Analysis of androgen receptor-DNA interactions with receptor proteins produced in insect cells

BZL101, a phytochemical extract from the Scutellaria barbata plant, disrupts proliferation of human breast and prostate cancer cells through distinct mechanisms dependent on the cancer cell phenotype

BZL101 is an aqueous extract from the Scutellaria barbata plant shown to have anticancer properties in a variety of human cancers. In order to determine its efficacy on human reproductive cancers, we assessed the responses of two human breast cancer cell lines, estrogen sensitive MCF7 and estrogen insensitive MDA-MB-231, and of two human prostate cancer cell lines, androgen sensitive LNCaP and androgen insensitive PC3 which are human cell lines that represent early and late stage reproductive cancers. BZL101 inhibited reproductive cancer growth in all cell lines by regulating expression levels of key cell cycle components that differ with respect to the cancer cell phenotypes. In early stage estrogen sensitive MCF7 cells, BZL101 induced a G₁ cell cycle arrest and ablated expression of key G₁ cell cycle regulators Cyclin D1, CDK2 and CDK4, as well as growth factor stimulatory pathways and estrogen receptor-α expression. Transfection of luciferase reporter plasmids revealed that the loss of CDK2, CDK4 and estrogen receptor-α transcript expression resulted from the BZL-dependent ablation of promoter activities. BZL101 growth arrests early stage androgen sensitive LNCaP cells in the G₂/M phase with corresponding decreases in Cyclin B1, CDK1 and androgen receptor expression. In late stage hormone insensitive breast (MDA-MB-231) and prostate (PC3) cancer cells, BZL101 induced an S phase arrest with corresponding ablations in Cyclin A2 and CDK2 expression. Our results demonstrate that BZL101 exerts phenotype specific anti-proliferative gene expression responses in human breast and prostate cancer cells, which will be valuable in the potential development of BZL-based therapeutic strategies for human reproductive cancers.

Differential presentation of protein interaction surfaces on the androgen receptor defines the pharmacological actions of bound ligands

The pharmacological activity of different nuclear receptor ligands is reflected by their impact on receptor structure. Thus, we asked whether differential presentation of protein-protein interaction surfaces on the androgen receptor (AR), a surrogate assay of receptor conformation, could be used in a prospective manner to define the pharmacological activity of bound ligands. To this end, we identified over 150 proteins/polypeptides whose ability to interact with AR is influenced in a differential manner by ligand binding. The most discriminatory of these protein-AR interactions were used to develop a robust compound-profiling tool that enabled the separation of ligands into functionally distinguishable classes. Importantly, the ligands within each class exhibited similar pharmacological activities, a result that highlights the relationship between receptor structure and activity and provides direction for the discovery of novel AR modulators.

Amino-terminus domain of the androgen receptor as a molecular target to prevent the hormonal progression of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer has a propensity to metastasize to the bone. Currently the only effective systemic treatment for these patients is androgen ablation therapy. However, the tumor will invariably progress to an androgen-independent stage and the patient will succumb to his disease within approximately 2 years. The earliest indication of hormonal progression is the rising titer of serum prostate specific antigen. Current evidence implicates the androgen receptor (AR) as a key factor in maintaining the growth of prostate cancer cells in an androgen-depleted state. Under normal conditions, binding of ligand activates the receptor, allowing it to effectively bind to its respective DNA element. However, AR is also transformed in the absence of androgen (ligand-independent activation) in prostate cells via multiple protein kinase pathways and the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway that converge upon the N-terminal domain of the AR. This domain is the main region for phosphorylation and is also critical for normal coregulator recruitment. Here we discuss evidence supporting the role of the AR, IL-6 and other protein kinase pathways in the hormonal progression of prostate cancer to androgen independence and the mechanisms involved in activation of the AR by these pathways. Receptor-targeted therapy, especially potential drugs targeting the N-terminal domain, may effectively prevent or delay the hormonal progression of AR-dependent prostate cancer.

Long-range activation of FKBP51 transcription by the androgen receptor via distal intronic enhancers

Androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-controlled transcription factor frequently deregulated in prostate carcinomas. Since there is scarce information on the action of AR on the chromatin level, we have elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying the androgen-dependent regulation of immunophilin FKBP51 in prostate cancer cells. In comparison to the canonical AR target PSA, FKBP51 is more rapidly and strongly induced by androgen, with the regulation occurring merely at the transcriptional level. FKBP51 locus harbors 13 in silico-predicted androgen response elements (AREs), with most of them located downstream from transcription start site (TSS) and capable of binding AR in vitro. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays in VCaP and LNCaP prostate cancer cells indicate that activation of the locus by the AR relies on four major intronic sites, with the compound ARE-containing sites ≥90 kb downstream from the TSS playing critical roles. Binding of agonist-loaded AR onto these sites in vivo was accompanied with significant recruitment of RNA polymerase II and BRM-containing chromatin remodeling complexes to the FKBP51 locus, which resulted in changes in the histone density of the locus. Our results indicate that very distal AREs act as genuine and robust enhancers, highlighting the importance of long-range regulation of transcription by the AR.

Progression of prostate cancer: multiple pathways to androgen independence

Prostate cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of cancer death in men. Initially, prostate tumors respond to hormonal therapies, but androgen-independent tumors refractory to these therapies emerge. Identifying the mechanisms responsible for the emergence of androgen independence has been the subject of multiple studies. This article reviews the multiple pathways that have been shown to promote androgen independence, including a recently described mechanism that involves androgen receptor proteolysis to a constitutively active ligand-independent isoform. Identifying the underlying mechanisms of androgen independence is crucial in the design of appropriate therapies for hormonally refractive neoplasms.

Identification of ETS-like transcription factor 4 as a novel androgen receptor target in prostate cancer cells

Transcriptional control by androgens via androgen receptor (AR) is strongly involved in prostate cancer development, but the critical target genes have remained elusive. We have characterized E twenty-six-like transcription factor 4 (ELK4) (also known as serum response factor accessory protein 1) as a novel AR target in human prostate cancer cells. In-silico screening identified three putative AR response elements (AREs) within -10 kb from the transcription start site of ELK4. Both ARE1 at -167/-153 and ARE2 at -481/-467 bound AR in vitro and mediated androgen induction as isolated elements in transcription assays in non-prostate cells. However, merely the ARE2 that cooperates with a proximal forkhead box A1-binding site was critical for the AR-dependent activation of ELK4 promoter in prostate cancer cells. Preferential loading of holo-AR onto the ARE2 and concomitant recruitment of RNA polymerase II onto the ELK4 promoter was confirmed in prostate cancer cells by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Database searches indicated that the expression of ELK4 is markedly increased in prostate cancers relative to normal prostates. Moreover, prostate cancer tissue immunostainings showed that nuclear ELK4 levels are significantly increased in androgen-refractory prostate cancers compared to untreated tumours. Reduction of the amount of ELK4 in LNCaP cells by RNAi retarded cell growth. In conclusion, ELK4 is a direct AR target in prostate cancer cells. Androgens may thus contribute to the growth of prostate cancer via influencing ELK4 levels.

A hierarchical network of transcription factors governs androgen receptor-dependent prostate cancer growth

Androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that plays a key role in prostate cancer. Little is known about the nature of AR cis-regulatory sites in the human genome. We have mapped the AR binding regions on two chromosomes in human prostate cancer cells by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with tiled oligonucleotide microarrays. We find that the majority of AR binding regions contain noncanonical AR-responsive elements (AREs). Importantly, we identify a noncanonical ARE as a cis-regulatory target of AR action in TMPRSS2, a gene fused to ETS transcription factors in the majority of prostate cancers. In addition, through the presence of enriched DNA-binding motifs, we find other transcription factors including GATA2 and Oct1 that cooperate in mediating the androgen response. These collaborating factors, together with AR, form a regulatory hierarchy that governs androgen-dependent gene expression and prostate cancer growth and offer potential new opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Cyclin D1b variant influences prostate cancer growth through aberrant androgen receptor regulation

Cyclin D1 is a multifaceted regulator of both transcription and cell-cycle progression that exists in two distinct isoforms, cyclin D1a and D1b. In the prostate, cyclin D1a acts through discrete mechanisms to negatively regulate androgen receptor (AR) activity and thus limit androgen-dependent proliferation. Accordingly, cyclin D1a is rarely overexpressed in prostatic adenocarcinoma and holds little prognostic value in this tumor type. However, a common polymorphism (A870) known to facilitate production of cyclin D1b is associated with increased prostate cancer risk. Here we show that cyclin D1b is expressed at high frequency in prostate cancer and is up-regulated in neoplastic disease. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that, although cyclin D1b retains AR association, it is selectively compromised for AR regulation. The altered ability of cyclin D1b to regulate the AR was observed by using both in vitro and in vivo assays and was associated with compromised regulation of AR-dependent proliferation. Consistent with previous reports, expression of cyclin D1a inhibited cell-cycle progression in AR-dependent prostate cancer cells. Strikingly, cyclin D1b significantly stimulated proliferation in this cell type. AR-negative prostate cancer cells were nonresponsive to cyclin D1 (a or b) expression, indicating that defects in AR corepressor function yield a growth advantage specifically in AR-dependent cells. In summary, these studies indicate that the altered AR regulatory capacity of cyclin D1b contributes to its association with increased prostate cancer risk and provide evidence of cyclin D1b-mediated transcriptional regulation.

Methylation of adjacent CpG sites affects Sp1/Sp3 binding and activity in the p21(Cip1) promoter

DNA methylation in the promoter of certain genes is associated with transcriptional silencing. Methylation affects gene expression directly by interfering with transcription factor binding and/or indirectly by recruiting histone deacetylases through methyl-DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we demonstrate that the human lung cancer cell line H719 lacks p53-dependent and -independent p21(Cip1) expression. p53 response to treatment with gamma irradiation or etoposide is lost due to a mutation at codon 242 of p53 (C-->W). Treatment with depsipeptide, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, was unable to induce p53-independent p21(Cip1) expression because the promoter of p21(Cip1) in these cells is hypermethylated. By analyzing luciferase activity of transfected p21(Cip1) promoter vectors, we demonstrate that depsipeptide functions on Sp1-binding sites to induce p21(Cip1) expression. We hypothesize that hypermethylation may interfere with Sp1/Sp3 binding. By using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we show that, although methylation within the consensus Sp1-binding site did not reduce Sp1/Sp3 binding, methylation outside of the consensus Sp1 element induced a significant decrease in Sp1/Sp3 binding. Depsipeptide induced p21(Cip1) expression was reconstituted when cells were pretreated with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Our data suggest, for the first time, that hypermethylation around the consensus Sp1-binding sites may directly reduce Sp1/Sp3 binding, therefore leading to a reduced p21(Cip1) expression in response to depsipeptide treatment.

Novel ATPase of SNF2-like protein family interacts with androgen receptor and modulates androgen-dependent transcription

Nuclear receptors, including the androgen receptor (AR), regulate target cell transcription through interaction with auxiliary proteins to modify chromatin structure. We describe herein a novel AR-interacting protein, termed ARIP4, that has structural features typical of the SNF2-like protein family. With regard to the Snf2 domain, the closest homolog of ARIP4 is the ATRX protein. ARIP4 is a nuclear protein and comprises 1466 amino acids. It interacts with AR in vitro and in cultured yeast and mammalian cells. ARIP4 can be labeled with 8-azido-[gamma-32P]ATP and exhibits DNA-dependent ATPase activity. Like several ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins, ARIP4 generates superhelical torsion within linear DNA fragments in an ATP-dependent manner. With a stably integrated target promoter, ARIP4 elicits a modest enhancement of AR-dependent transactivation. In transient cotransfection assays, ARIP4 modulates AR function in a promoter-dependent manner; it enhances receptor activity on minimal promoters, but does not activate more complex promoters. ARIP4 mutants devoid of ATPase activity fail to alter DNA topology and behave as trans-dominant negative regulators of AR function in transient assays.

The dissociation rate of estrogen receptor alpha from the consensus estrogen response element

The rate of dissociation of recombinant, purified human estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) from a fluorescein-labeled DNA containing the consensus vitellogenin ERE sequence (F-vitERE) was determined in real time using fluorescence anisotropy. The complex of estradiol-occupied ERalpha with F-vitERE had an apparent dissociation rate of 1.48+/-0.06x10(-2) s(-1) and a half-life of 46.6 s at room temperature. The dissociation rate was characterized by a single exponential decay, suggesting that ER dissociates from the DNA as a preformed dimer, rather than as two individual monomers. The association rate of estradiol-occupied ERalpha for the F-vitERE was calculated as 7x10(6) M(-1) s(-1) based on the dissociation rate measured and previous determinations of the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) in similar assay conditions (Ozers et al., 1997). In buffer containing various concentrations of salt, the rate of dissociation of estradiol-occupied ERalpha from F-vitERE was accelerated by increasing salt concentrations. Compared to estradiol-occupied ERalpha, the rate of dissociation of unoccupied ERalpha from the F-vitERE was very similar, indicating that estradiol occupancy does not affect the dissociation rate of ERalpha from the ERE.

Characterization of an androgen-specific response region within the 5' flanking region of the murine epididymal retinoic acid binding protein gene

The epididymis provides the optimal milieu for sperm maturation and storage. Epididymal secretory proteins are believed to be involved in that process. Androgens are the major endocrine and paracrine regulatory signals that regulate gene expression in the epididymis. We have previously identified an androgen-dependent retinoic acid-binding protein (mE-RABP) that is secreted into the luminal fluid from the mouse mid/distal caput epididymidis. The mE-RABP protein belongs to the lipocalin superfamily and may be involved in the trafficking of retinoic acid within the epididymis. We have recently demonstrated that 5 kilobases of the 5' flanking region of the mE-RABP gene contained all the information for the hormonal regulation and the tissue-, region-, and cell-specific expression of the mE-RABP gene. In this study, we have identified a complex androgen-specific response region (ARR) within the first 600 base pairs of the mE-RABP gene promoter. Androgen (DHT) but not glucocorticoid (DEX) activates the ARR in HeLa and PC-3 cells. Two androgen receptor binding sites have been located at positions -445/-459 and -102/-88 and were named ARBS-1 and ARBS-0, respectively. Point mutations of ARBS-0 resulted in a slight decrease of the androgen response. However, mutations of ARBS-1 led to a total loss of the androgen responsiveness, suggesting that it was a major cis-acting element. When ARBS-1 is isolated from its promoter context, it serves as a weak androgen-responsive element that was activated by both androgens and glucocorticoids. Also, the -543/-88 DNA promoter fragment behaved as a poor androgen-responsive region, suggesting that regulatory elements located within the proximal mE-RABP promoter were required for a full androgen response. In conclusion, the mE-RABP ARR is a good model for the study of molecular mechanisms that lead to an androgen-specific responsiveness in vivo.

Analysis of exon 1 mutations in the androgen receptor gene

Eleven mutations in exon 1 of the androgen receptor gene (AR) have been identified in 15 individuals with Androgen Insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Nine of the mutations yield a stop codon directly, or due to a frameshift, in individuals with complete AIS (CAIS). One individual with CAIS had three different mutations in exon 1: one is nominally silent (Glu 211; GAG 995 GAA); two are missense (Pro 390 Arg and Glu 443 Arg). Five unrelated individuals with either CAIS, partial AIS (PAIS) or mild AIS (MAIS) had GAG 995 GAA as their only alteration. This report almost doubles the number of exon 1 mutations stored in the AR Mutation Database, reinforces their highly predominant nonsense character, and identifies Pro 390 and/or Gln 443 as residues that are probably necessary for one or more specific functions of the AR's N-terminal transactivation domain.

Cooperative assembly of androgen receptor into a nucleoprotein complex that regulates the prostate-specific antigen enhancer

Prostate cancer is characterized by elevated serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA gene expression is controlled by an androgen-responsive transcriptional enhancer. Our study suggests that formation of a nucleoprotein complex, encompassing 170 base pairs of enhancer DNA, mediates androgen-responsive PSA enhancer activity. The complex is assembled by cooperative binding of androgen receptor to at least four tandem, nonconsensus androgen response elements (AREs). Systematic mutagenesis of the AREs demonstrated that they act synergistically to stimulate androgen receptor-responsive gene expression. We discuss a mechanism whereby a combination of high androgen receptor levels in the prostate and low affinity AREs contribute to the cell type specificity and activity of the enhancer.

Transcription activating and repressing functions of the androgen receptor are differentially influenced by mutations in the deoxyribonucleic acid-binding domain

Despite the wide spectrum of androgen receptor (AR) mutants described in androgen insensitivity syndromes (AIS), their influence on transactivating and, in particular, transrepressing functions of AR are poorly defined. Rat AR mutants with substitutions in the DNA-binding domain, corresponding to several mutations in AIS patients, were examined for these activities. AR variants (G551V and C562G) with mutations in the first zinc finger (ZF) exhibited reduced DNA binding activity and attenuated transactivation. An R590Q substitution in the second ZF diminished transcriptional activity only from a promoter with a single androgen response element, whereas activation at multiple androgen response element sites was unaffected, despite the poor DNA-binding affinity of R590Q. Another substitution in the second ZF, A579T, yielded similar findings. In comparison to wild-type AR, G551V, and C562G variants had markedly reduced ability to repress an NF-kappaB/RelA-activated promoter but R590Q behaved like the native receptor. AP1 function was repressed not only by wild-type AR but also by the transactivating mutants A579T and R590Q as well as by the transcriptionally inactive mutants G551V and C562G. Furthermore, a Lys-to-Ala substitution in codon 563 of the first ZF switched AR into a ligand-dependent activator at AP1 sites but maintained the ability to repress NF-kappaB/RelA function. Taken together, DNA-binding domain mutations in AIS patients influence transcriptional activating and repressing functions of AR in a selective fashion, which probably contributes to the complexity in the presentation of the AIS phenotype.

Androgen modulation of luteinizing hormone secretion by female rat gonadotropes

In the female, androgens can have negative and positive actions in the regulation of LH, but it is not clear how they may function during the reproductive cycle. Toward resolving these potentially conflicting roles for androgen, we used an in vitro model of preovulatory gonadotropes to examine the effect of proestrous levels of testosterone (1.7 nM) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 0.7 nM) on LH secretion in response to pulsatile GnRH (1 nM) or elevated extracellular K+ (54 mM). For female rat pituitary cells cultured in 17beta-estradiol (E2)-containing medium, androgen treatment for 16 h, but not for 4 h, inhibited the LH secretory response to a pulse of either GnRH or K+ by about 60% and suppressed the acute augmentation action of 20 nM progesterone on GnRH- or K+-induced LH secretion. In the absence of E2, DHT also decreased LH secretion induced by a pulse of GnRH. DHT's suppressive effect on progesterone could be partially overcome with increased progesterone (200 nM) or by removal of DHT during progesterone exposure. For pituitary cells transfected with a reporter plasmid containing three progesterone response elements, DHT only partially suppressed progesterone-stimulated transcriptional activity. The positive action of androgen (16 h) on LH secretion was elicited by multiple GnRH pulses with a latency of about 2 h after the first pulse; this facilitatory action of androgen did not require an E2 background and, therefore, is distinct from GnRH self priming. In summary, these data demonstrate both facilitatory and inhibitory actions of androgen on LH secretion function in female gonadotropes in vitro in the absence or presence of E2; these actions occur with a time course suggestive of a role for androgen in shaping the preovulatory LH surge. Androgen also markedly suppresses progesterone augmentation of stimulated LH secretion, which could be due in part to interference with the trans-activation function of the progesterone receptor.

Agonist and antagonists induce homodimerization and mixed ligand heterodimerization of human progesterone receptors in vivo by a mammalian two-hybrid assay

This study utilizes the mammalian two-hybrid system to examine the role of ligand in the dimerization of human progesterone receptor (hPR). The GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the herpes simplex virus VP16 transactivation domain were fused to the amino terminus of full-length hPR (both the A and B isoforms) to produce chimeric proteins. PR dimerization was detected by the ability of cotransfected GAL4/PR and VP16/PR chimeras in COS cells to induce expression of a reporter gene under the control of GAL4-binding sites (pG5CAT). Hormone agonist-dependent interactions were observed between the two like isoforms of PR (A-A and B-B) and between PR-A and PR-B (A-B), indicating that hormone can stimulate the formation of the three possible dimeric forms of PR within cells. In contrast, neither type I (ZK98299) nor type II (RU486, ZK112993) progestin antagonists stimulated interaction between these same hybrid PR proteins. However, activation of the VP16/PR chimera by antagonists on a progesterone response element-controlled reporter gene (DHRE-E1b-CAT) was only a fraction (4-13%) of that stimulated by agonist R5020. One possibility for the failure to detect an induction in the two-hybrid assay is antagonist-induced repression of the activity of the VP16/PR fusion protein rather than a failure of antagonists to stimulate interaction between the hybrid proteins. To test this idea, an UP-1 carboxyl-terminal truncation mutant of PR was used to construct the two-hybrid proteins. PR-UP-1 selectively binds antagonists, but not agonists, and is fully activated in response to antagonists. Both types of progestin antagonists stimulated interactions between GAL4/PR(UP-1) and VP16/PR(UP-1) hybrid proteins, indicating that antagonists are capable of stimulating PR dimerization in cells and do not function by disrupting or preventing dimerization. To determine whether PR bound to an antagonist can dimerize in whole cells with PR bound to agonist, GAL4/PR(UP-1) was paired in the two-hybrid assay with a VP16/PR fusion protein harboring a point mutation in PR at amino acid 722 (Gly-Cys) that specifically binds progestin agonist but not antagonist. Neither R5020 nor RU486 alone stimulated interaction between these ligand-specific PR hybrid proteins. However, strong interaction was detected by addition of both agonist and antagonists, indicating the formation of mixed ligand heterodimers and that both PR partners require ligand for dimerization to occur. Based on electrophoretic gel mobility shift assays (EMSAs), these heterodimers appear to have substantially reduced DNA binding activity. Progestin antagonists inhibit agonist activation of PR at concentrations that are too low to be accounted for by a simple competition mechanism for binding to PR. We propose that antiprogestin inactivation of PR in trans by heterodimerization contributes to the biological potency of these compounds.

Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation

A critical problem within transcription factor families is how diverse regulatory programs are directed by highly related members. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR, GR) recognize a consensus DNA hormone response element (HRE), but they activate target genes with precise specificity, largely dependent on the promoter and cell context. We have assessed the role of different receptor domains in hormone-specific response by testing chimeras of AR and GR for their ability to activate the androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. Although all of the mutant receptors activated simple HREs, only a few activated the androgen-specific element. One component shared by receptors functional on the AR-specific target was the AR DNA binding domain. Activation was not due to differential DNA affinity but rather to the AR DNA binding domain escaping suppression directed at the GR DNA binding domain in this enhancer context. A further mechanism increasing specific activation was cooperation of receptors at multiple and weak HREs, which was accentuated in the presence of both the AR N terminus and ligand binding domain. These domains together increased recognition of weak HREs, as demonstrated by in vitro DNase I footprinting and transactivation of mutant enhancers. Further, AR N-terminal subdomains reported to interact directly with the ligand binding domain relieved an inhibitory effect imposed by that domain. Therefore, functions intrinsic to AR augment steroid-specific gene activation, by evading negative regulation operating on the domains of other receptors and by enhancing cooperativity through intra- and inter-receptor domain interactions. These subtle distinctions in AR and GR behavior enforce transcriptional specificity established by the context of nonreceptor factors.

Identification of a novel RING finger protein as a coregulator in steroid receptor-mediated gene transcription

Using the DNA-binding domain of androgen receptor (AR) as a bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening, we have identified a small nuclear RING finger protein, termed SNURF, that interacts with AR in a hormone-dependent fashion in both yeast and mammalian cells. Physical interaction between AR and SNURF was demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation from cell extracts and by protein-protein affinity chromatography. Rat SNURF is a highly hydrophilic protein consisting of 194 amino acid residues and comprising a consensus C3HC4 zinc finger (RING) structure in the C-terminal region and a bipartite nuclear localization signal near the N terminus. Immunohistochemical experiments indicated that SNURF is a nuclear protein. SNURF mRNA is expressed in a variety of human and rat tissues. Overexpression of SNURF in cultured mammalian cells enhanced not only androgen, glucocorticoid, and progesterone receptor-dependent transactivation but also basal transcription from steroid-regulated promoters. Mutation of two of the potential Zn2+ coordinating cysteines to serines in the RING finger completely abolished the ability of SNURF to enhance basal transcription, whereas its ability to activate steroid receptor-dependent transcription was maintained, suggesting that there are separate domains in SNURF that mediate interactions with different regulatory factors. SNURF is capable of interacting in vitro with the TATA-binding protein, and the RING finger domain is needed for this interaction. Collectively, we have identified and characterized a ubiquitously expressed RING finger protein, SNURF, that may function as a bridging factor and regulate steroid receptor-dependent transcription by a mechanism different from those of previously identified coactivator or integrator proteins.

Heterodimerization is mainly responsible for the dominant negative activity of amino-terminally truncated rat androgen receptor forms

Rat androgen receptor (rAR) mutants devoid of the amino-terminal transactivation domain are able to behave as dominant negative regulators of wild-type rAR. To address the underlying mechanisms of the trans-dominant negative action, we have examined the roles of the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and the ligand-binding domain (LBD) in this process. Transactivation experiments in CV-1 cells complemented by electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the dominant negative receptor forms repress the function of wild-type rAR mainly through heterodimer formation, rather than through competition for binding to cognate DNA elements. Heterodimerization of receptor forms containing LBDs may take place even in the absence of specific DNA binding.

Localization of functional domains in the androgen receptor

Functional domains of the androgen receptor (AR) have been localized through a combination of studies on naturally occurring AR gene mutations, in vitro mutagenesis studies and comparison with the structure of other members of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily. Two activation domains exist within the amino-terminal domain, and a ligand-dependent activation domain is present in the ligand binding domain. The poly(Gln) stretch within the amino-terminal domain may inhibit the transactivation function of the receptor. Different ligands or binding to different promoters may recruit the use of different activation domains, which may provide promoter-specific effects of receptor action. Co-activator proteins that modulate or enhance AR action have been identified, many of which interact with the ligand binding domain of the AR. Tissue-specific expression of such co-activators, and promoter-specific protein interactions, may also help control the specificity of androgen action. Target Ser residues for phosphorylation have been identified, which may be the site of action for cross-talk from protein kinase signalling pathways. However, the role of phosphorylation in AR function in general is still unclear. It is now clear that interactions occur between receptor domains, modulating functions including ligand dissociation, dimerization and transactivation. By studying the functional domains of the AR, and how they control receptor function in response to different activation signals, we are beginning to understand the mechanisms controlling the specificity of receptor action.

Interaction of androgen receptors with androgen response element in intact cells. Roles of amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions and the ligand

Promoter interference assay was employed to examine in intact cells the roles of the functional domains of androgen receptor (AR) and the ligand for specific DNA interactions using a cytomegalovirus-(androgen response element)-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter (pCMV-ARE2-CAT). Native rat and human ARs interfered with pCMV-ARE2-CAT expression in a hormone-dependent fashion. Low steroid-independent interference seemed to occur because of the ligand binding domain (LBD), which was transcriptionally inhibitory also in a heterologous context. AR devoid of LBD (rARDelta641-902) decreased pCMV-ARE2-CAT activity by 50%. The rARDelta46-408 mutant devoid of the NH2-terminal transcription activation region exhibited ligand-dependent promoter interference of a similar magnitude. Ligand and DNA binding-deficient mutants (hARM807R and rARC562G, respectively) did not influence pCMV-ARE2-CAT expression, although hARM807R binds to ARE in vitro. Non-steroidal anti-androgens casodex and hydroxyflutamide antagonized agonist-dependent promoter interference, whereas cyproterone acetate, RU 56187, RU 57073, and RU 59063 were partial agonists/antagonists. Collectively, interaction of ARs with ARE in intact cells does not require the presence of the COOH-terminal or NH2-terminal domain and/or their interaction. In the context of native AR, however, the androgen-induced conformational change in LBD is mandatory for generation of a transcriptionally competent receptor that binds to DNA in intact cells.

Effects of androgen on brain and pituitary androgen receptors and LH secretion of male guinea pigs

To study the tissue-specific control of androgen receptors by circulating androgens, guinea pigs were castrated or castrated and treated with crystalline testosterone propionate. Levels of serum androgens and LH were measured and brain and peripheral tissues were collected for determination of androgen receptor levels under differing androgen states. We found that circulating androgen levels changed rapidly following castration or treatment with exogenous androgen. LH secretion was coupled to circulating androgens; high levels of androgen quickly suppressed LH secretion, whereas LH levels did not rise significantly above intact levels until 7 days following castration. Androgen receptor levels were effected by circulating androgens. Cytosolic androgen receptors (ARc) increased significantly in the preoptic area (POA), septum, anterior pituitary, prostate and seminal vesicle following castration, whereas nuclear androgen receptors (ARn) decreased significantly in the POA, septum, medial basal hypothalamus (MBH), amygdala, parietal cortex, pituitary, prostate and seminal vesicle. Exogenous androgens, which increased serum steroid levels significantly above that in intact animals, decreased ARc below control levels in MBH, amygdala, pituitary and seminal vesicle. High circulating androgens increased ARn above intact levels in the MBH, pituitary and prostate. It thus appears that circulating androgens regulate LH secretion and have profound, but tissue-specific effects on androgen receptors in the guinea pig.

Mutual transcriptional interference between RelA and androgen receptor

Cross-modulation between androgen receptor (AR) and NF-kappaB/Rel proteins was studied using various androgen- and NF-kappaB-regulated reporter genes under transient transfection conditions. In COS-1 cells, elevated expression of RelA (p65) repressed AR-mediated transactivation in a dose-dependent manner, whereas NFkappaB1 (p50), another major member of the NF-kappaB family, did not influence transactivation. The repression of AR appeared to involve the N-terminal region of the protein between residue 297 and the DNA-binding domain. RelA-mediated transrepression could not be overcome by increasing the amount of AR. Transcriptional interference between RelA and AR was mutual in that cotransfected AR was able to attenuate transactivation by RelA in a dose- and steroid-dependent fashion. An excess of RelA was able to rescue the repression to some extent. Immunological analyses of RelA and AR protein levels indicated that transrepression was not due to reciprocal decrease in their amounts. Neither did AR increase the concentration of IkappaBalpha, which can sequester and inactivate RelA. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using extracts from cotransfected cells and purified recombinant proteins showed that AR and RelA did not significantly influence each other's DNA binding activity. Nevertheless, protein-protein interaction experiments demonstrated a weak association between AR and RelA. Collectively, these data suggest that the mutual repression in intact cells is due to formation of AR-RelA complexes that are held together by another partner or to competition for a coactivator required for transcription.

Androgen receptor mRNA expression in Xenopus laevis CNS: sexual dimorphism and regulation in laryngeal motor nucleus

Using Northern analysis, in situ hybridization, and nuclease protection assays, the expression and regulation of androgen receptor messenger RNA (AR mRNA) was examined in the CNS of juvenile Xenopus laevis. Only one of the AR mRNA isoforms expressed in X. laevis is transcribed in the CNS as shown by Northern blot analysis. Nuclease protection assays demonstrate that the expression of AR mRNA is higher in the brain stem than in the telencephalon and diencephalon. Although expression of AR mRNA is widespread throughout the CNS, cells of cranial nerve nucleus IX-X (N.IX-X) and spinal cord display the highest in situ hybridization signals in their cytoplasm. Double labeling using horseradish peroxidase and digoxigenin labeled AR probes reveals that laryngeal and anterior spinal cord motor neurons express AR mRNA. More cells express AR mRNA in N.IX-X of males than of females. The number of AR expressing cells in N. IX-X decreases following gonadectomy in both sexes, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) treatment for 1 month reverses this effect. Increased expression of AR mRNA in the brain of DHT treated animals is also apparent in nuclease protection assays. Sex differences in number of AR expressing cells and hormone regulation of AR mRNA expression in motor nuclei may influence neuromuscular systems devoted to sexually differentiated behaviors.

The androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The androgen receptor is a member of the family of nuclear receptors. In its activated form as an androgen receptor ligand complex (the ligand can either be testosterone or 5a-dihydrotestosterone), the androgen receptor is able to regulate a specific expression of target genes. The androgen receptor is expressed at high levels in male reproductive tissues. Mutations in the androgen receptor gene are the molecular cause of the androgen insensitivity syndrome, which is characterized by an aberrant male or an apparently female phenotype. Expansion of a CAG-repeat, encoding a polymorphic glutamine stretch is the cause of a rare motor neuron disease (Kennedy's disease). Hormonal therapy is the treatment of choice for metastatic prostate cancer. Hormone refractory prostate tumors in general still express androgen receptor. In a proportion of the late stage prostate tumors, somatic mutations in the androgen receptor gene have been described. Mutations can result in diminished ligand specificity of the androgen receptor. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that ligand independent mechanisms can also be involved in androgen receptor activation.

Glucocorticosteroid receptor dimerization investigated by analysis of receptor binding to glucocorticosteroid responsive elements using a monomer-dimer equilibrium model

The aim of this study was to analyze the role of regions of the glucocorticosteroid receptor (GR) outside the DNA binding domain (DBD) in GR binding and homodimerization efficiencies by using a model according to which GR monomers and dimers are in equilibrium and able to bind to each half-palindromic motif of a GRE. We studied wild-type human GR (hGR), an N-terminal domain deleted mutant (lacking amino acids 1-417), a C-terminal deleted mutant (lacking amino acids 550-777, the main part of the ligand binding domain), and two rat GR derivatives limited to the DNA binding domain and proximal sequences. Specific GR monomer and dimer complexes with 33P-labeled palindromic or half-palindromic GREs were identified by gel-shift and methylation interference experiments. The different complexes were quantified, and the multiple equilibrium constants for their formation were determined. The affinity of the monomer for the GRE was not affected by the deletions of regions outside the DBD. However, the affinity of the dimer for the GRE was clearly increased by the presence of the N-terminal domain and, to a lesser extent, by that of the main part of the C-terminal domain. By using this model, we also obtained a GR dimerization constant in the absence of specific binding to GRE. Dimerization of the DBD was not increased by the presence of only one of the GR terminal domains, but an increase in dimerization efficiency was observed when both domains were present, suggesting a structural synergy between the N- and C-terminal domains in GR homodimerization.