DNA substrate requirements for stable joint molecule formation by the RecA and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins of Escherichia coli

Prokaryotic DNA Crossroads: Holliday Junction Formation and Resolution

Cells are continually exposed to a multitude of internal and external stressors, which give rise to various types of DNA damage. To protect the integrity of their genetic material, cells are equipped with a repertoire of repair proteins that engage in various repair mechanisms, facilitated by intricate networks of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. Among these networks is the homologous recombination (HR) system, a molecular repair mechanism conserved in all three domains of life. On one hand, HR ensures high-fidelity, template-dependent DNA repair, while on the other hand, it results in the generation of combinatorial genetic variations through allelic exchange. Despite substantial progress in understanding this pathway in bacteria, yeast, and humans, several critical questions remain unanswered, including the molecular processes leading to the exchange of DNA segments, the coordination of protein binding, conformational switching during branch migration, and the resolution of Holliday Junctions (HJs). This Review delves into our current understanding of the HR pathway in bacteria, shedding light on the roles played by various proteins or their complexes at different stages of HR. In the first part of this Review, we provide a brief overview of the end resection processes and the strand-exchange reaction, offering a concise depiction of the mechanisms that culminate in the formation of HJs. In the latter half, we expound upon the alternative methods of branch migration and HJ resolution more comprehensively and holistically, considering the historical research timelines. Finally, when we consolidate our knowledge about HR within the broader context of genome replication and the emergence of resistant species, it becomes evident that the HR pathway is indispensable for the survival of bacteria in diverse ecological niches.

Mechanism of strand exchange from RecA-DNA synaptic and D-loop structures

The strand exchange reaction is central to homologous recombination. It is catalyzed by the RecA family of ATPases that form a helical filament with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and ATP. This filament binds to a donor double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to form synaptic filaments that search for homology, and then catalyze the exchange of the complementary strand to form a new heteroduplex, or a D-loop if homology is limited^1,2. Here we report the Cryo-EM analysis of synaptic mini filaments with both non-complementary and partially-complementary dsDNA, and structures of RecA–D-loop complexes containing a 10 or 12 base pair heteroduplex at 2.8 and 2.9 Å, respectively. The RecA C-terminal domain (CTD) binds to dsDNA and directs it to the L2 loop, which inserts into and opens the duplex. The opening propagates through RecA sequestering the homologous strand at a secondary DNA-binding site, freeing the complementary strand to sample pairing with the ssDNA. Duplex opening has a significant probability of stopping at each RecA step, with the as yet unopened dsDNA portion binding to another CTD. Homology suppresses this process through heteroduplex pairing cooperating with secondary site-ssDNA binding to extend dsDNA opening. This mechanism locally limits the length of ssDNA sampled for pairing if homology is not encountered, and it may provide for the formation of multiple synapses separated substantially on the donor dsDNA, increasing the probability of encountering homology.

A 5'-to-3' strand exchange polarity is intrinsic to RecA nucleoprotein filaments in the absence of ATP hydrolysis

RecA is essential to recombinational DNA repair in which RecA filaments mediate the homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange. Both RecA filament assembly and the subsequent DNA strand exchange are directional. Here, we demonstrate that the polarity of DNA strand exchange is embedded within RecA filaments even in the absence of ATP hydrolysis, at least over short DNA segments. Using single-molecule tethered particle motion, we show that successful strand exchange in the presence of ATP proceeds with a 5′-to-3′ polarity, as demonstrated previously. RecA filaments prepared with ATPγS also exhibit a 5′-to-3′ progress of strand exchange, suggesting that the polarity is not determined by RecA disassembly and/or ATP hydrolysis. RecAΔC17 mutants, lacking a C-terminal autoregulatory flap, also promote strand exchange in a 5′-to-3′ polarity in ATPγS, a polarity that is largely lost with this RecA variant when ATP is hydrolyzed. We propose that there is an inherent strand exchange polarity mediated by the structure of the RecA filament groove, associated by conformation changes propagated in a polar manner as DNA is progressively exchanged. ATP hydrolysis is coupled to polar strand exchange over longer distances, and its contribution to the polarity requires an intact RecA C-terminus.

A defect in homologous recombination leads to increased translesion synthesis in E. coli

DNA damage tolerance pathways allow cells to duplicate their genomes despite the presence of replication blocking lesions. Cells possess two major tolerance strategies, namely translesion synthesis (TLS) and homology directed gap repair (HDGR). TLS pathways involve specialized DNA polymerases that are able to synthesize past DNA lesions with an intrinsic risk of causing point mutations. In contrast, HDGR pathways are essentially error-free as they rely on the recovery of missing information from the sister chromatid by RecA-mediated homologous recombination. We have investigated the genetic control of pathway choice between TLS and HDGR in vivo in Escherichia coli In a strain with wild type RecA activity, the extent of TLS across replication blocking lesions is generally low while HDGR is used extensively. Interestingly, recA alleles that are partially impaired in D-loop formation confer a decrease in HDGR and a concomitant increase in TLS. Thus, partial defect of RecA's capacity to invade the homologous sister chromatid increases the lifetime of the ssDNA.RecA filament, i.e. the 'SOS signal'. This increase favors TLS by increasing both the TLS polymerase concentration and the lifetime of the TLS substrate, before it becomes sequestered by homologous recombination. In conclusion, the pathway choice between error-prone TLS and error-free HDGR is controlled by the efficiency of homologous recombination.

Real-time solution measurement of RAD51- and RecA-mediated strand assimilation without background annealing

RAD51 is the central strand exchange recombinase in somatic homologous recombination, providing genomic stability and promoting resistance to DNA damage. An important tool for mechanistic studies of RAD51 is the D-loop or strand assimilation assay, which measures the ability of RAD51-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to search for, invade and exchange ssDNA strands with a homologous duplex DNA target. As cancer cells generally overexpress RAD51, the D-loop assay has also emerged as an important tool in oncologic drug design programs for targeting RAD51. Previous studies have adapted the traditional gel-based D-loop assay by using fluorescence-based substrates, which in principle allow for use in high-throughput screening platforms. However, these existing D-loop methods depend on linear oligonucleotide DNA duplex targets, and these substrates enable recombinase-independent ssDNA annealing that can obscure the recombinase-dependent strand assimilation signal. This compelled us to fundamentally re-design this assay, using a fluorescent target substrate that consists of a covalently closed linear double-hairpin dsDNA. This new microplate-based method represents a fast, inexpensive and non-radioactive alternative to existing D-loop assays. It provides accurate kinetic analysis of strand assimilation in high-throughput and performs well with human RAD51 and Escherichia coli RecA protein. This advance will aid in both mechanistic studies of homologous recombination and drug screening programs.

RecA protein filaments disassemble in the 5' to 3' direction on single-stranded DNA

RecA protein forms filaments on both single- and double-stranded DNA. Several studies confirm that filament extension occurs in the 5' to 3' direction on single-stranded DNA. These filaments also disassemble in an end-dependent fashion, and several indirect observations suggest that the disassembly occurs on the end opposite to that at which assembly occurs. By labeling the 5' end of single-stranded DNA with a segment of duplex DNA, we demonstrate unambiguously that RecA filaments disassemble uniquely in the 5' to 3' direction.

The efficiency of strand invasion by Escherichia coli RecA is dependent upon the length and polarity of ssDNA tails

RecA protein is essential for homologous recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Escherichia coli. The protein binds DNA to form nucleoprotein filaments that promote joint molecule formation and strand exchange in vitro. RecA polymerises on ssDNA in the 5'-3' direction and catalyses strand exchange and branch migration with a 5'-3' polarity. It has been reported previously, using D-loop assays, in which ssDNA (containing a heterologous block at one end) invades supercoiled duplex DNA that 3'-homologous ends are reactive, whereas 5'-ends are inactive. This polarity bias was thought to be due to the polarity of RecA filament formation, which results in the 3'-ends being coated in RecA, whereas 5'-ends remain naked. Using a range of duplex substrates containing ssDNA tails of various lengths and polarities, we now demonstrate that when no heterologous block is imposed, 5'-ends are just as reactive as 3'-ends. Moreover, using short-tailed substrates, we find that 5'-ends form more stable D-loops than 3'-ends. This bias may be a consequence of the instability of short 3'-joints. With more physiological substrates containing long ssDNA tails, we find that RecA shows no intrinsic preference for 5' or 3'-ends and that both form D-loop complexes with high efficiency.

Binding of SSB and RecA protein to DNA-containing stem loop structures: SSB ensures the polarity of RecA polymerization on single-stranded DNA

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins play an important role in homologous pairing and strand exchange promoted by the class of RecA-like proteins. It is presumed that SSB facilitates binding of RecA on to ssDNA by melting secondary structure, but direct physical evidence for the disruption of secondary structure by either SSB or RecA is still lacking. Using a series of oligonucleotides with increasing amounts of secondary structure, we show that stem loop structures impede contiguous binding of RecA and affect the rate of ATP hydrolysis. The electrophoretic mobility shift of a ternary complex of SSB-DNA-RecA and a binary complex of SSB-DNA are similar; however, the mechanism remains obscure. Binding of RecA on to stem loop is rapid in the presence of SSB or ATPgammaS and renders the complex resistant to cleavage by HaeIII, to higher amounts of competitor DNA or low temperature. The elongation of RecA filament in a 5' to 3' direction is halted at the proximal end of the stem. Consequently, RecA nucleates at the loop and cooperative binding propagates the RecA filament down the stem causing its disruption. The pattern of modification of thymine residues in the loop region indicates that RecA monomer is the minimum binding unit. Together, these results suggest that SSB plays a novel role in ensuring the directionality of RecA polymerization across stem loop in ssDNA. These observations have fundamental implications on the role of SSB in multiple aspects of cellular DNA metabolism.

Tailed duplex DNA is the preferred substrate for Rad51 protein-mediated homologous pairing

The repair of potentially lethal DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination requires processing of the broken DNA into a resected DNA duplex with a protruding 3'-single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tail. Accordingly, the canonical models for DSB repair require invasion of an intact homologous DNA template by the 3'-end of the ssDNA, a characteristic that the bacterial pairing protein RecA possesses. Unexpectedly, we find that for the eukaryotic homolog, Rad51 protein, the 5'-end of ssDNA is more invasive than the 3'-end. This pairing bias is unaffected by Rad52, Rad54 or Rad55-57 proteins. However, further investigation reveals that, in contrast to RecA protein, the preferred DNA substrate for Rad51 protein is not ssDNA but rather dsDNA with ssDNA tails. This important distinction permits the Rad51 proteins to promote DNA strand invasion using either 3'- or 5'-ends with similar efficiency.

Recombinational DNA repair in bacteria and the RecA protein

In bacteria, the major function of homologous genetic recombination is recombinational DNA repair. This is not a process reserved only for rare double-strand breaks caused by ionizing radiation, nor is it limited to situations in which the SOS response has been induced. Recombinational DNA repair in bacteria is closely tied to the cellular replication systems, and it functions to repair damage at stalled replication forks, Studies with a variety of rec mutants, carried out under normal aerobic growth conditions, consistently suggest that at least 10-30% of all replication forks originating at the bacterial origin of replication are halted by DNA damage and must undergo recombinational DNA repair. The actual frequency may be much higher. Recombinational DNA repair is both the most complex and the least understood of bacterial DNA repair processes. When replication forks encounter a DNA lesion or strand break, repair is mediated by an adaptable set of pathways encompassing most of the enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. There are five separate enzymatic processes involved in these repair events: (1) The replication fork assembled at OriC stalls and/or collapses when encountering DNA damage. (2) Recombination enzymes provide a complementary strand for a lesion isolated in a single-strand gap, or reconstruct a branched DNA at the site of a double-strand break. (3) The phi X174-type primosome (or repair primosome) functions in the origin-independent reassembly of the replication fork. (4) The XerCD site-specific recombination system resolves the dimeric chromosomes that are the inevitable by-product of frequent recombination associated with recombinational DNA repair. (5) DNA excision repair and other repair systems eliminate lesions left behind in double-stranded DNA. The RecA protein plays a central role in the recombination phase of the process. Among its many activities, RecA protein is a motor protein, coupling the hydrolysis of ATP to the movement of DNA branches.

Quantitative analysis of the kinetics of end-dependent disassembly of RecA filaments from ssDNA

On linear single-stranded DNA, RecA filaments assemble and disassemble in the 5' to 3' direction. Monomers (or other units) associate at one end and dissociate from the other. ATP hydrolysis occurs throughout the filament. Dissociation can result when ATP is hydrolyzed by the monomer at the disassembly end. We have developed a comprehensive model for the end-dependent filament disassembly process. The model accounts not only for disassembly, but also for the limited reassembly that occurs as DNA is vacated by disassembling filaments. The overall process can be monitored quantitatively by following the resulting decline in DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis. The rate of disassembly is highly pH dependent, being negligible at pH 6 and reaching a maximum at pH values above 7. 5. The rate of disassembly is not significantly affected by the concentration of free RecA protein within the experimental uncertainty. For filaments on single-stranded DNA, the monomer kcat for ATP hydrolysis is 30 min-1, and disassembly proceeds at a maximum rate of 60-70 monomers per minute per filament end. The latter rate is that predicted if the ATP hydrolytic cycles of adjacent monomers are not coupled in any way.

RecA protein filaments: end-dependent dissociation from ssDNA and stabilization by RecO and RecR proteins

RecA protein filaments formed on circular (ssDNA) in the presence of ssDNA binding protein (SSB) are generally stable as long as ATP is regenerated. On linear ssDNA, stable RecA filaments are believed to be formed by nucleation at random sites on the DNA followed by filament extension in the 5' to 3' direction. This view must now be enlarged as we demonstrate that RecA filaments formed on linear ssDNA are subject to a previously undetected end-dependent disassembly process. RecA protein slowly dissociates from one filament end and is replaced by SSB. The results are most consistent with disassembly from the filament end nearest the 5' end of the DNA. The bound SSB prevents re-formation of the RecA filaments, rendering the dissociation largely irreversible. The dissociation requires ATP hydrolysis. Disassembly is not observed when the pH is lowered to 6.3 or when dATP replaces ATP. Disassembly is not observed even with ATP when both the RecO and RecR proteins are present in the initial reaction mixture. When the RecO and RecR proteins are added after most of the RecA protein has already dissociated, RecA protein filaments re-form after a short lag. The newly formed filaments contain an amount of RecA protein and exhibit an ATP hydrolysis rate comparable to that observed when the RecO and RecR proteins are included in the initial reaction mixture. The RecO and RecR proteins thereby stabilize RecA filaments even at the 5' ends of ssDNA, a fact which should affect the recombination potential of 5' ends relative to 3' ends. The location and length of RecA filaments involved in recombinational DNA repair is dictated by both the assembly and disassembly processes, as well as by the presence or absence of a variety of other proteins that can modulate either process.

Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli

Homologous recombination is a fundamental biological process. Biochemical understanding of this process is most advanced for Escherichia coli. At least 25 gene products are involved in promoting genetic exchange. At present, this includes the RecA, RecBCD (exonuclease V), RecE (exonuclease VIII), RecF, RecG, RecJ, RecN, RecOR, RecQ, RecT, RuvAB, RuvC, SbcCD, and SSB proteins, as well as DNA polymerase I, DNA gyrase, DNA topoisomerase I, DNA ligase, and DNA helicases. The activities displayed by these enzymes include homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange, helicase, branch migration, Holliday junction binding and cleavage, nuclease, ATPase, topoisomerase, DNA binding, ATP binding, polymerase, and ligase, and, collectively, they define biochemical events that are essential for efficient recombination. In addition to these needed proteins, a cis-acting recombination hot spot known as Chi (chi: 5'-GCTGGTGG-3') plays a crucial regulatory function. The biochemical steps that comprise homologous recombination can be formally divided into four parts: (i) processing of DNA molecules into suitable recombination substrates, (ii) homologous pairing of the DNA partners and the exchange of DNA strands, (iii) extension of the nascent DNA heteroduplex; and (iv) resolution of the resulting crossover structure. This review focuses on the biochemical mechanisms underlying these steps, with particular emphases on the activities of the proteins involved and on the integration of these activities into likely biochemical pathways for recombination.

In vitro reconstitution of homologous recombination reactions

The proteins essential to homologous recombination in E. coli have been purified and their individual activities have been identified, permitting biochemical reconstitution of steps that comprise the cellular recombination process. This review focuses on the biochemical events responsible for the initiation and homologous pairing steps of genetic recombination. The properties of an in vitro recombination reaction that requires the concerted action of recA, recBCD, and SSB proteins and that is stimulated by the recombination hotspot, Chi(chi), are described. The recBCD enzyme serves as the initiator of this reaction; its DNA helicase activity produces single-stranded DNA that is used by the recA protein to promote homologous pairing and DNA strand invasion of supercoiled (recipient) DNA. The SSB protein acts to trap the single-stranded DNA produced by recBCD enzyme and to facilitate pairing by the recA protein. The chi regulatory sequence acts in cis by attenuating the nuclease, but not the helicase, activity of recBCD enzyme. This attenuation assures the preservation of ssDNA produced by the DNA helicase activity and is responsible for the simulation in vitro and, presumably, in vivo. The attenuation of nuclease activity by chi results in the loss or functional inactivation of the recD subunit.

Three-stranded DNA structure; is this the secret of DNA homologous recognition?

A novel type of triple-stranded DNA structure was proposed by several groups to play a crucial role in homologous recognition between single- and double-stranded DNA molecules. In this still putative structure a duplex DNA was proposed to co-ordinate a homologous single strand in its major groove side. In contrast to the well-characterized pyrimidine-purine-pyrimidine triplexes in which the two like strands are antiparallel and which are restricted to poly-pyrimidine-containing stretches, the homology-specific triplexes would have like strands in parallel orientation and would not be restricted to any particular sequence provided that there is a homology between interacting DNA molecules. For many years the stereo-chemical possibility of forming homology-dependent three- or four-stranded DNA structures during the pairing stage of recombination reactions was seriously considered in published papers. However, only recently has there been a marked increase in the number of papers that have directly tested the formation of triple-stranded DNA structures during the actual pairing stage of the recombination reaction. Unfortunately the results of these tests are not totally clear cut; while some laboratories presented experimental evidence consistent with the formation of triplexes, others studying the same or very similar systems offered alternative explanations. The aim of this review is to present the current state of the central question in the mechanism of homologous recombination, namely, what kind of DNA structure is responsible for DNA homologous recognition. Is it a novel triplex structure or just a classical duplex?

ATP hydrolysis and the displaced strand are two factors that determine the polarity of RecA-promoted DNA strand exchange

When the recA protein (RecA) of Escherichia coli promotes strand exchange between single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) circles and linear double-stranded DNAs (dsDNA) with complementary 5' or 3' ends a polarity is observed. This property of RecA depends on ATP hydrolysis and the ssDNA that is displaced in the reaction since no polarity is observed in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, ATP gamma S, or in the presence of single-strand specific exonucleases. Based on these results a model is presented in which both the 5' and 3' complementary ends of the linear dsDNA initiate pairing with the ssDNA circle but only one end remains stably paired. According to this model, the association/dissociation of RecA in the 5' to 3' direction on the displaced strand determines the polarity of strand exchange by favoring or blocking its reinvasion into the newly formed dsDNA. Reinvasion is favored when the displaced strand is coated with RecA whereas it is blocked when it lacks RecA, remains covered by single-stranded DNA binding protein or is removed by a single-strand specific exonuclease. The requirement for ATP hydrolysis is explained if the binding of RecA to the displaced strand occurs via the dissociation and/or transfer of RecA, two functions that depend on ATP hydrolysis. The energy for strand exchange derives from the higher binding constant of RecA for the newly formed dsDNA as compared with that for ssDNA and not from ATP hydrolysis.

An overview of homologous pairing and DNA strand exchange proteins

Processes fundamental to all models of genetic recombination include the homologous pairing and subsequent exchange of DNA strands. Biochemical analysis of these events has been conducted primarily on the recA protein of Escherichia coli, although proteins which can promote such reactions have been purified from many sources, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic. The activities of these homologous pairing and DNA strand exchange proteins are either ATP-dependent, as predicted based on the recA protein paradigm, or, more unexpectedly, ATP-independent. This review examines the reactions promoted by both classes of proteins and highlights their similarities and differences. The mechanistic implications of the apparent existence of 2 classes of strand exchange protein are discussed.