Anal reeducation for postoperative fecal incontinence in congenital diseases of the rectum and anus

Electrical stimulation and biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review determines the best known form of biofeedback (BF) and/or electrical stimulation (ES) for the treatment of fecal incontinence in adults and rates the quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Attention is given to type, strength, and application mode of the current for ES and to safety.

METHODS

Methods followed the Cochrane Handbook. Randomized controlled trials were included. Studies were searched in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (registration number (PROSPERO): CRD42011001334).

RESULTS

BF and/or ES were studied in 13 randomized parallel-group trials. In 12 trials, at least one therapy group received BF alone and/or in combination with ES, while ES alone was evaluated in seven trials. Three (four) trials were rated as of high (moderate) quality. Average current strength was reported in three of seven studies investigating ES; only two studies reached the therapeutic window. No trial showed superiority of control, or of BF alone or of ES alone when compared with BF + ES. Superiority of BF + ES over any monotherapy was demonstrated in several trials. Amplitude-modulated medium-frequency (AM-MF) stimulation, also termed pre-modulated interferential stimulation, combined with BF was superior to both low-frequency ES and BF alone, and 50 % of the patients were continent after 6 months of treatment. Effects increased with treatment duration. Safety reporting was bad, and there are safety issues with some forms of low-frequency ES.

CONCLUSIONS

There is sufficient evidence for the efficacy of BF plus ES combined in treating fecal incontinence. AM-MF plus BF seems to be the most effective and safe treatment.

KEY MESSAGES

• The higher the quality of the randomized trial the more likely was a significant difference between treatment groups. • Two times more patients became continent when biofeedback was used instead of a control, such as pelvic floor exercises. • Two times more patients became continent when biofeedback plus electrical stimulation was used instead of biofeedback only. • Low-frequency electrical stimulation can have adverse device effects, and this is in contrast to amplitude-modulated medium-frequency electrical stimulation. • There is high quality evidence that amplitude-modulated medium-frequency electrical stimulation plus electromyography biofeedback is the best second-line treatment for fecal incontinence.

Electrical stimulation and biofeedback exercise of pelvic floor muscle for children with faecal incontinence after surgery for anorectal malformation

We report our experience of electrical stimulation and biofeedback exercise of pelvic floor muscle for children with faecal incontinence after surgery for anorectal malformation (ARM). Electrical stimulation and biofeedback exercise of pelvic floor muscle were performed on children with post-operative faecal soiling following repair of intermediate or high type ARM. Children under the age of 5 years or with learning difficulties were excluded. They had 6 months supervised programme in the Department of Physiotherapy followed by 6 months home based programme. Bowel management including toilet training, dietary advice, medications and enemas were started before the pelvic floor muscle exercise and continued throughout the programme. Soiling frequency rank, Rintala continence score, sphincter muscle electromyography (EMG) and anorectal manometry were assessed before and after the programme. Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for statistical analysis. From March 2001 to May 2006, 17 children were referred to the programme. Twelve patients (M:F = 10:2; age = 5-17 years) completed the programme. There was a trend of improvement in Rintala score at sixth month (p = 0.206) and at the end of programme (p = 0.061). Faecal soiling was significantly improved at sixth month (p = 0.01) and at the end of the programme (p = 0.004). Mean sphincter muscle EMG before treatment was 1.699 microV. Mean EMG at sixth month and after the programme was 3.308 microV (p = 0.034) and 3.309 microV (p = 0.002) respectively. After the programme, there was a mean increase in anal sphincter squeeze pressure of 29.9 mmHg (p = 0.007). Electrical stimulation and biofeedback exercise of pelvic floor muscle is an effective adjunct for the treatment of faecal incontinence in children following surgery for anorectal malformation.

Congenital pouch colon: follow-up and functional results after definitive surgery

PURPOSE

In this study, functional results with regard to fecal continence levels and other parameters were studied in 22 patients with congenital pouch colon associated with anorectal agenesis (CPC) more than 3 years old who had undergone definitive pull-through surgery 1 to 13 years earlier. An attempt was made to formulate treatment protocols for management of fecal incontinence and other problems associated with CPC.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 14 males and 8 females. Three of the 8 female patients had had a cloacal malformation. The medical records of the patients were scrutinized and they were classified into 4 subtypes based on the length of normal colon proximal to the colonic pouch. The patients were further categorized into 3 groups based on the terminal bowel that had been pulled-through, namely, the ileum or colon proximal to the colonic pouch or a tubularized segment of the colonic pouch. The somatic growth of the patients was studied. Clinical assessment of fecal continence was performed by the Kelly and the Kiesewetter and Chang scoring systems. A computed tomographic scan of the pelvis with a barium enema was performed to assess the terminal bowel and its placement as well as the bony and muscular anatomy of the pelvis. The urinary system was assessed by a clinical history as well as by abdominal ultrasound and a micturating cystourethrogram. Various treatment modalities including dietary modifications, drugs, and enemas were instituted in patients with poor continence levels, and the response to treatment studied.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (59.2%), all with an ileal pull-through, had height and weight less than 50% of that expected for their ages. Overall fecal continence was "poor" in 17 patients and "fair" in only 5 patients. Patients with pull-through of either ileum or normal colon often had very frequent passage of liquid or semisolid stools, whereas the 4 patients with pull-through of tubularized colon had infrequent passage of semisolid stools with abdominal distension and bloating. One of these 4 patients had massive colonic redilatation necessitating surgical correction. Mucosal prolapse and perineal excoriations were frequent findings. Ultrasonography and micturating cystourethrogram showed hydroureteronephrosis and vesicoureteric reflux in 5 patients. Radiologic assessment revealed that there were no significant sacral abnormalities and the striated sphincteric musculature was well developed, although the levator ani was thinner than normal in 15 patients (68%). The bowel was very well placed in the sphincteric complex in 19 patients (86%). In 7 of the 13 patients who had pull-through of normal ileum or colon, some improvement in continence levels was seen 3 to 6 months after institution of dietary measures, loperamide, and saline-water enemas. Two of 3 patients with pull-through of tubularized colon improved to some extent with colonic washouts alone. Overall, quality of life was poor in the 22 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that the sacrum is usually normal, the sphincteric musculature well developed, and the terminal bowel well placed without any anal strictures, long-term prognosis with regard to fecal continence, growth and development, and quality of life appears to be dismal for all subtypes of CPC, irrespective of the type of definitive surgery performed. Corrective measures also appear to be of limited value. Various newer management modalities for management of fecal incontinence may be considered, but in several patients a permanent abdominal stoma may be a more practical solution.

Bio-feedback treatment of fecal incontinence: Where are we, and where are we going?

Fecal incontinence is a disabling disease, often observed in young subjects, that may have devastating psycho-social consequences. In the last years, numerous evidences have been reported on the efficacy of bio-feedback techniques for the treatment of this disorder. Overall, the literature data claim a success rate in more than 70% of cases in the short term. However, recent controlled trials have not confirmed this optimistic view, thus emphasizing the role of standard care. Nonetheless, many authors believe that this should be the first therapeutic approach for fecal incontinence due to the efficacy, lack of side-effects, and scarce invasiveness. Well-designed randomized, controlled trial are eagerly awaited to solve this therapeutic dilemma.