Precursor-specific requirements for SecA, SecB, and delta muH+ during protein export of Escherichia coli

β-Barrel Assembly Machinery (BAM) Complex as Novel Antibacterial Drug Target

The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is closely related to the pathogenicity and drug resistance of bacteria. Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are a class of proteins with important biological functions on the outer membrane. The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex plays a key role in OMP biogenesis, which ensures that the OMP is inserted into the outer membrane in a correct folding manner and performs nutrient uptake, antibiotic resistance, cell adhesion, cell signaling, and maintenance of membrane stability and other functions. The BAM complex is highly conserved among Gram-negative bacteria. The abnormality of the BAM complex will lead to the obstruction of OMP folding, affect the function of the outer membrane, and eventually lead to bacterial death. In view of the important role of the BAM complex in OMP biogenesis, the BAM complex has become an attractive target for the development of new antibacterial drugs against Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we summarize the structure and function of the BAM complex and review the latest research progress of antibacterial drugs targeting BAM in order to provide a new perspective for the development of antibiotics.

Protein secretion and outer membrane assembly in Alphaproteobacteria

The assembly of beta-barrel proteins into membranes is a fundamental process that is essential in Gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria and plastids. Our understanding of the mechanism of beta-barrel assembly is progressing from studies carried out in Escherichia coli and Neisseria meningitidis. Comparative sequence analysis suggests that while many components mediating beta-barrel protein assembly are conserved in all groups of bacteria with outer membranes, some components are notably absent. The Alphaproteobacteria in particular seem prone to gene loss and show the presence or absence of specific components mediating the assembly of beta-barrels: some components of the pathway appear to be missing from whole groups of bacteria (e.g. Skp, YfgL and NlpB), other proteins are conserved but are missing characteristic domains (e.g. SurA). This comparative analysis is also revealing important structural signatures that are vague unless multiple members from a protein family are considered as a group (e.g. tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motifs in YfiO, beta-propeller signatures in YfgL). Given that the process of the beta-barrel assembly is conserved, analysis of outer membrane biogenesis in Alphaproteobacteria, the bacterial group that gave rise to mitochondria, also promises insight into the assembly of beta-barrel proteins in eukaryotes.

Structure and function of SecA, the preprotein translocase nanomotor

Most secretory proteins that are destined for the periplasm or the outer membrane are exported through the bacterial plasma membrane by the Sec translocase. Translocase is a complex nanomachine that moves processively along its aminoacyl polymeric substrates effectively pumping them to the periplasmic space. The salient features of this process are: (a) a membrane-embedded "clamp" formed by the trimeric SecYEG protein, (b) a "motor" provided by the dimeric SecA ATPase, (c) regulatory subunits that optimize catalysis and (d) both chemical and electrochemical metabolic energy. Significant recent strides have allowed structural, biochemical and biophysical dissection of the export reaction. A model incorporating stepwise strokes of the translocase nanomachine at work is discussed.

Signal recognition particle-dependent protein targeting, universal to all kingdoms of life

The signal recognition particle (SRP) and its membrane-bound receptor represent a ubiquitous protein-targeting device utilized by organisms as different as bacteria and humans, archaea and plants. The unifying concept of SRP-dependent protein targeting is that SRP binds to signal sequences of newly synthesized proteins as they emerge from the ribosome. In eukaryotes this interaction arrests or retards translation elongation until SRP targets the ribosome-nascent chain complexes via the SRP receptor to the translocation channel. Such channels are present in the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotic cells, the thylakoids of chloroplasts, or the plasma membrane of prokaryotes. The minimal functional unit of SRP consists of a signal sequence-recognizing protein and a small RNA. The as yet most complex version is the mammalian SRP whose RNA, together with six proteinaceous subunits, undergo an intricate assembly process. The preferential substrates of SRP possess especially hydrophobic signal sequences. Interactions between SRP and its receptor, the ribosome, the signal sequence, and the target membrane are regulated by GTP hydrolysis. SRP-dependent protein targeting in bacteria and chloroplasts slightly deviate from the canonical mechanism found in eukaryotes. Pro- and eukaryotic cells harbour regulatory mechanisms to prevent a malfunction of the SRP pathway.

Separate analysis of twin-arginine translocation (Tat)-specific membrane binding and translocation in Escherichia coli

The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway exports those precursor proteins to the periplasmic space of bacteria that harbor a twin-arginine (RR) consensus motif in their signal sequences. We have reproduced translocation of several Tat substrates into inside-out plasma membrane vesicles from Escherichia coli. Translocation proceeding at an efficiency of up to 20% occurs specifically via the Tat pathway as indicated by (i) its requirement for elevated levels of the TatABC proteins in the membrane vesicles, (ii) competition by an intact twin-arginine signal peptide, and (iii) susceptibility toward dissipation of the transmembrane H(+) gradient. The latter treatment, while blocking translocation, still allows for functional membrane association of Tat precursors. This is shown by the finding that translocation of isolated membrane-bound Tat precursor is restored upon re-energization of the vesicles.

Salmonella typhimurium DsbA is growth-phase regulated

Northern blot analyses, transcription assays using a dsbA::lacZ transcriptional fusion, and primer extension mapping were used to characterize the promoter region of dsbA from Salmonella typhimurium. Transcription assays measuring promoter activity of a 258-bp segment of DNA immediately upstream of the dsbA translational start site showed strong growth-phase dependence, with maximal expression in stationary phase and high levels of expression maintained for at least 72 h. This expression was not RpoS-dependent. Two transcripts initiating in the dsbA promoter region were mapped by primer extension analysis and their levels were monitored by Northern blot analysis. Growth conditions such as pH and O(2) levels affected dsbA transcription independently of growth phase. The data suggests that the promoter region of S. typhimurium is not constitutively activated. Its regulation may reflect a requirement for DsbA during conditions resulting in stationary-phase-like growth in the environment.

Functional signal peptides bind a soluble N-terminal fragment of SecA and inhibit its ATPase activity

The selective recognition of pre-secretory proteins by SecA is essential to the process of protein export from Escherichia coli, yet very little is known about the requirements for recognition and the mode of binding of precursors to SecA. The major reason for this is the lack of a soluble system suitable for biophysical study of the SecA-precursor complex. Complicating the development of such a system is the likelihood that SecA interacts with the precursor in a high affinity, productive manner only when it is activated by binding to membrane and SecYEG. A critical aspect of the precursor/SecA interaction is that it is regulated by various SecA ligands (nucleotide, lipid, SecYEG) to facilitate the release of the precursor, most likely in a stepwise fashion, for translocation. Several recent reports show that functions of SecA can be studied using separated domains. Using this approach, we have isolated a proteolytically generated N-terminal fragment of SecA, which is stably folded, has high ATPase activity, and represents an activated version of SecA. We report here that this fragment, termed SecA64, binds signal peptides with significantly higher affinity than does SecA. Moreover, the ATPase activity of SecA64 is inhibited by signal peptides to an extent that correlates with the ability of these signal peptides to inhibit either SecA translocation ATPase or in vitro protein translocation, arguing that the interaction with SecA64 is functionally significant. Thus, SecA64 offers a soluble, well defined system to study the mode of recognition of signal peptides by SecA and the regulation of signal peptide release.

Protein traffic in bacteria: multiple routes from the ribosome to and across the membrane

Bacteria use several routes to target their exported proteins to the plasma membrane. The majority are exported through pores formed by SecY and SecE. Two different molecular machineries are used to target proteins to the SecYE translocon. Translocated proteins, synthesized as precursors with cleavable signal sequences, require cytoplasmic chaperones, such as SecB, to remain competent for posttranslational transport. In concert with SecB, SecA targets the precursors to SecY and energizes their translocation by its ATPase activity. The latter function involves a partial insertion of SecA itself into the SecYE translocon, a process that is strongly assisted by a couple of membrane proteins, SecG, SecD, SecF, YajC, and the proton gradient across the membrane. Integral membrane proteins, however, are specifically recognized by a direct interaction between their noncleaved signal anchor sequences and the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) consisting of Ffh and 4.5S RNA. Recognition occurs during synthesis at the ribosome and leads to a cotranslational targeting to SecYE that is mediated by FtsY and the hydrolysis of GTP. No other Sec protein is required for integration unless the membrane protein also contains long translocated domains that engage the SecA machinery. Discrimination between SecA/SecB- and SRP-dependent targeting involves the specificity of SRP for hydrophobic signal anchor sequences and the exclusion of SRP from nascent chains of translocated proteins by trigger factor, a ribosome-associated chaperone. The SecYE pore accepts only unfolded proteins. In contrast, a class of redox factor-containing proteins leaves the cell only as completely folded proteins. They are distinguished by a twin arginine motif of their signal sequences that by an unknown mechanism targets them to specific pores. A few membrane proteins insert spontaneously into the bacterial plasma membrane without the need for targeting factors and SecYE. Insertion depends only on hydrophobic interactions between their transmembrane segments and the lipid bilayer and on the transmembrane potential. Finally, outer membrane proteins of Gram-negative bacteria after having crossed the plasma membrane are released into the periplasm, where they undergo distinct folding events until they insert as trimers into the outer membrane. These folding processes require distinct molecular chaperones of the periplasm, such as Skp, SurA, and PpiD.

Characterization of the early steps of OE17 precursor transport by the thylakoid DeltapH/Tat machinery

In order to probe the structure and protein translocation function of the thylakoid Tat machinery, a 25-residue C-terminal extension containing a 13-residue in vivo biotinylation tag and a 6x His tag was added to a mutant precursor of the 17-kDa subunit of the oxygen-evolving complex to form pOE17(C)-BioHis. When avidin was attached to biotinylated precursor in situ, the precursor-avidin complex was neither imported nor did it form a membrane-spanning translocation intermediate. It did, however, competitively inhibit the translocation of unbiotinylated precursor with an apparent KI unaffected by avidin. It is shown that the precursor protein achieves a stable folded structure upon dilution from urea, suggesting that the avidin-induced inhibition of transport results from a folding-induced proximity of N-terminal and C-terminal domains. It is further demonstrated that the majority of precursor rapidly binds to the thylakoid membrane, remaining import competent and yet undissociable by high salt or high pH treatment at ice temperature. The membrane binding event is unaffected by avidin. Import kinetics reveal that nonproton motive force-driven transport steps make up a major fraction of the transport time. These observations suggest that the N-terminal presequence on the avidin-bound precursor is available for membrane binding and initial recognition by the transport machinery, but the attached avidin signals the machinery that the precursor is an incorrectly configured substrate and thus import is aborted. Consequently, the DeltapH/Tat machinery's proofreading mechanism must operate after precursor recognition but before the committed step in transport.

Substrate specificity of the SecB chaperone

The bacterial chaperone SecB assists translocation of proteins across the inner membrane. The mechanism by which it differentiates between secretory and cytosolic proteins is poorly understood. To identify its binding motif, we screened 2688 peptides covering sequences of 23 proteins for SecB binding. The motif is approximately 9 residues long and is enriched in aromatic and basic residues, whereas acidic residues are disfavored. Its identification allows the prediction of binding regions within protein sequences with up to 87% accuracy. SecB-binding regions occur statistically every 20-30 residues. The occurrence and affinity of binding regions are similar in SecB-dependent and -independent secretory proteins and in cytosolic proteins, and SecB lacks specificity toward signal sequences. SecB cannot thus differentiate between secretory and non-secretory proteins via its binding specificity. This conclusion is supported by the finding that SecB binds denatured luciferase, thereby allowing subsequent refolding by the DnaK system. SecB may rather be a general chaperone whose involvement in translocation is mediated by interactions of SecB and signal sequences of SecB-bound preproteins with the translocation apparatus.

Requirements for the translocation of elongation-arrested, ribosome-associated OmpA across the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli

An oligodeoxynucleotide-dependent method to generate nascent polypeptide chains was adopted for use in a cell-free translation system prepared from Escherichia coli. In this way, NH2-terminal pOmpA fragments of distinct sizes were synthesized. Because most of these pOmpA fragments could be covalently linked to puromycin, precipitated with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, and were enriched by sedimentation, they represent a population of elongation-arrested, ribosome-associated nascent chains. Translocation of these nascent pOmpA chains into inside-out membrane vesicles of E. coli required SecA and (depending on size) SecB. Whereas their translocation was strictly dependent on the H+-motive force of the vesicles, no indication for the involvement of the bacterial signal recognition particle was obtained. SecA and SecB, although required for translocation, did not mediate binding of the ribosome-associated pOmpA to membrane vesicles. However, SecA and SecB cotranslationally associated with nascent pOmpA, since they could be co-isolated with the ribosome-associated nascent chains and as such catalyzed translocation subsequent to the release of the ribosome. These results indicate that in E. coli, SecA also functionally interacts with preproteins before they are targeted to the translocase of the plasma membrane.

Correlation between requirement for SecA during export and folding properties of precursor polypeptides

The structural complexity of a ligand in association with the molecular chaperones SecB and SecA was investigated using three species of precursor maltose-binding protein, which differ in their stability as a result of an amino acid substitution in each that affects the rate of folding of the polypeptide. In the presence of high concentrations of both SecB and SecA, the precursors were translocated in vitro with indistinguishable kinetics. However, when SecA was limiting, the translocation was more rapid for precursor species, which had lower stability in the native state relative to the stability of the wild-type precursor. We propose that, when in complex with SecB, precursors can form an element of tertiary structure and that these tertiary contacts are blocked when SecA is bound.

Sec-independent protein translocation by the maize Hcf106 protein

The bacterial Sec and signal recognition particle (ffh-dependent) protein translocation mechanisms are conserved between prokaryotes and higher plant chloroplasts. A third translocation mechanism in chloroplasts [the proton concentration difference (DeltapH) pathway] was previously thought to be unique. The hcf106 mutation of maize disrupts the localization of proteins transported through this DeltapH pathway in isolated chloroplasts. The Hcf106 gene encodes a receptor-like thylakoid membrane protein, which shows homology to open reading frames from all completely sequenced bacterial genomes, which suggests that the DeltapH pathway has been conserved since the endosymbiotic origin of chloroplasts. Thus, the third protein translocation pathway, of which HCF106 is a component, is found in both bacteria and plants.

Comparative characterization of SecA from the alpha-subclass purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli reveals differences in membrane and precursor specificity

We have cloned the secA gene of the alpha-subclass purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus, a close relative to the mitochondrial ancestor, and purified the protein after expression in Escherichia coli. R. capsulatus SecA contains 904 amino acids with 53% identity to E. coli and 54% identity to Caulobacter crescentus SecA. In contrast to the nearly equal partitioning of E. coli SecA between the cytosol and plasma membrane, R. capsulatus SecA is recovered predominantly from the membrane fraction. A SecA-deficient, cell-free synthesis-translocation system prepared from R. capsulatus is used to demonstrate translocation activity of the purified R. capsulatus SecA. This translocation activity is then compared to that of the E. coli counterpart by using various precursor proteins and inside-out membrane vesicles prepared from both bacteria. We find a preference of the R. capsulatus SecA for the homologous membrane vesicles whereas E. coli SecA is active with either type of membrane. Furthermore, the two SecA proteins clearly select between distinct precursor proteins. In addition, we show here for the first time that a bacterial c-type cytochrome utilizes the canonical, Sec-dependent export pathway.

A significant fraction of functional SecA is permanently embedded in the membrane. SecA cycling on and off the membrane is not essential during protein translocation

SecA has been suggested to cycle on and off the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli during protein translocation. We have reconstituted 35S-SecA onto SecA-depleted membrane vesicles and followed the fate of the membrane-associated 35S-SecA during protein translocation. Some 35S-SecA was released from the membranes in a translocation-independent manner. However, a significant fraction of 35S-SecA remained on the membranes even after incubation with excess SecA. This fraction of 35S-SecA was shown to be integrated into the membrane and was active in protein translocation, indicating that SecA cycling on and off membrane is not required for protein translocation. Proteolysis experiments did not support the model of SecA insertion and deinsertion during protein translocation; instead, a major 48-kDa domain was found persistently embedded in the membrane regardless of translocation status. Thus, in addition to catalyzing ATP hydrolysis, certain domains of SecA probably play an important structural role in the translocation machinery, perhaps forming part of the protein-conducting channels.

The amino-terminal charge and core region hydrophobicity interdependently contribute to the function of signal sequences

We have constructed a series of signal sequence mutants that contain negatively charged amino termini and simplified core regions of varying hydrophobicity levels. This series provides a means of exploring the relative roles of the amino terminus and the hydrophobic core region during transport. The signal peptides with highly hydrophobic core regions support a rapid rate of transport in the presence of a negatively charged amino terminus. We have found that these negatively charged mutants are secreted in a manner similar to the wild-type signal sequence; sodium azide and carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone treatments indicate that the negatively charged mutants depend on SecA and the protonmotive force, respectively. These same mutants also demonstrate reduced competition with coexpressed beta-lactamase, reflecting the lower overall affinity for the transport pathway due to the net negative charge at the amino terminus. In addition, the pronounced effects of introducing three negative charges support the conclusion that the two regions function in a concerted manner.

Sec-dependent thylakoid protein translocation. Delta pH requirement is dictated by passenger protein and ATP concentration

A Sec-type system is responsible for the translocation of a subset of proteins across the thylakoid membrane in higher plant chloroplasts. Previous studies have suggested that the thylakoidal delta pH plays a minor role in this translocation mechanism, but we show here that it can be essential for the translocation process, depending on the identity of the passenger protein and the concentration of ATP. Studies using chimeric proteins show that, whereas the presequence dictates the translocation pathway, the delta pH requirement is dictated exclusively by the passenger protein; some passenger proteins are virtually delta pH-independent whereas others are absolutely dependent. delta pH requirement is not related to charge characteristics of the passenger proteins, ruling out an electrophoretic effect. Analysis of the 33-kDa photosystem II protein reveals an inverse relationship between delta pH requirement and ATP concentration; import into isolated thylakoids is inhibited 14-fold by nigericin at moderate ATP concentrations, and totally inhibited when the ATP concentration is reduced to 2 microM. The results indicate that the roles of the delta pH and ATP overlap and suggest that the delta pH may be obligatory when the passenger protein is abnormally difficult to translocate, possibly due to the folding of the polypeptide chain. We compare the energetics of this system with those of prokaryotic systems from which the chloroplast system is believed to have evolved.

A cell-free protein translocation system prepared entirely from a gram-positive organism

A cell-free protein translocation system derived exclusively from a Gram-positive bacterium is described here for the first time. Highly efficient in vitro synthesis of plasmid encoded preprolipase of Staphylococcus hyicus is accomplished by coupled transcription/translation using either a cytosolic extract of S. carnosus alone or in combination with T7-RNA-polymerase. Addition of inside-out cytoplasmic membrane vesicles of S. carnosus leads to the partial conversion (processing) of preprolipase to prolipase. In addition, as shown in a protease protection assay, a significant part of preprolipase plus prolipase is translocated in vitro into the lumen of the vesicles. Translocation of preprolipase into the membrane vesicles requires the proton-motive force and the S. carnosus SecA protein.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.