Transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. At least two nucleotides must be added to form a stable ternary complex

Structural visualization of transcription initiation in action

Transcription initiation is a complex process, and its mechanism is incompletely understood. We determined the structures of de novo transcribing complexes TC2 to TC17 with RNA polymerase II halted on G-less promoters when nascent RNAs reach 2 to 17 nucleotides in length, respectively. Connecting these structures generated a movie and a working model. As initially synthesized RNA grows, general transcription factors (GTFs) remain bound to the promoter and the transcription bubble expands. Nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-driven RNA-DNA translocation and template-strand accumulation in a nearly sealed channel may promote the transition from initially transcribing complexes (ITCs) (TC2 to TC9) to early elongation complexes (EECs) (TC10 to TC17). Our study shows dynamic processes of transcription initiation and reveals why ITCs require GTFs and bubble expansion for initial RNA synthesis, whereas EECs need GTF dissociation from the promoter and bubble collapse for promoter escape.

Promoter-proximal nucleosomes attenuate RNA polymerase II transcription through TFIID

A nucleosome is typically positioned with its proximal edge (NPE) ∼50 bp downstream from the transcription start site of metazoan RNA polymerase II promoters. This +1 nucleosome has distinctive characteristics, including the presence of variant histone types and trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4. To address the role of these features in transcription complex assembly, we generated templates with four different promoters and nucleosomes located at a variety of downstream positions, which were transcribed in vitro using HeLa nuclear extracts. Two promoters lacked TATA elements, but all supported strong initiation from a single transcription start site. In contrast to results with minimal in vitro systems based on the TATA-binding protein (TBP), TATA promoter templates with a +51 NPE were transcriptionally inhibited in extracts; activity continuously increased as the nucleosome was moved downstream to +100. Inhibition was much more pronounced for the TATA-less promoters: +51 NPE templates were inactive, and substantial activity was only seen with the +100 NPE templates. Substituting the histone variants H2A.Z, H3.3, or both did not eliminate the inhibition. However, addition of excess TBP restored activity on nucleosomal templates with TATA promoters, even with an NPE at +20. Remarkably, nucleosomal templates with histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 are active with an NPE at +51 for both TATA and TATA-less promoters. Our results strongly suggest that the +1 nucleosome interferes with promoter recognition by TFIID. This inhibition can be overcome with TBP alone at TATA promoters or through positive interactions with histone modifications and TFIID.

Gdown1 Associates Efficiently with RNA Polymerase II after Promoter Clearance and Displaces TFIIF during Transcript Elongation

Pausing during the earliest stage of transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is a nearly universal control point in metazoan gene expression. The substoichiometric Pol II subunit Gdown1 facilitates promoter proximal pausing in vitro in extract-based transcription reactions, out-competes the initiation/elongation factor TFIIF for binding to free Pol II and co-localizes with paused Pol II in vivo. However, we have shown that Gdown1 cannot functionally associate with the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC), which contains TFIIF. In the present study, we determined at what point after initiation Gdown1 can associate with Pol II and how rapidly this competition with TFIIF occurs. We show that, as with the PIC, Gdown1 cannot functionally load into open complexes or complexes engaged in abortive synthesis of very short RNAs. Gdown1 can load into early elongation complexes (EECs) with 5–9 nt RNAs, but efficient association with EECs does not take place until the point at which the upstream segment of the long initial transcription bubble reanneals. Tests of EECs assembled on a series of promoter variants confirm that this bubble collapse transition, and not transcript length, modulates Gdown1 functional affinity. Gdown1 displaces TFIIF effectively from all complexes downstream of the collapse transition, but this displacement is surprisingly slow: complete loss of TFIIF stimulation of elongation requires 5 min of incubation with Gdown1. The relatively slow functional loading of Gdown1 in the presence of TFIIF suggests that Gdown1 works in promoter-proximal pausing by locking in the paused state after elongation is already antagonized by other factors, including DSIF, NELF and possibly the first downstream nucleosome.

Formation and fate of a complete 31-protein RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex

Whereas individual RNA polymerase II (pol II)-general transcription factor (GTF) complexes are unstable, an assembly of pol II with six GTFs and promoter DNA could be isolated in abundant homogeneous form. The resulting complete pol II transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) contained equimolar amounts of all 31 protein components. An intermediate in assembly, consisting of four GTFs and promoter DNA, could be isolated and supplemented with the remaining components for formation of the PIC. Nuclease digestion and psoralen cross-linking mapped the PIC between positions -70 and -9, centered on the TATA box. Addition of ATP to the PIC resulted in quantitative conversion to an open complex, which retained all 31 proteins, contrary to expectation from previous studies. Addition of the remaining NTPs resulted in run-off transcription, with an efficiency that was promoter-dependent and was as great as 17.5% with the promoters tested.

Inactivated RNA polymerase II open complexes can be reactivated with TFIIE

Transcript initiation by RNA polymerase II (pol II) requires a helicase within TFIIH to generate the unpaired template strand. However, pol II preinitiation complexes (PICs) lose the ability to synthesize RNA very rapidly upon exposure to ATP alone in the absence of other NTPs. This inactivation is not caused by the TFIIH kinase activity, the loss of transcription factors or pol II from the PIC, or the collapse of the initially formed transcription bubble. TFIIE is necessary for PIC formation, but TFIIE is not retained as a stable component in PICs prepared by our protocol. Nevertheless, activity can be at least partially restored to ATP-treated PICs by the readdition of TFIIE. PICs formed on premelted (bubble) templates require TFIIH for effective transcript elongation to +20. Incubation of bubble template PICs with ATP caused reduced yields of 20-mers, but this effect was partially reversed by the addition of TFIIE. Our results suggest that once the open complex is formed, TFIIH decays into an inactive configuration in the absence of nucleotides for transcription. Although TFIIE does not play a role in transcript initiation itself, inactivation resulting from ATP preincubation can be reversed by a remodeling process mediated by TFIIE. Finally, we have also uncovered a major role for TFIIF in the earliest stages of transcript elongation that is unique to bubble templates.

Initiation complex structure and promoter proofreading

The initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II is a multistage process. X-ray crystal structures of transcription complexes containing short RNAs reveal three structural states: one with 2- and 3-nucleotide RNAs, in which only the 3'-end of the RNA is detectable; a second state with 4- and 5-nucleotide RNAs, with an RNA-DNA hybrid in a grossly distorted conformation; and a third state with RNAs of 6 nucleotides and longer, essentially the same as a stable elongating complex. The transition from the first to the second state correlates with a markedly reduced frequency of abortive initiation. The transition from the second to the third state correlates with partial "bubble collapse" and promoter escape. Polymerase structure is permissive for abortive initiation, thereby setting a lower limit on polymerase-promoter complex lifetime and allowing the dissociation of nonspecific complexes. Abortive initiation may be viewed as promoter proofreading, and the structural transitions as checkpoints for promoter control.

A model in vitro system for co-transcriptional splicing

A hallmark of metazoan RNA polymerase II transcripts is the presence of numerous small exons surrounded by large introns. Abundant evidence indicates that splicing to excise introns occurs co-transcriptionally, prior to release of the nascent transcript from RNAP II. Here, we established an efficient model system for co-transcriptional splicing in vitro. In this system, CMV-DNA constructs immobilized on beads generate RNAP II transcripts containing two exons and an intron. Consistent with previous work, our data indicate that elongating nascent transcripts are tethered to RNAP II on the immobilized DNA template. We show that nascent transcripts that reach full length, but are still attached to RNAP II, are efficiently spliced. When the nascent transcript is cleaved within the intron using RNase H, both the 5′ and 3′ cleavage fragments are detected in the bound fraction, where they undergo splicing. Together, our work establishes a system for co-transcriptional splicing in vitro, in which the spliceosome containing the 5′ and 3′ exons are tethered to RNAP II for splicing.

An 8 nt RNA triggers a rate-limiting shift of RNA polymerase II complexes into elongation

To better understand the critical conversions that RNA polymerase II complexes undergo during promoter escape, we determined in vitro the precise positions of the rate-limiting step and the last step requiring negative superhelicity or TFIIE and TFIIH. We found that both steps occur after synthesis of an 8 nt RNA during the stage encompassing translocation of the polymerase active site to the ninth register. When added to reactions just before this step, TFIIE and TFIIH overcame the requirement for negative superhelicity. The positions at which both steps occur were strictly dependent on RNA length as opposed to the location of the polymerase relative to promoter elements, showing that the transcript itself controls transformations during promoter escape. We propose a model in which completion of promoter escape involves a rate-limiting conversion of early transcribing complexes into elongation complexes. This transformation is triggered by synthesis of an 8 nt RNA, occurs independent of the general transcription factors, and requires under-winding in the DNA template via negative superhelicity or the action of TFIIE and TFIIH.

The Sequence at Specific Positions in the Early Transcribed Region Sets the Rate of Transcript Synthesis by RNA Polymerase II in Vitro

To further understand the mechanism of promoter escape by RNA polymerase II, we have systematically investigated the effect of core promoter sequence on the rate of transcript synthesis in vitro. Chimeric and mutant promoters were made by swapping sequences between the human interleukin-2 promoter and the adenovirus major late promoter, which exhibit different rates of transcript synthesis. Kinetic studies at these promoters revealed that sequences downstream of the start sites set the rate of transcript synthesis. Specifically, the sequences at +2 and +7/+8 are critical for determining the rate; when either +2 is a C (nontemplate strand) or +7/+8 is a TT (nontemplate strand), transcript synthesis is slow. At +7/+8, the thermodynamic stability of the RNA:DNA hybrid controls the overall rate of transcript synthesis. Our data support a model in which the rate-limiting step during transcript synthesis by RNA polymerase II in vitro occurs at the point in the reaction at which early ternary complexes transform into elongation complexes.

In vitro studies of transcript initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. 2. Formation and characterization of two distinct classes of initial transcribing complexes

By following the kinetics of abortive and productive synthesis in single-round transcription assays, we confirm the existence of two general classes of initial transcribing complexes (ITCs), which we term "productive ITC" and "unproductive ITC". The productive ITCs are able to escape from the promoter rapidly to produce full-length transcripts, but only after carrying out an obligate series of abortive initiation steps. The unproductive ITCs were found to synthesize mostly abortive transcripts of 2-3 nucleotides and escape from the promoter extremely slowly, if at all. Formation of the unproductive ITC is not due to the inactive RNA polymerase. Instead, RNA polymerase molecules recovered from both the productive and unproductive ITC fractions were shown to carry out abortive and productive synthesis with both the partitioning tendency and transcription kinetics similar to those of the original enzyme. Our results suggest that early transcription complexes are partitioned into the productive and unproductive ITCs most likely during the formation of open promoter complexes. The extent of partitioning varies with individual promoter sequences and is dependent on the nature and concentration of the initiating nucleotide. Thus, multiple classes of ITCs can be formed during promoter binding and transcript initiation.

Promoter escape by RNA polymerase II

Transcription of protein-coding genes is one of the most fundamental processes that underlies all life and is a primary mechanism of biological regulation. In eukaryotic cells, transcription depends on the formation of a complex at the promoter region of the gene that minimally includes RNA polymerase II and several auxiliary proteins known as the general transcription factors. Transcription initiation follows at the promoter site given the availability of nucleoside triphosphates and ATP. Soon after the polymerase begins the synthesis of the nascent mRNA chain, it enters a critical stage, referred to as promoter escape, that is characterized by physical and functional instability of the transcription complex. These include formation of abortive transcripts, strong dependence on ATP cofactor, the general transcription factor TFIIH and downstream template. These criteria are no longer in effect when the nascent RNA reaches a length of 14-15 nucleotides. Towards the end of promoter escape, disruption or adjustment of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, including the release of some of the general transcription factors from the early transcription complex is to be expected, allowing the transition to the elongation stage of transcription. In this review, we examine the experimental evidence that defines promoter escape as a distinct stage in transcription, and point out areas where critical information is missing.

The regulatory role for the ERCC3 helicase of general transcription factor TFIIH during promoter escape in transcriptional activation

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators have been proposed to function, for the most part, by promoting the assembly of preinitiation complex through the recruitment of the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery to the promoter. Previous studies have shown that transcriptional activation is critically dependent on transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), which functions during promoter opening and promoter escape, the steps following preinitiation complex assembly. Here we have analyzed the role of TFIIH in transcriptional activation and show that the excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC) 3 helicase activity of TFIIH plays a regulatory role to stimulate promoter escape in activated transcription. The stimulatory effect of the ERCC3 helicase is observed until approximately 10-nt RNA is synthesized, and the helicase seems to act throughout the entire course of promoter escape. Analyses of the early phase of transcription show that a majority of the initiated complexes abort transcription and fail to escape the promoter; however, the proportion of productive complexes that escape the promoter apparently increases in response to activation. Our results establish that promoter escape is an important regulatory step stimulated by the ERCC3 helicase activity in response to activation and reveal a possible mechanism of transcriptional synergy.

Translocation after synthesis of a four-nucleotide RNA commits RNA polymerase II to promoter escape

Transcription is a complex process, the regulation of which is crucial for cellular and organismic growth and development. Deciphering the molecular mechanisms that define transcription is essential to understanding the regulation of RNA synthesis. Here we describe the molecular mechanism of escape commitment, a critical step in early RNA polymerase II transcription. During escape commitment ternary transcribing complexes become stable and committed to proceeding forward through promoter escape and the remainder of the transcription reaction. We found that the point in the transcription reaction at which escape commitment occurs depends on the length of the transcript RNA (4 nucleotides [nt]) as opposed to the position of the active site of the polymerase with respect to promoter DNA elements. We found that single-stranded nucleic acids can inhibit escape commitment, and we identified oligonucleotides that are potent inhibitors of this specific step. These inhibitors bind RNA polymerase II with low nanomolar affinity and sequence specificity, and they block both promoter-dependent and promoter-independent transcription, the latter occurring in the absence of general transcription factors. We demonstrate that escape commitment involves translocation of the RNA polymerase II active site between synthesis of the third and fourth phosphodiester bonds. We propose that a conformational change in ternary transcription complexes occurs during translocation after synthesis of a 4-nt RNA to render complexes escape committed.

Kinetic and mechanistic analysis of the RNA polymerase II transcrption reaction at the human interleukin-2 promoter

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a cytokine critical for the proper stimulation of T-cells during the mammalian immune response. Shortly after T-cell stimulation, transcription of the IL-2 gene is upregulated. Here, we studied the kinetic mechanism of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter using a human in vitro RNA polymerase II transcription system. We experimentally divided the transcription reaction into discrete steps, including preinitiation complex formation, initiation, escape commitment, and promoter escape. Using pre-steady state approaches, we measured the rate at which each of these steps occurs. We found that the rate of functional preinitiation complex formation limits the overall rate of transcription at the IL-2 promoter under the conditions described here. Furthermore, we found that the recruitment of TFIIF and RNA polymerase II to a TFIID/TFIIA/TFIIB/promoter complex dictates the rate of preinitiation complex formation. The rate of synthesis of 28 nt RNA from preinitiation complexes was rapid compared to the rate of preinitiation complex formation. Moreover, we found that the synthesis of a four nucleotide RNA was necessary and sufficient to rapidly complete the escape commitment step of transcription at the IL-2 promoter. Comparative experiments with the adenovirus major late promoter revealed that, while the overall mechanism of transcription is the same at the two promoters, promoter sequence and/or architecture dictate the rate of promoter escape. We present a kinetic model for a single round of basal transcription at the IL-2 promoter that provides insight into mechanisms by which the IL-2 gene is transcriptionally regulated.

A kinetic model for the early steps of RNA synthesis by human RNA polymerase II

Eukaryotic mRNA synthesis is a highly regulated process involving numerous proteins acting in concert with RNA polymerase II to set levels of transcription from individual promoters. The transcription reaction consists of multiple steps beginning with preinitiation complex formation and ending in the production of a full-length primary transcript. We used pre-steady-state approaches to study the steps of human mRNA transcription at the adenovirus major late promoter in a minimal in vitro transcription system. These kinetic studies revealed an early transition in RNA polymerase II transcription, termed escape commitment, that occurs after initiation and prior to promoter escape. Escape commitment is rapid and is characterized by sensitivity to competitor DNA. Upon completion of escape commitment, ternary complexes are resistant to challenge by competitor DNA and slowly proceed forward through promoter escape. Escape commitment is stimulated by transcription factors TFIIE and TFIIH. We measured forward and reverse rate constants for discrete steps in transcription and present a kinetic model for the mechanism of RNA polymerase II transcription that describes five distinct steps (preinitiation complex formation, initiation, escape commitment, promoter escape, and transcript elongation) and clearly shows promoter escape is rate-limiting in this system.

The sensitivity of RNA polymerase II in elongation complexes to C-terminal domain phosphatase

The phosphorylation state of the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest RNA polymerase (RNAP) II subunit plays an important role in the regulation of transcript elongation. This report examines the sensitivity of RNAP II to dephosphorylation by CTD phosphatase (CTDP) and addresses factors that regulate its sensitivity. The CTDP sensitivity of RNAP IIO in paused elongation complexes on a dC-tailed template does not significantly differ from that of free RNAP IIO. RNAP IIO contained in elongation complexes that initiate transcription from the adenovirus-2 major late promoter in the presence of a nuclear extract is relatively resistant to dephosphorylation. Complexes treated with 1% Sarkosyl remain elongation-competent but demonstrate a 5-fold increase in CTDP sensitivity. Furthermore, the sensitivity of RNAP IIO in both control and Sarkosyl-treated elongation complexes is dependent on their position relative to the start site of transcription. Elongation complexes 11-24 nucleotides downstream are more sensitive to dephosphorylation than complexes 50-150 nucleotides downstream. The incubation of Sarkosyl-treated elongation complexes with nuclear extract restores the original resistance to dephosphorylation. These results suggest that a conformational change occurs in RNAP II as it clears the promoter, which results in an increased resistance to dephosphorylation. Furthermore, the sensitivity to dephosphorylation can be modulated by a factor(s) present in the nuclear extract.

Transcription factor TFIIH is required for promoter melting in vivo

The Rad25 protein in yeast is a DNA helicase and a subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIH. While in vitro studies have led to the hypothesis that TFIIH helicase activity plays a role in promoter melting, in vivo tests are lacking. Using potassium permanganate, which preferentially modifies single-stranded DNA, we show that a temperature-sensitive rad25(ts) mutant severely reduces the normally extensive promoter melting observed in vivo on the highly expressed genes TDH2 and PDC1 and on the induced heat shock gene HSP82. Loss of promoter melting can be observed in as little as 30 s after a shift to the nonpermissive temperature and is accompanied by a dramatic reduction in transcription. These effects on the promoter are specific, since the mutation does not affect TATA box occupancy or, in the case of HSP82, recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the TATA element or that of heat shock factor to heat shock elements. Additionally, using the technique of formaldehyde cross-linking coupled with restriction endonuclease cleavage and ligation-mediated PCR, we were able to map the polymerase density on the promoter of HSP82. This high-resolution mapping allowed us to determine that the polymerase II (Pol II) density on the promoter is also dramatically reduced after inactivation of TFIIH. These data provide strong support for the hypothesis that TFIIH functions with Pol II in the transcriptionally required step of promoter melting and show, surprisingly, that the extent of TFIIH-dependent promoter melting observed in vivo is several times larger than that seen in vitro.

Initially transcribed sequences strongly affect the extent of abortive initiation by RNA polymerase II

We investigated transcript initiation and early elongation by RNA polymerase II using templates mismatched between -9 and +3 (bubble templates). Highly purified RNA polymerase II alone was able to initiate transcription specifically on these templates in the presence of dinucleotide primers. The length distribution of abortively initiated RNAs was similar for purified RNA polymerase II on bubble templates and polymerase II on double-stranded templates in HeLa nuclear extracts. Increasing the U content in the initial portion of the transcript caused similar increases in abortive initiation for transcription of bubble templates by pure polymerase and double-stranded templates in extracts. Thus, the level of abortive initiation by RNA polymerase II is at least partly determined by interactions of the polymerase with the transcript and/or the template, independent of the general transcription factors. Substitution of 5-bromo-UTP for UTP reduced abortive initiation on bubble templates, consistent with the idea that transcription complex stability during early elongation depends on the strength of the initial RNA-DNA hybrid. Interestingly, transcription of bubble templates in HeLa extracts gave very high levels of abortive initiation, suggesting that inability to reanneal the initially melted template segment inhibits transcript elongation in the presence of the initiation factors.

Promoter-proximal stalling results from the inability to recruit transcription factor IIH to the transcription complex and is a regulated event

Promoter-proximal stalling, a general phenomenon observed during the expression of many RNA polymerase II transcribed genes, is dependent on transcription factor IIH (TFIIH). Reactions lacking TFIIH initiated transcription, but the transcription complex encountered a block to elongation proximal to the promoter. The accumulation of promoter-proximal stalled complexes was reduced in the presence of TFIIH and efficient escape from this site also required an activator. Promoter-proximal stalled complexes could not be induced to resume elongation. Our results indicate that effective recruitment of TFIIH into transcription complexes is achieved during formation of the preinitiation complex at the promoter. The studies establish that promoter clearance is a regulated event that requires TFIIH.

FACT, a factor that facilitates transcript elongation through nucleosomes

The requirements for transcriptional activation by RNA polymerase II were examined using chromatin templates assembled in vitro and a transcription system composed of the human general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II. Activator-induced, energy-dependent chromatin remodeling promoted efficient preinitiation complex formation and transcription initiation, but was not sufficient for productive transcription. Polymerases that initiated transcription on remodeled chromatin templates encountered a block to transcription proximal to the promoter. Entry into productive transcription required an accessory factor present in HeLa cell nuclear extract, FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription), which we have purified. FACT acts subsequent to transcription initiation to release RNA polymerase II from a nucleosome-induced block to productive transcription. The biochemical properties and polypeptide composition of FACT suggest that it is a novel protein factor that facilitates transcript elongation through nucleosomes.

The H3/H4 tetramer blocks transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II in vitro

We have investigated transcript elongation efficiency by RNA polymerase II on chromatin templates in vitro. Circular plasmid DNAs bearing purified RNA polymerase II transcription complexes were assembled into nucleosomes using purified histones and transient exposure to high salt, followed by dilution and dialysis. This approach resulted in nucleosome assembly beginning immediately downstream of the transcription complexes. RNA polymerases on these nucleosomal templates could extend their 15- or 35-nucleotide nascent RNAs by only about 10 nucleotides in 15 min, even in the presence of elongation factors TFIIF and SII. Efficient transcript elongation did occur upon dissociation of nucleosomes with 1% sarkosyl, indicating that the RNA polymerases were not damaged by the high salt reconstitution procedure. Since the elongation complexes were released by sarkosyl but not by SII, these complexes apparently did not enter the arrested conformation when they encountered nucleosomes. Surprisingly, elongation was no more efficient on nucleosomal templates reconstituted only with H3/H4 tetramers, even in the presence of elongation factors and/or competitor DNA at high concentration. Thus, in a purified system lacking nucleosome remodeling factors, not only the core histone octamer but also the H3/H4 tetramer provide an nearly absolute block to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II, even in the presence of elongation factors.

Promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. A role for an ATP cofactor in suppression of arrest by polymerase at promoter-proximal sites

It is well established that TFIIH-dependent transcription by RNA polymerase II requires a hydrolyzable ATP cofactor for synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond of nascent transcripts. Whether an ATP cofactor is also required after initiation for escape of RNA polymerase II from the promoter has, however, been controversial. We have now addressed this question directly by investigating the ability of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes containing short, approximately 5-8-nucleotide transcripts synthesized in the presence of limiting nucleotides to escape the promoter in the absence of an ATP cofactor in a basal transcription system reconstituted with purified RNA polymerase II and general initiation factors. Depletion of ATP had a profound effect on the ability of initiated complexes to progress into the elongation phase: whereas in the presence of ATP, the majority of transcription complexes could be chased away from the promoter-proximal region, most complexes deprived of ATP catalyzed synthesis of only a few phosphodiester bonds and then ceased elongation after synthesizing transcripts less than 10-14 nucleotides in length. A significant fraction of these transcripts could be extended following addition of ATP, indicating that they were contained in arrested, but potentially active elongation complexes. Like the ATP-requiring step in initiation, ATP-dependent suppression of arrest by RNA polymerase II at promoter-proximal sites is inhibited by adenosine 5'-O-(thio)triphosphate. Transcription complexes containing transcripts longer than 9-10 nucleotides are insensitive to inhibition by ATPgammaS, indicating that susceptibility to ATP-sensitive arrest is a property of very early elongation complexes. Taken together, our findings reveal a novel role for an ATP cofactor in transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Transcriptional commitment of mitochondrial RNA polymerase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The transcriptional commitment of mitochondrial RNA (mtRNA) polymerase and the conditions required for the formation of a stable ternary complex have been determined by in vitro transcription study. Four different transcription complexes were made in vitro by incubating purified mtRNA polymerase, cloned synthetic mitochondrial promoters and selective ribonucleotides. The responses of these complexes to heparin, an inhibitor of unbound mtRNA polymerase, have been examined to determine their involvement in transcription. This study leads to the following observations. (1) Under normal reaction conditions, 40 nM-heparin completely inhibited mitochondrial transcription. (2) A preinitiation mitochondrial DNA-RNA polymerase complex (complex 0) showed partial resistance to heparin (approximately 25% resistant to 40 nm-heparin) when heparin and ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) were added together to the preformed complex. This complex was rapidly inactivated when preincubated with heparin before the addition of rNTPs. (3) The early initiation (complexes 2 and 4) containing DNA template, RNA polymerase and a short RNA product showed more resistance (approx. 40 to 50%) to 40 nM-heparin but destabilized upon further incubation with heparin before addition of the rest of the rNTPs. (4) After generation of ten or more phosphodiester bonds (complex 11), the early transcription complex is converted into a stable initiation complex, leading to the polymerase consignment to elongation. On the basis of stability and heparin sensitivity, three initial steps of mitochondrial transcription have been defined: polymerase-promoter interaction, initiation, and the transition from initiation to elongation. The formation of preinitiation complex is the rate-limiting step t 1/2 approx. 50 s), whereas the initiation and elongation reactions are very fast processes (t 1/2 greater than 5 s) in mitochondrial transcription.

Accuracy of wheat-germ RNA polymerase II. General enzymatic properties and effect of template conformational transition from right-handed B-DNA to left-handed Z-DNA

We investigated the accuracy of the insertion process in RNA chain elongation catalyzed by wheat germ RNA polymerase II. Error frequencies varied from 1 misinserted nucleotide per 250 polymerized correct substrates to less than 1 in 2 x 10(5), depending on template sequence and nature of the divalent metal cofactor. Higher error ratios were observed in the presence of Mn2+ compared to Mg2+, and with alternating poly[d(G-C)].poly[d(G-C)] compared to poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)]. In this latter case the eukaryotic RNA polymerase was as accurate as Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holo-enzyme. The fidelity of wheat germ RNA polymerase II was also examined in transcription of polynucleotide templates in the poly[d(G-C)] family adopting either the right-handed B or left-handed Z conformations. Error ratios for noncomplementary ATP increased markedly under experimental conditions favoring the B-to-Z conformational transition of the alternating copolymers. In accordance with the results of previous studies, the rate of productive elongation, i.e. the synthesis of poly[r(G-C)], was depressed, suggesting that the decreased accuracy of the enzyme derived from an altered competence of the enzyme to form elongation complexes on the left-handed DNA. As judged by the large difference in apparent Km values of the enzyme for complementary and noncomplementary nucleoside triphosphates, part of the discrimination between substrates seemed to take place at the initial binding step. Furthermore, the results indicate that wheat germ RNA polymerase II was able to elongate a primer with a 3'-terminal mismatch, and thus to incorporate the mismatched nucleotide stably in the nascent RAN. However, the probability of productive RNA chain elongation was much lower with noncognate than with the complementary substrates.

Transcription factor eUSF is an essential component of isolated transcription complexes on the duck histone H5 gene and it mediates the interaction of TFIID with a TATA-deficient promoter

We analysed the formation of transcription complexes on the H5 gene of the duck which is efficiently transcribed in HeLa cell extracts in vitro. Upon deletion of its TATA-box, the fidelity of transcription of the H5 gene is maintained, although the efficiency of this process is significantly reduced. Selective inactivation of TFIID in whole cell extracts and reconstitution experiments either with human recombinant TFIID or a protein fraction from duck erythrocytes enriched in TFIID show that transcription of the TATA-less H5 promoter nevertheless requires the protein TFIID. Screening of promoter elements which could indirectly mediate the interaction of TFIID with a TATA-less H5 promoter led to the identification of a sequence element located about 40 base-pairs downstream from the H5 initiation site that shows partial homology to the USF consensus sequence. In electrophoretic mobility shift and footprinting studies we demonstrated a specific interaction of the erythroid factor USF (eUSF) with this downstream element. By isolating active transcription complexes we found that all components required for correct initiation remain stably associated with the H5 promoter irrespective of the presence or absence of the TATA box. Moreover, the reconstitution of eUSF and TFIID-depleted transcription complexes with purified protein fractions demonstrate that not only TFIID but also eUSF essentially participates in complex formation even on H5 promoter mutations lacking the TATA-box. Mutual interactions between eUSF and TFIID appear to stabilize the binding of TFIID in the presence or absence of its proper binding site.

Transcription on nucleosomal templates by RNA polymerase II in vitro: inhibition of elongation with enhancement of sequence-specific pausing

The process by which RNA polymerase II elongates RNA chains in vivo, where the template is at least partially in a nucleosomal configuration, remains poorly understood. To approach this question we have partially purified RNA polymerase II transcription complexes paused early in elongation. These complexes were then used as substrates for chromatin reconstitution. Elongation of the nascent RNA chains on these nucleosomal templates is severely inhibited relative to elongation on naked DNA templates. Elongation on the nucleosomal templates results in a reproducible template-specific pattern of transcripts generated by RNA polymerase pausing. The RNA polymerases are not terminated because the large majority will resume elongation upon the addition of Sarkosyl or 400 mM KCl. The effectiveness of RNA polymerase II pause/termination sites is enhanced by the presence of nucleosomes. For example, a pause site similar in sequence to the c-myc gene exon 1 terminator is used four to seven times more effectively in reconstituted templates. A comparison of elongation on templates bearing phased nucleosomes and on reconstituted templates that show no predominant phasing pattern indicates that the locations of pause sites are not related to the positions of the nucleosomes. Rather, the major determinant of RNA polymerase pausing on the nucleosomal templates appears to be the underlying DNA sequence.

RNA elongation by RNA polymerase II is not inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide or iodoacetamide

The elongation of RNA by RNA polymerase II is not inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide or iodoacetamide. Three systems were studied: a soluble chromatin, purified RNA polymerase II with DNA, and a HeLa cell extract with an adenovirus 2 promoter sequence.

Early events of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation

We have investigated the earliest stages of assembly of an RNA polymerase II transcription complex. General transcription factors from HeLa cells were partially purified and assayed using the adenovirus-2 major late promoter. Preincubation of either all the transcription factors (TF) with the DNA or only the subset consisting of TFIIA, TFIID, and DNA overcame the 15-20 min lag normally observed. The kinetics demonstrate that TFIIA first interacts with the template over a 5 min. period, and then TFIID interacts with the IIA:DNA complex over a 2 min. period. The remainder of the necessary transcription factors then interact with the IIA:IID:DNA complex. There are apparently interactions between IIA and IID, as a pre-incubation of these factors (without DNA) overcomes the lag period. Both IIA:DNA and IIA:DNA:IID interactions are temperature sensitive, resulting in slower kinetics at 0 degree C. Thus, the kinetics of transcription involve activation processes in addition to DNA binding.

Drug inhibitors of RNA polymerase II transcription

Transcription by RNA polymerase II occurs after formation of a transcription complex. This complex is assembled in stages by the interaction of transcription factors with the template and/or with each other. We report on the ability of six drugs to inhibit the assembly of the RNA polymerase II transcription complex. Assembly of the complex on the adenovirus major late promoter requires several transcription factors. The normal assembly process requires that the DNA first interact with TFIIA, then with TFIID, and finally with at least four additional transcription factors (one of which is RNA polymerase II). We observed that streptolydigin (10 micrograms/ml) inhibits association of ILA and IID, and at higher concentrations (100 micrograms/ml) inhibits that IIA/IID complex from binding to DNA. Streptovaricin (100 micrograms/ml) appears to inhibit the IIA/IID interaction with DNA and prevents reinitiation (at 500 micrograms/ml). Adriamycin (1 microgram/ml) inhibits the interaction of TFIID with the IIA/DNA complex and inhibits an additional event immediately prior to, or during, elongation. Daunorubicin may be an elongation inhibitor. Heparin at 10 micrograms/ml inhibits further assembly after the IIA/IID/DNA complex has formed, and at 100 micrograms/ml also inhibits a late event in the assembly process and blocks reinitiation. Rifamycin AF/013 (100 micrograms/ml) inhibits the early events necessary to form the IIA/IID/DNA complex and (at 10 micrograms/ml) an assembly event following formation of the IIA/IID/DNA complex. Therefore, these compounds should be useful as probes for further examination of the assembly process.

Function of a bacterial activator protein that binds to transcriptional enhancers

The nitrogen regulatory (NtrC) protein of enteric bacteria, which binds to sites that have the properties of transcriptional enhancers, is known to activate transcription by a form of RNA polymerase that contains the NtrA protein (sigma 54) as sigma factor (referred to as sigma 54-holoenzyme). In the presence of adenosine triphosphate, the NtrC protein catalyzes isomerization of closed recognition complexes between sigma 54-holoenzyme and the glnA promoter to open complexes in which DNA in the region of the transcription start site is locally denatured. NtrC is not required subsequently for maintenance of open complexes or initiation of transcription.

Potential memory and hysteretic effects in transcription

Kinetic results of RNA-chain elongation catalysed by wheat-germ RNA polymerase II are analysed according to the concept that DNA-dependent conformational transitions of the transcription complex intervene during transcription. A model is presented, involving participation of several forms of the transcription complex with different catalytic properties, generated by the sequence and/or conformation of the DNA template and/or the experimental conditions. The available experimental data suggest that these forms are interconvertible. Examples in which hysteretic transitions might occur are outlined, such as termination of transcription and transition from abortive to productive elongation in the first steps of RNA synthesis. The slow catalytic adaptation of the transcription complex to the template sequence might be a more general phenomenon for enzyme systems acting on polynucleotide templates, in view of the recent proposal that enzyme memory effects may also have some importance in DNA replication and messenger RNA (mRNA) translation.

Transcription of left-handed Z-DNA templates: increased rate of single-step addition reactions catalyzed by wheat germ RNA polymerase II

Wheat germ RNA polymerase II is able to transcribe polynucleotide templates in the poly-[d(G-C)] family, adopting either the right-handed B or left-handed Z conformations depending on the ionic environment and temperature. Thus, with poly[d(G-C)] either the B state (in MgCl2) or the associated Z* state (in MnCl2) can be established. Poly[d(G-m5C)] adopts the Z form readily in MgCl2, and poly-[d(G-br5C)] can be regarded as being "constitutively" in the Z state. In transcription studies with CpG as a primer and templates in the left-handed conformation, it is found that the rate of productive elongation, i.e., the synthesis of poly[r(G-C)], is depressed, in accordance with the results of previous studies. However, with a single triphosphate substrate, CTP, the rate of formation of the first phosphodiester bond, i.e., the synthesis of CpGpC, is about 4-fold greater with both the Z and Z* templates than with B-DNA. This transcriptional activity is also catalytic in the sense that product concentrations exceed that of the enzyme. The synthesis of CpGpC is reduced in the presence of GTP. However, the apparent Km value for GTP utilization is lower for the trinucleotide synthesis (0.1 microM) than that obtained for productive elongation (0.8 microM), a result that also holds for B-DNA templates. All transcription reactions are specifically inhibited by the fungal toxin alpha-amanitin, and, in the case of the left-handed templates, by monoclonal anti-Z-DNA antibodies. The relative probabilities of single-step addition and productive elongation imply that the major distinction between transcription of templates in the B and Z conformations involves a step following the synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond. As a result, fully competent elongation complexes do not form on the left-handed DNA.

Transcription elements and factors of RNA polymerase B promoters of higher eukaryotes

The promoter for eukaryotic genes transcribed by RNA polymerase B can be divided into the TATA box (located at -30) and startsite (+1), the upstream element (situated between -40 and about -110), and the enhancer (no fixed position relative to the startsite). Trans-acting factors, which bind to these elements, have been identified and at least partially purified. The role of the TATA box is to bind factors which focus the transcription machinery to initiate at the startsite. The upstream element and the enhancer somehow modulate this interaction, possibly through direct protein-protein interactions. Another class of transcription factors, typified by viral proteins such as the adenovirus EIA products, do not appear to require binding to a particular DNA sequence to regulate transcription. The latest findings in these various subjects are discussed.