The structure of the RNA binding site of ribosomal proteins S8 and S15

Interdependencies govern multidomain architecture in ribosomal small subunit assembly

The 30S subunit is composed of four structural domains, the body, platform, head, and penultimate/ultimate stems. The functional integrity of the 30S subunit is dependent upon appropriate assembly and precise orientation of all four domains. We examined 16S rRNA conformational changes during in vitro assembly using directed hydroxyl radical probing mediated by Fe(II)-derivatized ribosomal protein (r-protein) S8. R-protein S8 binds the central domain of 16S rRNA directly and independently and its iron derivatized substituents have been shown to mediate cleavage in three domains of 16S rRNA, thus making it an ideal probe to monitor multidomain orientation during assembly. Cleavages in minimal ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles formed with Fe(II)-S8 and 16S rRNA alone were compared with that in the context of the fully assembled subunit. The minimal binding site of S8 at helix 21 exists in a structure similar to that observed in the mature subunit, in the absence of other r-proteins. However, the binding site of S8 at the junction of helices 25-26a, which is transcribed after helix 21, is cleaved with differing intensities in the presence and absence of other r-proteins. Also, assembly of the body helps establish an architecture approximating, but perhaps not identical, to the 30S subunit at helix 12 and the 5' terminus. Moreover, the assembly or orientation of the neck is dependent upon assembly of both the head and the body. Thus, a complex interrelationship is observed between assembly events of independent domains and the incorporation of primary binding proteins during 30S subunit formation.

The binding interface between Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 and its 5'-translational operator mRNA

The Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 (BS15) binds a purine-rich three-helix junction motif in the central domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) as well as a translational operator located in the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of its cognate messenger RNA (mRNA). An in-frame fusion between the 5'-UTR of the BS15 gene and beta-galactosidase (lacZ) was prepared, and tested for BS15-dependent translational repression of lacZ activity in Escherichia coli. The presence of BS15 in trans represses lacZ activity 24-fold. A series of detailed point mutations in BS15 were tested for their effects upon translational repression of lacZ activity. These point mutations demonstrated that the 5'-UTR-BS15 binding interface utilizes many of the same conserved amino acid residues implicated in the binding of BS15 to 16S rRNA. The data demonstrate that the S15 protein can bind to an RNA target motif based primarily upon appropriate minor groove and sugar-phosphate backbone contacts, irrespective of the specific RNA sequence.

Ribosomal protein-dependent orientation of the 16 S rRNA environment of S15

Ribosomal protein S15 binds specifically to the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA (16 S rRNA) and directs the assembly of four additional proteins to this domain. The central domain of 16 S rRNA along with these five proteins form the platform of the 30 S subunit. Previously, directed hydroxyl radical probing from Fe(II)-S15 in small ribonucleoprotein complexes was used to study assembly of the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Here, this same approach was used to understand the 16 S rRNA environment of Fe(II)-S15 in 30 S subunits and to determine the ribosomal proteins that are involved in forming the mature S15-16 S rRNA environment. We have identified additional sites of Fe(II)-S15-directed cleavage in 30S subunits compared to the binary complex of Fe(II)-S15/16 S rRNA. Along with novel targets in the central domain, sites within the 5' and 3' minor domains are also cleaved. This suggests that during the course of 30S subunit assembly these elements are positioned in the vicinity of S15. Besides the previously determined role for S8, roles for S5, S6+S18, and S16 in altering the 16 S rRNA environment of S15 were established. These studies reveal that ribosomal proteins can alter the assembly of regions of the 30 S subunit from a considerable distance and influence the overall conformation of this ribonucleoprotein particle.

Assembly of the central domain of the 30S ribosomal subunit: roles for the primary binding ribosomal proteins S15 and S8

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit occurs in a highly ordered and sequential manner. The ordered addition of ribosomal proteins to the growing ribonucleoprotein particle is initiated by the association of primary binding proteins. These proteins bind specifically and independently to 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Two primary binding proteins, S8 and S15, interact exclusively with the central domain of 16S rRNA. Binding of S15 to the central domain results in a conformational change in the RNA and is followed by the ordered assembly of the S6/S18 dimer, S11 and finally S21 to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In contrast, S8 is not part of this major platform assembly branch. Of the remaining central domain binding proteins, only S21 association is slightly dependent on S8. Thus, although S8 is a primary binding protein that extensively contacts the central domain, its role in assembly of this domain remains unclear. Here, we used directed hydroxyl radical probing from four unique positions on S15 to assess organization of the central domain of 16S rRNA as a consequence of S8 association. Hydroxyl radical probing of Fe(II)-S15/16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S15/S8/16S rRNA ribonucleoprotein particles reveal changes in the 16S rRNA environment of S15 upon addition of S8. These changes occur predominantly in helices 24 and 26 near previously identified S8 binding sites. These S8-dependent conformational changes are consistent with 16S rRNA folding in complete 30S subunits. Thus, while S8 binding is not absolutely required for assembly of the platform, it appears to affect significantly the 16S rRNA environment of S15 by influencing central domain organization.

Structure and dynamics of ribosomal RNA

Over the past two years, progress in X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy and electron microscopy has begun to reveal the complex structure of the RNA within the ribosome. The structures of ribosomal proteins L11 and S15, among others, show how RNA-protein interactions organize the conformation of the junctions between ribosomal RNA helices. Genetic and biochemical methods have also identified a three base-pair switch within the 16S rRNA that is linked to mRNA decoding.

Conformational variability of the N-terminal helix in the structure of ribosomal protein S15

BACKGROUND

Ribosomal protein S15 is a primary RNA-binding protein that binds to the central domain of 16S rRNA. S15 also regulates its own synthesis by binding to its own mRNA. The binding sites for S15 on both mRNA and rRNA have been narrowed down to less than a hundred nucleotides each, making the protein an attractive candidate for the study of protein-RNA interactions.

RESULTS

The crystal structure of S15 from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been solved to 2.1 A resolution. The structure consists of four alpha helices. Three of these helices form the core of the protein, while the N-terminal helix protrudes out from the body of the molecule to make contacts with a neighboring molecule in the crystal lattice. S15 contains a large conserved patch of basic residues which could provide a site for binding 16S rRNA.

CONCLUSIONS

The conformation of the N-terminal alpha helix is quite different from that reported in a recent NMR structure of S15 from Thermus thermophilus. The intermolecular contacts that this alpha helix makes with a neighboring molecule in the crystal, however, closely resemble the intramolecular contacts that occur in the NMR structure. This conformational variability of the N-terminal helix has implications for the range of possible S15-RNA interactions. A large, conserved basic patch at one end of S15 and a cluster of conserved but exposed aromatic residues at the other end provide two possible RNA-binding sites on S15.

Mutagenesis of ribosomal protein S8 from Escherichia coli: defects in regulation of the spc operon

The structural features of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 that are involved in translational regulation of spc operon expression and, therefore, in its interaction with RNA have been investigated by use of a genetic approach. The rpsH gene, which encodes protein S8, was first inserted into an expression vector under the control of the lac promoter and subsequently mutagenized with methoxylamine or nitrous acid. A screening procedure based on the regulatory role of S8 was used to identify mutants that were potentially defective in their ability to associate with spc operon mRNA and, by inference, 16S mRNA. In this way, we isolated 39 variants of the S8 gene containing alterations at 34 different sites, including 37 that led to single amino acid substitutions and 2 that generated premature termination codons. As the mutations were distributed throughout the polypeptide chain, our results indicate that amino acid residues important for the structural integrity of the RNA-binding domain are not localized to a single segment. Nonetheless, the majority were located within three short sequences at the N terminus, middle, and C terminus that are phylogenetically conserved among all known eubacterial and chloroplast versions of this protein. We conclude that these sites encompass the main structural determinants required for the interaction of protein S8 with RNA.

The longest 18S ribosomal RNA ever known. Nucleotide sequence and presumed secondary structure of the 18S rRNA of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum

An EMBL4 recombinant phage which encodes one of the full length of the aphid ribosomal DNA has been isolated from the aphid genomic library. Determination of the complete nucleotide sequence of the aphid 18S rRNA gene revealed that it is 2469 bp with a G + C content of 59%. The aphid 18S rRNA gene studied here is the longest and has the highest G + C content among the 18S rRNA genes examined so far. Evidence provided by the S1 nuclease assay suggests that the aphid 18S rRNA gene examined in this study is not a pseudogene containing an insertion sequence. Based on the nucleotide sequence of the 18S rRNA gene, we constructed a presumed secondary-structure model of the aphid 18S rRNA. In the aphid 18S rRNA, the eucaryote-specific E21 and 41 region are supposed to be longer and more complex than the counterparts of other 18S rRNA.

DNA-hybridization electron microscopy. Localization of five regions of 16 S rRNA on the surface of 30 S ribosomal subunits

DNA-hybridization electron microscopy has been used to locate five regions of 16 S rRNA on the surface of 30 S ribosomal subunits. Biotinylated DNA probes that are complementary to selected regions of 16 S rRNA were hybridized to activated 30 S ribosomal subunits. These hybridized probes were reacted with avidin and localized by electron microscopy. The specificity of DNA binding was monitored with RNase H, which recognizes RNA-DNA hybrids and cleaves the RNA. Three of the five sequences examined were mapped on the platform. These sequences are 686-703, 714-733 and 787-803. Region 1492-1505 is mapped in the cleft and region 518-533 is at the neck on the side opposite the platform, respectively.

Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have derived a model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA, using interactive computer graphic methods. It is based on (1) the secondary structure derived from comparative sequence analysis, (2) the three-dimensional co-ordinates for the centers of mass of the 30 S subunit proteins, and (3) the locations of sites in 16 S rRNA that interact with specific ribosomal proteins, from footprinting and crosslinking studies. We present a detailed description of the derivation of the model. About 75% of the RNA chain is sufficiently constrained to provide a useful model. This contains most of the universally conserved core of the molecule. In all but a few instances, protected and crosslinked sites can be placed within or very close to their cognate proteins, while obeying stereochemical rules. The overall shape of the model and locations of specific regions of the RNA correspond well to data derived from electron micrographs of 30 S subunits, although such data were not used to construct the model. Phylogenetic variations in the structure are readily accommodated; as an example, we have modeled the 950-nucleotide mammalian mitochondrial 12 S rRNA by superimposing it on the E. coli structure. The three major RNA domains, as defined by secondary structure, appear to exist as autonomous structural units in three dimensions, for the most part. There is an extensive interface between the 5' and central domains, whereas the 3' major domain has relatively little apparent contact with the rest of the structure. The 5', central and 3' major domains form structures that resemble the body, platform and head, respectively, seen in electron micrographs of 30 S subunits. We discuss possible roles for the ribosomal proteins in stabilizing specific structural features of the RNA during ribosome assembly. The decoding site, as deduced from footprinting and crosslinking studies involving the tRNA anticodon stem-loop, is well-localized. Bases protected from chemical probing by the anticodon stem-loop line the cleft of the subunit. The conserved loop at position 530, which contains some of the bases protected by A site-bound tRNA, is remote (approx. 80 A) from the decoding site. Protection of these bases by the anticodon stem-loop is thus unlikely to be due to direct contact.

Interaction of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 with its binding sites in ribosomal RNA and messenger RNA

The ability of ribosomal protein S8 from Escherichia coli to interact with 12 variants of its 16 S rRNA binding site, as well as with a regulatory sequence within spc operon mRNA, has been assessed. Single-site alterations were introduced into the appropriate segment of the E. coli 16 S rRNA gene by mutagenesis in vitro. Their effects on S8-rRNA interaction were measured via a filter-binding assay, utilizing S8 binding sites transcribed in vitro from the altered 16 S rRNA gene fragments. Of the 12 rRNA mutants, six were unable to bind S8. Significantly, five of these occur within a small, phylogenetically conserved internal loop, defined by nucleotides 596-597 and 641-643, suggesting that this structure plays a major role in S8-16 S rRNA recognition. The reduced affinity of S8 for its binding site in these cases was closely correlated with growth defects that resulted from expression of the same mutations in vivo. Alterations at other positions in the S8 binding site had little influence on complex formation or cell growth, as long as they did not disrupt rRNA secondary structure. The specific interaction of S8 with a segment of the spc operon mRNA containing a putative site of translational feedback regulation was demonstrated using appropriate in vitro transcripts in conjunction with the filter-binding assay. The apparent association constant for the S8-mRNA interaction was determined to be approximately 5 x 10(6) M-1, about five times lower than for the interaction of S8 with wild-type 16 S rRNA. The structure of the regulatory binding site, determined by sequence analysis of spc operon mRNA protected by S8 from RNase digestion, was found to contain all of the characteristic features of the 16 S rRNA binding site, demonstrating that the protein associates with structurally similar domains in both RNAs.

Interaction of ribosomal proteins, S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have constructed complexes of ribosomal proteins S8, S15, S8 + S15 and S8 + S15 + S6 + S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA, and probed the RNA moiety with a set of structure-specific chemical and enzymatic probes. Our results show the following effects of assembly of proteins on the reactivity of specific nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. (1) In agreement with earlier work, S8 protects nucleotides in and around the 588-606/632-651 stem from attack by chemical probes; this is supported by protection in and around these same regions from nucleases. In addition, we observe protection of positions 573-575, 583, 812, 858-861 and 865. Several S8-dependent enhancements of reactivity are found, indicating that assembly of this protein is accompanied by conformational changes in 16 S rRNA. These results imply that protein S8 influences a much larger region of the central domain than was previously suspected. (2) Protein S15 protects nucleotides in the 655-672/734-751 stem, in agreement with previous findings. We also find S15-dependent protection of nucleotides in the 724-730 region. Assembly of S15 causes several enhancements of reactivity, the most striking of which are found at G664, A665, G674, and A718. (3) The effects of proteins S6 and S18 are dependent on the simultaneous presence of both proteins, and on the presence of protein S15. S6 + S18-dependent protections are located in the 673-730 and 777-803 regions. We observed some variability in our results with these proteins, depending on the ratio of protein to RNA used, and in different trials using enzymatic probes, possibly due to the limited solubility of protein S18. Consistently reproducible was protection of nucleotides in the 664-676 and 715-729 regions. Among the latter are three of the nucleotides (G664, G674 and A718) that are strongly enhanced by assembly of protein S15. This result suggests that an S15-induced conformational change involving these nucleotides may play a role in the co-operative assembly of proteins S6 and S18.

Comparison of active and inactive forms of the E. coli 30S ribosomal subunits

Dissociation of E. Coli 70S ribosomes in the presence of 0.1 mM Mg++ yields partially inactivated 30S and 50S subunits. This inactivation can be avoided by dissociating the 70S ribosome in a medium containing 10 mM Mg++. 400 mM Na+. Comparison of the active and inactive forms of the 30S and 50S subunits has led to the following conclusions: 1) The two forms possess identical (50S subunits) or very similar (30S subunits) hydrodynamic properties. No differences in their morphologies is detectable by electron microscopy. 2) They possess the same protein compositions except for the presence of a larger amount of protein S1 in the inactive than in the active form of the 30S subunit. 3) They differ significantly in functional properties: more efficient association of the active than of the inactive forms with the complementary subunit; extensive dimerization of inactive 30S subunits in the presence of 10 mM Mg++; no dimerization of active 30S subunits under the same conditions; six-fold higher peptidyl transferase activity of active as compared to inactive 50S subunits.

Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits using primer extension

We have investigated in detail the higher-order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA, both in its naked form and in 30 S ribosomal subunits. Each base in the 16 S rRNA chain has been probed using kethoxal (which reacts with guanine at N1 and N2), dimethylsulfate (which reacts with adenine at N1 and cytosine at N3) and 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)-carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (which reacts with uracil at N3 and guanine at N1). The sites of reaction were identified by primer extension with reverse transcriptase using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide primers. These results provide a detailed and rigorous experimental test of a model for 16 S rRNA secondary structure, which was derived mainly from comparative sequence analysis. Our data also provide information relevant to tertiary and quaternary structure of 16 S rRNA. Data obtained with naked 16 S rRNA show reasonably close agreement with the proposed model, and data obtained with 30 S subunits show nearly complete agreement. Apart from an apparent overall "tightening" of the structure (in which many weakly reactive bases become unreactive), assembly of the proteins with 16 S rRNA to form 30 S subunits brings about numerous local structural rearrangements, resulting in specific enhancements as well as protections. In many instances, the ribosomal proteins appear to "tune" the 16 S rRNA structure to bring it into accordance with the phylogenetically predicted model, even though the RNA on its own often seems to prefer a different structure in certain regions of the molecule. Extensive protection of conserved, unpaired adenines upon formation of 30 S subunits suggests that they play a special role in the assembly process, possibly providing signals for protein recognition.

Unbalanced rRNA gene dosage and its effects on rRNA and ribosomal-protein synthesis

The synthesis of rRNA was unbalanced by the introduction of plasmids containing rRNA operons with large internal deletions. Significant unbalanced synthesis was achieved only when the deletions affected both 16S and 23S RNA genes or when the deletions affected the 23S RNA gene alone. Although large imbalances in rRNA synthesis resulted from deletions affecting 16S and 23S RNA genes or only 23S RNA genes, excess 16S RNA and defective rRNA species were rapidly degraded. Large imbalances in the synthesis of regions of rRNA did not result in significantly unbalanced synthesis of ribosomal proteins. It therefore is probable that excess intact 16S RNA is degraded because ribosomal proteins are not available for packaging the RNA into ribosomes. Defective RNA species also may be degraded for this reason or because proper ribosome assembly is prevented by the defects in RNA structure. We propose two possible explanations for the finding that unbalanced overproduction of binding sites for feedback ribosomal protein does not result in significant unbalanced translational feedback depression of ribosomal protein mRNAs.

Three-dimensional arrangement of the Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA

A model for the arrangement of the Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA in the 30 S ribosomal subunit is given. This model is based on the 16 S ribosomal RNA secondary structure, intramolecular RNA crosslinking results, protein-RNA interactions, and the locations of proteins within the 30 S subunit. These considerations allow placement of most of the RNA helices in approximate positions. The overall shape (that of an asymmetric Y) is very reminiscent of the description of the shape of the RNA made by direct determinations and is reasonably correlated to the appearance of the 30 S subunit. The identities of the three major secondary-structure domains of the 16 S ribosomal RNA are, for the most part, preserved. In addition, many close contacts between the 5' and middle RNA domains occur in the body of the particle. The 3'-terminal domain is situated in the central part of the model. This position corresponds to the region between the head and the platform structure in the 30 S subunit. The regions that represent the general locations of the messenger RNA and transfer RNA binding sites can be identified in the model.

The sequence of 16S rRNA from Mycoplasma strain PG50

The DNA sequence of one of the 16S rRNA genes (cistron rrnA) of Mycoplasma strain PG50 was determined. It is 1523 bp long and has about 70% homology to the sequence of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA (rrnB). The G + C content of the sequence is 48% compared with 56% G + C in the E. coli sequence. The secondary structure is formed and it is determined that most of the differences between the two sequences are seen in stems while loops in the secondary structure are conserved. A detailed description of differences and similarities to known sequences and rRNA oligonucleotide catalogues is given, and this information is used to discuss functional properties and phylogenetic relations of mycoplasma 16S rRNA.

Chemical probing of conformation in large RNA molecules. Analysis of 16 S ribosomal RNA using diethylpyrocarbonate

Peattie & Gilbert (1980) have described an accurate and rapid gel method for assessing conformation of individual nucleotides in RNA, based on chemical modification of bases and aniline-induced strand scission. In order to extend this approach to analysis of large RNA molecules, we introduce the use of hybridization of modified RNA with DNA restriction fragments to generate RNA fragments of defined length. In principle, this permits chemical probing of conformation at any position of any RNA molecule for which a cloned DNA coding sequence is available. To illustrate the utility of this method, we use diethylpyrocarbonate to probe the reactivities of adenine residues in Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA under "native" (80 mM-potassium cacodylate (pH 7.0), 20 mM-MgCl2, 300 mM-KCl) and "quasi-secondary" (80 mM-potassium cacodylate (pH 7.0), 1 mM-EDTA) conditions. This study shows that: (1) there is generally good agreement between diethylpyrocarbonate reactivities of adenine residues in naked 16 S rRNA and a secondary structure model based on comparative sequence analysis; of 309 adenine residues probed under native conditions, only four strongly reactive residues are found in helices in the model. (2) Candidates for possible tertiary interactions are identified as adenine residues that are unpaired in the model and unreactive toward diethylpyrocarbonate under native conditions but reactive under quasi-secondary conditions. (3) An unexpectedly stable structure has been identified in the region between positions 109 and 279, where many adenine residues remain unreactive even at 90 degrees C in 80 mM-potassium cacodylate, 1 mM-EDTA. This may correspond to a structural "core" that is important for early events in ribosome assembly.

Effects of site-directed mutations in the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA upon ribosomal protein binding, RNA processing and 30 S subunit assembly

Using a multicopy plasmid encoding the Escherichia coli rrnB ribosomal RNA operon and the techniques of in vitro site-directed mutagenesis, we have introduced several small alterations into the central domain of 16 S rRNA, which encompasses nucleotides 560 to 890. Four of the rRNAs studied contained deletions and one contained an insertion. The altered small ribosomal subunit rRNAs were used to investigate relationships among 16 S rRNA processing, protein-16 S rRNA interactions and assembly of the 30 S ribosomal subunit. Analysis of plasmid-coded transcripts from maxicells revealed that products from wild-type 16 S rRNA genes were fully processed and assembled into mature 30 S subunits. Under the same conditions, the processing and assembly of transcripts derived from the mutant plasmids were severely impaired. In some instances, the mutations completely blocked both processes, while in other cases rRNA maturation and ribosome assembly were retarded, but not eliminated completely. In all cases, the mutations led to the accumulation of the 17 S precursor to 16 S rRNA. The mutant 17 S rRNAs were purified and incubated with various combinations of E. coli ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18, which are known to bind to the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Ribonuclease digestion of the resulting protein-17 S rRNA complexes and fractionation of the products permitted detection of three distinct protein-RNA fragment complexes which contained S8, S8 + S15, or S6 + S8 + S15 + S18. Whereas wild-type 17 S rRNA was able to form all three of these complexes, deletion of nucleotides 693 to 721 or 822 to 874 abolished the interaction of S6 and S18, and removal of nucleotides 659 to 718 prevented the binding of S6, S15 and S18. In contrast, elimination of residue 614, or the presence of a 16-base insertion between nucleotides 614 and 615, had no significant effect on the binding of any of the four proteins tested. Together, our results demonstrate that 16 S rRNA maturation and 30 S subunit assembly are tightly coupled, and show that, in at least some cases, defects in these processes can be correlated with the inability of particular ribosomal proteins to associate with altered rRNA molecules. Moreover, we have confirmed the essentiality of certain rRNA sequences for the formation and/or stabilization of these protein-rRNA interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

The co-operative interaction of 30 S ribosomal subunit proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli was studied by (1) determining how the binding of each protein is influenced by the others and (2) characterizing a series of protein-rRNA fragment complexes. Whereas S8 and S15 are known to associate independently with the 16 S rRNA, binding of S18 depended upon S8 and S15, and binding of S6 was found to require S8, S15 and S18. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) fragments were derived from the S8-, S8/S15- and S6/S8/S15/S18-16 S rRNA complexes by partial RNase hydrolysis and isolated by electrophoresis through Mg2+-containing polyacrylamide gels or by centrifugation through sucrose gradients. Identification of the proteins associated with each RNP by gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate demonstrated the presence of S8, S8 + S15 and S6 + S8 + S15 + S18 in the corresponding fragment complexes. Analysis of the rRNA components of the RNP particles confirmed that S8 was bound to nucleotides 583 to 605 and 624 to 653, and that S8 and S15 were associated with nucleotides 583 to 605, 624 to 672 and 733 to 757. Proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 were shown to protect nucleotides 563 to 605, 624 to 680, 702 to 770, 818 to 839 and 844 to 891, which span the entire central domain of the 16 S rRNA molecule (nucleotides 560 to 890). The binding site for each protein contains helical elements as well as single-stranded internal loops ranging in size from a single bulged nucleotide to 20 bases. Three terminal loops and one stem-loop structure within the central domain of the 16 S rRNA were not protected in the four-protein complex. Interestingly, bases within or very close to these unprotected regions have been shown to be accessible to chemical and enzymatic probes in 30 S subunits but not in 70 S ribosomes. Furthermore, nucleotides adjacent to one of the unprotected loops have been cross-linked to a region near the 3' end of 16 S rRNA. Our observations and those of others suggest that the bases in this domain that are not sequestered by interactions with S6, S8, S15 or S18 play a role involved in subunit association or in tertiary interactions between portions of the rRNA chain that are distant from one-another in the primary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Electron microscopy of secondary structure in partially denatured Escherichia coli 16S rRNA and 30S subunits

Loops observed in partially denatured 16S rRNA lie within three domains, each about 500 nucleotides long. The loops observed in the 5' and central domains agree well with features of the model proposed by Woese et al. [Woese, C. R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R., & Noller, H. F. (1983) Microbiol. Rev. 47, 621-669]. The structure in the 3' domain is more complex and variable but is still consistent with the model. Published psoralen cross-linking studies have reported one of the observed loops but have also identified loops other than those observed here or predicted by any secondary structure model. These loops are stabilized by increasing concentrations of Mg2+ ions and by bound ribosomal proteins. For example, protein S4 in LiCl core particles stabilizes a loop of 370 nucleotides which forms part of its putative binding site on rRNA. The loop structures are characteristic enough to permit an overall comparison of the most stable of the predicted and observed loops in 16S and 23S rRNAs. Both rRNAs show a stable 5'-terminal loop and a set of subterminal nested loops near the 3' end.

Higher order structure in the 3'-minor domain of small subunit ribosomal RNAs from a gram negative bacterium, a gram positive bacterium and a eukaryote

An experimental approach was used to determine and compare the highest order structure within the 150 to 200 nucleotides at the 3'-ends of the RNAs from the small ribosomal subunits of Escherichia coli, Bacillus stearothermophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemical reagents were employed to establish the degree of stacking and/or accessibility of each adenosine, guanosine and cytidine. The double helices were probed with a cobra venom ribonuclease from Naja naja oxiana, and the relatively unstructured and accessible sequences were localized with the single strand-specific ribonucleases A, T1, T2 and S1. The data enabled the various minimal secondary structural models, proposed for the 3'-regions of the E. coli and S. cerevisiae RNAs, to be critically examined, and to demonstrate that the main common features of these models are correct. The results also reveal the presence and position of additional higher order structure in the renatured free RNA. It can be concluded that a high level of conservation of higher order structure has occurred during the evolution of the gram negative and gram positive eubacteria and the eukaryote in both the double helical regions and the "unstructured" regions. Several unusual structural features were detected. Multiple G X A pairings in two of the putative helices, which are compatible with phylogenetic sequence comparisons, are strongly supported by the occurrence of cobra venom ribonuclease cuts adjacent to, and in one case between, these pairings. Evidence is also provided for the stacking of an A X A pair within a double helix of the yeast RNA. Other special structural features include adenosines bulged out from double helices; such nucleotides, which are hyper-reactive, have been implicated in protein recognition in 5 S ribosomal RNA. The 3'-terminal regions of the RNAs are particularly important for the functioning of the ribosome. They are involved in mRNA, tRNA and ribosomal factor binding. The results reveal that while the functionally important RNA sequences tend to be conserved, they are not always accessible in the free RNA; the pyrimidine-rich "Shine and Dalgarno" sequence, for example, which is involved in mRNA recognition, occurs in a double helix in both eubacterial RNAs.

Structural domains of ribosomal protein S8 and their relationship to ribosomal RNA binding

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 has been subjected to mild proteolytic digestion in order to search for structural domains within the protein [1]. A characteristic fragment produced in high yield after chymotrypsin treatment has been located with the protein sequence. Circular dichroism has shown this domain to be rich in alpha helix. However, the fragment loses its ability to bind to 16S rRNA as does a similar fragment produced by trypsin cleavage. The intact protein is required for rRNA binding and is highly protected against proteolytic digestion when bound to the RNA.

Physical characteristics of the reconstitution intermediates (RI30 and RI30*) from the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli

The isolated reconstitution intermediates (RI30 and RI30*) from the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli were found to contain ten proteins. The sedimentation coefficients, diffusion coefficients, density increments, extinction coefficients, and molecular weights were determined for the reconstitution particles and compared with those obtained from the 16S rRNA under identical buffer conditions. The results show that the binding of the proteins on the 16S rRNA at 4 degrees C does not markedly affect the folding of the RNA molecule. However, upon heating the RI30 particle at 40 degrees C to form the RI30* particle, significant folding of the RNA took place, giving a structure considerably more compact than that of the 16S rRNA or the RI30 particle.

Identification of proteins at the subunit interface of the Escherichia coli ribosome by cross-linking with dimethyl 3,3'-dithiobis(propionimidate)

The 70S ribosomes of Escherichia coli were treated with dimethyl 3,3'-dithiobis(propionimidate). Under conditions where 40% of the lysine epsilon-amino groups became modified, about 50% of the ribosomes became resistant to dissociation into 30S and 50S subunits when analyzed in the absence of reducing agents on sucrose gradients containing low magnesium concentrations. Dissociation took place in the presence of reducing agents, indicating that the bifunctional reagent had reacted with proteins from both subunits. Proteins were extracted from purified cross-linked 70S ribosomes by using conditions to preclude disulfide interchange. Disulfide-linked protein complexes and non-cross-linked proteins were first fractionated by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide/urea gels at pH 5.5. The proteins from sequential slices of the urea gel were analyzed by two-dimensional diagonal polyacrylamide/sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis. Monomeric proteins derived from cross-linked dimers appeared below the diagonal of non-cross-linked proteins since the second electrophoresis but not the first is run under reducing conditions to cleave the cross-linked species. Final identification of the constituent proteins in each dimer was made by radioiodination of the cross-linked proteins, followed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide/urea gel electrophoresis in the presence of nonradioactive marker 70S protein. The identification of 11 cross-linked protein dimers which contained one protein from each of the two ribosomal subunits is described. We conclude that the proteins in these cross-linked pairs are located in the regions of contact between the two subunits, i.e., at the "subunit interface".

Secondary structure of 16S ribosomal RNA

A secondary structure model for 16S ribosomal RNA which is based on available chemical, enzymatic, and comparative sequence data shows good agreement between constraints dictated by the model and a wide variety of experimental observations. The four major structural domains created by the base-pairing scheme correspond closely to RNA fragments isolated after nuclease digestion in the presence of bound ribosomal proteins. Functionally important sites appear to be located in unpaired regions and are phylogenetically highly conserved.

Electron microscopic mapping of secondary structures in bacterial 16S and 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid and 30S precursor ribosomal ribonucleic acid

Electron microscopy revealed reproducible secondary structure patterns within partially denatured 16S and 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) from Escherichia coli. When prepared with 50% formamide-100 mM ammonium acetate, 16S rRNA included two small hairpins that appeared in over 50% of all molecules. Three open loops were observed with frequencies of less than 25%. In contrast, 23S rRNA included a terminal open loop and two additional large structures in over 75% of all molecules. These secondary structure patterns were conserved in the 16S and 23S rRNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The secondary structure of the 30S precursor rRNA from the ribonclease III-deficient E. coli mutant AB105 was mapped after partial denaturation in 70% formamide-100 mM ammonium acetate. Two large open loops were superimposed on the 16S and 23S rRNA secondary structure patterns. These loops were the most frequent structures found on the precursor, and their stems coincided with ribonuclease III cleavage sites. A tentative 5'-3 orientation was determined for the secondary structure patterns of 16S and 23S rRNA from their relative locations within 30S precursor rRNA. The relation of secondary structure to ribosomal protein binding and ribonuclease III cleavage is discussed.