Interaction of high mobility group-I (Y) nonhistone proteins with nucleosome core particles

HMGA1 Regulates the Expression of Replication-Dependent Histone Genes and Cell-Cycle in Breast Cancer Cells

Breast cancer (BC) is the primary cause of cancer mortality in women and the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype characterized by poor differentiation and high proliferative properties. High mobility group A1 (HMGA1) is an oncogenic factor involved in the onset and progression of the neoplastic transformation in BC. Here, we unraveled that the replication-dependent-histone (RD-HIST) gene expression is enriched in BC tissues and correlates with HMGA1 expression. We explored the role of HMGA1 in modulating the RD-HIST genes expression in TNBC cells and show that MDA-MB-231 cells, depleted of HMGA1, express low levels of core histones. We show that HMGA1 participates in the activation of the HIST1H4H promoter and that it interacts with the nuclear protein of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated locus (NPAT), the coordinator of the transcription of the RD-HIST genes. Moreover, we demonstrate that HMGA1 silencing increases the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase both in TNBC and epirubicin resistant TNBC cells. Moreover, HMGA1 silencing causes an increase in epirubicin IC₅₀ both in parental and epirubicin resistant cells thus suggesting that targeting HMGA1 could affect the efficacy of epirubicin treatment.

Protein intrinsic disorder on a dynamic nucleosomal landscape

The complex nucleoprotein landscape of the eukaryotic cell nucleus is rich in dynamic proteins that lack a stable three-dimensional structure. Many of these intrinsically disordered proteins operate directly on the first fundamental level of genome compaction: the nucleosome. Here we give an overview of how disordered interactions with and within nucleosomes shape the dynamics, architecture, and epigenetic regulation of the genetic material, controlling cellular transcription patterns. We highlight experimental and computational challenges in the study of protein disorder and illustrate how integrative approaches are increasingly unveiling the fine details of nuclear interaction networks. We finally dissect sequence properties encoded in disordered regions and assess common features of disordered nucleosome-binding proteins. As drivers of many critical biological processes, disordered proteins are integral to a comprehensive molecular view of the dynamic nuclear milieu.

HMGA Genes and Proteins in Development and Evolution

HMGA (high mobility group A) (HMGA1 and HMGA2) are small non-histone proteins that can bind DNA and modify chromatin state, thus modulating the accessibility of regulatory factors to the DNA and contributing to the overall panorama of gene expression tuning. In general, they are abundantly expressed during embryogenesis, but are downregulated in the adult differentiated tissues. In the present review, we summarize some aspects of their role during development, also dealing with relevant studies that have shed light on their functioning in cell biology and with emerging possible involvement of HMGA1 and HMGA2 in evolutionary biology.

HMGA1 Modulates Gene Transcription Sustaining a Tumor Signalling Pathway Acting on the Epigenetic Status of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

Chromatin accessibility plays a critical factor in regulating gene expression in cancer cells. Several factors, including the High Mobility Group A (HMGA) family members, are known to participate directly in chromatin relaxation and transcriptional activation. The HMGA1 oncogene encodes an architectural chromatin transcription factor that alters DNA structure and interacts with transcription factors favouring their landing onto transcription regulatory sequences. Here, we provide evidence of an additional mechanism exploited by HMGA1 to modulate transcription. We demonstrate that, in a triple-negative breast cancer cellular model, HMGA1 sustains the action of epigenetic modifiers and in particular it positively influences both histone H3S10 phosphorylation by ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-3 (RSK2) and histone H2BK5 acetylation by CREB-binding protein (CBP). HMGA1, RSK2, and CBP control the expression of a set of genes involved in tumor progression and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. These results suggest that HMGA1 has an effect on the epigenetic status of cancer cells and that it could be exploited as a responsiveness predictor for epigenetic therapies in triple-negative breast cancers.

Functional interplay between histone H1 and HMG proteins in chromatin

The dynamic interaction of nucleosome binding proteins with their chromatin targets is an important element in regulating the structure and function of chromatin. Histone H1 variants and High Mobility Group (HMG) proteins are ubiquitously expressed in all vertebrate cells, bind dynamically to chromatin, and are known to affect chromatin condensation and the ability of regulatory factors to access their genomic binding sites. Here, we review the studies that focus on the interactions between H1 and HMGs and highlight the functional consequences of the interplay between these architectural chromatin binding proteins. H1 and HMG proteins are mobile molecules that bind to nucleosomes as members of a dynamic protein network. All HMGs compete with H1 for chromatin binding sites, in a dose dependent fashion, but each HMG family has specific effects on the interaction of H1 with chromatin. The interplay between H1 and HMGs affects chromatin organization and plays a role in epigenetic regulation.

Identification of target genes for wild type and truncated HMGA2 in mesenchymal stem-like cells

BACKGROUND

The HMGA2 gene, coding for an architectural transcription factor involved in mesenchymal embryogenesis, is frequently deranged by translocation and/or amplification in mesenchymal tumours, generally leading to over-expression of shortened transcripts and a truncated protein.

METHODS

To identify pathways that are affected by sarcoma-associated variants of HMGA2, we have over-expressed wild type and truncated HMGA2 protein in an immortalized mesenchymal stem-like cell (MSC) line, and investigated the localisation of these proteins and their effects on differentiation and gene expression patterns.

RESULTS

Over-expression of both transgenes blocked adipogenic differentiation of these cells, and microarray analysis revealed clear changes in gene expression patterns, more pronounced for the truncated protein. Most of the genes that showed altered expression in the HMGA2-overexpressing cells fell into the group of NF-kappaB-target genes, suggesting a central role for HMGA2 in this pathway. Of particular interest was the pronounced up-regulation of SSX1, already implicated in mesenchymal oncogenesis and stem cell functions, only in cells expressing the truncated protein. Furthermore, over-expression of both HMGA2 forms was associated with a strong repression of the epithelial marker CD24, consistent with the reported low level of CD24 in cancer stem cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the c-terminal part of HMGA2 has important functions at least in mesenchymal cells, and the changes in gene expression resulting from overexpressing a protein lacking this domain may add to the malignant potential of sarcomas.

Collective mass spectrometry approaches reveal broad and combinatorial modification of high mobility group protein A1a

Transcriptional states are formed and maintained by the interaction and post-translational modification (PTM) of several chromatin proteins, such as histones and high mobility group (HMG) proteins. Among these, HMGA1a, a small heterochromatin-associated nuclear protein has been shown to be post-translationally modified, and some of these PTMs have been linked to apoptosis and cancer. In cancerous cells, HMGA1a PTMs differ between metastatic and nonmetastatic cells, suggesting the existence of an HMGA1a PTM code analogous to the "histone code." In this study, we expand on current knowledge by comprehensively characterizing PTMs on HMGA1a purified from human cells using both nanoflow liquid chromatography collision activated dissociation mediated Bottom Up and electron-transfer dissociation facilitated middle and Top Down mass spectrometry (MS). We find HMGA1a to be pervasively modified with many types of modifications such as methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation, including finding novel sites. While Bottom Up MS identified lower level modification sites, Top and Middle Down MS were utilized to identify the most commonly occurring combinatorially modified forms. Remarkably, although we identify several individual modification sites through our Bottom Up and Middle Down MS analyses, we find relatively few combinatorially modified forms dominate the population through Top Down proteomics. The main combinatorial PTMs we find through the Top Down approach are N-terminal acetylation, Arg25 methylation along with phosphorylation of the three most C-terminal serine residues in primarily a diphosphorylated form. This report presents one of the most detailed analyses of HMGA1a to date and illustrates the strength of using a combined MS effort.

Systems-wide proteomic characterization of combinatorial post-translational modification patterns

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been widely shown to influence protein-protein interactions, direct subcellular location and transduce a variety of both internal and externally generated signals into cellular/phenotypic outcomes. Mass spectrometry has been a key tool for the elucidation of several types of PTMs in both qualitative and quantitative manners. As large datasets on the proteome-wide level are now being generated on a daily basis, the identification of combinatorial PTM patterns has become feasible. A survey of the recent literature in this area shows that many proteins undergo multiple modifications and that sequential or hierarchal patterns exist on many proteins; the biology of these modification patterns is only starting to be unraveled. This review will outline combinatorial PTM examples in biology, and the mass spectrometry-based techniques and applications utilized in the investigations of these combinatorial PTMs.

The high mobility group protein HMGA2: a co-regulator of chromatin structure and pluripotency in stem cells?

The small, chromatin-associated HMGA proteins contain three separate DNA binding domains, so-called AT hooks, which bind preferentially to short AT-rich sequences. These proteins are abundant in pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells and most malignant human tumors, but are not detectable in normal somatic cells. They act both as activator and repressor of gene expression, and most likely facilitate DNA architectural changes during formation of specialized nucleoprotein structures at selected promoter regions. For example, HMGA2 is involved in transcriptional activation of certain cell proliferation genes, which likely contributes to its well-established oncogenic potential during tumor formation. However, surprisingly little is known about how HMGA proteins bind DNA packaged in chromatin and how this affects the chromatin structure at a larger scale. Experimental evidence suggests that HMGA2 competes with binding of histone H1 in the chromatin fiber. This could substantially alter chromatin domain structures in ES cells and contribute to the activation of certain transcription networks. HMGA2 also seems capable of recruiting enzymes directly involved in histone modifications to trigger gene expression. Furthermore, it was shown that multiple HMGA2 molecules bind stably to a single nucleosome core particle whose structure is known. How these features of HMGA2 impinge on chromatin organization inside a living cell is unknown. In this commentary, we propose that HMGA2, through the action of three independent DNA binding domains, substantially contributes to the plasticity of ES cell chromatin and is involved in the maintenance of a un-differentiated cell state.

The dynamics of HMG protein-chromatin interactions in living cells

The dynamic interaction between nuclear proteins and chromatin leads to the functional plasticity necessary to mount adequate responses to regulatory signals. Here, we review the factors regulating the chromatin interactions of the high mobility group proteins (HMGs), an abundant and ubiquitous superfamily of chromatin-binding proteins in living cells. HMGs are highly mobile and interact with the chromatin fiber in a highly dynamic fashion, as part of a protein network. The major factors that affect the binding of HMGs to chromatin are operative at the level of the single nucleosome. These factors include structural features of the HMGs, competition with other chromatin-binding proteins for nucleosome binding sites, complex formation with protein partners, and post-translational modifications in the protein or in the chromatin-binding sites. The versatile modulation of the interaction between HMG proteins and chromatin plays a role in processes that establish the cellular phenotype.

High mobility group protein HMGA1 inhibits retinoblastoma protein-mediated cellular G0 arrest

Retinoblastoma protein (RB) acts as a tumor suppressor in many tissue types, by promoting cell arrest via E2F-mediated transcriptional repression. In addition to the aberrant forms of the RB gene found in different types of cancers, many viral oncoproteins including the simian virus 40 large T antigen target RB. However, cellular factors that inhibit RB function remain to be elucidated. Here, we report that RB interacts with the high mobility group protein A1 (HMGA1), a-non-histone architectural chromatin factor that is frequently overexpressed in cancer cells. HMGA1 binds the small pocket domain of RB, and competes with HDAC1. Subsequently, overexpression of HMGA1 abolishes the inhibitory effect of RB on E2F-activated transcription from the cyclin E promoter. Under serum starvation, T98G cells had been previously shown to be arrested in the G0 phase in an RB-mediated manner. The G0 phase was characterized by growth arrest and low levels of transcription, together with the hypophosphorylation of RB and the downregulation of HMGA1. In contrast, such serum-depleted G0 arrest was abrogated in T98G cells overexpressing HMGA1. The overexpressed HMGA1 was found to form complexes with cellular RB, suggesting that downregulation of HMGA1 is required for G0 arrest. There were no phenotypic changes in HMGA1-expressing T98G cells in the presence of serum, but the persistent expression of HMGA1 under serum starvation caused various nuclear abnormalities, which were similarly induced in T antigen-expressing T98G cells. Our present findings indicate that overexpression of HMGA1 disturbs RB-mediated cell arrest, suggesting a negative control of RB by HMGA1.

A Mass Spectrometric Study on the in Vitro Methylation of HMGA1a and HMGA1b Proteins by PRMTs: Methylation Specificity, the Effect of Binding to AT-Rich Duplex DNA, and the Effect of C-Terminal Phosphorylation

HMGA1a and HMGA1b are members of one subfamily of non-histone chromosomal high-mobility group (HMG) proteins. They bind to various DNA-related substrates, including the minor groove of AT-rich duplex DNA sequences, and have been postulated to be architectural transcription factors functioning in a wide variety of cellular processes. Post-translational modifications of HMGA1 proteins, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation, are widely observed in tumor cells in vivo and correlated with the modulation of protein function. Here, we investigated the in vitro methylation of recombinant human HMGA1a and HMGA1b proteins by three members of the protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) family: PRMT1, PRMT3, and PRMT6. PRMT1 and PRMT3 showed a preference for methylating arginine residues in the first AT-hook of HMGA1 proteins, whereas PRMT6 methylated mainly residues in the second AT-hook. The initial sites of methylation catalyzed by PRMT1 and PRMT3 were mapped by tandem mass spectrometry to be Arg25 and Arg23, respectively, while we confirmed that the initial sites of methylation catalyzed by PRMT6 were at Arg57 and Arg59. Our results also revealed that binding of HMGA1 proteins to AT-rich duplex DNA, but not GC-rich duplex DNA, significantly inhibited the methylation efficiency of all of the PRMTs toward HMGA1 proteins. Moreover, C-terminal constitutive phosphorylation of HMGA1 proteins induced by protein kinase CK2 did not have any appreciable effect on the in vitro methylation of HMGA1. Our results suggest that PRMT1 might be involved in the previously reported methylation of Arg25 in HMGA1a in vivo.

High-level expression of DNA architectural factor HMGA2 and its association with nucleosomes in human embryonic stem cells

The state of chromatin in human embryonic stem (hES) cells is a key factor determining stem cell identity. The non-histone chromatin-associated factor HMGA2 has been studied mostly in the mouse where its function seems critical for embryonic cell growth and adipocytic cell differentiation. Here we show that HMGA2 is highly expressed in two undifferentiated human embryonic stem cell lines at a level of at least 10(5) copies per individual stem cell. Interestingly, expression is further upregulated by a factor of three at day 7 of embryoid body formation, before it quickly drops to or below the level found in undifferentiated cells. We also show that HMGA2 is stably associated with inter- and metaphase hES cell chromatin, and that up to 12 HMGA2 protomers stably associate in vitro with a single nucleosome core particle of known atomic structure. Our data lend support to the possibility that HMGA2 interacts with nucleosomes in a way that imposes a global effect on the state of ES cell chromatin, which may contribute to the establishment of both ES cell identity and the initiation of specific differentiation programs.

Prothymosin α Interacts with Free Core Histones in the Nucleus of Dividing Cells

The acidic protein prothymosin alpha (ProTalpha), with a broad presence in mammalian cells, has been widely considered to have a role in cell division, through an unrevealed mechanism in which histones may be involved in view of their ability to interact with ProTalpha in vitro. Results of co-immunoprecipitation experiments presented here demonstrate that ProTalpha interacts in vivo with core histones in proliferating B-lymphocytes (NC-37 cells). This interaction occurs with histones H3, H2A, H2B and H4 located free in the nucleoplasm, whereas no interaction was detected with histone H1, mono-nucleosome particles or chromatin. Moreover, the core histones form part of a nuclear multiprotein complex of about 700 kDa separated by ProTalpha-Sepharose affinity, with components including H3 and H4 acetyltranferases, H3 methyltransferases, hnRNP isotypes A3, A2/B1 and R, ATP-dependent and independent DNA helicases II, beta-actin and vimentin, all co-purifying by gel filtration. This indicates that the interaction of ProTalpha with core histones in the nucleus may be related to the structural modification of histones H3 and H4, and hence to chromatin activity, raising the possibility that the other proteins in the nuclear complex may play a role in this process.

Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks

Proteins participate in complex sets of interactions that represent the mechanistic foundation for much of the physiology and function of the cell. These protein-protein interactions are organized into exquisitely complex networks. The architecture of protein-protein interaction networks was recently proposed to be scale-free, with most of the proteins having only one or two connections but with relatively fewer 'hubs' possessing tens, hundreds or more links. The high level of hub connectivity must somehow be reflected in protein structure. What structural quality of hub proteins enables them to interact with large numbers of diverse targets? One possibility would be to employ binding regions that have the ability to bind multiple, structurally diverse partners. This trait can be imparted by the incorporation of intrinsic disorder in one or both partners. To illustrate the value of such contributions, this review examines the roles of intrinsic disorder in protein network architecture. We show that there are three general ways that intrinsic disorder can contribute: First, intrinsic disorder can serve as the structural basis for hub protein promiscuity; secondly, intrinsically disordered proteins can bind to structured hub proteins; and thirdly, intrinsic disorder can provide flexible linkers between functional domains with the linkers enabling mechanisms that facilitate binding diversity. An important research direction will be to determine what fraction of protein-protein interaction in regulatory networks relies on intrinsic disorder.

Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling

Regulation, recognition and cell signaling involve the coordinated actions of many players. To achieve this coordination, each participant must have a valid identification (ID) that is easily recognized by the others. For proteins, these IDs are often within intrinsically disordered (also ID) regions. The functions of a set of well-characterized ID regions from a diversity of proteins are presented herein to support this view. These examples include both more recently described signaling proteins, such as p53, alpha-synuclein, HMGA, the Rieske protein, estrogen receptor alpha, chaperones, GCN4, Arf, Hdm2, FlgM, measles virus nucleoprotein, RNase E, glycogen synthase kinase 3beta, p21(Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1), caldesmon, calmodulin, BRCA1 and several other intriguing proteins, as well as historical prototypes for signaling, regulation, control and molecular recognition, such as the lac repressor, the voltage gated potassium channel, RNA polymerase and the S15 peptide associating with the RNA polymerase S-protein. The frequent occurrence and the common use of ID regions in important protein functions raise the possibility that the relationship between amino acid sequence, disordered ensemble and function might be the dominant paradigm for the molecular recognition that serves as the basis for signaling and regulation by protein molecules.

Discovering high mobility group A molecular partners in tumour cells

DNA-based activities rely on an extremely coordinated sequence of events performed by several chromatin-associated proteins which act in concert. High Mobility Group A (HMGA) proteins are non-histone architectural nuclear factors that participate in the regulation of specific genes but they are also believed to have a more general role in chromatin dynamics. The peculiarity of these proteins is their flexibility, both in terms of DNA-binding and in protein-protein interactions. Since these proteins act as core elements in the assembly of multiprotein complexes called enhanceosomes, and have already displayed the ability to interact with several different proteins, we started a proteomic approach for the systematic identification of their molecular partners. By a combination of affinity chromatography, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry we have identified about twenty putative HMGA interactors which could be roughly assigned to three different classes: mRNA processing proteins, chromatin remodelling related factors and structural proteins. Direct HMGA interaction with some of these proteins was confirmed by glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays and the HMGA domain involved was mapped. Blot-overlay experiments reveal that members of the HMGA family share most of their molecular partners but, interestingly, it seems that there are some cell-type specific partners. Taken together, these experimental data indicate that HMGA proteins are highly connected nodes in the chromatin protein network. Since these proteins are strongly implicated with cancer development, the identification of molecules able to perturb the HMGA molecular network could be a possible tool to interfere with their oncogenic activity.

Inhibition of nucleotide excision repair by high mobility group protein HMGA1

The mammalian non-histone "high mobility group" A (HMGA) proteins are the primary nuclear proteins that bind to the minor groove of AT-rich DNA. They may, therefore, influence the formation and/or repair of DNA lesions that occur in AT-rich DNA, such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) induced by UV radiation. Employing both stably transfected lines of human MCF7 cells containing tetracycline-regulated HMGA1 transgenes and primary Hs578T tumor cells, which naturally overexpress HMGA1 proteins, we have shown that cells overexpressing HMGA1a protein exhibit increased UV sensitivity. Moreover, we demonstrated that knockdown of intracellular HMGA1 concentrations via two independent methods abrogated this sensitivity. Most significantly, we observed that HMGA1a overexpression inhibited global genomic nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced CPD lesions in MCF-7 cells. Consistent with these findings in intact cells, DNA repair experiments employing Xenopus oocyte nuclear extracts and lesion-containing DNA substrates demonstrated that binding of HMGA1a markedly inhibits removal of CPDs in vitro. Furthermore, UV "photo-foot-printing" demonstrated that CPD formation within a long run of Ts (T(18)-tract) in a DNA substrate changes significantly when HMGA1 is bound prior to UV irradiation. Together, these results suggest that HMGA1 directly influences both the formation and repair of UV-induced DNA lesions in intact cells. These findings have important implications for the role that HMGA protein overexpression might play in the accumulation of mutations and genomic instabilities associated with many types of human cancers.

Role of high mobility group (HMG) chromatin proteins in DNA repair

While the structure and composition of chromatin not only influences the type and extent of DNA damage incurred by eukaryotic cells, it also poses a major obstacle to the efficient repair of genomic lesions. Understanding how DNA repair processes occur in the context of nuclear chromatin is a current experimental challenge, especially in mammalian cells where the powerful tools of genetic analysis that have been so successful in elucidating repair mechanisms in yeast have seen only limited application. Even so, work over the last decade with both yeast and mammalian cells has provided a rather detailed description of how nucleosomes, the basic subunit of chromatin, influence both DNA damage and repair in all eukaryotic cells. The picture that has emerged is, nonetheless, incomplete since mammalian chromatin is far more complex than simply consisting of vast arrays of histone-containing nucleosome core particles. Members of the "High Mobility Group" (HMG) of non-histone proteins are essential, and highly dynamic, constituents of mammalian chromosomes that participate in all aspects of chromatin structure and function, including DNA repair processes. Yet comparatively little is known about how HMG proteins participate in the molecular events of DNA repair in vivo. What information is available, however, indicates that all three major families of mammalian HMG proteins (i.e., HMGA, HMGB and HMGN) participate in various DNA repair processes, albeit in different ways. For example, HMGN proteins have been shown to stimulate nucleotide excision repair (NER) of ultraviolet light (UV)-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) lesions of DNA in vivo. In contrast, HMGA proteins have been demonstrated to preferentially bind to, and inhibit NER of, UV-induced CPDs in stretches of AT-rich DNA both in vitro and in vivo. HMGB proteins, on the other hand, have been shown to both selectively bind to, and inhibit NER of, cisplatin-induced DNA intrastrand cross-links and to bind to misincorporated nucleoside analogs and, depending on the biological circumstances, either promote lesion repair or induce cellular apoptosis. Importantly, from a medical perspective, the ability of the HMGA and HMGB proteins to inhibit DNA repair in vivo suggests that they may be intimately involved with the accumulation of genetic mutations and chromosome instabilities frequently observed in cancers. Not surprisingly, therefore, the HMG proteins are being actively investigated as potential new therapeutic drug targets for the treatment of cancers and other diseases.

Binding of the essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore protein Ndc10p to CDEII

Chromosome segregation at mitosis depends critically on the accurate assembly of kinetochores and their stable attachment to microtubules. Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores has shown that they are complex structures containing >/=50 protein components. Many of these yeast proteins have orthologs in animal cells, suggesting that key aspects of kinetochore structure have been conserved through evolution, despite the remarkable differences between the 125-base pair centromeres of budding yeast and the Mb centromeres of animal cells. We describe here an analysis of S. cerevisiae Ndc10p, one of the four protein components of the CBF3 complex. CBF3 binds to the CDEIII element of centromeric DNA and initiates kinetochore assembly. Whereas CDEIII binding by Ndc10p requires the other components of CBF3, Ndc10p can bind on its own to CDEII, a region of centromeric DNA with no known binding partners. Ndc10p-CDEII binding involves a dispersed set of sequence-selective and -nonselective contacts over approximately 80 base pairs of DNA, suggesting formation of a multimeric structure. CDEII-like sites, active in Ndc10p binding, are also present along chromosome arms. We propose that a polymeric Ndc10p complex formed on CDEII and CDEIII DNA is the foundation for recruiting microtubule attachment proteins to kinetochores. A similar type of polymeric structure on chromosome arms may mediate other chromosome-spindle interactions.

Interaction of maize chromatin-associated HMG proteins with mononucleosomes: role of core and linker histones

Two groups of plant chromatin-associated high mobility group (HMG) proteins, namely the HMGA family, typically containing four A/T-hook DNA-binding motifs, and the HMGB family, containing a single HMG-box DNA-binding domain, have been identified. We have examined the interaction of recombinant maize HMGA and five different HMGB proteins with mononucleosomes (containing approx. 165 bp of DNA) purified from micrococcal nuclease-digested maize chromatin. The HMGB proteins interacted with the nucleosomes independent of the presence of the linker histone H1, while the binding of HMGA in the presence of H1 differed from that observed in the absence of H1. HMGA and the HMGB proteins bound H1-containing nucleosome particles with similar affinity. The plant HMG proteins could also bind nucleosomes that were briefly treated with trypsin (removing the N-terminal domains of the core histones), suggesting that the histone N-termini are dispensable for HMG protein binding. In the presence of untreated nucleosomes and trypsinised nucleosomes, HMGB1 could be chemically crosslinked with a core histone, which indicates that the trypsin-resistant part of the histones within the nucleosome is the main interaction partner of HMGB1 rather than the histone N-termini. In conclusion, these results indicate that specific nucleosome binding of the plant HMGB proteins requires simultaneous DNA and histone contacts.

HMGA proteins: flexibility finds a nuclear niche?

The mammalian HMGA family of chromatin proteins possesses an unusual constellation of physical, biochemical, and biological characteristics that distinguish them from other nuclear proteins. Principal among these is the fact that, unlike other proteins, they possess little detectable secondary structure prior to interactions with other macromolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins). Upon binding to substrates, however, the HMGA proteins undergo specific disordered-to-ordered structural transitions and also induce alterations in the structure of the substrates themselves. Their intrinsic structural flexibility, combined with other features such as the control of their substrate interactions via complex patterns of in vivo biochemical modifications, allows the HMGA proteins to actively participate in a wide variety of nuclear activities including DNA replication, DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, control of gene transcription, and regulation of mRNA processing

Molecular dissection of the architectural transcription factor HMGA2

HMGA2 protein belongs to the High Mobility Group A (HMGA) family of architectural transcription factors. These proteins establish a network of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions resulting in the formation of enhanceosomes at promoters and enhancers regulating the expression of several genes. HMGA2 dysregulation, as a result of specific chromosomal rearrangements, has been identified in a variety of common benign mesenchymal tumors, and transgenic mice expressing a truncated form of HMGA2 protein demonstrated a causal relationship between the expression of the HMGA2 protein and tumorigenesis. In this paper, using several recombinant mutant proteins, we have investigated the role played by the different domains of HMGA2 in protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction. Using the IFN-beta gene as a model, we have shown that a short region of HMGA2, comprising the second DNA-binding domain, is critical for enhancing the NF-kappaB complex formation, for binding to the PRDII element, and also for protein-protein interaction with the NF-kappaB p50 subunit. Moreover, we have analyzed the interaction of HMGA2 mutant proteins with different DNA targets demonstrating that the absence of the C-terminal tail alters HMGA2/DNA complexes in a subset of DNA sequences. Our results suggest possible implications for the role of HMGA2 in tumorigenesis.

Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function

Members of the HMGA (a.k.a. HMGI/Y) family of 'high mobility group' (HMG) proteins participate in a wide variety of nuclear processes ranging from chromosome and chromatin mechanics to acting as architectural transcription factors that regulate the expression of numerous genes in vivo. As a consequence, they function in the cell as highly connected 'nodes' of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that influence a diverse array of normal biological processes including growth, proliferation, differentiation and death. The HMGA proteins, likewise, participate in pathological processes by, for example, acting as regulators of viral gene transcription and by serving as host-supplied proteins that facilitate retroviral integration. HMGA genes are bona fide proto-oncogenes that promote tumor progression and metastasis when overexpressed in cells. High constitutive HMGA protein levels are among the most consistent feature observed in all types of cancers with increasing concentrations being correlated with increasing malignancy. The intrinsic attributes that endow the HMGA proteins with these remarkable abilities are a combination of structural, biochemical and biological characteristics that are unique to these proteins. HMGA proteins have little, if any, secondary structure while free in solution but undergo disordered-to-ordered structural transitions when bound to substrates such as DNA or other proteins. Each protein contains three copies of a conserved DNA-binding peptide motif called the 'AT-hook' that preferentially binds to the minor groove of stretches of AT-rich sequence. In vivo HMGA proteins specifically interact with a large number of other proteins, most of which are transcription factors. They are also subject to many types of in vivo biochemical modifications that markedly influence their ability to interact with DNA substrates, other proteins and chromatin. And, most importantly, both the transcription of HMGA genes and the biochemical modifications of HMGA proteins are direct downstream targets of numerous signal transduction pathways making them exquisitely responsive to various environmental influences. This review covers recent advances that have contributed to our understanding of how this constellation of structural and biological features allows the HMGA proteins to serve as central 'hubs' of nuclear function.

Dual functions of largest NURF subunit NURF301 in nucleosome sliding and transcription factor interactions

NURF is an ISWI complex of four proteins that uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to catalyze nucleosome sliding. Three NURF components have been identified previously. We have cloned cDNA encoding the largest NURF subunit, revealing a 301 kDa polypeptide (NURF301) that shares structural motifs with ACF1. We have reconstituted full and partial NURF complexes from recombinant proteins and show that NURF301 and the ISWI ATPase are necessary and sufficient for accurate and efficient nucleosome sliding. An HMGA/HMGI(Y)-like domain of NURF301 that facilitates nucleosome sliding indicates the importance of DNA conformational changes in the sliding mechanism. NURF301 also shows interactions with sequence-specific transcription factors, providing a basis for targeted recruitment of the NURF complex to specific genes.

Differential chromatin association and nucleosome binding of the maize HMGA, HMGB, and SSRP1 proteins

In plants, chromosomal high mobility group (HMG) proteins have been identified in the HMGA family, containing A/T-hook DNA binding motifs, and in the HMGB family, containing an HMG-box DNA binding domain, that are considered architectural factors in chromatin. We have characterized the association of the HMGA protein, five different HMGB proteins, and the structure-specific recognition protein 1 (SSRP1) with maize chromatin by extraction experiments using NaCl, ethidium bromide, spermine, and distamycin A. The difference in the release of the proteins from chromatin by these reagents indicates that they are differentially associated with chromatin. This was confirmed by treatment of chromatin with micrococcal nuclease, demonstrating that the HMGA, HMGB2/3, and SSRP1 proteins are enriched in the highly nuclease-sensitive fraction of chromatin, which is likely to be transcriptionally competent. As examined by electrophoretic mobility shift analyses, the HMGA protein and the proteins containing an HMG domain (HMGB proteins and SSRP1) bind specifically to purified maize mononucleosomes that contain a histone octamer and approximately 165 bp of DNA. The mode of interaction with the nucleosomes differs for HMGA and HMGB proteins. In the case of the HMGB1 protein, the full-length protein is required for specific nucleosome binding, as the individual HMG-box DNA binding domain (which is sufficient for DNA interactions) interacts nonspecifically with the nucleosomes. Collectively, these findings indicate that HMGA, the various HMGB proteins, and SSPR1 are differentially associated with plant chromatin and may act as architectural factors in different nucleoprotein structures.

The basis for IL-2-induced IL-2 receptor alpha chain gene regulation: importance of two widely separated IL-2 response elements

The interleukin-2 receptor alpha (IL-2Ralpha) chain is an essential component of high-affinity IL-2 receptors. Accordingly, IL-2Ralpha expression helps to regulate T cell growth and other lymphoid functions. Lineage-restricted and activation-dependent IL-2Ralpha transcription is controlled by three upstream positive regulatory regions (PRRs). We now describe an additional IL-2 response element, PRRIV, within intron 1, in humans and mice. PRRIV activity requires GAS motifs that bind Stat5 proteins and additional upstream HMG-I(Y) binding sites. Moreover, IL-2 induces the binding of HMG-I(Y), Stat5a, and Stat5b in vivo to PRRIV and PRRIII, which also functions as an IL-2 response element. Thus, the IL-2 inducibility of the IL-2Ralpha gene is unexpectedly mediated by two widely separated regulatory Stat5-dependent elements, located both upstream and downstream of the transcription initiation sites.

HMGI/Y proteins: flexible regulators of transcription and chromatin structure

The mammalian HMGI/Y (HMGA) non-histone proteins participate in a wide variety of cellular processes including regulation of inducible gene transcription, integration of retroviruses into chromosomes and the induction of neoplastic transformation and promotion of metastatic progression of cancer cells. Recent advances have contributed greatly to our understanding of how the HMGI/Y proteins participate in the molecular mechanisms underlying these biological events. All members of the HMGI/Y family of 'high mobility group' proteins are characterized by the presence of multiple copies of a conserved DNA-binding peptide motif called the 'AT hook' that preferentially binds to the narrow minor groove of stretches of AT-rich sequence. The mammalian HMGI/Y proteins have little, if any, secondary structure in solution but assume distinct conformations when bound to substrates such as DNA or other proteins. Their intrinsic flexibility allows the HMGI/Y proteins to participate in specific protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that induce both structural changes in chromatin substrates and the formation of stereospecific complexes called 'enhanceosomes' on the promoter/enhancer regions of genes whose transcription they regulate. The formation of such regulatory complexes is characterized by reciprocal inductions of conformational changes in both the HMGI/Y proteins themselves and in their interacting substrates. It may well be that the inherent flexibility of the HMGI/Y proteins, combined with their ability to undergo reversible disordered-to-ordered structural transitions, has been a significant factor in the evolutionary selection of these proteins for their functional role(s) in cells.

Architectural transcription factor HMGI(Y) promotes tumor progression and mesenchymal transition of human epithelial cells

Numerous studies have demonstrated that overexpression or aberrant expression of the HMGI(Y) family of architectural transcription factors is frequently associated with both neoplastic transformation of cells and metastatic tumor progression. Little is known, however, about the molecular roles played by the HMGI(Y) proteins in these events. Here we report that human breast epithelial cells harboring tetracycline-regulated HMGI(Y) transgenes acquire the ability to form both primary and metastatic tumors in nude mice only when the transgenes are actively expressed. Unexpectedly, the HMG-Y, rather than the HMG-I, isoform of these proteins is the most effective elicitor of both neoplastic transformation and metastatic progression in vivo. Furthermore, expression of either antisense or dominant-negative HMGI(Y) constructs inhibits both the rate of proliferation of tumor cells and their ability to grow anchorage independently in soft agar. Array analysis of transcription profiles demonstrates that the HMG-I and HMG-Y isoform proteins each modulate the expression of distinctive constellations of genes known to be involved in signal transduction, cell proliferation, tumor initiation, invasion, migration, induction of angiogenesis, and colonization. Immunohistochemical analyses of tumors formed in nude mice indicate that many have undergone an epithelial-mesenchymal transition in vivo. Together, these findings demonstrate that overexpression of the HMGI(Y) proteins, more specifically, the HMG-Y isoform protein, is causally associated with both neoplastic transformation and metastatic progression and suggest that induction of integrins and their signaling pathways may play significant molecular roles in these biological events.

Point mutations within AT-hook domains of the HMGI homologue HMGIYL1 affect binding to gene promoter but not to four-way junction DNA

High-mobility group I/Y (HMGI/Y) proteins are chromosomal proteins involved in gene and chromatin regulation. Elevated levels of HMGI/Y proteins were reported in diverse malignant tumors, and rearrangements of their genes are casually involved in the development of benign tumors. In humans, the chromosomal locus Xp22 has been often found to be affected in diverse benign mesenchymal tumors. Recent studies revealed that this region contains a retropseudogene HMGIYL1 which potentially can be activated in a way of "exonization" upon aberrations involving this region. The coding sequence of the HMGIY-L1 is highly homologous to the HMGI(Y) gene. On the protein level, both HMGIYL1 and HMGI differ at few amino acid residues, including their putative DNA-binding domains (DBDs). Here we have approached the question of whether the HMGIYL1 product would be able to adopt a role of HMGI in the context of binding to gene promoters and chromatin. Comparative binding studies, employing protein footprinting technique, revealed that HMGIYL1 has lost the ability to bind to the promoter of the interferon beta gene, but retained its high affinity for the four-way junction DNA. Our results stress the importance of particular residues within the DBDs for DNA binding and demonstrate that tight binding of HMGI/Y proteins to the four-way junction DNA can be achieved in alternative ways. The binding of HMGIYL1 to four-way junction DNA suggests that activation of the HMGIYL1 gene would yield a protein sharing some binding properties with HMG1-box proteins and histone H1. Thus, the HMGIYL1 could interplay together with these components in chromatin regulation.

Differential in vivo modifications of the HMGI(Y) nonhistone chromatin proteins modulate nucleosome and DNA interactions

The HMGI(Y) family of "high mobility group" nonhistone proteins are architectural transcription factors whose overexpression is highly correlated with both cancerous transformation and increased malignancy and metastatic potential of tumors in vivo. Here we report on the types of posttranslational modifications found in vivo on the HMG-I and HMG-Y proteins isolated from two human breast epithelial cell lines, MCF-7 and MCF-7/PKC-alpha, that represent different stages of neoplastic progression. The MCF-7 cell line exhibits many characteristics of normal breast epithelial cells and does not form tumors when injected into nude mice, whereas the MCF-7/PKC-alpha cell line, a derivative of MCF-7 that expresses a transgene coding for the enzyme protein kinase C-alpha (PKC-alpha), is both malignant and highly metastatic. Using MALDI mass spectrometry, we show that the HMG-Y protein is more highly modified than the HMG-I protein in both the MCF-7 and the MCF-7/PKC-alpha cells. Significantly, the HMG-Y protein isolated from the highly metastatic MCF-7/PKC-alpha cells possesses a unique constellation of phosphorylations, methylations, and acetylations not found on the HMG-I protein isolated from either the MCF-7 or MCF-7/PKC-alpha cells. We further demonstrate that some of the same amino acid residues phosphorylated on recombinant HMGI(Y) proteins by purified PKC in vitro are also phosphorylated on the HMG-I(Y) proteins isolated from MCF-7/PKC-alpha cells, suggesting that PKC phosphorylates these proteins in vivo. Quantitative substrate binding analyses indicate that the biochemical modifications present on the HMG-I and HMG-Y proteins differentially influence the ability of these proteins to interact with both A.T-rich DNA substrates and nucleosome core particles in vitro, suggesting a similar modulation of such binding affinities in vivo. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of differences in the types of in vivo biochemical modifications found on the HMG-I and HMG-Y proteins in cells and also the first experimental evidence suggesting a possible linkage between such posttranslational modifications and the neoplastic potential of cells.

Binding of HMG-I(Y) imparts architectural specificity to a positioned nucleosome on the promoter of the human interleukin-2 receptor alpha gene

Transcriptional induction of the interleukin-2 receptor alpha-chain (IL-2Ralpha) gene is a key event regulating T-cell-mediated immunity in mammals. In vivo, the T-cell-restricted protein Elf-1 and the general architectural transcription factor HMG-I(Y) cooperate in transcriptional regulation of the human IL-2Ralpha gene by binding to a specific positive regulatory region (PRRII) in its proximal promoter. Employing chromatin reconstitution analyses, we demonstrate that the binding sites for both HMG-I(Y) and Elf-1 in the PRRII element are incorporated into a strongly positioned nucleosome in vitro. A variety of analytical techniques was used to determine that a stable core particle is positioned over most of the PRRII element and that this nucleosome exhibits only a limited amount of lateral translational mobility. Regardless of its translational setting, the in vitro position of the nucleosome is such that DNA recognition sequences for both HMG-I(Y) and Elf-1 are located on the surface of the core particle. Restriction nuclease accessibility analyses indicate that a similarly positioned nucleosome also exists on the PRRII element in unstimulated lymphocytes when the IL-2Ralpha gene is silent and suggest that this core particle is remodeled following transcriptional activation of the gene in vivo. In vitro experiments employing the chemical cleavage reagent 1,10-phenanthroline copper (II) covalently attached to its C-terminal end demonstrate that HMG-I(Y) protein binds to the positioned PRRII nucleosome in a direction-specific manner, thus imparting a distinct architectural configuration to the core particle. Together, these findings suggest a role for the HMG-I(Y) protein in assisting the remodeling of a critically positioned nucleosome on the PRRII promoter element during IL-2Ralpha transcriptional activation in lymphocytes in vivo.

Mouse embryos do not wait for the MBT: chromatin and RNA polymerase remodeling in genome activation at the onset of development

In Xenopus and Drosophila embryos, activation of the zygotic genome occurs after a series of rapid nuclear divisions in which DNA replication occupies most of the cell cycle. In these organisms, it has been proposed that zygotic transcription does not begin until a threshold nucleocytoplasmic ratio has been obtained in which repressive factors are titrated out and interphase becomes long enough to allow synthesis of transcripts. In mammalian embryos, however, a model of threshold nucleocytoplasmic ratios does not seem to apply, as beginning with the 1-cell stage, there are regulated cell cycles with the expression of zygotic transcripts during the cleavage period. By taking advantage of the slower kinetics at the onset of mouse development, we have characterized changes in chromatin structure and the basal transcription machinery throughout the transition from transcriptional incompetence, to minor activation of the zygotic genome during the 1-cell stage, and through major genome activation at the 2-cell stage. Further maturation of chromatin structure continues through subsequent cleavage cycles as a foundation for the first cellular differentiations in the blastocyst. The epigenetic chromatin modifications that occur during the cleavage period may have long range and inheritable effects and are undoubtedly important in the ability of the mammalian oocyte to remodel previously defined nuclear structures and cell fates.

The HMG-I(Y) A.T-hook peptide motif confers DNA-binding specificity to a structured chimeric protein

Chromosomal translocations involving genes coding for members of the HMG-I(Y) family of "high mobility group" non-histone chromatin proteins (HMG-I, HMG-Y, and HMG-IC) have been observed in numerous types of human tumors. Many of these gene rearrangements result in the creation of chimeric proteins in which the DNA-binding domains of the HMG-I(Y) proteins, the so-called A.T-hook motifs, have been fused to heterologous peptide sequences. Although little is known about either the structure or biophysical properties of these naturally occurring fusion proteins, the suggestion has been made that such chimeras have probably assumed an altered in vivo DNA-binding specificity due to the presence of the A.T-hook motifs. To investigate this possibility, we performed in vitro "domain-swap" experiments using a model protein fusion system in which a single A. T-hook peptide was exchanged for a corresponding length peptide in the well characterized "B-box" DNA-binding domain of the HMG-1 non-histone chromatin protein. Here we report that chimeric A. T-hook/B-box hybrids exhibit in vitro DNA-binding characteristics resembling those of wild type HMG-I(Y) protein, rather than the HMG-1 protein. These results strongly suggest that the chimeric fusion proteins produced in human tumors as a result of HMG-I(Y) gene chromosomal translocations also retain A.T-hook-imparted DNA-binding properties in vivo.

Directional binding of HMG-I(Y) on four-way junction DNA and the molecular basis for competitive binding with HMG-1 and histone H1

Histone H1, HMG-1 and HMG-I(Y) are mammalian nuclear proteins possessing distinctive DNA-binding domain structures that share the common property of preferentially binding to four-way junction (4H) DNA, an in vitro mimic of the in vivo genetic recombination intermediate known as the Holliday junction. Nevertheless, these three proteins bind to 4H DNA in vitro with very different affinities and in a mutually exclusive manner. To investigate the molecular basis for these distinctive binding characteristics, we employed base pair resolution hydroxyl radical footprinting to determine the precise sites of nucleotide interactions of both HMG-1 and histone H1 on 4H DNA and compared these contacts with those previously described for HMG-I(Y) on the same substrate. Each of these proteins had a unique binding pattern on 4H DNA and yet shared certain common nucleotide contacts on the arms of the 4H DNA molecule near the branch point. Both the HMG-I(Y) and HMG-1 proteins made specific contacts across the 4H DNA branch point, as well as interacting at discrete sites on the arms, whereas the globular domain of histone H1 bound exclusively to the arms of the 4H DNA substrate without contacting nucleotides at the crossover region. Experiments employing the chemical cleavage reagent 1, 10-orthophenanthroline copper(II) attached to the C-terminal end of a site-specifically mutagenized HMG-I(Y) protein molecule demonstrated that this protein binds to 4H DNA in a distinctly polar, direction-specific manner. Together these results provide an attractive molecular explanation for the observed mutually exclusive 4H DNA-binding characteristics of these proteins and also allow for critical assessment of proposed models for their interaction with 4H DNA substrates. The results also have important implications concerning the possible in vivo roles of HMG-I(Y), histone H1 and HMG-1 in biological processes such as genetic recombination and retroviral integration.

Specific binding of high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein and histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon promoter: HMGI protein acts as a potential antirepressor of the promoter

The high-mobility-group I (HMGI) protein is a nonhistone component of active chromatin. In this work, we demonstrate that HMGI protein specifically binds to the AT-rich region of the murine beta interferon (IFN-beta) promoter localized upstream of the murine virus-responsive element (VRE). Contrary to what has been described for the human promoter, HMGI protein did not specifically bind to the VRE of the murine IFN-beta promoter. Stably transfected promoters carrying mutations on this HMGI binding site displayed delayed virus-induced kinetics of transcription. When integrated into chromatin, the mutated promoter remained repressed and never reached normal transcriptional activity. Such a phenomenon was not observed with transiently transfected promoters upon which chromatin was only partially reconstituted. Using UV footprinting, we show that the upstream AT-rich sequences of the murine IFN-beta promoter constitute a preferential binding region for histone H1. Transfection with a plasmid carrying scaffold attachment regions as well as incubation with distamycin led to the derepression of the IFN-beta promoter stably integrated into chromatin. In vitro, HMGI protein was able to displace histone H1 from the upstream AT-rich region of the wild-type promoter but not from the promoter carrying mutations on the upstream high-affinity HMGI binding site. Our results suggest that the binding of histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of the promoter might be partly responsible for the constitutive repression of the promoter. The displacement by HMGI protein of histone H1 could help to convert the IFN-beta promoter from a repressed to an active state.

Cell cycle regulation and functions of HMG-I(Y)

Members of the HMG-I(Y) family of "high mobility group" (HMG) proteins are distinguished from other nonhistone chromatin proteins by their ability to preferentially recognize the structure of the narrow minor groove of A.T-sequences of B-form DNA. In vivo the HMG-I(Y) proteins are localized in the A.T-rich G/Q bands and in the "scaffold-associated regions" (SARs) of metaphase chromosomes. These proteins also share with some of the other "HMG box" proteins the ability to recognize non-B-form structures, such as cruciforms (four-way junctions), as well as the possessing the capacity to introduce both bends and supercoils in substrate DNAs. These characteristics, along with their ability to specifically interact with a number of known transcription factors, enable the HMG-I(Y) proteins to function in vivo as structural transcription factors for a number mammalian genes. The HMG-I(Y) proteins are also in vivo substrates for the cell cycle regulated Cdc2 kinase which phosphorylates the DNA-binding domain(s) of the protein and, as a result, decreases their substrate binding affinity. This reversible in vivo pattern of Cdc2 kinase phosphorylations during the cell cycle is likely to play a major role in mediating the biological function(s) of the HMG-I(Y) proteins.

HIV-1 cDNA integration: requirement of HMG I(Y) protein for function of preintegration complexes in vitro

We present data indicating that a host protein is important for function of HIV-1 preintegration complexes (PICs) in vitro. PICs partially purified from infected cells were subjected to gel filtration in 600 mM KCl, which removed a factor required for integration without fully disrupting PICs. Addition of an extract from uninfected cells restored activity. Fractionation of the complementing activity yielded HMG I(Y), a nonhistone chromosomal protein important for transcriptional control and chromosomal architecture. Complementing activity could be isolated from PICs, and activity could be depleted from such fractions with an antibody against HMG I(Y). Recombinant HMG I(Y) also complemented salt-stripped complexes. The finding that a host protein is required for integration by HIV PICs parallels findings in several well-studied transposition and site-specific recombination systems.

Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 protein up-regulates the expression of the high mobility group protein HMG-I(Y) gene in mouse 10T1/2 cells

Using a differential hybridization technique, we have identified a mouse cellular gene, high mobility group protein HMG-I(Y), whose expression is up-regulated by the E6 protein of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16. This gene was overexpressed in E6-expressing mouse 10T1/2 cells, but not in G418-resistant 10T1/2 cells. The expression of the HMG-I(Y) gene was up-regulated by the transient expression of E6 from a zinc-inducible human metallothionein-IIA gene promoter. Expression was found to be more efficient at a confluent cell density than at a subconfluent cell density. The up-regulation of HMG-I(Y) gene expression by E6, in particular at a confluent cell density, may be part of an altered genetic program in host cells infected with HPV-16.

Substrate structure influences binding of the non-histone protein HMG-I(Y) to free nucleosomal DNA

High mobility group protein HMG-I(Y) selectively binds to stretches of A.T-rich B-form DNA in vitro by recognition of substrate structure rather nucleotide sequence. Recognition of altered DNA structures has also been proposed to explain the preferential binding of this non-histone protein to four-way junction DNA as well as to restricted regions of DNA on random-sequence nucleosome core particles. Here we describe experiments that examine the influence of intrinsic DNA structure, and of structure imposed by folding of DNA around histone cores, on the binding of HMG-I(Y). As substrates for binding, we chose defined-sequence DNA molecules containing A.T-rich segments demonstrated previously to have very different structures in solution. These segments are either intrinsically bent (phase A.T tracts), flexible (oligo[d(A-T)]), or straight and rigid [oligo(dA).oligo(dT)]. DNase-I and hydroxyl radical footprinting techniques were employed to analyze protein binding to these DNAs either free in solution or when they were reconstituted into monomer or dinucleosomes in vitro. Results indicate that the DNA structure exerts a significant influence on HMG-I(Y) binding both when substrates are free in solution and when they are wrapped into nucleosomal structures. For example, when DNA is free in solution, HMG-I(Y) prefers to bind to the narrow minor groove of A.T sequences but sometimes also binds to certain GpC residues having narrowed major grooves that are embedded in such sequences. On the other hand, depending on the structure and/or orientation assumed by particular A.T-rich segments on the surface of reconstituted histone octamers, HMG-I(Y) binding site selection on individual nucleosomes differs considerably. Two observations are of particular importance: (i) HMG-I(Y) can preferentially bind to certain types of A.T-DNA located on the surface of nucleosomes; and (ii) HMG-I(Y) binding can induce localized alterations in the helical periodicity and/or rotational setting of DNA on the surface of some nucleosomes. The abilities of HMG-I(Y) suggests that in vivo the protein may play an important role in recognizing and altering the structure of localized regions of chromatin.

The nuclear matrix and the regulation of chromatin organization and function

Nuclear DNA is organized into loop domains, with the base of the loop being bound to the nuclear matrix. Loops with transcriptionally active and/or potentially active genes have a DNase I-sensitive chromatin structure, while repressed chromatin loops have a condensed configuration that is essentially invisible to the transcription machinery. Core histone acetylation and torsional stress appear to be responsible for the generation and/or maintenance of the open potentially active chromatin loops. The transcriptionally active region of the loop makes several dynamic attachments with the nuclear matrix and is associated with core histones that are dynamically acetylated. Histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase, which catalyze this rapid acetylation and deacetylation, are bound to the nuclear matrix. Several transcription factors are components of the nuclear matrix. Histone acetyltransferase, deacetylase, and transcription factors may contribute to the dynamic attachment of the active chromatin domains with the nuclear matrix at sites of ongoing transcription.

Progressive maturation of chromatin structure regulates HSP70.1 gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo

In the widely studied model organisms, Drosophila and Xenopus, early embryogenesis involves an extended series of nuclear divisions prior to activation of the zygotic genome. The mammalian embryo differs in that the early cleavage phase is already characterized by regulated cell cycles with specific zygotic gene expression. In the mouse, where major activation of the zygotic genome occurs at the 2-cell stage, the HSP70.1 gene is among the earliest genes to be expressed. We investigated the developmentally regulated expression of this gene during the preimplantation period, using a luciferase transgene, with or without flanking scaffold attachment regions (SARs). Cleavage stage-specific modifications in expression profiles were examined in terms of histone H4 acetylation status, topoisomerase II activity, and the localisation of HMG-I/Y, a nuclear protein with known affinity for the AT-tracts of SARs. We demonstrate that HSP70.1-associated transcription factors are not limiting, and that instead, there is a progressive maturation of chromatin structure that is directly involved in HSP70.1 regulation during early mouse development.

Differential regulation of a multipromoter gene. Selective 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate induction of a single transcription start site in the HMG-I/Y gene

The human HMG-I/Y gene, encoding the non-histone "high mobility group" proteins HMG-I and HMG-Y, is transcriptionally activated in human K562 erythroleukemia cells by treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). TPA treatment induces differentiation of K562 cells within 2-4 days after treatment. In this report, we show that transcriptional activation of the HMG-I/Y gene is dependent on protein synthesis and is an early event (2 h after induction) in the TPA-mediated differentiation process. Of the four functional transcription start sites present in the gene, only one (start site 2) is preferentially induced upon TPA treatment. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of the preferential utilization of a specific transcription start site in response to a particular stimulus in a gene that contains multiple promoters. This indicates that each start site in the gene has the potential to be independently regulated instead of being coordinately controlled as shown in a number of other genes. In addition, sequences upstream of the inducible start site, which contains a TPA-responsive element, mediates TPA inducibility through AP1 (or an AP1-like) transcription factor. The HMG-I/Y proteins function as key regulators of gene expression and play a significant role in chromatin structural changes as well. The cloning and sequence analyses previously reported indicated the structure of the HMG-I/Y gene to be highly complex and predicted its expression to be tightly regulated. The results presented here confirm and extend these earlier findings.

DNA binding and meiotic chromosomal localization of the Drosophila nod kinesin-like protein

The Drosophila no distributive disjunction (nod) gene encodes a kinesin-like protein that has been proposed to push chromosomes toward the metaphase plate during female meiosis. We report that the nonmotor domain of the nod protein can mediate direct binding to DNA. Using an antiserum prepared against bacterially expressed nod protein, we show that during prometaphase nod protein is localized on oocyte chromosomes and is not restricted to either specific chromosomal regions or to the kinetochore. Thus, motor-based chromosome-microtubule interactions are not limited to the centromere, but extend along the chromosome arms, providing a molecular explanation for the polar ejection force.