility of nucleosomal DNA in yeast on a second time scale

Packaging DNA in nucleosomes and higher-order chromatin structures restricts its accessibility and constitutes a barrier for all DNA transactions including gene regulation and DNA repair. How and how fast proteins find access to DNA buried in chromatin of living cells is poorly understood. To address this question in a real time in vivo approach, we investigated DNA repair by photolyase in yeast. We show that overexpressed photolyase, a light-dependent DNA-repair enzyme, recognizes and repairs UV-damaged DNA within seconds. Rapid repair was observed in various nucleosomal regions of the genome including inactive and active genes and repressed promoters. About 50% of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers were removed in 5 s, >80% in 90 s. Heterochromatin was repaired within minutes, centromeres were not repaired. Consistent with fast conformational transitions of nucleosomes observed in vitro, this rapid repair strongly suggests that spontaneous unwrapping of nucleosomes rather than histone dissociation or chromatin remodeling provides DNA access. The data impact our view on the repressive and dynamic nature of chromatin and illustrate how proteins like photolyase can access DNA in structurally and functionally diverse chromatin regions.

Accommodation and repair of a UV photoproduct in DNA at different rotational settings on the nucleosome surface

Cyclobutane-thymine dimers (CTDs), the most common DNA lesion induced by UV radiation, cause 30 degrees bending and 9 degrees unwinding of the DNA helix. We prepared site-specific CTDs within a short sequence bracketed by strong nucleosome-positioning sequences. The rotational setting of CTDs over one turn of the helix near the dyad center on the histone surface was analyzed by hydroxyl radical footprinting. Surprisingly, the position of CTDs over one turn of the helix does not affect the rotational setting of DNA on the nucleosome surface. Gel-shift analysis indicates that one CTD destabilizes histone-DNA interactions by 0.6 or 1.1 kJ/mol when facing away or toward the histone surface, respectively. Thus, 0.5 kJ/mol energy penalty for a buried CTD is not enough to change the rotational setting of sequences with strong rotational preference. The effect of rotational setting on CTD removal by nucleotide excision repair (NER) was examined using Xenopus oocyte nuclear extracts. The NER rates are only 2-3 times lower in nucleosomes and change by only 1.5-fold when CTDs face away or toward the histone surface. Therefore, in Xenopus nuclear extracts, the rotational orientation of CTDs on nucleosomes has surprisingly little effect on rates of repair. These results indicate that nucleosome dynamics and/or chromatin remodeling may facilitate NER in gaining access to DNA damage in nucleosomes.

Nucleotide excision repair in a constitutive and inducible gene of a yeast minichromosome in intact cells

Repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) was measured in a yeast minichromosome, having a galactose-inducible GAL1:URA3 fusion gene, a constitutively expressed HIS3 gene and varied regions of chromatin structure. Transcription of GAL1:URA3 increased >150-fold, while HIS3 expression decreased <2-fold when cells were switched from glucose to galactose medium. Following galactose induction, four nucleosomes were displaced or rearranged in the GAL3-GAL10 region. However, no change in nucleosome arrangement was observed in other regions of the minichromosome following induction, indicating that only a few plasmid molecules actively transcribe at any one time. Repair at 269 cis-syn CPD sites revealed moderate preferential repair of the transcribed strand of GAL1:URA3 in galactose, consistent with transcription-coupled repair in a fraction of these genes. Many sites upstream of the transcription start site in the transcribed strand were also repaired faster upon induction. There is remarkable repair heterogeneity in the HIS3 gene and preferential repair is seen only in a short sequence immediately downstream of the transcription start site. Finally, a mild correlation of repair heterogeneity with nucleosome positions was observed in the transcribed strand of the inactive GAL1:URA3 gene and this correlation was abolished upon galactose induction.

Modulation of DNA damage and DNA repair in chromatin

DNA is packaged in the highly compact and dynamic structure of chromatin in eukaryotic cells. It is generally accepted that DNA processing events in the nucleus, such as transcription, replication, recombination, and repair, are restricted by this packaging. For some processes (e.g., transcription), the chromatin fiber is "preset" in a more open structure to allow access of proteins to specific regions of DNA within this structural hierarchy. These regions contain modified nucleosomes that accommodate a less compact state of chromatin and allow access to specific regions of DNA. DNA repair proteins, however, must access DNA lesions in all structural domains of chromatin after sudden insult to the genome. Damaged DNA must be recognized, removed, and replaced by repair enzymes at all levels of chromatin packaging. Therefore, the modulation of DNA damage and its repair in chromatin is crucial to our understanding of the fate of potential mutagenic and carcinogenic lesions in DNA. In this review, we discuss the modulation of DNA damage and DNA repair by chromatin structure, and the modulation of chromatin structure by these events.

The RAD5 gene product is involved in the avoidance of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In wild-type yeast, the repair of a 169 bp double-strand gap induced by the restriction enzymes ApaI and NcoI in the URA3gene of the shuttle vector YpJA18 occurs with high fidelity according to the homologous chromosomal sequence. In contrast, only 25% of the cells of rad5-7 and rad5 Delta mutants perform correct gap repair. As has been proven by sequencing of the junction sites, the remaining cells recircularise the gapped plasmids by joining of the non-compatible, non-homologous ends. Thus, regarding the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, the rad5 mutants behave like mammalian cells rather than budding yeast. The majority of the end joined plasmids miss either one or both of the 3'and 5'protruding single-strands of the restriction ends completely and have undergone blunt-end ligation accompanied by fill-in DNA synthesis. These results imply an important role for the Rad5 protein (Rad5p) in the protection of protruding single-strand ends and for the avoidance of non-homologous end joining during repair of double-strand gaps in budding yeast. Alternatively, the Rad5p may be an accessory factor increasing the efficiency of homologous recombination in yeast, however, the molecular mechanism of Rad5p function requires further investigation.

Preferential inhibition of nucleosome assembly by ultraviolet-induced (6-4)photoproducts

We reconstituted nucleosomes in vitro using two kinds of damaged pBR322 plasmid DNA carrying cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) or (6-4)photoproducts. The results indicate that nucleosome assembly is inhibited preferentially by (6-4)photoproducts compared with CPD, suggesting that the regions carrying (6-4)photoproducts retain their nucleosome-free form, i.e. linker-like conformation until completion of the repair processes.

Variations in transcription-repair coupling in mouse cells

Formation and repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) was examined in three different genes in mouse L cells: 1) a stably integrated insert (called LTL), consisting of a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (tk) fused to a hormone inducible promotor (LTR); 2) the constitutively expressed proto-oncogene c-abl; and 3) the inactive immunoglobulin J chain gene. Transcription of the tk gene is induced > 50-fold by dexamethasone. There is a nonuniform distribution of CPDs in LTL DNA irradiated in vitro, being 4-fold higher in the LTR than in the tk gene, indicating the LTR may be damaged preferentially in irradiated cells. Repair of CPDs occurs efficiently in both strands of LTL and is unaffected by hormone induction of tk gene transcription. Transcription of tk mRNA is very sensitive to UV damage and follows single hit kinetics with UV dose. Furthermore, tk mRNA expression rapidly recovers during repair incubation. Transcription-coupled repair occurs in these cells, however, since only the transcribed strand of c-abl is efficiently repaired of CPDs; the non-transcribed strand as well as both strands of the J chain gene are inefficiently repaired. Thus, repair in the LTL construct may reflect a lack of transcription-coupled repair in either the LTR promotor or the LTL insertion region of chromatin.

Excision of cyclobutane dimers in genomic and episomal DNA in human cells

Direct determination has been made of cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimer induction and excision repair in an episomal SV40 DNA population in vivo. Maintaining SV40-transformed human (GM637) cells in confluent culture results in amplification of a mutant SV40 episome to high copy number. T4 endonuclease V was used to quantify the induction and repair of cyclobutane dimers in the SV40 episome and genomic DNA of the same cells. Differences in both parameters were observed; cyclobutane dimers were induced at 1.5-2-fold greater frequency in episomal DNA and excised at a reduced rate compared to genomic DNA in the host cells.

The effects of ultraviolet C on in vitro nucleosome assembly and stability

The effects of ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation on nucleosome assembly and its stability were investigated quantitatively using an in vitro nucleosome assembly system comprising a plasmid DNA of pBR322 and core histones isolated from rat ascites hepatoma cells. Nucleosomal formation was estimated by analyzing the resulting DNA supercoils. When UVC-irradiated (3000 J/m2) DNA was used as a substrate for the nucleosome assembly system, the nucleosomal formation efficiency was reduced by half compared with nonirradiated DNA. On the other hand, when the reconstituted nucleosomes (minichromosomes) on the nonirradiated DNA were irradiated with UVC (3000 J/m2), about half each were disrupted and retained. These results indicate that it is difficult for UV-damaged DNA regions to supercoil around the histone octamers to form nucleosomes and that the histone octamers in the UV-damaged nucleosomes tend to be dissociated from DNA.

Fine tuning of DNA repair in transcribed genes: mechanisms, prevalence and consequences

Cells fine-tune their DNA repair, selecting some regions of the genome in preference to others. In the paradigm case, excision of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mammalian cells, repair is concentrated in transcribed genes, especially in the transcribed strand. This is due both to chromatin structure being looser in transcribing domains, allowing more rapid repair, and to repair enzymes being coupled to RNA polymerases stalled at damage sites; possibly other factors are also involved. Some repair-defective diseases may involve repair-transcription coupling: three candidate genes have been suggested. However, preferential excision of pyrimidine dimers is not uniformly linked to transcription. In mammals it varies with species, and with cell differentiation. In Drosophila embryo cells it is absent, and in yeast, the determining factor is nucleosome stability rather than transcription. Repair of other damage departs further from the paradigm, even in some UV-mimetic lesions. No selectivity is known for repair of the very frequent minor forms of base damage. And the most interesting consequence of selective repair, selective mutagenesis, normally occurs for UV-induced, but not for spontaneous mutations. The temptation to extrapolate from mammalian UV repair should be resisted.

Cis and trans mechanisms of DNA repair

DNA repair is essential for genetic stability and variability. Remarkable advances in the understanding of DNA repair by the molecular analysis of the substrate (gene repair) or the enzyme (repair genes), emphasize evolutionary conservation. Recent progress also stresses the interaction(s) between DNA repair and numerous other cellular metabolic processes, including non-nuclear and/or non-genetic responses.