Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: the precatheterization QT interval

Intra-procedural arrhythmia during cardiac catheterization: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cardiac catheterization is among the most performed medical procedures in the modern era. There were sporadic reports indicating that cardiac arrhythmias are common during cardiac catheterization, and there are risks of developing serious and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and high-grade conduction disturbances such as complete heart block (CHB), requiring immediate interventions. However, there is lack of systematic overview of these conditions.

AIM

To systematically review existing literature and gain better understanding of the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias during cardiac catheterization, and their impact on outcomes, as well as potential approaches to minimize this risk.

METHODS

We applied a combination of terms potentially used in reports describing various cardiac arrhythmias during common cardiac catheterization procedures to systematically search PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as references of full-length articles.

RESULTS

During right heart catheterization (RHC), the incidence of atrial arrhythmias (premature atrial complexes, atrial fibrillation and flutter) was low (< 1%); these arrhythmias were usually transient and self-limited. RHC associated with the development of a new RBBB at a rate of 0.1%-0.3% in individuals with normal conduction system but up to 6.3% in individuals with pre-existing left bundle branch block. These patients may require temporary pacing due to transient CHB. Isolated premature ventricular complexes or non-sustained VT are common during RHC (up to 20% of cases). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VT and/or VF) requiring either withdrawal of catheter or cardioversion occurred infrequently (1%-1.3%). During left heart catheterizations (LHC), the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias has declined significantly over the last few decades, from 1.1% historically to 0.1% currently. The overall reported rate of VT/VF in diagnostic LHC and coronary angiography is 0.8%. The risk of VT/VF was higher during percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease (1.1%) and even higher for patients with acute myocardial infarctions (4.1%-4.3%). Intravenous adenosine and papaverine bolus for fractional flow reserve measurement, as well as intracoronary imaging using optical coherence tomography have been reported to induce VF. Although uncommon, LHC and coronary angiography were also reported to induce conduction disturbances including CHB.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrhythmias are common and potentially serious complications of cardiac catheterization procedures, and it demands constant vigilance and readiness to intervene during procedures.

Alteration of ventricular repolarization by intracoronary infusion of normal saline in patients with variant angina

Background and Objectives

During coronary angiography and interventional procedures, catheters that are engaged in a coronary ostium are routinely flushed, typically with normal saline, to expel blood from the catheter or to inject a pharmacologic agent. Saline contains sodium and chloride ions. Such injections may affect the electrophysiologic properties of the myocardium; however, the effect of normal saline on ventricular repolarization has not been established in patients with variant angina.

Subjects and Methods

We studied 51 consecutive patients with variant angina. Five mL of normal saline (NS) or 5% dextrose solution (DW) were infused into the left coronary artery in random order. We measured the heart rate, QT interval, and T-wave amplitude using Mac-Lac 5.2.

Results

The baseline clinical characteristics were not different between the NS {n=30 (14 males); mean age, 56±10 years} and the 5% DW groups {n=21 (7 males); mean age, 59±10 years}. The changes in the mean corrected QT (QTc) interval were significantly increased at the time of infusion of NS compared to 5% DW (45.1±30.3 vs. 20.9±23.3 ms, p=0.004). There was a T-wave amplitude change >0.2 mV in at least one-lead in 27 patients (90.0%) during NS infusion compared to 7 patients (33.3%) during 5% DW infusions (p=0.001). No significant changes in heart rate and blood pressure were noted during of the infusions.

Conclusion

NS was associated with prolongation of ventricular repolarization in patients with variant angina.

Refining detection of drug-induced proarrhythmia: QT interval and TRIaD

QT interval prolongation is so frequently associated with torsades de pointes (TdP) that it has come to be recognized as a surrogate marker of this unique tachyarrhythmia. However, not only does TdP not always follow QT interval prolongation, but TdP can occur even in the absence of a prolonged QT interval. Worse still, even shortening of the QT interval may be associated with serious arrhythmias (particularly ventricular tachycardia [VT] and ventricular fibrillation [VF]). It appears increasingly probable that the distinction between various ventricular tachyarrhythmias may be arbitrary, and drug-induced TdP, polymorphic VT, VT, catecholaminergic polymorphic VT, and VF may represent discrete entities within a spectrum of drug-induced proarrhythmia. Although they are differentiated by the coupling interval and the duration of QT interval, they appear to share a common substrate: a set of disturbances of repolarization characterized by Triangulation, Reverse use dependency, electrical Instability of the action potential, and Dispersion (TRIaD). It is becoming increasingly evident that augmentation of TRIaD, rather than changes in the duration of QT interval, provides the proarrhythmic substrate. In contrast, when not associated with an increase of TRIaD, QT interval prolongation can be an antiarrhythmic property. Electrophysiologically, augmentation of TRIaD can be explained by inhibition of hERG (human ether-a-go-go related gene) channel. Because drug-induced disturbances in repolarization commonly result from inhibition of hERG channels or I(Kr), hERG blockade and the resulting prolongation of QT interval are important properties of a drug to be studied. However, these need only be a concern if associated with TRIaD. More significantly, TRIaD so often precedes prolongation of action potential duration or QT interval and ventricular tachyarrhythmias that it should be considered a marker of proarrhythmia until proven otherwise, even in the absence of QT interval prolongation. Detecting drug-induced augmentation of TRIaD may offer an additional, more sensitive, and accurate indicator of the broader proarrhythmic potential of a drug than may QT interval prolongation alone.

A comparison of electrocardiographic changes during reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction by thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Different electrocardiographic changes have been described during thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction to indicate successful reperfusion. The occluded coronary artery also can be reopened by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). This study was performed to compare electrocardiographic changes during primary or rescue PTCA and thrombolytic therapy. The electrocardiographic changes were studied directly at the moment of reperfusion during PTCA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Continuous 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring was performed in 110 patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing a reperfusion intervention (thrombolytic therapy or primary or rescue PTCA) to assess electrocardiographic changes during reperfusion. Patency and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow in the infarct-related artery were assessed by coronary angiography. During reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery, early signs of reperfusion were an increase of ST-segment deviation (30%), ST-segment normalization (70%), and terminal T-wave inversion (60%); only 11% of patients showed no ST-segment changes. Thrombolytic therapy was significantly more often accompanied by a transient increase in ST-segment deviation compared with primary PTCA. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm was documented in 51%, an increase in the number of ventricular premature complexes in 42%, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 7%, and bradycardia in 18% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the occurrence of specific electrocardiographic changes at the time of reperfusion. The pattern of ST-segment change upon reperfusion relates to the type of treatment. Awareness of electrocardiographic changes at the moment of reperfusion will help to select patients for rescue PTCA and can be used to assess the effect of future pharmacologic interventions to limit reperfusion damage.

Long QT interval syndrome. A new look at an old electrocardiographic measurement--the power of the computer

Because clinical studies frequently include only a marginal number of patients, these relatively new, robust statistical techniques will have increased use. The utilization of ROC curves will be more commonplace because they permit the comprehension of the data in a more dynamic mode than merely the reporting of sensitivities and specificities.

Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography

A double-blind randomized study was performed in 60 patients to compare the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes induced during cardiac angiography by 2 contrast media with relatively low osmolality. Ioxaglate meglumine sodium, an ionic dimer contrast medium, was compared with iopamidol, a nonionic compound. Of the 30 patients who received ioxaglate, 13 (43%) experienced a mild to moderate adverse reaction to the contrast media, while only 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the iopamidol group had similar side effects (p less than 0.005). Significant prolongations of the QT intervals occurred with the ioxaglate injections. The QT intervals increased from 402 +/- 46 to 442 +/- 59 ms (p less than 0.001) with the right coronary artery injection and similar changes were observed after the left coronary artery injection and left ventriculography. Significant ST-segment and T-wave amplitude changes also occurred in the ioxaglate group. With iopamidol injections, there were no significant changes in any of these parameters. After the left ventriculogram, there were similar decreases in the systolic arterial pressures in both groups (-14 +/- 10 mm Hg with ioxaglate and -21 +/- 9 mm Hg with iopamidol). The left ventricular end-diastolic pressures increased after the ventriculogram in both groups (5 +/- 5 vs 2 +/- 3 mm Hg with ioxaglate and iopamidol, respectively, 60 seconds after the injection). This report demonstrates that mild to moderate adverse reactions, QT-interval prolongations, ST and T-wave changes were significantly greater during coronary angiography with ioxaglate when compared with iopamidol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of calcium-binding additives on ventricular fibrillation and repolarization changes during coronary angiography

Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography with Renografin-76 (meglumine sodium diatrizoate) has been attributed to the calcium-binding additives sodium citrate and sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which may produce repolarization changes manifested as prolongation of the QT interval. Angiovist-370 is a newer form of meglumine sodium diatrizoate that contains calcium EDTA as its additive and thus has a decreased calcium-binding effect. Eight hundred sixteen patients were prospectively randomized to receive either Renografin-76 or Angiovist-370. Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 10 of 410 patients receiving Renografin-76 and in 0 of 406 patients given Angiovist-370 (p less than 0.0005). Clinical data were analyzed without knowledge of other data in the 10 patients treated with Renografin-76 who had ventricular fibrillation (Group I), 103 randomly selected patients who also received Renografin-76 but had no ventricular fibrillation (Group II) and 108 randomly selected patients given Angiovist-370 (Group III). Of several variables examined, only the QT interval differentiated patients receiving Renografin-76 and Angiovist-370. The mean corrected QT interval (QTc interval) before coronary angiography was slightly but not significantly (p = 0.7) higher in Group I than in Groups II and III. Ten seconds after the first left coronary artery injection it was more prolonged in Groups I and II (0.552 and 0.561 second, respectively) than in Group III (0.448 second) (p less than 0.00005). Similarly, 10 seconds after the first right coronary artery injection it was significantly longer in Groups I and II (0.545 and 0.544 second) than in Group III (0.477 second) (p less than 0.00005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)