Postillumination adenosine triphosphate synthesis in Rhodospirillum rubrum chromatophores. I. Conditions for maximal yields

A protet-based, protonic charge transfer model of energy coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation

Textbooks of biochemistry will explain that the otherwise endergonic reactions of ATP synthesis can be driven by the exergonic reactions of respiratory electron transport, and that these two half-reactions are catalyzed by protein complexes embedded in the same, closed membrane. These views are correct. The textbooks also state that, according to the chemiosmotic coupling hypothesis, a (or the) kinetically and thermodynamically competent intermediate linking the two half-reactions is the electrochemical difference of protons that is in equilibrium with that between the two bulk phases that the coupling membrane serves to separate. This gradient consists of a membrane potential term Δψ and a pH gradient term ΔpH, and is known colloquially as the protonmotive force or pmf. Artificial imposition of a pmf can drive phosphorylation, but only if the pmf exceeds some 150-170mV; to achieve in vivo rates the imposed pmf must reach 200mV. The key question then is 'does the pmf generated by electron transport exceed 200mV, or even 170mV?' The possibly surprising answer, from a great many kinds of experiment and sources of evidence, including direct measurements with microelectrodes, indicates it that it does not. Observable pH changes driven by electron transport are real, and they control various processes; however, compensating ion movements restrict the Δψ component to low values. A protet-based model, that I outline here, can account for all the necessary observations, including all of those inconsistent with chemiosmotic coupling, and provides for a variety of testable hypotheses by which it might be refined.

Proton electrochemical gradient and phosphate potential in mitochondria

The paper reports an analysis of the relationship between deltamuH the proton electrochemical potential difference, and deltaGp, the phosphate potential. Depression of deltamuH and deltaGp has been obtained by titration with: (a) carbonylcyanide trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone; (b) nigericin (+ valinomycin); (c) KCl (+ valinomycin); and (d) rotenone. The uncoupler depresses deltamuH more than nigericin (+ valinomycin), KCl (+ valinomycin) and rotenone at equivalent deltaGp. The deltaGp/deltamuH ratio is about 3 at high values of deltamuH. When deltaGp and deltamuH are depressed by nigericin (4 valinomycin) the deltaGp/deltamuH ratio remains constant. When deltaGp and deltamuH are depressed by uncouplers, the deltaGp/deltamuH ratio increases hyperbolically tending to infinity while deltamuH tends to zero. The absence of constant proportionality between deltaGp and deltamuH indicates that the proton gradients driving ATP synthesis presumably operate within microscopic environments.

The generation of the proton electrochemical potential and its role in energy transduction

The evidence that all energy transducing membranes can generate a proton electrochemical potential difference, delta micronH, across the membrane and that this potential can be used to transfer energy among energy transducing units and to generate ATP, has increased the interest for the view that delta micronH plays an obligatory role in energy transduction and ATP synthesis. In the present article we shall concentrate on two experimental questions related with the generation and role of delta micronH: (a) the charge/site ratio; (b) the relation between the proton electrochemical potential on one side and the cation electrochemical potential, the phosphate potential and the redox potential on the other. We shall then discuss the view that energy transduction corresponds to a molecular energy machine rather than to a fuel cell.