Use of high jejunostomy in extensive NEC

The surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, is strongly associated with prematurity and typically occurs following initiation of enteral feeds. Mild NEC is adequately treated by cessation of enteral feeding, empiric antibiotics, and supportive care. Approximately 50% of affected infants will develop progressive intestinal necrosis requiring urgent operation. Several surgical techniques have been described, but there is no clear survival benefit for any single operative approach. While debate continues regarding the optimal surgical management for infants with severe NEC, future progress will likely depend on the development of improved diagnostic tools and preventive therapies.

Outcomes of diverting jejunostomy for severe necrotizing enterocolitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A diverting jejunostomy without bowel resection is an option for surgical management of extensive necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We aimed to determine outcomes of infants who underwent this operation.

METHODS

We collected clinical and outcome data on infants undergoing a diverting jejunostomy with no bowel resection as a primary procedure for extensive NEC. Data are median (range).

RESULTS

Seventeen neonates underwent a diverting jejunostomy. Eleven (65%) had multifocal disease, whereas 6 (35%) had pan-intestinal involvement. Perforation was seen in 7 (41%), all with multifocal disease. The stoma was placed 12 cm (8-45) from the duodenojejunal flexure. Six infants (35%) died, 4 of these within a day of operation, owing to persisting instability. Intestinal continuity was achieved in all survivors after 52 (17-83) days, and only 1 infant (9%) had a colonic stricture. Seven infants recovered without the need for further intestinal resection distal to the jejunostomy. In those that survived, parenteral nutrition was needed for 2.2 months (1.3-18.0). A single patient had short bowel syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

A diverting jejunostomy is a useful surgical procedure that allows high survival and enteral autonomy in the treatment of extensive NEC. In most patients, the affected intestine recovers without further intestinal resection.

Surgery for necrotising enterocolitis: primary anastomosis or enterostomy?

The ideal surgical management of neonates with necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of bowel resection with primary anastomosis with the results of bowel resection with enterostomy. Sixty-three neonates with NEC had a bowel resection in the acute phase of the disease in the period between February 1990 and March 2001. Thirty-four of them (54%) underwent resection of the bowel with primary anastomosis (Group A), and 29 (46%) had resection with enterostomy (Group B). Group A had a lower gestational age and lower birth weight. Mortality, complication rate, and postoperative weight gain were not significantly different between the groups. However, Group B had a significantly longer primary hospital stay (80 +/- 49 days versus 58 +/- 31 days, P < 0.04) and needed a 2nd hospital stay for restoring gastrointestinal continuity. For both reasons, it can be argued that primary anastomosis is superior to enterostomy after resection.

Avoidance of stomas and delayed anastomosis for bowel necrosis: the 'clip and drop-back' technique

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and midgut volvulus (MGV) often are associated with extensive bowel necrosis. These cases may require extensive enterectomy and the formation of high or multiple stomas, and frequently are complicated by short bowel syndrome, excessive fluid losses, fistulas, stenosis, and skin breakdown. This report describes a "clip and drop-back" technique, followed by delayed anastomosis performed 48 to 72 hours later. The technique was successful in five severely ill infants (3 NEC, 2 MGV) with extensive necrosis, bowel perforation(s), and peritonitis, who required either a high stoma near the ligament of Treitz or multiple resections and enterostomies. This method removes obvious necrotic perforated bowel, controls contamination, avoids stomas (and their inherent complications in this age group), and preserves bowel length. All five babies survived. The technique is a useful addition to the pediatric surgeon's operative armamentarium in selective cases.

Necrotizing enterocolitis in the extremely low birth weight infant

Improved neonatal management has resulted in an enlarging population of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. These infants have a high incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and a high mortality rate. The authors compared two groups of NEC patients: ELBW infants (< 1,000 g and/or < or = 28 weeks' gestation) and "standard" premature infants (29 to 36 weeks' gestation). NEC was classified according to the extent of bowel involvement: (1) focal, (2) diffuse, or (3) pan involvement (pan necrosis). Clinical laboratory, radiological, pathological, and bacteriologic findings, management, and mortality were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to gender, race, delivery mode, or incidence of prenatal or perinatal problems. The most common presenting signs in both groups were abdominal distension, vomiting, and feeding intolerance. The onset of signs and the time of first feedings were significantly later in the ELBW group. Pneumatosis was the most frequent initial radiological finding (60% of the ELBW group, 75% of the premature group). Portal vein air (PVA) was present in 29% of the ELBW and premature infants. Seventy-one percent of ELBW infants with PVA had pan involvement, versus 40% of premature infants (P < .05). There were significant differences in the peritoneal cultures between the groups. The premature group had significantly more Escherichia coli (54% v 23%). The ELBW group had a wider variety of microorganisms (eg, Clostridium sp, Pseudomonas sp, and yeast). Survival was significantly higher for the premature group (84% v 55%). The mortality rate was 93% when pan involvement was present in the ELBW group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis: when? how?

In 10 years (1981-1990) 28 out of 54 neonates (51.8%) with definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) underwent surgery. Operation was performed at 13.5 +/- 8.8 (range 3-38) days of life, after 1.7 +/- 1.5 (range 1-6) days from the onset of symptoms. Aiming to perform laparotomy before the occurrence of perforation, surgery was liberally indicated in stage IIIa, according to Walsh-Kliegman. Explorative laparotomy (+peritoneal drainage in 2 cases) was performed in 4 patients with massive intestinal necrosis: all died within 3 days of surgery. In one neonate, only pneumatosis was present and resection was not considered mandatory. Intestinal resection and enterostomy was performed in 17 neonates, 5 of them with perforation; three developed an intestinal stenosis. Enterostomy was closed after 116.2 +/- 61.8 days (range 26-193); 11 patients (64.7%) are long-term survivors. Intestinal resection and primary anastomosis was performed in 6 babies, 3 of them with perforation. Postoperatively, 2 dehiscences and 1 stenosis were recorded, but all children survived. In our opinion, resection followed by primary anastomosis seems to be the most satisfactory surgical option.

Necrotizing enterocolitis in infancy

The most common gastrointestinal emergency in the newborn is necrotizing enterocolitis. Premature babies are the most likely victims, but it also occurs in full-term infants. Although great strides have been made in elucidating some of the factors responsible for necrotizing enterocolitis, such as intestinal ischemia, bacterial overgrowth, and feeding dysfunction, the exact etiology is as yet unclear. The timing and indications for surgery differ from institution to institution, but the long-term outcome is similar in most large series. The overall mortality rate remains about 20% to 40%, and of the survivors, about one half seem to have no sequelae, the remaining infants having neurologic and gastrointestinal deficits of various degrees of significance.

Changing trends in necrotizing enterocolitis. Experience with 302 cases in two decades

Three hundred two infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated from 1972 to 1990. One hundred eighteen were treated medically while 184 infants required operation. Comparisons were made between two treatment periods, 1972 to 1982 (n = 176) and 1983 to 1990 (n = 126). Infants in the more recent era were of lower birth weight (1505 +/- 853 g versus 1645 +/- 836 g), earlier gestational age (30.4 +/- 4.7 weeks versus 32.4.5 weeks; [p less than 0.01]), had symptom onset at an older age (15.7 +/- 13.9 days versus 10.0 +/- 10.8 days; [p less than 0.001]), and a lower incidence of hyaline membrane disease (p less than 0.001). Fewer patients in the 1983 to 1990 group had acidosis (p less than 0.001) and severe oliguria (p less than 0.001). Operation was performed sooner after diagnosis in the second group (2.6 versus 3.8 days; [p less than 0.001]). Survival was unaffected by sex, maternal complications, or whether infants were inborn or transferred from other facilities. Improved survival (1983 to 1990) was observed in those infants between 24 to 27 weeks gestation (p less than 0.002) and those weighing less than 1000 g (p less than 0.001). Since 1983 portal vein air (PVA) on abdominal radiographs was used as an indicator for operation. Survival in infants with PVA has improved from 29% to 64% (p less than 0.02). Despite patients being more immature and weighing less, the overall survival rate improved from 58% (1972 to 1982) to 82% (1983 to 1990) (p less than 0.001). Operative survival rate improved from 51% to 75% (p less than 0.002). Long-term survival was 75% overall and 65% for surgical infants in the 1983 to 1990 group (p less than 0.05).

A 13-year experience with peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia for necrotizing enterocolitis perforation

Between 1974 and 1986, inclusive, over 400 newborns with clinical, radiological, and/or pathological evidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario. Within this group were 37 babies who had a bowel perforation that was treated with peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia. Eighty-eight percent of the 41 weighed less than 1,500 g and 65% weighed less than 1,000 g; during the same time 40 other neonates (9% of the total) with perforated NEC had laparotomies. Twelve neonates (32%) required only drainage with complete recovery of their intestinal tracts. The remaining 25 (68%) fell into one of three groups: (1) nine (24%) had rapid downhill course, sepsis, and death without laparotomy; (2) nine (24%) had rapid downhill course, sepsis, and laparotomy (five deaths); (3) seven (20%) had slow development of bowel obstruction requiring operation (two deaths). The overall survival rate was 56%. These results continue to indicate that this method is effective in temporizing 88% of the small and/or very ill babies with a NEC perforation. However, an added bonus is that 32% of these newborns treated in this fashion had complete resolution of their disease.

Necrotizing enterocolitis of the neonate

Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common gastrointestinal emergency in the newborn. The syndrome strikes premature infants during the first 2 weeks of life. Abdominal distention, lethargy, and feeding intolerance are early signs of NEC that may progress to gastrointestinal bleeding and hemodynamic instability. The radiographic hallmark of NEC is pneumatosis intestinalis (air in the bowel wall). The ileum and colon are the usual sites of crepitant intestinal necrosis, leading frequently to perforation. In spite of appropriate medical therapy, about half of the infants with NEC develop intestinal gangrene or perforation and require surgery, consisting of bowel resection and enterostomy formation. The most common late complication, intestinal stricture, occurs in 15 to 35 per cent of recovered infants. Overall mortality from NEC ranges from 20 to 40 per cent. The etiology of NEC is poorly understood and is considered to be multifactorial, related to ischemia, bacterial colonization, and formula feedings in a susceptible infant. Future progress in the treatment of NEC may be achieved by earlier detection of necrosis, modification of gastrointestinal flora, or by bolstering the deficient gastrointestinal immune mechanisms of the premature neonate.

Primary anastomosis for necrotising enterocolitis: a 12-year experience

Between January 1975 and October 1987, 50 cases of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) have required surgery. The principle that the best management is resection and exteriorisation of the ends, which was developed in the early 1970s, has been superseded by the realisation that resection and primary anastomosis can be safe in a well-resuscitated infant in whom the bowel ends appear viable. Eight babies had widespread NEC and no procedure was performed. Thirteen babies had resection and exteriorisation with five long-term survivors (39%). Twenty-nine babies had a primary anastomosis irrespective of birth weight, gestational age, length of resection, or the presence of peritonitis--with 22 (76%) long-term survivors. The pre-operative risk factors and length of bowel resected were similar in the two groups. The length of hospital stay, the period of total parenteral nutrition, the time to full feeds, and the time on a ventilator were all shorter in the primary anastomosis group, with no increase in short- or long-term morbidity or mortality. Provided that the bowel ends are viable, primary anastomosis is the procedure of choice for babies with NEC requiring laparotomy.

Resection with primary anastomosis for necrotizing enterocolitis: a contrasting view

Resection with primary anastomosis is currently being advocated for treatment of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. To determine whether our own data would support such an approach, we reviewed retrospectively our experience with this disease since 1974. Since that time, 173 infants have been admitted for treatment of advanced (surgical) disease in its acute phase, of whom 143 underwent resection for cure; the remainder either underwent laparotomy with decompression (3), laparotomy with drainage (3), laparotomy alone (14), died at operation (1), or could not be resuscitated sufficiently to withstand operation (9). Excluded were patients who underwent operative repair of late stricture (6), all of whom survived with no morbidity. Among those resected for cure, 27 infants were carefully selected by the operating surgeon for treatment by means of resection with primary anastomosis, based on the limited and apparently discrete nature of their disease; in three the procedure was combined with a decompressing enterostomy. In the majority of cases (14), the disease was found to involve multiple areas of intestine, but was limited to a particular anatomic region, usually distal ileum and/or ascending colon; in the remainder, it was due to discrete ileal or jejunal perforation or ulcer. Overall survival among those resected for cure was 65% (96/143). It was 48% (13/27) among those treated by means of resection with primary anastomosis but 72% (83/116) among those who underwent resection with enterostomy. However, if the early years of the series (1974 to 1976) are excluded, a time when resection with enterostomy had not yet become established as standard therapy, overall survival was 77% (77/100), 64% (9/14) among those anastomosed primarily.