Microhelix aminoacylation by a class I tRNA synthetase. Non-conserved base pairs required for specificity

Revisiting the operational RNA code for amino acids: Ensemble attributes and their implications

It has been suggested that tRNA acceptor stems specify an operational RNA code for amino acids. In the last 20 years several attributes of the putative code have been elucidated for a small number of model organisms. To gain insight about the ensemble attributes of the code, we analyzed 4925 tRNA sequences from 102 bacterial and 21 archaeal species. Here, we used a classification and regression tree (CART) methodology, and we found that the degrees of degeneracy or specificity of the RNA codes in both Archaea and Bacteria differ from those of the genetic code. We found instances of taxon-specific alternative codes, i.e., identical acceptor stem determinants encrypting different amino acids in different species, as well as instances of ambiguity, i.e., identical acceptor stem determinants encrypting two or more amino acids in the same species. When partitioning the data by class of synthetase, the degree of code ambiguity was significantly reduced. In cryptographic terms, a plausible interpretation of this result is that the class distinction in synthetases is an essential part of the decryption rules for resolving the subset of RNA code ambiguities enciphered by identical acceptor stem determinants of tRNAs acylated by enzymes belonging to the two classes. In evolutionary terms, our findings lend support to the notion that in the pre-DNA world, interactions between tRNA acceptor stems and synthetases formed the basis for the distinction between the two classes; hence, ambiguities in the ancient RNA code were pivotal for the fixation of these enzymes in the genomes of ancestral prokaryotes.

Effect of a domain-spanning disulfide on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activity

Enzymes regulated by allostery undergo conformational rearrangement upon binding effector molecules. For modular proteins, a flexible interface may mediate reorientation of the protein domains and transmit binding events to activate catalysis at a distance. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) that use tRNA anticodons as identity elements can be considered allosteric enzymes in which aminoacylation of the tRNA acceptor stem is enhanced upon anticodon binding. We reasoned that anticodon-triggered conformational change might be restricted upon introduction of a disulfide linkage near the core of an aaRS. Here we show that a double cysteine mutation engineered at the Escherichia coli MetRS domain interface spontaneously generates a disulfide linkage. This disulfide clamp has no effect on methionyl adenylate formation but reduces the level of tRNA(Met) aminoacylation approximately 2-fold. Activity is restored upon chemical reduction of the disulfide, demonstrating that E. coli MetRS requires a flexible interface domain for full catalytic efficiency.

An operational RNA code for faithful assignment of AUG triplets to methionine

The assignment of AUG codons to methionine remains a central question of the evolution of the genetic code. We have unveiled a strategy for the discrimination among tRNAs containing CAU (AUG-decoding) anticodons. Mycoplasma penetrans methionyl-tRNA synthetase can directly differentiate between tRNA(Ile)(CAU) and tRNA(Met)(CAU) transcripts (a recognition normally achieved through the modification of anticodon bases). This discrimination mechanism is based only on interactions with the acceptor stems of tRNA(Ile)(CAU) and tRNA(Met)(CAU). Thus, in certain species, the fidelity of translation of methionine codons requires a discrimination mechanism that is independent of the information contained in the anticodon.

Using molecular dynamics to map interaction networks in an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

Long-range functional communication is a hallmark of many enzymes that display allostery, or action-at-a-distance. Many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases can be considered allosteric, in that their trinucleotide anticodons bind the enzyme at a site removed from their catalytic domains. Such is the case with E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthase (MetRS), which recognizes its cognate anticodon using a conserved tryptophan residue 50 A away from the site of tRNA aminoacylation. The lack of details regarding how MetRS and tRNA(Met) interact has limited efforts to deconvolute the long-range communication that occurs in this system. We have used molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate the mobility of wild-type MetRS and a Trp-461 variant shown previously by experiment to be deficient in tRNA aminoacylation. The simulations reveal that MetRS has significant mobility, particularly at structural motifs known to be involved in catalysis. Correlated motions are observed between residues in distant structural motifs, including the active site, zinc binding motif, and anticodon binding domain. Both mobility and correlated motions decrease significantly but not uniformly upon substitution at Trp-461. Mobility of some residues is essentially abolished upon removal of Trp-461, despite being tens of Angstroms away from the site of mutation and solvent exposed. This conserved residue does not simply participate in anticodon binding, as demonstrated experimentally, but appears to mediate the protein's distribution of structural ensembles. Finally, simulations of MetRS indicate that the ligand-free protein samples conformations similar to those observed in crystal structures with substrates and substrate analogs bound. Thus, there are low energetic barriers for MetRS to achieve the substrate-bound conformations previously determined by structural methods.

Structural basis for lysidine formation by ATP pyrophosphatase accompanied by a lysine-specific loop and a tRNA-recognition domain

Lysidine, a lysine-combined modified cytidine, is exclusively located at the anticodon wobble position (position 34) of eubacterial tRNA(Ile)(2) and not only converts the codon specificity from AUG to AUA, but also converts the aminoacylation specificity from recognition by methionyl-tRNA synthetase to that by isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS). Here, we report the crystal structure of lysidine synthetase (TilS) from Aquifex aeolicus at 2.42-A resolution. TilS forms a homodimer, and each subunit consists of the N-terminal dinucleotide-binding fold domain (NTD), with a characteristic central hole, and the C-terminal globular domain (CTD) connected by a long alpha-helical linker. The NTD shares striking structural similarity with the ATP-pyrophosphatase domain of GMP synthetase, which reminds us of the two-step reaction by TilS: adenylation of C34 and lysine attack on the C2 carbon. Conserved amino acid residues are clustered around the NTD central hole. Kinetic analyses of the conserved residues' mutants indicated that C34 of tRNA(Ile)(2) is adenylated by an ATP lying across the NTD central hole and that a lysine, which is activated at a loop appended to the NTD, nucleophilically attacks the C2 carbon from the rear. Escherichia coli TilS (called MesJ) has an additional CTD, which may recognize the tRNA(Ile)(2) acceptor stem. In contrast, a mutational study revealed that A. aeolicus TilS does not recognize the tRNA acceptor stem but recognizes the C29.G41 base pair in the anticodon stem. Thus, the two TilS enzymes discriminate tRNA(Ile)(2) from tRNA(Met) by strategies similar to that used by IleRS, but in distinct manners.

Domain-domain communication in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are modular proteins, with domains that have distinct roles in the aminoacylation reaction. The catalytic core is responsible for aminoacyl adenylate formation and transfer of the amino acid to the 3' end of the bound transfer RNA (tRNA). Appended and inserted domains contact portions of the tRNA outside the acceptor site and contribute to the efficiency and specificity of aminoacylation. Some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases also have distinct editing activities that are localized to unique domains. Efficient aminoacylation and editing require communication between RNA-binding and catalytic domains, and can be considered as a signal transduction system. Here, evidence for domain-domain communication in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is summarized, together with insights from structural analysis.

Transfer RNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are an ancient group of enzymes that catalyze the covalent attachment of an amino acid to its cognate transfer RNA. The question of specificity, that is, how each synthetase selects the correct individual or isoacceptor set of tRNAs for each amino acid, has been referred to as the second genetic code. A wealth of structural, biochemical, and genetic data on this subject has accumulated over the past 40 years. Although there are now crystal structures of sixteen of the twenty synthetases from various species, there are only a few high resolution structures of synthetases complexed with cognate tRNAs. Here we review briefly the structural information available for synthetases, and focus on the structural features of tRNA that may be used for recognition. Finally, we explore in detail the insights into specific recognition gained from classical and atomic group mutagenesis experiments performed with tRNAs, tRNA fragments, and small RNAs mimicking portions of tRNAs.

Major anticodon-binding region missing from an archaebacterial tRNA synthetase

The small size of the archaebacterial Methanococcus jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase may give insights into the historical development of tRNAs and tRNA synthetases. The L-shaped tRNA has two major arms-the acceptor.TpsiC minihelix with the amino acid attachment site and the anticodon-containing arm. The structural organization of the tRNA synthetases parallels that of tRNAs. The more ancient synthetase domain contains the active site and insertions that interact with the minihelix portion of the tRNA. A second, presumably more recent, domain interacts with the anticodon-containing section of tRNA. The small size of the M. jannaschii enzyme is due to the absence of most of the second domain, including a segment thought to bind to the anticodon. Consistent with the absence of an anticodon-binding motif, a mutation of the central base of the anticodon had a relatively small effect on the aminoacylation efficiency of the M. jannaschii enzyme. In contrast, others showed earlier that the same mutation severely reduced charging by a normal-sized bacterial enzyme that has the aforementioned anticodon-binding motif. However, the M. jannaschii enzyme has a peptide insertion into its catalytic domain. This insertion is shared with all other tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases and is needed for a critical minihelix interaction. We show that the M. jannaschii enzyme is active on minihelix substrates over a wide temperature range and has preserved the same peptide-dependent minihelix specificity seen in other tyrosine enzymes. These findings are consistent with the concept that anticodon interactions of tRNA synthetases were later adaptations to the emerging synthetase-tRNA complex that was originally framed around the minihelix.

Evidence for breaking domain-domain functional communication in a synthetase-tRNA complex

We report here evidence for mutations that break domain-domain functional communication in a synthetase-tRNA complex. Each synthetase is roughly divided into two major domains that are paralleled by the two arms of the L-shaped tRNA structure. The active-site-containing domain interacts with the acceptor arm of the tRNA. The second domain frequently interacts with the anticodon-containing arm. By an induced-fit mechanism, contacts with the anticodon can activate formation of a robust transition state at a site over 70 A away. This induced-fit-based activation is thought to occur through domain-domain signaling and is seen by the enhancement of aminoacylation of the anticodon-containing full tRNA versus a substrate based on the acceptor arm alone. Here we describe a rationally designed mutant methionyl-tRNA synthetase containing two point substitutions at sites that potentially link an anticodon-binding motif to the catalytic domain. The double mutation had no effect on interactions with either the isolated acceptor arm or the anticodon stem-loop. In contrast to interactions with the separate pieces, the mutant enzyme was severely impaired for binding the native tRNA and lost much of its ability to enhance the rate of charging of the full tRNA over that of a substrate based on the acceptor arm alone. We propose that these residues are part of a network for facilitating domain-domain communication for formation of an active synthetase-tRNA complex by induced fit.

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity

Correct expression of the genetic code at translation is directly correlated with tRNA identity. This survey describes the molecular signals in tRNAs that trigger specific aminoacylations. For most tRNAs, determinants are located at the two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few tRNAs, however, major identity signals are found in the core of the molecule. Identity elements have different strengths, often depend more on k cat effects than on K m effects and exhibit additive, cooperative or anti-cooperative interplay. Most determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases, and chemical groups on bases or ribose moieties that make functional interactions have been identified in several systems. Major determinants are conserved in evolution; however, the mechanisms by which they are expressed are species dependent. Recent studies show that alternate identity sets can be recognized by a single synthetase, and emphasize the importance of tRNA architecture and anti-determinants preventing false recognition. Identity rules apply to tRNA-like molecules and to minimalist tRNAs. Knowledge of these rules allows the manipulation of identity elements and engineering of tRNAs with switched, altered or multiple specificities.

Activation of microhelix charging by localized helix destabilization

We report that aminoacylation of minimal RNA helical substrates is enhanced by mismatched or unpaired nucleotides at the first position in the helix. Previously, we demonstrated that the class I methionyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates RNA microhelices based on the acceptor stem of initiator and elongator tRNAs with greatly reduced efficiency relative to full-length tRNA substrates. The cocrystal structure of the class I glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase with tRNAGln revealed an uncoupling of the first (1.72) base pair of tRNAGln, and tRNAMet was proposed by others to have a similar base-pair uncoupling when bound to methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Because the anticodon is important for efficient charging of methionine tRNA, we thought that 1.72 distortion is probably effected by the synthetase-anticodon interaction. Small RNA substrates (minihelices, microhelices, and duplexes) are devoid of the anticodon triplet and may, therefore, be inefficiently aminoacylated because of a lack of anticodon-triggered acceptor stem distortion. To test this hypothesis, we constructed microhelices that vary in their ability to form a 1.72 base pair. The results of kinetic assays show that microhelix aminoacylation is activated by destabilization of this terminal base pair. The largest effect is seen when one of the two nucleotides of the pair is completely deleted. Activation of aminoacylation is also seen with the analogous deletion in a minihelix substrate for the closely related isoleucine enzyme. Thus, for at least the methionine and isoleucine systems, a built-in helix destabilization compensates in part for the lack of presumptive anticodon-induced acceptor stem distortion.

Evidence that specificity of microhelix charging by a class I tRNA synthetase occurs in the transition state of catalysis

Determinants for the identities of tRNAs are located in the acceptor stem and, commonly, in the anticodon as well. Although the anticodon is an important determinant for the identity of methionine tRNA, RNA microhelices whose sequences are based on the acceptor stem alone can be aminoacylated by the class I methionyl-tRNA synthetase. We show here that specific nucleotide substitutions in a microhelix significantly reduced its rate of aminoacylation. In contrast, affinity coelectrophoresis analysis showed that microhelix binding to the enzyme was not significantly affected by the same substitutions. These and additional experiments and considerations imply that specific determinants for microhelix aminoacylation are needed for orientation of the acceptor stem in the transition state of catalysis rather than for enhanced binding interactions. The effect of linking together acceptor stem interactions with those in the anticodon, as occurs in the whole tRNA molecule, was also evaluated. This analysis showed that linkage results in some of the favorable acceptor stem and anticodon interactions being used to offset the free energy cost of straining the structure of the enzyme-tRNA complex.

Acceptor stem and anticodon RNA hairpin helix interactions with glutamine tRNA synthetase

The class I glutamine (Gln) tRNA synthetase interacts with the anticodon and acceptor stem of glutamine tRNA. RNA hairpin helices were designed to probe acceptor stem and anticodon stem-loop contacts. A seven-base pair RNA microhelix derived from the acceptor stem of tRNA(Gln) was aminoacylated by Gln tRNA synthetase. Variants of the glutamine acceptor stem microhelix implicated the discriminator base as a major identity element for glutaminylation of the RNA helix. A second RNA microhelix representing the anticodon stem-loop competitively inhibited tRNA(Gln) changing. However, the anticodon stem-loop microhelix did not enhance aminoacylation of the acceptor stem microhelix. Thus, transduction of the anticodon identity signal may require covalent continuity of the tRNA chain to trigger efficient aminoacylation.